Journal of nursing measurement最新文献

Background and Purpose: The scale was developed to assess the attitudes of young adults aged 18-25 years toward sexual health. Method: The scale was methodologically developed based on the instrument development guidelines proposed by Robert F. DeVellis. The sample consisted of 721 young individuals in Turkey. Results: In the exploratory factor analysis, a scale with seven subdimensions explained 56.29% of the total variance was obtained. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated the scale had acceptable fit indices (χ² statistic divided by the degrees of freedom = 2.553, root-mean-square error of approximation = .066). The total Cronbach's α value of the scale was determined to be .94. Conclusion: The analyses conducted demonstrated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for determining young adults' attitudes toward sexual health.

Background and purpose: Assessment of digital health literacy should be a major concern for health care providers. We aimed to translate and adapt the Digital Health Literacy (DHL) Instrument into Brazilian Portuguese and examine the content validity for individuals with heart failure (HF). Methods: The instrument was translated, back translated, and evaluated by a panel of six experts regarding linguistic equivalences. An agreement analysis was performed, with values ≥80% considered acceptable. The experts then evaluated clarity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item. A CVI ≥.83 was considered acceptable. The expert's opinions were also evaluated through the modified kappa coefficient for content validity studies. Values >.74 were considered excellent. The content validity ratio (CVR) was also calculated. A critical value of CVR of 1.00 was determined. Cognitive testing (understanding the meaning of each item and their respective answers) was performed with 33 individuals with HF. Results: The adapted version obtained an agreement of ≥83.3% for each item on linguistic equivalences. Total CVI was ≥0.83, kappa values for each item were >.74, and the CVR values were 1.00 for all items. After two rounds of evaluation, all patients were able to understand the items and response scale. Conclusions: The Brazilian version has satisfactory evidence of linguistic and content validity to measure DHL in patients with HF. Additional psychometric properties will be tested in the country.

Background and Purpose: In nursing education, students are often expected to make presentations. This study aimed to adapt the Oral Presentation Evaluation Scale (OPES) into the Turkish language and investigate its psychometric properties. Methods: This methodological study comprised 311 undergraduate students. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), coefficient α, and item-total correlation. Results: The item-total score correlation coefficients of the scale were between 0.636 and 0.787, and according to the CFA, the factor loads of all items varied between 0.533 and 0.846. The chi-square/standard deviation value, goodness of fit index, comparative fit index, normed fit index, and root mean square error of approximation were 2.056, 0.928, 0.973, 0.949, and 0.058, respectively. Coefficient α value was 0.951. According to the results of EFA, the scale consists of a two-factor structure in Turkish culture. Conclusions: The OPES is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the oral presentations of Turkish nursing students.

Background and Purpose: The aims of this study are as follows: to adapt and validate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) adapted to the nursing home environment across seven Spanish-speaking countries and to cross-culturally adapt the Scale of the Nursing Work Index with nurses from seven countries. Methods: Adaptation process and psychometric validation of the instrument included translation and back-translation, content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Results: A total of 134 nursing homes belonging to the same religious order were randomly selected from seven Spanish-speaking countries with a sample of 378 nurses. The exploratory factor analysis explained a five-factor structure (56% of the explained variance) with adequate goodness-of-fit indices in the final factor solution. Conclusions: The validation process indicates that the Spanish language version of the PES-NWI with five factors and 31 items, for long-term care facilities for the elderly, is valid and reliable in its current version and can be used to measure the environment of nurses working in clinical practice in Spanish-speaking nursing homes.

Background and Purpose: A sound translation is complex but necessary to provide a valid patient-reported questionnaire. The aim of this study was therefore to translate, culturally adapt, and linguistically validate the 17-item Wound-Quality of Life (Wound-QoL) questionnaire from English to Norwegian. Methods: For translation and cultural adaption of the Wound-QoL, we followed the methods described by the ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (formerly, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research), Messaging Application Programming Interface Research Institute, and recommendations from literature reviews. Results: Differences in the language semantics and syntax caused challenges in the translation. The cognitive debriefing interviews revealed some irrelevant items related to personal preferences. Conclusions: This study provides a questionnaire that can improve the quality of clinical care and promote research and valuable knowledge to other researchers translating the Wound-QoL and similar questionnaires.

Background and Purpose: Clinical judgement (CJ) is a complex variable that utilizes higher level cognitive processing related to clinical reasoning, decision-making, and critical thinking. As CJ is a vital aspect of nursing, the current study evaluated the extent to which the current NCLEX item bank assesses CJ and a critical aspect of measuring new constructs using a dimensionality analysis. Methods: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis was completed to evaluate the factor structure of items written to the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (CJMM) that directly measures CJ with respect to extant NCLEX items. Results: Results indicated that scenarios written using the CJMM were found to have a unidimensional structure. Conclusions: The results suggested that the scenarios written with the CJMM could be scaled concurrently with the current NCLEX items.

Background and Purpose: The Compassionate Care Assessment Tool was designed to evaluate the compassionate care characteristics of nurses. The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. Methods: This study was a methodological type of study. Data were collected from 300 patients hospitalized in different services. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 and LISREL 8.7. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: The content validity index of the scale was 0.94. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on the Turkish form showed that all items fell within the subscales of the original scale. and that their factor loads were between .37 and .78. The coefficient α of the scale was .897. Conclusions: The tool is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating compassionate care given by nurses.

Background and Purpose: To translate and adapt the Self-Administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument from English to European Portuguese and explore its reliability and validity among undergraduate nursing students in Portugal. Methods: The study was divided into two phases. First, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation followed Beaton's guidelines, with a pretesting of the final version with 30 students. The validation process used the content validity index with a minimum of 75% agreement between experts and coefficient α for internal consistency. The second step provided the results of the principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, which were performed to study the overall fit of the model and item correlations. The STROBE checklist was used. Results: The Portuguese version, Instrumento de Auto-Avaliação da Saúde do Pé (IAASP), showed an overall acceptable evidence regarding content validity and internal consistency. The factor analysis results suggested removing the "Foot pain" dimension from the original scale. Conclusions: IAASP is suggested to maintain the original 22-item structure, with four domains, "Skin health," "Nail health," "Foot structure," and "Foot pain," being an initial reliable version with interest to measure the current foot health of nursing students. Future studies should contribute to IAASP's continuous improvement.

Background and Purpose: Since self-efficacy is a significant factor influencing the self-management of chronic diseases, including thalassemia major, it is considered a key concept in chronic diseases. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate the self-efficacy scale for patients with thalassemia major. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study conducted in two phases. In phase 1, a qualitative study with a conventional content analysis design was conducted. In phase 2, which was a quantitative one, the psychometric analysis of the instrument's phrases was done. Results: The instrument has 35 items and 3 factors. The coefficient α and the intraclass correlation coefficient were .93 and .94, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms the validity and reliability of the Beta Thalassemia Major Self-Efficacy Scale. With this tool, nurses can evaluate the self-efficacy of patients with thalassemia major.

Background and Purpose: Although the Haitian population in the United States continues to grow, there is a lack of instruments in Haitian Creole to assess risk factors associated with poor mental health such as migration-related stress. This study described the translation of the Demands of Immigration Scale (DIS) and evaluated psychometric properties, meaning equivalence, and understandability of the Haitian Creole/English DIS. Methods: I applied the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy translation procedures and recruited 76 first-generation Haitian immigrants to pilot test the DIS. Results: Reliability was strong (α > .93). Meaning equivalence was maintained (r = .979), 75% understood both DIS versions equally, and 80% rated the translation as excellent/good. The DIS significantly correlated with gender, income, age, age at migration, English fluency, and depression. Conclusions: The DIS can reliably identify immigration-related social determinants of mental health and is ready for use in Haitian Creole.