Robert Scragg, Pamela von Hurst, Anastassios Pittas
In this viewpoint, we recommend that general practitioners and other primary care providers in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) discuss vitamin D supplementation with patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, as part of a broader strategy for diabetes prevention, including weight loss and other lifestyle changes.
{"title":"Vitamin D supplementation in adults with pre-diabetes.","authors":"Robert Scragg, Pamela von Hurst, Anastassios Pittas","doi":"10.1071/HC25213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this viewpoint, we recommend that general practitioners and other primary care providers in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) discuss vitamin D supplementation with patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, as part of a broader strategy for diabetes prevention, including weight loss and other lifestyle changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi, Anitra Carr, Chelsea Harris, Dee Mangin, Ben Hudson
Introduction: General practitioners with special interests (GPwSIs) and extended roles (GPwERs) have been developed internationally to expand access to specialist expertise and relieve secondary care pressure, but their implementation and evaluation in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) remain unexplored.
Aim: This scoping review mapped the roles, service models, and clinical applications of GPwSIs/GPwERs in NZ.
Methods: An online search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for literature published up to July 2025. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included peer-reviewed publications focused on GPwSI/GPwER roles in NZ.
Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which were retrospective clinical audits conducted between 2007 and 2019. Three were comparative studies, and two were single-practitioner audits. Two studies focused on skin cancer excision, while the remaining addressed diabetes care, varicose vein treatment, and public otolaryngology services. The skin cancer studies, conducted a decade apart (2007 and 2017), reported improved malignant lesion diagnosis by GPwSIs compared to other vocational specialists (general practitioners and surgeons). The GPwSI otolaryngology model demonstrated greater efficiency and effectiveness than standard hospital outpatient clinics. Diabetes and varicose vein audits, both single-practitioner audits, found improved effectiveness and safe clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: This review identified a limited body of literature describing GPwSI /GPwER roles in NZ. The findings highlight variation in role implementation, service models, and outcome reporting. Further research is needed to examine the breadth, consistency, sustainability, and potential benefits and unintended impacts of these extended general practice roles within the NZ health system.
{"title":"Mapping the service models and outcomes from general practitioners with special interests/extended roles in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Scoping review.","authors":"Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi, Anitra Carr, Chelsea Harris, Dee Mangin, Ben Hudson","doi":"10.1071/HC25174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General practitioners with special interests (GPwSIs) and extended roles (GPwERs) have been developed internationally to expand access to specialist expertise and relieve secondary care pressure, but their implementation and evaluation in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This scoping review mapped the roles, service models, and clinical applications of GPwSIs/GPwERs in NZ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for literature published up to July 2025. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included peer-reviewed publications focused on GPwSI/GPwER roles in NZ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which were retrospective clinical audits conducted between 2007 and 2019. Three were comparative studies, and two were single-practitioner audits. Two studies focused on skin cancer excision, while the remaining addressed diabetes care, varicose vein treatment, and public otolaryngology services. The skin cancer studies, conducted a decade apart (2007 and 2017), reported improved malignant lesion diagnosis by GPwSIs compared to other vocational specialists (general practitioners and surgeons). The GPwSI otolaryngology model demonstrated greater efficiency and effectiveness than standard hospital outpatient clinics. Diabetes and varicose vein audits, both single-practitioner audits, found improved effectiveness and safe clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified a limited body of literature describing GPwSI /GPwER roles in NZ. The findings highlight variation in role implementation, service models, and outcome reporting. Further research is needed to examine the breadth, consistency, sustainability, and potential benefits and unintended impacts of these extended general practice roles within the NZ health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review investigates factors influencing baseline knowledge in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), with a focus on tools used to assess cardiac knowledge, demographic influences, and areas of patient understanding. Given the central role of primary care in chronic disease management, understanding these factors is essential for improving patient education and outcomes.
Methods: A systematic review of literature from January 2003 to December 2023 was conducted across databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Search terms targeted patient knowledge, assessment tools, and cardiovascular disease. Studies were included if they reported on demographic influences or specific knowledge domains in CVD, were published in English, and fell within the date range. Studies focusing solely on pre/post-intervention scores or non-cardiac populations were excluded.
Results: Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q) and its variants were the most used tools, appearing in 25 studies. Knowledge scores ranged from 40% to 89%, with most studies reporting scores between 60-79%. Higher education, income, and comorbidities were associated with better knowledge. Patients showed strong awareness of risk factors and dietary guidance, but limited understanding of psychosocial risks.
Discussion: This review highlights significant variability in CVD knowledge and the need for standardised assessment tools. In primary care, routine use of such tools during patient encounters can help identify knowledge gaps. Tailored education strategies that consider demographic and regional factors can enhance patient self-management and reduce cardiovascular risk.
{"title":"Factors influencing patient knowledge in cardiovascular disease management: A systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Kylie Short, Isabel Jamieson, Alison Dixon","doi":"10.1071/HC25130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review investigates factors influencing baseline knowledge in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), with a focus on tools used to assess cardiac knowledge, demographic influences, and areas of patient understanding. Given the central role of primary care in chronic disease management, understanding these factors is essential for improving patient education and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of literature from January 2003 to December 2023 was conducted across databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Search terms targeted patient knowledge, assessment tools, and cardiovascular disease. Studies were included if they reported on demographic influences or specific knowledge domains in CVD, were published in English, and fell within the date range. Studies focusing solely on pre/post-intervention scores or non-cardiac populations were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q) and its variants were the most used tools, appearing in 25 studies. Knowledge scores ranged from 40% to 89%, with most studies reporting scores between 60-79%. Higher education, income, and comorbidities were associated with better knowledge. Patients showed strong awareness of risk factors and dietary guidance, but limited understanding of psychosocial risks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review highlights significant variability in CVD knowledge and the need for standardised assessment tools. In primary care, routine use of such tools during patient encounters can help identify knowledge gaps. Tailored education strategies that consider demographic and regional factors can enhance patient self-management and reduce cardiovascular risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Vaccination rates for Pasifika in Aotearoa New Zealand have fallen dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. While the decline in the South Island is not as great as in areas of greater Pasifika concentration such as Auckland, rural Pasifika are under-represented in research and it is important to investigate their perspectives. Aim The study aimed to explore knowledge of and perspectives on childhood vaccinations of a diverse rural Pasifika community in the South Island of New Zealand, and to identify underlying reasons for the recent decline in immunisation rates. Methods Interviews and focus groups, informed by a talanoa approach, were conducted with twelve female members of the Pasifika community in a rural NZ town with a large and growing Pasifika community. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis followed by iterative, inductive thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified that underlie vaccine uptake: (1) Established norms; (2) Knowledge about vaccination; (3) Experiences of vaccination or diseases; (4) Health professionals' communication; (5) Logistic and practical concerns. Each theme encompasses both barriers and facilitators of vaccination. Discussion Rural Pasifika communities are disadvantaged in terms of healthcare access both by rurality, and by their minority ethnic status. Empowering individuals and communities to access, understand, and use health information is vital, especially for Pasifika navigating an unfamiliar system in rural areas, and when there have been negative vaccination experiences. Every health interaction should aim to build literacy, address concerns, and foster relationships, trust and understanding.
{"title":"Views on vaccination in a New Zealand rural Pasifika community: a qualitative study.","authors":"Jo Hilder, Jane Taafaki, Maria Stubbe","doi":"10.1071/HC25139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Vaccination rates for Pasifika in Aotearoa New Zealand have fallen dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. While the decline in the South Island is not as great as in areas of greater Pasifika concentration such as Auckland, rural Pasifika are under-represented in research and it is important to investigate their perspectives. Aim The study aimed to explore knowledge of and perspectives on childhood vaccinations of a diverse rural Pasifika community in the South Island of New Zealand, and to identify underlying reasons for the recent decline in immunisation rates. Methods Interviews and focus groups, informed by a talanoa approach, were conducted with twelve female members of the Pasifika community in a rural NZ town with a large and growing Pasifika community. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis followed by iterative, inductive thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified that underlie vaccine uptake: (1) Established norms; (2) Knowledge about vaccination; (3) Experiences of vaccination or diseases; (4) Health professionals' communication; (5) Logistic and practical concerns. Each theme encompasses both barriers and facilitators of vaccination. Discussion Rural Pasifika communities are disadvantaged in terms of healthcare access both by rurality, and by their minority ethnic status. Empowering individuals and communities to access, understand, and use health information is vital, especially for Pasifika navigating an unfamiliar system in rural areas, and when there have been negative vaccination experiences. Every health interaction should aim to build literacy, address concerns, and foster relationships, trust and understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Saisha Shetty, Alex Park, Estie Kruger, Mario Siervo, Marc Tennant
Introduction: Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects patients' lives by deteriorating their motor and non-motor functions through the loss of dopaminergic neurons. Medications remain the preferred option to manage Parkinson's disease symptoms. In Australia, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) supports access to essential medicines by subsidising their cost, making long-term treatment more affordable.
Aim: This study analyses the dispensing patterns of Parkinson's medications in Australia from 2012 to 2024, focusing on utilisation trends over time and shifts in prescribing practices.
Methods: We conducted a quantitative analysis using concessional PBS data. Key variables included cumulative and annual prescription counts, defined daily dose (DDD), and DDD per 1000 concessional population per day, classified by medication type and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code. Time trends were examined using linear regression, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were assessed to understand the relationship between changes over the year and time.
Results: A total of 14 medications were assessed, with an accumulated dispensing count of 11,493,423. Levodopa combined with Benserazide had the highest prescription count at 3,663,722 and a mean DDD per 1000 concessional population of 1.81, followed by Levodopa combined with Carbidopa. Linear regression showed strong correlations (r > 0.9) between prescription volume and time for the majority of medications assessed.
Discussion: The findings highlighted a preference for Levodopa-based therapies, combined with Benserazide or Carbidopa, and suggest shifts in prescription patterns. By identifying the dispensing patterns of Parkinson's medication, the study contributes to developing treatment trends for further analysis of these medications' distribution and consumption.
{"title":"Evaluating dispensing patterns of Parkinson's medications from 2012 to 2024 in Australia: insights from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme concessional database.","authors":"Saisha Shetty, Alex Park, Estie Kruger, Mario Siervo, Marc Tennant","doi":"10.1071/HC25112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects patients' lives by deteriorating their motor and non-motor functions through the loss of dopaminergic neurons. Medications remain the preferred option to manage Parkinson's disease symptoms. In Australia, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) supports access to essential medicines by subsidising their cost, making long-term treatment more affordable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study analyses the dispensing patterns of Parkinson's medications in Australia from 2012 to 2024, focusing on utilisation trends over time and shifts in prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quantitative analysis using concessional PBS data. Key variables included cumulative and annual prescription counts, defined daily dose (DDD), and DDD per 1000 concessional population per day, classified by medication type and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code. Time trends were examined using linear regression, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were assessed to understand the relationship between changes over the year and time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 medications were assessed, with an accumulated dispensing count of 11,493,423. Levodopa combined with Benserazide had the highest prescription count at 3,663,722 and a mean DDD per 1000 concessional population of 1.81, followed by Levodopa combined with Carbidopa. Linear regression showed strong correlations (r > 0.9) between prescription volume and time for the majority of medications assessed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlighted a preference for Levodopa-based therapies, combined with Benserazide or Carbidopa, and suggest shifts in prescription patterns. By identifying the dispensing patterns of Parkinson's medication, the study contributes to developing treatment trends for further analysis of these medications' distribution and consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Benjamin Mundy, Alison Fielding, Amanda Tapley, Sarah Gani, Rula Ali, Michael Bentley, Rachael Boland, Lina Zbaidi, Elizabeth Holliday, Jean Ball, Mieke van Driel, Linda Klein, Parker Magin
Introduction: External Clinical Teaching Visits (ECTVs) are formative workplace-based assessments involving experienced general practitioners (GPs), acting as external clinical teaching visitors (ECT visitors), observing trainees ('registrars') in practice. ECTVs are a core element of Australian GP vocational training. Remote modalities of ECTVs, introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, have continued alongside face-to-face ECTVs post-pandemic.
Aim: This study aimed to explore the characteristics and associations of ECTV content delivered by these different modalities.
Methods: From 2020 to 2021, GP registrars of three geographically defined regional training organisations were invited to complete a questionnaire after completing ECTVs. Outcomes included: (1) the frequency registrars were observed performing physical examination by an ECT visitor and (2) the frequency a physical examination was observed and discussed by the ECT visitor. Analyses employed univariable and multivariable logistic regressions.
Results: A total of 1394 questionnaires (for 44% of eligible ECTVs) were completed by 729 (58% of eligible) registrars. After exclusions, 1106 questionnaires were analysed. Eighty-two percent of visits were conducted by video. Overall, 87% of visits involved a registrar being observed performing a physical examination at least once, and 42% involved both observation and discussion of physical examination. On multivariable analysis, the odds of observation of physical examination were significantly less with video-conducted visits (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.49, P = 0.001).
Discussion: Remote ECTVs are an attractive option to reduce resource usage and logistical burden. However, key differences in the content of ECTVs delivered by remote modalities compared to those conducted face-to-face were found. A hybrid model ECTV program may be appropriate to ensure the educational integrity of ECTVs is maintained.
简介:外部临床教学访问(ectv)是一种基于工作场所的形成性评估,涉及经验丰富的全科医生(gp),作为外部临床教学访问者(ECT访问者),观察实习生(“注册员”)的实践。ectv是澳大利亚全科医生职业培训的核心内容。为应对COVID-19大流行而引入的远程ectv模式与大流行后的面对面ectv一起继续存在。目的:本研究旨在探讨这些不同方式传递的ECTV内容的特点和关联。方法:从2020年到2021年,邀请三个地理区域培训机构的GP注册者在完成ectv后填写问卷。结果包括:(1)观察频率登记员由ECT来访者进行身体检查;(2)观察和讨论ECT来访者进行身体检查的频率。分析采用单变量和多变量logistic回归。结果:共有1394份问卷(占合格ectv的44%)由729名登记员(占合格ectv的58%)完成。排除后,对1106份问卷进行分析。82%的访问是通过视频进行的。总体而言,87%的就诊涉及到观察到注册医生至少进行一次体检,42%涉及到观察和讨论体检。在多变量分析中,视频访问的体格检查观察的几率显著低于(OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.49, P = 0.001)。讨论:远程ectv是减少资源使用和后勤负担的一个有吸引力的选择。然而,通过远程方式进行的ectv与面对面进行的ectv相比,在内容上存在关键差异。混合模式的ECTV计划可能是适当的,以确保ECTV的教育完整性得到维护。
{"title":"Comparing physical examination in face-to-face and remote External Clinical Teaching Visits in general practice vocational training.","authors":"Benjamin Mundy, Alison Fielding, Amanda Tapley, Sarah Gani, Rula Ali, Michael Bentley, Rachael Boland, Lina Zbaidi, Elizabeth Holliday, Jean Ball, Mieke van Driel, Linda Klein, Parker Magin","doi":"10.1071/HC25144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>External Clinical Teaching Visits (ECTVs) are formative workplace-based assessments involving experienced general practitioners (GPs), acting as external clinical teaching visitors (ECT visitors), observing trainees ('registrars') in practice. ECTVs are a core element of Australian GP vocational training. Remote modalities of ECTVs, introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, have continued alongside face-to-face ECTVs post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the characteristics and associations of ECTV content delivered by these different modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2020 to 2021, GP registrars of three geographically defined regional training organisations were invited to complete a questionnaire after completing ECTVs. Outcomes included: (1) the frequency registrars were observed performing physical examination by an ECT visitor and (2) the frequency a physical examination was observed and discussed by the ECT visitor. Analyses employed univariable and multivariable logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1394 questionnaires (for 44% of eligible ECTVs) were completed by 729 (58% of eligible) registrars. After exclusions, 1106 questionnaires were analysed. Eighty-two percent of visits were conducted by video. Overall, 87% of visits involved a registrar being observed performing a physical examination at least once, and 42% involved both observation and discussion of physical examination. On multivariable analysis, the odds of observation of physical examination were significantly less with video-conducted visits (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.49, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Remote ECTVs are an attractive option to reduce resource usage and logistical burden. However, key differences in the content of ECTVs delivered by remote modalities compared to those conducted face-to-face were found. A hybrid model ECTV program may be appropriate to ensure the educational integrity of ECTVs is maintained.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The healthcare sector accounts for 4-5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Data regarding the environmental impact of general practice are lacking. Toitū Envirocare produced a report for the Carefirst Limited's general practice centres in Taranaki, concluding solid waste disposal to be their primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.
Aim: Considering the increasing need to address climate change, this study aimed to provide novel insight into waste and carbon emissions generated by general practice through audit data.
Method: A waste to landfill audit was conducted at four Taranaki general practices. Waste to landfill was collected for 3 days, then sorted to determine the amount which could have been diverted to recycling and composting.
Results: The potential diversion rate of audited landfilled rubbish ranged from 65 to 79.3%. Although Westown had a potential diversion rate of 68.3%, its existing recycling processes meant this equated to 25% of its total waste production. Of the other three practices, 59-65% of their total waste production could be diverted.
Discussion: It was recommended that all practices have recycling and composting bins, and to collect bottle caps, soft plastics, and batteries to further landfill diversion. These bins must be more available and visible. Ideally, each practice would have a 'waste champion' to educate staff and dispose of these recyclables at designated facilities. Recycling in a general practice setting can produce significant waste diversions from landfill, producing meaningful progress towards sustainable practice.
{"title":"Carbon emissions of urban general practice and waste to landfill audit: a quantitative case-study in New Zealand.","authors":"Darla Stroud-Bennett, Lachlan White, Kiyomi Kitagawa","doi":"10.1071/HC25089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The healthcare sector accounts for 4-5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Data regarding the environmental impact of general practice are lacking. Toitū Envirocare produced a report for the Carefirst Limited's general practice centres in Taranaki, concluding solid waste disposal to be their primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Considering the increasing need to address climate change, this study aimed to provide novel insight into waste and carbon emissions generated by general practice through audit data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A waste to landfill audit was conducted at four Taranaki general practices. Waste to landfill was collected for 3 days, then sorted to determine the amount which could have been diverted to recycling and composting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The potential diversion rate of audited landfilled rubbish ranged from 65 to 79.3%. Although Westown had a potential diversion rate of 68.3%, its existing recycling processes meant this equated to 25% of its total waste production. Of the other three practices, 59-65% of their total waste production could be diverted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was recommended that all practices have recycling and composting bins, and to collect bottle caps, soft plastics, and batteries to further landfill diversion. These bins must be more available and visible. Ideally, each practice would have a 'waste champion' to educate staff and dispose of these recyclables at designated facilities. Recycling in a general practice setting can produce significant waste diversions from landfill, producing meaningful progress towards sustainable practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: There is limited literature on dementia care, support or services within the New Zealand Chinese community, despite the Chinese community is one of the largest Asian ethnic groups in New Zealand.
Aim: To explore Chinese general practitioners (GPs)' perspectives on dementia services for the Chinese population in New Zealand; their perceived barriers and shortfalls, as well as improvement opportunities.
Methods: A qualitative study investigating the perspectives of Chinese GPs across metropolitan Auckland, New Zealand. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in 2024. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.
Results: Ten participants were interviewed. Thematic analysis of the interviews generated four main themes: (i) under-recognition of dementia and lack of dementia information; (ii) stigma and seeking help for dementia; (iii) lack of Chinese friendly dementia services and (iv) support for dementia, with the overarching theme of language and cultural barriers.
Discussion: There are significant barriers to accessing dementia services for the Chinese population in New Zealand, rooted in language and cultural differences, low awareness, stigma, and systemic inefficiencies. Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach that includes culturally tailored services, public education, care coordination, and policy changes.
{"title":"Are dementia services meeting the needs of Chinese New Zealanders? A qualitative study of Chinese general practitioners.","authors":"Hoi Kwan, Gary Cheung","doi":"10.1071/HC25137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is limited literature on dementia care, support or services within the New Zealand Chinese community, despite the Chinese community is one of the largest Asian ethnic groups in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore Chinese general practitioners (GPs)' perspectives on dementia services for the Chinese population in New Zealand; their perceived barriers and shortfalls, as well as improvement opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study investigating the perspectives of Chinese GPs across metropolitan Auckland, New Zealand. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in 2024. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were interviewed. Thematic analysis of the interviews generated four main themes: (i) under-recognition of dementia and lack of dementia information; (ii) stigma and seeking help for dementia; (iii) lack of Chinese friendly dementia services and (iv) support for dementia, with the overarching theme of language and cultural barriers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There are significant barriers to accessing dementia services for the Chinese population in New Zealand, rooted in language and cultural differences, low awareness, stigma, and systemic inefficiencies. Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach that includes culturally tailored services, public education, care coordination, and policy changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145604687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction In Aotearoa New Zealand, the responsibility for management of long Covid sits with primary care. GPs are often the first point of contact for these patients in a system that is already overburdened. Globally, patient experiences of accessing support for long Covid are varied. To date, the perspectives of New Zealanders living with the condition, on how best to support their care, have not been sought. Aim The aim of this study is to explore what a long Covid service should offer from the perspectives of those living with the condition. Methods Participants were recruited via the New Zealand long haulers Facebook group and individual interviews and discussions were conducted using Zoom. These were semi-structured with a few loosely structured questions to encourage discussion. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results Eighteen participants were recruited. Four themes were identified in the data: practical guidance to support the health care journey; training and collaboration between health professionals; personalised care; and opportunity for health system change. Discussion Overall, participants appeared to want interdisciplinary knowledge sharing; collaborative services with clear lines of communication and a person-centred approach to care. Many of these proposed suggestions for a long Covid clinic align with the Ministry of Health recommendations. However, to date, there is no addition support from Government to support these long Covid service recommendations.
{"title":"Suggestions for managing long Covid in primary care in Aotearoa New Zealand: a qualitative study.","authors":"Sarah Rhodes, Maia Tutbury","doi":"10.1071/HC25143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction In Aotearoa New Zealand, the responsibility for management of long Covid sits with primary care. GPs are often the first point of contact for these patients in a system that is already overburdened. Globally, patient experiences of accessing support for long Covid are varied. To date, the perspectives of New Zealanders living with the condition, on how best to support their care, have not been sought. Aim The aim of this study is to explore what a long Covid service should offer from the perspectives of those living with the condition. Methods Participants were recruited via the New Zealand long haulers Facebook group and individual interviews and discussions were conducted using Zoom. These were semi-structured with a few loosely structured questions to encourage discussion. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results Eighteen participants were recruited. Four themes were identified in the data: practical guidance to support the health care journey; training and collaboration between health professionals; personalised care; and opportunity for health system change. Discussion Overall, participants appeared to want interdisciplinary knowledge sharing; collaborative services with clear lines of communication and a person-centred approach to care. Many of these proposed suggestions for a long Covid clinic align with the Ministry of Health recommendations. However, to date, there is no addition support from Government to support these long Covid service recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145604780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: New approaches are needed to respond to increasing numbers of patients with type 2 diabetes and high HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin). This pilot supported additional care from five primary care nurses and community pharmacists for people with type 2 diabetes with high HbA1c.
Aim: To describe uptake, outcomes and experiences of a collaborative pharmacy and general practice diabetes programme.
Methods: Quantitative data from patients enrolled before 31 August 2022 included change in HbA1c and medication, and pharmacist activity. Interviews with seven patients, five pharmacists and four practice nurses were analysed thematically.
Results: The evaluation included 26 people with an average baseline HbA1c of 97.6 mmol/mol (range 69-136 mmol/mol), of whom 84.6% were Māori or Pacific peoples. HbA1c reduced by an average 25.2 mmol/mol; 20.7 mmol/mol for Māori and Pacific peoples. HbA1c reduced by ≥5 mmol/mol in 84.6% of service users, and 81.8% of Māori and Pacific peoples. HbA1c reductions were sustained an average 7.5 months after programme completion. Pharmacists tailored their actions to the individual. The programme was highly acceptable to patients, pharmacists and nurses, with generally good communication and trust between them. Understanding about diabetes and medication, and medication adherence improved. New, effective medicines and insulin were often introduced. Some participants described increased blood glucose testing and lifestyle changes. Diabetes distress and denial, goal setting, client understanding of HbA1c and dropouts need further attention. COVID-19, staffing changes and staff shortages impacted enrolments. Pharmacist mentoring may help enrolments.
Discussion: A collaborative pharmacy-general practice model has potential to improve HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes through relatively simple interventions.
{"title":"Feasibility and outcomes of a collaborative pharmacy and general practice service for people with type 2 diabetes with high HbA1c: a mixed methods study.","authors":"N Gauld, J Faletau, M Bentley, S Tutty","doi":"10.1071/HC25123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New approaches are needed to respond to increasing numbers of patients with type 2 diabetes and high HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin). This pilot supported additional care from five primary care nurses and community pharmacists for people with type 2 diabetes with high HbA1c.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe uptake, outcomes and experiences of a collaborative pharmacy and general practice diabetes programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative data from patients enrolled before 31 August 2022 included change in HbA1c and medication, and pharmacist activity. Interviews with seven patients, five pharmacists and four practice nurses were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation included 26 people with an average baseline HbA1c of 97.6 mmol/mol (range 69-136 mmol/mol), of whom 84.6% were Māori or Pacific peoples. HbA1c reduced by an average 25.2 mmol/mol; 20.7 mmol/mol for Māori and Pacific peoples. HbA1c reduced by ≥5 mmol/mol in 84.6% of service users, and 81.8% of Māori and Pacific peoples. HbA1c reductions were sustained an average 7.5 months after programme completion. Pharmacists tailored their actions to the individual. The programme was highly acceptable to patients, pharmacists and nurses, with generally good communication and trust between them. Understanding about diabetes and medication, and medication adherence improved. New, effective medicines and insulin were often introduced. Some participants described increased blood glucose testing and lifestyle changes. Diabetes distress and denial, goal setting, client understanding of HbA1c and dropouts need further attention. COVID-19, staffing changes and staff shortages impacted enrolments. Pharmacist mentoring may help enrolments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A collaborative pharmacy-general practice model has potential to improve HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes through relatively simple interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}