Pub Date : 2026-01-31Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-154
Shahzaib Riaz Baloch, Kenny Kwan, Graham Ka-Hon Shea
Background: Os odontoideum is a rare craniocervical osseous anomaly leading to instability and cord compression that may require surgical stabilization. The increased precision and expedited workflow from visible light navigation allows for C1 lateral mass screw placement through the posterior arch while reducing dissection and venous bleeding compared to traditional entry at the arch-lateral mass junction.
Case description: A 57-year-old male presented with progressive myelopathy due to os odontoideum and C1/2 instability. Posterior C1-C2 fusion was performed via C1 through-the-arch screws and bilateral C2 laminar screws, with the assistance of visible light navigation (7D FLASH Navigation). Five weeks postoperatively, he developed progressive right arm pain and weakness. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) demonstrated the lateral mass screws to be in situ, but there were bilateral C2 laminar fractures with screw loosening and cord impingement, requiring urgent screw removal with extension of fusion down to C4. Evaluation of the preoperative CT revealed unusually narrow C2 laminar width (3.2-3.4 mm). We posit that cyclic stress may have led to fatigue failure, although the initial C2 navigated screw placement was accurate.
Conclusions: This is the first report of visible light navigation being used for posterior C1/C2 fixation. Navigation, however, cannot compensate for inadequate bony dimensions for screw placement with risk of subsequent mechanical failure. C2 lamina width should be evaluated prior to consideration of laminar screw insertion.
{"title":"Visible light navigation for C1/C2 fixation and a rare complication related to C2 lamina fracture: case report.","authors":"Shahzaib Riaz Baloch, Kenny Kwan, Graham Ka-Hon Shea","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-154","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Os odontoideum is a rare craniocervical osseous anomaly leading to instability and cord compression that may require surgical stabilization. The increased precision and expedited workflow from visible light navigation allows for C1 lateral mass screw placement through the posterior arch while reducing dissection and venous bleeding compared to traditional entry at the arch-lateral mass junction.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 57-year-old male presented with progressive myelopathy due to os odontoideum and C1/2 instability. Posterior C1-C2 fusion was performed via C1 through-the-arch screws and bilateral C2 laminar screws, with the assistance of visible light navigation (7D FLASH Navigation). Five weeks postoperatively, he developed progressive right arm pain and weakness. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) demonstrated the lateral mass screws to be <i>in situ</i>, but there were bilateral C2 laminar fractures with screw loosening and cord impingement, requiring urgent screw removal with extension of fusion down to C4. Evaluation of the preoperative CT revealed unusually narrow C2 laminar width (3.2-3.4 mm). We posit that cyclic stress may have led to fatigue failure, although the initial C2 navigated screw placement was accurate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report of visible light navigation being used for posterior C1/C2 fixation. Navigation, however, cannot compensate for inadequate bony dimensions for screw placement with risk of subsequent mechanical failure. C2 lamina width should be evaluated prior to consideration of laminar screw insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-181
Chul Gie Hong, Woo Dong Nam, Yerang Jeong
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the standard treatment for single-level cervical myelopathy with anterior compression. However, concomitant posterior pathology such as ligamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy may limit decompression or cause iatrogenic LF buckling after surgery. This case series highlights surgical considerations and technical modifications for such scenarios.
Case description: Four patients with single-level cervical myelopathy underwent ACDF. Case 1: a 68-year-old man with C3/4 disc herniation and LF hypertrophy was treated with short-plate fixation and high-angle screws, achieving indirect posterior decompression and neurological recovery. Case 2: an 80-year-old woman with C3/4 compression achieved excellent clinical and radiologic outcomes after ACDF. Case 3: a 58-year-old woman with OPLL developed postoperative LF buckling after conventional ACDF method. Case 4: a 77-year-old man with rigid segmental motion failed indirect decompression after ACDF and required staged posterior laminectomy.
Conclusions: ACDF is effective for most single-level myelopathy with anterior compression. Technical modifications, including short anterior plating with high-angle screws, may achieve indirect posterior decompression and prevent LF buckling. In rigid segments or with severe posterior pathology, combined or staged anterior-posterior approaches should be considered. Careful selection and meticulous technique are essential to optimize outcomes.
{"title":"Is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion sufficient for single-level cervical myelopathy: surgical considerations for combined anterior and posterior cervical cord compression-experience from a case series.","authors":"Chul Gie Hong, Woo Dong Nam, Yerang Jeong","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-181","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the standard treatment for single-level cervical myelopathy with anterior compression. However, concomitant posterior pathology such as ligamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy may limit decompression or cause iatrogenic LF buckling after surgery. This case series highlights surgical considerations and technical modifications for such scenarios.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Four patients with single-level cervical myelopathy underwent ACDF. Case 1: a 68-year-old man with C3/4 disc herniation and LF hypertrophy was treated with short-plate fixation and high-angle screws, achieving indirect posterior decompression and neurological recovery. Case 2: an 80-year-old woman with C3/4 compression achieved excellent clinical and radiologic outcomes after ACDF. Case 3: a 58-year-old woman with OPLL developed postoperative LF buckling after conventional ACDF method. Case 4: a 77-year-old man with rigid segmental motion failed indirect decompression after ACDF and required staged posterior laminectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACDF is effective for most single-level myelopathy with anterior compression. Technical modifications, including short anterior plating with high-angle screws, may achieve indirect posterior decompression and prevent LF buckling. In rigid segments or with severe posterior pathology, combined or staged anterior-posterior approaches should be considered. Careful selection and meticulous technique are essential to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.21037/jss-2025-aw-183
John I Williams, Pierce Nunley, Stacie Tran, Marcus Stone
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common surgical procedure for treating degenerative discs in the lumbar spine. The popularity of ALIF continues to rise due to favorable reported outcomes, leading to the introduction of the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach, which yields similar outcomes with less morbidity. Designs of cages are also evolving to improve fusion rate and optimize clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the performance and safety of SPIRA cages (Camber Spine Technologies, King of Prussia, PA, USA), which are designed and constructed using a novel patented three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium open-arch architecture design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, ambispective study of consecutive patients previously treated with lumbar open-arch cages at L4-5 and/or L5-S1, with or without supplemental fixation. Prospective lumbar computed tomography (CT) scan at minimum 12 months postoperatively was used to define the primary study objectives, interbody fusion, and implant subsidence. The secondary objectives were to evaluate safety from the retrospective medical data, including adverse events (AEs) related to the device or procedure and any consequential follow-up operations/revisions. Study inclusion criteria selected patients with intractable back and/or leg pain having clinical and radiological evidence of lumbar degenerative disc at L4-5 and/or L5-S1 who failed 6 months of conservative treatment and had OLIF or ALIF surgeries from an oblique approach. The patients were at least 18 years of age and were able to provide informed consent to participate per study protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 subjects with 39 L4-5 and/or L5-S1 levels were included in the study. The cohort had a mean age of 57 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and they were 60.6% female. All of the subjects had at least one comorbidity, and 78.8% (26/33) of subjects presented with two or more. Considering levels treated, L4-5 and L5-S1 were 43.6% (17/39) and 56.4% (22/39), respectively. The mean follow-up was 30 months. The interbody fusion rate was 97.44% and the occurrence of implant subsidence was 12.82% in the treated levels. There were no device-related complications reported, and a third of subjects experienced probable or direct procedure-related complications. The revision rate at the index level was 9.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons have many options when selecting an interbody cage for treating a degenerative disc. While surgical technique is fundamental to interbody fusion efficacy and safety, the cage design has been shown to influence these factors since the cage design itself can promote bone growth and reduce the risk of subsidence. The current study reporting fusion and subsidence rates for the open-arch designed cages supports this novel design's efficacy and safety. The results of this study suppor
背景:前路腰椎椎体间融合术(ALIF)是治疗腰椎退变性椎间盘的常用手术方法。由于良好的预后报道,ALIF的受欢迎程度继续上升,导致引入斜腰椎椎体间融合术(OLIF)入路,其结果相似,发病率更低。笼的设计也在不断发展,以提高融合率和优化临床结果。本研究旨在评估SPIRA笼(Camber Spine Technologies, King of Prussia, PA, USA)的性能和安全性,该笼采用新颖的专利三维(3D)打印钛开拱结构设计进行设计和制造。方法:这是一项单中心、双视角研究,连续患者先前在L4-5和/或L5-S1腰椎开弓笼治疗,有或没有补充固定。术后至少12个月的前瞻性腰椎计算机断层扫描(CT)用于确定主要研究目标、椎体间融合和植入物下沉。次要目标是根据回顾性医疗数据评估安全性,包括与设备或程序相关的不良事件(ae)以及任何后续的随访操作/修改。研究纳入标准选择了顽固性腰痛和/或腿痛患者,这些患者有临床和放射学证据表明腰4-5和/或腰5- s1处的腰椎间盘退变,保守治疗失败6个月,并从斜入路行OLIF或ALIF手术。患者至少年满18岁,并且能够提供参与每个研究方案的知情同意。结果:共纳入33名受试者,L4-5和/或L5-S1水平为39个。该队列的平均年龄为57岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为32 kg/m2,女性占60.6%。所有受试者至少有一种合并症,78.8%(26/33)的受试者出现两种或两种以上合并症。考虑治疗水平,L4-5和L5-S1分别为43.6%(17/39)和56.4%(22/39)。平均随访时间为30个月。治疗水平体间融合率为97.44%,种植体下陷率为12.82%。没有器械相关并发症的报道,三分之一的受试者经历了可能的或直接的手术相关并发症。指数水平的修正率为9.0%。结论:外科医生在选择椎间保持器治疗退变性椎间盘时有多种选择。虽然手术技术是椎体间融合疗效和安全性的基础,但由于笼设计本身可以促进骨生长并降低下沉风险,因此笼设计已被证明会影响这些因素。目前研究报告的融合和沉降率的开放式拱设计笼支持这种新设计的有效性和安全性。本研究的结果支持了开放式弓笼设计的有效性,该设计的重点是促进体间融合,在保持种植体安全的同时最大限度地减少下沉。
{"title":"Ambispective study of fusion and subsidence in degenerated L4-5/L5-S1 discs treated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion/anterior lumbar interbody fusion using 3D-printed titanium open arch cages.","authors":"John I Williams, Pierce Nunley, Stacie Tran, Marcus Stone","doi":"10.21037/jss-2025-aw-183","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-2025-aw-183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common surgical procedure for treating degenerative discs in the lumbar spine. The popularity of ALIF continues to rise due to favorable reported outcomes, leading to the introduction of the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach, which yields similar outcomes with less morbidity. Designs of cages are also evolving to improve fusion rate and optimize clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the performance and safety of SPIRA cages (Camber Spine Technologies, King of Prussia, PA, USA), which are designed and constructed using a novel patented three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium open-arch architecture design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, ambispective study of consecutive patients previously treated with lumbar open-arch cages at L4-5 and/or L5-S1, with or without supplemental fixation. Prospective lumbar computed tomography (CT) scan at minimum 12 months postoperatively was used to define the primary study objectives, interbody fusion, and implant subsidence. The secondary objectives were to evaluate safety from the retrospective medical data, including adverse events (AEs) related to the device or procedure and any consequential follow-up operations/revisions. Study inclusion criteria selected patients with intractable back and/or leg pain having clinical and radiological evidence of lumbar degenerative disc at L4-5 and/or L5-S1 who failed 6 months of conservative treatment and had OLIF or ALIF surgeries from an oblique approach. The patients were at least 18 years of age and were able to provide informed consent to participate per study protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 subjects with 39 L4-5 and/or L5-S1 levels were included in the study. The cohort had a mean age of 57 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and they were 60.6% female. All of the subjects had at least one comorbidity, and 78.8% (26/33) of subjects presented with two or more. Considering levels treated, L4-5 and L5-S1 were 43.6% (17/39) and 56.4% (22/39), respectively. The mean follow-up was 30 months. The interbody fusion rate was 97.44% and the occurrence of implant subsidence was 12.82% in the treated levels. There were no device-related complications reported, and a third of subjects experienced probable or direct procedure-related complications. The revision rate at the index level was 9.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons have many options when selecting an interbody cage for treating a degenerative disc. While surgical technique is fundamental to interbody fusion efficacy and safety, the cage design has been shown to influence these factors since the cage design itself can promote bone growth and reduce the risk of subsidence. The current study reporting fusion and subsidence rates for the open-arch designed cages supports this novel design's efficacy and safety. The results of this study suppor","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-168
Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Vidhi Bhatt, Husain Shakil, Armaan K Malhotra, Christopher S Lozano, Ahmad Essa, Jefferson R Wilson, Christopher D Witiw, Jetan H Badhiwala
Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a catastrophic condition associated with significant morbidity and healthcare utilization. While existing literature has largely focused on long-term sequelae, data on temporal trends in early in-hospital and immobility-related complications are limited. This study aims to evaluate temporal trends in major in-hospital and immobility-related adverse events among patients with acute traumatic SCI.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) from 2017 to 2022. Patients aged 16 years and older with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar SCI were included. The primary outcome was major adverse events (MAEs), including cardiac arrest, stroke, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and immobility-associated events (IAEs) such as surgical site infection, venous thromboemblism (VTE), pressure ulcers, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The primary exposure was calendar year of hospital admission. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between calendar year and complications. Subgroup analyses stratified by spinal level and by patients undergoing surgery.
Results: A total of 78,571 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 51.8 years; 75% male). Over the study period, patient age and comorbidity burden increased. The adjusted odds of several MAE increased, including cardiac arrest [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, per year after 2017, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.09], stroke (OR 1.08, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15), unplanned ICU admission (OR 1.07, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09), intubation (OR 1.04, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06), and unplanned return to the operating room (OR 1.21, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.17-1.26). Among IAE, the odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and pressure ulcers rose, while CAUTI rates declined (OR 0.89, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93). Subgroup analyses by injury level and among surgically treated patients demonstrated similar temporal patterns. In multivariable models, higher odds of both MAE and IAE were independently associated with increasing year of admission, older age, greater comorbidity burden, complete SCI, fractures, penetrating trauma and lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of patients with traumatic SCI, the incidence of several MAE and IAE increased over time. These findings suggest a need for heightened vigilance, enhanced perioperative care, and the development of standardized prevention protocols targeting high-risk populations.
{"title":"Temporal trends in major in-hospital and immobility-related complications following traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Vidhi Bhatt, Husain Shakil, Armaan K Malhotra, Christopher S Lozano, Ahmad Essa, Jefferson R Wilson, Christopher D Witiw, Jetan H Badhiwala","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-168","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a catastrophic condition associated with significant morbidity and healthcare utilization. While existing literature has largely focused on long-term sequelae, data on temporal trends in early in-hospital and immobility-related complications are limited. This study aims to evaluate temporal trends in major in-hospital and immobility-related adverse events among patients with acute traumatic SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) from 2017 to 2022. Patients aged 16 years and older with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar SCI were included. The primary outcome was major adverse events (MAEs), including cardiac arrest, stroke, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and immobility-associated events (IAEs) such as surgical site infection, venous thromboemblism (VTE), pressure ulcers, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The primary exposure was calendar year of hospital admission. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between calendar year and complications. Subgroup analyses stratified by spinal level and by patients undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78,571 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 51.8 years; 75% male). Over the study period, patient age and comorbidity burden increased. The adjusted odds of several MAE increased, including cardiac arrest [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, per year after 2017, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.09], stroke (OR 1.08, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15), unplanned ICU admission (OR 1.07, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09), intubation (OR 1.04, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06), and unplanned return to the operating room (OR 1.21, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 1.17-1.26). Among IAE, the odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and pressure ulcers rose, while CAUTI rates declined (OR 0.89, per year after 2017, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93). Subgroup analyses by injury level and among surgically treated patients demonstrated similar temporal patterns. In multivariable models, higher odds of both MAE and IAE were independently associated with increasing year of admission, older age, greater comorbidity burden, complete SCI, fractures, penetrating trauma and lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this contemporary cohort of patients with traumatic SCI, the incidence of several MAE and IAE increased over time. These findings suggest a need for heightened vigilance, enhanced perioperative care, and the development of standardized prevention protocols targeting high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31Epub Date: 2025-10-30DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-85
David Shin, Brandon Shin, Chandler Dinh, Daniel Im, Timothy Tang, Stephen Cho, Zachary Brandt, Kai Nguyen, Mark Oliinik, Ethan Purnell, Patricia Carlson, Alexa Johnson, Davis Carter, Jacob Razzouk, Taha M Taka, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Wayne Cheng, Olumide Danisa
Background: Quantitative parameters for the diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for congenital stenosis of lumbar neuroforaminal dimensions (LNFD) using computed tomography (CT), assessing the influences of patient sex, race, and ethnicity.
Methods: Measurements of LNFD were performed on CT scans from 1,000 patients aged 18-35 years without spinal pathology.
Results: Irrespective of vertebral level, mean anatomic LNFD measurements were as follows: 8.66±2.1 and 8.76±3.14 mm for left and right widths, 17.76±2.74 and 17.7±3.26 mm for left and right heights, and 133.12±34.72 and 133.4±33.86 mm2 for left and right areas. Threshold values for neuroforaminal stenosis, regardless of vertebral level, were: 4.46 and 2.48 mm for left and right foraminal widths, 12.28 and 11.18 mm for left and right foraminal heights, and 63.68 and 65.68 mm2 for left and right foraminal areas. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity highlighted significant findings per vertebral level, but not when considered irrespective of vertebral level.
Conclusions: This study reports measurements of LNFD via CT of 1,000 patients to establish quantitative thresholds for diagnosis of neuroforaminal stenosis. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity highlighted significant findings per vertebral level, but not irrespective of vertebral level. These findings may help solidify anatomic thresholds of foraminal stenosis via radiographic imaging and establish the foundation for future research on the diagnosis of lumbar neuroforaminal stenosis.
{"title":"A CT-based radiographic analysis of parameters of congenital lumbar neuroforaminal stenosis.","authors":"David Shin, Brandon Shin, Chandler Dinh, Daniel Im, Timothy Tang, Stephen Cho, Zachary Brandt, Kai Nguyen, Mark Oliinik, Ethan Purnell, Patricia Carlson, Alexa Johnson, Davis Carter, Jacob Razzouk, Taha M Taka, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Wayne Cheng, Olumide Danisa","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-85","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-85","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative parameters for the diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for congenital stenosis of lumbar neuroforaminal dimensions (LNFD) using computed tomography (CT), assessing the influences of patient sex, race, and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements of LNFD were performed on CT scans from 1,000 patients aged 18-35 years without spinal pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of vertebral level, mean anatomic LNFD measurements were as follows: 8.66±2.1 and 8.76±3.14 mm for left and right widths, 17.76±2.74 and 17.7±3.26 mm for left and right heights, and 133.12±34.72 and 133.4±33.86 mm<sup>2</sup> for left and right areas. Threshold values for neuroforaminal stenosis, regardless of vertebral level, were: 4.46 and 2.48 mm for left and right foraminal widths, 12.28 and 11.18 mm for left and right foraminal heights, and 63.68 and 65.68 mm<sup>2</sup> for left and right foraminal areas. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity highlighted significant findings per vertebral level, but not when considered irrespective of vertebral level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reports measurements of LNFD via CT of 1,000 patients to establish quantitative thresholds for diagnosis of neuroforaminal stenosis. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity highlighted significant findings per vertebral level, but not irrespective of vertebral level. These findings may help solidify anatomic thresholds of foraminal stenosis via radiographic imaging and establish the foundation for future research on the diagnosis of lumbar neuroforaminal stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"874-886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) often presents with coronal malalignment due to lumbosacral fractional (LSF) curve deformity. While apical vertebral rotation (AVR) has been recognized as a contributor to spinal deformity, its relationship with global coronal alignment correction remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between AVR at the LSF curve and global coronal alignment in DLS patients, both pre- and post-operatively.
Methods: This retrospective study included 144 patients with DLS who underwent spinal fusion surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic software was used to assess coronal balance distance (CBD), fractional apical vertebral rotation (fAVR), spinopelvic parameters, Cobb angles, and L4/L5 tilt angles. Coronal malalignment was categorized, and change in fAVR (ΔfAVR) were analyzed for correlation with changes in global coronal alignment. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on pelvic incidence (PI) and Bao classification (types A, B, and C).
Results: A significant correlation was found between ΔfAVR and improvement in coronal alignment (r=0.6; P<0.05), with moderate correlations with coronal Cobb angle (r=0.51), L4 tilt (r=0.417), and L5 tilt (r=0.403) (P<0.05 for all). Subgroup analysis revealed a strong correlation in patients with low PI and moderate correlation in high PI patients. By Bao classification, the correlation between ΔfAVR and global coronal alignment was strongest in type C (r=0.87), followed by type B (r=0.656) and type A (r=0.506; P<0.05).
Conclusions: AVR at the LSF curve significantly contributes to the improvement of global coronal alignment in DLS. Axial alignment correction plays a foundational role in restoring coronal balance, emphasizing the importance of precise surgical strategies for matching lumbosacral and lumbar/thoracolumbar curves.
{"title":"The apical vertebral rotational correction of the lumbosacral fractional curve: implications for coronal alignment in degenerative lumbar scoliosis.","authors":"Chaisiri Chaichankul, Peem Sarasombath, Yoddoi Suwansri, Teerawat Pansrestee, Chaiyos Chaichankul, Pawin Gajaseni","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-152","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) often presents with coronal malalignment due to lumbosacral fractional (LSF) curve deformity. While apical vertebral rotation (AVR) has been recognized as a contributor to spinal deformity, its relationship with global coronal alignment correction remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between AVR at the LSF curve and global coronal alignment in DLS patients, both pre- and post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 144 patients with DLS who underwent spinal fusion surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic software was used to assess coronal balance distance (CBD), fractional apical vertebral rotation (fAVR), spinopelvic parameters, Cobb angles, and L4/L5 tilt angles. Coronal malalignment was categorized, and change in fAVR (ΔfAVR) were analyzed for correlation with changes in global coronal alignment. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on pelvic incidence (PI) and Bao classification (types A, B, and C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant correlation was found between ΔfAVR and improvement in coronal alignment (r=0.6; P<0.05), with moderate correlations with coronal Cobb angle (r=0.51), L4 tilt (r=0.417), and L5 tilt (r=0.403) (P<0.05 for all). Subgroup analysis revealed a strong correlation in patients with low PI and moderate correlation in high PI patients. By Bao classification, the correlation between ΔfAVR and global coronal alignment was strongest in type C (r=0.87), followed by type B (r=0.656) and type A (r=0.506; P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AVR at the LSF curve significantly contributes to the improvement of global coronal alignment in DLS. Axial alignment correction plays a foundational role in restoring coronal balance, emphasizing the importance of precise surgical strategies for matching lumbosacral and lumbar/thoracolumbar curves.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"989-997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-102
Lucas K Dziesinski, Ryan T Halvorson, Meredith Langhorst, William R Klemme, Sigurd H Berven, Virginie Lafage, Frank Schwab, Jeffrey C Lotz, Abel Torres-Espin, Jeannie F Bailey
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multifidus muscle may be reflexively inhibited by painful co-existing structural degenerative features, affecting spinal loading and control in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of lumbar spine degeneration and their influence on clinical outcomes of multifidi neurostimulation for cLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of an implantable neurostimulator targeting the L2 dorsal rami medial branch nerves innervating the deep multifidi in 204 subjects. Degenerative anatomical features of the lumbar discs, vertebrae, facets, and paraspinal muscles were graded using standardized criteria. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L), were collected at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc pairwise <i>t</i>-tests were performed to evaluate changes in outcomes in relation to individual demographic variables and MRI features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included 204 subjects [110 females, 94 males; age: mean ± standard deviation (SD) =47±9 years; body mass index (BMI): mean ± SD =28±4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] at baseline had, on average, cLBP for 14±11 years, average VAS of 7.3±0.7 cm, ODI of 39.1±10.3 points, EQ-5D-5L of 0.585±0.174, and mean percentage of days with cLBP in the year before enrollment was 97%±8%. In comparing PRO responses with MRI features, there was no significant finding (P>0.05) explaining improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life for subjects with multifidus atrophy and fatty infiltration, facet arthropathy, disc herniation, annular tears, Modic changes, or lumbar degenerative disc disease. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed statistically significant pre- to post-implantation differences for VAS and ODI for patients with stable, grade I spondylolisthesis (P=0.009, n<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.031 and P=0.040, n<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.021). Differences for those with stable, grade I spondylolisthesis were statistically significant and clinically relevant at 12 months in VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D-5L (P=0.006, P=0.040, P<0.001; Cohen's d =0.539, d =0.396, d =-0.689) and these comparative improvements remained significant for ODI and EQ-5D-5L at 24 months (P=0.03 and P=0.02; Cohen's d =0.420, d =-0.441).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that, in a population of cLBP patients, existing lumbar spinal degeneration did not influence the effect of the neurostimulation therapy on PROs. Thus, the presence of mild and moderate lumbar spinal degeneration does not appear to be a contraindication for implantable multifidus neurostimulation, including patients with grade I spondylolisth
{"title":"The effect of baseline spinal magnetic resonance imaging features on restorative neurostimulation efficacy in patients with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Lucas K Dziesinski, Ryan T Halvorson, Meredith Langhorst, William R Klemme, Sigurd H Berven, Virginie Lafage, Frank Schwab, Jeffrey C Lotz, Abel Torres-Espin, Jeannie F Bailey","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-102","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multifidus muscle may be reflexively inhibited by painful co-existing structural degenerative features, affecting spinal loading and control in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of lumbar spine degeneration and their influence on clinical outcomes of multifidi neurostimulation for cLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of an implantable neurostimulator targeting the L2 dorsal rami medial branch nerves innervating the deep multifidi in 204 subjects. Degenerative anatomical features of the lumbar discs, vertebrae, facets, and paraspinal muscles were graded using standardized criteria. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L), were collected at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc pairwise <i>t</i>-tests were performed to evaluate changes in outcomes in relation to individual demographic variables and MRI features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included 204 subjects [110 females, 94 males; age: mean ± standard deviation (SD) =47±9 years; body mass index (BMI): mean ± SD =28±4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] at baseline had, on average, cLBP for 14±11 years, average VAS of 7.3±0.7 cm, ODI of 39.1±10.3 points, EQ-5D-5L of 0.585±0.174, and mean percentage of days with cLBP in the year before enrollment was 97%±8%. In comparing PRO responses with MRI features, there was no significant finding (P>0.05) explaining improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life for subjects with multifidus atrophy and fatty infiltration, facet arthropathy, disc herniation, annular tears, Modic changes, or lumbar degenerative disc disease. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed statistically significant pre- to post-implantation differences for VAS and ODI for patients with stable, grade I spondylolisthesis (P=0.009, n<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.031 and P=0.040, n<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.021). Differences for those with stable, grade I spondylolisthesis were statistically significant and clinically relevant at 12 months in VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D-5L (P=0.006, P=0.040, P<0.001; Cohen's d =0.539, d =0.396, d =-0.689) and these comparative improvements remained significant for ODI and EQ-5D-5L at 24 months (P=0.03 and P=0.02; Cohen's d =0.420, d =-0.441).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that, in a population of cLBP patients, existing lumbar spinal degeneration did not influence the effect of the neurostimulation therapy on PROs. Thus, the presence of mild and moderate lumbar spinal degeneration does not appear to be a contraindication for implantable multifidus neurostimulation, including patients with grade I spondylolisth","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"861-873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-78
Nedunchezhiyan Govindasamy, Lei Jiang, Jia Wei Tan, Wei Kiong Cheong
Background: Escherichia coli (E. coli)-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) (NOVOSIS®, CGbio, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) is increasingly used in selected spinal fusion surgeries to promote bony fusion between vertebrae. Older formulations of rhBMP-2 have been associated with various complications, including vertebral endplate osteolysis, which can complicate the diagnosis and management of postoperative patients. We present the first reported case of vertebral endplate osteolysis associated with E. coli-derived rhBMP-2 using the NOVOSIS® carrier.
Case description: A 54-year-old man who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Initially treated for delayed onset postsurgical spondylodiscitis, the diagnosis of rhBMP-2 induced vertebral endplate osteolysis was only established after clinical and radiological reassessment. The patient presented with non-specific lower back pain 3 months after surgery. Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed single-level intradiscal fluid with adjacent endplate erosions, mild disc cage subsidence, marrow edema, and a rim-enhancing fluid collection. Biochemical markers were not convincing for spondylodiscitis and blood cultures were negative. Nonetheless, he was treated empirically with oral antibiotics. The patient showed significant improvement 3 weeks after the initial diagnosis was made, with subsequent imaging findings demonstrating the development of endplate osteolysis and implant subsidence.
Conclusions: This case demonstrates the difficulty in diagnosing rhBMP-2 induced endplate osteolysis as it mimics spondylodiscitis on imaging. Clinicians should consider this complication as a differential diagnosis to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatment and to improve postoperative monitoring protocols, even with newer rhBMP-2 formulations.
背景:大肠杆菌(E. coli)衍生的重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2 (rhBMP-2) (NOVOSIS®,CGbio, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea)越来越多地用于脊柱融合手术,以促进椎骨之间的骨融合。老配方的rhBMP-2与各种并发症有关,包括椎体终板骨溶解,这可能使术后患者的诊断和治疗复杂化。我们报道了首例使用NOVOSIS®载体与大肠杆菌衍生的rhBMP-2相关的椎体终板骨溶解病例。病例描述:一名54岁男性接受腰椎融合手术。最初治疗延迟性术后脊柱炎,rhBMP-2诱导椎体终板骨溶解的诊断仅在临床和放射学重新评估后才确定。患者术后3个月出现非特异性腰痛。最初的磁共振成像(MRI)显示单节段椎间盘内积液伴临近终板侵蚀,轻度椎间盘笼下沉,骨髓水肿和边缘增强积液。生物化学指标不能令人信服的脊椎炎和血培养是阴性的。尽管如此,他还是经验性地接受了口服抗生素治疗。患者在初步诊断后3周表现出明显改善,随后的影像学结果显示终板骨溶解和植入物下沉。结论:本病例显示诊断rhBMP-2诱导终板骨溶解的困难,因为它在影像学上类似于脊椎椎间盘炎。临床医生应将此并发症视为鉴别诊断,以避免不必要的抗生素治疗,并改进术后监测方案,即使使用较新的rhBMP-2配方。
{"title":"Navigating diagnostic challenges: <i>E. coli</i>-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) induced endplate osteolysis and delayed spondylodiscitis: a case report.","authors":"Nedunchezhiyan Govindasamy, Lei Jiang, Jia Wei Tan, Wei Kiong Cheong","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-78","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-78","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Escherichia coli (<i>E. coli</i>)-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) (NOVOSIS<sup>®</sup>, CGbio, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) is increasingly used in selected spinal fusion surgeries to promote bony fusion between vertebrae. Older formulations of rhBMP-2 have been associated with various complications, including vertebral endplate osteolysis, which can complicate the diagnosis and management of postoperative patients. We present the first reported case of vertebral endplate osteolysis associated with <i>E. coli</i>-derived rhBMP-2 using the NOVOSIS<sup>®</sup> carrier.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 54-year-old man who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Initially treated for delayed onset postsurgical spondylodiscitis, the diagnosis of rhBMP-2 induced vertebral endplate osteolysis was only established after clinical and radiological reassessment. The patient presented with non-specific lower back pain 3 months after surgery. Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed single-level intradiscal fluid with adjacent endplate erosions, mild disc cage subsidence, marrow edema, and a rim-enhancing fluid collection. Biochemical markers were not convincing for spondylodiscitis and blood cultures were negative. Nonetheless, he was treated empirically with oral antibiotics. The patient showed significant improvement 3 weeks after the initial diagnosis was made, with subsequent imaging findings demonstrating the development of endplate osteolysis and implant subsidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case demonstrates the difficulty in diagnosing rhBMP-2 induced endplate osteolysis as it mimics spondylodiscitis on imaging. Clinicians should consider this complication as a differential diagnosis to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatment and to improve postoperative monitoring protocols, even with newer rhBMP-2 formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"1149-1156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775604/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31Epub Date: 2025-12-22DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-104
Pranit Kumaran, David McCavitt, Zachary Singh, Daniel Rusu, Aidan Lindgren, Henry Avetisian, William Karakash, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram Alluri
Background: Endoscopic decompression (ED) and microscopic decompression (MD) are newer minimally invasive approaches for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, the absence of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials raises concerns for the potential of bias, or spin, in studies evaluating these techniques. This study aims to analyze the prevalence of spin in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ED and MD as treatments for LSS.
Methods: Studies were identified using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis guidelines searching PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus. Articles included were: (I) a systematic review with or without a meta-analysis; (II) degenerative etiology; (III) human subjects; (IV) available in English. Abstracts were graded for incidence of the 15 most common types of spin, and full texts were reviewed using AMSTAR 2 classification. General demographics were identified, including study title, author, journal of publication, year of publication, level of evidence (LOE), study design, and funding. Fisher's exact test was used to compare study metrics.
Results: Ten studies were included, all of which contained at least one type of spin. Spin type 12 ("Conclusion claims equivalence or comparable effectiveness for non-statistically significant results with a wide confidence interval") and type 3 (Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention) were the most common forms of spin, found in 5/10 (50%) of the included studies. All 10 studies received a confidence rating of "critically low" according to the AMSTAR 2 domain. There were no significant associations between incidence of spin type and year of publication, journal of publication, number of citations, LOE, funding, Clarivate impact factor, or ScopusCiteScore.
Conclusions: Spin is highly prevalent in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating ED versus MD. All ten manuscripts evaluated received a low quality rating according to the AMSTAR 2 domain.
背景:内镜下减压(ED)和显微下减压(MD)是治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)较新的微创手术方法。然而,由于缺乏大规模、高质量的随机对照试验,人们担心在评估这些技术的研究中可能存在偏倚或旋转。本研究旨在分析比较ED和MD治疗LSS的系统综述和荟萃分析摘要中自旋的流行程度。方法:使用系统评价和元分析指南的首选报告项目检索PubMed、Web of Science (WOS)和Scopus来确定研究。纳入的文章包括:(1)有或没有荟萃分析的系统综述;(II)退行性病因学;(三)人体受试者;(四)有英文版本。根据15种最常见自旋的发生率对摘要进行分级,并使用AMSTAR 2分类对全文进行审查。确定一般人口统计学信息,包括研究标题、作者、发表期刊、发表年份、证据水平(LOE)、研究设计和资金。Fisher的精确检验被用来比较研究指标。结果:纳入10项研究,所有研究均包含至少一种旋转类型。自旋类型12(“结论声称对具有广泛置信区间的非统计显著结果具有等效或可比较的有效性”)和类型3(选择性报告或过度强调疗效结果或有利于实验干预有益效果的分析)是最常见的自旋形式,在纳入的研究中有5/10(50%)发现。根据AMSTAR 2域,所有10项研究的置信度评级均为“极低”。自旋类型的发生率与发表年份、发表期刊、被引次数、LOE、经费、Clarivate影响因子或ScopusCiteScore之间无显著关联。结论:自旋在研究ED与MD的系统综述和荟萃分析摘要中非常普遍。根据AMSTAR 2域,所有10篇被评估的手稿都获得了低质量评级。
{"title":"Reporting bias is prevalent in systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to endoscopic <i>vs.</i> microscopic decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pranit Kumaran, David McCavitt, Zachary Singh, Daniel Rusu, Aidan Lindgren, Henry Avetisian, William Karakash, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram Alluri","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-104","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic decompression (ED) and microscopic decompression (MD) are newer minimally invasive approaches for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, the absence of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials raises concerns for the potential of bias, or spin, in studies evaluating these techniques. This study aims to analyze the prevalence of spin in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ED and MD as treatments for LSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis guidelines searching PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus. Articles included were: (I) a systematic review with or without a meta-analysis; (II) degenerative etiology; (III) human subjects; (IV) available in English. Abstracts were graded for incidence of the 15 most common types of spin, and full texts were reviewed using AMSTAR 2 classification. General demographics were identified, including study title, author, journal of publication, year of publication, level of evidence (LOE), study design, and funding. Fisher's exact test was used to compare study metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, all of which contained at least one type of spin. Spin type 12 (\"Conclusion claims equivalence or comparable effectiveness for non-statistically significant results with a wide confidence interval\") and type 3 (Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention) were the most common forms of spin, found in 5/10 (50%) of the included studies. All 10 studies received a confidence rating of \"critically low\" according to the AMSTAR 2 domain. There were no significant associations between incidence of spin type and year of publication, journal of publication, number of citations, LOE, funding, Clarivate impact factor, or ScopusCiteScore.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spin is highly prevalent in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating ED versus MD. All ten manuscripts evaluated received a low quality rating according to the AMSTAR 2 domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"851-860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.21037/jss-25-87
Kevin Mathew, Camille Flynn, Will Karakash, Henry Avetisian, Jeffrey C Wang, Justin M Lantz
Background: Postoperative activity restrictions are commonly prescribed after spine surgery. However, it is unclear whether postoperative restrictions improve clinical or surgical outcomes after spine surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery on patient-reported outcomes. The secondary aim of the study was to assess whether these postoperative activity restrictions were associated with recurrence (reherniation), adverse events, and complications after spine surgery.
Methods: This review included studies discussing degenerative spine surgery patients with postoperative activity restrictions, defined as limitations on specific movements such as bending or twisting, or activities such as driving or weightlifting. Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science databases in November 2024. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, Version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) tools were used to evaluate included studies for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was initially planned but was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the certainty of the body of evidence.
Results: A total of 3,723 studies were screened. Four studies met the inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial and two prospective single-arm cohort studies discussing open lumbar discectomy, and one prospective non-randomized two-group cohort study discussing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Notably, there are no studies discussing restrictions after cervical or thoracic spinal surgery. Pain, function/disability, and data on recurrence (reherniation), adverse events and complications were collected from each study. The certainty of evidence was low for all outcomes analyzed, making it difficult to provide a definitive conclusion for or against the use of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery.
Conclusions: Current literature prevents a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of postoperative restrictions in spine surgery. Future studies should address the limitations and heterogeneity of the current literature to provide the basis for standardized, evidence-based postoperative activity restriction protocols.
背景:脊柱手术后通常规定术后活动限制。然而,尚不清楚术后限制是否能改善脊柱手术后的临床或手术结果。本研究的主要目的是调查脊柱手术术后活动限制对患者报告结果的影响。该研究的次要目的是评估这些术后活动限制是否与脊柱手术后的复发(再突出)、不良事件和并发症有关。方法:本综述纳入了讨论退行性脊柱手术患者术后活动受限的研究,定义为特定运动如弯曲或扭转,或活动如驾驶或举重的限制。电子检索于2024年11月使用PubMed、CENTRAL、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行。使用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)和非随机干预研究的偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-I V2)来评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。最初计划进行meta分析,但由于纳入研究的异质性,未进行meta分析。建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法用于确定证据体的确定性。结果:共筛选了3723项研究。四项研究符合纳入标准:一项随机对照试验和两项前瞻性单组队列研究讨论开放式腰椎间盘切除术,一项前瞻性非随机两组队列研究讨论经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)。值得注意的是,没有研究讨论颈椎或胸椎手术后的限制。从每项研究中收集疼痛、功能/残疾、复发(再疝)、不良事件和并发症的数据。所有分析结果的证据的确定性都很低,因此很难给出支持或反对在脊柱手术中使用术后活动限制的明确结论。结论:目前的文献对脊柱手术术后限制的有效性没有明确的结论。未来的研究应解决现有文献的局限性和异质性,为标准化、循证的术后活动限制方案提供基础。
{"title":"The effects of postoperative activity restrictions on outcomes after spine surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Kevin Mathew, Camille Flynn, Will Karakash, Henry Avetisian, Jeffrey C Wang, Justin M Lantz","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-87","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jss-25-87","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative activity restrictions are commonly prescribed after spine surgery. However, it is unclear whether postoperative restrictions improve clinical or surgical outcomes after spine surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery on patient-reported outcomes. The secondary aim of the study was to assess whether these postoperative activity restrictions were associated with recurrence (reherniation), adverse events, and complications after spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review included studies discussing degenerative spine surgery patients with postoperative activity restrictions, defined as limitations on specific movements such as bending or twisting, or activities such as driving or weightlifting. Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science databases in November 2024. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, Version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) tools were used to evaluate included studies for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was initially planned but was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the certainty of the body of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,723 studies were screened. Four studies met the inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial and two prospective single-arm cohort studies discussing open lumbar discectomy, and one prospective non-randomized two-group cohort study discussing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Notably, there are no studies discussing restrictions after cervical or thoracic spinal surgery. Pain, function/disability, and data on recurrence (reherniation), adverse events and complications were collected from each study. The certainty of evidence was low for all outcomes analyzed, making it difficult to provide a definitive conclusion for or against the use of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current literature prevents a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of postoperative restrictions in spine surgery. Future studies should address the limitations and heterogeneity of the current literature to provide the basis for standardized, evidence-based postoperative activity restriction protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 4","pages":"1081-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}