首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Surgical Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
The Significance of the Morphological Appearance of Peritoneal Lesions on Imaging in Patients With Peritoneal Malignancies-A Report From Phase 1 of the PRECINCT Study. 腹膜恶性肿瘤患者腹膜病变在影像学上的形态学表现的意义--PRECINCT 研究第一阶段的报告。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27869
Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,Amine Souadka,Marcello Deraco,Paolo Sammartino,Armando Sardi,Olivier Glehen,
BACKGROUND AND AIMThis is a report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, in which we studied the incidence of disease at pathological evaluation in different morphological appearances of peritoneal malignancies (PM) on imaging.METHODSRadiological findings were captured in a specific format that included a description of the morphological appearance of PM and a correlation performed with pathological findings.RESULTSIn 630 patients enroled at seven centres (September 2022-December 2023), 24 morphological terms were used. Among prespecified terms (N = 8 used in 6350 [92.2%] regions), scalloping was pathologically positive in 93.5%, confluent disease in 78.8%, tumour nodules in 69.6%, thickening in 66.1%, infiltration in 56.3%. Among unspecified appearances (N = 16) for 540 (7.8%) regions, 'enhancement' was positive in 41.5%, micronodules in 65.3% and nodularity in 60.2%. Hierarchal clustering placed gastric cancer and rare tumours together and colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma in one cluster.CONCLUSIONSThe incidence of disease at pathological evaluation for most morphological appearances was high (> 50%). Morphological description should be provided in routine radiology reports. A set of standardized terms with their description should be developed by a consensus among experienced radiologists.
背景和目的这是前瞻性、观察性 PRECINCT(常见和少见腹膜肿瘤的腹膜播散模式和对全身化疗的反应)研究第一阶段的报告,其中我们研究了不同形态表现的腹膜恶性肿瘤(PM)在影像学病理评估时的发病率。结果 在七个中心登记的 630 名患者中(2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月),共使用了 24 个形态学术语。在预先指定的术语中(N = 8,用于 6350 个区域[92.2%]),93.5% 的患者病理结果为扇形,78.8% 的患者病理结果为融合性疾病,69.6% 的患者病理结果为肿瘤结节,66.1% 的患者病理结果为增厚,56.3% 的患者病理结果为浸润。在 540 个(7.8%)区域的不明表现(N = 16)中,"增强 "阳性占 41.5%,微小结节占 65.3%,结节占 60.2%。层次聚类将胃癌和罕见肿瘤放在一起,将结直肠癌、卵巢癌和腹膜间皮瘤放在一个聚类中。常规放射学报告中应提供形态学描述。经验丰富的放射科医生应达成共识,制定一套标准化术语及其描述。
{"title":"The Significance of the Morphological Appearance of Peritoneal Lesions on Imaging in Patients With Peritoneal Malignancies-A Report From Phase 1 of the PRECINCT Study.","authors":"Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,Amine Souadka,Marcello Deraco,Paolo Sammartino,Armando Sardi,Olivier Glehen,","doi":"10.1002/jso.27869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27869","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMThis is a report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, in which we studied the incidence of disease at pathological evaluation in different morphological appearances of peritoneal malignancies (PM) on imaging.METHODSRadiological findings were captured in a specific format that included a description of the morphological appearance of PM and a correlation performed with pathological findings.RESULTSIn 630 patients enroled at seven centres (September 2022-December 2023), 24 morphological terms were used. Among prespecified terms (N = 8 used in 6350 [92.2%] regions), scalloping was pathologically positive in 93.5%, confluent disease in 78.8%, tumour nodules in 69.6%, thickening in 66.1%, infiltration in 56.3%. Among unspecified appearances (N = 16) for 540 (7.8%) regions, 'enhancement' was positive in 41.5%, micronodules in 65.3% and nodularity in 60.2%. Hierarchal clustering placed gastric cancer and rare tumours together and colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma in one cluster.CONCLUSIONSThe incidence of disease at pathological evaluation for most morphological appearances was high (> 50%). Morphological description should be provided in routine radiology reports. A set of standardized terms with their description should be developed by a consensus among experienced radiologists.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes in Older Patients Eligible for Pancreatic Surgery 符合胰腺手术条件的老年患者的综合老年评估、治疗决策和结果
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27862
Marij Hartog, Sara J. E. Beishuizen, Reon Togo, Rozemarijn L. van Bruchem‐Visser, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Francesco U. S. Mattace‐Raso, Chulja J. Pek, Roeland F. de Wilde, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Harmke A. Polinder‐Bos
IntroductionPeriampullary cancer has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a potentially curative but high‐risk treatment. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can inform treatment decisions, but has not yet been evaluated in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery.MethodsThis prospective observational study included patients ≥ 70 years of age eligible for pancreatic surgery. Frailty was defined as impairment in at least two of five domains: somatic, psychological, functional, nutritional, and social. Outcomes included postoperative complications, functional decline, and mortality.ResultsOf the 88 patients included, 87 had a complete CGA. Sixty‐five patients (75%) were frail and 22 (25%) were non‐frail. Frail patients were more likely to receive nonsurgical treatment (43.1% vs. 9.1% p = 0.004). Fifty‐seven patients underwent surgery, of which 52 (59%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The incidence of postoperative delirium was three times higher in frail patients (29.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). The risk of mortality was three times higher in frail patients (HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.43–7.89, p = 0.006).ConclusionFrailty is common in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery and is associated with treatment decision, a higher incidence of delirium and a three times higher risk of all‐cause mortality. CGA can contribute to shared decision‐making and optimize perioperative care in older patients.
导言髓周癌预后较差。手术切除是一种可能治愈但风险较高的治疗方法。综合老年评估(CGA)可为治疗决策提供依据,但尚未对符合胰腺手术条件的老年患者进行评估。衰弱的定义是在躯体、心理、功能、营养和社交五个领域中至少有两个领域出现障碍。结果包括术后并发症、功能衰退和死亡率。65名患者(75%)体弱,22名患者(25%)非体弱。体弱患者更有可能接受非手术治疗(43.1% 对 9.1% p = 0.004)。57名患者接受了手术,其中52人(59%)接受了胰十二指肠切除术。体弱患者的术后谵妄发生率是普通患者的三倍(29.7% 对 0%,P = 0.005)。体弱患者的死亡风险是其他患者的三倍(HR:3.36,95% CI:1.43-7.89,p = 0.006)。结论体弱在符合胰腺手术条件的老年患者中很常见,与治疗决策、较高的谵妄发生率和三倍的全因死亡风险相关。CGA有助于共同决策并优化老年患者的围手术期护理。
{"title":"Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes in Older Patients Eligible for Pancreatic Surgery","authors":"Marij Hartog, Sara J. E. Beishuizen, Reon Togo, Rozemarijn L. van Bruchem‐Visser, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Francesco U. S. Mattace‐Raso, Chulja J. Pek, Roeland F. de Wilde, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Harmke A. Polinder‐Bos","doi":"10.1002/jso.27862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27862","url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPeriampullary cancer has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a potentially curative but high‐risk treatment. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can inform treatment decisions, but has not yet been evaluated in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery.MethodsThis prospective observational study included patients ≥ 70 years of age eligible for pancreatic surgery. Frailty was defined as impairment in at least two of five domains: somatic, psychological, functional, nutritional, and social. Outcomes included postoperative complications, functional decline, and mortality.ResultsOf the 88 patients included, 87 had a complete CGA. Sixty‐five patients (75%) were frail and 22 (25%) were non‐frail. Frail patients were more likely to receive nonsurgical treatment (43.1% vs. 9.1% <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004). Fifty‐seven patients underwent surgery, of which 52 (59%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The incidence of postoperative delirium was three times higher in frail patients (29.7% vs. 0%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.005). The risk of mortality was three times higher in frail patients (HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.43–7.89, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006).ConclusionFrailty is common in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery and is associated with treatment decision, a higher incidence of delirium and a three times higher risk of all‐cause mortality. CGA can contribute to shared decision‐making and optimize perioperative care in older patients.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Oncoplastic Surgery Safe in High‐Risk Breast Cancer Phenotypes? 肿瘤整形手术对高危乳腺癌患者安全吗?
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27899
Gabriel De La Cruz Ku, Carly Wareham, Caroline King, Akash Koul, Anshumi Desai, Sarah M. Persing, Salvatore Nardello, Abhishek Chatterjee
BackgroundOncoplastic surgery (OPS) has increased in popularity over the recent years. It is a form of breast conservation surgery allowing for larger partial mastectomy (PM) resections followed by either volume displacement or volume replacement reconstruction techniques. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of OPS with radiotherapy (OPS + RT) in high‐risk breast cancer phenotypes, such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive (HER2+) patients. Our aim was to compare the breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) and postoperative surgical complications in OPS + RT compared to PM alone with radiation (PM + RT) and total mastectomy (MTX) without radiotherapy (MTX‐RT).MethodsPatient data were analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified according to the type of surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors of BCSS.ResultsA total of 24 621 patients with high‐risk breast cancer phenotypes were identified, 180 underwent OPS + RT; 13 402, PM + RT; and 11 039 MTX‐RT. OPS + RT was more frequently performed in younger (mean age of 65.53 years, SD: 9.29, p < 0.001), non‐Hispanic White (90.5% vs. 77.7% vs. 76.3%) and single women (17.9% vs. 12.1% vs. 13.3%). MTX‐RT was usually performed in patients with high histological grade, TNBC, and higher stages. Overall complication rates were higher in the MTX‐RT, compared to OPS + RT and PM + RT, 2%, 1.1%, and 0.7%, respectively, p < 0.001. Rates of hematoma and surgical site infections were higher in the MTX‐RT group. With a median follow‐up of 46 months, OPS + RT had better BCSS rates at 5 years compared to PM + RT and MTX‐RT (97.1% vs. 94.7% vs. 89.8%, p < 0.001). MTX‐RT was found to be an independent prognostic factor of worse BCSS compared to OPS + RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.584; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005–7.171), while PM + RT had no difference compared to OPS + RT (HR = 1.670, 95% CI: 0.624–4.469).ConclusionsOPS is a safe breast surgical option in patients with HER2+ and TNBC. Patients with high‐risk phenotypes who underwent OPS + RT and have similar BCSS and complication rates compared to standard breast surgical options. As such, OPS should be considered as an option whenever breast conservation surgery is being discussed.
背景近年来,乳房整形手术(Oncoplastic surgery,OPS)越来越受欢迎。它是一种乳房保护手术,可进行较大的乳房部分切除术(PM),然后采用体积置换或体积替代重建技术。然而,对于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和HER2阳性(HER2+)患者等高危乳腺癌表型,OPS+放疗(OPS+RT)的有效性和安全性还缺乏证据。我们的目的是比较OPS+RT与单纯PM+放疗(PM+RT)和全乳房切除术(MTX)+放疗(MTX-RT)相比的乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)和术后手术并发症。方法对2012年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)癌症登记处的患者数据进行分析。根据手术类型对患者进行了分层。结果共发现24 621例高风险乳腺癌患者,其中180例接受了OPS+RT;13 402例接受了PM+RT;11 039例接受了MTX-RT。更多年轻(平均年龄 65.53 岁,SD:9.29,p < 0.001)、非西班牙裔白人(90.5% vs. 77.7% vs. 76.3%)和单身女性(17.9% vs. 12.1% vs. 13.3%)接受了 OPS + RT。MTX-RT通常用于组织学分级高、TNBC和分期较高的患者。与OPS + RT和PM + RT相比,MTX-RT的总体并发症发生率更高,分别为2%、1.1%和0.7%,P< 0.001。MTX-RT组的血肿和手术部位感染率更高。中位随访时间为46个月,与PM + RT和MTX-RT相比,OPS + RT在5年内的BCSS率更高(97.1% vs. 94.7% vs. 89.8%,p <0.001)。与OPS + RT相比,MTX-RT是BCSS恶化的独立预后因素(危险比[HR] = 2.584;95%置信区间[CI]:1.005-7.171),而PM + RT与OPS + RT相比没有差异(HR = 1.670,95% CI:0.624-4.469)。与标准乳腺手术方案相比,接受OPS+RT的高风险表型患者的BCSS和并发症发生率相似。因此,无论何时讨论保乳手术,都应将 OPS 作为一种选择。
{"title":"Is Oncoplastic Surgery Safe in High‐Risk Breast Cancer Phenotypes?","authors":"Gabriel De La Cruz Ku, Carly Wareham, Caroline King, Akash Koul, Anshumi Desai, Sarah M. Persing, Salvatore Nardello, Abhishek Chatterjee","doi":"10.1002/jso.27899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27899","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOncoplastic surgery (OPS) has increased in popularity over the recent years. It is a form of breast conservation surgery allowing for larger partial mastectomy (PM) resections followed by either volume displacement or volume replacement reconstruction techniques. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of OPS with radiotherapy (OPS + RT) in high‐risk breast cancer phenotypes, such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive (HER2+) patients. Our aim was to compare the breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) and postoperative surgical complications in OPS + RT compared to PM alone with radiation (PM + RT) and total mastectomy (MTX) without radiotherapy (MTX‐RT).MethodsPatient data were analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified according to the type of surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors of BCSS.ResultsA total of 24 621 patients with high‐risk breast cancer phenotypes were identified, 180 underwent OPS + RT; 13 402, PM + RT; and 11 039 MTX‐RT. OPS + RT was more frequently performed in younger (mean age of 65.53 years, SD: 9.29, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), non‐Hispanic White (90.5% vs. 77.7% vs. 76.3%) and single women (17.9% vs. 12.1% vs. 13.3%). MTX‐RT was usually performed in patients with high histological grade, TNBC, and higher stages. Overall complication rates were higher in the MTX‐RT, compared to OPS + RT and PM + RT, 2%, 1.1%, and 0.7%, respectively, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001. Rates of hematoma and surgical site infections were higher in the MTX‐RT group. With a median follow‐up of 46 months, OPS + RT had better BCSS rates at 5 years compared to PM + RT and MTX‐RT (97.1% vs. 94.7% vs. 89.8%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). MTX‐RT was found to be an independent prognostic factor of worse BCSS compared to OPS + RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.584; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005–7.171), while PM + RT had no difference compared to OPS + RT (HR = 1.670, 95% CI: 0.624–4.469).ConclusionsOPS is a safe breast surgical option in patients with HER2+ and TNBC. Patients with high‐risk phenotypes who underwent OPS + RT and have similar BCSS and complication rates compared to standard breast surgical options. As such, OPS should be considered as an option whenever breast conservation surgery is being discussed.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With Prolonged Operative Times in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Its Association With Short‐Term Outcomes 腹腔镜右半结肠切除术手术时间延长的相关因素及其与短期疗效的关系
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27872
Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Justin Dourado, Giovanna Dasilva, Steven D. Wexner
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate factors associated with prolonged operative time in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy between 2011 and 2021. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with prolonged operative time. The association between longer operative times and complications and hospital stay was assessed.ResultsOne hundred and ninety‐seven patients (52.3% female; mean age: 68.8 ± 14.1 years) were included. Factors independently associated with operative time were male sex (β = 17.3, 95% CI: 2, 32.5; p = 0.026) and extended hemicolectomy (β = 67.7, 95% CI: 27.6, 107.9; p = 0.001). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV classification had a borderline significant association with operative time (β = 100.4, 95% CI: −2.05, 202.9; p = 0.055). Male sex (r = 0.158; p = 0.026), body mass index (r = 0.205; p = 0.004), ASA classification (r = 0.232; p = 0.001), extended hemicolectomy (r = 0.256; p < 0.001), and intracorporeal vessel control (r = 0.161; p = 0.025) had significant positive correlation with operative times. Patients with operative times ≥ 160 min had significantly longer hospital stays (5 vs. 4 days; p = 0.043) and similar complication rates to patients with shorter operative times.ConclusionsMale sex, advanced ASA classification, and extended hemicolectomy were independently and significantly associated with longer operative times in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Longer operative times were associated with longer hospital stays and similar complication rates.
背景本研究旨在调查腹腔镜结肠癌右半结肠切除术手术时间延长的相关因素。方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2011年至2021年间接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的结肠癌患者。进行了线性和二元逻辑回归分析,以确定与手术时间延长相关的因素。结果 共纳入197名患者(52.3%为女性;平均年龄:68.8 ± 14.1岁)。与手术时间独立相关的因素是男性(β = 17.3,95% CI:2,32.5;p = 0.026)和扩大半结肠切除术(β = 67.7,95% CI:27.6,107.9;p = 0.001)。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV 级分类与手术时间(β = 100.4,95% CI:-2.05,202.9;p = 0.055)有边缘显著性关联。男性性别(r = 0.158; p = 0.026)、体重指数(r = 0.205; p = 0.004)、ASA 分级(r = 0.232; p = 0.001)、扩大半结肠切除术(r = 0.256; p < 0.001)和体外血管控制(r = 0.161; p = 0.025)与手术时间呈显著正相关。结论在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中,男性性别、ASA 分级晚期和扩大半结肠切除术与较长的手术时间显著相关。较长的手术时间与较长的住院时间和相似的并发症发生率有关。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Prolonged Operative Times in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Its Association With Short‐Term Outcomes","authors":"Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Justin Dourado, Giovanna Dasilva, Steven D. Wexner","doi":"10.1002/jso.27872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27872","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate factors associated with prolonged operative time in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy between 2011 and 2021. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with prolonged operative time. The association between longer operative times and complications and hospital stay was assessed.ResultsOne hundred and ninety‐seven patients (52.3% female; mean age: 68.8 ± 14.1 years) were included. Factors independently associated with operative time were male sex (<jats:italic>β</jats:italic> = 17.3, 95% CI: 2, 32.5; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.026) and extended hemicolectomy (<jats:italic>β </jats:italic>= 67.7, 95% CI: 27.6, 107.9; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV classification had a borderline significant association with operative time (<jats:italic>β </jats:italic>= 100.4, 95% CI: −2.05, 202.9; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.055). Male sex (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.158; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.026), body mass index (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.205; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004), ASA classification (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.232; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), extended hemicolectomy (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.256; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), and intracorporeal vessel control (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.161; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.025) had significant positive correlation with operative times. Patients with operative times ≥ 160 min had significantly longer hospital stays (5 vs. 4 days; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.043) and similar complication rates to patients with shorter operative times.ConclusionsMale sex, advanced ASA classification, and extended hemicolectomy were independently and significantly associated with longer operative times in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Longer operative times were associated with longer hospital stays and similar complication rates.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Score for Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Curative‐Intent Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma 肝内胆管癌治愈性即时手术患者输血风险预测评分的开发与验证
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27903
Giovanni Catalano, Laura Alaimo, Yutaka Endo, Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou, Andrea Ruzzenente, Luca Aldrighetti, Matthew Weiss, Todd W. Bauer, Sorin Alexandrescu, George A. Poultsides, Shishir K. Maithel, Hugo P. Marques, Guillaume Martel, Carlo Pulitano, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G. Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Minoru Kitago, Timothy M. Pawlik
Background and ObjectivesAmong patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perioperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion is a common complication, yet preoperative identification of patients at risk for transfusion remains challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a preoperative risk score for blood transfusion requirement during surgery for ICC.MethodsPatients undergoing curative‐intent liver surgery for ICC (1990–2020) were identified from a multi‐institutional database. A predictive model was developed and validated. An easy‐to‐use risk calculator was made available online.ResultsAmong 1420 patients, 300 (21.1%) received an intraoperative transfusion. Independent predictors of transfusion included severe preoperative anemia (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10–2.47), T2 category or higher (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.36–3.02), positive lymph nodes (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.32–2.32) and major resection (OR = 2.56, 95%CI 1.85–3.58). Receipt of blood transfusion significantly correlated with worse outcomes. The model showed good discriminative ability in both training (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.66–0.72) and bootstrapping validation (C‐index = 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.70) cohorts. An online risk calculator of blood transfusion requirement was developed (https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/TransfusionRisk).ConclusionsIntraoperative blood transfusion was significantly associated with poor postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for ICC. The identification of patients at high risk of transfusion could improve perioperative patient care and blood resources allocation.
背景和目的在接受肝内胆管癌(ICC)肝切除术的患者中,需要输血的围手术期出血是一种常见的并发症,但术前识别有输血风险的患者仍具有挑战性。本研究的目的是为 ICC 手术中需要输血的患者制定术前风险评分。方法从一个多机构数据库中确定了因 ICC 而接受治愈性肝脏手术的患者(1990-2020 年)。开发并验证了一个预测模型。结果在1420名患者中,有300人(21.1%)接受了术中输血。输血的独立预测因素包括术前严重贫血(OR = 1.65,95% CI 1.10-2.47)、T2 类或以上(OR = 2.00,95% CI 1.36-3.02)、淋巴结阳性(OR = 1.75,95% CI 1.32-2.32)和大部切除(OR = 2.56,95% CI 1.85-3.58)。接受输血与较差的预后明显相关。该模型在训练(AUC = 0.68,95% CI 0.66-0.72)和引导验证(C-指数 = 0.67,95% CI 0.65-0.70)队列中均显示出良好的判别能力。结论在接受 ICC 手术的患者中,术中输血与术后不良预后显著相关。识别输血高风险患者可改善围术期患者护理和血液资源分配。
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Score for Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Curative‐Intent Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Giovanni Catalano, Laura Alaimo, Yutaka Endo, Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou, Andrea Ruzzenente, Luca Aldrighetti, Matthew Weiss, Todd W. Bauer, Sorin Alexandrescu, George A. Poultsides, Shishir K. Maithel, Hugo P. Marques, Guillaume Martel, Carlo Pulitano, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G. Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Minoru Kitago, Timothy M. Pawlik","doi":"10.1002/jso.27903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27903","url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectivesAmong patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perioperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion is a common complication, yet preoperative identification of patients at risk for transfusion remains challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a preoperative risk score for blood transfusion requirement during surgery for ICC.MethodsPatients undergoing curative‐intent liver surgery for ICC (1990–2020) were identified from a multi‐institutional database. A predictive model was developed and validated. An easy‐to‐use risk calculator was made available online.ResultsAmong 1420 patients, 300 (21.1%) received an intraoperative transfusion. Independent predictors of transfusion included severe preoperative anemia (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10–2.47), T2 category or higher (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.36–3.02), positive lymph nodes (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.32–2.32) and major resection (OR = 2.56, 95%CI 1.85–3.58). Receipt of blood transfusion significantly correlated with worse outcomes. The model showed good discriminative ability in both training (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.66–0.72) and bootstrapping validation (C‐index = 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.70) cohorts. An online risk calculator of blood transfusion requirement was developed (<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/TransfusionRisk\">https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/TransfusionRisk</jats:ext-link>).ConclusionsIntraoperative blood transfusion was significantly associated with poor postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for ICC. The identification of patients at high risk of transfusion could improve perioperative patient care and blood resources allocation.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of 2022 PSOGI/RENAPE Consensus on HIPEC 回顾 2022 年 PSOGI/RENAPE 关于重型腹腔镜息肉切除术的共识
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27885
Shigeki Kusamura, Aditi Bhatt, Kurt van Der Speeten, Vahan Kepenekian, Martin Hübner, Clarisse Eveno, Ignace de Hingh, Jean‐Baptiste Delhorme, Abdelkader Taibi, Laurent Villeneuve, Rea Lo Dico, Brendan Moran, Kim Govaerts, Oliver Zivanovic, Donal Brennan, Cedric Nadeau, Willemien Van Driel, Naoual Bakrin, Pompiliu Piso, Victor J. Verwaal, Santiago González‐Moreno, Mohammad Alyami, Olivia Sgarbura, Beate Rau, Marcello Deraco, Olivier Glehen
The 2022 PSOGI (Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International) and RENAPE (French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies) consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was a comprehensive effort aimed at standardizing treatment protocols for various peritoneal malignancies. This initiative is critical due to the wide range of technical variations in HIPEC procedures and the resulting need for standardization to ensure consistent and effective patient care and meaningful audit of multicenter data.
2022 年,国际腹膜表面肿瘤学组(PSOGI)和法国罕见腹膜恶性肿瘤网络(RENAPE)就热疗腹膜内化疗(HIPEC)达成共识,这是一项旨在规范各种腹膜恶性肿瘤治疗方案的综合性工作。这一举措至关重要,因为腹腔内高压化疗程序的技术差异很大,因此需要实现标准化,以确保为患者提供一致、有效的治疗,并对多中心数据进行有意义的审计。
{"title":"Review of 2022 PSOGI/RENAPE Consensus on HIPEC","authors":"Shigeki Kusamura, Aditi Bhatt, Kurt van Der Speeten, Vahan Kepenekian, Martin Hübner, Clarisse Eveno, Ignace de Hingh, Jean‐Baptiste Delhorme, Abdelkader Taibi, Laurent Villeneuve, Rea Lo Dico, Brendan Moran, Kim Govaerts, Oliver Zivanovic, Donal Brennan, Cedric Nadeau, Willemien Van Driel, Naoual Bakrin, Pompiliu Piso, Victor J. Verwaal, Santiago González‐Moreno, Mohammad Alyami, Olivia Sgarbura, Beate Rau, Marcello Deraco, Olivier Glehen","doi":"10.1002/jso.27885","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27885","url":null,"abstract":"The 2022 PSOGI (Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International) and RENAPE (French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies) consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was a comprehensive effort aimed at standardizing treatment protocols for various peritoneal malignancies. This initiative is critical due to the wide range of technical variations in HIPEC procedures and the resulting need for standardization to ensure consistent and effective patient care and meaningful audit of multicenter data.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Postoperative Anastomotic Patency in Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis Using Photoacoustic Imaging. 利用光声成像评估淋巴管-静脉吻合术术后吻合口的通畅性
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27898
Yushi Suzuki, Hiroki Kajita, Marika Otaki, Shiho Watanabe, Hayato Nagashima, Keisuke Okabe, Nobuaki Imanishi, Hisashi Sakuma, Kazuo Kishi

Background and objectives: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a surgical technique used to alleviate lymphedema by bypassing the lymphatic and venous vessels and facilitating lymphatic fluid drainage. Accurate evaluation of anastomotic patency is crucial for assessing LVA outcomes. Traditional near-infrared fluorescence lymphography has limitations, including fluorescence diffusion in subcutaneous fat and difficulty evaluating areas beneath the dermal backflow. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a potential alternative for high-resolution visualization of lymphatic and blood vessels. We aimed to evaluate the utility of PAI for assessing LVA patency.

Methods: Using the LUB0 PAI system, we examined patients who underwent LVA. Imaging was conducted using subcutaneously injected indocyanine green (ICG) to visualize lymphatic vessels.

Results: Results showed clear patency in some cases, inability to evaluate it in others, and confirmed occlusion in certain instances.

Conclusions: While PAI provides valuable insights, challenges remain, including the potential for ambiguous results from the intermittent nature of lymphatic flow and difficulty visualizing low-ICG-concentration lymphatic vessels. Nonetheless, PAI offers a promising method for detailed 3D evaluation of anastomoses. It may improve surgical outcomes and contribute to future evidence in the field. Further advancements, including real-time video assessment, may enhance the accuracy and reliability of LVA patency evaluation.

背景和目的:淋巴管-静脉吻合术(LVA)是一种通过绕过淋巴管和静脉血管并促进淋巴液引流来缓解淋巴水肿的外科技术。准确评估吻合口的通畅性对于评估 LVA 的效果至关重要。传统的近红外荧光淋巴造影术存在局限性,包括荧光在皮下脂肪中的扩散以及难以评估真皮回流下方的区域。光声成像(PAI)是淋巴和血管高分辨率可视化的潜在替代方法。我们的目的是评估 PAI 在评估 LVA 通畅性方面的实用性:我们使用 LUB0 PAI 系统对接受 LVA 的患者进行了检查。使用皮下注射的吲哚菁绿(ICG)进行成像,以观察淋巴管:结果显示,一些病例的淋巴管通畅,而另一些病例则无法评估通畅情况,某些病例的淋巴管还被证实闭塞:结论:虽然 PAI 提供了有价值的见解,但仍存在挑战,包括淋巴流动的间歇性可能导致结果不明确,以及难以观察低 ICG 浓度的淋巴管。尽管如此,PAI 还是为吻合口的详细三维评估提供了一种很有前景的方法。它可以改善手术效果,并为该领域的未来证据做出贡献。包括实时视频评估在内的进一步发展可能会提高 LVA 通畅性评估的准确性和可靠性。
{"title":"Evaluation of Postoperative Anastomotic Patency in Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis Using Photoacoustic Imaging.","authors":"Yushi Suzuki, Hiroki Kajita, Marika Otaki, Shiho Watanabe, Hayato Nagashima, Keisuke Okabe, Nobuaki Imanishi, Hisashi Sakuma, Kazuo Kishi","doi":"10.1002/jso.27898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a surgical technique used to alleviate lymphedema by bypassing the lymphatic and venous vessels and facilitating lymphatic fluid drainage. Accurate evaluation of anastomotic patency is crucial for assessing LVA outcomes. Traditional near-infrared fluorescence lymphography has limitations, including fluorescence diffusion in subcutaneous fat and difficulty evaluating areas beneath the dermal backflow. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a potential alternative for high-resolution visualization of lymphatic and blood vessels. We aimed to evaluate the utility of PAI for assessing LVA patency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the LUB0 PAI system, we examined patients who underwent LVA. Imaging was conducted using subcutaneously injected indocyanine green (ICG) to visualize lymphatic vessels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed clear patency in some cases, inability to evaluate it in others, and confirmed occlusion in certain instances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While PAI provides valuable insights, challenges remain, including the potential for ambiguous results from the intermittent nature of lymphatic flow and difficulty visualizing low-ICG-concentration lymphatic vessels. Nonetheless, PAI offers a promising method for detailed 3D evaluation of anastomoses. It may improve surgical outcomes and contribute to future evidence in the field. Further advancements, including real-time video assessment, may enhance the accuracy and reliability of LVA patency evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Retroperitoneal Paraganglioma and Associated Prognostic Factors. 评论腹膜后副神经节瘤的临床和病理特征及相关预后因素分析
IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27905
Hua Zhao, Jiayue Xu, Yuejun Zhou
{"title":"Comment on: Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Retroperitoneal Paraganglioma and Associated Prognostic Factors.","authors":"Hua Zhao, Jiayue Xu, Yuejun Zhou","doi":"10.1002/jso.27905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27905","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: “Liver Resection Is Superior to Tumor Ablation in Patients With Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma” 评论"多灶性肝细胞癌患者的肝切除术优于肿瘤消融术
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27887
You‐Fei Wei, Yin‐Feng Xu
{"title":"Comment on: “Liver Resection Is Superior to Tumor Ablation in Patients With Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma”","authors":"You‐Fei Wei, Yin‐Feng Xu","doi":"10.1002/jso.27887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27887","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142184593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study. 既往腹部手术和腹膜转移时间对影像学预测手术 PCI 准确性的影响:PRECINCT 研究报告。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27868
Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,David Morris,Daniel Labow,Armando Sardi,Paolo Sammartino,Olivier Glehen,
BACKGROUND AND AIMIn this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied.METHODSThe rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS).RESULTSIn 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS.CONCLUSIONSThe rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.
背景和目的在这项前瞻性、观察性 PRECINCT(常见和不常见腹膜肿瘤的腹膜扩散模式和对全身化疗的反应)研究的第一阶段报告中,对放射学 PCI(腹膜癌指数;rPCI)和手术 PCI(sPCI)进行了相关性分析。方法rPCI和sPCI如果相差≤3点,则被视为 "相同"。采用布兰-阿尔特曼分析法评估两者的一致性,并采用一致性相关系数(CCC)评估两者的一致性强度。结果 在 707 名(79.4%)患者中,280 名(39.6%)患者的 rPCI 和 sPCI 一致。在 Bland-Altman 分析中,< 40% 的患者处于可接受差异的 ±3 PCI 点范围内。两个评分之间的平均差异为 4.5 分(95% CI- -5.16~-3.92)。整个队列的 CCC- 为 0.59("中等 "一致性),不受成像方式、PM 或 PSS 时间的影响。腹膜磁共振成像在接受迭代手术患者中的作用以及根据复发部位进行成像的性能需要进一步评估。
{"title":"Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study.","authors":"Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,David Morris,Daniel Labow,Armando Sardi,Paolo Sammartino,Olivier Glehen,","doi":"10.1002/jso.27868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27868","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMIn this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied.METHODSThe rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS).RESULTSIn 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS.CONCLUSIONSThe rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142184603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Surgical Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1