首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Surgical Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Risk of Death From Other Diseases in Lung Cancer Patients After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy. 肺癌患者亚肺叶切除术与肺叶切除术后死于其他疾病的风险。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27927
Masayuki Nakao, Ayumi Suzuki, Junji Ichinose, Yosuke Matsuura, Sakae Okumura, Mingyon Mun

Background and objectives: A recent Japanese phase three clinical trial for lung cancer suggested a possible advantage of segmentectomy over lobectomy in terms of death from other diseases. This study aimed to compare the risk of death from other diseases based on surgical procedures in lung cancer patients without recurrence.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 2121 patients without disease recurrence after curative resection for lung cancer at our institution. Patient characteristics and overall survival were compared between sublobar resection and lobectomy.

Results: The sublobar group (n = 595) had a significantly higher proportion of women, non-smokers, patients without comorbidities, patients with a history of other cancers, and patients with earlier-staged disease when compared with the lobectomy group (n = 1526). The overall survival was significantly longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.0034). After adjusting for background characteristics in an analysis of 488 patients, the overall survival had a trend to be longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.071).

Conclusions: Our results suggested that the risk of death from other diseases was potentially higher after lobectomy than after sublobar resection. Although several clinical factors could influence the results, these results may support the benefit of sublobar resection, assuming that the curability of both procedures is similar.

背景和目的:最近日本的一项肺癌三期临床试验表明,就其他疾病导致的死亡而言,分段切除术可能比肺叶切除术更具优势。本研究旨在根据肺癌无复发患者的手术方式,比较死于其他疾病的风险:我们回顾性研究了本院 2121 名肺癌根治性切除术后未复发的患者。比较了亚肺叶切除术和肺叶切除术的患者特征和总生存率:结果:与肺叶切除术组(n = 1526)相比,亚叶状切除术组(n = 595)中女性、非吸烟者、无合并症患者、有其他癌症病史患者和早期患者的比例明显更高。肺叶切除术组的总生存率明显高于肺叶切除术组(P = 0.0034)。在对488名患者的分析中,对背景特征进行调整后,肺叶下组的总生存期有长于肺叶切除组的趋势(p = 0.071):我们的研究结果表明,肺叶切除术后死于其他疾病的风险可能高于肺叶下切除术。尽管一些临床因素可能会影响结果,但假定两种手术的治愈率相似,这些结果可能会支持肺叶下切除术的益处。
{"title":"Risk of Death From Other Diseases in Lung Cancer Patients After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy.","authors":"Masayuki Nakao, Ayumi Suzuki, Junji Ichinose, Yosuke Matsuura, Sakae Okumura, Mingyon Mun","doi":"10.1002/jso.27927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>A recent Japanese phase three clinical trial for lung cancer suggested a possible advantage of segmentectomy over lobectomy in terms of death from other diseases. This study aimed to compare the risk of death from other diseases based on surgical procedures in lung cancer patients without recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 2121 patients without disease recurrence after curative resection for lung cancer at our institution. Patient characteristics and overall survival were compared between sublobar resection and lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sublobar group (n = 595) had a significantly higher proportion of women, non-smokers, patients without comorbidities, patients with a history of other cancers, and patients with earlier-staged disease when compared with the lobectomy group (n = 1526). The overall survival was significantly longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.0034). After adjusting for background characteristics in an analysis of 488 patients, the overall survival had a trend to be longer in the sublobar group than in the lobectomy group (p = 0.071).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggested that the risk of death from other diseases was potentially higher after lobectomy than after sublobar resection. Although several clinical factors could influence the results, these results may support the benefit of sublobar resection, assuming that the curability of both procedures is similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). 实施腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)的细胞修复手术(CRS)多学科术后强化恢复(ERAS)计划。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27931
Cecily Stockley, Antoine Bouchard-Fortier, Jennifer Mateshaytis, Kadhim Taqi, Lloyd Mack, Gregg Nelson, Michael Chong, Melina Deban

Background and objectives: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can be associated with prolonged hospital stays. A novel Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) based on ERAS Society guidelines was designed and implemented. The primary outcome was ERAS compliance. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective study on patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between 2018 and 2022, with ERAS implementation in 2022. Health records were reviewed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon tests, Student t-test, and χ2 and binomial negative regression. Health Ethics Research Board approval was obtained.

Results: Eighty patients underwent CRS/HIPEC: 59 in the pre-ERAS group and 21 in the post-ERAS group. Groups were similar in age, comorbidities, and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index. ERAS compliance increased from 32.8% to 70.8% (p < 0.001). Median LOS decreased from 14 to 9 days (p < 0.001). Comparing pre-ERAS to post-ERAS showed no significant difference in the major morbidity rate (13.6% vs. 9.5%) or 30-day readmission (9.4% vs. 4.8%) and no mortalities. Controlling for patient characteristics, the mean LOS decreased by 6.94 days (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Implementation of an ERAS CRS/HIPEC program is safe and allows for improved compliance to ERAS protocols and a significant reduction in LOS.

背景和目的:带有腹腔内热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)的去细胞手术可能会导致住院时间延长。根据 ERAS 协会的指导方针,设计并实施了一种新的术后强化恢复 (ERAS)。主要结果是ERAS依从性。次要结果包括住院时间(LOS)和术后并发症:对 2018 年至 2022 年期间接受 CRS/HIPEC 的患者进行回顾性研究,ERAS 于 2022 年实施。回顾了健康记录。统计分析包括描述性统计、Wilcoxon 检验、学生 t 检验、χ2 和二项式负回归。研究结果获得了卫生伦理研究委员会的批准:80名患者接受了CRS/HIPEC治疗:ERAS前组59人,ERAS后组21人。两组患者的年龄、合并症和腹膜癌变指数相似。ERAS的依从性从32.8%提高到70.8%(P 结论:ERAS的依从性从32.8%提高到70.8%:实施 ERAS CRS/HIPEC 计划是安全的,可提高 ERAS 方案的依从性,并显著缩短 LOS。
{"title":"Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).","authors":"Cecily Stockley, Antoine Bouchard-Fortier, Jennifer Mateshaytis, Kadhim Taqi, Lloyd Mack, Gregg Nelson, Michael Chong, Melina Deban","doi":"10.1002/jso.27931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27931","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can be associated with prolonged hospital stays. A novel Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) based on ERAS Society guidelines was designed and implemented. The primary outcome was ERAS compliance. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study on patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between 2018 and 2022, with ERAS implementation in 2022. Health records were reviewed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon tests, Student t-test, and χ<sup>2</sup> and binomial negative regression. Health Ethics Research Board approval was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients underwent CRS/HIPEC: 59 in the pre-ERAS group and 21 in the post-ERAS group. Groups were similar in age, comorbidities, and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index. ERAS compliance increased from 32.8% to 70.8% (p < 0.001). Median LOS decreased from 14 to 9 days (p < 0.001). Comparing pre-ERAS to post-ERAS showed no significant difference in the major morbidity rate (13.6% vs. 9.5%) or 30-day readmission (9.4% vs. 4.8%) and no mortalities. Controlling for patient characteristics, the mean LOS decreased by 6.94 days (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an ERAS CRS/HIPEC program is safe and allows for improved compliance to ERAS protocols and a significant reduction in LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter Regarding "Factors Associated With Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With Bone Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Study of 481 Patients". 关于 "骨转移黑色素瘤患者发生骨骼相关事件的相关因素:对 481 名患者的回顾性研究 "的信函。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27915
Jianjun Li, Wenjing Cheng
{"title":"Letter Regarding \"Factors Associated With Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With Bone Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Study of 481 Patients\".","authors":"Jianjun Li, Wenjing Cheng","doi":"10.1002/jso.27915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27915","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Oncological Outcomes of Patients With Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. 新辅助疗法对远端胰腺腺癌患者肿瘤治疗效果的影响
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27856
Asmita Chopra, Anthony Gebran, Hussein Khachfe, Rudy El Asmar, Ibrahim Nassour, Sowmya Narayanan, Samer AlMasri, Aatur Singhi, Kenneth Lee, Amer Zureikat, Alessandro Paniccia

Background: Distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (D-PDAC) often presents at an advanced stage. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in improving outcomes for D-PDAC is not well-established. This study evaluates the impact of NAT on the oncological outcomes of patients with D-PDAC.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with resectable and borderline-resectable D-PDAC treated at a single center from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Stratification was based on initial treatment-NAT or surgery first (SF). Survival analysis, following intention-to-treat framework, used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to assess NAT's impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of D-PDAC.

Results: Among 141 patients (median age 69.8 years, 51.8% females) included in the study, 71 (50.4%) received NAT and 70 (49.6%) were planned for SF. Patients receiving NAT were younger (65.9 vs. 72.6 years) and had higher incidence of borderline-resectable disease (31% vs. 4.3%) (both p < 0.05) than those undergoing SF. Thirteen patients (18.3%) undergoing NAT and five (7.1%) in SF group, failed to undergo resection. Univariate comparison showed no difference in the PFS (SF:13.97 vs. NAT:17.00 months, p = 0.6), and OS (SF:23.73 vs. NAT:32.53 months, p = 0.35). Multivariate Cox regression analysis noted significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.42-0.96, p = 0.031) and OS (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.93, p = 0.021) with NAT.

Conclusion: NAT is associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with -D-PDAC. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

背景:远端胰腺导管腺癌(D-PDAC)通常处于晚期。新辅助治疗(NAT)在改善D-PDAC预后方面的疗效尚未得到充分证实。本研究评估了 NAT 对 D-PDAC 患者肿瘤治疗效果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究针对2012年至2020年期间在一个中心接受治疗的可切除和边缘可切除D-PDAC连续患者。根据初始治疗--NAT或先手术(SF)进行分层。根据意向治疗框架,采用卡普兰-梅耶尔和考克斯回归进行生存分析,评估NAT对D-PDAC无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响:在纳入研究的141名患者(中位年龄69.8岁,51.8%为女性)中,71人(50.4%)接受了NAT治疗,70人(49.6%)计划接受SF治疗。接受 NAT 治疗的患者更年轻(65.9 岁对 72.6 岁),边缘可切除疾病的发生率更高(31% 对 4.3%)(均为 p 结论:NAT 与改善 PFS 相关:NAT可改善-D-PDAC患者的PFS和OS。需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Oncological Outcomes of Patients With Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Asmita Chopra, Anthony Gebran, Hussein Khachfe, Rudy El Asmar, Ibrahim Nassour, Sowmya Narayanan, Samer AlMasri, Aatur Singhi, Kenneth Lee, Amer Zureikat, Alessandro Paniccia","doi":"10.1002/jso.27856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (D-PDAC) often presents at an advanced stage. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in improving outcomes for D-PDAC is not well-established. This study evaluates the impact of NAT on the oncological outcomes of patients with D-PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with resectable and borderline-resectable D-PDAC treated at a single center from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Stratification was based on initial treatment-NAT or surgery first (SF). Survival analysis, following intention-to-treat framework, used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to assess NAT's impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of D-PDAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 patients (median age 69.8 years, 51.8% females) included in the study, 71 (50.4%) received NAT and 70 (49.6%) were planned for SF. Patients receiving NAT were younger (65.9 vs. 72.6 years) and had higher incidence of borderline-resectable disease (31% vs. 4.3%) (both p < 0.05) than those undergoing SF. Thirteen patients (18.3%) undergoing NAT and five (7.1%) in SF group, failed to undergo resection. Univariate comparison showed no difference in the PFS (SF:13.97 vs. NAT:17.00 months, p = 0.6), and OS (SF:23.73 vs. NAT:32.53 months, p = 0.35). Multivariate Cox regression analysis noted significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.42-0.96, p = 0.031) and OS (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.93, p = 0.021) with NAT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAT is associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with -D-PDAC. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection Versus Colonization on Postoperative Outcomes After Oncological Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Single-Center Study With Propensity Score Analysis. 艰难梭菌感染与定植对肿瘤性结直肠手术术后结果的影响:带有倾向性评分分析的单中心观察性研究。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27923
Wee Liam Ong, Stefan Morarasu, Sorinel Lunca, Romulus Mihaita Pruna, Cristian Ene Roata, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte

Background: There is limited research available concerning the risk anastomotic leakage in the context of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Herein, we aim to elucidate the correlation between CDI, encompassing both preoperative asymptomatic C. difficile carriers (CDC) and postoperative hospital acquired C. difficile infections (HA-CDI), and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing oncological colorectal surgery.

Methods: This is an observational, single-center study. Data were sourced from surgical logs between 2018 and 2023, via the hospital's electronic system. Patients were split into three subgroups: CDC, HA-CDI, and control group (CG). Groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, morbidity, and mortality via Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias.

Results: A total of 522 patients were analyzed, split into three subgroups: CDC, n = 35; HA-CDI, n = 27; CG, n = 460. One-to-one propensity score matching reduced the CG to 62 patients. Patients in the HA-CDI group had higher rates of overall morbidity (p < 0.0001), higher rates of anastomotic leaks (p = 0.002), more surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.001), and a longer length of stay (26 vs. 11.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.001), while patients in the CDC group had comparable rates of complications with the CG.

Conclusion: HA-CDI is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak after oncological colorectal surgery, while asymptomatic CDC do not have higher morbidity and may be operated electively, under standard CD treatment.

背景:关于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)背景下吻合口漏风险的研究十分有限。在此,我们旨在阐明艰难梭菌感染(包括术前无症状艰难梭菌携带者(CDC)和术后医院获得性艰难梭菌感染(HA-CDI))与接受肿瘤性结直肠手术的患者发生吻合口漏之间的相关性:这是一项单中心观察性研究。数据来源于医院电子系统中 2018 年至 2023 年期间的手术日志。患者被分为三个亚组:CDC组、HA-CDI组和对照组(CG)。通过费雪精确检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对各组的患者特征、发病率和死亡率进行比较。为减少选择偏差,进行了一对一倾向评分匹配:共对 522 名患者进行了分析,分为三个亚组:CDC,n=35;HA-CDI,n=27;CG,n=460。一对一倾向得分匹配使 CG 组患者减少到 62 人。HA-CDI 组患者的总发病率较高(p 结论:HA-CDI 与较高的发病率有关:HA-CDI 与肿瘤性结直肠手术后吻合口漏的较高风险有关,而无症状 CDC 的发病率并不高,可在标准 CD 治疗下进行选择性手术。
{"title":"Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection Versus Colonization on Postoperative Outcomes After Oncological Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Single-Center Study With Propensity Score Analysis.","authors":"Wee Liam Ong, Stefan Morarasu, Sorinel Lunca, Romulus Mihaita Pruna, Cristian Ene Roata, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte","doi":"10.1002/jso.27923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited research available concerning the risk anastomotic leakage in the context of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Herein, we aim to elucidate the correlation between CDI, encompassing both preoperative asymptomatic C. difficile carriers (CDC) and postoperative hospital acquired C. difficile infections (HA-CDI), and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing oncological colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational, single-center study. Data were sourced from surgical logs between 2018 and 2023, via the hospital's electronic system. Patients were split into three subgroups: CDC, HA-CDI, and control group (CG). Groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, morbidity, and mortality via Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 522 patients were analyzed, split into three subgroups: CDC, n = 35; HA-CDI, n = 27; CG, n = 460. One-to-one propensity score matching reduced the CG to 62 patients. Patients in the HA-CDI group had higher rates of overall morbidity (p < 0.0001), higher rates of anastomotic leaks (p = 0.002), more surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.001), and a longer length of stay (26 vs. 11.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.001), while patients in the CDC group had comparable rates of complications with the CG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HA-CDI is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak after oncological colorectal surgery, while asymptomatic CDC do not have higher morbidity and may be operated electively, under standard CD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delay in Time to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and its Impact on Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of 1480 Cases From the Indian HIPEC Registry. 晚期卵巢癌最佳细胞减灭术患者辅助化疗时间的延迟及其对肿瘤学结果的影响:对印度 HIPEC 登记的 1480 例病例的分析。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27896
Somashekhar Sp, Rohit Kumar C, Ashwin Kr, Ramya Y, Arun Kumar N, Aaron Marian Fernandez, Vijay Ahuja

Background and objectives: The impact of delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following optimal CRS in different settings of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer needs to be studied with special reference to CRS HIPEC.

Methods: The 1480 advanced EOC patients underwent optimal CRS, followed by adjuvant chemotheraphy, with or without intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in Normothermic or Hyperthermic form. Interval between the day of surgery and start of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on outcome was analyzed.

Results: CRS, CRS with IP or HIPEC was done in 400, 480, and 600 patients respectively. Median interval of starting adjuvant chemotherapy was 32 days CRS group, 34 days CRS + IP group and 41 days CRS + HIPEC group. Delay in chemotherapy impacted on recurrence free survival (RFS) in CRS + IV group (36 vs. 17 months: p = 0.02) and some impact in CRS + IP group (38 vs. 28 months; P 0.78) and no impact on CRS + HIPEC group (35 vs. 32 months; p = 0.17).

Conclusions: Delay in starting adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects RFS in patients undergoing optimal CRS alone. However, the delay didn't have an impact in the CRS + HIPEC group. Well-designed clinical studies are required to evaluate the impact of single dose of HIPEC.

背景和目的:需要研究在晚期卵巢癌不同治疗环境下最佳CRS后延迟开始辅助化疗的影响,特别是CRS HIPEC:1480名晚期卵巢癌患者接受了最佳CRS治疗,随后接受了辅助化疗,并接受或不接受常温或低温腹腔内化疗。分析了手术当天与开始辅助化疗之间的时间间隔及其对疗效的影响:结果:分别有400、480和600名患者接受了CRS、CRS加IP或HIPEC化疗。CRS 组、CRS + IP 组和 CRS + HIPEC 组开始辅助化疗的中位间隔分别为 32 天、34 天和 41 天。化疗延迟对CRS + IV组的无复发生存期(RFS)有影响(36个月对17个月:P = 0.02),对CRS + IP组有一定影响(38个月对28个月;P 0.78),对CRS + HIPEC组没有影响(35个月对32个月;P = 0.17):结论:延迟开始辅助化疗会对单独接受最佳CRS治疗的患者的RFS产生不利影响。结论:延迟开始辅助化疗会对单独接受最佳CRS治疗的患者的RFS产生不利影响,但延迟开始辅助化疗对CRS + HIPEC组患者没有影响。要评估单剂量HIPEC的影响,还需要进行精心设计的临床研究。
{"title":"Delay in Time to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and its Impact on Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of 1480 Cases From the Indian HIPEC Registry.","authors":"Somashekhar Sp, Rohit Kumar C, Ashwin Kr, Ramya Y, Arun Kumar N, Aaron Marian Fernandez, Vijay Ahuja","doi":"10.1002/jso.27896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27896","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The impact of delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following optimal CRS in different settings of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer needs to be studied with special reference to CRS HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 1480 advanced EOC patients underwent optimal CRS, followed by adjuvant chemotheraphy, with or without intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in Normothermic or Hyperthermic form. Interval between the day of surgery and start of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on outcome was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRS, CRS with IP or HIPEC was done in 400, 480, and 600 patients respectively. Median interval of starting adjuvant chemotherapy was 32 days CRS group, 34 days CRS + IP group and 41 days CRS + HIPEC group. Delay in chemotherapy impacted on recurrence free survival (RFS) in CRS + IV group (36 vs. 17 months: p = 0.02) and some impact in CRS + IP group (38 vs. 28 months; P 0.78) and no impact on CRS + HIPEC group (35 vs. 32 months; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delay in starting adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects RFS in patients undergoing optimal CRS alone. However, the delay didn't have an impact in the CRS + HIPEC group. Well-designed clinical studies are required to evaluate the impact of single dose of HIPEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Omission of Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of PROSPECT in a National Database. 在局部晚期直肠腺癌中放弃化疗:全国数据库中的 PROSPECT 评估。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27839
Joanna T Buchheit, Lauren M Janczewski, Amy Wells, Ashley N Hardy, John D Abad, David J Bentrem, Amy L Halverson, Akhil Chawla

Background and objectives: The PROSPECT trial showed noninferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with selective chemoradiation (CRT) versus CRT alone. However, trial results are often difficult to reproduce with real-world data. Pathologic outcomes and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients in a national database.

Methods: The 2012-2020 National Cancer Database was queried for clinical T2N1 and T3N0-1 rectal adenocarcinoma patients with definitive resection. Patients were categorized by neoadjuvant treatment with CRT alone, NAC alone, and NAC with CRT. Outcomes included R0 resection, pathologic complete response (PCR), and OS.

Results: Of 18 892 patients, 16 126 (85.4%) received CRT, 1018 (5.4%) NAC, and 1748 (9.3%) NAC with CRT. Patients with NAC alone or NAC with CRT were more likely to have stage-III disease, private insurance, and academic facility treatment (all p < 0.001). NAC alone had lower adjusted odds of an R0 resection (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.54-0.95) and PCR (OR 0.77; 95%CI 0.64-0.93). NAC with CRT demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.71; 95%CI 0.61-0.82), with no difference between NAC and CRT alone. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no differences in OS were seen.

Conclusions: Patients who received NAC alone had worse pathologic outcomes. NAC had similar OS to CRT and NAC with CRT showed improved OS.

背景和目的:PROSPECT 试验表明,新辅助化疗(NAC)联合选择性化放疗(CRT)与单纯化放疗相比并无劣势。然而,试验结果往往难以用真实世界的数据重现。我们在全国数据库中对局部晚期直肠腺癌患者的病理结果和总生存率(OS)按新辅助策略进行了评估:对2012-2020年全国癌症数据库中接受明确切除术的临床T2N1和T3N0-1直肠腺癌患者进行查询。患者按单纯CRT新辅助治疗、单纯NAC新辅助治疗和NAC联合CRT新辅助治疗进行分类。结果包括R0切除、病理完全反应(PCR)和OS:在 18 892 例患者中,16 126 例(85.4%)接受了 CRT,1018 例(5.4%)接受了 NAC,1748 例(9.3%)接受了 NAC 联合 CRT。单纯接受 NAC 或 NAC 联合 CRT 的患者更有可能患有 III 期疾病、拥有私人保险和在学术机构接受治疗(均为 p 结论):仅接受 NAC 的患者病理结果较差。NAC的OS与CRT相似,而NAC联合CRT则改善了OS。
{"title":"Omission of Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of PROSPECT in a National Database.","authors":"Joanna T Buchheit, Lauren M Janczewski, Amy Wells, Ashley N Hardy, John D Abad, David J Bentrem, Amy L Halverson, Akhil Chawla","doi":"10.1002/jso.27839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The PROSPECT trial showed noninferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with selective chemoradiation (CRT) versus CRT alone. However, trial results are often difficult to reproduce with real-world data. Pathologic outcomes and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients in a national database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2012-2020 National Cancer Database was queried for clinical T2N1 and T3N0-1 rectal adenocarcinoma patients with definitive resection. Patients were categorized by neoadjuvant treatment with CRT alone, NAC alone, and NAC with CRT. Outcomes included R0 resection, pathologic complete response (PCR), and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 892 patients, 16 126 (85.4%) received CRT, 1018 (5.4%) NAC, and 1748 (9.3%) NAC with CRT. Patients with NAC alone or NAC with CRT were more likely to have stage-III disease, private insurance, and academic facility treatment (all p < 0.001). NAC alone had lower adjusted odds of an R0 resection (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.54-0.95) and PCR (OR 0.77; 95%CI 0.64-0.93). NAC with CRT demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.71; 95%CI 0.61-0.82), with no difference between NAC and CRT alone. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no differences in OS were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received NAC alone had worse pathologic outcomes. NAC had similar OS to CRT and NAC with CRT showed improved OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in the Care of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era of Chemotherapy. 现代化疗时代局部晚期胰腺癌的治疗趋势。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27851
Alexander S Thomas, Parisa Tehranifar, Wooil Kwon, Nupur Shridhar, Kazuki N Sugahara, Beth A Schrope, John A Chabot, Gulam A Manji, Jeanine M Genkinger, Michael D Kluger

Introduction: Current guidelines for treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer recommend chemotherapy ± radiation, or radiation alone when multimodal therapy is contraindicated. In a subset of patients, guideline-recommended treatment (GRT) achieves sufficient response to qualify for potentially curative resection. This study evaluated trends in treatment utilization and aimed to identify barriers to GRT.

Methods: Patients with clinical T4M0 disease in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017 were included. Potential predictors were assessed by relative risk regression with Poisson distribution and compared by log-link function.

Results: In total, 28 056 patients met the criteria. Among 17 059 (67.67%) patients treated primarily with chemotherapy, 41.19% also had radiation and 8.89% went onto resection. Many received no cancer-directed treatment or failed to receive GRT. Another 710 patients had radiation (±surgery) without chemotherapy despite few contraindications to chemotherapy. Over time, patients were more likely to undergo resection after chemotherapy (aRR = 1.58; p < 0.0001) and less likely to have chemoradiation (aRR = 0.78; p < 0.0001) or go untreated (aRR = 0.90; p < 0.0001). Socioeconomic factors (race, education, income, and insurance status) affected the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients treated with chemotherapy and particularly in those patients who went on to receive RT or undergo surgical resection. OS was also longer for patients treated at high-volume academic centers. Patients insured by Medicaid, Medicare, or those without insurance had worse OS.

Conclusions: Despite improvement over time, many patients go untreated. Clinical factors were influential, but the impact of vulnerable social standing suggests persistent inequity in access to care.

导言:目前治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的指南推荐化疗+放疗,或在多模式疗法禁忌时仅采用放疗。在一部分患者中,指南推荐的治疗(GRT)可获得足够的反应,从而有资格进行潜在的根治性切除。本研究评估了治疗利用率的趋势,并旨在确定GRT的障碍:纳入了2010年至2017年国家癌症数据库中患有临床T4M0疾病的患者。通过泊松分布相对风险回归评估潜在预测因素,并通过对数链接函数进行比较:共有 28 056 名患者符合标准。在17 059名(67.67%)主要接受化疗的患者中,41.19%的患者还接受了放疗,8.89%的患者接受了切除术。许多患者没有接受癌症导向治疗或未能接受 GRT 治疗。另有 710 名患者在没有化疗的情况下接受了放疗(±手术),尽管他们很少有化疗禁忌症。随着时间的推移,患者更有可能在化疗后接受切除术(aRR = 1.58;p 结论:随着时间的推移,患者更有可能在化疗后接受切除术:尽管随着时间的推移情况有所改善,但仍有许多患者未得到治疗。临床因素有一定的影响,但弱势社会地位的影响表明,在获得治疗方面仍存在不公平现象。
{"title":"Trends in the Care of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era of Chemotherapy.","authors":"Alexander S Thomas, Parisa Tehranifar, Wooil Kwon, Nupur Shridhar, Kazuki N Sugahara, Beth A Schrope, John A Chabot, Gulam A Manji, Jeanine M Genkinger, Michael D Kluger","doi":"10.1002/jso.27851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27851","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines for treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer recommend chemotherapy ± radiation, or radiation alone when multimodal therapy is contraindicated. In a subset of patients, guideline-recommended treatment (GRT) achieves sufficient response to qualify for potentially curative resection. This study evaluated trends in treatment utilization and aimed to identify barriers to GRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with clinical T4M0 disease in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017 were included. Potential predictors were assessed by relative risk regression with Poisson distribution and compared by log-link function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 056 patients met the criteria. Among 17 059 (67.67%) patients treated primarily with chemotherapy, 41.19% also had radiation and 8.89% went onto resection. Many received no cancer-directed treatment or failed to receive GRT. Another 710 patients had radiation (±surgery) without chemotherapy despite few contraindications to chemotherapy. Over time, patients were more likely to undergo resection after chemotherapy (aRR = 1.58; p < 0.0001) and less likely to have chemoradiation (aRR = 0.78; p < 0.0001) or go untreated (aRR = 0.90; p < 0.0001). Socioeconomic factors (race, education, income, and insurance status) affected the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients treated with chemotherapy and particularly in those patients who went on to receive RT or undergo surgical resection. OS was also longer for patients treated at high-volume academic centers. Patients insured by Medicaid, Medicare, or those without insurance had worse OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite improvement over time, many patients go untreated. Clinical factors were influential, but the impact of vulnerable social standing suggests persistent inequity in access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Surgical Management of Intracranial Metastasis Secondary to Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Carcinoma. 继发于滤泡细胞衍生型甲状腺癌的颅内转移的手术治疗。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27883
Victoria Harries, Alana Eagan, R Michael Tuttle, Ashok R Shaha, Richard J Wong, Jatin P Shah, Snehal G Patel, Cameron Brennan, Ian Ganly

Background: Intracranial metastases (ICM) from follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (FCDTC) are rare and are associated with a poor prognosis. The objective of this study is to report our experience in the surgical management of patients with ICM secondary to FCDTC.

Methods: Patients with FCDTC who underwent surgical resection of an ICM were identified at our institution from 1998 to 2018.

Results: Thirty-two patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (59%) had involvement of the brain parenchyma only, 8 (25%) had a dural-based metastasis, 3 (9%) had a calvarial metastasis with dural extension, and 2 (6%) had a skull base metastasis with dural extension. In patients who had an R0-1 resection, the estimated lesional control at the site of resection was 91% at 3 years. However, overall ICM control was 37% at 3 years due to the progression of other ICM lesions. The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 87% and 5-year DSS was 37%.

Conclusions: ICM management in FCDTC is based on the size, number, and location of metastatic lesions. Complete resection of ICM may provide lesional control at the site of resection, however, DSS is poor due to the presence of other ICMs and metastases at multiple distant sites.

背景:滤泡细胞源性甲状腺癌(FCDTC)颅内转移(ICM)非常罕见,且预后较差。本研究旨在报告我们对继发于 FCDTC 的 ICM 患者进行手术治疗的经验:方法:1998 年至 2018 年期间,我院对接受 ICM 手术切除的 FCDTC 患者进行了鉴定:本研究共纳入 32 例患者。19例患者(59%)仅累及脑实质,8例(25%)有硬脑膜转移,3例(9%)有颅骨转移伴硬脑膜扩展,2例(6%)有颅底转移伴硬脑膜扩展。在接受 R0-1 切除术的患者中,估计 3 年后切除部位的病变控制率为 91%。然而,由于其他 ICM 病变的进展,3 年后 ICM 的总体控制率为 37%。1年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为87%,5年DSS为37%:结论:FCDTC 中的 ICM 治疗取决于转移病灶的大小、数量和位置。完全切除 ICM 可控制切除部位的病变,但由于存在其他 ICM 和多个远处转移灶,DSS 较低。
{"title":"The Surgical Management of Intracranial Metastasis Secondary to Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Victoria Harries, Alana Eagan, R Michael Tuttle, Ashok R Shaha, Richard J Wong, Jatin P Shah, Snehal G Patel, Cameron Brennan, Ian Ganly","doi":"10.1002/jso.27883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracranial metastases (ICM) from follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (FCDTC) are rare and are associated with a poor prognosis. The objective of this study is to report our experience in the surgical management of patients with ICM secondary to FCDTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with FCDTC who underwent surgical resection of an ICM were identified at our institution from 1998 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (59%) had involvement of the brain parenchyma only, 8 (25%) had a dural-based metastasis, 3 (9%) had a calvarial metastasis with dural extension, and 2 (6%) had a skull base metastasis with dural extension. In patients who had an R0-1 resection, the estimated lesional control at the site of resection was 91% at 3 years. However, overall ICM control was 37% at 3 years due to the progression of other ICM lesions. The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 87% and 5-year DSS was 37%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICM management in FCDTC is based on the size, number, and location of metastatic lesions. Complete resection of ICM may provide lesional control at the site of resection, however, DSS is poor due to the presence of other ICMs and metastases at multiple distant sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mood, Anxiety, and Cognitive Alterations in Cancer Patients. 癌症患者的情绪、焦虑和认知改变。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27912
Gabriela Noronha Fortes, Marcos Fraga Fortes, Marcos Noronha Fortes, Fernanda Christoffel Gomes, Marília Cerqueira Leite Seelaendar, Ariene Murari Soares de Pinho, Joyce de Cassia Rosa de Jesus, José Pinhata Otoch

Background and objective: To analyze the cytokine profile in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as mood, anxiety, and cognition profiles in patients with CC.

Methods: One hundred and nine individuals were evaluated, 37 controls, 18 CWC, and 54 CC patients. Assessments included BDI, HADS, Digit Span, FAS-verbal, Animals/WMS-R, Matrix Reasoning and Vocabulary (WASI), and QLQ-C30.

Results: The CC group exhibited 62.96% depression and probable anxiety/depression, with 75.92% showing attention deficits. The CC and CWC groups demonstrated significant cognitive impairment on the WASI-Vocabulary test (CWC: 13.4 ± 2.2; CC: 15.9 ± 1.1) compared to the control group (Ct: 22.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.0002). In the QLQ-C30 scores, the CC group reported a greater perceived loss of quality of life and health deterioration (score of 17.5 ± 2.6) and lower scores on the Functional Scale (49.8 ± 4.5). The CC group had 18.52% illiteracy, 18.52% incomplete higher education, and 22.22% complete elementary education. The CC group also had lower weight (Ct: 67.8 ± 1.4; CWC: 61.7 ± 3.1; CC: 59.6 ± 1.7; p = 0.0023) and BMI (CC: 21.5 [18.3; 24.8]; Ct: 24.9 [23; 25.8]; p = 0.0021) compared to controls. Cytokines detected in the CSF were MCP-1, VEGF, IL-8, IP-10, and MIP-1β. Higher concentrations of MCP-1 were found in cancer patients (CSC: 571.2 ± 105.8; CC: 399.5 ± 65.9; Ct: 1477 ± 0.1; p < 0.0001), along with lower levels of MIP-1β (CC: 4345 [3060; 7353]) and VEGF (CC: 48.3 ± 2.0; CWC: 49.8 ± 3.8; Ct: 64.8 ± 3.2; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The level of mental impairment (mood, anxiety, and cognitive deficits) correlated with cancer-associated and cachexia-associated inflammation, weight loss, low BMI, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocytosis, lymphopenia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and low scores on the QLQ-C30 questionnaire (Global Health Status, Functional Scale, Symptom Scale). The CC group exhibited a higher prevalence of depression/anxiety, a stronger correlation between depression and inflammation, and greater cognitive impairment in attention, reasoning, and language, alongside lower average educational attainment. The low concentration of certain cytokines in the CSF combined with elevated systemic CRP in cancer and cachexia, associated with mental disorders, presents a paradox that requires further investigation. Higher concentrations of the cytokine MCP-1 in cancer patient groups indicated a positive correlation with the preservation of language abilities in these patients.

背景和目的分析CC患者脑脊液(CSF)中的细胞因子谱以及情绪、焦虑和认知谱:方法:对 199 人进行了评估,其中包括 37 名对照组患者、18 名 CWC 患者和 54 名 CC 患者。评估包括BDI、HADS、Digit Span、FAS-verbal、Animals/WMS-R、Matrix Reasoning and Vocabulary (WASI)和QLQ-C30:CC组有62.96%的人表现出抑郁和可能的焦虑/抑郁,75.92%的人表现出注意力缺陷。与对照组(Ct:22.8 ± 1.6;P = 0.0002)相比,CC 组和 CWC 组在 WASI 词汇测试中表现出明显的认知障碍(CWC:13.4 ± 2.2;CC:15.9 ± 1.1)。在 QLQ-C30 评分中,CC 组的生活质量下降和健康恶化感知较强(17.5 ± 2.6 分),功能量表评分较低(49.8 ± 4.5 分)。CC组文盲率为18.52%,未完成高等教育率为18.52%,完成初等教育率为22.22%。与对照组相比,CC 组的体重(Ct:67.8 ± 1.4;CWC:61.7 ± 3.1;CC:59.6 ± 1.7;P = 0.0023)和 BMI(CC:21.5 [18.3; 24.8];Ct:24.9 [23; 25.8];P = 0.0021)也较低。在 CSF 中检测到的细胞因子有 MCP-1、VEGF、IL-8、IP-10 和 MIP-1β。癌症患者的 MCP-1 浓度更高(CSC:571.2 ± 105.8;CC:399.5 ± 65.9;Ct:1477 ± 0.1; p 结论:精神损伤程度(情绪、焦虑和认知障碍)与癌症相关炎症和恶病质相关炎症、体重减轻、低体重指数、C反应蛋白(CRP)升高、白细胞增多、淋巴细胞减少、贫血、低白蛋白血症以及QLQ-C30问卷(总体健康状况、功能量表、症状量表)低分相关。CC组的抑郁/焦虑发病率更高,抑郁与炎症之间的相关性更强,注意力、推理和语言方面的认知障碍更严重,平均受教育程度也更低。某些细胞因子在脑脊液中的浓度较低,而癌症和恶病质患者的全身 CRP 却升高,这与精神障碍有关,是一个需要进一步研究的悖论。在癌症患者群体中,细胞因子 MCP-1 的浓度较高,这与这些患者语言能力的保持呈正相关。
{"title":"Mood, Anxiety, and Cognitive Alterations in Cancer Patients.","authors":"Gabriela Noronha Fortes, Marcos Fraga Fortes, Marcos Noronha Fortes, Fernanda Christoffel Gomes, Marília Cerqueira Leite Seelaendar, Ariene Murari Soares de Pinho, Joyce de Cassia Rosa de Jesus, José Pinhata Otoch","doi":"10.1002/jso.27912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To analyze the cytokine profile in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as mood, anxiety, and cognition profiles in patients with CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and nine individuals were evaluated, 37 controls, 18 CWC, and 54 CC patients. Assessments included BDI, HADS, Digit Span, FAS-verbal, Animals/WMS-R, Matrix Reasoning and Vocabulary (WASI), and QLQ-C30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CC group exhibited 62.96% depression and probable anxiety/depression, with 75.92% showing attention deficits. The CC and CWC groups demonstrated significant cognitive impairment on the WASI-Vocabulary test (CWC: 13.4 ± 2.2; CC: 15.9 ± 1.1) compared to the control group (Ct: 22.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.0002). In the QLQ-C30 scores, the CC group reported a greater perceived loss of quality of life and health deterioration (score of 17.5 ± 2.6) and lower scores on the Functional Scale (49.8 ± 4.5). The CC group had 18.52% illiteracy, 18.52% incomplete higher education, and 22.22% complete elementary education. The CC group also had lower weight (Ct: 67.8 ± 1.4; CWC: 61.7 ± 3.1; CC: 59.6 ± 1.7; p = 0.0023) and BMI (CC: 21.5 [18.3; 24.8]; Ct: 24.9 [23; 25.8]; p = 0.0021) compared to controls. Cytokines detected in the CSF were MCP-1, VEGF, IL-8, IP-10, and MIP-1β. Higher concentrations of MCP-1 were found in cancer patients (CSC: 571.2 ± 105.8; CC: 399.5 ± 65.9; Ct: 1477 ± 0.1; p < 0.0001), along with lower levels of MIP-1β (CC: 4345 [3060; 7353]) and VEGF (CC: 48.3 ± 2.0; CWC: 49.8 ± 3.8; Ct: 64.8 ± 3.2; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The level of mental impairment (mood, anxiety, and cognitive deficits) correlated with cancer-associated and cachexia-associated inflammation, weight loss, low BMI, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocytosis, lymphopenia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and low scores on the QLQ-C30 questionnaire (Global Health Status, Functional Scale, Symptom Scale). The CC group exhibited a higher prevalence of depression/anxiety, a stronger correlation between depression and inflammation, and greater cognitive impairment in attention, reasoning, and language, alongside lower average educational attainment. The low concentration of certain cytokines in the CSF combined with elevated systemic CRP in cancer and cachexia, associated with mental disorders, presents a paradox that requires further investigation. Higher concentrations of the cytokine MCP-1 in cancer patient groups indicated a positive correlation with the preservation of language abilities in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Surgical Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1