Esther Mourão Nicoli, Frances Valéria Costa E Silva, Samara Gonçalves de Oliveira, Rosane Barreto Cardoso, Luciana Guimarães Assad, Glycia de Almeida Nogueira
Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to map the instruments for assessing the comfort of hospitalized older adults in the scientific literature, identifying those instruments validated and transculturally adapted to the realities of Brazil. Methods: This was a scoping review of 14 articles and a website retrieved from the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct/Elsevier, and gray literature (Oasisbr, Catalog of Theses and Dissertations [CAPES], OATD, BDBTD, and The Comfort Line). Results: Seventeen instruments for assessing the comfort of hospitalized older adults were mapped; however, none were specifically designed for this population, as they were originally intended for adults or individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. Among these, three have been validated and transculturally adapted to the Brazilian context. Conclusions: This study reveals the need for a specific instrument tailored for hospitalized older adults without neuropsychiatric conditions.
背景和目的:本研究的目的是对科学文献中用于评估住院老年人舒适度的工具进行梳理,找出那些经过验证并根据巴西实际情况进行了跨文化调整的工具。研究方法这是从以下数据库中检索到的 14 篇文章和一个网站的范围性综述:MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus、Science Direct/Elsevier,以及灰色文献(Oasisbr、Catalog of Theses and Dissertations [CAPES]、OATD、BDBTD 和 The Comfort Line)。结果:绘制了 17 种用于评估住院老年人舒适度的工具;但是,没有一种工具是专门为这一人群设计的,因为它们最初是为成年人或患有神经精神疾病的人设计的。在这些工具中,有三种已经过验证,并根据巴西国情进行了跨文化调整。结论:这项研究表明,有必要为无神经精神疾病的住院老年人量身定制专门的工具。
{"title":"Instruments to Assess the Comfort of Hospitalized Elderly People: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Esther Mourão Nicoli, Frances Valéria Costa E Silva, Samara Gonçalves de Oliveira, Rosane Barreto Cardoso, Luciana Guimarães Assad, Glycia de Almeida Nogueira","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0130","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to map the instruments for assessing the comfort of hospitalized older adults in the scientific literature, identifying those instruments validated and transculturally adapted to the realities of Brazil. <b>Methods:</b> This was a scoping review of 14 articles and a website retrieved from the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct/Elsevier, and gray literature (Oasisbr, Catalog of Theses and Dissertations [CAPES], OATD, BDBTD, and The Comfort Line). <b>Results:</b> Seventeen instruments for assessing the comfort of hospitalized older adults were mapped; however, none were specifically designed for this population, as they were originally intended for adults or individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. Among these, three have been validated and transculturally adapted to the Brazilian context. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study reveals the need for a specific instrument tailored for hospitalized older adults without neuropsychiatric conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"322-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141982563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ayodeji Olubunmi Ogunmuyiwa, Chinomso Ugochukwu Nwozichi, Mary Dioise Ramos, Olajumoke Oladoyin, Chinwe Okoli
Background and Purpose: Discharge readiness is an important aspect of quality care improvement but is poorly understood among clinicians. This study aims to develop and validate an abdominal surgery discharge readiness instrument (ASDRI). Methods: Through quantitative methods, ASDRI was crafted from qualitative exploration, literature review, and theoretical foundation. The psychometric analysis involved 344 patients with abdominal surgery aged 18 years and above using SmartPLS 4.0.9 software version. Results: The validated ASDRI contains both convergent and discriminant validities. The Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values for all the constructs were above the recommended cutoff point (AVE = .4) and demonstrated acceptable reliability (CA = .64-.936; CR = .81-.95). Conclusions: The ASDRI, comprising 28 items across five factors, emerges as a valid and reliable tool for assessing discharge readiness after abdominal surgery, emphasizing patient-centered discharge planning.
{"title":"Measuring Discharge Readiness: Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument for Patients After Abdominal Surgery.","authors":"Ayodeji Olubunmi Ogunmuyiwa, Chinomso Ugochukwu Nwozichi, Mary Dioise Ramos, Olajumoke Oladoyin, Chinwe Okoli","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0017","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Discharge readiness is an important aspect of quality care improvement but is poorly understood among clinicians. This study aims to develop and validate an abdominal surgery discharge readiness instrument (ASDRI). <b>Methods:</b> Through quantitative methods, ASDRI was crafted from qualitative exploration, literature review, and theoretical foundation. The psychometric analysis involved 344 patients with abdominal surgery aged 18 years and above using SmartPLS 4.0.9 software version. <b>Results:</b> The validated ASDRI contains both convergent and discriminant validities. The Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values for all the constructs were above the recommended cutoff point (<i>AVE</i> = .4) and demonstrated acceptable reliability (CA = .64-.936; CR = .81-.95). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ASDRI, comprising 28 items across five factors, emerges as a valid and reliable tool for assessing discharge readiness after abdominal surgery, emphasizing patient-centered discharge planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"391-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141982564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul W Scott, Cassandra M Godzik, Jonna L Morris, Eileen R Chasens, Catherine M Bender
Background and Purpose: This study evaluates the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in terms of factor structure and measurement invariance (MI). The sample included postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors (n = 101) and matched healthy controls (n = 60). Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed on PSQI's seven component scores. MI was tested between groups and across time using Bayes factor (BF). Results: Two factors were identified: sleep efficiency and perceived sleep quality. MI is evidenced between groups (BF < 0.007) and over time (BF > 150). Conclusions: PSQI scores with two subscales are comparable between postmenopausal BC survivors and controls over a 1-year period, providing some validation of PSQI for researching sleep quality in this population.
背景与目的:本研究从因子结构和测量不变量(MI)的角度对匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行了评估。样本包括绝经后乳腺癌(BC)幸存者(n = 101)和匹配的健康对照组(n = 60)。研究方法对 PSQI 的七个成分得分进行探索性因子分析 (EFA) 和确认性因子分析 (CFA)。使用贝叶斯因子(BF)对不同组间和不同时间段的 MI 进行检验。结果确定了两个因子:睡眠效率和感知睡眠质量。不同组间(BF < 0.007)和不同时间段(BF > 150)的 MI 均得到证实。结论绝经后 BC 幸存者和对照组在 1 年内的 PSQI 两个分量表得分相当,这在一定程度上验证了 PSQI 用于研究该人群的睡眠质量。
{"title":"Assessing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Between Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors and Controls.","authors":"Paul W Scott, Cassandra M Godzik, Jonna L Morris, Eileen R Chasens, Catherine M Bender","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0018","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> This study evaluates the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in terms of factor structure and measurement invariance (MI). The sample included postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors (<i>n</i> = 101) and matched healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 60). <b>Methods:</b> Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed on PSQI's seven component scores. MI was tested between groups and across time using Bayes factor (BF). <b>Results:</b> Two factors were identified: sleep efficiency and perceived sleep quality. MI is evidenced between groups (BF < 0.007) and over time (BF > 150). <b>Conclusions:</b> PSQI scores with two subscales are comparable between postmenopausal BC survivors and controls over a 1-year period, providing some validation of PSQI for researching sleep quality in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"414-424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pelin Calpbinici, Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak, Füsun Terzioğlu
Background: In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. Purpose: The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). Methods: The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ2) = 361.948, χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = .808, comparative fit index (CFI) = .941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .0317, and for the leaders' version: χ2 = 180.121, χ2/df = 1.896, RMSEA = .104, GFI = .809, CFI = .970, TLI = .962, and SRMR = .0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from r = .816 to r = .952 for the employees' version and from r = .922 to r = .968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was .98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's alpha of its subdimensions were .93 for working alliance, .96 for open communication, .97 for learning and development, and .96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .99, while the Cronbach's alpha of its subdimensions was found to be .93 for working alliance, .96 for open communication, .97 for learning and development, and .96 for progress and results. Conclusion: It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of a New Scale for Nurse Leaders: Coaching-Based Leadership Scale.","authors":"Pelin Calpbinici, Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak, Füsun Terzioğlu","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0028","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. <b>Purpose:</b> The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). <b>Methods:</b> The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. <b>Results:</b> The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) = 361.948, χ<sup>2</sup>/degrees of freedom (<i>df</i>) = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = .808, comparative fit index (CFI) = .941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .0317, and for the leaders' version: χ<sup>2</sup> = 180.121, χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 1.896, RMSEA = .104, GFI = .809, CFI = .970, TLI = .962, and SRMR = .0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from <i>r</i> = .816 to <i>r</i> = .952 for the employees' version and from <i>r</i> = .922 to <i>r</i> = .968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was .98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's alpha of its subdimensions were .93 for working alliance, .96 for open communication, .97 for learning and development, and .96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .99, while the Cronbach's alpha of its subdimensions was found to be .93 for working alliance, .96 for open communication, .97 for learning and development, and .96 for progress and results. <b>Conclusion:</b> It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"432-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Geneviève Laporte, Céline Gélinas, Christine Genest, Marilyn Aita
Background and Purpose: Family resilience in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a promising avenue for promoting parental mental health, yet no tool is available to assess it. This study aimed to develop a new scale to measure family resilience in French-speaking parents during the NICU hospitalization and evaluate content validation. Methods: This methodological study was conducted in Quebec and included two phases: (a) item development process and (b) content validity evaluation process using successive quantitative and qualitative methods. A total sample of 14 experts evaluated item clarity, relevance, and representativeness on 1-4 rating scales and provided qualitative feedback on scale characteristics. Results: An initial scale of 55 items was developed. Excellent content validity (Item Content Validity Index > .90) and consensus regarding item selection and scale presentation were achieved. Conclusions: This content-validated 55-item Communication, Organization, and Intrafamilial Beliefs in Neonatology (COCINL) scale should be psychometrically tested in the Quebec NICU parent population.
{"title":"Development and Content Validation of the Communication, Organization, and Intrafamilial Beliefs in Neonatology Scale for Family Resilience in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Geneviève Laporte, Céline Gélinas, Christine Genest, Marilyn Aita","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0040","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Family resilience in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a promising avenue for promoting parental mental health, yet no tool is available to assess it. This study aimed to develop a new scale to measure family resilience in French-speaking parents during the NICU hospitalization and evaluate content validation. <b>Methods:</b> This methodological study was conducted in Quebec and included two phases: (a) item development process and (b) content validity evaluation process using successive quantitative and qualitative methods. A total sample of 14 experts evaluated item clarity, relevance, and representativeness on 1-4 rating scales and provided qualitative feedback on scale characteristics. <b>Results:</b> An initial scale of 55 items was developed. Excellent content validity (Item Content Validity Index > .90) and consensus regarding item selection and scale presentation were achieved. <b>Conclusions:</b> This content-validated 55-item Communication, Organization, and Intrafamilial Beliefs in Neonatology (COCINL) scale should be psychometrically tested in the Quebec NICU parent population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"485-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comfort and Safety of Hospitalized Older Persons: Challenges for Nursing Care.","authors":"Esther Mourão Nicoli","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0055","DOIUrl":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"320-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144608575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and Purpose: This study was conducted to adapt the Medication Information Literacy Scale for Pregnant Women into Turkish. Methods: This study was designed as a methodological study, and the sample consisted of 279 pregnant women. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the fit indices were within acceptable ranges. For reliability evaluation, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha = .872), intraclass correlation coefficient (.872), Hotelling's T2 test (F = 21.252, p = .000), standard error of measurement (5.11 ≤ 7.9), and floor-ceiling effect analysis (min. frequency = 0.4%, max. frequency = 0.4%) were assessed. Conclusion: The Medication Information Literacy Scale for Pregnant Women, consisting of 5 subdimensions and 20 items, was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.
{"title":"Turkish Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study of the Medication Information Literacy Scale for Pregnant Women.","authors":"Ayşe Eminoğlu, Şirin Çelikkanat, Zeynep Güngörmüş","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2025-0015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> This study was conducted to adapt the Medication Information Literacy Scale for Pregnant Women into Turkish. <b>Methods:</b> This study was designed as a methodological study, and the sample consisted of 279 pregnant women. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the fit indices were within acceptable ranges. For reliability evaluation, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha = .872), intraclass correlation coefficient (.872), Hotelling's T<sup>2</sup> test (<i>F</i> = 21.252, <i>p</i> = .000), standard error of measurement (5.11 ≤ 7.9), and floor-ceiling effect analysis (min. frequency = 0.4%, max. frequency = 0.4%) were assessed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Medication Information Literacy Scale for Pregnant Women, consisting of 5 subdimensions and 20 items, was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Majid Bagheri, Sara Mehralizade, Morteza Shiryani, Hamid Sharif-Nia, Saeed Ghasempour, Ali Abbasi
Background and Purpose: Due to the absence of a specific tool for assessing surgical anxiety in Iranian patients undergoing cosmetic surgery, this study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) in these patients. Methods: A methodological study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the SAQ. Results: In the exploratory factor analysis, two items were removed, resulting in a final version of 15 items across three factors that accounted for 48.3% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit for the model obtained (minimum discrepancy function divided by degrees of freedom = 2.84, root-mean-square error of approximation =07, and goodness-of-fit index =922). All factors demonstrated favorable internal consistency and stability. Conclusion: The aforementioned questionnaire demonstrated desirable psychometric properties for measuring surgical anxiety in Iranian cosmetic surgery candidates.
{"title":"Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Version of the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Cosmetic Surgery.","authors":"Majid Bagheri, Sara Mehralizade, Morteza Shiryani, Hamid Sharif-Nia, Saeed Ghasempour, Ali Abbasi","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2025-0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Due to the absence of a specific tool for assessing surgical anxiety in Iranian patients undergoing cosmetic surgery, this study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) in these patients. <b>Methods:</b> A methodological study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the SAQ. <b>Results:</b> In the exploratory factor analysis, two items were removed, resulting in a final version of 15 items across three factors that accounted for 48.3% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit for the model obtained (minimum discrepancy function divided by degrees of freedom <i>=</i> 2.84, root-mean-square error of approximation <i>=</i>07, and goodness-of-fit index <i>=</i>922). All factors demonstrated favorable internal consistency and stability. <b>Conclusion:</b> The aforementioned questionnaire demonstrated desirable psychometric properties for measuring surgical anxiety in Iranian cosmetic surgery candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Basheer Mahmoud Al-Zu'bi, Amal M T Ababneh, Nour Ali Alrida, Mohammad Etoom, Sara Ali, Alaa Fraihat
Background and Purpose: Burnout among midwives is an increasing concern due to the high emotional demands of their profession, exposure to traumatic events, and challenging workplace conditions. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) in practicing Jordanian midwives. Method: The validity, reliability, and factor structure of the CBI were assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results: The EFA identified a well-fitting three-factor model comprising personal, work, and client-related dimensions, which explained a substantial portion of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct validity of this three-factor structure, with model fit indices within acceptable ranges. Reliability analysis demonstrated strong internal consistency for the overall scale and subdimensions, confirming the robustness of the burnout assessment instrument. Conclusion: The Arabic CBI is a suitable instrument for assessing burnout.
{"title":"Arabic Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: Psychometric Evaluation in a Midwife Population.","authors":"Basheer Mahmoud Al-Zu'bi, Amal M T Ababneh, Nour Ali Alrida, Mohammad Etoom, Sara Ali, Alaa Fraihat","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2025-0041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Burnout among midwives is an increasing concern due to the high emotional demands of their profession, exposure to traumatic events, and challenging workplace conditions. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) in practicing Jordanian midwives. <b>Method:</b> The validity, reliability, and factor structure of the CBI were assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). <b>Results:</b> The EFA identified a well-fitting three-factor model comprising personal, work, and client-related dimensions, which explained a substantial portion of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct validity of this three-factor structure, with model fit indices within acceptable ranges. Reliability analysis demonstrated strong internal consistency for the overall scale and subdimensions, confirming the robustness of the burnout assessment instrument. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Arabic CBI is a suitable instrument for assessing burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammed ALBashtawy, Mohammad Abuadas, Sanaa Rawashdeh, Zainab Albikawi, Salam Bani Hani, Abeer Aseeri, Zaid ALBashtawy, Omar Al Omari, Sa'd ALBashtawy, Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Zaid Sami Jaradat
Background and Purpose: The importance of corneal donation is related to the global burden of corneal blindness. This study aims to develop and validate a tool to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Jordanian nursing students toward corneal donation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Results: The questionnaire demonstrated robust psychometric properties, with item difficulty indices ranging from .40 to .71 and discrimination indices from .30 to .59. Reliability was confirmed with a KR-20 value of .80. The attitude questionnaire revealed a single-factor structure, with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .86). Nursing students exhibited good levels of knowledge about corneal anatomy, transplantation procedures, and donation benefits. Conclusion: The validated tool is a reliable and effective instrument for assessing knowledge and attitudes toward corneal donation among nursing students.
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess Jordanian Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Corneal Donation.","authors":"Mohammed ALBashtawy, Mohammad Abuadas, Sanaa Rawashdeh, Zainab Albikawi, Salam Bani Hani, Abeer Aseeri, Zaid ALBashtawy, Omar Al Omari, Sa'd ALBashtawy, Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Zaid Sami Jaradat","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2025-0012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The importance of corneal donation is related to the global burden of corneal blindness. This study aims to develop and validate a tool to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Jordanian nursing students toward corneal donation. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted. <b>Results:</b> The questionnaire demonstrated robust psychometric properties, with item difficulty indices ranging from .40 to .71 and discrimination indices from .30 to .59. Reliability was confirmed with a KR-20 value of .80. The attitude questionnaire revealed a single-factor structure, with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .86). Nursing students exhibited good levels of knowledge about corneal anatomy, transplantation procedures, and donation benefits. <b>Conclusion:</b> The validated tool is a reliable and effective instrument for assessing knowledge and attitudes toward corneal donation among nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}