Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT最新文献

Background: The experience of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may shape attitudes towards salvage therapy. Furthermore, physician attitudes towards salvage therapy may differ based on specialty and experience. Our objective is to compare physician attitudes and patient experiences with SRS.

Methods: Eligible patients with brain metastases treated with one course of SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the definitive or postoperative setting at a single institution were surveyed from 11/2021 to 11/2022 regarding their perspectives on salvage therapy. A separate 11-question multi-disciplinary physician survey was distributed to residents, fellows and attendings at seven additional academic institutions in the US. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess differences.

Results: A total of 30 patients and 88 physicians were surveyed. Most patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with initial SRS/FSRT (90%). When given an option between WBRT or SRS for salvage treatment, all patients favored SRS. The physicians consisted of radiation oncologists (69.3%), neurosurgeons (19.3%), medical oncologists (8.0%), and neuro-oncologists (3.4%). Most physicians were confident or very confident in their ability to discuss the risks and benefits of SRS for brain metastases (78.9%), but this was significantly lower if the patient had received prior SRS (56.6%, P<.001). In these cases, there were significant differences in response by medical specialty and confidence level (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Patients and physicians view tumor control followed by long-term toxicity as the most important factors for salvage therapy after initial SRS for brain metastases.

Purpose: Despite the efficacy of endorectal balloon (ERB) in reducing rectal radiation dose, the effectiveness of upper rectal fixation remains to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ERB on upper rectal fixation in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.

Materials: Cine MRI was performed in 46 patients with localized prostate cancer to assess the stability of the anterior rectal wall with and without ERB by calculating the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the midgland or the seminal vesicle.

Results: The standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity for the anterior rectal wall decreased significantly with the use of ERB both at the level of the midgland (p < 0.05) and the seminal vesicle (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the anterior rectal wall at the level of the seminal vesicle was significantly higher than at the level of the midgland without ERB (p < 0.05). But with ERB, the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the seminal vesicle became comparable to that at the level of the midgland (p = 0.392).

Conclusion: The anterior rectal wall is stabilized by ERBs not only at the level of the midgland but also at the level of the seminal vesicle. ERBs can transform the rectum from a moving and deformable organ into a static and rigid organ.

Brain metastases during pregnancy poses complex conundrum in management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers valuable option to clinicians in this scenario. We reviewed and described the safety and effectiveness of Gamma Knife (GK) SRS in treating a solitary cerebellar metastasis in a patient with recurrent breast cancer at 28 weeks of gestation. Following multidisciplinary discussion, she consented for urgent single session GK SRS to the brain metastasis with 2 cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy prior to planned delivery at term. Prior to the frame-based treatment, a trial run with dosimeters placed on the superior and inferior parts of foam knee support showed radiation exposure of 3.12 mSv and 1.06 mSv respectively. A prescription dose of 16 Gy at the 50% isodose was delivered using 24 isocentres over 39.7' of beam on time. The treatment plan had 98% coverage, 89% selectivity and a gradient index of 2.98. Dosimeters placed near the uterine fundus and suprapubic region (consistent with location of fetal head) during the actual treatment recorded 2.83 mSv and 0.27 mSv, which is lower than the trial dosimeter readings. The patient successfully completed SRS treatment and gave birth to a healthy baby two months later. Follow-up MRI at three months interval showed total resolution of the lesion. GK SRS is known for the lowest extracranial dose compared to other SRS modalities. This report and literature review confirmed that GK is a sharp and effective, yet gentle and safe treatment for pregnant patients with brain metastases.

Purpose: To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.

Patients and methods: From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).

Results: All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.

Conclusion: Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

Purpose: To compare plan quality among photon volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Gamma Knife, and three different proton beam modalities.

Methods: Fifty-five brain lesions from 20 patients were planned with three different proton spot size ranges of cyclotron-generated proton beams, CPBs (spot size σ: 2.7-7.0 mm), linear accelerator proton beams, LPBs (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm), and linear accelerator proton minibeams, LPMBs (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm), with and without apertures and compared against photon VMAT and Gamma Knife plans. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton and photon plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose. All proton plans used ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty in robust evaluation to achieve V_100%Rx > 95% of the GTV. Apertures were applied to proton beams irradiating tumors <1 cm³ volume and located <2.5 cm depth. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V_{12 Gy}, V_{4.5 Gy}, and mean brain dose were compared across all plan types. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between photon and proton plans.

Results: When compared to CPB generated plans, average CI and GI were significantly better for the LPB and LPMB plans. Aperture-based IMPT plans showed improvement from Gamma Knife for all dosimetric metrics. Aperture-based IMPT plans also showed improvement in all dosimetric metrics for shallow tumors (d < 2.5 cm) when compared with non-aperture-based plans.

Conclusion: The LPB and LPMB stand as excellent alternatives to CPB or photon therapy and significantly increase the preservation of normal tissue.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer variation in contouring vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the organs-at-risk (OAR), and its dosimetric impact in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Three VS typical cases were contoured by four clinicians. The Agreement Volume Index (AVI) appeared to be notably higher in VS than in OARs, such that the dose coverage of VS is fairly robust. In OARs, the largest variation was +1.02Gy in dmax for the brainstem, +0.78Gy in dmean for the cochlea and +1.05Gy in dmax of the trigeminal nerve. Accordingly, it was decided that all VS delineations for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and all frame-based SRS contouring in general, should always be reviewed by a second physician. In addition, the retrospective presentation of VS cases at daily peer review meetings has also been adopted to ensure that the consensus is constantly updated, as well as for training purposes.

Purpose: Precision targeting is crucial to successful stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). We investigated the impact of intra-fractional 6-dimensional corrections during frameless image-guided radiosurgery (IGRS) for pain outcome in TGN patients.

Materials and methods: A total of 41 sets of intra-fractional corrections from 35 patients with TGN treated by frameless IGRS from 2009 to 2013 were retrospectively studied. For each IGRS, the intra-fractional 6-dimensional shifts were conducted at 6 couch angles. Clinical pain outcome was recorded according the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) 5-points score. The relationship in 6-dimensional corrections and absolute translational distances between patients with pain relief score points <2 versus ≥2 were analyzed.

Results: The absolute mean lateral, longitudinal, and vertical translational shifts were 0.46 ± 0.15 mm, 0.36 ± 0.16 mm and 0.21 ± 0.08 mm, respectively, with 97% of translational shifts being within 0.7 mm. The absolute mean lateral (pitch), longitudinal (roll), and vertical (yaw) rotational corrections are 0.33 ± 0.24°, 0.18 ± 0.09°, and 0.27 ± 0.15°, respectively, with 97% of rotational corrections being within 0.6°. The median follow-up duration for pain outcome was 26 months after IGRS. The average calculated absolute shift for patients with pain relief <2 and ≥2 BNI points, were 0.228 ± 0.008 mm and 0.259 ± 0.007 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the translational shifts, rotational corrections or absolute distances between these two patient groups.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate high spatial targeting accuracy of frameless IGRS for TGN with only nominal intra-fraction 6-dimensional corrections.