Michelle A Pokorny, Elizabeth A-L Holt, Hannah Fuller, Peter R Thorne
Introduction Traditionally, grommet post-surgical follow-up care has been undertaken by otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs), but in a large public outpatient ORL service in Auckland, New Zealand (Counties Manukau), this responsibility has been partially devolved to general practitioners (GPs). Aim The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives and experiences of families/whānau and GPs regarding grommet services for children. Methods A mixed methods approach was used with family/whānau comprising semi-structured interviews and a GP survey. Recruitment of families/whānau reflected the local demographic and all participants were primary carers of a child who had received grommet surgery between 2020 and 2021. All GPs were practising in clinics within the ORL service catchment area. Results Twenty-eight family/whānau interviews were conducted, and 22 GPs responded to the survey. Five main themes were identified: (1) awareness of child development; (2) challenges accessing health care; (3) responses to health information; (4) importance of aftercare; and (5) preference for service provision. Most (16) GP respondents reported they should not be responsible for post-surgical follow-up after grommet insertion. Lack of capacity and funding were identified as key barriers to GP-led follow-up. Discussion Families/whānau highly valued follow-up services and hearing evaluations after grommet insertion, and had a strong preference for clinicians with perceived expertise in ear and hearing care (ORLs and audiologists). They reported multiple barriers to receiving the desired care. Māori and Pacific families/whānau experienced additional delays for referrals into specialist services. GPs showed low support for primary care-led grommet follow-up care, with most not providing routine grommet checks after surgery.
{"title":"Exploration of family/whānau and general practitioner perspectives of paediatric grommet services: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Michelle A Pokorny, Elizabeth A-L Holt, Hannah Fuller, Peter R Thorne","doi":"10.1071/HC24083","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Traditionally, grommet post-surgical follow-up care has been undertaken by otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs), but in a large public outpatient ORL service in Auckland, New Zealand (Counties Manukau), this responsibility has been partially devolved to general practitioners (GPs). Aim The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives and experiences of families/whānau and GPs regarding grommet services for children. Methods A mixed methods approach was used with family/whānau comprising semi-structured interviews and a GP survey. Recruitment of families/whānau reflected the local demographic and all participants were primary carers of a child who had received grommet surgery between 2020 and 2021. All GPs were practising in clinics within the ORL service catchment area. Results Twenty-eight family/whānau interviews were conducted, and 22 GPs responded to the survey. Five main themes were identified: (1) awareness of child development; (2) challenges accessing health care; (3) responses to health information; (4) importance of aftercare; and (5) preference for service provision. Most (16) GP respondents reported they should not be responsible for post-surgical follow-up after grommet insertion. Lack of capacity and funding were identified as key barriers to GP-led follow-up. Discussion Families/whānau highly valued follow-up services and hearing evaluations after grommet insertion, and had a strong preference for clinicians with perceived expertise in ear and hearing care (ORLs and audiologists). They reported multiple barriers to receiving the desired care. Māori and Pacific families/whānau experienced additional delays for referrals into specialist services. GPs showed low support for primary care-led grommet follow-up care, with most not providing routine grommet checks after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara Mustafa, Claire Cannon, Rawiri Keenan, Martin Mikaere, Tammy Dehar, Suzanne Moorhouse, Janine Thompson, Lynne Chepulis
{"title":"<i>Corrigendum to:</i> Evaluating the impact of the Piki te Ora extended primary care team on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"Sara Mustafa, Claire Cannon, Rawiri Keenan, Martin Mikaere, Tammy Dehar, Suzanne Moorhouse, Janine Thompson, Lynne Chepulis","doi":"10.1071/HC24108_CO","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24108_CO","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Equitable access to primary health care: better availability of GP appointments is only one piece of the jigsaw.","authors":"Tim Stokes, Felicity Goodyear-Smith","doi":"10.1071/HC25047","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC25047","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Client-Led Integrated Care (CLIC) was implemented in general practices between 2018 and 2022 in the Southern region of New Zealand. It was envisaged to be an equitable, holistic and patient-centred inter-disciplinary framework of care for those with multiple long-term conditions; usually called multimorbidity. Aim This process evaluation aimed to determine whether CLIC supported self-management ability and assessed its alignment with current priorities for multimorbidity management. Method Mixed methods were used across four purposively selected general practices. At each practice interviews were undertaken together with participant observation over 3years. This was followed by analysis of annual self-report surveys. Results CLIC worked well for those patients who were engaged, but the implementation provided minimal consideration of the resources required for everyone to receive culturally competent integrated care. Staff reported structural difficulties and wondered if the right patients were targeted. Discussion CLIC did not address the needs of all participants, nor did it target those with the most ability to benefit. In all practices, despite increasing rates of multimorbidity and social complexity during a pandemic, the organisation of general practice and how it connected with the health system remained unchanged. Transitioning to a general practice system for complex multimorbidity will require changes in funding, strong leadership and clear communication. It requires all areas of the health system to provide an integrated health and social care system that is culturally competent and engages those most vulnerable in our community.
{"title":"Envisaging better care for patients with complex multimorbidity in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Anna Askerud","doi":"10.1071/HC24082","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Client-Led Integrated Care (CLIC) was implemented in general practices between 2018 and 2022 in the Southern region of New Zealand. It was envisaged to be an equitable, holistic and patient-centred inter-disciplinary framework of care for those with multiple long-term conditions; usually called multimorbidity. Aim This process evaluation aimed to determine whether CLIC supported self-management ability and assessed its alignment with current priorities for multimorbidity management. Method Mixed methods were used across four purposively selected general practices. At each practice interviews were undertaken together with participant observation over 3years. This was followed by analysis of annual self-report surveys. Results CLIC worked well for those patients who were engaged, but the implementation provided minimal consideration of the resources required for everyone to receive culturally competent integrated care. Staff reported structural difficulties and wondered if the right patients were targeted. Discussion CLIC did not address the needs of all participants, nor did it target those with the most ability to benefit. In all practices, despite increasing rates of multimorbidity and social complexity during a pandemic, the organisation of general practice and how it connected with the health system remained unchanged. Transitioning to a general practice system for complex multimorbidity will require changes in funding, strong leadership and clear communication. It requires all areas of the health system to provide an integrated health and social care system that is culturally competent and engages those most vulnerable in our community.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara Mustafa, Claire Cannon, Rawiri Keenan, Martin Mikaere, Tammy Dehar, Suzanne Moorhouse, Janine Thompson, Lynne Chepulis
Introduction Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a significant health issue in New Zealand with a disproportionate effect for Māori. To address inequities and optimise care, Te Korowai Hauora o Hauraki, an Iwi Māori health provider, established the 'Piki te Ora service' to support its five rural clinics by providing culturally safe, multidisciplinary support for patients with T2D. Aim This study aimed to undertake a service review, describing and evaluating the available clinical data, of the Piki te Ora service. Methods Patients enrolled in the Piki te Ora service between January 2021 and March 2024 were invited to have their data (sociodemographic, HbA1c, cholesterol and blood pressure) included in the review. Frequency and mode of health care/patient contact were also explored. Results A total of 112 patients were contacted and 64 (mean age 58years, 62.5% Māori) consented to data review. Over 6months, patients in the Piki te Ora service were contacted an average of 9.5 times, with phone calls being the predominant mode of contact. Median HbA1c levels significantly decreased by 16.0mmol/mol at 6months post enrolment in the Piki te Ora service (P =0.011) but no significant changes were observed in cholesterol or blood pressure. Discussion The Piki te Ora service appears to provide effective support for T2D management, particularly glycaemic control, however more clinical data is needed to evaluate its effectiveness. Its flexible and accessible approach, including free consultations, may enhance care accessibility, especially for economically deprived patients.
2型糖尿病(T2D)是新西兰的一个重要健康问题,对Māori的影响不成比例。为了解决不公平现象和优化护理,Iwi Māori卫生服务提供者Te Korowai Hauora o Hauraki建立了“Piki Te Ora服务”,通过为T2D患者提供文化上安全的多学科支持,支持其五个农村诊所。目的本研究旨在进行一项服务回顾,描述和评估Piki te Ora服务的现有临床数据。方法在2021年1月至2024年3月期间加入Piki te Ora服务的患者被邀请将他们的数据(社会人口统计学、HbA1c、胆固醇和血压)纳入综述。还探讨了保健/病人接触的频率和方式。结果共接触112例患者,64例(平均年龄58岁,62.5% Māori)同意资料审查。在6个月的时间里,Piki te Ora服务的患者平均被联系了9.5次,电话是主要的联系方式。在参加Piki te Ora服务6个月后,中位HbA1c水平显著降低了16.0mmol/mol (P =0.011),但胆固醇或血压没有显著变化。Piki te Ora服务似乎为T2D管理提供了有效的支持,特别是血糖控制,然而需要更多的临床数据来评估其有效性。其灵活和方便的方法,包括免费咨询,可能会提高护理的可及性,特别是对经济困难的患者。
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of the Piki te Ora extended primary care team on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"Sara Mustafa, Claire Cannon, Rawiri Keenan, Martin Mikaere, Tammy Dehar, Suzanne Moorhouse, Janine Thompson, Lynne Chepulis","doi":"10.1071/HC24108","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a significant health issue in New Zealand with a disproportionate effect for Māori. To address inequities and optimise care, Te Korowai Hauora o Hauraki, an Iwi Māori health provider, established the 'Piki te Ora service' to support its five rural clinics by providing culturally safe, multidisciplinary support for patients with T2D. Aim This study aimed to undertake a service review, describing and evaluating the available clinical data, of the Piki te Ora service. Methods Patients enrolled in the Piki te Ora service between January 2021 and March 2024 were invited to have their data (sociodemographic, HbA1c, cholesterol and blood pressure) included in the review. Frequency and mode of health care/patient contact were also explored. Results A total of 112 patients were contacted and 64 (mean age 58years, 62.5% Māori) consented to data review. Over 6months, patients in the Piki te Ora service were contacted an average of 9.5 times, with phone calls being the predominant mode of contact. Median HbA1c levels significantly decreased by 16.0mmol/mol at 6months post enrolment in the Piki te Ora service (P =0.011) but no significant changes were observed in cholesterol or blood pressure. Discussion The Piki te Ora service appears to provide effective support for T2D management, particularly glycaemic control, however more clinical data is needed to evaluate its effectiveness. Its flexible and accessible approach, including free consultations, may enhance care accessibility, especially for economically deprived patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction There is increasing concern about the wellbeing of tertiary students, and this is likely to be further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is minimal information about what support is being provided. In New Zealand, there is even less information available on Pacific students in the tertiary environment. Aim This study explored the role of one tertiary institution in the provision of support for Pacific tertiary students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Pacific students' perceptions of all the support they received from the University of Otago during the COVID-19 pandemic were obtained from a cross-sectional survey between April to June 2022. All Pacific students attending the University in 2022 were eligible to participate. An online survey was emailed to all students. Results There were 1277 Pacific students enrolled at the University in 2022. Of all eligible Pacific students, 358 (28%) completed the survey. Three quarters of students had to isolate since the start of the academic year, either because they had COVID-19, or they were a close contact of someone with the disease. Of all participants, 356 (99%) received a health pack. At least two-thirds (67.6%) had accessed other support from the University. A third (32.4%) accessed support through the Otago University Students' Association and some from the community and local Pacific health provider. The support was highly valued by students who utilised these services. Discussion Institutions can provide effective leadership in the coordination of support for their students through working together with student-led, government and non-governmental organisations in the community.
{"title":"Tertiary institution's duty of care for the health and well-being of Pacific students during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional survey.","authors":"Faafetai Sopoaga, Shyamala Nada-Raja, Malia Lameta","doi":"10.1071/HC24039","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction There is increasing concern about the wellbeing of tertiary students, and this is likely to be further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is minimal information about what support is being provided. In New Zealand, there is even less information available on Pacific students in the tertiary environment. Aim This study explored the role of one tertiary institution in the provision of support for Pacific tertiary students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Pacific students' perceptions of all the support they received from the University of Otago during the COVID-19 pandemic were obtained from a cross-sectional survey between April to June 2022. All Pacific students attending the University in 2022 were eligible to participate. An online survey was emailed to all students. Results There were 1277 Pacific students enrolled at the University in 2022. Of all eligible Pacific students, 358 (28%) completed the survey. Three quarters of students had to isolate since the start of the academic year, either because they had COVID-19, or they were a close contact of someone with the disease. Of all participants, 356 (99%) received a health pack. At least two-thirds (67.6%) had accessed other support from the University. A third (32.4%) accessed support through the Otago University Students' Association and some from the community and local Pacific health provider. The support was highly valued by students who utilised these services. Discussion Institutions can provide effective leadership in the coordination of support for their students through working together with student-led, government and non-governmental organisations in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143736006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Horny Goat Weed/Epimedium.","authors":"E Lyn Lee, Jo Barnes","doi":"10.1071/HC24183","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"96-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Clinical uncertainty is not uncommon; however, the current conception of the professional clinician has meant that discussion on uncertainty has focused on elimination rather than recognition. Uncertainty comes from an imbalance in knowledge, data, clinical experience, evidence-based guidelines, judgement, and decision-making. There is a strong argument for improving tolerance of clinical uncertainty, particularly in primary care where general practitioners might be especially vulnerable to uncertainty due to their exposure to undifferentiated illness. Aim This research aims to establish expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. Methods Two focus groups, consisting of three general practitioners and five expert patients, discussed uncertainty regarding restless legs syndrome. This topic was used as a rhetorical proxy to examine expert patient and general practitioner perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. The qualitative data were then analysed to form overarching thematic areas. Results Four overarching professional attributes were identified: collaboration, compassion, insight, and unconventional thinking. These are all attributes that lie within a clinician's skillset, but the evidence here suggests that they need to be foregrounded in practice. Discussion In attempting to assess professional clinical practice in relation to uncertainty, this research recommends that clinicians work to adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach, where they explicitly share uncertainties, focus on a patient's emotional state during the diagnostic phases of treatment, and see the merits of challenging themselves to look beyond routine algorithms.
{"title":"Expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty: a qualitative study.","authors":"Tania Ghosh, Erik Blair","doi":"10.1071/HC24055","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Clinical uncertainty is not uncommon; however, the current conception of the professional clinician has meant that discussion on uncertainty has focused on elimination rather than recognition. Uncertainty comes from an imbalance in knowledge, data, clinical experience, evidence-based guidelines, judgement, and decision-making. There is a strong argument for improving tolerance of clinical uncertainty, particularly in primary care where general practitioners might be especially vulnerable to uncertainty due to their exposure to undifferentiated illness. Aim This research aims to establish expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. Methods Two focus groups, consisting of three general practitioners and five expert patients, discussed uncertainty regarding restless legs syndrome. This topic was used as a rhetorical proxy to examine expert patient and general practitioner perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. The qualitative data were then analysed to form overarching thematic areas. Results Four overarching professional attributes were identified: collaboration, compassion, insight, and unconventional thinking. These are all attributes that lie within a clinician's skillset, but the evidence here suggests that they need to be foregrounded in practice. Discussion In attempting to assess professional clinical practice in relation to uncertainty, this research recommends that clinicians work to adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach, where they explicitly share uncertainties, focus on a patient's emotional state during the diagnostic phases of treatment, and see the merits of challenging themselves to look beyond routine algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Improving the respiratory health of Māori and Pacific children in Aotearoa, New Zealand is a priority. Respiratory studies over the past decade have continued to highlight the ongoing inequities among Māori and Pacific children. Aim This systematic review aimed to explore the characteristics of respiratory research with Māori and Pacific children (0-14 years) living in New Zealand. Research objectives were to evaluate the types of study designs used, summarise participant demographics including ethnicity and evaluate whether culturally relevant frameworks were incorporated. Methods Studies were located across four databases: Medline, EBSCOHost, Scopus and PubMed, from 2010 to 2022. To qualify, studies needed to include (1) Māori or (2) Pacific children aged (3) 0-14 years and (4) describe a respiratory research project conducted in New Zealand. A narrative synthesis of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria was performed. Results Of the 539 studies identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective cohort studies with respiratory conditions focused mainly on asthma, group A streptococcus and lower respiratory tract infections. Four studies were qualitative, and only 2 of the 29 studies reported using a Kaupapa Māori framework. Discussion Despite the increased attention to the respiratory health of Māori and Pacific children, there is a lack of research on the lived experiences of whānau and their children who endure these conditions. Few studies incorporated culturally relevant approaches. Further research that incorporates culturally responsive approaches is urgently needed to enhance ourunderstanding of Māori and Pacific child respiratory health and to advance health equity.
{"title":"Respiratory research with Māori and Pacific children living in Aotearoa, New Zealand: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Amio Matenga-Ikihele, Jacinta Fa'alili-Fidow, Dantzel Tiakia, Dudley Gentles, John Natua, Gemma Malungahu, Bernadette Tatafu, Rudy Roodhouse-Hill, Ruby Tuesday, Maria Ngawati, Mataroria Lyndon","doi":"10.1071/HC23066","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC23066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Improving the respiratory health of Māori and Pacific children in Aotearoa, New Zealand is a priority. Respiratory studies over the past decade have continued to highlight the ongoing inequities among Māori and Pacific children. Aim This systematic review aimed to explore the characteristics of respiratory research with Māori and Pacific children (0-14 years) living in New Zealand. Research objectives were to evaluate the types of study designs used, summarise participant demographics including ethnicity and evaluate whether culturally relevant frameworks were incorporated. Methods Studies were located across four databases: Medline, EBSCOHost, Scopus and PubMed, from 2010 to 2022. To qualify, studies needed to include (1) Māori or (2) Pacific children aged (3) 0-14 years and (4) describe a respiratory research project conducted in New Zealand. A narrative synthesis of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria was performed. Results Of the 539 studies identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective cohort studies with respiratory conditions focused mainly on asthma, group A streptococcus and lower respiratory tract infections. Four studies were qualitative, and only 2 of the 29 studies reported using a Kaupapa Māori framework. Discussion Despite the increased attention to the respiratory health of Māori and Pacific children, there is a lack of research on the lived experiences of whānau and their children who endure these conditions. Few studies incorporated culturally relevant approaches. Further research that incorporates culturally responsive approaches is urgently needed to enhance ourunderstanding of Māori and Pacific child respiratory health and to advance health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"63-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joanna Hikaka, Zhenqiang Wu, Michal Boyd, Martin J Connolly, Joanna B Broad, Cheryl Calvert, Annie Tatton, Kathy Peri, Katherine Bloomfield
Introduction Polypharmacy increases the risk of medicines-related harm, including falls, in older adults. Falls have a significant impact on quality of life and health system resources. Little is known about medicine use in retirement village (RV) residents in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). Aim Our study aimed to describe medicine use and the point prevalence of polypharmacy among a cohort of RV residents in Auckland, NZ. Methods Data collection occurred from July 2016 to June 2018. Eligible participants (those residing permanently in a RV) were recruited from RVs in Auckland, New Zealand. Medicines use data were collected using an interRAI assessment tool. Descriptive statistics, t -tests and Chi-squared tests were used for analysis. Results A total of 578 residents were recruited from 33 RVs and the median age was 81.6 years. Participants took a mean of 4.8 regular medicines (standard deviation = 2.9) and 0.7 'as required' medicines. Anti-hypertensives (68.5%), lipid-lowering medicines (45.2%), antacids (39.4%) and antiplatelet agents (37.9%) were the most prescribed medicine classes. Polypharmacy (five-plus medicines; 51.8%) was common and hyperpolypharmacy (10-plus medicines; 5.7%) occurred infrequently. Discussion This study provides insight into medicines use by RV residents in Auckland, NZ. Medicines used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease were used most commonly and polypharmacy was common. Active review of RV residents' medicines is warranted, based on these findings and increasing evidence regarding the use of medicines, including those for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Trial registration Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: CTRN12616000685415. Registered 25.5.2016. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U111-1173-6083.
{"title":"Medicines use and polypharmacy in retirement village residents in Aotearoa New Zealand: a point prevalence observational study.","authors":"Joanna Hikaka, Zhenqiang Wu, Michal Boyd, Martin J Connolly, Joanna B Broad, Cheryl Calvert, Annie Tatton, Kathy Peri, Katherine Bloomfield","doi":"10.1071/HC24038","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Polypharmacy increases the risk of medicines-related harm, including falls, in older adults. Falls have a significant impact on quality of life and health system resources. Little is known about medicine use in retirement village (RV) residents in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). Aim Our study aimed to describe medicine use and the point prevalence of polypharmacy among a cohort of RV residents in Auckland, NZ. Methods Data collection occurred from July 2016 to June 2018. Eligible participants (those residing permanently in a RV) were recruited from RVs in Auckland, New Zealand. Medicines use data were collected using an interRAI assessment tool. Descriptive statistics, t -tests and Chi-squared tests were used for analysis. Results A total of 578 residents were recruited from 33 RVs and the median age was 81.6 years. Participants took a mean of 4.8 regular medicines (standard deviation = 2.9) and 0.7 'as required' medicines. Anti-hypertensives (68.5%), lipid-lowering medicines (45.2%), antacids (39.4%) and antiplatelet agents (37.9%) were the most prescribed medicine classes. Polypharmacy (five-plus medicines; 51.8%) was common and hyperpolypharmacy (10-plus medicines; 5.7%) occurred infrequently. Discussion This study provides insight into medicines use by RV residents in Auckland, NZ. Medicines used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease were used most commonly and polypharmacy was common. Active review of RV residents' medicines is warranted, based on these findings and increasing evidence regarding the use of medicines, including those for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Trial registration Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: CTRN12616000685415. Registered 25.5.2016. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U111-1173-6083.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 4","pages":"407-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}