首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Surgical Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to "Liver Resection With Extrahepatic Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of Thoughtful Selection". 更正“肝外疾病肝切除:基于人群的深思熟虑选择分析”。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70183
{"title":"Correction to \"Liver Resection With Extrahepatic Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of Thoughtful Selection\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jso.70183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146064415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous Resection Is Associated With Long-Term Survival in Patients With High-Risk Synchronous Rectal Cancer Liver Metastases. 同时切除与高风险同步性直肠癌肝转移患者的长期生存相关。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70175
Kevin P Labadie, Peter Vien, Kelly M Mahuron, Kristofor A Olson, Paul Wong, Darrell Fan, Elizabeth Meshkin, Kurt A Melstrom, Aaron G Lewis, Yasmin A Zerhouni, Bradford J Kim, Mark H Hanna, Lily L Lai, Andreas M Kaiser, Yuman Fong, Laleh G Melstrom

Background and objectives: Simultaneous rectal and hepatic resection for metastatic rectal cancer is less commonly performed due to concerns about safety, and the oncological outcomes are less well described. The objective of this study is to examine peri-operative and oncological outcomes for patients with rectal cancer liver metastases (RCLM) after simultaneous resection.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent curative-intent, simultaneous total mesorectal excision (TME) and hepatectomy for RCLM (January 2011 to May 2024). Post-operative safety and oncological outcomes were examined.

Results: 92 patients were analyzed, with the majority having high burden of hepatic metastases. No deaths occurred. 14 patients (15%) had > Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 complication, drainage of perihepatic fluid in eight patients (9%), and an anastomotic dehiscence in three patients (3%). Median follow up was 51 mo, and median OS was 70 mo, RFS was 10 mo, and H-RFS was 17 mo. Positive hepatic margin was associated with decreased OS, while a high Clinical Risk Score, a high Tumor Burden Score, and > 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with decreased RFS and H-RFS.

Conclusion: Simultaneous resection of RCLM was associated with peri-operative safety and long term survival in patients with high-risk disease, and can be reasonably offered in appropriate setting.

背景和目的:由于对安全性的考虑,转移性直肠癌的同时进行直肠和肝脏切除术的情况较少,而且肿瘤预后也没有得到很好的描述。本研究的目的是研究直肠癌肝转移(RCLM)患者同时切除后的围手术期和肿瘤预后。方法:单中心回顾性分析2011年1月至2024年5月期间因RCLM同时行全肠系膜切除(TME)和肝切除术的患者。检查术后安全性和肿瘤预后。结果:本组92例患者中,大部分患者肝转移负担较高。没有人员死亡。14例(15%)患者出现> Clavien-Dindo 3级并发症,8例(9%)患者出现肝周液引流,3例(3%)患者出现吻合口破裂。中位随访时间为51个月,中位OS为70个月,RFS为10个月,H-RFS为17个月。肝缘阳性与OS降低相关,而高临床风险评分(Clinical Risk Score)、高肿瘤负荷评分(Tumor Burden Score)和bbb60个新辅助化疗周期与RFS和H-RFS降低相关。结论:同时切除RCLM与高危患者围手术期安全和长期生存相关,可在适当的环境下合理提供。
{"title":"Simultaneous Resection Is Associated With Long-Term Survival in Patients With High-Risk Synchronous Rectal Cancer Liver Metastases.","authors":"Kevin P Labadie, Peter Vien, Kelly M Mahuron, Kristofor A Olson, Paul Wong, Darrell Fan, Elizabeth Meshkin, Kurt A Melstrom, Aaron G Lewis, Yasmin A Zerhouni, Bradford J Kim, Mark H Hanna, Lily L Lai, Andreas M Kaiser, Yuman Fong, Laleh G Melstrom","doi":"10.1002/jso.70175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Simultaneous rectal and hepatic resection for metastatic rectal cancer is less commonly performed due to concerns about safety, and the oncological outcomes are less well described. The objective of this study is to examine peri-operative and oncological outcomes for patients with rectal cancer liver metastases (RCLM) after simultaneous resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent curative-intent, simultaneous total mesorectal excision (TME) and hepatectomy for RCLM (January 2011 to May 2024). Post-operative safety and oncological outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 patients were analyzed, with the majority having high burden of hepatic metastases. No deaths occurred. 14 patients (15%) had > Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 complication, drainage of perihepatic fluid in eight patients (9%), and an anastomotic dehiscence in three patients (3%). Median follow up was 51 mo, and median OS was 70 mo, RFS was 10 mo, and H-RFS was 17 mo. Positive hepatic margin was associated with decreased OS, while a high Clinical Risk Score, a high Tumor Burden Score, and > 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with decreased RFS and H-RFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simultaneous resection of RCLM was associated with peri-operative safety and long term survival in patients with high-risk disease, and can be reasonably offered in appropriate setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146064356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Original Study: Risk Factors for Early Recurrence in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancers Who Underwent Curative Resection: An Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of JCOG1202. 原始研究:行根治性胆道癌切除术患者早期复发的危险因素:JCOG1202探索性亚组分析
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70135
Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Kohei Nakachi, Masafumi Ikeda, Masaru Konishi, Gakuto Ogawa, Yusuke Sano, Tatsuya Nomura, Hiroo Yanagibashi, Kazuto Shibuya, Hirofumi Shirakawa, Amane Takahashi, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Isamu Makino, Etsuro Hatano, Naoto Gotohda, Keiko Kamei, Satoshi Kobayashi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masato Ozaka, Takeshi Terashima, Takuji Okusaka, Junji Furuse, Makoto Ueno

Background and objectives: Postoperative early recurrence (ER) of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) leads to significant medical, psychological, social, and economic disadvantages for patients. Approximately 30% of patients with curatively resected BTCs experience recurrence within the first 12 months after the surgery. JCOG1202 randomized phase III trial demonstrated the survival benefit of adjuvant S-1 in patients with resected BTCs. The objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the risk factors for ER in patients with resected BTCs in the JCOG1202 cohort.

Methods: Of the 440 patients enrolled in JCOG1202, 217 who underwent observation and 207 who received adjuvant S-1 were eligible in this analysis. ER was defined as recurrence or death within 12 months after enrollment.

Results: ER was observed in 59 and 38 patients in observation and adjuvant S-1, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified CA19-9 levels > 37 U/ml (odds ratio (OR): 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26-6.17), poorly differentiation (vs. well-differentiated/papillary) (OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 1.93-11.69), moderate differentiation (vs. well-differentiated/papillary) (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.07-3.57), lymph node metastases ≥ 4 (vs. 0) (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.67-9.51), lymph node metastases 1-3 (vs. 0) (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.47-4.81), and R1 resection (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.07-4.41) as independent risk factors for ER. Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy significantly reduced ER (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83).

Conclusions: Postoperative CA19-9 levels, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastases, residual tumors, and adjuvant S-1 significantly affected ER in patients with curatively resected BTCs. Patients at high ER risk may require more intensive adjuvant therapy.

Trial registration: UMIN000011688.

背景与目的:胆道肿瘤(btc)术后早期复发(ER)给患者带来了显著的医疗、心理、社会和经济方面的不利影响。大约30%的治疗性切除btc患者在手术后的前12个月内复发。JCOG1202随机III期试验表明,佐剂S-1在切除btc患者中的生存获益。本探索性研究的目的是调查JCOG1202队列中切除btc患者发生ER的危险因素。方法:在JCOG1202纳入的440例患者中,217例接受了观察,207例接受了S-1辅助治疗。ER定义为入组后12个月内的复发或死亡。结果:观察组59例出现ER,辅助S-1组38例出现ER。多变量logistic回归分析确定CA19-9水平为bb0 37u /ml(优势比(OR): 2.79, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.26-6.17),低分化(与分化良好/乳头状相比)(OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 1.93-11.69),中度分化(与分化良好/乳头状相比)(OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.07-3.57),淋巴结转移≥4 (vs. 0) (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.67-9.51),淋巴结转移1-3 (vs. 0) (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.47-4.81), R1切除(OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.17)。1.07-4.41)为ER的独立危险因素。辅助S-1化疗显著降低ER (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83)。结论:术后CA19-9水平、肿瘤分化、淋巴结转移、残留肿瘤及辅助剂S-1对治疗切除btc患者ER有显著影响。ER高危患者可能需要更强化的辅助治疗。试验注册号:UMIN000011688。
{"title":"Original Study: Risk Factors for Early Recurrence in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancers Who Underwent Curative Resection: An Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of JCOG1202.","authors":"Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Kohei Nakachi, Masafumi Ikeda, Masaru Konishi, Gakuto Ogawa, Yusuke Sano, Tatsuya Nomura, Hiroo Yanagibashi, Kazuto Shibuya, Hirofumi Shirakawa, Amane Takahashi, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Isamu Makino, Etsuro Hatano, Naoto Gotohda, Keiko Kamei, Satoshi Kobayashi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masato Ozaka, Takeshi Terashima, Takuji Okusaka, Junji Furuse, Makoto Ueno","doi":"10.1002/jso.70135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Postoperative early recurrence (ER) of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) leads to significant medical, psychological, social, and economic disadvantages for patients. Approximately 30% of patients with curatively resected BTCs experience recurrence within the first 12 months after the surgery. JCOG1202 randomized phase III trial demonstrated the survival benefit of adjuvant S-1 in patients with resected BTCs. The objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the risk factors for ER in patients with resected BTCs in the JCOG1202 cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 440 patients enrolled in JCOG1202, 217 who underwent observation and 207 who received adjuvant S-1 were eligible in this analysis. ER was defined as recurrence or death within 12 months after enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER was observed in 59 and 38 patients in observation and adjuvant S-1, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified CA19-9 levels > 37 U/ml (odds ratio (OR): 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26-6.17), poorly differentiation (vs. well-differentiated/papillary) (OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 1.93-11.69), moderate differentiation (vs. well-differentiated/papillary) (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.07-3.57), lymph node metastases ≥ 4 (vs. 0) (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.67-9.51), lymph node metastases 1-3 (vs. 0) (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.47-4.81), and R1 resection (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.07-4.41) as independent risk factors for ER. Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy significantly reduced ER (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative CA19-9 levels, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastases, residual tumors, and adjuvant S-1 significantly affected ER in patients with curatively resected BTCs. Patients at high ER risk may require more intensive adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN000011688.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence Models Integrating Preoperative Prostate MRI and Clinical Parameters for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 人工智能模型整合术前前列腺MRI和临床参数预测前列腺外展:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70167
Xingguo Wu, Weigen Yao

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that analyze preoperative prostate MRI images in conjunction with clinical parameters for predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to July 2025 identified 14 eligible studies involving 2,131 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that integrated radiomics-clinical models achieved high diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 19.82 (95% CI: 12.33-31.86), indicating robust discrimination between EPE-positive and EPE-negative cases. Subgroup analysis suggested models using deep learning algorithms had marginally higher accuracy (DOR: 24.6) than those using traditional machine learning (DOR: 17.3), though the difference was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity among studies stemmed from variations in MRI protocols, segmentation methods, and modeling approaches. No significant publication bias was detected. The results affirm that integrating radiomic features from multiparametric MRI (e.g., T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging) with clinical variables (e.g., PSA, Gleason score) significantly outperforms conventional assessments for preoperative EPE prediction, demonstrating excellent diagnostic accuracy and supporting its potential clinical application in risk stratification. This supports the potential of combined models to enhance risk stratification and guide personalized surgical planning. Future research should prioritize standardized radiomics workflows, external validation, and multi-center collaborations to facilitate clinical adoption.

本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了人工智能(AI)模型的诊断性能,该模型分析术前前列腺MRI图像并结合临床参数预测前列腺癌的前列腺外展(EPE)。到2025年7月,PubMed, Embase和Web of Science的综合搜索确定了14项符合条件的研究,涉及2131名患者。合并分析表明,放射组学-临床综合模型具有较高的诊断效能,敏感性为0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87),特异性为0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92)。诊断优势比(DOR)为19.82 (95% CI: 12.33-31.86),表明epe阳性和epe阴性病例之间存在明显区别。亚组分析表明,使用深度学习算法的模型的准确率(DOR: 24.6)略高于使用传统机器学习的模型(DOR: 17.3),尽管差异没有统计学意义。研究之间的异质性源于MRI协议、分割方法和建模方法的差异。未发现显著的发表偏倚。结果证实,将多参数MRI的放射学特征(如t2加权、弥散加权成像)与临床变量(如PSA、Gleason评分)相结合,在术前预测EPE方面明显优于常规评估,显示出出色的诊断准确性,并支持其在风险分层中的潜在临床应用。这支持了联合模型增强风险分层和指导个性化手术计划的潜力。未来的研究应优先考虑标准化的放射组学工作流程、外部验证和多中心合作,以促进临床应用。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Models Integrating Preoperative Prostate MRI and Clinical Parameters for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xingguo Wu, Weigen Yao","doi":"10.1002/jso.70167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that analyze preoperative prostate MRI images in conjunction with clinical parameters for predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to July 2025 identified 14 eligible studies involving 2,131 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that integrated radiomics-clinical models achieved high diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 19.82 (95% CI: 12.33-31.86), indicating robust discrimination between EPE-positive and EPE-negative cases. Subgroup analysis suggested models using deep learning algorithms had marginally higher accuracy (DOR: 24.6) than those using traditional machine learning (DOR: 17.3), though the difference was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity among studies stemmed from variations in MRI protocols, segmentation methods, and modeling approaches. No significant publication bias was detected. The results affirm that integrating radiomic features from multiparametric MRI (e.g., T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging) with clinical variables (e.g., PSA, Gleason score) significantly outperforms conventional assessments for preoperative EPE prediction, demonstrating excellent diagnostic accuracy and supporting its potential clinical application in risk stratification. This supports the potential of combined models to enhance risk stratification and guide personalized surgical planning. Future research should prioritize standardized radiomics workflows, external validation, and multi-center collaborations to facilitate clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy as a First-Line Treatment in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 肝动脉输注化疗作为不可切除胆管癌的一线治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70196
Noah Brown, Abigail J Alexander, Rashid M Muhammed, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Courtney Scaife, Marshall Baker

Introduction: Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been used in efforts to improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Reported experiences are generally small institutional series. The efficacy of HAIC in locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma is not well defined.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials. Gov, and WHO Clinical Trials from inception to August 2024.

Results: A total of 202 publications were screened, with 15 studies representing 588 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Most patients demonstrated either a partial response or stable disease after therapy (CR: 2.5%, PR: 38.1%, SD: 43.4%, PD: 12.7%, NA: 3.3%). Meta-analysis found a pooled median overall survival of 18.3 months (95% CI: 14.1-22.4 months) and progression-free survival of 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-12.3 months).

Conclusion: HAIC demonstrates an improvement over reported survival for systemic chemotherapy alone when used as either an adjunct or in place of systemic therapy for first-line treatment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)已被用于改善局部晚期胆管癌患者的预后。报告的经验通常是小型的机构系列。HAIC治疗局部晚期胆管癌的疗效尚不明确。方法:我们使用PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、ClinicalTrials等电子数据库进行了全面的检索。Gov和世卫组织临床试验从开始到2024年8月。结果:共筛选202篇出版物,其中15篇研究,588例患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者在治疗后表现出部分缓解或病情稳定(CR: 2.5%, PR: 38.1%, SD: 43.4%, PD: 12.7%, NA: 3.3%)。荟萃分析发现,中位总生存期为18.3个月(95% CI: 14.1-22.4个月),无进展生存期为10.0个月(95% CI: 7.7-12.3个月)。结论:在胆管癌患者的一线治疗中,HAIC作为辅助治疗或代替全身治疗时,比单独全身化疗的生存率有改善。
{"title":"Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy as a First-Line Treatment in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Noah Brown, Abigail J Alexander, Rashid M Muhammed, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Courtney Scaife, Marshall Baker","doi":"10.1002/jso.70196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been used in efforts to improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Reported experiences are generally small institutional series. The efficacy of HAIC in locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive search using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials. Gov, and WHO Clinical Trials from inception to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 202 publications were screened, with 15 studies representing 588 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Most patients demonstrated either a partial response or stable disease after therapy (CR: 2.5%, PR: 38.1%, SD: 43.4%, PD: 12.7%, NA: 3.3%). Meta-analysis found a pooled median overall survival of 18.3 months (95% CI: 14.1-22.4 months) and progression-free survival of 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-12.3 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HAIC demonstrates an improvement over reported survival for systemic chemotherapy alone when used as either an adjunct or in place of systemic therapy for first-line treatment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Recurrence Rates of Osteoid Osteoma Treated With Open Surgery and Radiofrequency Ablation. 开放性手术和射频消融治疗骨样骨瘤的高复发率。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70198
Annika Y Myers, Adrian Lin, Abigail N Padilla, Brandon S Gettleman, Kian Jeshion-Nelson, Shourya Kumar, Tishya A L Wren, Bruce R Pawel, Vernon T Tolo, Alexander B Christ

Background and objectives: Osteoid Osteoma (OO) is a painful, benign bone tumor that can be treated surgically with en bloc resection, curettage, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study aims to measure recurrence rates after initial treatment by treatment type and to examine clinical factors associated with recurrence.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients with an OO diagnosis was performed using a pathology database from a tertiary pediatric hospital between November 1, 2004 and July 1, 2024. Statistical analysis examined the relationships among surgical technique, recurrence, and clinical variables.

Results: 24 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 1.41 years (interquartile range, IQR 2.0) and a median age at treatment of 9.92 years (IQR 5.8-13.5). Twelve patients (50.0%) experienced symptomatic tumor recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 0.92 years (IQR 0.1-3.0). Of those with tumor recurrence, five patients were initially treated with excision and curettage, while the remaining nine underwent RFA. There was no significant correlation between recurrence and surgical intervention (p = 0.667), age at initial surgery (p = 0.468), or patient sex (p = 0.667).

Conclusions: Surgical management of pediatric OO is linked to high recurrence rates, and recurrence is not related to surgical intervention, age, or patient sex.

背景和目的:骨样骨瘤(OO)是一种疼痛的、良性的骨肿瘤,可以通过手术切除、刮除和射频消融(RFA)来治疗。本研究的目的是测量初始治疗后的复发率,并探讨与复发相关的临床因素。方法:回顾性分析2004年11月1日至2024年7月1日某三级儿科医院病理数据库中诊断为OO的患者。统计分析了手术技术、复发率和临床变量之间的关系。结果:24例患者符合纳入标准,中位随访时间为1.41年(四分位间距,IQR 2.0),治疗时中位年龄为9.92岁(IQR 5.8-13.5)。12例(50.0%)出现有症状的肿瘤复发,中位复发时间为0.92年(IQR为0.1 ~ 3.0)。在肿瘤复发的患者中,5例患者最初接受切除和刮除治疗,其余9例接受RFA治疗。复发率与手术干预(p = 0.667)、初始手术年龄(p = 0.468)、患者性别(p = 0.667)无显著相关性。结论:小儿OO的手术处理与高复发率有关,且复发率与手术干预、年龄或患者性别无关。
{"title":"High Recurrence Rates of Osteoid Osteoma Treated With Open Surgery and Radiofrequency Ablation.","authors":"Annika Y Myers, Adrian Lin, Abigail N Padilla, Brandon S Gettleman, Kian Jeshion-Nelson, Shourya Kumar, Tishya A L Wren, Bruce R Pawel, Vernon T Tolo, Alexander B Christ","doi":"10.1002/jso.70198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Osteoid Osteoma (OO) is a painful, benign bone tumor that can be treated surgically with en bloc resection, curettage, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study aims to measure recurrence rates after initial treatment by treatment type and to examine clinical factors associated with recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients with an OO diagnosis was performed using a pathology database from a tertiary pediatric hospital between November 1, 2004 and July 1, 2024. Statistical analysis examined the relationships among surgical technique, recurrence, and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 1.41 years (interquartile range, IQR 2.0) and a median age at treatment of 9.92 years (IQR 5.8-13.5). Twelve patients (50.0%) experienced symptomatic tumor recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 0.92 years (IQR 0.1-3.0). Of those with tumor recurrence, five patients were initially treated with excision and curettage, while the remaining nine underwent RFA. There was no significant correlation between recurrence and surgical intervention (p = 0.667), age at initial surgery (p = 0.468), or patient sex (p = 0.667).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical management of pediatric OO is linked to high recurrence rates, and recurrence is not related to surgical intervention, age, or patient sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146018785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radical Resection Compared to Local Excision for Very Old Patients With Stage 1 Rectal Cancer: An Exact-Match Analysis of the SEER Database. 高龄1期直肠癌患者根治性切除与局部切除的比较:SEER数据库的精确匹配分析
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70197
Rachel Gefen, Sameh Hany Emile, Zoe Garoufalia, Justin Dourado, Nir Horesh, Steven D Wexner

Background: We assessed overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific-survival (CSS) of radical resection compared to local excision for stage 1 rectal cancer in very old patients (≥ 80 years).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent surgery for stage 1 rectal cancer from the SEER database from 2000-2020. Patients were divided into radical resection and local excision groups, and were exact matched for T stage, tumor grade, and tumor size. The main outcome measures were OS and CSS.

Results: 6379 patients ≥ 80 years underwent local or radical resection of stage 1 rectal cancer; 51.9% were female and 47% had T1 tumors. After matching, 1125 patients were included in each group. The median OS was longer in patients who underwent radical resection (60 months vs. 51 months, p = 0.009), yet there were no significant differences in CSS between the two groups. When stratified by the T stage, there was no benefit for radical resection in T1 tumors (p = 0.33). In multivariate analysis, radical resection and local excision had similar hazard of mortality (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.76-1.38).

Conclusion: Radical resection and local excision had similar CSS in very old patients with stage 1 rectal cancer. A personalized approach considering patient status and treatment goals should be used for each patient.

背景:我们评估了高龄(≥80岁)1期直肠癌患者根治性切除与局部切除的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2000-2020年SEER数据库中年龄≥80岁的1期直肠癌手术患者。患者分为根治性切除组和局部切除组,根据T分期、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小进行精确匹配。主要结局指标为OS和CSS。结果:6379例≥80岁的患者行1期直肠癌局部或根治性切除术;51.9%为女性,47%为T1肿瘤。配对后,每组纳入1125例患者。根治性切除术患者的中位生存期更长(60个月vs 51个月,p = 0.009),但两组间的CSS无显著差异。当按T期分层时,T1期肿瘤根治性切除没有获益(p = 0.33)。在多因素分析中,根治性切除和局部切除的死亡率相似(HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.76-1.38)。结论:高龄1期直肠癌根治性切除与局部切除的CSS相似。应针对每位患者采用考虑患者状态和治疗目标的个性化方法。
{"title":"Radical Resection Compared to Local Excision for Very Old Patients With Stage 1 Rectal Cancer: An Exact-Match Analysis of the SEER Database.","authors":"Rachel Gefen, Sameh Hany Emile, Zoe Garoufalia, Justin Dourado, Nir Horesh, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1002/jso.70197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific-survival (CSS) of radical resection compared to local excision for stage 1 rectal cancer in very old patients (≥ 80 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent surgery for stage 1 rectal cancer from the SEER database from 2000-2020. Patients were divided into radical resection and local excision groups, and were exact matched for T stage, tumor grade, and tumor size. The main outcome measures were OS and CSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6379 patients ≥ 80 years underwent local or radical resection of stage 1 rectal cancer; 51.9% were female and 47% had T1 tumors. After matching, 1125 patients were included in each group. The median OS was longer in patients who underwent radical resection (60 months vs. 51 months, p = 0.009), yet there were no significant differences in CSS between the two groups. When stratified by the T stage, there was no benefit for radical resection in T1 tumors (p = 0.33). In multivariate analysis, radical resection and local excision had similar hazard of mortality (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.76-1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radical resection and local excision had similar CSS in very old patients with stage 1 rectal cancer. A personalized approach considering patient status and treatment goals should be used for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of the Condyle in Posterior Mandibular Reconstruction: Major Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes. 后下颌重建术中髁突的处理:主要临床和患者报告的结果。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70182
Janet C Coleman-Belin, Kevin K Zhang, Zack Cohen, Louise Cunningham, Danielle Olla, Nima Khavanin, Jonathan Rubin, Joshua Barnett, Jennifer R Cracchiolo, Farooq Shahzad, Jonas A Nelson, Evan Matros, Robert J Allen

Background and objectives: Tumor involvement of the posterior mandible often requires resection of the mandibular condyle and associated soft tissue. This study explores clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with condyle preservation versus resection during reconstruction.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent bony free flap reconstruction of posterolateral mandible defects from 2017 to 2021. Major clinical outcomes included length of stay (LOS), duration of follow-up, cancer recurrence, and all-cause mortality. PROs were assessed using the validated FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer module survey for overall, short-term (0-1 year postoperatively), and long-term (> 1 year postoperatively) outcomes. The cohorts included (1) condyle preservation, (2) condyle resection with condyle autotransplantation, and (3) condyle resection without autotransplantation.

Results: 94 patients were included in the study. Major clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between cohorts (all p > 0.439). Compared to the condyle-resected cohort, condyle-preserved patients overall reported superior Overall Facial Appearance (p = 0.035), Eating Function (p = 0.034), Appearance/Face Distress (p = 0.020), Eating Distress (p = 0.017), and Cancer Worry (p = 0.002). Long-term assessments revealed more marked advantages for in-situ condyle preservation compared to condyle resection in Overall Facial Appearance (p = 0.022), Eating Function (p = 0.004), Smiling Function (p = 0.035), Swallowing Function (p = 0.003), Eating Distress (p = 0.006), and Cancer Worry (p = 0.011). Among condyle-resected patients, condyle autograft did not significantly improve FACE-Q scores (all p > 0.177).

Conclusions: In-situ condyle preservation yielded superior PROs compared to condyle resection ± condyle autograft, particularly over 1 year postoperatively. Major clinical outcomes did not significantly differ.

背景和目的:肿瘤累及后下颌骨通常需要切除下颌髁及相关软组织。本研究探讨了重建期间保留髁突与切除髁突相关的临床和患者报告的结果(PROs)。方法:本回顾性队列研究调查了2017年至2021年接受骨游离皮瓣重建下颌后外侧缺损的患者。主要临床结果包括住院时间(LOS)、随访时间、癌症复发和全因死亡率。使用经过验证的FACE-Q头颈癌模块调查对PROs进行总体、短期(术后0-1年)和长期(术后0-1年)结果的评估。队列包括(1)保留髁突,(2)切除髁突并进行自体髁突移植,(3)切除髁突而不进行自体髁突移植。结果:94例患者纳入研究。各组间主要临床结局无显著差异(p < 0.05)。与切除髁突的患者相比,保留髁突的患者总体上报告了更好的整体面部外观(p = 0.035),饮食功能(p = 0.034),外观/面部窘迫(p = 0.020),饮食窘迫(p = 0.017)和癌症担忧(p = 0.002)。长期评估显示,与髁突切除相比,原位保存髁突在整体面部外观(p = 0.022)、进食功能(p = 0.004)、微笑功能(p = 0.035)、吞咽功能(p = 0.003)、进食困扰(p = 0.006)和癌症担忧(p = 0.011)方面具有更显著的优势。在髁突切除患者中,自体髁突移植未显著改善FACE-Q评分(均p < 0.177)。结论:与髁突切除+自体髁突移植相比,原位保存髁突具有更高的PROs,特别是在术后1年以上。主要临床结果无显著差异。
{"title":"Management of the Condyle in Posterior Mandibular Reconstruction: Major Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Janet C Coleman-Belin, Kevin K Zhang, Zack Cohen, Louise Cunningham, Danielle Olla, Nima Khavanin, Jonathan Rubin, Joshua Barnett, Jennifer R Cracchiolo, Farooq Shahzad, Jonas A Nelson, Evan Matros, Robert J Allen","doi":"10.1002/jso.70182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tumor involvement of the posterior mandible often requires resection of the mandibular condyle and associated soft tissue. This study explores clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with condyle preservation versus resection during reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent bony free flap reconstruction of posterolateral mandible defects from 2017 to 2021. Major clinical outcomes included length of stay (LOS), duration of follow-up, cancer recurrence, and all-cause mortality. PROs were assessed using the validated FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer module survey for overall, short-term (0-1 year postoperatively), and long-term (> 1 year postoperatively) outcomes. The cohorts included (1) condyle preservation, (2) condyle resection with condyle autotransplantation, and (3) condyle resection without autotransplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94 patients were included in the study. Major clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between cohorts (all p > 0.439). Compared to the condyle-resected cohort, condyle-preserved patients overall reported superior Overall Facial Appearance (p = 0.035), Eating Function (p = 0.034), Appearance/Face Distress (p = 0.020), Eating Distress (p = 0.017), and Cancer Worry (p = 0.002). Long-term assessments revealed more marked advantages for in-situ condyle preservation compared to condyle resection in Overall Facial Appearance (p = 0.022), Eating Function (p = 0.004), Smiling Function (p = 0.035), Swallowing Function (p = 0.003), Eating Distress (p = 0.006), and Cancer Worry (p = 0.011). Among condyle-resected patients, condyle autograft did not significantly improve FACE-Q scores (all p > 0.177).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-situ condyle preservation yielded superior PROs compared to condyle resection ± condyle autograft, particularly over 1 year postoperatively. Major clinical outcomes did not significantly differ.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical Quality Indicators for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: Suggestions From the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology. 局部晚期乳腺癌的手术质量指标:来自巴西外科肿瘤学会的建议。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70159
René Aloisio da Costa Vieira, Eid Gonçalves Coelho, Juliano Rodrigues da Cunha, Renato Cagnacci Neto, Rodrigo Castanho de Campos Leite, Rafael Alves Perdomo, Eldom de Medeiros Soares, Reitan Ribeiro, Heládio Feitosa E Castro Neto, Alexandre Ferreira Oliveira, Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro

Locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) is a frequent condition in Brazil and in developing countries. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has allowed for surgical de-escalation of the breast and/or axilla, leading to increasing the rates of breast-conserving-surgery, skin/nipple preservative mastectomies and axillary preservation. There are no established quality indicators for LABC or NST. This article aimed to review the topic, highlighting Brazilian studies, identifying thirty potential quality indicators for surgical treatment.

局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)是巴西和发展中国家的一种常见疾病。新辅助全身治疗(NST)允许手术降低乳房和/或腋窝的恶化程度,从而增加了乳房保留手术、皮肤/乳头保留乳房切除术和腋窝保留的发生率。LABC和NST没有既定的质量指标。本文旨在回顾这一主题,强调巴西的研究,确定30个潜在的手术治疗质量指标。
{"title":"Surgical Quality Indicators for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: Suggestions From the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology.","authors":"René Aloisio da Costa Vieira, Eid Gonçalves Coelho, Juliano Rodrigues da Cunha, Renato Cagnacci Neto, Rodrigo Castanho de Campos Leite, Rafael Alves Perdomo, Eldom de Medeiros Soares, Reitan Ribeiro, Heládio Feitosa E Castro Neto, Alexandre Ferreira Oliveira, Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro","doi":"10.1002/jso.70159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) is a frequent condition in Brazil and in developing countries. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has allowed for surgical de-escalation of the breast and/or axilla, leading to increasing the rates of breast-conserving-surgery, skin/nipple preservative mastectomies and axillary preservation. There are no established quality indicators for LABC or NST. This article aimed to review the topic, highlighting Brazilian studies, identifying thirty potential quality indicators for surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Outcomes Among Vietnamese American Women: A Systematic Review. 越南裔美国妇女乳腺癌筛查、诊断和预后的差异:一项系统综述。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1002/jso.70164
Antoinette T Nguyen, Emily D Duckworth, Rena A Li, Robert D Galiano

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally. Vietnamese women experience unique challenges, including sociocultural, linguistic, and systemic barriers, contributing to disparities in screening utilization, late-stage diagnoses, and treatment outcomes. Despite advances in early detection and care, inequities persist. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for original studies published from 2000 to 2024 examining breast cancer screening, outcomes, molecular/genetic features, and disparities in Vietnamese populations. Narrative synthesis was employed due to heterogeneity in study metrics and methodologies. Forty-one studies encompassing 39,324 Vietnamese participants (mean age 48.15 ± 7.48 years) were included. Social networks and acculturation positively influenced screening uptake, while systemic barriers such as language, cultural stigma, and lack of insurance deterred participation. Across included studies, mammography screening rates among Vietnamese women ranged widely from 26% to 83%, consistently lower than the U.S. national average of 81%, and lower than rates reported in many Asian American subgroups. Late-stage diagnoses were prevalent, occurring in 32.9% of Vietnamese women, with foreign-born Vietnamese women exhibiting higher mortality than U.S.-born counterparts. Molecular studies revealed distinct tumor subtypes, including higher HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer rates. Interventions, including culturally tailored education and patient navigator programs, demonstrated success in addressing screening and care disparities. Vietnamese women face significant breast cancer disparities driven by sociocultural, systemic, and biological factors. Effective solutions require integrating culturally tailored solutions to promote equitable outcomes and reduce disparities in breast cancer care.

乳腺癌仍然是全球妇女癌症相关死亡的主要原因。越南妇女面临着独特的挑战,包括社会文化、语言和系统障碍,导致筛查利用、晚期诊断和治疗结果的差异。尽管在早期发现和护理方面取得了进展,但不平等现象依然存在。按照PRISMA指南进行了系统审查,并在PROSPERO上注册了该方案。检索了PubMed、Embase和Scopus从2000年到2024年发表的关于越南人群乳腺癌筛查、结果、分子/遗传特征和差异的原始研究。由于研究指标和方法的异质性,采用叙事综合。41项研究包括39,324名越南参与者(平均年龄48.15±7.48岁)。社会网络和文化适应对筛查的吸收有积极影响,而语言、文化耻辱和缺乏保险等系统性障碍则阻碍了参与。在纳入的研究中,越南女性的乳房x光检查率从26%到83%不等,一直低于美国81%的全国平均水平,也低于许多亚裔美国人亚群的报告率。晚期诊断很普遍,32.9%的越南女性患有此病,在外国出生的越南女性的死亡率高于在美国出生的越南女性。分子研究揭示了不同的肿瘤亚型,包括更高的her2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌发病率。干预措施,包括针对不同文化的教育和患者导航项目,在解决筛查和护理差异方面取得了成功。由于社会文化、体制和生物学因素,越南妇女面临着显著的乳腺癌差异。有效的解决方案需要结合适合不同文化的解决方案,以促进公平的结果并减少乳腺癌护理方面的差异。
{"title":"Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Outcomes Among Vietnamese American Women: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Antoinette T Nguyen, Emily D Duckworth, Rena A Li, Robert D Galiano","doi":"10.1002/jso.70164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally. Vietnamese women experience unique challenges, including sociocultural, linguistic, and systemic barriers, contributing to disparities in screening utilization, late-stage diagnoses, and treatment outcomes. Despite advances in early detection and care, inequities persist. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for original studies published from 2000 to 2024 examining breast cancer screening, outcomes, molecular/genetic features, and disparities in Vietnamese populations. Narrative synthesis was employed due to heterogeneity in study metrics and methodologies. Forty-one studies encompassing 39,324 Vietnamese participants (mean age 48.15 ± 7.48 years) were included. Social networks and acculturation positively influenced screening uptake, while systemic barriers such as language, cultural stigma, and lack of insurance deterred participation. Across included studies, mammography screening rates among Vietnamese women ranged widely from 26% to 83%, consistently lower than the U.S. national average of 81%, and lower than rates reported in many Asian American subgroups. Late-stage diagnoses were prevalent, occurring in 32.9% of Vietnamese women, with foreign-born Vietnamese women exhibiting higher mortality than U.S.-born counterparts. Molecular studies revealed distinct tumor subtypes, including higher HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer rates. Interventions, including culturally tailored education and patient navigator programs, demonstrated success in addressing screening and care disparities. Vietnamese women face significant breast cancer disparities driven by sociocultural, systemic, and biological factors. Effective solutions require integrating culturally tailored solutions to promote equitable outcomes and reduce disparities in breast cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Surgical Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1