Journal of wound care最新文献

Objective: Family physicians (FPs) in Canada routinely perform in-office cutaneous surgery. There is strong evidence to support a moist wound healing environment, resulting in faster healing times and improved cosmesis. However, the wound care practices of FPs have not been previously studied. We aimed to examine the postoperative wound care practices of FPs after in-office cutaneous surgery.

Method: An online survey was distributed to Canadian FPs to determine post-surgical wound care practices. The survey examined moist versus dry wound healing and the reasons for these recommendations were explored. Additional wound care practices were also studied. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken.

Results: A total of 573 (91.5%) FPs completed the survey. Just under half (49.2%) of FPs recommended moist wound healing to their patients, while the remaining respondents (50.8%) recommended dry wound healing. The most endorsed reason for both moist and dry wound care recommendations was prior training (63.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Most physicians (57.2%) recommended the use of a cream or ointment postoperatively. While there appeared to be consensus on recommending sun avoidance after cutaneous surgery (77.7%), additional wound care practices varied, including: the use of dressings; cleansing practices; smoking cessation; reduction in physical activity; photoprotection; water exposure; and scar treatment/cosmetic use.

Conclusion: Almost half of FPs in Canada responding to the survey did not recommend moist wound healing despite strong evidence to support this practice. We also noted a diverse range of postoperative wound care practices after in-office cutaneous surgery. Therefore, these results highlight a critical need for consistent wound care recommendations following cutaneous surgery for FPs in Canada.

A single centre, non-comparative evaluation was undertaken to observe the clinical results achieved when following best practice for the application of Debrichem. The treatment protocol involved use of this debridement product plus standard of care. The sample comprised 21 patients with complex, non-healing wounds of various aetiologies. One patient dropped out of the evaluation for unknown reasons. Wound types were either venous leg ulcers (n=16) or post-traumatic wounds (n=25). The mean wound duration was 22 months (range: 2 weeks-17 years). Over the 4-week follow-up period, there was a decline in the mean percentage of devitalised tissue present on the wounds, reducing from 69% at baseline to 49% at week 4. Most of the devitalised tissue was slough, for which the mean baseline percentage was 63% compared with an endpoint of 49%. Conversely, the mean percentage of granulation tissue increased from 31% at baseline to 51% at week 4. The mean visual analogue pain score reported during application was 4/10, where 0 represents no pain. However, general wound-related pain scores improved during the follow-up period, with no scores above 2 at week 2, compared with five at baseline. The results indicate that Debrichem is a safe and effective method of debridement that requires minimal training and is single use.

It is now assumed that all hard-to-heal wounds contain biofilm. Debridement plays a key role in wound-bed preparation, as it can remove biofilm along with the devitalised tissue, potentially leaving a clean wound bed that is more likely to progress towards healing. The gold standard methods of debridement (surgical and sharp) are the least used, as they require specialist training and are often not readily available at the point of need. Most other methods can be used by generalists but are slower. They all need regular applications. The topical desiccating agent DEBRICHEM is an innovative alternative, as it is fast, effective and can be used in all clinical settings, as well as typically requiring only a single use. This article describes best practice for achieving optimal outcomes with its use.

Objective: The aim of this case series is to present an alternative approach to managing post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery (Mohs) wounds with hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM).

Method: A case series of patients with post-Mohs wounds is presented, with four patients referred for hard-to-heal wounds following a Mohs procedure that was performed 1-3 months previously. All wounds underwent weekly assessment, debridement, and application of HSAM and secondary dressings. Treatment also included management of bioburden, proper skin care and compression therapy for lower extremity wounds.

Results: This case series of seven wounds consisted of four females and three males with a mean age of 87.6 years. Mean wound size at first application of HSAM was 1.34±1.20cm². All wounds closed, with an average time to wound closure of 43.7±27.1 days. Patients received an average of 4.6±2.5 HSAM applications. The four post-Mohs wounds with a history of being hard-to-heal had an average time to wound closure of 35.5±16.3 days, with an average duration of 86.5±32.4 days prior to the first HSAM application.

Conclusion: The results of this case series suggest that use of HSAM may provide an alternative approach to managing post-Mohs wounds. In addition, these findings suggest that HSAM may be of greatest benefit when applied early after Mohs surgery.

Objective: The aim of this case report is to investigate an uncommon presentation of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes (RDD) disease, and discuss possible differential diagnoses and treatment options for this pathology. RDD is a rare disorder of histiocytes that typically presents in patients as painless cervical lymphadenopathy. However, this case involves a patient with the central nervous system (CNS) type of RDD who later developed cutaneous lesions.

Method: Several differential diagnoses were examined, including hidradenitis suppurativa, pilonidal cyst and pressure ulcers. It is important to be able to exclude these diagnoses based on the presentation, patient demographic and wound location.

Results: Biopsies verified the presence of RDD in the patient's suprasellar hypothalamic mass and skin lesions, confirming the patient had both CNS-RDD and cutaneous-RDD in the absence of lymphadenopathy.

Conclusion: Recognising the unique manifestations of rare diseases such as RDD prevents delay of proper intervention and treatment.

Objective: The objective of the systematic review is to examine and summarise the available evidence in the literature of the use of key performance indicators (KPIs) to inform evaluation of wound care programmes and services for people with hard-to-heal (complex) wounds. The need for wound care is expected to grow with the continued ageing of the population and the resulting increased development of chronic conditions. This expected increase necessitates improvement of wound care programmes and services and their ability to deliver quality, evidence-based and cost-effective practice. The current literature lacks a systematic assessment of KPIs to inform evaluation of wound care services and programmes across various settings, and how the KPIs are used to improve the quality of wound care and achieve desired outcomes. This protocol sets out how the systemtic review will be undertaken.

Method: Primary studies will be screened from databases such as MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus, with unpublished studies and grey literature retrieved from Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The study titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers, using Covidence systematic review software to ensure they meet the inclusion criteria, who will then proceed with data extraction of the full-text using the standardised data extraction instrument. The reference lists of all studies selected for critical appraisal will be screened for additional publications. The two independent reviewers will critically appraise all studies undergoing full-text data extraction using the appropriate checklist from JBI SUMARI. At all stages, differences between reviewers will be resolved through discussion, with adjudication by a third, independent reviewer.

Results: Data points will be analysed with descriptive statistics and grouped, based on programme characteristics and publication status. Grey literature and peer-reviewed publications will form separate analyses. To answer review questions, the data will be summarised in a narrative format. A meta-analysis is not planned. At the time of writing, this protocol has been implemented up to the preliminary literature search.

Conclusion: This review will address a current literature gap and systematically identify KPIs in wound care, allowing for programmes to evaluate their quality of care and improve their services in a methodical manner.