Hepatology最新文献

Background and aims: In autoimmune hepatitis, achieving complete biochemical remission (CBR) with current weight-based thiopurine dosing is challenging. We investigated whether patients could be stratified regarding CBR according to a target range of thiopurine metabolites. Moreover, we explored the effects of azathioprine dosage increases and co-therapy of allopurinol with low-dose thiopurines on metabolite profiles and treatment response.

Approach and results: The relation between metabolites and treatment response was assessed in 337 individuals from 4 European centers. In a global, cross-sectional analysis, active metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) were similar in those with and without CBR. However, analyzing patients with sequential measurements over 4 years (N = 146) revealed higher average 6TGN levels in those with stable CBR (260 pmol/0.2 mL) compared to those failing to maintain CBR (181 pmol/0.2 mL; p = 0.0014) or never achieving CBR (153 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), with an optimal 6TGN cutoff of ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL (sensitivity: 76% and specificity: 78%). Only 42% exhibited 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL following weight-based dosing, as doses weakly correlated with 6TGN but with 6-methylmercaptopurine (6MMP), a metabolite associated with toxicity. Azathioprine dose increases led to preferential 6MMP formation (+127% vs. 6TGN +34%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, adding allopurinol to thiopurines in difficult-to-treat patients (N = 36) raised 6TGN (168→321 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001) and lowered 6MMP (2125→184 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), resulting in improved transaminases in all patients and long-term CBR in 75%.

Conclusions: Maintaining CBR in autoimmune hepatitis was associated with 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL. For patients who fail to achieve CBR and therapeutic 6TGN levels despite thiopurine dose increase due to preferential 6MMP formation, comedication of allopurinol alongside low-dose thiopurines represents an efficient alternative.

Hepatic steatosis, the buildup of neutral lipids in lipid droplets (LDs), is commonly referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) when alcohol or viral infections are not involved. MASLD encompasses simple steatosis and the more severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), characterized by inflammation, hepatocyte injury, and fibrosis. Previously viewed as inert markers of disease, LDs are now understood to play active roles in disease etiology and have significant non-pathological and pathological functions in cell signaling and function. These dynamic properties of LDs are tightly regulated by hundreds of proteins that coat the LD surface, controlling lipid metabolism, trafficking, and signaling. The following review highlights various facets of LD biology with the primary goal of discussing key mechanisms through which LDs can promote the development of advanced liver diseases including MASH.

Background aims: Liver transplant (LT) for Transplant Oncology (TO) indications is being slowly adopted worldwide and has been recommended to be incorporated cautiously due to concerns on mid-long term survival and its impact on waiting list.

Approach results: We conducted four systematic reviews of all series on TO indications (intrahepatic (iCC) and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCC)), liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and colorectal cancer (CRLM)) and compared them using patient-level meta-analyses to data obtained from UNOS database considering conventional daily-practice indications. Secondary analyses were done for specific selection criteria (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM and Milan criteria for NET). A total of 112.014 LT were analyzed from 2005 to 2020 from the UNOS databases and compared with 345, 721, 494 and 103 patients obtained from meta-analyses on iCC and phCC, and liver metastases from NET and CRLM, respectively. Five-years overall survival was 53,3%, 56,4%, 68,6% and 53,8%, respectively. In Mantel-Cox one-to-one comparisons, survival of TO indications was superior to combined LT, second and third LT and and not statistically significant different to LT in recipients>70 years and high BMI.

Conclusions: Liver transplantation for TO indications has adequate 5-years survival rates, mostly when performed under the selection criteria available in literature (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM and Milan for NET). Despite concerns on its impact on waiting list, some other LT indications are being performed with lower survival. These oncological patients should be given the opportunity to have a definitive curative therapy within validated criteria.