Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment最新文献

Introduction

Research defines recovery capital as the amount of tangible and intangible resources (e.g., human/personal, physical, social, and cultural) available to initiate and sustain recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs). An individual's amount of recovery capital is dynamic over time and influenced by a number of factors such as baseline amount at initiation of recovery/treatment, length of abstinence, access/availability of resources, and individual factors such as the decision to utilize available resources. Research has been proposed delay discounting (DD), which reflects an individual's relative preference for immediate versus delayed rewards, as a candidate behavioral marker for SUDs but has not yet examined it in the context of recovery capital, and DD may be an important aspect of human capital. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine associations among recovery capital, DD, and length of abstinence.

Methods

The study included in its analysis data from 111 individuals in recovery from SUDs from the International Quit and Recovery Registry, an ongoing data collection program used to further scientific understanding of recovery. The study assessed recovery capital using the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and assessed discounting rates using an adjusting-delay task. The study team performed univariate linear regression to examine the relationship between total ARC score and demographic variables, length of abstinence, and DD. The research team performed a mediation analysis to understand the role of length of abstinence in mediating the relationship between DD and ARC score.

Results

Total ARC score was significantly negatively associated with DD and positively associated with length of abstinence, even after adjusting for covariates. Mediation analysis indicated that length of abstinence significantly partially mediated the relationship between DD and ARC score.

Conclusion

These findings support the characterization of DD as an important aspect of human capital and a candidate behavioral marker for SUDs. Future research may wish to investigate whether interventions designed to increase the value of future rewards also increase recovery capital.

Introduction

The current study explored the prevalence of hazardous alcohol and drug consumption within bartenders and the impact of working more than 40 h a week on levels of alcohol and drug use.

Methods

Three hundred and ninety bartenders (247 females), recruited via social media, took part in a cross-sectional online survey. The study recorded units of alcohol and hours worked per week among participants. The team measured hazardous drinking using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and drug use by the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST).

Results

According to AUDIT scores, 39% of participants were classed as having harmful alcohol consumption and 43.6% reported moderate/severe alcohol use that might indicate alcohol dependence. According to DAST scores, 21.8% of participants were classed as intermediate risk, 6.5% as substantial risk, and 0.5% as severe risk for drug use problems.

Male bartenders reported drinking significantly more units of alcohol per week and scored significantly higher on the AUDIT compared to females. Bartenders aged 26–30 and 31–40 reported drinking significantly more alcohol per week than bartenders aged 18–25. Additionally, bartenders aged 26–30 scored significantly higher on the AUDIT than ages 41–55.

A high workload (more than 40 h per week) had a significant effect on units of alcohol drunk per week.

Conclusion

This research indicates that hazardous alcohol and drug use is highly prevalent among this sample of bartenders. Working more than 40 h a week increases the amount of alcohol consumed, with males reporting higher use of alcohol and more problematic use than females. Additionally, those aged between 26 and 30 and 31 and 40 reported higher and more problematic use of alcohol compared to those in other age groups. These findings are important for public health because they describe a population that may be at risk of developing alcohol and substance use problems, and highlight the importance of adopting the brief, preventative interventions that we have suggested. Further research must help us to better understand the risk factors and causality involved in hazardous alcohol and drug use among bartenders.

Introduction

Current evidence indicates that buprenorphine is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), though premature medication discontinuation is common. Research on concurrent psychosocial and behavioral therapy services and related outcomes is limited.

The goal of this study was to define patterns of OUD-related psychosocial and behavioral therapy services received in the first 6 months after buprenorphine initiation, identify patients' characteristics associated with service patterns, and examine the course of buprenorphine treatment, including the association of therapy with medication treatment duration.

Methods

We analyzed 2013–2018 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid claims data. The sample included adults aged 18–64 years at buprenorphine initiation with treatment episodes of at least 7 days (n = 61,976). We used group-based trajectory models to define therapy service patterns and multinomial logistic regression to identify pre-treatment patient characteristics associated with therapy trajectories. Multinomial propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards regression estimated time to buprenorphine discontinuation and unweighted Cox proportional hazards models estimated risk of adverse health care events during buprenorphine treatment (all-cause and opioid-related inpatient and emergency department services, overdose treatment).

Results

We identified three trajectories of psychosocial and behavioral therapy services: none (73.8%), low-intensity (17.2%), and high-intensity (9.0%). Compared to those without therapy, low-intensity and high-intensity service patterns were associated with behavioral health diagnoses and medical treatment for opioid overdose in the baseline period prior to buprenorphine initiation. The hazard of buprenorphine discontinuation was significantly lower for low-intensity (HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.54–0.57) and high-intensity (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67–0.74) therapy groups compared to those without therapy services. Yet patients in the high-intensity therapy group had increased risk of opioid-related health care events during buprenorphine treatment, including medical treatment for opioid overdose (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01–1.64).

Conclusion

Most patients received little or no OUD-related psychosocial and behavioral therapy after initiating buprenorphine treatment. Patients who received therapy had characteristics indicating greater treatment needs as well as more complex treatment courses. Concurrent therapy services may help to address premature buprenorphine discontinuation, particularly for patients with high-risk clinical profiles; however, future prospective research should determine whether therapy is effective for extending buprenorphine retention.

Background

People who use unregulated drugs (PWUD) often face significant barriers to—and thereby avoid seeking—health care. In Vancouver, Canada, a neighborhood-wide health care system reform began in 2016 to improve health care delivery and quality. In the wake of this reform, we sought to determine the prevalence of health care avoidance and its association with emergency department use among PWUD in this setting and examine patient-reported nonmedical qualities of health care (“responsiveness”).

Methods

The study derived data from two prospective cohort studies of community-recruited PWUD in Vancouver in 2017–18. Responsiveness was ascertained by the World Health Organizations' standardized measurements and we evaluated seven domains of responsiveness (dignity, autonomy, communication, confidentiality, prompt attention, choice of provider, and quality of basic amenities). The study used Pearson chi-squared test to examine differences in responsiveness between those who did and did not avoid care. The study team used multivariable logistic regression to determine the relationship between care avoidance due to past mistreatment and emergency department use, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

Among 889 participants, 520 (58.5%) were male, 204 (22.9%) reported avoiding health care, most commonly for chronic pain (47.4%). Overall, 6.6% to 36.2% reported suboptimal levels (i.e., not always meeting the expected quality) across all seven measured domain of responsiveness. Proportions reporting suboptimal qualities were significantly higher among those who avoided care than those who did not across all domains, including care as soon as wanted (51.0% vs. 31.8%), listened to carefully (44.1% vs. 20.4%), and involved in health care decision-making (27.9% vs. 12.7%) (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, avoidance of health care was independently associated with self-reported emergency department use (adjusted odds ratio = 1.49; 95% confidence interval:1.01–2.19).

Conclusion

We found that almost a quarter of our sample of PWUD avoided seeking health care due to past mistreatment, and all seven measured domains of responsiveness were suboptimal and linked with avoidance. Individuals who reported avoidance of health care were significantly more likely to report emergency department use. Multi-level interventions are needed to remedy the suboptimal qualities of health care and thereby reduce care avoidance.

Introduction

Black women are at heightened risk for trauma exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorders (SUDs), compared to White women and the general population. However, disparities in treatment engagement and retention persist, particularly for Black women with co-occurring PTSD+SUD. Although therapeutic alliance is an important predictor and mediator of treatment retention and outcomes, we know little about predictors of alliance and the mediating role of alliance for PTSD+SUD outcomes among Black women.

Methods

This study utilized data previously collected for the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Women and Trauma Study. Participants were 88 Black/African American women (M_age = 41.90, SD = 7.72) participating in a clinical trial comparing Seeking Safety (a cognitive-behavioral intervention for PTSD+SUD) to Women's Health Education (control). This study includes participants from both arms. Measures included the Helping Alliance Questionnaire, Addiction Severity Index-Lite, and Clinician Administered PTSD Scale. Women in the intervention arm also completed the Seeking Safety Feedback Questionnaire.

Results

Stepwise, hierarchical linear regressions indicated that years of education and previous alcohol/drug treatment attempts significantly predicted early alliance in the second week of therapy (β = 0.411, p = .021 and β = 0.383, p = .011, respectively), but not late alliance in the last week of therapy (ps > .794). Greater education and more treatment attempts were associated with higher early alliance. Alliance did not mediate relationships between these significant predictors and treatment outcomes (e.g., attendance, post-treatment PTSD and SUD symptoms) or treatment feedback in the Seeking Safety group.

Conclusions

Education and prior treatment attempts predicted early alliance among Black/African American women in PTSD+SUD group treatment, and higher education level was associated with poorer Seeking Safety feedback topic ratings. Educational level and treatment history should be considered during alliance building in therapeutic interventions with Black women. Clinicians may consider the integration of pre-treatment alliance-building strategies with Black female patients who have lower levels of education. This study provides insight into the relative impact of several important factors that influence early alliance among Black women with co-occurring PTSD+SUD.

Introduction

Although approximately 70% of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people reside in urban areas, very few opioid prevention interventions exist for urban AI/AN emerging adults. The study team conducted this study to develop Traditions and Connections for Urban Native Americans (TACUNA), a new opioid prevention intervention for urban AI/AN emerging adults ages 18–25. TACUNA comprises three 2-hour virtual workshops.

Methods

We conducted thirteen focus groups in three urban communities in northern, central, and southern California (six with urban AI/AN emerging adults ages 18–25 [n = 32], four with parents [n = 26], and three with providers [n = 33]) to identify relevant intervention domains. We then incorporated the results of a rapid analysis of the focus groups to develop intervention workshops followed by a pilot test (n = 15) to further refine the intervention and assess feasibility.

Results

Four major domains emerged from focus groups: 1) historical trauma/cultural identity, 2) AI/AN traditional practices, 3) social networks, and 4) substance use. We incorporated all feedback relating to each theme to enhance content of the TACUNA intervention. Pilot test participants felt that TACUNA content was interesting, addressed their issues and concerns as urban AI/AN emerging adults, and believed that the program could help them to establish cultural and social connections to live healthier lives.

Conclusions

Research activities demonstrate how a community-informed and culturally grounded opioid prevention intervention can be developed for urban AI/AN emerging adults. Addressing issues and challenges with culturally and developmentally relevant intervention content can help to build resilience and hopefully decrease opioid use among this underserved population.

Introduction

Patients who initially survive opioid-related overdose are at high risk for subsequent mortality. Our health system aimed to evaluate the presence of disparities in prescribing naloxone following opioid overdose.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in our health system, which comprises two academic centers and eight community hospitals. Eligible patients had at least one visit to any of our hospital's emergency departments (EDs) with a diagnosis code indicating opioid-related overdose between May 1, 2018, and April 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was prescription of nasal naloxone after at least one visit for opioid-related overdose during the study period.

Results

The health system had 1348 unique patients who presented 1593 times to at least one of the EDs with opioid overdose. Of included patients, 580 (43.2%) received one or more prescriptions for naloxone. The majority (68.9%, n = 925) were male. For race/ethnicity, 74.5% (1000) were Non-Hispanic White, 8.0% (n = 108) were Non-Hispanic Black, and 13.0% (n = 175) were Hispanic/Latinx. Compared with the reference age group of 16–24 years, only those 65+ were less likely to receive naloxone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.84). The study found no difference for gender (male aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97–1.57 compared to female). Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive a prescription when compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22–2.44), while no difference occurred between Non-Hispanic Black compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87–1.98).

Conclusions

Naloxone prescribing after overdose in our system was suboptimal, with fewer than half of patients with an overdose diagnosis code receiving this lifesaving and evidence-based intervention. Patients who were Hispanic/Latinx were more likely to receive naloxone than other race and ethnicity groups, and patients who were older were less likely to receive it. Health systems need ongoing equity-informed implementation of programs to expand access to naloxone to all patients at risk.

Introduction

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) are of increasing concern among adolescents, especially those who use substances. Some evidence suggests that existing evidence-based substance use treatments (EBTs) could impact not only their intended substance use targets but also SITB. However, which types of substance use treatments may have the greatest impact on youth SITB is not yet clear. Based on prior literature showing that family support and connection may buffer youth from SITB, we initially hypothesized that family-based EBTs would show greater improvement in SITB compared to those receiving individually focused EBTs and that the size of the effects would be small given the comparison between two active, evidence-based interventions, and base rates of SITB.

Methods

In a sample of 2893 youth in substance use treatment, we compared the effectiveness of individually and family-based EBTs in reducing SITBs. The study used entropy balancing and regression modeling to balance the groups on pre-treatment characteristics and examine change in outcomes over a one-year follow-up period.

Results

Both groups improved in self-injury and suicide attempts over the one-year study period, but only youth in individual treatment improved in suicidal ideation. However, the study found no significant difference between the changes over time in the two groups for any outcome. As expected, effect sizes were small and power was constrained in this study given the rarity of the outcomes, but effect sizes are similar to those observed with substance use outcomes.

Conclusions

The results provide important exploratory evidence on the potential relative effectiveness of these two treatments for SITBs. This study supports prior findings that EBTs for youth substance use may help to improve SITB and suggests that different treatment formats (individual or family-based) could result in different benefits for SITB outcomes.

Background

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) has invested substantial resources in Certified Community Behavioral Health Centers (CCBHCs) to integrate mental health and addiction treatment and to address the nation's epidemic of opioid-related morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Using an audit or “secret shopper” method, we surveyed 311 CCBHCs listed in SAMHSA's Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator to identify the proportion of centers that offer buprenorphine and/or methadone treatment and the proportion of these that offer a prescriber visit during patients' first visit to the center.

Results

We received responses from 82.6% (n = 257) of the CCBHCs that we attempted to contact. Of those contacted, 33.9% said they offered agonist therapy, 33.5% said they could refer patients to a buprenorphine or methadone provider, and 32.7% said they could neither offer nor refer patients for agonist therapy. Of the agencies contacted, only 2.7% could confirm the availability of a prescriber visit at the patient's first visit to the CCBHC.

Conclusions

Despite significant federal investment to integrate addiction and mental health treatment in CCBHCs, CCBHCs have not generally become providers of low-threshold buprenorphine and/or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. Policy-makers should consider how to better incentivize low-threshold access to buprenorphine and methadone treatment in the nation's network of CCBHCs.