Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy最新文献

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of medial meniscus posterior root avulsion (MMPRA) before and after surgical treatment on the biomechanics of the knee joint, including suture repair forces during daily and crutch-assisted gait movements.

Methods: MMPRA were investigated in eight human cadaver knee joint specimens by a dynamic knee joint simulator with daily (normal gait, gait with additional rotational movement, standing up, sitting down) and rehabilitation-associated movements (crutch-assisted gait with limited flexion range of motion [30°] and 30% [toe-touch weight-bearing, TTWB] and 50% of body weight [partial weight-bearing, PWB]) with simulated physiologic muscle forces. Each specimen was tested in intact, torn and repaired (transtibial suture) state. The biomechanical parameters were: medial mean contact pressure and area, knee joint kinematics, medial displacement of the posterior meniscus horn and loading on the anchoring suture.

Results: Significant reduction of the contact area due to the avulsion was observed in all movements except for PWB and sitting down. MMPRA repair significantly increased the contact areas during all movements, bringing them to levels statistically indistinguishable from the initial state. MMPRA resulted in a medial displacement up to 12.8 mm (sitting down) and could be reattached with a residual displacement ranging from 0.7 mm (PWB) to 5.7 mm (standing up), all significantly (p < 0.001) reduced compared to the torn state. The mean peak anchoring suture load increased from TTWB (77 N), PWB (91 N) to normal gait (194 N), gait rotation (207 N), sitting (201 N; p < 0.01) and to standing up (232 N; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Surgical treatment of MMPRA allows restoration of physiological knee joint biomechanics. Crutch-assisted movements reduce the loading of the repair suture, thus likewise the risk for failure. From a biomechanical point of view, crutch-assisted movements are recommended for the early rehabilitation phase after MMPRA repair.

Level of evidence: Level V.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether additive autologous bone grafting (ABG) improves clinical outcome and survival in revision matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI) after failed cartilage repair (CR).

Methods: A retrospective, registry-based, matched-pair analysis was performed to compare patient-reported outcomes and survival in secondary M-ACI with or without additional bone grafting for focal full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee and to compare it with those in primary M-ACI. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, defect size and localization, and number of previous CRs. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was assessed over a follow-up period of 36 months. The patient acceptable symptomatic state, the clinical response rate and the survival of the subgroups were determined.

Results: A total of 818 patients were matched. Revision M-ACI (n = 238) with concomitant bone grafting was associated with significantly higher PRO as measured by KOOS (80.8 ± 16.8 vs. 72.0 ± 17.5, p = 0.032) and higher CRR (81.4% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.018) at 36 months compared to patients with revision M-ACI alone. KOOS and KOOS improvement in these patients did not differ from those who underwent primary M-ACI (p = n.s.). The combination of M-ACI and ABG resulted in a significantly higher KOOS at 36 months than M-ACI alone, regardless of whether bone marrow stimulation (89.6 ± 12.5 vs. 68.1 ± 17.9, p = 0.003) or ACI (82.6 ± 17.0 vs. 72.8 ± 16.0, p = 0.021) was performed before. Additional bone grafting results in equivalent survival rates at 7 years in secondary compared to primary M-ACI (83% vs. 84%, p = n.s.).

Conclusions: Regardless of the type of previous CR, additional bone grafting in secondary M-ACI improves the clinical outcome, response rate and survival at 36 months compared to M-ACI alone. Secondary M-ACI with ABG had comparable clinical response and survival rates to primary M-ACI. Therefore, subchondral bone should be treated even in cases of mild bone involvement in revision M-ACI.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Purpose: During kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the surgeon may need to rectify an over-resection of the medial, lateral or posterior tibia. This study tested the hypothesis that a bone graft taken from the tibial resection or patella and impacted beneath a tibial baseplate would heal, regardless of whether the tibial component and knee were in outlier ranges according to mechanical alignment (MA) criteria. The study also tested the hypothesis that the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) would improve beyond the substantial clinical benefit and that the source and thickness of the bone graft would not influence their improvement.

Methods: This retrospective study radiographically assessed the healing of a bone graft from the tibial resection (n = 19) or patella (n = 10) in 29 KA TKAs (18 females, mean age 65 years). The tibial component and knee alignment were categorized as in-range or outliers based on reported MA criteria for bone graft healing and implant survival. The one-sample t test identified differences in the improvement of the OKS and KOOS JR from their reported substantial clinical benefit of 16 and 20 points, respectively.

Results: At an average follow-up of 37 months, all bone grafts healed even though ≥55% of tibial components and 34% of knees were varus outliers according to MA criteria for bone healing and implant survival. Amongst the 29 patients, the mean OKS and KOOS JR improvements of 25 ± 11 and 47 ± 21 points, respectively, surpassed the threshold of their respective substantial clinical benefit (p < 0.01) and were not influenced by the bone graft's source and thickness (p ≥ 0.51).

Conclusions: During cemented KA TKA, the surgeon can use a bone graft from the tibial resection or patella to rectify a tibial over-resection. This technique led to consistent bone healing and improved outcome scores.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Purpose: While restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide a similar survivorship rate to mechanical alignment (MA) in the short term, no studies have reported on the long-term survivorship and function.

Methods: One hundred four consecutive cemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted using computer navigation and following the rKA principles proposed by Vendittoli were reviewed at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Implant revisions, reoperations and clinical outcomes were assessed using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), forgotten joint score (FJS), patients' satisfaction and joint perception questionnaires. Radiographs were analyzed to identify signs of osteolysis and implant loosening.

Results: Implant survivorship was 99.0% at a mean follow-up of 11.3 years (range: 10.3-12.9) with one early revision for instability. Patients perceived their TKA as natural or artificial without limitation in 50.0% of cases, and 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied with their TKA. The mean FJS was 67.6 (range: 0-100). The mean KOOS were as follows: pain 84.7 (range: 38-100), symptoms 85.5 (range: 46-100), function in daily activities 82.6 (range: 40-100), function in sport and recreation 35.2 (range: 0-100) and quality of life 79.1 (range: 0-100). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.

Conclusion: Cemented TKA implanted with the rKA alignment protocol demonstrated excellent long-term implant survivorship and is a safe alternative to MA to improve patient function and satisfaction.

Level of evidence: IV, continuous case series with no comparison group.

Purpose: To summarize the predictors of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal important change (MIC) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 5 January 2024. The authors adhered to PRISMA/R-AMSTAR guidelines, and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on statistical associations between predictive factors and PROMs were extracted. Inverse odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (reverse group comparison) were calculated when appropriate to ensure comparative consistency.

Results: Thirteen studies comprising 21,235 patients (48.1% female) were included (mean age 29.3 years). Eight studies comprising 3857 patients identified predictors of PASS, including lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (OR = 11.08, p = 0.01), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (OR range: 2.02-2.63, p ≤ 0.011), age over 30 (OR range: 1.37-2.28, p ≤ 0.02), male sex (OR range: 1.03-1.32, p ≤ 0.01) and higher pre-operative PROMs (OR range: 1.04-1.21). Eight studies comprising 18,069 patients identified negative predictors of MCID or MIC, including female sex (OR = 0.93, p = 0.034), absence of HT autografts (OR = 0.70, p < 0.0001), higher pre-operative PROMs (OR = 0.76-0.84, p ≤ 0.01), meniscectomy (OR = 0.67, p = 0.014) and collision sports (OR = 0.02-0.60, p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: Higher pre-operative PROMs, age over 30, male sex, LETs and HT autografts predicted PASS achievement. Lower pre-operative PROMs, male sex, non-collision sports, and lack of meniscectomies predicted MCID/MIC achievement. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the predictors of clinically significant post-ACLR outcomes, thus improving clinical decision-making and the management of patient expectations.

Level of evidence: Level IV.