首页 > 最新文献

Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Investigation of Respiratory Pathogens Responsible for Coinfection in COVID-19 Patients 调查导致 COVID-19 患者合并感染的呼吸道病原体
Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.36519/kd.2024.4769
Sabiha Salar-Gül, Nurullah Çiftçi, Hatice Türk-Dagı, Uğur Arslan
{"title":"Investigation of Respiratory Pathogens Responsible for Coinfection in COVID-19 Patients","authors":"Sabiha Salar-Gül, Nurullah Çiftçi, Hatice Türk-Dagı, Uğur Arslan","doi":"10.36519/kd.2024.4769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2024.4769","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141796703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 Pandemic Estimated End Date in Turkey 2019冠状病毒病大流行在土耳其的预计结束日期
Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.3704
Sare Başağa, Zeynep Ture, Gamze Kalın Unver, G. Zararsiz, Orhan Yıldız, Bilge Aygen
Background: Since the New Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) can also be spread by asymptomatic individuals, identifying asymptomatic carriers is a key point in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. With this study, it was aimed to draw attention to the COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test positivity rate sent before the operation / interventional procedure in asymptomatic individuals and to determine an estimated time about the decay time of the pandemic.Methods: All patients over the age of 18 who were sent COVID-19 PCR test before the operation or interventional procedure between July 1 and October 31, 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the periods when the peak was experienced or not.Results: 1070 patients were included in the study. PCR positivity was detected in 55 (5.14%) of the patients. The mean case incidence rate was 0.76% (2/263) in the months when the study was conducted and there was no COVID-19 peak, and 6.57% (53/807) in the months when the peak was observed. These rates were taken as reference for the months with and without peak. The time to reach 67%, which is accepted as the herd immunity limit, was calculated by adding 6.57% to the months corresponding to peak periods with 20-day periods starting from April 1, and the rate of 0.76% to the other months. Since there were two peaks after April 2020, the mass immunity rate reached until today has been calculated . If no COVID-19 peak occurs since this date, the possible pandemic attenuation time was determined as March 2022, and if the only peak occurs, May 2021.Conclusions: The incidence fluctuates with the restrictions, the risk of re-infection, the virüs being open to new mutations, and the initiation of vaccination programs make it difficult to predict the pandemic attenuation time.Key Words: COVID-19, SARS-COV-2, asymptomatic, herd immunity
背景:由于新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)也可以通过无症状个体传播,因此识别无症状感染者是抗击新冠肺炎大流行的关键。通过本研究,旨在引起对无症状个体手术/介入手术前发送的COVID-19聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测阳性率的关注,并确定大流行衰减时间的估计时间。方法:选取2020年7月1日至10月31日期间所有在手术前或介入手术前进行COVID-19 PCR检测的18岁以上患者。根据出现高峰的时间和未出现高峰的时间将患者分为两组。结果:1070例患者纳入研究。PCR阳性55例(5.14%)。无疫情高峰月份的平均发病率为0.76%(2/263),出现疫情高峰月份的平均发病率为6.57%(53/807)。这些比率是作为有高峰和没有高峰月份的参考。从4月1日开始的20天的高峰期对应月份加6.57%,其他月份加0.76%,计算出达到群体免疫极限67%的时间。由于在2020年4月之后出现了两次高峰,因此计算了迄今为止达到的群体免疫率。如果自此日期以来没有出现COVID-19高峰,则确定可能的大流行衰减时间为2022年3月,如果出现唯一的高峰,则确定为2021年5月。结论:发病率随限制、再感染风险、病毒对新突变的开放以及疫苗接种计划的启动而波动,使大流行衰减时间难以预测。关键词:COVID-19, SARS-COV-2,无症状,群体免疫
{"title":"COVID-19 Pandemic Estimated End Date in Turkey","authors":"Sare Başağa, Zeynep Ture, Gamze Kalın Unver, G. Zararsiz, Orhan Yıldız, Bilge Aygen","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.3704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.3704","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since the New Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) can also be spread by asymptomatic individuals, identifying asymptomatic carriers is a key point in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. With this study, it was aimed to draw attention to the COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test positivity rate sent before the operation / interventional procedure in asymptomatic individuals and to determine an estimated time about the decay time of the pandemic.\u0000\u0000Methods: All patients over the age of 18 who were sent COVID-19 PCR test before the operation or interventional procedure between July 1 and October 31, 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the periods when the peak was experienced or not.\u0000\u0000Results: 1070 patients were included in the study. PCR positivity was detected in 55 (5.14%) of the patients. The mean case incidence rate was 0.76% (2/263) in the months when the study was conducted and there was no COVID-19 peak, and 6.57% (53/807) in the months when the peak was observed. These rates were taken as reference for the months with and without peak. The time to reach 67%, which is accepted as the herd immunity limit, was calculated by adding 6.57% to the months corresponding to peak periods with 20-day periods starting from April 1, and the rate of 0.76% to the other months. Since there were two peaks after April 2020, the mass immunity rate reached until today has been calculated . If no COVID-19 peak occurs since this date, the possible pandemic attenuation time was determined as March 2022, and if the only peak occurs, May 2021.\u0000\u0000Conclusions: The incidence fluctuates with the restrictions, the risk of re-infection, the virüs being open to new mutations, and the initiation of vaccination programs make it difficult to predict the pandemic attenuation time.\u0000\u0000Key Words: COVID-19, SARS-COV-2, asymptomatic, herd immunity","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84143881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Risk Factors of Mortality in Patients with Bloodstream Infections Due to Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae 耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染患者死亡的危险因素
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.10
E. Eren, A. Ulu-Kilic, Zeynep Türe, F. Cevahir, H. Kılıç, Emine Alp-Meşe
Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) is among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections worldwide and causes serious and life-threatening infections. Treatment options are very limited for blood stream infections (BSIs) and prognosis is poor due to increasing multi-drug resistance. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for the mortality due to CRKp-BSI. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital from September 2013 to October 2017. Patients (aged >16 years) with CRKp-BSI were included in this study. Data, including demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score on hospitalisation date, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CRKp, antibiotic treatment and outcome (30-day mortality) data were collected from the electronic medical records and microbiology databases. Results: A total of 82 patients with CRKP-BSIs were analysed. The median age was 54.5 years, and 48 (58.5%) of them were male. The median APACHE II score on hospitalisation was 14 (IQR 6-28) and CCI was 4.0 (IQR 0-12). Forty-six (56.1%) patients had ICU-acquired bacteremia and 36 (43.9%) had central-line associated bacteremia and 25 (30.5%) had primary bacteremia. Fifty (61.0%) patients had combination therapy, colistin/tigecycline (28%) was the most used antibiotic combination. The mortality of all patients was 56.1% (46/82) and 65.2% (30/46) in ICU patients. In univariate analysis, risk factors for the mortality of CRKp-BSI were high CCI, not having clinical response on the fifth day of treatment, high APACHE II score on hospitalisation and infection date and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for mortality was APACHE II score on infection day (OR: 1.190; 95% CI: 1.088-1.301). Treatment regimens and combination therapy vs. monotherapy were not found to be significantly associated with survival. In addition, MIC values of CRKp were not associated with mortality. Conclusions: Patients with CRKp-BSI had high mortality (56.1%). APACHE II score on infection day was significantly associated with mortality. The outcome was similar between patients receiving combination (54.3%) or monotherapy (45.7%).
目的:碳青霉烯耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKp)是全球医院获得性感染的主要原因之一,并导致严重和危及生命的感染。血流感染(bsi)的治疗选择非常有限,由于多药耐药性的增加,预后很差。本研究的目的是评估CRKp-BSI导致死亡的危险因素。方法:2013年9月至2017年10月在某大学医院进行回顾性研究。CRKp-BSI患者(年龄0 ~ 16岁)纳入本研究。从电子病历和微生物数据库中收集数据,包括人口统计数据、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、住院日期的急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分、CRKp的最低抑制浓度(MIC)、抗生素治疗和结局(30天死亡率)数据。结果:共分析了82例crkp - bsi患者。年龄中位数为54.5岁,男性48例(58.5%)。住院时APACHEⅱ评分中位数为14 (IQR 6-28), CCI为4.0 (IQR 0-12)。46例(56.1%)患者为icu获得性菌血症,36例(43.9%)为中央静脉相关菌血症,25例(30.5%)为原发性菌血症。50例(61.0%)患者采用联合治疗,粘菌素/替加环素(28%)是使用最多的抗生素联合治疗。所有患者的死亡率为56.1% (46/82),ICU患者死亡率为65.2%(30/46)。在单因素分析中,CRKp-BSI死亡率的危险因素为高CCI、治疗第5天无临床反应、住院和感染日期高APACHE II评分和多器官功能障碍综合征。在多因素分析中,最显著的死亡危险因素是感染当日APACHE II评分(OR: 1.190;95% ci: 1.088-1.301)。治疗方案和联合治疗与单一治疗未发现与生存率显著相关。此外,CRKp的MIC值与死亡率无关。结论:CRKp-BSI患者死亡率高(56.1%)。感染日APACHEⅱ评分与死亡率显著相关。接受联合治疗(54.3%)或单一治疗(45.7%)的患者的结果相似。
{"title":"Risk Factors of Mortality in Patients with Bloodstream Infections Due to Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae","authors":"E. Eren, A. Ulu-Kilic, Zeynep Türe, F. Cevahir, H. Kılıç, Emine Alp-Meşe","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.10","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) is among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections worldwide and causes serious and life-threatening infections. Treatment options are very limited for blood stream infections (BSIs) and prognosis is poor due to increasing multi-drug resistance. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for the mortality due to CRKp-BSI. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital from September 2013 to October 2017. Patients (aged >16 years) with CRKp-BSI were included in this study. Data, including demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score on hospitalisation date, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CRKp, antibiotic treatment and outcome (30-day mortality) data were collected from the electronic medical records and microbiology databases. Results: A total of 82 patients with CRKP-BSIs were analysed. The median age was 54.5 years, and 48 (58.5%) of them were male. The median APACHE II score on hospitalisation was 14 (IQR 6-28) and CCI was 4.0 (IQR 0-12). Forty-six (56.1%) patients had ICU-acquired bacteremia and 36 (43.9%) had central-line associated bacteremia and 25 (30.5%) had primary bacteremia. Fifty (61.0%) patients had combination therapy, colistin/tigecycline (28%) was the most used antibiotic combination. The mortality of all patients was 56.1% (46/82) and 65.2% (30/46) in ICU patients. In univariate analysis, risk factors for the mortality of CRKp-BSI were high CCI, not having clinical response on the fifth day of treatment, high APACHE II score on hospitalisation and infection date and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for mortality was APACHE II score on infection day (OR: 1.190; 95% CI: 1.088-1.301). Treatment regimens and combination therapy vs. monotherapy were not found to be significantly associated with survival. In addition, MIC values of CRKp were not associated with mortality. Conclusions: Patients with CRKp-BSI had high mortality (56.1%). APACHE II score on infection day was significantly associated with mortality. The outcome was similar between patients receiving combination (54.3%) or monotherapy (45.7%).","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80262125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Fight Against Infectious Diseases from Ottoman Era to Republic of Turkey 从奥斯曼帝国时代到土耳其共和国的传染病防治
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.02
O. Töre
{"title":"Fight Against Infectious Diseases from Ottoman Era to Republic of Turkey","authors":"O. Töre","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.02","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76602148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Epidemiological Characteristics of COVID-19 Cases in A University Hospital in Turkey 土耳其某大学医院COVID-19病例的流行病学特征
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.11
Ayşe Gülsen Teker, A. Emecen, Selin Girgin, Hatice Şimşek-Keskin, N. Siyve, E. Sezgin, E. Basoğlu, Kübra Yıldırım-Karalar, Ö. Appak, A. Zeka, Gökçen Ömeroğlu, B. Ünal
Objective: It is important to put forward the characteristics of the COVID-19 cases to fight the disease effectively. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases in Turkey. And also to determine the risk factors associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the characteristics of the confirmed COVID-19 cases who applied to a University Hospital in Turkey between March 19th and June 11th, 2020, were analyzed. Variables such as epidemic trend, case fatality rate, need for hospitalization, ICU admission rate, and ICU mortality were calculated. In addition, risk factors affecting ICU admission and death were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: 19.8% of 654 cases participating in the study were asymptomatic at admission. ICU admission rate was 7.6% and case fatality rate found to be 7.8%. Age, male gender, and cancer were associated with ICU admission. Each 1-unit increase in age increased ICU admissions by 8% (OR: 1.08; CI: 1.06-1.10). Men had a 2.71 times higher risk of ICU admission (OR: 2.71; CI: 1.37-5.39); and cancer patients showed 3.72 (OR: 3.72; CI: 1.35-10.20) times more ICU admissions (p<0.05). Age, cancer, and ICU admission were associated with death. Each 1-unit increase in age increased the risk of death by 10% (OR: 1.10; CI: 1.06-1.15). The risk of death was found to be 5.22 times higher in cancer patients (OR: 5.22; GA: 1.09-24.89) and 87.42 times higher in those admitted to ICU (OR: 87.42; GA: 30.15-153.46) (p<0.05). Conclusions: It was revealed that the course of the disease worsens, and deaths increase with age. Male gender has been associated with the increased need for intensive care. Cancer was significantly associated both with ICU admission and death. Attention should be paid to the groups of elderly, men and those with a comorbidity. More detailed studies with larger samples are of critical importance in fighting against the pandemic. Key Words: Turkey, COVID-19, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, epidemiology.
目的:提出新冠肺炎病例特征,对有效防治新冠肺炎具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定土耳其COVID-19病例的流行病学特征。并确定与重症监护病房(ICU)入院和死亡相关的危险因素。方法:采用横断面研究方法,分析2020年3月19日至6月11日在土耳其某大学医院就诊的新冠肺炎确诊病例的特征。计算流行趋势、病死率、住院需求、ICU入院率、ICU死亡率等变量。此外,通过logistic回归分析确定影响ICU住院和死亡的危险因素。结果:654例患者入院时无症状者占19.8%。住院率为7.6%,病死率为7.8%。年龄、男性和癌症与ICU住院有关。年龄每增加1个单位,ICU入院率增加8% (OR: 1.08;CI: 1.06-1.10)。男性进入ICU的风险是女性的2.71倍(OR: 2.71;CI: 1.37 ~ 5.39),癌症患者进入ICU的风险是女性的3.72倍(OR: 3.72;CI: 1.35 ~ 10.20) (p < 0.05)。年龄、癌症和ICU入院与死亡相关。年龄每增加1个单位,死亡风险增加10% (OR: 1.10;CI: 1.06-1.15)。肿瘤患者的死亡风险是ICU患者的5.22倍(OR: 5.22;GA: 1.09 ~ 24.89), ICU患者的死亡风险是ICU患者的87.42倍(OR: 87.42;GA: 30.15 ~ 153.46) (p < 0.05)。结论:本病病程加重,死亡人数随年龄增长而增加。男性与重症监护需求的增加有关。癌症与ICU住院和死亡均显著相关。应注意老年人、男性和有合并症的人群。以更大样本进行更详细的研究,对防治这一流行病至关重要。©2021,DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd。版权所有。
{"title":"Epidemiological Characteristics of COVID-19 Cases in A University Hospital in Turkey","authors":"Ayşe Gülsen Teker, A. Emecen, Selin Girgin, Hatice Şimşek-Keskin, N. Siyve, E. Sezgin, E. Basoğlu, Kübra Yıldırım-Karalar, Ö. Appak, A. Zeka, Gökçen Ömeroğlu, B. Ünal","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.11","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: It is important to put forward the characteristics of the COVID-19 cases to fight the disease effectively. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases in Turkey. And also to determine the risk factors associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the characteristics of the confirmed COVID-19 cases who applied to a University Hospital in Turkey between March 19th and June 11th, 2020, were analyzed. Variables such as epidemic trend, case fatality rate, need for hospitalization, ICU admission rate, and ICU mortality were calculated. In addition, risk factors affecting ICU admission and death were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: 19.8% of 654 cases participating in the study were asymptomatic at admission. ICU admission rate was 7.6% and case fatality rate found to be 7.8%. Age, male gender, and cancer were associated with ICU admission. Each 1-unit increase in age increased ICU admissions by 8% (OR: 1.08; CI: 1.06-1.10). Men had a 2.71 times higher risk of ICU admission (OR: 2.71; CI: 1.37-5.39); and cancer patients showed 3.72 (OR: 3.72; CI: 1.35-10.20) times more ICU admissions (p<0.05). Age, cancer, and ICU admission were associated with death. Each 1-unit increase in age increased the risk of death by 10% (OR: 1.10; CI: 1.06-1.15). The risk of death was found to be 5.22 times higher in cancer patients (OR: 5.22; GA: 1.09-24.89) and 87.42 times higher in those admitted to ICU (OR: 87.42; GA: 30.15-153.46) (p<0.05). Conclusions: It was revealed that the course of the disease worsens, and deaths increase with age. Male gender has been associated with the increased need for intensive care. Cancer was significantly associated both with ICU admission and death. Attention should be paid to the groups of elderly, men and those with a comorbidity. More detailed studies with larger samples are of critical importance in fighting against the pandemic. Key Words: Turkey, COVID-19, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, epidemiology.","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91011641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Evaluation of the Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains to Various Antibiotics 金黄色葡萄球菌对多种抗生素的敏感性评价
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.12
Çiğdem Arabacı, B. Uzun
Objective: Staphylococcus aureus continues to be a major health problem due to widespread methicillin resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility to various antibiotics of 100 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 100 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains isolated from various clinical samples between January 2016 and November 2019. Methods: Gradient test strips were used to test the susceptibilities of isolates to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. The susceptibilities to other antibiotics were determined by automated system and evaluated based on EUCAST recommendations. Results: Seventy five percent of MRSA strains and 66% of MSSA strains included in the study were isolated from inpatients and 40% of MRSA and 21% of MSSA strains were isolated from intensive care patients. Isolates were obtained from tissue-abscess, blood, sterile body fluid, deep tracheal aspirate and sputum, urine, and catheter tip cultures, respectively. We did not detect S. aureus resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in our study. Vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid MIC50/MIC90 values for MSSA strains were found to be 1/1.5 µg/ml, 0.75/1.5 µg/mL, 0.75/1 µg/mL and 1.5/2 µg/mL, 1.5/2 µg/mL, 0.75/1.5 µg/mL for MRSA strains, respectively. Based on MIC90 values, linezolid was 1.3 times more effective than vancomycin and 2 times more effective than teicoplanin in MRSA strains; linezolid was 1.5 times more effective than vancomycin and teicoplanin in MSSA strains. MRSA strains showed high resistance rates to all antibiotics, except daptomycin, tigecycline, cotrimoxazole and fusidic acid. All antibiotics were found to be highly effective in MSSA strains. Conclusions: MIC values of glycopeptides in MSSA isolates were found to be close to MIC values of MRSA isolates. Regarding the MIC90 values, linezolid was found to be more effective than glycopeptides. All other antibiotics were highly effective in MSSA strains
目的:由于广泛的甲氧西林耐药性,金黄色葡萄球菌仍然是一个主要的健康问题。本研究的目的是确定2016年1月至2019年11月从不同临床样本中分离的100株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和100株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)对各种抗生素的敏感性。方法:采用梯度试纸法检测分离株对万古霉素、替柯planin和利奈唑胺的敏感性。对其他抗生素的敏感性采用自动化系统检测,并根据EUCAST建议进行评估。结果:纳入研究的75%的MRSA菌株和66%的MSSA菌株来自住院患者,40%的MRSA菌株和21%的MSSA菌株来自重症监护患者。分别从组织脓肿、血液、无菌体液、深气管抽吸液和痰、尿液和导管尖端培养中获得分离株。本研究未发现金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素、替可普宁和利奈唑胺耐药。万古霉素、替柯普兰和利奈唑胺对MSSA菌株的MIC50/MIC90值分别为1/1.5µg/ml、0.75/1.5µg/ml、0.75/1µg/ml和对MRSA菌株的1.5/2µg/ml、1.5/2µg/ml、0.75/1.5µg/ml。根据MIC90值,利奈唑胺对MRSA菌株的有效性是万古霉素的1.3倍,是替柯planin的2倍;利奈唑胺对MSSA菌株的治疗效果是万古霉素和替可普宁的1.5倍。MRSA菌株对除达托霉素、替加环素、复方新诺明和夫西地酸外的所有抗生素均有较高的耐药率。所有抗生素均对MSSA菌株有效。结论:发现MSSA分离株糖肽的MIC值与MRSA分离株的MIC值接近。关于MIC90值,利奈唑胺被发现比糖肽更有效。其他抗生素均对MSSA菌株有效
{"title":"Evaluation of the Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains to Various Antibiotics","authors":"Çiğdem Arabacı, B. Uzun","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.12","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Staphylococcus aureus continues to be a major health problem due to widespread methicillin resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility to various antibiotics of 100 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 100 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains isolated from various clinical samples between January 2016 and November 2019. Methods: Gradient test strips were used to test the susceptibilities of isolates to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. The susceptibilities to other antibiotics were determined by automated system and evaluated based on EUCAST recommendations. Results: Seventy five percent of MRSA strains and 66% of MSSA strains included in the study were isolated from inpatients and 40% of MRSA and 21% of MSSA strains were isolated from intensive care patients. Isolates were obtained from tissue-abscess, blood, sterile body fluid, deep tracheal aspirate and sputum, urine, and catheter tip cultures, respectively. We did not detect S. aureus resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in our study. Vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid MIC50/MIC90 values for MSSA strains were found to be 1/1.5 µg/ml, 0.75/1.5 µg/mL, 0.75/1 µg/mL and 1.5/2 µg/mL, 1.5/2 µg/mL, 0.75/1.5 µg/mL for MRSA strains, respectively. Based on MIC90 values, linezolid was 1.3 times more effective than vancomycin and 2 times more effective than teicoplanin in MRSA strains; linezolid was 1.5 times more effective than vancomycin and teicoplanin in MSSA strains. MRSA strains showed high resistance rates to all antibiotics, except daptomycin, tigecycline, cotrimoxazole and fusidic acid. All antibiotics were found to be highly effective in MSSA strains. Conclusions: MIC values of glycopeptides in MSSA isolates were found to be close to MIC values of MRSA isolates. Regarding the MIC90 values, linezolid was found to be more effective than glycopeptides. All other antibiotics were highly effective in MSSA strains","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88843281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in Intensive Care Unit and Risk Factors for Carbapenem Resistance 重症监护病房肺炎克雷伯菌感染及碳青霉烯耐药的危险因素
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.05
Z. Yeşilbağ, Yasemin Tekdöş-Şeker, S. Şenoğlu, G. Hergünsel
Objective: Klebsiella pneumoniae infections have been a problem in intensive care units (ICU) in recent years due to multi-drug resistance. In this study, it was aimed to analyze K. pneumoniae infections in ICU, determine distribution of carbapenem resistance rates and risk factors. Methods: Nosocomial infections (NI) with K. pneumoniae between January 2017-January 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. In cases with recurrent K. pneumoniae infection, only the first episode was included. Results: K. pneumoniae infections were developed in a total of 78 patients. Bloodstream infections (BSI) were the most common (51.3%), followed by pneumonia (41%) and urinary tract infections (7.7%). Among BSI cases, 52.5% were associated with central venous catheter (CVC) and 81.2% of pneumonia cases were ventilator-associated pneumonia (VIP). It was observed that while the proportion of BSI was gradually decreasing in years, pneumonia rates have increased. Among BSI, it was observed that the rate of CVC-related BSI was increased from 33.3% in 2017 to 62.5% in 2019. Carbapenem resistance was 52.6% and colistin resistance was 17.9% in K. pneumoniae isolates and both increased over 3 years. When carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections were compared with carbapenem-sensitive K. pneumoniae infections, the independent risk factors associated with carbapenem resistance were found to be carbapenem use (p=0.008, OR: 8.45, 95% CI: 1.76-40.64), prior NI developing with different microorganism (p=0.005, OR: 8.70, 95% CI: 1.91-39.65) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use (p=0.04, OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.06-16.67). Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections are gradually increasing in ICUs, and colistin resistance has started to be observed recently. Our study showed that carbapenems are independent risk factors in carbapenem resistance and suggested that carbapenem use should be restricted in our unit. It is important for each center to reveal its own data of frequency and resistance, in order to decrease infection rates with the infection control measures and determine the antibiotic using policies.
目的:肺炎克雷伯菌的多重耐药是近年来重症监护病房(ICU)感染的一大难题。本研究旨在分析ICU肺炎克雷伯菌感染情况,确定碳青霉烯类药物耐药率分布及危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年1月期间肺炎克雷伯菌的医院感染情况。在复发性肺炎克雷伯菌感染的病例中,仅包括第一次发作。结果:78例患者发生肺炎克雷伯菌感染。血流感染(BSI)最为常见(51.3%),其次是肺炎(41%)和尿路感染(7.7%)。BSI病例中,52.5%与中心静脉导管(CVC)相关,81.2%为呼吸机相关性肺炎(VIP)。观察到,虽然BSI的比例逐年下降,但肺炎的发病率却有所上升。在BSI中,cvc相关的BSI比例从2017年的33.3%上升到2019年的62.5%。肺炎克雷伯菌对碳青霉烯类和粘菌素的耐药率分别为52.6%和17.9%,且在3年内均呈上升趋势。将碳青霉烯耐药肺炎克雷伯菌感染与碳青霉烯敏感肺炎克雷伯菌感染进行比较,发现与碳青霉烯耐药相关的独立危险因素为碳青霉烯的使用(p=0.008, OR: 8.45, 95% CI: 1.76 ~ 40.64)、不同微生物发生NI (p=0.005, OR: 8.70, 95% CI: 1.91 ~ 39.65)和总肠外营养(TPN)的使用(p=0.04, OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.06 ~ 16.67)。结论:icu耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌感染逐渐增多,近期开始出现粘菌素耐药。我们的研究表明碳青霉烯类药物是碳青霉烯类药物耐药性的独立危险因素,建议我们单位应限制碳青霉烯类药物的使用。各中心应及时公布各自的感染频次和耐药数据,以便采取有效的感染控制措施降低感染率,制定合理的抗生素使用政策。
{"title":"Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in Intensive Care Unit and Risk Factors for Carbapenem Resistance","authors":"Z. Yeşilbağ, Yasemin Tekdöş-Şeker, S. Şenoğlu, G. Hergünsel","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.05","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Klebsiella pneumoniae infections have been a problem in intensive care units (ICU) in recent years due to multi-drug resistance. In this study, it was aimed to analyze K. pneumoniae infections in ICU, determine distribution of carbapenem resistance rates and risk factors. Methods: Nosocomial infections (NI) with K. pneumoniae between January 2017-January 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. In cases with recurrent K. pneumoniae infection, only the first episode was included. Results: K. pneumoniae infections were developed in a total of 78 patients. Bloodstream infections (BSI) were the most common (51.3%), followed by pneumonia (41%) and urinary tract infections (7.7%). Among BSI cases, 52.5% were associated with central venous catheter (CVC) and 81.2% of pneumonia cases were ventilator-associated pneumonia (VIP). It was observed that while the proportion of BSI was gradually decreasing in years, pneumonia rates have increased. Among BSI, it was observed that the rate of CVC-related BSI was increased from 33.3% in 2017 to 62.5% in 2019. Carbapenem resistance was 52.6% and colistin resistance was 17.9% in K. pneumoniae isolates and both increased over 3 years. When carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections were compared with carbapenem-sensitive K. pneumoniae infections, the independent risk factors associated with carbapenem resistance were found to be carbapenem use (p=0.008, OR: 8.45, 95% CI: 1.76-40.64), prior NI developing with different microorganism (p=0.005, OR: 8.70, 95% CI: 1.91-39.65) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use (p=0.04, OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.06-16.67). Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections are gradually increasing in ICUs, and colistin resistance has started to be observed recently. Our study showed that carbapenems are independent risk factors in carbapenem resistance and suggested that carbapenem use should be restricted in our unit. It is important for each center to reveal its own data of frequency and resistance, in order to decrease infection rates with the infection control measures and determine the antibiotic using policies.","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85680627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Evaluation of Hepatitis B Seroprevalence and Hepatitis B Reactivation Frequency in Rheumatology Patients Using Biological Drug Therapy 使用生物药物治疗的风湿病患者乙型肝炎血清阳性率和乙型肝炎再激活频率的评估
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.08
K. Ayar, A. Asan, T. D. Hattatoğlu
Objective: The presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients using biological drug therapy may cause reactivation. There is insufficient data on the frequency of HBV reactivation, especially after the use of new biological drugs such as tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and secukinumab. This study aims to examine HBV seroprevalence in rheumatology patients using biological drug therapy and investigate the frequency of reactivation in patients with previous HBV infection. Methods: The charts of 275 patients who were followed up in the rheumatology department and used biological drug therapy were examined to evaluate the HBsAg, anti-HBc IgG, and anti-HBs test results. The frequency of reactivation was investigated by examining the HBV DNA test results before and after the biological drug therapy and the alanin aminotransferase test results were checked throughout the biological drug therapy in anti-HBc IgG-positive patients. Results: Among the patients, HBsAg was positive in 0.4%, anti-HBs in 34.4%, and anti-HBc IgG in 25.1%. The reactivation frequency was investigated in 53 biological drug therapies applied in 41 patients. The use of prophylactic antiviral drugs, where reactivation was evaluated, was found as 28.6% in TNF inhibitors, 100% in rituximab, 75.0% in tofacitinib, 0% in tocilizumab, 50% in abatacept, and 0% in secukinumab. Reactivation was detected in one of the fifty-three biological drug therapies. The reactivation case was a patient with isolated anti-HBc IgG and initial HBV DNA tests positive, using tocilizumab and cortisone, and not using entecavir prophylactic treatment regularly. Conclusions: The frequency of previous HBV infection is high in patients using biological therapy. Although prophylactic antiviral drug therapy for HBV has not been used frequently during the use of biological drug therapies other than rituximab in anti-HBc IgG positive patients, reactivation is rare. The risk of reactivation may be low in those receiving tofacitinib and secukinumab therapy and high in those receiving tocilizumab therapy.
目的:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染在使用生物药物治疗的患者中可能引起再激活。关于HBV再激活频率的数据不足,特别是在使用新的生物药物如托法替尼、托珠单抗和secukinumab后。本研究旨在检测使用生物药物治疗的风湿病患者的HBV血清阳性率,并调查既往HBV感染患者的再激活频率。方法:对275例风湿内科随访并采用生物药物治疗的患者进行图表分析,评价其HBsAg、抗hbc IgG、抗hbs检测结果。通过检测抗hbc igg阳性患者在生物药物治疗前后的HBV DNA检测结果,并在整个生物药物治疗过程中检查丙氨酸转氨酶检测结果,调查再激活的频率。结果:患者中HBsAg阳性率为0.4%,抗- hbs阳性率为34.4%,抗- hbc IgG阳性率为25.1%。对41例患者53种生物药物治疗的再激活频率进行了研究。预防性抗病毒药物的使用(评估再激活)在TNF抑制剂中为28.6%,在利妥昔单抗中为100%,在托法替尼中为75.0%,在托珠单抗中为0%,在阿巴接受中为50%,在secukinumab中为0%。在53种生物药物疗法中的一种中检测到再激活。再激活病例为分离抗hbc IgG和初始HBV DNA检测阳性的患者,使用托珠单抗和可的松,未定期使用恩替卡韦预防性治疗。结论:接受生物治疗的患者既往HBV感染的发生率较高。尽管在抗hbc IgG阳性患者中,除了美罗华外,在使用生物药物治疗期间,对HBV的预防性抗病毒药物治疗并不经常使用,但再激活是罕见的。再激活的风险在接受托法替尼和secukinumab治疗的患者中可能较低,而在接受托珠单抗治疗的患者中可能较高。
{"title":"Evaluation of Hepatitis B Seroprevalence and Hepatitis B Reactivation Frequency in Rheumatology Patients Using Biological Drug Therapy","authors":"K. Ayar, A. Asan, T. D. Hattatoğlu","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.08","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients using biological drug therapy may cause reactivation. There is insufficient data on the frequency of HBV reactivation, especially after the use of new biological drugs such as tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and secukinumab. This study aims to examine HBV seroprevalence in rheumatology patients using biological drug therapy and investigate the frequency of reactivation in patients with previous HBV infection. Methods: The charts of 275 patients who were followed up in the rheumatology department and used biological drug therapy were examined to evaluate the HBsAg, anti-HBc IgG, and anti-HBs test results. The frequency of reactivation was investigated by examining the HBV DNA test results before and after the biological drug therapy and the alanin aminotransferase test results were checked throughout the biological drug therapy in anti-HBc IgG-positive patients. Results: Among the patients, HBsAg was positive in 0.4%, anti-HBs in 34.4%, and anti-HBc IgG in 25.1%. The reactivation frequency was investigated in 53 biological drug therapies applied in 41 patients. The use of prophylactic antiviral drugs, where reactivation was evaluated, was found as 28.6% in TNF inhibitors, 100% in rituximab, 75.0% in tofacitinib, 0% in tocilizumab, 50% in abatacept, and 0% in secukinumab. Reactivation was detected in one of the fifty-three biological drug therapies. The reactivation case was a patient with isolated anti-HBc IgG and initial HBV DNA tests positive, using tocilizumab and cortisone, and not using entecavir prophylactic treatment regularly. Conclusions: The frequency of previous HBV infection is high in patients using biological therapy. Although prophylactic antiviral drug therapy for HBV has not been used frequently during the use of biological drug therapies other than rituximab in anti-HBc IgG positive patients, reactivation is rare. The risk of reactivation may be low in those receiving tofacitinib and secukinumab therapy and high in those receiving tocilizumab therapy.","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83366932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contact Tracing in the Context of COVID-19: Ethical Issues and Assessment COVID-19背景下的接触者追踪:伦理问题和评估
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.04
Adem Az, Zeynep Afra Akbıyık-Az
The COVID-19 outbreak spread like a forest fire in the first quarter of 2020. Until September, more than 26 million people were affected by this epidemic. It has been 9 months since the first case was seen. However, a curative treatment method or vaccine has not been developed yet. Today, the only approach that can prevent the outbreak is classical epidemic control approaches such as hygiene, case isolation, contact tracing and quarantine. Contact tracing aims to reduce the spread of the epidemic by trying to analyze the potential transmission routes of the infection at the individual level. In addition, it will be possible to prevent official measures such as the curfew taken to prevent the epidemic from spreading. However, when considering ways of communication between people, the epidemic knows no boundaries. Mobile applications and artificial intelligence can be successful in analyzing this contact chain. Even if protecting human life is the highest degree moral duty, these methods contain many ethical problems. The most violated ethical values because of these practices are privacy, confidentiality of information, civil freedom and autonomy. In this study, we will try to analyze the ethical problems that arise with contact tracing mobile applications in the context of COVID-19. © 2021, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.
新冠肺炎疫情在2020年第一季度像森林大火一样蔓延。截至9月,已有2 600多万人受到这一流行病的影响。自发现首例病例以来已过去9个月。但是,目前还没有开发出治疗方法或疫苗。今天,唯一能够防止疫情爆发的方法是传统的流行病控制方法,如卫生、病例隔离、接触者追踪和隔离。接触者追踪旨在通过在个人层面分析感染的潜在传播途径来减少流行病的传播。此外,将有可能阻止为防止流行病蔓延而采取的宵禁等官方措施。然而,从人与人之间的交流方式来看,疫情是无国界的。移动应用程序和人工智能可以成功地分析这个联系链。即使保护人类生命是最高程度的道德责任,这些方法也包含许多伦理问题。由于这些做法,最受侵犯的伦理价值是隐私、信息保密、公民自由和自治。在本研究中,我们将尝试分析在COVID-19背景下接触者追踪移动应用程序出现的伦理问题。©2021,DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd。版权所有。
{"title":"Contact Tracing in the Context of COVID-19: Ethical Issues and Assessment","authors":"Adem Az, Zeynep Afra Akbıyık-Az","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.04","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 outbreak spread like a forest fire in the first quarter of 2020. Until September, more than 26 million people were affected by this epidemic. It has been 9 months since the first case was seen. However, a curative treatment method or vaccine has not been developed yet. Today, the only approach that can prevent the outbreak is classical epidemic control approaches such as hygiene, case isolation, contact tracing and quarantine. Contact tracing aims to reduce the spread of the epidemic by trying to analyze the potential transmission routes of the infection at the individual level. In addition, it will be possible to prevent official measures such as the curfew taken to prevent the epidemic from spreading. However, when considering ways of communication between people, the epidemic knows no boundaries. Mobile applications and artificial intelligence can be successful in analyzing this contact chain. Even if protecting human life is the highest degree moral duty, these methods contain many ethical problems. The most violated ethical values because of these practices are privacy, confidentiality of information, civil freedom and autonomy. In this study, we will try to analyze the ethical problems that arise with contact tracing mobile applications in the context of COVID-19. © 2021, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81127910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112
A Rare Form of Tuberculosis: Cutaneous Tuberculosis Cases 一种罕见的结核病:皮肤结核病例
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.36519/KD.2021.13
Ş. Sümer, Nazlım Aktug-Demir, O. Ural, Fatma Çölkesen
Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that can affect all organs and tissues. The clinical forms of primary cutaneous tuberculosis are tuberculosis primary complex (tuberculosis chancre) and tuberculosis cutis miliaris (miliary cutaneous tuberculosis). Secondary cutaneous tuberculosis includes lupus vulgaris, tuberculosis cutis verrucosa, scrofuloderma, tuberculosis cutis officials, and metastatic tubercular abscesses. The most common form is lupus vulgaris. Cutaneous tuberculosis is a rare form of tuberculosis presenting with nonspecific lesions. It is difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific clinical characteristics thus it can be confused with many other diseases. In this paper, we reviewed five patients with cutaneous tuberculosis who presented to our clinic within the past one year and we aimed to emphasize that cutaneous tuberculosis can manifest in different clinical forms.
结核病是一种由结核分枝杆菌引起的传染病,可影响所有器官和组织。原发性皮肤结核的临床形式为原发性复杂结核(下疳结核)和军事性皮肤结核(军性皮肤结核)。继发性皮肤结核包括寻常性狼疮、疣状皮肤结核、硬皮病、皮肤结核和转移性结核性脓肿。最常见的形式是寻常性狼疮。皮肤结核是一种罕见的结核形式,表现为非特异性病变。由于其非特异性临床特征,诊断困难,容易与许多其他疾病混淆。在本文中,我们回顾了在过去的一年中在我诊所就诊的5例皮肤结核患者,我们的目的是强调皮肤结核可以表现为不同的临床形式。
{"title":"A Rare Form of Tuberculosis: Cutaneous Tuberculosis Cases","authors":"Ş. Sümer, Nazlım Aktug-Demir, O. Ural, Fatma Çölkesen","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.13","url":null,"abstract":"Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that can affect all organs and tissues. The clinical forms of primary cutaneous tuberculosis are tuberculosis primary complex (tuberculosis chancre) and tuberculosis cutis miliaris (miliary cutaneous tuberculosis). Secondary cutaneous tuberculosis includes lupus vulgaris, tuberculosis cutis verrucosa, scrofuloderma, tuberculosis cutis officials, and metastatic tubercular abscesses. The most common form is lupus vulgaris. Cutaneous tuberculosis is a rare form of tuberculosis presenting with nonspecific lesions. It is difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific clinical characteristics thus it can be confused with many other diseases. In this paper, we reviewed five patients with cutaneous tuberculosis who presented to our clinic within the past one year and we aimed to emphasize that cutaneous tuberculosis can manifest in different clinical forms.","PeriodicalId":17826,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87225200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Klimik Dergisi/Klimik Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1