With increasing prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), there is a need to provide appropriate management. Several studies have suggested that minorities in the United States have limited access to non-invasive imaging leading to increased presentation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAHs). Given our medical institution's commitment to ensuring racial equality within our health care system, we chose to analyze our practice to assess the utilization of care provided by our neuroendovascular team. We hypothesized that given our diverse neuroendovascular care team along with our dedication to equity in healthcare, that we would find no difference in care provided to minority patients versus white patients who presented with UIAs.
We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record-based review of all patients with UIAs (n = 140) between September 2010 and June 2022 treated at a county hospital. Data regarding age at the time of treatment, gender, race, insurance type and aneurysm location were obtained.
Of the 140 patients that underwent treatment, 54 % of patients were from the Black/Hispanic group and 46 % were from the white/non-Hispanic group. Commercial/private insurance was more common among White/NonHispanic patients (57.7 % vs 51.4 %) whereas Medicaid or uninsured status was more common among Black/Hispanic patients (25.7 % vs 15.4 %), although these differences were not statistically significant.
Building a diverse neuroendovascular physician team with intentionality to equity in healthcare, and providing appropriate funding and resources to facilities used by marginalized populations, such as safety-net institutions, can mitigate minority patients’ limited access to intracranial aneurysmal care.
ACP is pivotal in patient care. It emphasizes respecting an individual's values, preferences, and goals in decision-making. Although ACP is beneficial to patients and families, disparities persist, particularly among marginalized groups. We undertook this study to assess these disparities between ACP among patients of various groups and evaluate the relationship between these factors on shared-decision making.
A retrospective cohort analysis collected data from a single facility spanning March to September 2023, focusing on palliative care encounters. Data were categorized by demographics (race, age, gender) and factors affecting patient and family decisions, including religion, marital status, diagnosis, and ultimate choices (DNR/DNI, comfort-measures, hospice). We examined these variables through logistic regression models, chi-square tests, and F-tests (p < 0.05) to uncover potential correlations with advanced care planning.
End-stage dementia patients showed a significant association with the likelihood and probability of undergoing ACP. Patients opting for comfort-directed care, DNR/DNI, and hospice care correlated significantly with ACP. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant association (p-value >0.05) between race, gender, marital status, religion, or age and the likelihood of undergoing ACP.
Our results diverge from past trends, showing diminished rates of ACP completion among specific ethnic and religious demographics. One potential rationale is the integration of social workers within our facility, actively engaging in ACP with patients. This approach facilitates early interventions and ensures comprehensive patient services across both outpatient and inpatient settings. Overcoming obstacles to ACP conversations and embracing diverse perspectives is essential to achieving equitable and compassionate end-of-life care.