Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004501
Katrina M Morgan, Erin V Feeney, Philip C Spinella, Barbara A Gaines, Christine M Leeper
Background: Trauma-induced coagulopathy is common and associated with poor outcomes in injured children. Our aim was to identify patterns of coagulopathy after injury using endothelial, platelet, and coagulation biomarkers, and associate these phenotypes with relevant patient factors and clinical outcomes in a pediatric trauma cohort.
Methods: Principal component (PC) analysis was performed on data from injured children between 2018 and 2022. Laboratories included endothelial markers (syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, tissue factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor), international normalized ratio, platelet count, rapid thromboelastography maximum amplitude, and base deficit. Variables were reduced to PCs; PC scores were generated for each subject and used in logistic regression with outcomes including mortality, blood transfusion, shock (pediatric-adjusted shock index), and patient characteristics including age, sex, injury mechanism, and traumatic brain injury.
Results: In total, 59 children had complete data for analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 10 (4-14) years, 31% female, 21% penetrating mechanism, and median (interquartile range) injury severity score of 16 (9-21). Principal component analysis identified two significant PCs accounting for 67% of overall variance. PC1 included syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, vascular endothelial growth factor, international normalized ratio, and base deficit; PC1 scores were associated with mortality, blood transfusion, and shock (all p < 0.001). PC2 included tissue factor, platelet count, and rapid thromboelastography maximum amplitude; PC2 scores were associated with age (ρ = -0.42, p = 0.001) but no studied clinical outcome. Neither PC was significantly associated with sex, injury mechanism, or traumatic brain injury.
Conclusion: Principal component analysis detected two distinct biomarker patterns in injured children involving the domains of the endothelium, coagulation, and platelets. The first phenotype was associated with poor clinical outcomes, while the second was associated with age. This supports the concept that pediatric trauma-induced coagulopathy elicits a heterogeneous response, and suggests that there may be a prognostic value to these phenotypes that warrants further investigation.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
背景:创伤性凝血功能障碍在受伤儿童中很常见,且与不良预后相关。我们的目的是利用内皮、血小板和凝血生物标志物识别损伤后凝血功能障碍的模式,并将这些表型与相关患者因素和儿科创伤队列的临床结果联系起来。方法:对2018 - 2022年住院儿童受伤数据进行主成分分析。实验室包括内皮标志物(syndecan-1、血栓调节蛋白、组织因子和血管内皮生长因子)、国际标准化比率、血小板计数、快速血栓弹性成像最大振幅和碱基缺陷。变量被简化为pc;为每个受试者生成PC评分,并将其用于logistic回归,包括死亡率、输血、休克(儿科调整休克指数)和患者特征(包括年龄、性别、损伤机制和创伤性脑损伤)。结果:59例患儿有完整资料可供分析。年龄中位数(四分位范围)为10(4-14)岁,女性占31%,穿透机制占21%,损伤严重程度评分中位数(四分位范围)为16(9-21)。主成分分析确定了两个显著pc占总方差的67%。PC1包括syndecan-1、血栓调节蛋白、血管内皮生长因子、国际标准化比值、碱基赤字;PC1评分与死亡率、输血和休克相关(均p < 0.001)。PC2包括组织因子、血小板计数和快速血小板弹性成像最大振幅;PC2评分与年龄相关(ρ = -0.42, p = 0.001),但没有研究临床结果。PC与性别、损伤机制或创伤性脑损伤均无显著相关性。结论:主成分分析在受伤儿童中检测到两种不同的生物标志物模式,涉及内皮、凝血和血小板。第一种表型与不良临床结果有关,而第二种表型与年龄有关。这支持了儿童创伤性凝血功能障碍引起异质反应的概念,并表明这些表型可能具有预后价值,值得进一步研究。证据水平:预后和流行病学;IV级。
{"title":"Patterns of trauma-induced coagulopathy in injured children: A principal component analysis investigating endothelial, coagulation, and platelet biomarkers.","authors":"Katrina M Morgan, Erin V Feeney, Philip C Spinella, Barbara A Gaines, Christine M Leeper","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004501","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma-induced coagulopathy is common and associated with poor outcomes in injured children. Our aim was to identify patterns of coagulopathy after injury using endothelial, platelet, and coagulation biomarkers, and associate these phenotypes with relevant patient factors and clinical outcomes in a pediatric trauma cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Principal component (PC) analysis was performed on data from injured children between 2018 and 2022. Laboratories included endothelial markers (syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, tissue factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor), international normalized ratio, platelet count, rapid thromboelastography maximum amplitude, and base deficit. Variables were reduced to PCs; PC scores were generated for each subject and used in logistic regression with outcomes including mortality, blood transfusion, shock (pediatric-adjusted shock index), and patient characteristics including age, sex, injury mechanism, and traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 59 children had complete data for analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 10 (4-14) years, 31% female, 21% penetrating mechanism, and median (interquartile range) injury severity score of 16 (9-21). Principal component analysis identified two significant PCs accounting for 67% of overall variance. PC1 included syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, vascular endothelial growth factor, international normalized ratio, and base deficit; PC1 scores were associated with mortality, blood transfusion, and shock (all p < 0.001). PC2 included tissue factor, platelet count, and rapid thromboelastography maximum amplitude; PC2 scores were associated with age (ρ = -0.42, p = 0.001) but no studied clinical outcome. Neither PC was significantly associated with sex, injury mechanism, or traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Principal component analysis detected two distinct biomarker patterns in injured children involving the domains of the endothelium, coagulation, and platelets. The first phenotype was associated with poor clinical outcomes, while the second was associated with age. This supports the concept that pediatric trauma-induced coagulopathy elicits a heterogeneous response, and suggests that there may be a prognostic value to these phenotypes that warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":"98 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-14DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004391
Courtney H Meyer, Andrew Beckett, Bradley M Dennis, Juan Duchesne, Rishi Kundi, Urmil Pandya, Ryan Lawless, Ernest Moore, Chance Spalding, William M Vassy, Jonathan Nguyen
Background: Partial occlusion of the aorta is a resuscitation technique designed to maximize proximal perfusion while allowing a graduated amount of distal flow to reduce the ischemic sequelae associated with complete aortic occlusion. The pREBOA-PRO catheter affords the ability to titrate perfusion as hemodynamics allows; however, the impact of this new technology for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) on blood use and other resuscitative requirements is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patients undergoing REBOA with the pREBOA-PRO catheter will utilize partial occlusion, when appropriate, and decrease overall resuscitative requirements when compared to patients undergoing REBOA with the ER-REBOA catheter.
Methods: The entire American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry was used to compare resuscitation requirements between all ER-REBOA and pREBOA. Unpaired t tests were used to compare resuscitation strategies including packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, cryoprecipitate, crystalloids, and need for pressors.
Results: When comparing ER-REBOA (n = 800) use to pREBOA (n = 155), initial patient presentations were similar except for age (44 years vs. 40 years, p = 0.026) and rates of blunt injury (78.4% vs. 78.7% p < 0.010). Zone 1 occlusion was used less often in ER-REBOA (65.8 vs. 71.7, p = 0.046). Partial occlusion was performed in 85% of pREBOA compared with 11% in ER-REBOA ( p < 0.050). Vitals at the time of REBOA were worse in ER-REBOA and received significantly more units of PRBCs, FFP, platelets, and liters of crystalloids than pREBOA ( p < 0.05). Rates of ARDS and septic shock were lower in pREBOA ( p < 0.05).
Conclusion: When comparing pREBOA to ER-REBOA, there has been a rise in Zone 1 and partial occlusion. In our pilot analysis of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry, there was a reduction in administration of PRBCs, FFP, platelets, and crystalloids. Although further prospective studies are required, this is the first to demonstrate an association between pREBOA, partial occlusion, and reduced blood use and resuscitative requirements.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
{"title":"pREBOA versus ER-REBOA impact on blood utilization and resuscitation requirements: A pilot analysis.","authors":"Courtney H Meyer, Andrew Beckett, Bradley M Dennis, Juan Duchesne, Rishi Kundi, Urmil Pandya, Ryan Lawless, Ernest Moore, Chance Spalding, William M Vassy, Jonathan Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004391","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial occlusion of the aorta is a resuscitation technique designed to maximize proximal perfusion while allowing a graduated amount of distal flow to reduce the ischemic sequelae associated with complete aortic occlusion. The pREBOA-PRO catheter affords the ability to titrate perfusion as hemodynamics allows; however, the impact of this new technology for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) on blood use and other resuscitative requirements is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patients undergoing REBOA with the pREBOA-PRO catheter will utilize partial occlusion, when appropriate, and decrease overall resuscitative requirements when compared to patients undergoing REBOA with the ER-REBOA catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The entire American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry was used to compare resuscitation requirements between all ER-REBOA and pREBOA. Unpaired t tests were used to compare resuscitation strategies including packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, cryoprecipitate, crystalloids, and need for pressors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing ER-REBOA (n = 800) use to pREBOA (n = 155), initial patient presentations were similar except for age (44 years vs. 40 years, p = 0.026) and rates of blunt injury (78.4% vs. 78.7% p < 0.010). Zone 1 occlusion was used less often in ER-REBOA (65.8 vs. 71.7, p = 0.046). Partial occlusion was performed in 85% of pREBOA compared with 11% in ER-REBOA ( p < 0.050). Vitals at the time of REBOA were worse in ER-REBOA and received significantly more units of PRBCs, FFP, platelets, and liters of crystalloids than pREBOA ( p < 0.05). Rates of ARDS and septic shock were lower in pREBOA ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When comparing pREBOA to ER-REBOA, there has been a rise in Zone 1 and partial occlusion. In our pilot analysis of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry, there was a reduction in administration of PRBCs, FFP, platelets, and crystalloids. Although further prospective studies are required, this is the first to demonstrate an association between pREBOA, partial occlusion, and reduced blood use and resuscitative requirements.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141087899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004411
Mallory Loe, Jacob M Broome, Lauren Mueller, John T Simpson, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne
Background: Palpation of anatomic landmarks is difficult in patients with obesity, which could increase difficulty of achieving femoral access and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) placement. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and successful REBOA placement. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI) would decrease first-attempt success and increase time to successful aortic occlusion (AO).
Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was performed on patients who underwent REBOA placement with initiation systolic blood pressure >0 mm Hg from years 2013-2022. Patients were excluded if they received cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, underwent open AO, or missing data entries for variables of interest. Body mass index categorization was as follows: non-obese (<30), class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (40+) obesity. Patients were also stratified by access technique, including use of palpation or ultrasound guidance.
Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 410 patients. On binary analysis, no primary outcomes of interest, including rate of success, time to placement, or mortality, were significantly impacted by BMI. Among BMI subgroups, there was no statistical difference in injury severity, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), or augmented SBP. At initiation of aortic occlusion, patients with class II and class III obesity had higher median SBP compared with non- and class I obese patients ( p = 0.03). Body mass index subgroup did not impact likelihood of first-attempt success or conversion to open procedure. When stratified by access technique, there was no difference in success rates, time to success or mortality between groups.
Conclusion: Body habitus did not impact success of REBOA placement, time to successful AO, or mortality. Further, ultrasound guidance was not superior to landmark palpation for arterial access. Following traumatic injury without hemodynamic collapse, obesity should not deter providers from considering REBOA placement.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
{"title":"Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the patient with obesity.","authors":"Mallory Loe, Jacob M Broome, Lauren Mueller, John T Simpson, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004411","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palpation of anatomic landmarks is difficult in patients with obesity, which could increase difficulty of achieving femoral access and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) placement. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and successful REBOA placement. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI) would decrease first-attempt success and increase time to successful aortic occlusion (AO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was performed on patients who underwent REBOA placement with initiation systolic blood pressure >0 mm Hg from years 2013-2022. Patients were excluded if they received cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, underwent open AO, or missing data entries for variables of interest. Body mass index categorization was as follows: non-obese (<30), class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (40+) obesity. Patients were also stratified by access technique, including use of palpation or ultrasound guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 410 patients. On binary analysis, no primary outcomes of interest, including rate of success, time to placement, or mortality, were significantly impacted by BMI. Among BMI subgroups, there was no statistical difference in injury severity, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), or augmented SBP. At initiation of aortic occlusion, patients with class II and class III obesity had higher median SBP compared with non- and class I obese patients ( p = 0.03). Body mass index subgroup did not impact likelihood of first-attempt success or conversion to open procedure. When stratified by access technique, there was no difference in success rates, time to success or mortality between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body habitus did not impact success of REBOA placement, time to successful AO, or mortality. Further, ultrasound guidance was not superior to landmark palpation for arterial access. Following traumatic injury without hemodynamic collapse, obesity should not deter providers from considering REBOA placement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-14DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004390
Vanessa P Ho, Sami K Kishawi, Hannah Hill, Joseph O'Brien, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Sirivan Suon Seng, Trieu Hai Ton, Christopher A Butts, Alison Muller, Bernardo Fabian Diaz, Gerard A Baltazar, Patrizio Petrone, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Shawna Morrissey, Timothy Chung, Jessica Biller, Lewis E Jacobson, Jamie M Williams, Cole S Nebughr, Pascal O Udekwu, Kimberly Tann, Charles Piehl, Jessica M Veatch, Thomas J Capasso, Eric J Kuncir, Lisa M Kodadek, Samuel M Miller, Defne Altan, Caleb Mentzer, Nicholas Damiano, Rachel Burke, Angela Earley, Stephanie Doris, Erica Villa, Michael C Wilkinson, Jacob K Dixon, Esther Wu, Melissa L Moncrief, Brandi Palmer, Karen Herzing, Tanya Egodage, Jennifer Williams, James Haan, Kelly Lightwine, Kristin P Colling, Melissa L Harry, Jeffry Nahmias, Erika Tay-Lasso, Joseph Cuschieri, Christopher J Hinojosa, Jeffrey A Claridge
Background: Despite the high incidence of blunt trauma in older adults, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance for computed tomography (CT) imaging in this population. We aimed to identify an algorithm to guide use of a pan-scan (head/cervical spine [C-spine]/torso) or a selective scan (head/C-spine ± torso). We hypothesized that a patient's initial history and examination could be used to guide imaging.
Methods: We prospectively studied blunt trauma patients 65 years or older at 18 Level I/II trauma centers. Patients presenting >24 hours after injury or who died upon arrival were excluded. We collected history and physical elements and final injury diagnoses. Injury diagnoses were categorized into CT body regions of head/C-spine or Torso (chest, abdomen/pelvis, and thoracolumbar spine). Using machine learning and regression modeling as well as a priori clinical algorithms based, we tested various decision rules against our data set. Our priority was to identify a simple rule, which could be applied at the bedside, maximizing sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to minimize missed injuries.
Results: We enrolled 5,498 patients with 3,082 injuries. Nearly half (n = 2,587 [47.1%]) had an injury within the defined CT body regions. No rule to guide a pan-scan could be identified with suitable sensitivity/NPV for clinical use. A clinical algorithm to identify patients for pan-scan, using a combination of physical examination findings and specific high-risk criteria, was identified and had a sensitivity of 0.94 and NPV of 0.86. This rule would have identified injuries in all but 90 patients (1.6%) and would theoretically spare 11.9% (655) of blunt trauma patients a torso CT.
Conclusion: Our findings advocate for head/C-spine CT in all geriatric patients with the addition of torso CT in the setting of positive clinical findings and high-risk criteria. Prospective validation of this rule could lead to streamlined diagnostic care of this growing trauma population.
Level of evidence: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level II.
{"title":"Scanning the aged to minimize missed injury: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.","authors":"Vanessa P Ho, Sami K Kishawi, Hannah Hill, Joseph O'Brien, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Sirivan Suon Seng, Trieu Hai Ton, Christopher A Butts, Alison Muller, Bernardo Fabian Diaz, Gerard A Baltazar, Patrizio Petrone, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Shawna Morrissey, Timothy Chung, Jessica Biller, Lewis E Jacobson, Jamie M Williams, Cole S Nebughr, Pascal O Udekwu, Kimberly Tann, Charles Piehl, Jessica M Veatch, Thomas J Capasso, Eric J Kuncir, Lisa M Kodadek, Samuel M Miller, Defne Altan, Caleb Mentzer, Nicholas Damiano, Rachel Burke, Angela Earley, Stephanie Doris, Erica Villa, Michael C Wilkinson, Jacob K Dixon, Esther Wu, Melissa L Moncrief, Brandi Palmer, Karen Herzing, Tanya Egodage, Jennifer Williams, James Haan, Kelly Lightwine, Kristin P Colling, Melissa L Harry, Jeffry Nahmias, Erika Tay-Lasso, Joseph Cuschieri, Christopher J Hinojosa, Jeffrey A Claridge","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004390","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high incidence of blunt trauma in older adults, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance for computed tomography (CT) imaging in this population. We aimed to identify an algorithm to guide use of a pan-scan (head/cervical spine [C-spine]/torso) or a selective scan (head/C-spine ± torso). We hypothesized that a patient's initial history and examination could be used to guide imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied blunt trauma patients 65 years or older at 18 Level I/II trauma centers. Patients presenting >24 hours after injury or who died upon arrival were excluded. We collected history and physical elements and final injury diagnoses. Injury diagnoses were categorized into CT body regions of head/C-spine or Torso (chest, abdomen/pelvis, and thoracolumbar spine). Using machine learning and regression modeling as well as a priori clinical algorithms based, we tested various decision rules against our data set. Our priority was to identify a simple rule, which could be applied at the bedside, maximizing sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to minimize missed injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 5,498 patients with 3,082 injuries. Nearly half (n = 2,587 [47.1%]) had an injury within the defined CT body regions. No rule to guide a pan-scan could be identified with suitable sensitivity/NPV for clinical use. A clinical algorithm to identify patients for pan-scan, using a combination of physical examination findings and specific high-risk criteria, was identified and had a sensitivity of 0.94 and NPV of 0.86. This rule would have identified injuries in all but 90 patients (1.6%) and would theoretically spare 11.9% (655) of blunt trauma patients a torso CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings advocate for head/C-spine CT in all geriatric patients with the addition of torso CT in the setting of positive clinical findings and high-risk criteria. Prospective validation of this rule could lead to streamlined diagnostic care of this growing trauma population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599468/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141154723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004458
Mira H Ghneim, James V O'Connor, Thomas M Scalea
Abstract: Damage control surgery in trauma prioritizes patient stabilization through an initial temporizing surgical approach to rapidly control hemorrhage and contamination, minimizing intraoperative time to allow for resuscitation and the correction of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in the intensive care unit. This is followed by definitive repair of injuries once physiological parameters have improved. While damage control techniques for traumatic intra-abdominal and extremity injuries are well established and frequently utilized, the same cannot be said for damage control thoracic surgery. The complexity of thoracic injuries, the intricate decision making process, the level of surgical expertise required, and potential complications make damage control thoracic surgery particularly challenging. However, advances in surgical techniques, improvements in perioperative care, and the emergence of adjuncts such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have significantly enhanced decision making and underscored the importance of timely and decisive intervention in damage control thoracic surgery to optimize patient outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of damage control thoracic surgery, detailing the principles, indications, operative techniques, perioperative management, and the integration of advanced therapies to improve outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries.
{"title":"Damage control thoracic surgery: What you need to know.","authors":"Mira H Ghneim, James V O'Connor, Thomas M Scalea","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004458","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Damage control surgery in trauma prioritizes patient stabilization through an initial temporizing surgical approach to rapidly control hemorrhage and contamination, minimizing intraoperative time to allow for resuscitation and the correction of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in the intensive care unit. This is followed by definitive repair of injuries once physiological parameters have improved. While damage control techniques for traumatic intra-abdominal and extremity injuries are well established and frequently utilized, the same cannot be said for damage control thoracic surgery. The complexity of thoracic injuries, the intricate decision making process, the level of surgical expertise required, and potential complications make damage control thoracic surgery particularly challenging. However, advances in surgical techniques, improvements in perioperative care, and the emergence of adjuncts such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have significantly enhanced decision making and underscored the importance of timely and decisive intervention in damage control thoracic surgery to optimize patient outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of damage control thoracic surgery, detailing the principles, indications, operative techniques, perioperative management, and the integration of advanced therapies to improve outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-14DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004476
Samuel P Carmichael, Prafulla K Chandra, John W Vaughan, David M Kline, John B Holcomb, Anthony Atala
Background: Abdominal adhesions are networks of fibrotic tissues that form between organs postoperatively. Current prophylactic strategies do not reproducibly prevent adhesive small bowel obstruction across the entire abdomen. Human placental-derived stem cells produce an anti-inflammatory secretome that has been applied to multiple fibrosing diseases. The purpose of this project is to test human placental stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies for prevention of abdominal adhesions in a clinically relevant rat model.
Methods: Fifty-four (n = 54, n = 6/group) male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g) underwent model creation and treatment randomization under anesthesia. Experimental groups included human placental-derived stem cells (hPSC, 5 × 106 cells/10 mL Plasmalyte A), human placental-derived stem cells in a hyaluronic acid (HA-Mal-hPSC) hydrogel, the human placental-derived stem cell secretome from conditioned media in 10 mL Plasmalyte A, human placental-derived stem cells' conditioned media in a hyaluronic acid (HA-Mal-CM) hydrogel, Plasmalyte A (media alone, 10 mL), hyaluronic acid hydrogel alone (HA-Mal), Seprafilm (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), and the control groups, model with no treatment (MNT) and sham animals. Treatments were administered intraperitoneally, and the study period was 14 days postoperation. Adhesions were scored at necropsy and analyzed as the difference between means of an index statistic (Animal Index Score) versus MNT. Underlying molecular mechanisms were explored by functional genomic analysis and histology of peritoneal tissues.
Results: Hyaluronic acid hydrogel alone, HA-Mal-CM hydrogel, and Seprafilm significantly reduced the overall appearance of abdominal adhesions by mean Animal Index Score at 14 days versus MNT. Human placental stem cell, HA-Mal-hPSC hydrogel, HA-Mal-CM hydrogel, HA-Mal hydrogel alone, and Seprafilm significantly reduced the collagen content of injured peritoneal tissues. Human placental stem cell and HA-Mal-hPSC hydrogel suppressed expression of the most profibrotic genes. Conditioned media, HA-Mal hydrogel alone, and media alone significantly altered the expression of proteins associated with peritoneal fibrotic pathways.
Conclusion: Human placental stem cell-based therapies reduce abdominal adhesions in a prospective randomized preclinical trial. This effect is supported by suppression of profibrotic genomic and proteomic pathways.
背景:腹部粘连是术后器官间形成的纤维化组织网络。目前的预防策略不能重复地预防整个腹部粘连性小肠阻塞。人类胎盘来源的干细胞产生抗炎分泌组,已应用于多种纤维化疾病。本项目的目的是在临床相关的大鼠模型中测试基于人胎盘干细胞(hPSC)的治疗方法预防腹部粘连。方法:54只(n = 54, n = 6/组)雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠(250 ~ 350 g)在麻醉下造模和随机分组。实验组包括人胎盘源性干细胞(hPSC, 5 × 106个细胞/10 mL Plasmalyte A)、透明质酸(HA-Mal-hPSC)水凝胶中的人胎盘源性干细胞、条件培养基中10 mL Plasmalyte A中的人胎盘源性干细胞分泌组、透明质酸(HA-Mal- cm)水凝胶中的人胎盘源性干细胞条件培养基、Plasmalyte A(单独培养基,10 mL)、透明质酸单独水凝胶(HA-Mal)、sepil薄膜(Baxter, Deerfield, IL)、对照组为未治疗模型(MNT)和假动物。治疗方法为腹腔注射,研究期为术后14天。在尸检时对粘连进行评分,并作为指标统计平均值(动物指数评分)与MNT的差异进行分析。通过功能基因组分析和腹膜组织组织学探讨了潜在的分子机制。结果:与MNT相比,透明质酸水凝胶、HA-Mal-CM水凝胶和sepil薄膜在14天的平均动物指数评分中显著减少了腹部粘连的整体外观。人胎盘干细胞、HA-Mal- hpsc水凝胶、HA-Mal- cm水凝胶、HA-Mal水凝胶和sepilfilm均可显著降低损伤腹膜组织的胶原含量。人胎盘干细胞和HA-Mal-hPSC水凝胶抑制了大多数促纤维化基因的表达。条件培养基、单独的HA-Mal水凝胶和单独的培养基显著改变了与腹膜纤维化途径相关的蛋白质的表达。结论:在一项前瞻性随机临床前试验中,基于人胎盘干细胞的疗法可减少腹部粘连。这种作用是由纤维化基因组和蛋白质组学途径的抑制所支持的。
{"title":"Human placental stem cell-based therapies for prevention of abdominal adhesions: A prospective randomized preclinical trial.","authors":"Samuel P Carmichael, Prafulla K Chandra, John W Vaughan, David M Kline, John B Holcomb, Anthony Atala","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004476","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal adhesions are networks of fibrotic tissues that form between organs postoperatively. Current prophylactic strategies do not reproducibly prevent adhesive small bowel obstruction across the entire abdomen. Human placental-derived stem cells produce an anti-inflammatory secretome that has been applied to multiple fibrosing diseases. The purpose of this project is to test human placental stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies for prevention of abdominal adhesions in a clinically relevant rat model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four (n = 54, n = 6/group) male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g) underwent model creation and treatment randomization under anesthesia. Experimental groups included human placental-derived stem cells (hPSC, 5 × 106 cells/10 mL Plasmalyte A), human placental-derived stem cells in a hyaluronic acid (HA-Mal-hPSC) hydrogel, the human placental-derived stem cell secretome from conditioned media in 10 mL Plasmalyte A, human placental-derived stem cells' conditioned media in a hyaluronic acid (HA-Mal-CM) hydrogel, Plasmalyte A (media alone, 10 mL), hyaluronic acid hydrogel alone (HA-Mal), Seprafilm (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), and the control groups, model with no treatment (MNT) and sham animals. Treatments were administered intraperitoneally, and the study period was 14 days postoperation. Adhesions were scored at necropsy and analyzed as the difference between means of an index statistic (Animal Index Score) versus MNT. Underlying molecular mechanisms were explored by functional genomic analysis and histology of peritoneal tissues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyaluronic acid hydrogel alone, HA-Mal-CM hydrogel, and Seprafilm significantly reduced the overall appearance of abdominal adhesions by mean Animal Index Score at 14 days versus MNT. Human placental stem cell, HA-Mal-hPSC hydrogel, HA-Mal-CM hydrogel, HA-Mal hydrogel alone, and Seprafilm significantly reduced the collagen content of injured peritoneal tissues. Human placental stem cell and HA-Mal-hPSC hydrogel suppressed expression of the most profibrotic genes. Conditioned media, HA-Mal hydrogel alone, and media alone significantly altered the expression of proteins associated with peritoneal fibrotic pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Human placental stem cell-based therapies reduce abdominal adhesions in a prospective randomized preclinical trial. This effect is supported by suppression of profibrotic genomic and proteomic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":"98 1","pages":"78-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004451
Keita Shibahashi, Ken Inoue, Taichi Kato, Kazuhiro Sugiyama
Background: A subset of patients with traumatic cardiac arrest is salvageable when the reversible causes of cardiac arrest are promptly treated. However, prognosis and risk factors of survivors upon hospital admission after traumatic cardiac arrest remain unclear. We aimed to describe the outcomes, identify risk factors, and develop a simple risk-scoring model for patients resuscitated from traumatic cardiac arrest.
Methods: This observational multicenter study analyzed data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. Patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department and survived to the day after hospital admission for traumatic cardiac arrest were included. Factors associated with survival to hospital discharge were determined using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis. A simple scoring model was developed to stratify the probability of survival to hospital discharge.
Results: In total, 452 patients from 119 hospitals (median age, 64 years; 334 [74.4%] men) were included in the analysis. Of these, 130 (28.8%) survived until discharge. Penetrating injury, signs of life upon hospital arrival, and Injury Severity Score were significantly associated with survival at hospital discharge. A scoring model that assigned 1 point each for penetrating injury and signs of life upon hospital arrival effectively stratified the probability of survival to hospital discharge, with scores of 0, 1, and 2 corresponding to survival probabilities of 12.2%, 35.2%, and 83.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: This study described the outcomes and risk factors of patients resuscitated from traumatic cardiac arrest. Our simple scoring model effectively stratified the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
{"title":"Prognosis, risk factors, and scoring model of patients resuscitated from traumatic cardiac arrest: A multicenter observational study in Japan.","authors":"Keita Shibahashi, Ken Inoue, Taichi Kato, Kazuhiro Sugiyama","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004451","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A subset of patients with traumatic cardiac arrest is salvageable when the reversible causes of cardiac arrest are promptly treated. However, prognosis and risk factors of survivors upon hospital admission after traumatic cardiac arrest remain unclear. We aimed to describe the outcomes, identify risk factors, and develop a simple risk-scoring model for patients resuscitated from traumatic cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational multicenter study analyzed data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. Patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department and survived to the day after hospital admission for traumatic cardiac arrest were included. Factors associated with survival to hospital discharge were determined using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis. A simple scoring model was developed to stratify the probability of survival to hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 452 patients from 119 hospitals (median age, 64 years; 334 [74.4%] men) were included in the analysis. Of these, 130 (28.8%) survived until discharge. Penetrating injury, signs of life upon hospital arrival, and Injury Severity Score were significantly associated with survival at hospital discharge. A scoring model that assigned 1 point each for penetrating injury and signs of life upon hospital arrival effectively stratified the probability of survival to hospital discharge, with scores of 0, 1, and 2 corresponding to survival probabilities of 12.2%, 35.2%, and 83.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study described the outcomes and risk factors of patients resuscitated from traumatic cardiac arrest. Our simple scoring model effectively stratified the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"152-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-14DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004386
Kristen D Nordham, Danielle Tatum, Abdallah S Attia, Mayur B Patel, Anil Paramesh, Juan C Duchesne, Jeffry Nahmias, Amelia W Maiga, Allan B Peetz, Pascal O Udekwu, Anquonette Stiles, Chloe Shell, Joshua D Stodghill, Taneen Maghsoudi, Erin Iacullo, Bryant McLafferty, Erin Coonan, Ryan M Boudreau, Steven A Zimmerman, Berje Shammassian, Tanya Egodage, Isabella Aramento, Patrick Morris, Jacob Metheny, Michael S Farrell, Matthew D Painter, Owen T McCabe, Philomene Spadafore, David Tai-Wai Wong, Jan Serrano, Jason D Sciarretta, Phillip Kim, Ryan Hayton, Danessa Gonzales, Jason Murry, Katelyn Meadows, Lewis E Jacobson, Jamie M Williams, Andrew C Bernard, Brennan Smith, Shawna L Morrissey, Nilesh Patel, Dina Tabello, Erik Teicher, Sharfuddin Mahmud Chowdhury, Fazal Ahmad, Basem S Marcos, Michaela A West, Tomas H Jacome, Greggory Davis, Joshua A Marks, Deviney Rattigan, James M Haan, Kelly Lightwine, Kazuhide Matsushima, Stephen Park, Ariel Santos, Kripa Shrestha, Robert Sawyer, Sheri VandenBerg, Robert J Jean, R Chace Hicks, Stephanie Lueckel, Nikolay Bugaev, Wael Abosena, Claudia Alvarez, Mark J Lieser, Hannah McDonald, Ryan P Dumas, Caitlin A Fitzgerald, William Thomas Hillman Terzian, Yuqian Tian, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, John D Berne, Dalier R Mederos, Alison A Smith, Sharven Taghavi
Background: One third of organ donors suffer catastrophic brain injury (CBI). There are no standard guidelines for the management of traumatic CBI prior to brain death, and not all trauma centers have institutional CBI guidelines. In addition, there is high variability in management between institutions with guidelines. Catastrophic brain injury guidelines vary and may include various combinations of hormone therapy, vasopressors, fluid resuscitation, and other practices. We hypothesized that centers with CBI guidelines have higher organ donation rates than those without.
Methods: This prospective, observational EAST-sponsored multicenter trial included adult (18+ years old) traumatic-mechanism CBI patients at 33 level I and II trauma centers from January 2022 to May 2023. Catastrophic brain injury was defined as a brain injury causing loss of function above the brain stem and subsequent death. Cluster analysis with linear mixed-effects model including UNOS regions and hospital size by bed count was used to determine whether CBI guidelines are associated with organ donation.
Results: A total of 790 CBI patients were included in this analysis. In unadjusted comparison, CBI guideline centers had higher rates of organ donation and use of steroids, whole blood, and hormone therapy. In a linear mixed-effects model, CBI guidelines were not associated with organ donation. Registered organ donor status, steroid hormones, and vasopressin were associated with increased relative risk of donation.
Conclusion: There is high variability in management of CBI, even at centers with CBI guidelines in place. While the use of institutional CBI guidelines was not associated with increased organ donation, guidelines in this study were not identical. Hormone replacement with steroids and vasopressin was associated with increased donation. Hormone resuscitation is a common feature of CBI guidelines. Further analysis of individual practices that increase organ donation after CBI may allow for more effective guidelines and an overall increase in donation to decrease the long waiting periods for organ transplant recipients.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level II.
{"title":"Impact of catastrophic brain injury guidelines on organ donation rates: Results of an EAST multicenter trial.","authors":"Kristen D Nordham, Danielle Tatum, Abdallah S Attia, Mayur B Patel, Anil Paramesh, Juan C Duchesne, Jeffry Nahmias, Amelia W Maiga, Allan B Peetz, Pascal O Udekwu, Anquonette Stiles, Chloe Shell, Joshua D Stodghill, Taneen Maghsoudi, Erin Iacullo, Bryant McLafferty, Erin Coonan, Ryan M Boudreau, Steven A Zimmerman, Berje Shammassian, Tanya Egodage, Isabella Aramento, Patrick Morris, Jacob Metheny, Michael S Farrell, Matthew D Painter, Owen T McCabe, Philomene Spadafore, David Tai-Wai Wong, Jan Serrano, Jason D Sciarretta, Phillip Kim, Ryan Hayton, Danessa Gonzales, Jason Murry, Katelyn Meadows, Lewis E Jacobson, Jamie M Williams, Andrew C Bernard, Brennan Smith, Shawna L Morrissey, Nilesh Patel, Dina Tabello, Erik Teicher, Sharfuddin Mahmud Chowdhury, Fazal Ahmad, Basem S Marcos, Michaela A West, Tomas H Jacome, Greggory Davis, Joshua A Marks, Deviney Rattigan, James M Haan, Kelly Lightwine, Kazuhide Matsushima, Stephen Park, Ariel Santos, Kripa Shrestha, Robert Sawyer, Sheri VandenBerg, Robert J Jean, R Chace Hicks, Stephanie Lueckel, Nikolay Bugaev, Wael Abosena, Claudia Alvarez, Mark J Lieser, Hannah McDonald, Ryan P Dumas, Caitlin A Fitzgerald, William Thomas Hillman Terzian, Yuqian Tian, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, John D Berne, Dalier R Mederos, Alison A Smith, Sharven Taghavi","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004386","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One third of organ donors suffer catastrophic brain injury (CBI). There are no standard guidelines for the management of traumatic CBI prior to brain death, and not all trauma centers have institutional CBI guidelines. In addition, there is high variability in management between institutions with guidelines. Catastrophic brain injury guidelines vary and may include various combinations of hormone therapy, vasopressors, fluid resuscitation, and other practices. We hypothesized that centers with CBI guidelines have higher organ donation rates than those without.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational EAST-sponsored multicenter trial included adult (18+ years old) traumatic-mechanism CBI patients at 33 level I and II trauma centers from January 2022 to May 2023. Catastrophic brain injury was defined as a brain injury causing loss of function above the brain stem and subsequent death. Cluster analysis with linear mixed-effects model including UNOS regions and hospital size by bed count was used to determine whether CBI guidelines are associated with organ donation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 790 CBI patients were included in this analysis. In unadjusted comparison, CBI guideline centers had higher rates of organ donation and use of steroids, whole blood, and hormone therapy. In a linear mixed-effects model, CBI guidelines were not associated with organ donation. Registered organ donor status, steroid hormones, and vasopressin were associated with increased relative risk of donation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is high variability in management of CBI, even at centers with CBI guidelines in place. While the use of institutional CBI guidelines was not associated with increased organ donation, guidelines in this study were not identical. Hormone replacement with steroids and vasopressin was associated with increased donation. Hormone resuscitation is a common feature of CBI guidelines. Further analysis of individual practices that increase organ donation after CBI may allow for more effective guidelines and an overall increase in donation to decrease the long waiting periods for organ transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004438
Pawan Acharya, Tabitha Garwe, Sara K Vesely, Amanda Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, Amanda Celii
Background: Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression.
Results: Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol-activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification ( p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30-1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91).
Conclusion: The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
{"title":"The effect of whole blood resuscitation on in-hospital mortality: A propensity score weighted analysis of patients treated at a Level I trauma center.","authors":"Pawan Acharya, Tabitha Garwe, Sara K Vesely, Amanda Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, Amanda Celii","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004438","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol-activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification ( p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30-1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004396
Kayla M Wilson, Marissa W Mery, Erika Bengtson, Sarah E McWilliam, James M Bradford, Pedro G R Teixeira, Joseph J Dubose, Tatiana C Cardenas, Sadia Ali, Carlos V R Brown
Background: Unplanned return to the operating room (uROR) is associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Little is known regarding intraoperative factors associated with uROR after emergent surgery in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to identify intraoperative factors associated with uROR after emergent hemorrhage control procedures in bleeding trauma patients.
Methods: We used anesthetic record of intraoperative management to perform a retrospective study (2017-2022) of bleeding trauma patients who were taken for an emergent hemorrhage control operation.
Results: A total of 225 patients met the inclusion criteria, 46 (20%) had uROR, and 181 (80%) did not. While there was no difference in demographics, mechanism, admission physiology, or time from emergency department to operating room, the uROR patients had a higher Injury Severity Score (30 vs. 25, p = 0.007). While there was no difference in volume of crystalloid infused (3,552 ± 2,279 mL vs. 2,977 ± 2,817 mL, p = 0.20), whole blood (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.20), or platelets (11.6 ± 8.6 vs. 9.2 ± 9.0, p = 0.14), the uROR group received more packed red blood cells (11.5 ± 10.6 vs. 7.8 ± 7.5, p = 0.006) and plasma (9.6 ± 8.3 vs. 6.5 ± 6.6, p = 0.01), and more uROR patients received ≥10 U of packed red blood cells (48% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). Damage-control surgery (DCS) was more common in uROR patients (78% vs. 45%, p < 0.0001). After logistic regression, ≥10 U of packed cells in the operating room (4.3 [1.5-12.8], p = 0.009), crystalloid (1.0 [1.0-1.001], p = 0.009), International Normalized Ratio (INR) (7.6 [1.3-45.7], p = 0.03), and DCS (5.7 [1.7-19.1], p = 0.005) were independently associated with uROR.
Conclusion: Massive transfusion, crystalloid resuscitation, persistent coagulopathy, and DCS are the most significant risk factors for uROR. During hemorrhage control surgery in bleeding trauma patients who receive ≥10 U of blood, providers must maintain a keen focus on minimizing crystalloid and ongoing balanced resuscitation, particularly during damage-control procedures.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
背景:非计划返回手术室(uROR)与更差的预后和更高的死亡率有关。人们对创伤患者紧急手术后与意外返回手术室相关的术中因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定出血创伤患者紧急止血手术后与意外返回手术室相关的术中因素:我们利用麻醉记录术中管理,对接受紧急止血手术的出血性创伤患者进行回顾性研究(2017-2022年):共有225例患者符合纳入标准,46例(20%)有uROR,181例(80%)无uROR。虽然在人口统计学、机制、入院生理学或从急诊科到手术室的时间上没有差异,但uROR 患者的损伤严重程度评分更高(30 对 25,P = 0.007)。虽然晶体液输注量(3,552 ± 2,279 mL vs. 2,977 ± 2,817 mL,p = 0.20)、全血输注量(2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5,p = 0.20)或血小板输注量(11.6 ± 8.6 vs. 9.2 ± 9.0,p = 0.14),uROR 组接受了更多的包装红细胞(11.5 ± 10.6 vs. 7.8 ± 7.5,p = 0.006)和血浆(9.6 ± 8.3 vs. 6.5 ± 6.6,p = 0.01),更多的 uROR 患者接受了≥10 U 的包装红细胞(48% vs. 27%,p = 0.006)。损伤控制手术(DCS)在uROR患者中更为常见(78% 对 45%,P < 0.0001)。经过逻辑回归,手术室中≥10 U的包装细胞(4.3 [1.5-12.8],p = 0.009)、晶体液(1.0 [1.0-1.001],p = 0.009)、国际标准化比率(INR)(7.6 [1.3-45.7],p = 0.03)和DCS(5.7 [1.7-19.1],p = 0.005)与uROR独立相关:结论:大量输血、晶体液复苏、持续凝血病和 DCS 是导致 uROR 的最重要风险因素。在对输血量≥10 U 的大出血创伤患者进行出血控制手术期间,医疗人员必须密切关注尽量减少晶体液和持续平衡复苏,尤其是在损伤控制手术期间:证据级别:回顾性/描述性;IV 级。
{"title":"Intraoperative factors associated with unplanned return to the operating room after emergent hemorrhage control surgery.","authors":"Kayla M Wilson, Marissa W Mery, Erika Bengtson, Sarah E McWilliam, James M Bradford, Pedro G R Teixeira, Joseph J Dubose, Tatiana C Cardenas, Sadia Ali, Carlos V R Brown","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004396","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned return to the operating room (uROR) is associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Little is known regarding intraoperative factors associated with uROR after emergent surgery in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to identify intraoperative factors associated with uROR after emergent hemorrhage control procedures in bleeding trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used anesthetic record of intraoperative management to perform a retrospective study (2017-2022) of bleeding trauma patients who were taken for an emergent hemorrhage control operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 225 patients met the inclusion criteria, 46 (20%) had uROR, and 181 (80%) did not. While there was no difference in demographics, mechanism, admission physiology, or time from emergency department to operating room, the uROR patients had a higher Injury Severity Score (30 vs. 25, p = 0.007). While there was no difference in volume of crystalloid infused (3,552 ± 2,279 mL vs. 2,977 ± 2,817 mL, p = 0.20), whole blood (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.20), or platelets (11.6 ± 8.6 vs. 9.2 ± 9.0, p = 0.14), the uROR group received more packed red blood cells (11.5 ± 10.6 vs. 7.8 ± 7.5, p = 0.006) and plasma (9.6 ± 8.3 vs. 6.5 ± 6.6, p = 0.01), and more uROR patients received ≥10 U of packed red blood cells (48% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). Damage-control surgery (DCS) was more common in uROR patients (78% vs. 45%, p < 0.0001). After logistic regression, ≥10 U of packed cells in the operating room (4.3 [1.5-12.8], p = 0.009), crystalloid (1.0 [1.0-1.001], p = 0.009), International Normalized Ratio (INR) (7.6 [1.3-45.7], p = 0.03), and DCS (5.7 [1.7-19.1], p = 0.005) were independently associated with uROR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Massive transfusion, crystalloid resuscitation, persistent coagulopathy, and DCS are the most significant risk factors for uROR. During hemorrhage control surgery in bleeding trauma patients who receive ≥10 U of blood, providers must maintain a keen focus on minimizing crystalloid and ongoing balanced resuscitation, particularly during damage-control procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}