Journal of refractive surgery最新文献

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new aspheric ablation profile for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter study included patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a new aspheric ablation profile of the Technolas Teneo 317 (Model 2) excimer laser (version 1.28 US SW) by Technolas Perfect Vision, Bausch+Lomb, Inc. No nomogram adjustments were made, and the patient's manifest refraction was entered into the laser (for treatment). Postoperative assessments included visual and refractive outcomes. Patients were asked to complete the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: A total of 333 eyes from 168 patients with a mean age of 33 ± 7 years were included. At postoperative 9 months, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities of 20/25 or better were seen in 97.8% and 100% of eyes, respectively. None of the eyes lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The mean manifest spherical refraction improved from -5.67 ± 2.52 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.04 ± 0.32 D postoperatively, with 92.7% of eyes achieving residual refractive error within ±0.50 D. Residual refractive cylinder within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D was seen in 93% and 99.4% eyes, respectively. The refractive outcomes were stable throughout the follow-up of 9 months. The proportion of patients satisfied with their vision rose from 27.7% preoperatively to 98.1% postoperatively.

Conclusions: LASIK performed using a new aspheric ablation profile of the Technolas Teneo 317 (Model 2) excimer laser is safe and effective for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism, yielding excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were stable over 9 months. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e544-e553.].

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL) implantation versus the four-flanged scleral fixation technique in eyes with loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in whom an IOL was implanted either during or after short-term aphakia due to loss of capsular and sulcus support in a routine cataract surgery with at least 6 months of follow-up time between 2015 and 2023 in a tertiary medical center in Israel. Two different IOL implantation techniques were compared: the implantation of an angle-supported ACIOL and four-flanged scleral fixation. Main outcome measures included postoperative complications such as pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, loss of intraocular pressure control and glaucoma, IOL subluxation, and retinal detachment.

Results: Sixty-five eyes of 65 patients were included in the study, 33 eyes in the AC-IOL group and 32 eyes in the flange group. Follow-up time was 29.92 ± 20.02 months in the AC-IOL group and 20.17 ± 15.56 months in the flange group (P = .087). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was observed in 10 (30.3%) patients in the AC-IOL group and in 1 (3.1%) patient in the flange group (P = .04). This association remained significant using survival analysis (P = .006). In 4 (12.1%) patients in the AC-IOL group, a glaucoma filtering procedure was performed to control the intraocular pressure compared with none in the flange group (P = .042).

Conclusions: In the setting of loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery, four-flanged scleral fixation showed an overall lower rate of complications and significantly reduced rate of subsequent surgical interventions. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e520-e526.].

Purpose: To compare the prediction accuracy of the Barrett toric calculator using standard or integrated keratometry (IK) mode in combination with predicted or measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) in a group of patients with cataract implanted with non-toric IOLs.

Methods: In this retrospective clinical cohort study, the medical records of patients with age-related cataract who underwent phacoemulsification with the implantation of an aspheric monofocal IOL were reviewed. Four methods, including standard keratometry with predicted PCA (PPCA), IK combined with predicted PCA (IK-PPCA), and IK combined with measured PCA derived from IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) or CASIA2 (Tomey) (IK-MMPCA or IK-CMPCA), were applied to the Barrett toric calculator to calculate the predicted residual astigmatism. The mean absolute prediction error (MAPE), centroid of the prediction error, and proportion of eyes within the prediction error of ±0.50, ±0.75, and ±1.00 diopters (D) were all ciphered out from the four methods, respectively.

Results: Data from 129 eyes of 129 patients were included in this study. The MAPE of the IK-PPCA method (0.57 ± 0.36 D) was significantly smaller than that of the PPCA (0.62 ± 0.38 D) and IK-CMPCA (0.63 ± 0.46 D) methods (P = .048 and .014, respectively). There were no significant differences in the centroid vectors of prediction errors and predictability rates among the four methods (all P > .05).

Conclusions: In the current version of the Barrett toric calculator, the predictive accuracy of the IK mode incorporating PPCA was slightly superior to using the standard keratometry mode or incorporating MPCA. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e453-e459.].

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and stability of a modified PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision protocol (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) for correcting hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia, using Custom Refractive Software Master (CRSM) targeting over a 6-month period.

Methods: A total of 636 eyes of 318 patients with a mean age of 51.05 ± 4.71 years (range: 40 to 60 years) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients completed a 6-month follow-up. CRSM software was used to generate ablation profiles for the MEL90 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). The target refraction was emmetropic for the dominant eyes and between -0.75 and -1.12 diopters (D) for the near eyes.

Results: Visual and refractive results were studied separately by the dominant and non-dominant eyes. The mean attempt to correct for spherical equivalent refraction was +2.17 ± 1.16 D (range: -1.00 to +5.37 D). The mean attempted cylinder was -0.60 ± 0.75 D (range: -4.00 to 0.00 D). All eyes monocularly achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/25 or better after refractive treatment and 88% achieved 20/20. Binocularly all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/25 or better and 96.54% achieved 20/20. Ninety-eight percent of the patients maintained their corrected distance visual acuity before surgery and UDVA 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions: This hyperopic micro-anisometropia protocol with PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated refractive treatment. It was an effective procedure with excellent results for UDVA and uncorrected near visual acuity and demonstrates that binocular summation exists. [ J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e480-e489.].

Purpose: To assess the influence of ocular biometric parameters on intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration after cataract surgery.

Methods: Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were screened for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Tilt and decentration of the crystalline lens and IOL were measured using the CASIA2 (Tomey). Anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were preoperatively measured by the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of ocular biometric parameters on IOL tilt and decentration after cataract surgery.

Results: In total, 191 eyes of 120 patients were included. Age was positively correlated with IOL tilt, whereas ACD and AL were negatively correlated with IOL tilt. A strong positive correlation was found between preoperative crystalline lenses and postoperative IOLs in tilt magnitude (r = 0.769, P < .001) and tilt direction (r = 0.688, P < .001). A positive correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative lens decentration magnitude and decentration direction. Greater postoperative IOL tilt and decentration were significantly associated with greater preoperative crystalline lens tilt (P < .001) and decentration (P = .027).

Conclusions: IOL tilt was greater in older patients. Shorter AL and shallower ACD contributed to greater IOL tilt. The tilt and decentration of the IOL will be greater in patients with greater tilt and decentration of the crystalline lens. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e438-e444.].

Purpose: To assess the effects of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt, as well as age, on postoperative visual function (corrected distance visual acuity [CDVA] and contrast sensitivity) by comparing an extended depth-of-focus IOL using higher order aspheric optics against a monofocal IOL from the same platform.

Methods: This retrospective observational study targeted patients without other eye diseases who underwent surgery to implant the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue or the monofocal IOL Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece (J&J Vision) during cataract surgery from November 2021 to December 2022. The effects of age, axial length, IOL decentration, tilt, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) on the postoperative 5 m CDVA and area under log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) under photopic and scotopic conditions were evaluated within 3 months of surgery.

Results: No significant difference was found in postoperative CDVA between the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group (n = 61 eyes) and the Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece group (n = 35 eyes), but AULCSF was significantly better in the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group for photopic (1.58 ± 0.13 vs 1.46 ± 0.18; P = .002) and scotopic (1.71 ± 0.11 vs 1.59 ± 0.19; P = .002) eyes. Multivariate analysis showed a negative correlation between AULCSF and IOL decentration and age in the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group (P < .01), with no significant correlation with tilt, axial length, and corneal HOAs.

Conclusions: The Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue yielded significantly better contrast sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions than the Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece. However, it is important to consider the effects of IOL decentration and age when evaluating the contrast sensitivity of the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e499-e505.].

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes, rotational stability, and footplate position of the toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) (STAAR Surgical) in eyes with low vault and analyze factors related to rotational stability.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 59 eyes of 59 patients with insufficient vault (< 250 µm). Postoperative rotation was defined as the difference between the achieved angle and the intraoperative fixation angle, and assessed with a digital anterior segment photograph after full mydriasis at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was used to determine the ciliary body morphology and position of the footplate. Correlation analysis was employed to identify the risk factors associated with TICL rotation at 6 months postoperatively.

Results: At 6 months postoperatively, the mean central vault was 137.4 ± 61.0 µm (range: 40 to 236 µm), and the mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.04 and 1.15, respectively. The mean manifest refractive astigmatism decreased from -1.67 ± 0.82 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.43 ± 0.33 D postoperatively, and the mean absolute rotation was 4.50 ± 3.08 degrees (range: 0 to 12.50 degrees). The angle of rotation was correlated with the preoperative spherical power (r = -0.318, P = .014), the average value of TICL footplates position (r = 0.284, P = .029), and postoperative astigmatism (r = -.469, P⩽ .001).

Conclusions: TICL implantation is predictable, safe, and effective in correcting myopic astigmatism in eyes with low vault. The rotational stability was acceptable and related to the malposition of the footplate and preoperative spherical power. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e460-e467.].