Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity最新文献_第5页

Digital reengineering: A tribute to fashion or a management paradigm shift? 数字化再造：是对时尚的致敬还是管理模式的转变？

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100692

Nataliya Chukhray, Kateryna Yarmola

The article is devoted to the development of theoretical foundations and practical recommendations for “digital reengineering”. It addresses contradictions and gaps in the modern understanding of this concept, leading the authors to propose their own definition. Unlike classical interpretations, digital reengineering is presented as a transformation process where IT serves as the core driver, rather than an auxiliary tool, with a particular emphasis on its application in the tourism sector. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematization of existing approaches to interpreting digital reengineering and in conceptualizing its role for tourism enterprises. The authors integrate consumer expectations with technological capabilities by combining primary data (a survey of 196 respondents on consumer attitudes and expectations regarding the digitalization of tourism services) with secondary data (an analysis of digital solutions already applied in the sector). This methodological approach enables the design of more effective and personalized tourism products. Based on the Ukrainian tourism market, the authors developed and tested a methodology for reengineering digital business processes that enables managers to enhance customer communication, offer personalized service options, and foster customer satisfaction and loyalty. The findings demonstrate that applying digital reengineering can generate both financial and reputational advantages for tourism enterprises. The main limitation of the research is the regional and qualitative nature of the sample, which points to the need for further studies across different industries, broader geographic contexts, and with quantitative verification, while also considering varying perceptions of digital technologies in tourism.

本文致力于为“数字化再造”提供理论基础和实践建议。它解决了对这一概念的现代理解中的矛盾和差距，导致作者提出了自己的定义。与传统的解释不同，数字化再造是一个转型过程，其中IT作为核心驱动力，而不是辅助工具，并特别强调其在旅游部门的应用。本研究的科学新颖之处在于将现有解读数字化再造的方法系统化，并概念化其对旅游企业的作用。作者通过将原始数据（对196名受访者进行的关于旅游服务数字化的消费者态度和期望的调查）与辅助数据（对该行业已应用的数字化解决方案的分析）相结合，将消费者期望与技术能力结合起来。这种方法论方法可以设计出更有效、更个性化的旅游产品。基于乌克兰旅游市场，作者开发并测试了一种重新设计数字业务流程的方法，使管理人员能够加强客户沟通，提供个性化服务选择，并提高客户满意度和忠诚度。研究结果表明，应用数字化再造可以为旅游企业带来财务和声誉优势。该研究的主要局限性在于样本的区域性和定性性质，这表明需要在不同行业、更广泛的地理背景下进行进一步研究，并进行定量验证，同时还要考虑到对旅游业中数字技术的不同看法。

{"title":"Digital reengineering: A tribute to fashion or a management paradigm shift?","authors":"Nataliya Chukhray, Kateryna Yarmola","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100692","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article is devoted to the development of theoretical foundations and practical recommendations for “digital reengineering”. It addresses contradictions and gaps in the modern understanding of this concept, leading the authors to propose their own definition. Unlike classical interpretations, digital reengineering is presented as a transformation process where IT serves as the core driver, rather than an auxiliary tool, with a particular emphasis on its application in the tourism sector. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematization of existing approaches to interpreting digital reengineering and in conceptualizing its role for tourism enterprises. The authors integrate consumer expectations with technological capabilities by combining primary data (a survey of 196 respondents on consumer attitudes and expectations regarding the digitalization of tourism services) with secondary data (an analysis of digital solutions already applied in the sector). This methodological approach enables the design of more effective and personalized tourism products. Based on the Ukrainian tourism market, the authors developed and tested a methodology for reengineering digital business processes that enables managers to enhance customer communication, offer personalized service options, and foster customer satisfaction and loyalty. The findings demonstrate that applying digital reengineering can generate both financial and reputational advantages for tourism enterprises. The main limitation of the research is the regional and qualitative nature of the sample, which points to the need for further studies across different industries, broader geographic contexts, and with quantitative verification, while also considering varying perceptions of digital technologies in tourism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100692"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mergers and acquisitions as drivers of business model innovation in the U.S. medical device industry: Evidence from 101 Cases (2018–2024) 并购是美国医疗器械行业商业模式创新的驱动力：来自101个案例的证据（2018-2024）

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100680

Dongwoo Kim , Kwangsoo Shin

The objective of this study is to investigate whether Mergers and Acquisitions (hereafter, M&A) can promote Business Model Innovation (hereafter, BMI) in the medical device industry by examining 101 M&A cases in the U.S. from 2018 to 2024. Medical device firms have strived to achieve accelerated growth by innovating their business models. Despite the device firms’ significant efforts to deliver additional value to stakeholders, many of these firms find themselves with their backs against the wall. While a vast amount of research exists on the topic of BMI, there are very few studies specifically focused on the BMI of medical device companies. This study aims to understand how established medical device companies drive their BMI by leveraging M&A. To identify emerging M&A trends in major markets such as the U.S., this research adopts a case study approach as an appropriate method to explore how each device company is pursuing innovation in its business model. The findings of this study suggest that established medical device companies in the U.S. continue to achieve sustainable competitive growth by actively pursuing M&A in a dynamic market landscape.

本研究的目的是通过对2018年至2024年美国101个并购案例的分析，探讨并购（以下简称并购）是否能促进医疗器械行业的商业模式创新（以下简称BMI）。医疗器械公司一直在努力通过创新商业模式来实现加速增长。尽管这些设备公司在为利益相关者提供额外价值方面做出了巨大努力，但其中许多公司发现自己陷入了困境。虽然有大量关于BMI的研究，但很少有研究专门针对医疗器械公司的BMI。本研究旨在了解已建立的医疗器械公司如何利用M&；A来推动他们的BMI。为了确定美国等主要市场的新兴并购趋势，本研究采用案例研究法作为适当的方法来探索每个设备公司如何在其商业模式中追求创新。本研究的结果表明，在动态的市场格局中，美国成熟的医疗器械公司通过积极追求并购，继续实现可持续的竞争性增长。

{"title":"Mergers and acquisitions as drivers of business model innovation in the U.S. medical device industry: Evidence from 101 Cases (2018–2024)","authors":"Dongwoo Kim , Kwangsoo Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100680","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100680","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study is to investigate whether Mergers and Acquisitions (hereafter, M&A) can promote Business Model Innovation (hereafter, BMI) in the medical device industry by examining 101 M&A cases in the U.S. from 2018 to 2024. Medical device firms have strived to achieve accelerated growth by innovating their business models. Despite the device firms’ significant efforts to deliver additional value to stakeholders, many of these firms find themselves with their backs against the wall. While a vast amount of research exists on the topic of BMI, there are very few studies specifically focused on the BMI of medical device companies. This study aims to understand how established medical device companies drive their BMI by leveraging M&A. To identify emerging M&A trends in major markets such as the U.S., this research adopts a case study approach as an appropriate method to explore how each device company is pursuing innovation in its business model. The findings of this study suggest that established medical device companies in the U.S. continue to achieve sustainable competitive growth by actively pursuing M&A in a dynamic market landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The role of digital twin technology in enhancing sustainable aviation transition: A state-of-the-art review and future direction 数字孪生技术在促进可持续航空转型中的作用：最新进展和未来方向

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100693

Bright Appiah Adu-Gyamfi

The aviation industry faces mounting pressure to align with international decarbonization goals, yet its digital sustainability efforts remain fragmented and narrowly focused. Digital twin (DT) technology has emerged as a critical enabler of real-time system modeling, predictive analysis, and operational optimization; however, its application in aviation has predominantly focused on isolated domains, such as maintenance and component design. This state-of-the-art review critically examines the current landscape of DT adoption across aviation, highlighting its traditional roles and identifying key limitations in addressing holistic sustainability objectives. Drawing insights from advanced implementations in adjacent sectors, including energy, automotive, maritime, and smart cities, the review proposes a comprehensive, multi-domain digital twin framework for sustainable aviation. The framework encompasses six interrelated domains: fuel and propulsion systems, lifecycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), certification support, sustainable airframe design, operational optimization, and end-of-life management. Through this integrated lens, DTs are positioned not merely as tools for performance enhancement but as strategic infrastructures capable of embedding environmental intelligence across the aviation lifecycle. This work synthesizes academic advances and industrial progress between 2010 and 2025, providing a critical foundation for future digital transformation initiatives in aviation. It advocates for the development of interoperable, lifecycle-aware DT architectures to accelerate the sector’s transition toward net-zero emissions and sustainable value creation.

航空业面临着与国际脱碳目标保持一致的越来越大的压力，但其数字可持续发展的努力仍然是分散和狭隘的。数字孪生（DT）技术已经成为实时系统建模、预测分析和操作优化的关键推动者；然而，其在航空领域的应用主要集中在维修和部件设计等孤立领域。这篇最新的综述批判性地审视了整个航空业采用DT的现状，强调了其传统作用，并确定了在实现整体可持续性目标方面的关键限制。借鉴能源、汽车、海事和智慧城市等相关领域的先进实施经验，该报告提出了一个全面的、多领域的可持续航空数字孪生框架。该框架包括六个相互关联的领域：燃料和推进系统、生命周期可持续性评估（LCSA）、认证支持、可持续机身设计、操作优化和寿命终止管理。通过这一集成镜头，dt不仅被定位为提高性能的工具，而且被定位为能够在整个航空生命周期中嵌入环境智能的战略基础设施。这项工作综合了2010年至2025年间的学术进展和工业进步，为未来航空业的数字化转型举措奠定了重要基础。它倡导开发可互操作的、具有生命周期意识的DT架构，以加速该行业向净零排放和可持续价值创造的过渡。

{"title":"The role of digital twin technology in enhancing sustainable aviation transition: A state-of-the-art review and future direction","authors":"Bright Appiah Adu-Gyamfi","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100693","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100693","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aviation industry faces mounting pressure to align with international decarbonization goals, yet its digital sustainability efforts remain fragmented and narrowly focused. Digital twin (DT) technology has emerged as a critical enabler of real-time system modeling, predictive analysis, and operational optimization; however, its application in aviation has predominantly focused on isolated domains, such as maintenance and component design. This state-of-the-art review critically examines the current landscape of DT adoption across aviation, highlighting its traditional roles and identifying key limitations in addressing holistic sustainability objectives. Drawing insights from advanced implementations in adjacent sectors, including energy, automotive, maritime, and smart cities, the review proposes a comprehensive, multi-domain digital twin framework for sustainable aviation. The framework encompasses six interrelated domains: fuel and propulsion systems, lifecycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), certification support, sustainable airframe design, operational optimization, and end-of-life management. Through this integrated lens, DTs are positioned not merely as tools for performance enhancement but as strategic infrastructures capable of embedding environmental intelligence across the aviation lifecycle. This work synthesizes academic advances and industrial progress between 2010 and 2025, providing a critical foundation for future digital transformation initiatives in aviation. It advocates for the development of interoperable, lifecycle-aware DT architectures to accelerate the sector’s transition toward net-zero emissions and sustainable value creation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"12 1","pages":"Article 100693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Application of sustainable infrastructure criteria at publicly owned infrastructure management companies 可持续基础设施标准在公营基础设施管理公司的应用

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100689

Kustova Ieva , Hudenko Justina , Stefano Ricci , Lace Natalja

Public infrastructure faces rising pressures from climate change and other environmental factors, requiring it to mitigate negative impacts and adapt to diverse social needs. The United Nations (hereinafter – UN) Sustainable Development Goals have set multiple objectives to be achieved by 2030, the Paris Agreement requires limiting global warming to a certain level, and the European Union, in its Green Deal policy package and the follow-up Clean Industry Deal package, has established its ambition to become climate-neutral by 2050 and invest in this direction. These targets require construction and operation of sustainable infrastructure, which may facilitate achievement of economic, environmental, and social goals on equal terms. While existing research has defined the characteristics of sustainable infrastructure, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their practical implementation and strategies to promote adoption. This paper examines how various public infrastructure managers (state- or municipality-owned companies) across the energy (electricity and heating), transport (air and rail), and water management sectors apply sustainable infrastructure criteria in their operations as well as the reasoning behind their approach. This study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including content analysis of 30 reports and structured interviews with 11 experts. The results of the research demonstrate that the companies do consider certain sustainability aspects in their infrastructure development decisions; however, they mostly focus on short- to medium-term benefits rather than long-term gains and radical improvements of their infrastructures and the services they enable. Specifically, resilience to diverse external impacts (including climate hazards) and timely assessment of future risks and their mitigation are rarely considered. The paper highlights potential solutions for that through the development of a decision-making model that encompasses both outputs (solutions to current short- and medium-term issues and related benefits) and outcomes (long-term impacts and radical changes to the infrastructure systems and their service models).

公共基础设施面临着气候变化和其他环境因素带来的越来越大的压力，要求其减轻负面影响并适应多样化的社会需求。联合国（以下简称“联合国”）可持续发展目标设定了到2030年要实现的多个目标，《巴黎协定》要求将全球变暖限制在一定水平，欧盟在其《绿色协议》一揽子政策和后续《清洁产业协议》一揽子政策中确立了到2050年实现气候中和的雄心，并在这方面进行了投资。这些目标要求建设和运营可持续的基础设施，这可能有助于在平等的条件下实现经济、环境和社会目标。虽然现有的研究已经定义了可持续基础设施的特征，但在实际实施和促进采用的战略方面，仍然存在重大的知识差距。本文研究了能源（电力和供暖）、交通（航空和铁路）和水管理部门的各种公共基础设施管理者（国有或市政所有的公司）如何在其运营中应用可持续基础设施标准，以及其方法背后的原因。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法，包括对30份报告的内容分析和对11位专家的结构化访谈。研究结果表明，公司在基础设施发展决策中确实考虑了某些可持续性方面；然而，它们大多侧重于短期到中期的利益，而不是长期收益和根本改善其基础设施及其所能提供的服务。具体而言，很少考虑对各种外部影响（包括气候灾害）的复原力和对未来风险的及时评估及其缓解措施。本文通过开发一个决策模型强调了解决这一问题的潜在方案，该模型既包括产出（解决当前短期和中期问题以及相关利益），也包括结果（对基础设施系统及其服务模式的长期影响和根本性变化）。

{"title":"Application of sustainable infrastructure criteria at publicly owned infrastructure management companies","authors":"Kustova Ieva , Hudenko Justina , Stefano Ricci , Lace Natalja","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100689","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100689","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public infrastructure faces rising pressures from climate change and other environmental factors, requiring it to mitigate negative impacts and adapt to diverse social needs. The United Nations (hereinafter – UN) Sustainable Development Goals have set multiple objectives to be achieved by 2030, the Paris Agreement requires limiting global warming to a certain level, and the European Union, in its Green Deal policy package and the follow-up Clean Industry Deal package, has established its ambition to become climate-neutral by 2050 and invest in this direction. These targets require construction and operation of sustainable infrastructure, which may facilitate achievement of economic, environmental, and social goals on equal terms. While existing research has defined the characteristics of sustainable infrastructure, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their practical implementation and strategies to promote adoption. This paper examines how various public infrastructure managers (state- or municipality-owned companies) across the energy (electricity and heating), transport (air and rail), and water management sectors apply sustainable infrastructure criteria in their operations as well as the reasoning behind their approach. This study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including content analysis of 30 reports and structured interviews with 11 experts. The results of the research demonstrate that the companies do consider certain sustainability aspects in their infrastructure development decisions; however, they mostly focus on short- to medium-term benefits rather than long-term gains and radical improvements of their infrastructures and the services they enable. Specifically, resilience to diverse external impacts (including climate hazards) and timely assessment of future risks and their mitigation are rarely considered. The paper highlights potential solutions for that through the development of a decision-making model that encompasses both outputs (solutions to current short- and medium-term issues and related benefits) and outcomes (long-term impacts and radical changes to the infrastructure systems and their service models).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100689"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sustainable mobility system design methodology 可持续移动系统设计方法论

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100687

Hari Kumar Suberi

This study develops a conceptual framework to assess sustainable mobility system design, addressing methodological gaps in the analysis of non-deterministic system behaviour. Using the Analysis–Projection–Synthesis (APS) approach in conjunction with the Vester Sensitivity Model, the system is evaluated across 22 global variables: infrastructure, technology, fuel and energy security, institutional capacity, spatial dynamics, accessibility, mobility services, accident resilience, investment, operating costs, economic development, environmental pollution, safety, enabling conditions, cultural values, aesthetics, mobility awareness, participatory culture, justice, political power, rural–urban dynamics, and human well-being. The extensive system scrutiny (projection and synthesis) simulated with the help of Vester Sensitivity Model shows the global variables (Economic development, Mobility service, Enabling condition) leverages the scrutinized system to sustainable mobility. However, for the designed system to be sustainable, current mobility system requires transformation to service centric design fuelled by renewable energy sources which needs to be enabled through behaviour correction of mobility user. The system reaches its saturation in every 15-simulation round which is bound in the negative feedback cycle indicating it can be qualified as self-regulating system. The study presents the conceptual methodological position where empirical grounding is left for future research on a contextual basis.

本研究开发了一个概念性框架来评估可持续移动系统设计，解决非确定性系统行为分析中的方法差距。利用分析-投影-综合（APS）方法结合Vester敏感性模型，对该系统进行了22个全局变量的评估：基础设施、技术、燃料和能源安全、机构能力、空间动态、可达性、移动服务、事故恢复力、投资、运营成本、经济发展、环境污染、安全、有利条件、文化价值、美学、移动意识、参与性文化、正义、政治权力、城乡动态和人类福祉。在Vester敏感性模型的帮助下，模拟了广泛的系统审查（预测和综合），表明全球变量（经济发展，移动服务，使能条件）使审查系统具有可持续的流动性。然而，为了使所设计的系统具有可持续性，当前的移动系统需要转变为以服务为中心的设计，以可再生能源为燃料，这需要通过移动用户的行为纠正来实现。系统在每15轮模拟中达到饱和，并被束缚在负反馈循环中，可以称为自调节系统。该研究提出了概念上的方法论立场，在此基础上，实证基础为未来的研究留下了背景基础。

{"title":"Sustainable mobility system design methodology","authors":"Hari Kumar Suberi","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a conceptual framework to assess sustainable mobility system design, addressing methodological gaps in the analysis of non-deterministic system behaviour. Using the Analysis–Projection–Synthesis (APS) approach in conjunction with the Vester Sensitivity Model, the system is evaluated across 22 global variables: infrastructure, technology, fuel and energy security, institutional capacity, spatial dynamics, accessibility, mobility services, accident resilience, investment, operating costs, economic development, environmental pollution, safety, enabling conditions, cultural values, aesthetics, mobility awareness, participatory culture, justice, political power, rural–urban dynamics, and human well-being. The extensive system scrutiny (projection and synthesis) simulated with the help of Vester Sensitivity Model shows the global variables (Economic development, Mobility service, Enabling condition) leverages the scrutinized system to sustainable mobility. However, for the designed system to be sustainable, current mobility system requires transformation to service centric design fuelled by renewable energy sources which needs to be enabled through behaviour correction of mobility user. The system reaches its saturation in every 15-simulation round which is bound in the negative feedback cycle indicating it can be qualified as self-regulating system. The study presents the conceptual methodological position where empirical grounding is left for future research on a contextual basis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100687"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Research design unlocked! Roadmapping for integration of paradigms, strategies, and tools 研究设计解锁！整合范例、策略和工具的路线图

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100688

Sepehr Ghazinoory , Mahshid G. Zadegan , Robert Phaal

Effective research design is crucial for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings. While existing frameworks, models, and typologies offer valuable guidance, they often have limitations such as overemphasizing or oversimplifying philosophical foundations, inadequate integration between design layers, limited flexibility, and poor communication of methodological orientations to stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper introduces the novel Research Design Roadmapping framework. Inspired by roadmap structures, it is organized into five distinct layers. Layers sequentially guide researchers from defining philosophical paradigmsto the Research Purpose and Question Layer, Research Strategies, Data Analysis Methods Layer, and practical Data Collection Tools. This structure ensures clarity, coherence, and systematic methodological decision-making at each stage. The Research Design Roadmap emphasizes both vertical integration—aligning decisions within each design layer—and horizontal integration—ensuring coherence across different design components. Its flexibility is demonstrated through adaptability to researchers of varying levels. Additionally, two case studies are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the Research Design Roadmap by applying it to develop real research inquiries. The Research Design Roadmap has the potential to transform research design practices by providing a comprehensive, adaptable, and transparent framework, thereby enhancing the overall integrity and effectiveness of research projects.

有效的研究设计对于保证研究结果的信度和效度至关重要。虽然现有的框架、模型和类型学提供了有价值的指导，但它们通常有局限性，例如过度强调或过度简化哲学基础、设计层之间的不充分集成、有限的灵活性，以及与涉众之间方法论方向的不良沟通。为了解决这些挑战，本文介绍了新的研究设计路线图框架。受路线图结构的启发，它被组织成五个不同的层。层序引导研究者从定义哲学范式到研究目的和问题层、研究策略层、数据分析方法层和实际数据收集工具。这种结构确保了每个阶段的清晰、连贯和系统的方法学决策。研究设计路线图强调垂直整合（在每个设计层内调整决策）和水平整合（确保不同设计组件之间的一致性）。它的灵活性体现在对不同层次研究人员的适应性上。此外，本文还提出了两个案例研究，通过将研究设计路线图应用于实际研究调查来说明其有效性。研究设计路线图有潜力通过提供一个全面的、适应性强的、透明的框架来改变研究设计实践，从而提高研究项目的整体完整性和有效性。

{"title":"Research design unlocked! Roadmapping for integration of paradigms, strategies, and tools","authors":"Sepehr Ghazinoory , Mahshid G. Zadegan , Robert Phaal","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100688","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective research design is crucial for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings. While existing frameworks, models, and typologies offer valuable guidance, they often have limitations such as overemphasizing or oversimplifying philosophical foundations, inadequate integration between design layers, limited flexibility, and poor communication of methodological orientations to stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper introduces the novel Research Design Roadmapping framework. Inspired by roadmap structures, it is organized into five distinct layers. Layers sequentially guide researchers from defining philosophical paradigmsto the Research Purpose and Question Layer, Research Strategies, Data Analysis Methods Layer, and practical Data Collection Tools. This structure ensures clarity, coherence, and systematic methodological decision-making at each stage. The Research Design Roadmap emphasizes both vertical integration—aligning decisions within each design layer—and horizontal integration—ensuring coherence across different design components. Its flexibility is demonstrated through adaptability to researchers of varying levels. Additionally, two case studies are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the Research Design Roadmap by applying it to develop real research inquiries. The Research Design Roadmap has the potential to transform research design practices by providing a comprehensive, adaptable, and transparent framework, thereby enhancing the overall integrity and effectiveness of research projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100688"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From awareness to action: Understanding the role of economic costs and perceived convenience in tourist mobility decisions 从意识到行动：了解经济成本和感知便利在旅游出行决策中的作用

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100682

Taiwo Temitope Lasisi , Marymagdaline Enowmbi Tarkang , M. Omar Parvez , Ahmet Can Şenlik , Kayode Kolawole Eluwole

This study investigates tourists’ adoption of sustainable mobility by integrating behavioral theories with open-innovation dynamics. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Expectancy–Value Theory (EVT), Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research examines how economic cost (ECI), awareness of sustainable options (ASO), individual sustainability values (ISV), and perceived convenience (PC) shape the tourist adoption of sustainable mobility (TASM). Survey data from 466 respondents were analyzed using PLS-SEM. Results reveal that economic cost positively influences perceived convenience (β = 0.632, p < 0.001), suggesting that price can act as a signal of reliability. Awareness slightly enhances convenience (β = 0.079, p = 0.032), whereas sustainability values reduce convenience (β = -0.172, p < 0.001) but strongly and directly foster adoption (β = 0.814, p < 0.001). Perceived convenience predicts adoption (β = 0.091, p = 0.013) and mediates the cost–adoption link (indirect β = 0.058, p = 0.013). Moreover, economic cost moderates the values–adoption relationship (β = 0.094, p < 0.001), weakening value effects when costs are high. The model explains significant variance (R²_PC = 0.411; R²_TASM = 0.646). Theoretically, this research reconceptualizes cost, convenience, and values as context-dependent constructs shaped by open-innovation ecosystems, including bounded rationality, open social innovation, and platform orchestration. Practically, the findings inform strategies for convenience-first design, inclusive pricing, and interoperable platforms to scale sustainable mobility in tourism.

本研究将行为理论与开放创新动力学相结合，探讨游客对可持续流动的接受程度。利用计划行为理论（TPB）、期望价值理论（EVT）、创新扩散理论（DOI）和技术接受模型（TAM），研究了经济成本（ECI）、可持续选择意识（ASO）、个人可持续价值（ISV）和感知便利性（PC）如何影响游客对可持续交通（TASM）的采用。使用PLS-SEM对466名受访者的调查数据进行了分析。结果显示，经济成本正影响感知便利性（β = 0.632, p <； 0.001），表明价格可以作为可靠性的信号。意识略微提高了便利性（β = 0.079, p = 0.032），而可持续价值观降低了便利性（β = -0.172, p <； 0.001），但强烈而直接地促进了收养（β = 0.814, p <； 0.001）。感知便利性预测采用（β = 0.091, p = 0.013），中介成本-采用（间接β = 0.058, p = 0.013）。此外，经济成本调节了价值-采用关系（β = 0.094, p <； 0.001），当成本高时，价值效应减弱。模型解释了显著方差（R²_PC = 0.411; R²_TASM = 0.646）。从理论上讲，本研究将成本、便利和价值重新定义为由开放创新生态系统（包括有限理性、开放社会创新和平台编排）塑造的情境依赖结构。实际上，研究结果为便利优先的设计、包容性定价和可互操作平台的策略提供了信息，以扩大旅游业的可持续流动性。

{"title":"From awareness to action: Understanding the role of economic costs and perceived convenience in tourist mobility decisions","authors":"Taiwo Temitope Lasisi , Marymagdaline Enowmbi Tarkang , M. Omar Parvez , Ahmet Can Şenlik , Kayode Kolawole Eluwole","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100682","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100682","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates tourists’ adoption of sustainable mobility by integrating behavioral theories with open-innovation dynamics. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Expectancy–Value Theory (EVT), Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research examines how economic cost (ECI), awareness of sustainable options (ASO), individual sustainability values (ISV), and perceived convenience (PC) shape the tourist adoption of sustainable mobility (TASM). Survey data from 466 respondents were analyzed using PLS-SEM. Results reveal that economic cost positively influences perceived convenience (β = 0.632, p < 0.001), suggesting that price can act as a signal of reliability. Awareness slightly enhances convenience (β = 0.079, p = 0.032), whereas sustainability values reduce convenience (β = -0.172, p < 0.001) but strongly and directly foster adoption (β = 0.814, p < 0.001). Perceived convenience predicts adoption (β = 0.091, p = 0.013) and mediates the cost–adoption link (indirect β = 0.058, p = 0.013). Moreover, economic cost moderates the values–adoption relationship (β = 0.094, p < 0.001), weakening value effects when costs are high. The model explains significant variance (R²_PC = 0.411; R²_TASM = 0.646). Theoretically, this research reconceptualizes cost, convenience, and values as context-dependent constructs shaped by open-innovation ecosystems, including bounded rationality, open social innovation, and platform orchestration. Practically, the findings inform strategies for convenience-first design, inclusive pricing, and interoperable platforms to scale sustainable mobility in tourism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Innovation dynamics within makerspaces and fabrication laboratories (fablabs): Analysis and key themes from existing literature 创客空间和制造实验室（fablabs）的创新动态：现有文献的分析和关键主题

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100686

Gautam Sharma, Stuti Haldar

Makerspaces and fabrication laboratories (fablabs) have received growing scholarly attention for their potential to advance innovation. These spaces provide individuals access to technological tools while enabling collaboration and community-building around technology-driven activities. Yet, existing research on how innovation unfolds within these settings remains fragmented. This paper reviews and synthesises eighty-nine peer-reviewed studies to provide a clearer understanding of the innovation dynamics in makerspaces. The paper identifies recurring patterns related to collaboration, resources, motivations, diversity, and the social and regional contexts of maker cultures. By integrating these strands, the study highlights both the opportunities and limitations of makerspaces as sites of innovation. The findings contribute to debates on contemporary innovation spaces and offer insights of relevance to policymakers, practitioners, and scholars.

创客空间和制造实验室（fablabs）因其推动创新的潜力而受到越来越多的学术关注。这些空间为个人提供技术工具，同时围绕技术驱动的活动进行协作和社区建设。然而，关于创新如何在这些环境中展开的现有研究仍然是碎片化的。本文回顾并综合了89项同行评议的研究，以更清晰地理解创客空间的创新动态。本文确定了与合作、资源、动机、多样性以及创客文化的社会和区域背景相关的重复模式。通过整合这些方面，该研究强调了创客空间作为创新场所的机遇和局限性。这些发现有助于对当代创新空间的讨论，并为政策制定者、从业者和学者提供相关的见解。

引用次数: 0

Towards a sixfold helix model for green smart cities? A conceptual exploration of stakeholder collaboration, interaction mechanisms, and role allocation 走向绿色智慧城市的六重螺旋模式？利益相关者协作、交互机制和角色分配的概念探索

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100681

Jarosław Brodny, Magdalena Tutak

In an era of increasing urbanization, environmental pressure, and growing demands from residents, modern cities face the challenge of properly managing their development. This article presents a conceptual Sixfold Helix model, which offers a new approach to stakeholder cooperation in the process of building Green Smart Cities. The model is based on the combination of science, industry, public administration, civil society, the natural environment, and the digital technology and infrastructure sector. The addition of the sixth helix results from the dynamic development of digital technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, big data, and blockchain, which significantly strengthens the role of the technological component in city management processes. The particularly dynamic development of artificial intelligence has recently become a dominant component of social and economic life. The multidimensional nature of AI tools and their versatility and flexibility in adapting to different areas of life make it justified to consider this dimension as a separate and strategic pillar of Green Smart Cities development. The paper conceptualizes the Sixfold Helix model and identifies the main types of cooperation mechanisms between stakeholders who play a key role in planning, implementing, and evaluating Green Smart Cities solutions. Reference is also made to the functional links between the individual helices, identifying fifteen key interactions that reflect the directions and mechanisms of cooperation in the urban ecosystem. As part of this conceptual framework, a map of interaction mechanisms and a RACI matrix were developed as tools for the practical integration of activities and coordination of stakeholders in the transformation processes towards Green Smart Cities. In addition, a SWOT analysis was carried out to determine the internal potential of the model. On this basis, recommendations were formulated for coordination mechanisms and support instruments that may increase resilience and adaptability in the implementation of the Sixfold Helix model in urban practice. It can therefore be concluded that the proposed conceptual model creates unique opportunities for technological, social, and environmental integration in city management in a dynamically changing environment.

在城市化、环境压力和居民需求不断增长的时代，现代城市面临着合理管理其发展的挑战。本文提出了一个概念性的六重螺旋模型，为绿色智慧城市建设过程中的利益相关者合作提供了一种新的途径。该模型基于科学、工业、公共管理、公民社会、自然环境以及数字技术和基础设施部门的结合。第六螺旋的增加源于数字技术的动态发展，特别是人工智能、物联网、大数据和区块链，这大大加强了技术成分在城市管理过程中的作用。最近，人工智能的动态发展已经成为社会和经济生活的主要组成部分。人工智能工具的多维性及其适应不同生活领域的多功能性和灵活性，使我们有理由将这一维度视为绿色智慧城市发展的一个独立的战略支柱。本文对六重螺旋模型进行了概念化，并确定了在规划、实施和评估绿色智慧城市解决方案中发挥关键作用的利益相关者之间的主要合作机制类型。本文还提到了各个螺旋之间的功能联系，确定了15个关键的相互作用，这些相互作用反映了城市生态系统合作的方向和机制。作为这一概念框架的一部分，开发了互动机制图和RACI矩阵，作为向绿色智慧城市转型过程中实际整合活动和协调利益相关者的工具。此外，还进行了SWOT分析，以确定模型的内部潜力。在此基础上，对协调机制和支持工具提出了建议，以提高六重螺旋模型在城市实践中实施的弹性和适应性。因此，可以得出结论，所提出的概念模型为在动态变化的环境中整合城市管理中的技术、社会和环境创造了独特的机会。

{"title":"Towards a sixfold helix model for green smart cities? A conceptual exploration of stakeholder collaboration, interaction mechanisms, and role allocation","authors":"Jarosław Brodny, Magdalena Tutak","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100681","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100681","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In an era of increasing urbanization, environmental pressure, and growing demands from residents, modern cities face the challenge of properly managing their development. This article presents a conceptual Sixfold Helix model, which offers a new approach to stakeholder cooperation in the process of building Green Smart Cities. The model is based on the combination of science, industry, public administration, civil society, the natural environment, and the digital technology and infrastructure sector. The addition of the sixth helix results from the dynamic development of digital technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, big data, and blockchain, which significantly strengthens the role of the technological component in city management processes. The particularly dynamic development of artificial intelligence has recently become a dominant component of social and economic life. The multidimensional nature of AI tools and their versatility and flexibility in adapting to different areas of life make it justified to consider this dimension as a separate and strategic pillar of Green Smart Cities development. The paper conceptualizes the Sixfold Helix model and identifies the main types of cooperation mechanisms between stakeholders who play a key role in planning, implementing, and evaluating Green Smart Cities solutions. Reference is also made to the functional links between the individual helices, identifying fifteen key interactions that reflect the directions and mechanisms of cooperation in the urban ecosystem. As part of this conceptual framework, a map of interaction mechanisms and a RACI matrix were developed as tools for the practical integration of activities and coordination of stakeholders in the transformation processes towards Green Smart Cities. In addition, a SWOT analysis was carried out to determine the internal potential of the model. On this basis, recommendations were formulated for coordination mechanisms and support instruments that may increase resilience and adaptability in the implementation of the Sixfold Helix model in urban practice. It can therefore be concluded that the proposed conceptual model creates unique opportunities for technological, social, and environmental integration in city management in a dynamically changing environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Determinants of effective commercialization of scientific projects: Empirical evidence from Kazakhstan 科学项目有效商业化的决定因素：来自哈萨克斯坦的经验证据

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100683

Bauyrzhan M. Yedgenov , Gulnaz Zh. Alibekova , Elmira N. Mynbayeva , Assel K. Kozhakhmetova

This paper investigates the determinants of successful commercialization of scientific projects funded by the government in Kazakhstan from 2016 to 2018. Using the data on 140 projects that include metrics such as sales, number of patents, jobs created as outputs, and factors like grant amount, co-financing, and capital expenditure as inputs, the study provides empirical insights into the key drivers of commercialization success. The research applies OLS and DEA econometric approaches to analyze the relationships between these variables, offering valuable implications for policy-makers, research institutions, and industry stakeholders aiming to enhance the commercialization potential of scientific endeavors. The findings underscore the importance of financial inputs, particularly co-financing from the private sector, capital expenditure, institutional support, and market alignment, in translating research into viable market products.

本文研究了2016年至2018年哈萨克斯坦政府资助的科学项目成功商业化的决定因素。该研究利用140个项目的数据，包括销售额、专利数量、创造的就业机会等指标，以及赠款金额、联合融资和资本支出等因素作为投入，为商业化成功的关键驱动因素提供了实证见解。本研究运用OLS和DEA计量经济学方法分析了这些变量之间的关系，为决策者、研究机构和行业利益相关者提供了有价值的建议，旨在提高科学努力的商业化潜力。研究结果强调了财政投入，特别是来自私营部门的联合融资、资本支出、机构支持和市场协调，在将研究转化为可行的市场产品方面的重要性。

引用次数: 0