Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology最新文献

Background: Smoking negatively impacts postoperative outcomes but acute abstinence from smoking during hospitalization can increase postoperative pain, lower pain thresholds, disrupt pain management, and trigger hyperalgesia due to abrupt nicotine withdrawal in tobacco users. Nicotine replacement therapy has been recommended to minimize these complications. We hypothesized that a high dose (21 mg/24 h) transdermal nicotine (TDN) patch would reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements.

Methods: One hundred abstinent tobacco smokers undergoing single-level spinal fusion were randomized into placebo (n=50) and nicotine treatment (n=50) groups. Placebo and TDN patches were applied 24 hours before surgery until 48 hours after surgery. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid (morphine) consumption, and serum nicotine levels. The relationship between daily tobacco use and pain and opioid requirements, and between serum nicotine levels and morphine consumption, were assessed.

Results: Postoperative pain scores at rest and on movement were lower in the nicotine group than in the placebo group at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery (P<0.05). Postoperative morphine consumption was lower in the nicotine group than in the placebo group (9.92 ± 4.0 vs. 15.9 ± 5.0 mg, respectively; P=0.0002). There was a positive correlation between the number of cigarettes smoked per day and postoperative pain scores at rest (r = 0.4553; P = 0.0001) and during movement and a negative correlation between serum nicotine concentration and postoperative morphine consumption (r =-0.3664; P = 0.0089).

Conclusions: TDN patches (21 mg/24 h) reduced postoperative pain and opioid requirements in abstinent tobacco smokes undergoing spinal fusion.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative pager alerts to the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP), a delirium prevention service, would accelerate program enrollment for older surgical patients. This study also tested feasibility of family care partner interventions for delirium prevention.

Methods: This single-center, pilot clinical trial factorially randomized 57 non-cardiac surgical patients ≥70 years of age to 4 arms: (1) standard care, (2) pager alerts to accelerate HELP enrollment, (3) family care partner-based delirium prevention interventions, or (4) a combined arm with both HELP and family interventions. The primary clinical outcome was delirium (assessed through the Confusion Assessment Method).

Results: In the pager alerting arms, 13/24 (54%) participants were enrolled by HELP on postoperative day 1 compared with 0/26 (0%, P<0.001) in the non-alerting arms. Median [interquartile range] time spent in delirium prevention protocols was significantly longer in pager alerting arms than in non-alerting arms (39 [5 to 75] min vs. 0 [0 to 0] min; P<0.001). Family care partners spent 18 [11 to 25)] hours at the bedside over the first 3 postoperative days. There was no significant difference in delirium occurrence in participants randomized to pager alert arms compared with non-alerting arms (odds ratio, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.97-1.07; P=0.390). Similarly, there was no significant difference in delirium occurrence in family intervention arms compared with nonintervention arms (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-10.02; P=0.270).

Conclusions: Pager alerts significantly reduced time to HELP enrollment, albeit without reducing delirium incidence in this pilot study. Family care partners spent substantial time at the bedside during the study period.

Background: Postoperative delirium is a common complication in older adults, associated with poor outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and higher health care costs. Older age is a strong predictor of delirium. Intraoperative burst suppression on the electroencephalogram (EEG) has also been linked to postoperative delirium and poor neurocognitive outcomes.

Methods: In this a secondary analysis of data from the Perioperative Anesthesia Neurocognitive Disorder Assessment-Geriatric (PANDA-G) observational study, the raw EEGs of 239 spine surgery patients were evaluated. Associations between delirium and age, device-generated burst suppression ratio, and visual detection of the raw EEG were compared.

Results: Demographics and anesthesia durations were similar in patients with and without delirium. There was a higher incidence of burst suppression identified by analysis of the raw EEG in the delirium group than in the no delirium group (73.45% vs. 50.9%; P=0.001) which appeared to be driven largely by a higher incidence of burst suppression during maintenance of anesthesia (67.2% vs. 46.3%; P=0.004). Burst suppression was more strongly associated with delirium than with age; estimated linear regression coefficient for burst suppression 0.182 (SE: 0.057; P=0.002) and for age 0.009 (SE: 0.005; P=0.082). There was no significant interaction between burst suppression and age (-0.512; SE: 0.390; P=0.190). Compared with visual detection of burst suppression, the burst suppression ratio overestimated burst suppression at low values, and underestimated burst suppression at high values.

Conclusion: Intraoperative burst suppression identified by visual analysis of the EEG was more strongly associated with delirium than age in older adults undergoing spine surgery. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these findings.

This systematic review aimed to identify and describe best practice for the intraoperative anesthetic management of patients undergoing emergent/urgent decompressive craniotomy or craniectomy for any indication. The PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles related to urgent/emergent craniotomy/craniectomy for intracranial hypertension or brain herniation. Only articles focusing on intraoperative anesthetic management were included; those investigating surgical or intensive care unit management were excluded. Nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified after screening 1885 abstracts and full text review of 276 articles. Six of the 9 included studies were prospective and 3 were retrospective, and included sample sizes ranging between 48 and 373 patients. All were single center studies. Three studies examined anesthetic technique (volatile vs. intravenous), 1 examined osmotic diuresis, 1 examined extubation in the operating room, 1 examined quality metrics, and 3 examined intracranial pressure and changes in vital sign. There was insufficient evidence to perform a meta-analysis. Overall, there was limited evidence regarding the anesthetic management of patients having urgent/emergent craniotomy or craniectomy for intracranial hypertension or herniation due to any cause.