首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research最新文献

英文 中文
Pharmacist impact on pneumococcal vaccination rates through incorporation of pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient vaccination intervention 药剂师通过纳入药剂师主导的住院病人机会性疫苗接种干预措施对肺炎球菌疫苗接种率的影响
IF 2.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1891
Tinh Nguyen BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac, Patrick Lam BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac, MClinPharm, MHlthServMt, FSHP
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Pneumococcal disease continues to be a large source of morbidity and mortality despite the availability of effective prevention via immunisation and treatment measures.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Aim</h3> <p>To assess the impact of a pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccination intervention on overall 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPCV) rates in eligible hospitalised subacute patients, aged 70 years and above.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Method</h3> <p>This study was a pre- and post-intervention study conducted across two study sites at Monash Health, a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. Phase 1 (pre-intervention, August–October 2022) involved auditing the vaccine-eligibility of patients on admission and subsequent administration during inpatient stay. Phase 2 (intervention phase, October–December 2022) implemented the pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccine intervention. Following screening, identified vaccine-eligible patients were recommended to the treating physician via verbal discussion and Microsoft Teams for consideration of vaccination administration in hospital. The proportion of eligible patients vaccinated was compared between the pre-intervention and intervention groups. This project was exempt for ethics approval due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Monash Health Human and Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: RES-22-0000-454Q). The justification for this ethics exemption was as follows: the project complies with the National Health and Medical Research Council's <i>Ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities</i>; auditing the percentage of vaccine-eligible and non-vaccinated patients did not require written consent per local requirements; and it is standard practice to obtain verbal consent, followed by documentation on electronic medical records, for inpatient vaccinations. Informed consent was obtained from participants via verbal consent after the distribution of written medical information on the 13vPCV, as well as verbal information provided by the medical team.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>A total of 360 patients were included in the study. Overall, 139 (77.2%) patients in the pre-intervention and 143 (79.4%) patients in the intervention phase were eligible for vaccination (non-vaccinated with age indication). The proportion of patients receiving inpatient 13vPCV was higher in the intervention group compared to the pre-intervention group (43.4 vs 2.2%, p < 0.001).</p> </section> <s
背景 尽管有通过免疫接种和治疗措施进行有效预防的方法,但肺炎球菌疾病仍然是发病率和死亡率的主要来源。 目的 评估以药剂师为主导的住院病人肺炎球菌疫苗接种干预措施对符合条件的 70 岁及以上亚急性住院病人接种 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗 (13vPCV) 的总体比例的影响。 方法 本研究是一项干预前和干预后研究,在澳大利亚维多利亚州的大型医疗服务机构莫纳什卫生院的两个研究点进行。第一阶段(干预前,2022 年 8 月至 10 月)包括审核患者入院时的疫苗接种资格以及住院期间的后续接种情况。第二阶段(干预阶段,2022 年 10 月至 12 月)实施由药剂师主导的住院病人肺炎球菌疫苗机会性干预。筛查后,通过口头讨论和 Microsoft Teams 向主治医生推荐符合疫苗接种条件的患者,供其考虑在住院期间接种疫苗。比较了干预前和干预后两组符合条件的患者接种疫苗的比例。由于莫纳什卫生部人类与研究伦理委员会(Monash Health Human and Research Ethics Committee,简称 "伦理委员会",参考编号:RES-22-0000-454Q)对构成研究的当地政策要求,本项目免于伦理审批。获得伦理豁免的理由如下:该项目符合国家健康与医学研究委员会的《质量保证与评估活动中的伦理考虑因素》;根据当地要求,审核符合接种条件和未接种疫苗的患者比例不需要书面同意;住院病人接种疫苗的标准做法是先获得口头同意,然后在电子病历上进行记录。在分发有关 13vPCV 的书面医疗信息以及医疗团队提供的口头信息后,通过口头同意获得参与者的知情同意。 结果 共有 360 名患者参与了研究。总体而言,干预前和干预阶段分别有 139 名(77.2%)和 143 名(79.4%)患者符合接种条件(未接种但有年龄指征)。与干预前相比,干预组接受住院 13vPCV 的患者比例更高(43.4% vs 2.2%,p < 0.001)。 结论 结果表明,由药剂师主导的住院病人肺炎球菌疫苗接种机会性干预措施能显著提高医院的肺炎球菌疫苗接种率。
{"title":"Pharmacist impact on pneumococcal vaccination rates through incorporation of pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient vaccination intervention","authors":"Tinh Nguyen BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac,&nbsp;Patrick Lam BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac, MClinPharm, MHlthServMt, FSHP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1891","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Pneumococcal disease continues to be a large source of morbidity and mortality despite the availability of effective prevention via immunisation and treatment measures.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Aim&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To assess the impact of a pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccination intervention on overall 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPCV) rates in eligible hospitalised subacute patients, aged 70 years and above.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Method&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study was a pre- and post-intervention study conducted across two study sites at Monash Health, a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. Phase 1 (pre-intervention, August–October 2022) involved auditing the vaccine-eligibility of patients on admission and subsequent administration during inpatient stay. Phase 2 (intervention phase, October–December 2022) implemented the pharmacist-led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccine intervention. Following screening, identified vaccine-eligible patients were recommended to the treating physician via verbal discussion and Microsoft Teams for consideration of vaccination administration in hospital. The proportion of eligible patients vaccinated was compared between the pre-intervention and intervention groups. This project was exempt for ethics approval due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Monash Health Human and Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: RES-22-0000-454Q). The justification for this ethics exemption was as follows: the project complies with the National Health and Medical Research Council's &lt;i&gt;Ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities&lt;/i&gt;; auditing the percentage of vaccine-eligible and non-vaccinated patients did not require written consent per local requirements; and it is standard practice to obtain verbal consent, followed by documentation on electronic medical records, for inpatient vaccinations. Informed consent was obtained from participants via verbal consent after the distribution of written medical information on the 13vPCV, as well as verbal information provided by the medical team.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A total of 360 patients were included in the study. Overall, 139 (77.2%) patients in the pre-intervention and 143 (79.4%) patients in the intervention phase were eligible for vaccination (non-vaccinated with age indication). The proportion of patients receiving inpatient 13vPCV was higher in the intervention group compared to the pre-intervention group (43.4 vs 2.2%, p &lt; 0.001).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;s","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 1","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139942920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The medical emergency team pharmacist: describing an overnight service 医疗急救队药剂师:描述通宵服务
IF 2.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1888
Lauren Crawley BPharm(Hons), GradCertPharmPrac, Gail Edwards BPharm, MClinPharm, Harry Gibbs MBBS FRACP FCSANZ, Erica Tong BPharm(Hons), MClinPharm, PhD

Background

Clinical practice after hours and attendance at medical emergency team (MET) calls are two novel and emerging areas of pharmacy practice. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution's pharmacy services expanded from 8 am–5 pm to 24 h daily, including MET call attendance.

Aim

This study aimed to describe pharmacist roles, including medications charted by the general medicine and intensive care unit pharmacists during the period of extended-hours pharmacy practice and the characteristics of MET calls attended.

Method

This descriptive, cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia between 3 April 2020–28 February 2021, when a MET was called between 5 pm–8 am, a pharmacist attended, and medication changes occurred. Data collected included whether the MET call was medication related and a description of medication changes. Ethics approval was granted by the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 297/21).

Results

One thousand six hundred and forty-four MET calls (average 5.4 calls per night) were attended by pharmacists during extended hours. Medication changes were made in response to clinical deterioration at 627 (38%) calls. The most frequent change was the initiation of cardiovascular medications (n = 206). Partnered pharmacist medication charting, including commencing, ceasing, or changing medications, occurred at 39% of MET calls with therapy changes.

Conclusion

Pharmacists can play a key role in managing deteriorating patients as part of a MET team. Medications may be implicated in clinical deterioration of patients and are frequently administered at MET calls. The expansion of pharmacy services provided the opportunity for pharmacists to contribute to MET calls across the 24-h period.

下班后的临床实践和参加医疗急救小组(MET)呼叫是药学实践的两个新兴领域。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我院的药学服务从上午 8 点至下午 5 点扩展到每天 24 小时,包括参加医疗急救小组的呼叫。本研究旨在描述药剂师的角色,包括普通内科和重症监护室药剂师在延时药学实践期间的用药记录,以及参加医疗急救小组呼叫的特点。这项描述性横断面研究包括澳大利亚维多利亚州阿尔弗雷德医院在 2020 年 4 月 3 日至 2021 年 2 月 28 日期间收治的患者,这些患者在下午 5 点至上午 8 点之间接到医疗急救小组的呼叫,药剂师参加了呼叫,并发生了用药变化。收集的数据包括 MET 呼叫是否与用药有关以及用药变化的描述。药剂师在延长时间内接听了 1644 次 MET 电话(平均每晚 5.4 次)。在 627 次(38%)呼叫中,药剂师根据临床病情的恶化情况对药物进行了调整。最常见的用药变化是开始使用心血管药物(n = 206)。在 39% 的 MET 呼叫中,药剂师合作进行了用药记录,包括开始用药、停止用药或更换药物。药剂师作为 MET 团队的一员,可在管理病情恶化的患者方面发挥关键作用。药物可能与患者的临床病情恶化有关,因此在 MET 呼叫中经常会使用药物。药房服务的扩展为药剂师在 24 小时内参与 MET 呼叫提供了机会。
{"title":"The medical emergency team pharmacist: describing an overnight service","authors":"Lauren Crawley BPharm(Hons), GradCertPharmPrac,&nbsp;Gail Edwards BPharm, MClinPharm,&nbsp;Harry Gibbs MBBS FRACP FCSANZ,&nbsp;Erica Tong BPharm(Hons), MClinPharm, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1888","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1888","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinical practice after hours and attendance at medical emergency team (MET) calls are two novel and emerging areas of pharmacy practice. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution's pharmacy services expanded from 8 am–5 pm to 24 h daily, including MET call attendance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to describe pharmacist roles, including medications charted by the general medicine and intensive care unit pharmacists during the period of extended-hours pharmacy practice and the characteristics of MET calls attended.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This descriptive, cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia between 3 April 2020–28 February 2021, when a MET was called between 5 pm–8 am, a pharmacist attended, and medication changes occurred. Data collected included whether the MET call was medication related and a description of medication changes. Ethics approval was granted by the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 297/21).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One thousand six hundred and forty-four MET calls (average 5.4 calls per night) were attended by pharmacists during extended hours. Medication changes were made in response to clinical deterioration at 627 (38%) calls. The most frequent change was the initiation of cardiovascular medications (<i>n</i> = 206). Partnered pharmacist medication charting, including commencing, ceasing, or changing medications, occurred at 39% of MET calls with therapy changes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pharmacists can play a key role in managing deteriorating patients as part of a MET team. Medications may be implicated in clinical deterioration of patients and are frequently administered at MET calls. The expansion of pharmacy services provided the opportunity for pharmacists to contribute to MET calls across the 24-h period.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 2","pages":"145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140470794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deprescribing: a 20-year retrospective 去处方化:20 年回顾
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1906
Ian A. Scott MBBS, FRACP, MHA, MEd
<p>It has been 20 years since Michael Woodward wrote, as part of the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, the first article on deprescribing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Since then, the term ‘deprescribing’ has become part of the medical lexicon, and by October 2023 more than 1000 articles had appeared in PubMed with ‘deprescribing’ in the title. While several definitions of deprescribing have appeared, at its heart it represents a process, supervised by a health professional and using a shared decision-making approach, for identifying and withdrawing (or dose reducing) medications which are not indicated or are ineffective or where potential harm outweighs potential benefit, with the aim of improving patient health.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Numerous studies have documented the burden and ill-effects of inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy, particularly among older, frail and multimorbid patients. The expectation that clinicians should adhere to various single-disease guidelines, derived from clinical trials involving mostly younger people, has led to an increase in exposure to polypharmacy. Older people, especially those who are frail, tend to experience lower efficacy of chronic medications and higher risk of adverse effects.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Among people taking multiple medicines, many feel burdened by their treatment.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>In response to these observations, a plethora of deprescribing tools, protocols, guidelines and checklists have appeared to assist clinicians and patients in countering polypharmacy, treatment burden and medication-related harm.<span><sup>2, 5, 6</sup></span> These aids can be broadly categorised as implicit or holistic approaches which consider all medications a patient is taking or more specific aids targeting high-risk medications, such as benzodiazepines, anticoagulants and oral hypoglycaemics.</p><p>In addition, ‘deprescribing networks’ have been established in various countries which comprise geriatricians, general physicians, primary care clinicians, clinical pharmacologists, pharmacists and other discipline representatives committed to researching and implementing ways of reducing inappropriate medication. The first deprescribing network was established in Australia in 2014.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Subsequently, similar networks were established in the United States,<span><sup>8</sup></span> Canada,<span><sup>9</sup></span> England<span><sup>10</sup></span> and Northern Europe.<span><sup>11</sup></span> These networks have been instrumental in producing and disseminating drug-specific, evidence-based deprescribing guidelines for clinicians, providing consumer-facing resources and support, developing national action plans for improving quality use of medications, promoting deprescribing research and convening national and international deprescribing conferences to share knowledge and forge collaborations.</p><p>Evidence has shown that deprescribing interventions can be feasibly
20年前,迈克尔·伍德沃德(Michael Woodward)在《老年治疗学》(Geriatric Therapeutics)系列中撰写了第一篇关于处方解除的文章从那时起,“deprescribing”一词就成为了医学词典的一部分,到2023年10月,PubMed上出现了1000多篇标题中带有“deprescribing”的文章。虽然已经出现了几种关于处方解除的定义,但其核心是在卫生专业人员的监督下,采用共同的决策方法,确定和撤销(或减少剂量)无指涉或无效或潜在危害大于潜在益处的药物,目的是改善患者健康。许多研究已经证明了不适当的处方和多种用药的负担和不良影响,特别是在老年、体弱和多种疾病的患者中。临床医生应该遵守各种单一疾病指南的期望,来自主要涉及年轻人的临床试验,导致了对多种药物的暴露增加。老年人,尤其是体弱多病的老年人,慢性药物的疗效往往较低,不良反应的风险较高在服用多种药物的人群中,许多人对自己的治疗感到负担。作为对这些观察结果的回应,大量的处方工具、协议、指南和清单已经出现,以帮助临床医生和患者应对多药、治疗负担和药物相关伤害。2,5,6这些辅助措施大致可分为考虑患者正在服用的所有药物的隐性或整体方法,或针对高危药物(如苯二氮卓类药物、抗凝血剂和口服降糖药)的更具体的辅助措施。此外,各国还建立了“处方减少网络”,由老年病医生、全科医生、初级保健临床医生、临床药理学家、药剂师和其他学科代表组成,致力于研究和实施减少不当用药的方法。第一个处方解除网络于2014年在澳大利亚建立。随后,在美国、加拿大、英国和北欧也建立了类似的网络。这些网络在为临床医生制定和传播针对特定药物的循证处方解除指南、提供面向消费者的资源和支持、制定提高药物使用质量的国家行动计划方面发挥了重要作用。促进处方解除研究,召开国家和国际处方解除会议,以分享知识和建立合作。有证据表明,在各种临床环境中可以可行地进行处方化干预,并且可以安全地减少可能不适当的药物的数量。处方是否可以预防药物不良事件(ADEs)、死亡率或住院治疗,或改善精神和身体功能和生活质量(QOL),这一点很难证明有迹象表明,以病人为中心的直接干预措施可能降低死亡率,而一些试验(但不是全部)表明,对住院率和生活质量产生了有利影响。13最近的试验侧重于使用计算机生成的药物咨询或决策支持,其中一些与电子医疗记录有关,以鼓励在日常实践中更一致地应用开处方。虽然再次发现可能不适当的药物减少,但对其他结果(包括不良事件、死亡、住院表现、跌倒和生活质量)的显著影响尚未出现为什么呢?有几个可能的原因:有害药物数量的绝对减少通常非常小(每位患者0.5种药物);开处方者接受开处方建议的比例通常不超过50%;开处方干预措施(审查药物清单,确定可开处方的候选药物,制定和执行与患者商定的开处方方案)往往仅限于一两次专门的咨询;解除某些药物处方的效果因人而异,因此在汇总数据中可能会丢失有益的信号;如果没有长期(12个月)随访,死亡和不良反应等硬终点并不常见;功能或生活质量的测量可能太不敏感,无法检测患者的重要利益。此外,为了成功地开处方,它必须涉及多个处方者和药剂师对个体患者的整个链之间的沟通和积极参与;此外,疾病轨迹的变化需要及时修订处方方案。 在一个时间紧迫的世界里,临床医生在分散的医疗保健系统中工作,这也许并不奇怪,现实世界的临床试验,与上述限制相抗衡,未能证明临床结果的持续改善。缺乏证据是否会使描述努力成为浪费时间?当然不是。患者仍然受益于减轻药物负担,减少自付费用,并且更有可能在较少药物的情况下坚持那些对改善健康至关重要的药物。医疗保健系统还受益于停止使用不必要的药物所节省的费用,这些费用可以重新定向到更好的用途。随着时间的推移,通过设计更好的试验(包括被严重低估的n-of-1试验),人们将认识到处方化的全部潜力;更精确地识别药物危害风险最大的患者亚组,并可能从处方中受益(包括通过人工智能手段);更细致的全人处方指南,包括非药物替代品;为开处方者和药剂师进行定期开处方审查提供保护和安排的时间和挂钩报酬;完全连接的电子医疗记录,用于在多个临床医生之间传递与药物相关的信息;以及更多质疑药物必要性的病人。当第一次开处方时,确定停药的时机和情况也会有所帮助,因为直到问题出现时才考虑开处方。为越来越多的认知障碍和痴呆患者开发处方资源是另一个紧迫的挑战。在过去的20年里,开处方已经被认可和接受为一种合法和重要的临床实践,以提高药物安全性和患者健康。多种药物和药物伤害的规模已经明确,合理地使用处方已被证明是安全的。仅凭这些观察结果,就可以证明它在临床实践中的系统应用,并且随着时间的推移,人们可以合理地预测其健康益处将变得更加明显。作者声明他没有利益冲突。本文未收到任何资助。
{"title":"Deprescribing: a 20-year retrospective","authors":"Ian A. Scott MBBS, FRACP, MHA, MEd","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1906","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1906","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;It has been 20 years since Michael Woodward wrote, as part of the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, the first article on deprescribing.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Since then, the term ‘deprescribing’ has become part of the medical lexicon, and by October 2023 more than 1000 articles had appeared in PubMed with ‘deprescribing’ in the title. While several definitions of deprescribing have appeared, at its heart it represents a process, supervised by a health professional and using a shared decision-making approach, for identifying and withdrawing (or dose reducing) medications which are not indicated or are ineffective or where potential harm outweighs potential benefit, with the aim of improving patient health.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Numerous studies have documented the burden and ill-effects of inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy, particularly among older, frail and multimorbid patients. The expectation that clinicians should adhere to various single-disease guidelines, derived from clinical trials involving mostly younger people, has led to an increase in exposure to polypharmacy. Older people, especially those who are frail, tend to experience lower efficacy of chronic medications and higher risk of adverse effects.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Among people taking multiple medicines, many feel burdened by their treatment.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In response to these observations, a plethora of deprescribing tools, protocols, guidelines and checklists have appeared to assist clinicians and patients in countering polypharmacy, treatment burden and medication-related harm.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 5, 6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; These aids can be broadly categorised as implicit or holistic approaches which consider all medications a patient is taking or more specific aids targeting high-risk medications, such as benzodiazepines, anticoagulants and oral hypoglycaemics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, ‘deprescribing networks’ have been established in various countries which comprise geriatricians, general physicians, primary care clinicians, clinical pharmacologists, pharmacists and other discipline representatives committed to researching and implementing ways of reducing inappropriate medication. The first deprescribing network was established in Australia in 2014.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Subsequently, similar networks were established in the United States,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Canada,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; England&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and Northern Europe.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; These networks have been instrumental in producing and disseminating drug-specific, evidence-based deprescribing guidelines for clinicians, providing consumer-facing resources and support, developing national action plans for improving quality use of medications, promoting deprescribing research and convening national and international deprescribing conferences to share knowledge and forge collaborations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evidence has shown that deprescribing interventions can be feasibly","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1906","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139604383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease: what has changed in 30 years? 阿尔茨海默病的药物治疗:30 年来发生了哪些变化?
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1905
Michael C. Woodward AM, MBBS, MD, FRACP
<p>The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series in this journal can look proudly on what has been achieved over the last 30-plus years — pharmacists, doctors and other health professionals are now more aware of the issues impacting on prescribing and administering medications to older people. In some respects, it is ‘job done’ for the series — the end of a long journey. The mission of developing effective and safe therapies for Alzheimer's disease sadly cannot yet make the same claim, but we can say we are at the end of the beginning, with disease-modifying drugs, such as the monoclonal antibody lecanemab, now approved in some countries and under consideration by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia. These drugs target the underlying disease process — accumulation of amyloid — and have been demonstrated to impact favourably on the progression of symptoms.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> This is a significant milestone in a very long mission.</p><p>It is grounding to re-read the article reprinted below, written in 1994 by Hopwood and Morris,<span><sup>3</sup></span> two leading clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease at that time, based at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital. In describing the limited treatment options for Alzheimer's disease in 1994, their vision, and even desperation, are apparent. But also clear is what has plagued this mission for so many decades — lots of possible therapeutic targets that ultimately came to nothing. For a quarter of a century, since the cholinergic therapies and memantine, we had nothing new that was effective in treating the progressive cognitive and functional impairments caused by Alzheimer's. The brain is a hard nut to crack, as those on similar missions with other neurodegenerative diseases (think Parkinson's and motor neuron disease) have found.</p><p>Hopwood and Morris<span><sup>3</sup></span> concentrated on the restoration of chemical neurotransmission to boost the ‘function of surviving neurons’. That was reasonable — it was a ‘low hanging fruit’, with a well-demonstrated reduction in the activity of choline acetyltransferase (the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of acetylcholine) in people with Alzheimer's disease and early promising results with the short-acting cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine. The first clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics, with tacrine (a longer-acting cholinesterase inhibitor), began in Australia following the publication of a 1986 study by Summers et al.<span><sup>4</sup></span> that was cited in the Hopwood and Morris article,<span><sup>3</sup></span> but concentrating on these chemicals was never likely to have the more fundamental effect needed — disease modification.</p><p>In their article, Hopwood and Morris<span><sup>3</sup></span> stated that ‘effective preventative strategies aimed at preventing neuronal degeneration remain speculative’, but they did flag this as a future direction (‘[e]ventually strategies may b
该杂志的老年治疗评论系列可以自豪地回顾过去30多年来取得的成就——药剂师、医生和其他卫生专业人员现在更加意识到影响老年人处方和管理药物的问题。在某些方面,这是“任务完成”的系列-结束了漫长的旅程。遗憾的是,开发有效和安全的阿尔茨海默病治疗方法的使命还不能做出同样的声明,但我们可以说,我们正处于起点的终点,例如单克隆抗体lecanemab,目前已在一些国家获得批准,澳大利亚的治疗用品管理局(Therapeutic Goods Administration)正在考虑使用这种药物。这些药物针对潜在的疾病过程——淀粉样蛋白的积累——并已被证明对症状的进展有积极的影响。这是一项漫长任务中的一个重要里程碑。重新阅读下面转载的一篇文章是有根据的,这篇文章是由当时在海德堡遣返医院诊断和治疗阿尔茨海默病的两位主要临床医生Hopwood和Morris于1994年写的。在1994年描述阿尔茨海默病有限的治疗选择时,他们的远见,甚至绝望,是显而易见的。但同样清楚的是,几十年来一直困扰着这项任务的是——许多可能的治疗目标最终都无果而终。四分之一个世纪以来,自从胆碱能疗法和美金刚问世以来,我们没有任何新的方法能有效地治疗由阿尔茨海默氏症引起的进行性认知和功能障碍。大脑是一块难啃的硬骨头,正如那些在其他神经退行性疾病(比如帕金森氏症和运动神经元疾病)上进行类似任务的人所发现的那样。霍普伍德和莫里斯专注于恢复化学神经传递,以增强“存活神经元的功能”。是合理的——这是一个“低垂的果实”,与充分展现出减少胆碱乙酰转移酶的活性(乙酰胆碱的合成的酶)在早期阿尔茨海默氏症和有前景的结果与短效胆碱酯酶抑制剂毒扁豆碱。阿兹海默症治疗的第一个临床试验,用他克林(一种长效胆碱酯酶抑制剂),开始于1986年由Summers等人发表的一项研究,该研究在Hopwood和Morris的文章中被引用,但集中在这些化学物质上从来没有可能产生更根本的效果——疾病的改变。在他们的文章中,Hopwood和Morris3指出,“旨在防止神经元退化的有效预防策略仍然是推测性的”,但他们确实标志着这是未来的方向(“最终的策略可能基于改变淀粉样蛋白产生的生化途径”)。18年后的2012年,当我为《老年治疗学》(Geriatric Therapeutics)系列回顾这一领域时,各种可能改善疾病的治疗方法已经被开发出来并进行了试验早期人们对减少淀粉样蛋白产生的药物和早期针对淀粉样蛋白的单克隆抗体的兴奋之情,很快就被现实冲淡了——它们并不有效。但是战场并没有退却。尽管失败率高达99%,但仍有大量资源投入到这种最终致命的疾病上。澳大利亚的痴呆症研究机构,如海德堡遣返医院,几乎从一开始就参与了这一旅程。30年来,我们在澳大利亚各地进行了200多项临床试验,试验了150多种单独的研究产品,现在我们已经进入了阿尔茨海默病改善治疗的第一阶段,但我们还有很长的路要走。下一阶段成功的关键可能是二级预防——在显著的神经变性和症状发生之前靶向淀粉样蛋白和其他疾病机制,使用联合或顺序治疗,并根据个体遗传和药物基因组谱定制治疗。与癌症疗法的类比很有吸引力,但我们不能再次陷入过度简化大脑或试图复制对其他疾病有效的方法的陷阱。我们绝不能忽视在一生中采取非药物预防措施的必要性,包括饮食、锻炼、体育和社会活动霍普伍德和莫里斯也很有先见之明,他们指出,控制阿尔茨海默病(总是)会有比药物更多的方法(“地毯治疗必须始终被视为管理计划的一部分”)。 因此,就像30多年的老年治疗学之旅让我们更加明智,并为老年人提供了高质量使用药物的工具箱一样,有效治疗阿尔茨海默病的更长期使命也处于一个里程碑,但我们还没有达到目标!作者曾获得罗氏、默克、杨森、礼来、卫材、百健、Actinogen、Anavex、免疫生物、诺和诺德、葛兰素史克和辉瑞等制药公司的专家咨询和演讲费酬金。奥斯丁健康公司获得了制药行业对阿尔茨海默病研究的资助,部分用于支付工资。作者没有任何制药或生物技术公司的股份或直接就业。本文未收到任何资助。
{"title":"Drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease: what has changed in 30 years?","authors":"Michael C. Woodward AM, MBBS, MD, FRACP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1905","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1905","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series in this journal can look proudly on what has been achieved over the last 30-plus years — pharmacists, doctors and other health professionals are now more aware of the issues impacting on prescribing and administering medications to older people. In some respects, it is ‘job done’ for the series — the end of a long journey. The mission of developing effective and safe therapies for Alzheimer's disease sadly cannot yet make the same claim, but we can say we are at the end of the beginning, with disease-modifying drugs, such as the monoclonal antibody lecanemab, now approved in some countries and under consideration by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia. These drugs target the underlying disease process — accumulation of amyloid — and have been demonstrated to impact favourably on the progression of symptoms.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This is a significant milestone in a very long mission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is grounding to re-read the article reprinted below, written in 1994 by Hopwood and Morris,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; two leading clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease at that time, based at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital. In describing the limited treatment options for Alzheimer's disease in 1994, their vision, and even desperation, are apparent. But also clear is what has plagued this mission for so many decades — lots of possible therapeutic targets that ultimately came to nothing. For a quarter of a century, since the cholinergic therapies and memantine, we had nothing new that was effective in treating the progressive cognitive and functional impairments caused by Alzheimer's. The brain is a hard nut to crack, as those on similar missions with other neurodegenerative diseases (think Parkinson's and motor neuron disease) have found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopwood and Morris&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; concentrated on the restoration of chemical neurotransmission to boost the ‘function of surviving neurons’. That was reasonable — it was a ‘low hanging fruit’, with a well-demonstrated reduction in the activity of choline acetyltransferase (the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of acetylcholine) in people with Alzheimer's disease and early promising results with the short-acting cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine. The first clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics, with tacrine (a longer-acting cholinesterase inhibitor), began in Australia following the publication of a 1986 study by Summers et al.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; that was cited in the Hopwood and Morris article,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; but concentrating on these chemicals was never likely to have the more fundamental effect needed — disease modification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In their article, Hopwood and Morris&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; stated that ‘effective preventative strategies aimed at preventing neuronal degeneration remain speculative’, but they did flag this as a future direction (‘[e]ventually strategies may b","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"314-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1905","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139605049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developments in diabetes management for older people 1991–2023 1991-2023 年老年人糖尿病管理的发展情况
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1908
Tilenka R. J. Thynne MBBS, FRACP
<p>The landscape of type 2 diabetes management has changed dramatically in the 32 years since Mario De Luise's 1991 Geriatric Therapeutics paper on ‘Treatment of diabetes mellitus in the elderly’.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As De Luise predicted, the combined effect of an ageing population and real increases in the age-specific incidence of diabetes has led to a significant impact on the healthcare system. The number of people living with diabetes in Australia increased more than 2-fold between 2001 and 2022, and almost one in five (18.7%) people aged over 75 years now has diabetes.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Our understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetes and its complications has been enhanced by landmark trials such as the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), published in 1998, which challenged the thinking of the time that there was little evidence that tight glycaemic control could reduce the progression of established microvascular complications (kidney disease, retinopathy and neuropathy).<span><sup>3</sup></span> With tight glycaemic control, however, can come harm. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, published in 2008, found that intensive therapy with drugs that cause hypoglycaemia can increase mortality in patients with, or at high risk of, cardiovascular disease.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Hypoglycaemia in older people may also increase the risk of falls and has been associated with reduced quality of life.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>The therapeutic options for treating type 2 diabetes have expanded dramatically in the last 30 years, particularly in the second half of that period. In 1991 the available drugs were limited to sulfonylureas, metformin and insulin.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Dexfenfluramine, a serotoninergic anorectic drug, introduced in De Luise's paper as having a potential evolving role in the management of type 2 diabetes,<span><sup>1</sup></span> was later that decade withdrawn, along with fenfluramine, due to an increased risk of valvular heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. The tale of diabetes drug advances has a central theme of pharmacovigilance. In 2008 the US Food and Drug Administration issued a Guidance for Industry requiring all new type 2 diabetes drug development programs to rule out unacceptable cardiovascular risk. In part this was motivated by concern about the potential signal of an increased cardiovascular risk with the thiazolidinedione drug, rosiglitazone.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Rather than dampening enthusiasm for diabetes drug development, what followed has been the approval of multiple new drugs for type 2 diabetes, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors (‘gliptins’), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (‘gliflozins’) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (incretin mimetics), each with cardiovascular outcome trial data that was required to include older adults at higher risk of cardiovascular events. The
自1991年Mario De Luise发表《老年治疗学》论文《老年人糖尿病的治疗》以来,32年来,2型糖尿病治疗的前景发生了巨大变化正如De Luise所预测的那样,人口老龄化和年龄特异性糖尿病发病率的实际增加的综合影响已经对医疗保健系统产生了重大影响。从2001年到2022年,澳大利亚的糖尿病患者人数增加了两倍多,75岁以上的人中几乎有五分之一(18.7%)患有糖尿病。我们对糖尿病及其并发症的病理生理学的理解已经通过里程碑式的试验得到了加强,例如1998年发表的英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS),该研究挑战了当时的想法,即几乎没有证据表明严格的血糖控制可以减少已建立的微血管并发症(肾脏疾病、视网膜病变和神经病变)的进展然而,严格控制血糖会带来危害。2008年发表的控制糖尿病心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验发现,使用导致低血糖的药物进行强化治疗可增加心血管疾病患者或高危心血管疾病患者的死亡率老年人低血糖也可能增加跌倒的风险,并与生活质量下降有关。在过去的30年里,治疗2型糖尿病的治疗选择急剧扩大,特别是在这一时期的下半年。1991年,可用的药物仅限于磺脲类、二甲双胍和胰岛素右旋氟拉明(Dexfenfluramine)是一种血清素能的厌食药,在De Luise的论文中被介绍为在2型糖尿病的治疗中具有潜在的发展作用,但在10年后,由于瓣膜性心脏病和肺动脉高压的风险增加,它与芬氟拉明一起被撤回。糖尿病药物进展的故事有一个药物警戒的中心主题。2008年,美国食品和药物管理局发布了一份行业指南,要求所有新的2型糖尿病药物开发项目排除不可接受的心血管风险。在某种程度上,这是出于对噻唑烷二酮类药物罗格列酮增加心血管风险的潜在信号的担忧随后,多种2型糖尿病新药获批,包括二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP4)抑制剂(格列净)、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂(格列净)和胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)受体激动剂(促肠促胰岛素模拟剂),而不是抑制糖尿病药物开发的热情,每种药物都有心血管结局试验数据,需要包括心血管事件高风险的老年人。具有里程碑意义的2015年EMPA-REG试验(恩帕列净与安慰剂加标准治疗,平均患者年龄63.1±8.6岁)是首个证明心血管死亡、心力衰竭住院和任何原因死亡风险降低的糖尿病药物试验我们现在有多种糖尿病药物,它们对心血管、肾脏和心力衰竭都有益处,这些益处与它们的降血糖特性无关,而且它们的适应症正在扩展到糖尿病之外,包括心力衰竭、肾脏疾病和肥胖的治疗。与磺脲类药物和胰岛素相比,这些新药还具有降低低血糖风险的优势。在1991年De Luise撰写文章时,除了二甲双胍,这两种药物是仅有的药物选择。尽管对糖尿病的认识有所进步,有效的治疗选择也有所增加,但在老年糖尿病患者的管理方面仍存在许多挑战。老年糖尿病常伴有多病。多重用药几乎是不可避免的,这增加了药物相互作用、不良反应和不依从性的风险。自De Luise的论文发表以来,有些事情根本没有改变:对老年糖尿病患者进行个性化管理和治疗目标的关键治疗信息在2023年与1991年一样重要。作者声明他没有利益冲突。本评论没有得到任何公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构的特别资助。
{"title":"Developments in diabetes management for older people 1991–2023","authors":"Tilenka R. J. Thynne MBBS, FRACP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1908","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1908","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The landscape of type 2 diabetes management has changed dramatically in the 32 years since Mario De Luise's 1991 Geriatric Therapeutics paper on ‘Treatment of diabetes mellitus in the elderly’.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; As De Luise predicted, the combined effect of an ageing population and real increases in the age-specific incidence of diabetes has led to a significant impact on the healthcare system. The number of people living with diabetes in Australia increased more than 2-fold between 2001 and 2022, and almost one in five (18.7%) people aged over 75 years now has diabetes.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetes and its complications has been enhanced by landmark trials such as the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), published in 1998, which challenged the thinking of the time that there was little evidence that tight glycaemic control could reduce the progression of established microvascular complications (kidney disease, retinopathy and neuropathy).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; With tight glycaemic control, however, can come harm. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, published in 2008, found that intensive therapy with drugs that cause hypoglycaemia can increase mortality in patients with, or at high risk of, cardiovascular disease.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hypoglycaemia in older people may also increase the risk of falls and has been associated with reduced quality of life.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The therapeutic options for treating type 2 diabetes have expanded dramatically in the last 30 years, particularly in the second half of that period. In 1991 the available drugs were limited to sulfonylureas, metformin and insulin.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Dexfenfluramine, a serotoninergic anorectic drug, introduced in De Luise's paper as having a potential evolving role in the management of type 2 diabetes,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; was later that decade withdrawn, along with fenfluramine, due to an increased risk of valvular heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. The tale of diabetes drug advances has a central theme of pharmacovigilance. In 2008 the US Food and Drug Administration issued a Guidance for Industry requiring all new type 2 diabetes drug development programs to rule out unacceptable cardiovascular risk. In part this was motivated by concern about the potential signal of an increased cardiovascular risk with the thiazolidinedione drug, rosiglitazone.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Rather than dampening enthusiasm for diabetes drug development, what followed has been the approval of multiple new drugs for type 2 diabetes, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors (‘gliptins’), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (‘gliflozins’) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (incretin mimetics), each with cardiovascular outcome trial data that was required to include older adults at higher risk of cardiovascular events. The ","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1908","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139603091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A trip down memory lane: 37 years of Geriatric Therapeutics 记忆之旅:老年病治疗学 37 年历程
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1907
Robyn J. Saunders BPharm, Grad Dip Hosp Pharm, AACPA

It is with great pleasure and pride that I introduce this reprint of Rohan Elliott and Michael Woodward's article, ‘Thirty years of Geriatric Therapeutics’, originally published in 2016.1 As a founding member of the Geriatric Therapeutics Editorial Committee in 1986, reading this article feels like a nostalgic stroll down memory lane, to a time where knowledge of the impact of ageing on medication safety was limited, and we were innocently oblivious to the impending explosion of information and therapeutic advances that lay ahead.

Driven by altruistic ambition, in 1986 the pharmacy department at Melbourne's Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital (‘the Repat’) embarked on an educational mission to improve prescribing for our ageing war veteran population. Our aim was to raise prescribers' awareness of the fact that older individuals handle medications differently, and respond differently, compared to their younger counterparts. To achieve this aim, we approached consultant physicians at the Repat, requesting them to write an article within their specialty, with a focus on treating older people. By doing so, we aimed to deepen their understanding of the complexities associated with elderly patients. We hoped that this subtle approach would enhance the consultant's knowledge, while also educating a broader clinical readership.

Fortunately, the newly appointed director of geriatrics at the Repat, Dr David Fonda, enthusiastically agreed to join our small editorial team. It was his task to approach the consultants and encourage their contributions to the newsletter. We had no reservations about leveraging our greatest asset: it was indeed challenging for authors to decline David's requests. Each Geriatric Therapeutics article was published in the pharmacy's monthly newsletter, which was distributed across all clinical areas within the hospital.

The enduring interest in our articles persisted over the ensuing years and was further bolstered by the addition of geriatrician Dr Michael Woodward to the editorial team. The column's professionalism received a significant boost when this Journal agreed to publish our articles from 1991, leading to an expanded distribution. With Michael at the helm of the editorial committee, and articles published in the Journal, authors were able to be recruited beyond the initial primary targets at the Repat hospital, and over the years leading physicians from throughout Australia contributed articles. As clinical pharmacy practice developed and matured, pharmacists with expertise in the care of older people were also invited to contribute articles.

The Geriatric Therapeutics series (more recently known as Geriatric Therapeutics Review) also owes much to the dedication and unparalleled commitment of Rohan Elliott, who joined the editorial committee in 1999 and became the editor in 2014. Without his input, Geriatric Therapeutics Review would not have achieved a remark

我非常高兴和自豪地介绍Rohan Elliott和Michael Woodward的文章的转载,“老年治疗学的三十年”,最初发表于2016年。作为1986年老年治疗学编辑委员会的创始成员,阅读这篇文章感觉就像在回忆的小路上漫步,回到一个关于衰老对药物安全影响的知识有限的时代。我们天真地忽视了即将到来的信息爆炸和治疗进步。在无私的野心驱使下,1986年,墨尔本海德堡遣返医院(the Repat)的药剂科开始了一项教育任务,以改善我们老龄化的退伍军人的处方。我们的目的是提高开处方者的意识,与年轻人相比,老年人处理药物的方式不同,反应也不同。为了实现这一目标,我们找到了Repat的顾问医生,请他们写一篇关于治疗老年人的专业文章。通过这样做,我们旨在加深他们对老年患者相关复杂性的理解。我们希望这种微妙的方法可以提高咨询师的知识,同时也教育更广泛的临床读者。幸运的是,Repat新任命的老年病学主任David Fonda博士热情地同意加入我们的小编辑团队。他的任务是接近顾问并鼓励他们为通讯撰稿。我们对利用我们最大的资产毫无保留:拒绝大卫的请求对作者来说确实是一个挑战。每篇老年治疗学的文章都发表在药房的每月通讯中,该通讯在医院的所有临床领域分发。在接下来的几年里,人们对我们的文章一直保持着持久的兴趣,而老年医学专家迈克尔·伍德沃德博士的加入进一步加强了我们的编辑团队。当《华尔街日报》同意发表我们1991年以来的文章时,专栏的专业性得到了显著提升,从而扩大了发行量。迈克尔在编辑委员会的领导下,文章发表在《杂志》上,作者能够在最初的主要目标之外被招募到Repat医院,多年来,来自澳大利亚各地的主要医生都贡献了文章。随着临床药学实践的发展和成熟,在老年人护理方面具有专业知识的药剂师也被邀请贡献文章。《老年治疗学》系列(最近被称为《老年治疗学评论》)也很大程度上归功于Rohan Elliott的奉献和无与伦比的承诺,他于1999年加入编辑委员会,并于2014年成为编辑。如果没有他的投入,《老年治疗学评论》不可能取得37年的辉煌成就。作为一个在里帕特医院开始的小型内部出版物,这个系列已经很不错了。多年来,《老年治疗学评论》系列巧妙地跟上了随着老年医学和老年护理领域蓬勃发展而出现的信息洪流。我推荐所有对治疗学和老年护理感兴趣的人阅读Rohan和Michael的综合文章,它记录了老年治疗学的前30年。在此期间,出现了许多新的药物和使用旧药物的新方法,说明需要不断更新知识。今天,医生和药剂师对老年人的药物管理有了更大的认识和知识。我真诚地感谢Rohan、Michael、David和其他许多人对这项事业的持续承诺,并向《老年治疗学评论》告别——这是一项非常出色的工作,使命已经完成。作者声明她没有利益冲突。这项研究没有得到任何公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构的特别资助。
{"title":"A trip down memory lane: 37 years of Geriatric Therapeutics","authors":"Robyn J. Saunders BPharm, Grad Dip Hosp Pharm, AACPA","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1907","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1907","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is with great pleasure and pride that I introduce this reprint of Rohan Elliott and Michael Woodward's article, ‘Thirty years of Geriatric Therapeutics’, originally published in 2016.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As a founding member of the Geriatric Therapeutics Editorial Committee in 1986, reading this article feels like a nostalgic stroll down memory lane, to a time where knowledge of the impact of ageing on medication safety was limited, and we were innocently oblivious to the impending explosion of information and therapeutic advances that lay ahead.</p><p>Driven by altruistic ambition, in 1986 the pharmacy department at Melbourne's Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital (‘the Repat’) embarked on an educational mission to improve prescribing for our ageing war veteran population. Our aim was to raise prescribers' awareness of the fact that older individuals handle medications differently, and respond differently, compared to their younger counterparts. To achieve this aim, we approached consultant physicians at the Repat, requesting them to write an article within their specialty, with a focus on treating older people. By doing so, we aimed to deepen their understanding of the complexities associated with elderly patients. We hoped that this subtle approach would enhance the consultant's knowledge, while also educating a broader clinical readership.</p><p>Fortunately, the newly appointed director of geriatrics at the Repat, Dr David Fonda, enthusiastically agreed to join our small editorial team. It was his task to approach the consultants and encourage their contributions to the newsletter. We had no reservations about leveraging our greatest asset: it was indeed challenging for authors to decline David's requests. Each Geriatric Therapeutics article was published in the pharmacy's monthly newsletter, which was distributed across all clinical areas within the hospital.</p><p>The enduring interest in our articles persisted over the ensuing years and was further bolstered by the addition of geriatrician Dr Michael Woodward to the editorial team. The column's professionalism received a significant boost when this <i>Journal</i> agreed to publish our articles from 1991, leading to an expanded distribution. With Michael at the helm of the editorial committee, and articles published in the <i>Journal</i>, authors were able to be recruited beyond the initial primary targets at the Repat hospital, and over the years leading physicians from throughout Australia contributed articles. As clinical pharmacy practice developed and matured, pharmacists with expertise in the care of older people were also invited to contribute articles.</p><p>The Geriatric Therapeutics series (more recently known as Geriatric Therapeutics Review) also owes much to the dedication and unparalleled commitment of Rohan Elliott, who joined the editorial committee in 1999 and became the editor in 2014. Without his input, Geriatric Therapeutics Review would not have achieved a remark","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"328-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1907","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139604514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stability of extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions 临时配制的氯法齐明口服混悬液的稳定性
IF 2.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1893
Ellie Ponsonby-Thomas BPharmSc, Charis Lau BPharm, Sherine Tan BPharm, Malinda Salim PhD, Ben J. Boyd PhD

Background

Clofazimine is recommended as a treatment for tuberculosis in infants. Extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions are more appropriate dosage forms for infants than tablets, however no data exist to inform appropriate storage conditions.

Aim

To examine the physical and chemical stability of extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions and determine appropriate storage conditions.

Method

An oral suspension of clofazimine 10 mg/mL was prepared by grinding six 100 mg clofazimine tablets to produce a fine powder. Ora-Blend SF (sugar free) was added to make a final volume of 60 mL. Six 10 mL aliquots were placed in amber plastic bottles with plastic bottle caps. Three bottles were stored at room temperature, and three bottles were refrigerated at 4°C. Following shaking, a 1 mL sample was taken from each bottle on days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 60. Samples were assayed using the high-performance liquid chromatography method. The samples were visually examined for colour change and separation at each time point. Stability was defined as the retention of at least 90% of the initial concentration. Ethics approval was not required for this research article as it was a stability study that did not involve human subjects.

Results

The clofazimine content remained >94% of the initial concentration throughout the 60-day period for samples that were kept at room temperature, and slightly <90% (87.4%) for samples that were kept refrigerated at 4°C. No separation or colour change was noted throughout the 60-day period for both preparations.

Conclusion

Extemporaneously prepared suspensions of clofazimine in Ora-Blend SF were chemically stable for at least 60 days when stored at room temperature. Clofazimine degraded slightly more rapidly at 4°C compared to room temperature.

氯唑明被推荐用于治疗婴儿结核病。研究临时制备的氯唑明口服混悬液的物理和化学稳定性,并确定适当的储存条件。将 6 片 100 毫克的氯唑明药片研磨成细粉,制备氯唑明 10 毫克/毫升的口服混悬液。加入 Ora-Blend SF(无糖),最终体积为 60 mL。将六份 10 毫升的等分样品装入带有塑料瓶盖的琥珀色塑料瓶中。三瓶室温保存,三瓶 4°C 冷藏。摇匀后,在第 0、7、14、28 和 60 天从每个瓶中各取 1 毫升样品。样品采用高效液相色谱法进行检测。目测样品在每个时间点的颜色变化和分离情况。稳定性的定义是保留至少 90% 的初始浓度。在室温下保存 60 天的样品中,氯法齐明的含量始终保持在初始浓度的 94% 以上,而在 4°C 冷藏条件下保存的样品中,氯法齐明的含量略低于 90%(87.4%)。两种制剂在 60 天内均未出现分离或颜色变化。在室温下保存至少 60 天,Ora-Blend SF 中临时制备的氯唑明悬浮液化学性质稳定。与室温相比,氯唑明在 4°C 下的降解速度稍快。
{"title":"Stability of extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions","authors":"Ellie Ponsonby-Thomas BPharmSc,&nbsp;Charis Lau BPharm,&nbsp;Sherine Tan BPharm,&nbsp;Malinda Salim PhD,&nbsp;Ben J. Boyd PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1893","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1893","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clofazimine is recommended as a treatment for tuberculosis in infants. Extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions are more appropriate dosage forms for infants than tablets, however no data exist to inform appropriate storage conditions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the physical and chemical stability of extemporaneously prepared clofazimine oral suspensions and determine appropriate storage conditions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An oral suspension of clofazimine 10 mg/mL was prepared by grinding six 100 mg clofazimine tablets to produce a fine powder. Ora-Blend SF (sugar free) was added to make a final volume of 60 mL. Six 10 mL aliquots were placed in amber plastic bottles with plastic bottle caps. Three bottles were stored at room temperature, and three bottles were refrigerated at 4°C. Following shaking, a 1 mL sample was taken from each bottle on days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 60. Samples were assayed using the high-performance liquid chromatography method. The samples were visually examined for colour change and separation at each time point. Stability was defined as the retention of at least 90% of the initial concentration. Ethics approval was not required for this research article as it was a stability study that did not involve human subjects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The clofazimine content remained &gt;94% of the initial concentration throughout the 60-day period for samples that were kept at room temperature, and slightly &lt;90% (87.4%) for samples that were kept refrigerated at 4°C. No separation or colour change was noted throughout the 60-day period for both preparations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Extemporaneously prepared suspensions of clofazimine in Ora-Blend SF were chemically stable for at least 60 days when stored at room temperature. Clofazimine degraded slightly more rapidly at 4°C compared to room temperature.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 1","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1893","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139527073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The challenge of drug prescribing for older people 为老年人开药的挑战
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1904
David Fonda MB BS, BMedSc(Hon), FRACP, FAFRM, MD
<p>It is with pleasure that I write this introduction to the reprint of the first article in the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, published in this <i>Journal</i> in 1991 (then known as the <i>Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</i>).<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Geriatric Therapeutics initiative arose from the Pharmacy Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, with support from the Aged and Extended Care Department.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Initially published as an internal bulletin from 1986 to 1990, its aim was to provide awareness to the physicians at the hospital to the special needs of the older veteran population. Geriatric medicine as a specialty was very much in its infancy at that time, and patients were generally treated under similar guidelines as the general younger adult population. I had the opportunity to write the first article for the bulletin in 1986, entitled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’. That early version was re-written for the <i>Journal</i> in 1991.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>As I look back now to 1983, when I became the first geriatrician to be appointed to an acute care hospital in Victoria, the number of geriatricians overall was exceptionally low. Today, geriatric medicine is the largest training specialty within the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), with 392 trainees, ahead of other specialties such as oncology (268), cardiology (245) and respiratory medicine (242). This remarkable evolution of geriatric medicine as a specialty in Australia is a recognition of the significant ageing of the population and the special needs it brings to their care. The life expectancy at birth in 1983 was 71.4 years for males and 78.0 years for females. In 2021, it was 81.3 years and 85.4 years respectively.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This marked increase in life expectancy has resulted in older people now making up a very large proportion of patients in acute care hospitals and large numbers of older people requiring rehabilitation, care at home and residential aged care services. Hence, issues related to drug prescribing are even more important today and need to be understood by all involved.</p><p>The first Geriatric Therapeutics article highlighted the reasons for increased vulnerability of older people to adverse drug outcomes, which included altered pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atypical disease presentation, inappropriate prescribing, use of non-prescribed over-the-counter medications, drug hoarding and issues with poor drug compliance.<span><sup>1</sup></span> These issues remain equally relevant today, but with some added caveats.</p><p>Since 1986 a plethora of new drugs have been developed, along with guidelines for various conditions that add more drugs to a patient's list, leading to much higher rates of polypharmacy.<span><sup>4</sup></span> For example, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and stroke result in the presc
我很高兴地为1991年发表在本杂志(当时被称为澳大利亚医院药学杂志)上的“老年治疗学”系列第一篇文章的再版撰写这篇介绍老年治疗倡议是由墨尔本海德堡遣返医院的药学系发起的,得到了老年和长期护理部的支持。2最初于1986年至1990年作为内部公报出版,其目的是使医院的医生认识到老年退伍军人的特殊需要。老年医学作为一门专业在当时还处于起步阶段,患者通常在与一般年轻人相似的指导下接受治疗。1986年,我有机会为公报写了第一篇文章,题为“老年人吸毒的相关问题”。1991年,我为《华尔街日报》重写了早期的版本。现在回想1983年,当我成为第一位被任命到维多利亚州一家急症护理医院工作的老年病医生时,老年病医生的总数特别少。今天,老年医学是澳大利亚皇家医师学院(RACP)最大的培训专业,有392名学员,领先于其他专业,如肿瘤学(268)、心脏病学(245)和呼吸医学(242)。在澳大利亚,老年医学作为一门专业的显著发展是对人口显著老龄化及其对老年人护理的特殊需求的认识。1983年出生时的预期寿命男性为71.4岁,女性为78.0岁。到2021年,分别为81.3岁和85.4岁预期寿命的显著增加导致老年人在急症护理医院的病人中占很大比例,大量老年人需要康复、在家护理和老年住院护理服务。因此,与药物处方有关的问题在今天更加重要,需要所有相关人员都了解。第一篇《老年治疗学》文章强调了老年人更容易受到药物不良后果影响的原因,包括药代动力学改变、多种药物、多种合并症、非典型疾病表现、不适当的处方、使用非处方非处方药、药物囤积和药物依从性差的问题这些问题在今天仍然同样重要,但有一些额外的警告。自1986年以来,大量的新药被开发出来,同时还有针对各种疾病的指导方针,在病人的清单上增加了更多的药物,导致了更高的多药制例如,缺血性心脏病、心力衰竭、糖尿病和中风会导致开出一套药物处方,从而导致未知的药物相互作用,以及更大的潜在副作用和不遵守规定的风险。大多数药物试验并不针对老年人群。药物试验的严格排除标准使得将结果外推到老年人,特别是那些有合并症和多种药物的老年人,非常困难。在老年人中,非药物治疗通常优于药物治疗,特别是对于影响心理健康的疾病。但是,对于使用药物来控制行为的许多脆弱的老年患者来说,这往往是不可用的、不可获得的或不切实际的。皇家老年护理质量和安全委员会(2018-2021)发现了这一冲突,今天许多患者服用了可能不合适的抗精神病药、抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药。在给老年人开处方时,医生和药剂师面临的挑战比以往任何时候都要多,他们首先要确定现有的药物是否会导致患者出现问题,因为这些问题有时会以微妙或非典型的方式表现出来,例如疲劳、精神错乱、跌倒或认知能力下降。有不良反应的药品或者不必要的药品应当开处方。如果觉得有必要使用一种新药,重要的是要以尽可能低的剂量开始适当的药物,并在重新评估其有效性和耐受性的同时慢慢增加剂量。“低起点,慢节奏”这句古老的格言仍然很重要,如果没有发现任何好处,那么就放弃或停止。最后,在为老年人开处方或配药时,重要的是提供清晰的书面说明,因为在预约时或出院时提供的重要信息往往没有被很好地听到、理解或记住。随着时间的推移,给老年人开处方的挑战只会越来越大,有许多新药上市,而老药也有多个商标名。所有这些药物的相互作用,特别是当存在共存的合并症时,更加剧了这些挑战。 在过去的37年里,《老年治疗学》系列在教育临床医生了解这些不断变化的挑战方面发挥了重要作用。作者声明无利益冲突。本文未收到任何资助。
{"title":"The challenge of drug prescribing for older people","authors":"David Fonda MB BS, BMedSc(Hon), FRACP, FAFRM, MD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1904","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1904","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;It is with pleasure that I write this introduction to the reprint of the first article in the ‘Geriatric Therapeutics’ series, published in this &lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt; in 1991 (then known as the &lt;i&gt;Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The Geriatric Therapeutics initiative arose from the Pharmacy Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, with support from the Aged and Extended Care Department.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Initially published as an internal bulletin from 1986 to 1990, its aim was to provide awareness to the physicians at the hospital to the special needs of the older veteran population. Geriatric medicine as a specialty was very much in its infancy at that time, and patients were generally treated under similar guidelines as the general younger adult population. I had the opportunity to write the first article for the bulletin in 1986, entitled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’. That early version was re-written for the &lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt; in 1991.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I look back now to 1983, when I became the first geriatrician to be appointed to an acute care hospital in Victoria, the number of geriatricians overall was exceptionally low. Today, geriatric medicine is the largest training specialty within the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), with 392 trainees, ahead of other specialties such as oncology (268), cardiology (245) and respiratory medicine (242). This remarkable evolution of geriatric medicine as a specialty in Australia is a recognition of the significant ageing of the population and the special needs it brings to their care. The life expectancy at birth in 1983 was 71.4 years for males and 78.0 years for females. In 2021, it was 81.3 years and 85.4 years respectively.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This marked increase in life expectancy has resulted in older people now making up a very large proportion of patients in acute care hospitals and large numbers of older people requiring rehabilitation, care at home and residential aged care services. Hence, issues related to drug prescribing are even more important today and need to be understood by all involved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The first Geriatric Therapeutics article highlighted the reasons for increased vulnerability of older people to adverse drug outcomes, which included altered pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atypical disease presentation, inappropriate prescribing, use of non-prescribed over-the-counter medications, drug hoarding and issues with poor drug compliance.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; These issues remain equally relevant today, but with some added caveats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since 1986 a plethora of new drugs have been developed, along with guidelines for various conditions that add more drugs to a patient's list, leading to much higher rates of polypharmacy.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; For example, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and stroke result in the presc","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"302-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1904","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139627163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Farewell to the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series: the end of the beginning 告别《老年治疗学评论》丛书:结束的开始
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1900
Rohan A. Elliott BPharm, BPharmSc (Hons), MClinPharm, PhD, FSHP, FANZCAP (GeriMed, Research)

The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series (originally Geriatric Therapeutics) began as a local publication at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne in 1986. Its aim was to raise awareness and educate physicians about the special considerations needed when prescribing for ‘geriatric’ patients, at a time when there were few guidelines and reference texts to guide prescribing for older people. Geriatric Therapeutics Review articles have been published in the Journal since 1991, expanding its audience to pharmacists and other readers. For many years, reprints were distributed to members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine.

Nearly 40 years later, the landscape has changed. Geriatric medicine has become one of the largest medical specialties in Australia, and an area of specialisation for many Australian pharmacists working in hospitals, residential care, and primary care. Information, guidelines, and professional development related to prescribing and medication management for older people are readily accessible.

The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series, comprising 146 peer-reviewed articles covering many areas of therapeutics and medication management (Table 1), has made a significant contribution to increased awareness and knowledge, thus achieving its aim. And so, the time has come to draw the series to a close.

This issue of the Journal celebrates the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series by looking back at a selection of vintage and seminal articles. Each article is accompanied by an introduction and commentary from a past author or guest commentator. There are also two new articles to round out the series.

We start with a reprint of the first Geriatric Therapeutics article published in the Journal, in 1991, titled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’.1 This article was written by Dr David Fonda, the first geriatrician appointed at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital (in 1983). David has also written the accompanying introduction and commentary, in which he reflects on the state of geriatric medicine in the 1980s, the origins of the Geriatric Therapeutics series, and how medication use has changed since he wrote his original article more than 30 years ago. Although much has changed, many of the problems addressed in David's original article remain relevant today.

Next is a reprint of an article on diabetes from 1991, written by the late Dr Mario De Luise.2 The introduction and commentary are written by Dr Tilenka Thynne, clinical pharmacologist and endocrinologist. Tilenka's commentary reflects on the limited treatment options that were available in the 1990s and the huge advances in diabetes therapeutics that have occurred since. As therapeutic options for diabetes evolved over the years, the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series published additional articles on this topic, including one co-au

《老年治疗学评论》系列(最初是《老年治疗学》)于1986年在墨尔本海德堡遣返医院作为当地出版物开始出版。其目的是提高认识并教育医生在为“老年”患者开处方时需要特别注意的事项,因为目前很少有指导老年人开处方的指南和参考文本。自1991年以来,《老年治疗学评论》的文章已在该杂志上发表,将其读者扩大到药剂师和其他读者。多年来,再版分发给澳大利亚和新西兰老年医学协会的成员。近40年后,情况发生了变化。老年医学已成为澳大利亚最大的医学专业之一,也是许多在医院、住院护理和初级保健工作的澳大利亚药剂师的专业领域。与老年人的处方和药物管理有关的信息、指南和专业发展是很容易获得的。《老年治疗学评论》系列,包括146篇同行评议的文章,涵盖治疗学和药物管理的许多领域(表1),为提高认识和知识做出了重大贡献,从而实现了其目标。所以,是时候结束这个系列了。这一期的杂志庆祝老年治疗评论系列回顾了选择的复古和开创性的文章。每篇文章都附有过去作者或客座评论员的介绍和评论。本系列还有两篇新文章。我们从1991年发表在《老年治疗学》杂志上的第一篇文章的重印版开始,文章的标题是“与老年人吸毒有关的问题”本文由David Fonda博士撰写,他是海德堡遣返医院任命的第一位老年病专家(1983年)。David还撰写了随附的介绍和评论,其中他反思了20世纪80年代老年医学的状况,老年治疗系列的起源,以及自他30多年前撰写原始文章以来药物使用的变化。尽管发生了很大的变化,但David最初文章中提到的许多问题今天仍然相关。下面是已故的Mario De luise博士1991年撰写的一篇关于糖尿病的文章的转载。2引言和评论由临床药理学家和内分泌学家Tilenka Thynne博士撰写。蒂伦卡的评论反映了20世纪90年代有限的治疗选择,以及自那以后糖尿病治疗的巨大进步。多年来,随着糖尿病治疗方案的发展,《老年治疗评论》(Geriatric Therapeutics Review)系列发表了更多关于这一主题的文章,其中包括2016年由Tilenka合著的一篇关于钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2受体抑制剂的文章。3然后,我们有一篇由Malcolm Hopwood博士和Philip morris博士撰写的关于阿尔茨海默病的第一篇老年医学治疗文章的重印版。4这篇文章发表于1994年,当时还没有有效的治疗痴呆症的选择,而第一种胆碱酯酶抑制剂(他克林)即将上市。本文的介绍和评论由Michael Woodward副教授撰写。Michael是海德堡遣返医院第二位被任命的老年病专家(1988年),并于1990年至2014年担任《老年治疗学》杂志编辑委员会主席。Michael职业生涯的大部分时间都用于阿尔茨海默病的临床试验。在他的评论中,他回顾了阿尔茨海默病药物开发的漫长、充满挑战、有时令人沮丧的历程。第四次重印是Michael Woodward在2003年发表的一篇开创性的论文,题为“通过减少用药,减少处方是老年人获得更好健康结果的一种手段”这是在已发表的文献中第一次使用“描述”这个词。在随附的评论中,Ian Scott教授,一位著名的开处方研究人员和临床医生,反思了过去20年来开处方研究和实践的演变,指出“开处方”现在已经成为医学词汇的一部分,并被视为改善药物安全和患者健康的临床实践的一个重要方面,特别是对老年人而言。这四个重印版和他们的评论一起突出了治疗学在过去四十年中的发展。继续这个主题,第五次也是最后一次转载是我和迈克尔·伍德沃德在2016年写的一篇文章,当时是《老年治疗评论》系列出版30周年。 在这篇文章中,我们描述了几十年来治疗方法的变化,这些疾病是该系列中多篇文章的主题,包括慢性疼痛,充血性心力衰竭,抑郁症,癫痫,骨质疏松症等等。这篇文章强调了多年来药物的数量和种类(以及它们的使用方式)是如何发生巨大变化的,这使得治疗和药物管理在今天变得更加复杂这篇文章是由Robyn Saunders介绍的,他在20世纪80年代作为海德堡遣返医院的药剂师,构思了《老年治疗学》系列,并在《老年治疗学》编辑委员会工作了28年。我们以两篇新文章结束本期和《老年治疗学评论》系列,讨论到目前为止该系列尚未涉及的主题。第一篇文章由Sara Yeganeh和Arron Sparkes撰写,讨论了感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的老年人的药物管理。鉴于艾滋病毒感染者的预期寿命增加,这是一个日益相关和重要的话题。7第二篇文章是对维生素B12缺乏症的预防、诊断和管理的回顾,维生素B12缺乏症是老年人常见但往往未被认识到的问题,如果不治疗可能会造成严重后果最后一篇文章是由海德堡遣返医院老年护理药剂师Nadia Mouchaileh撰写的。本期特刊中当代和历史文章的结合,以及客座评论提供了《老年治疗评论》系列的视野和范围,使其如此成功。如果没有药剂师Robyn Saunders和Geoff Sussman的远见卓识,编辑委员会(特别是领导委员会超过20年的Michael Woodward和Robyn Saunders)的辛勤工作和奉献精神,《华尔街日报》的执行编辑(特别是Jenny Johnston和Benafsha Khariwala),以及许多作者和同行评审员,这个系列是不可能完成的如果没有《华尔街日报》主编和澳大利亚医院药剂师协会的支持,这一切也不会发生。对我个人来说,在过去的24年里,作为编辑委员会成员、作者和编辑,为这个系列做出贡献是一种莫大的荣幸。很高兴看到医生和药剂师对老年医学的兴趣、意识和知识在这一时期的发展,以及优秀的参考资料、指导方针和教育计划,以帮助临床医生照顾老年人。然而,为了确保老年人的最佳用药管理,仍有许多工作要做,因为不适当和不必要的处方和不良的用药结果仍然普遍存在因此,尽管《老年治疗学评论》系列将不复存在,但这并不是结束;但是,对于老年人来说,这可能是安全而适当的治疗方法的“开始的结束”。Rohan A Elliot是《药学实践与研究》杂志的副主编。他被排除在与这篇社论的接受和发表有关的编辑决策之外。作者没有收到任何公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构的具体资助。委托,而不是外部同行评审。
{"title":"Farewell to the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series: the end of the beginning","authors":"Rohan A. Elliott BPharm, BPharmSc (Hons), MClinPharm, PhD, FSHP, FANZCAP (GeriMed, Research)","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1900","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1900","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series (originally Geriatric Therapeutics) began as a local publication at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne in 1986. Its aim was to raise awareness and educate physicians about the special considerations needed when prescribing for ‘geriatric’ patients, at a time when there were few guidelines and reference texts to guide prescribing for older people. Geriatric Therapeutics Review articles have been published in the <i>Journal</i> since 1991, expanding its audience to pharmacists and other readers. For many years, reprints were distributed to members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine.</p><p>Nearly 40 years later, the landscape has changed. Geriatric medicine has become one of the largest medical specialties in Australia, and an area of specialisation for many Australian pharmacists working in hospitals, residential care, and primary care. Information, guidelines, and professional development related to prescribing and medication management for older people are readily accessible.</p><p>The Geriatric Therapeutics Review series, comprising 146 peer-reviewed articles covering many areas of therapeutics and medication management (Table 1), has made a significant contribution to increased awareness and knowledge, thus achieving its aim. And so, the time has come to draw the series to a close.</p><p>This issue of the <i>Journal</i> celebrates the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series by looking back at a selection of vintage and seminal articles. Each article is accompanied by an introduction and commentary from a past author or guest commentator. There are also two new articles to round out the series.</p><p>We start with a reprint of the first Geriatric Therapeutics article published in the <i>Journal</i>, in 1991, titled ‘Problems associated with drug use in the elderly’.<span><sup>1</sup></span> This article was written by Dr David Fonda, the first geriatrician appointed at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital (in 1983). David has also written the accompanying introduction and commentary, in which he reflects on the state of geriatric medicine in the 1980s, the origins of the Geriatric Therapeutics series, and how medication use has changed since he wrote his original article more than 30 years ago. Although much has changed, many of the problems addressed in David's original article remain relevant today.</p><p>Next is a reprint of an article on diabetes from 1991, written by the late Dr Mario De Luise.<span><sup>2</sup></span> The introduction and commentary are written by Dr Tilenka Thynne, clinical pharmacologist and endocrinologist. Tilenka's commentary reflects on the limited treatment options that were available in the 1990s and the huge advances in diabetes therapeutics that have occurred since. As therapeutic options for diabetes evolved over the years, the Geriatric Therapeutics Review series published additional articles on this topic, including one co-au","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"299-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1900","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138944672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vitamin B12 deficiency in older people: a practical approach to recognition and management 老年人维生素 B12 缺乏症:识别和管理的实用方法
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1897
Nadia Mouchaileh BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac

Vitamin B12 deficiency is common in older people and is linked to anaemia, cognitive decline, and dementia. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from no symptoms or subtle, non-specific symptoms, through to serious, irreversible neurological symptoms if left untreated. Although common, it is often under-recognised, with diagnosis usually occurring on incidental blood test screening. Older people are at increased risk of vitamin B12 deficiency due to insufficient dietary intake, malabsorption associated with aged-related changes in gastrointestinal function, higher incidence of pernicious anaemia, and chronic use of interfering medications such as metformin and proton-pump inhibitors. Early detection and treatment in symptomatic deficiency are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Vitamin B12 intramuscular injection bypasses potential absorption issues and is traditionally the first-line treatment in older people. However, emerging evidence suggests that high-dose oral replacement may be as effective. Older people often require lifelong therapy due to the irreversible nature of the underlying cause of deficiency. This review provides an overview of vitamin B12 deficiency and its management in older people.

维生素 B12 缺乏症在老年人中很常见,与贫血、认知能力下降和痴呆症有关。临床表现多种多样,从无症状或细微的非特异性症状,到严重的不可逆转的神经系统症状(如不及时治疗)。这种疾病虽然常见,但往往未被充分认识,通常是在偶然的验血筛查中才被诊断出来。由于膳食摄入不足、与年龄有关的胃肠功能变化导致的吸收不良、恶性贫血发病率较高以及长期服用二甲双胍和质子泵抑制剂等干扰性药物,老年人患维生素 B12 缺乏症的风险增加。早期发现和治疗无症状的缺乏症对于防止不可逆转的损害至关重要。维生素 B12 肌肉注射可绕过潜在的吸收问题,传统上是老年人的一线治疗方法。然而,新的证据表明,大剂量口服补充剂可能同样有效。由于缺乏症的根本原因具有不可逆的性质,老年人通常需要终生接受治疗。本综述概述了老年人维生素 B12 缺乏症及其治疗。
{"title":"Vitamin B12 deficiency in older people: a practical approach to recognition and management","authors":"Nadia Mouchaileh BPharm, GradCertPharmPrac","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1897","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jppr.1897","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vitamin B<sub>12</sub> deficiency is common in older people and is linked to anaemia, cognitive decline, and dementia. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from no symptoms or subtle, non-specific symptoms, through to serious, irreversible neurological symptoms if left untreated. Although common, it is often under-recognised, with diagnosis usually occurring on incidental blood test screening. Older people are at increased risk of vitamin B<sub>12</sub> deficiency due to insufficient dietary intake, malabsorption associated with aged-related changes in gastrointestinal function, higher incidence of pernicious anaemia, and chronic use of interfering medications such as metformin and proton-pump inhibitors. Early detection and treatment in symptomatic deficiency are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Vitamin B<sub>12</sub> intramuscular injection bypasses potential absorption issues and is traditionally the first-line treatment in older people. However, emerging evidence suggests that high-dose oral replacement may be as effective. Older people often require lifelong therapy due to the irreversible nature of the underlying cause of deficiency. This review provides an overview of vitamin B<sub>12</sub> deficiency and its management in older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 6","pages":"350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1897","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139174980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1