首页 > 最新文献

Kidney Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
The Surprise Question in Hemodialysis, Frailty, Nutrition, Patient-reported Quality of Life, and All-Cause Mortality: The Osaka Dialysis Complication Study (ODCS) 血液透析、虚弱、营养、患者报告的生活质量和全因死亡率中的意外问题:大阪透析并发症研究(ODCS)
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100914
Tetsuo Shoji , Daijiro Kabata , Seiichi Kimura , Yuki Nagata , Katsuhito Mori , Shinya Nakatani , Hisako Fujii , Tomoaki Morioka , Masanori Emoto
<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>A response “no” (SQ-No) to the surprise question (SQ) of whether a clinician would be surprised if a dialysis patient died in the next 6 months is associated with a higher risk of all-cause death. It is uncertain what domains are intuitively assessed with the SQ. We hypothesized that the SQ would assess the patient’s frailty, malnutrition, or patient-perceived health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients on maintenance hemodialysis.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Participants</h3><div>A multicenter study including 994 patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Predictors</h3><div>(1) SQ answered by nurses; (2) frailty by modified Cardiovascular Health Study criteria; (3) malnutrition as evaluated by Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); and (4) patient-perceived health-related quality of life examined by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS).</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>All-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Cox proportional hazard models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median age and dialysis vintage were 66 and 5.9 years, respectively, 35.8% were women, and 39.6% had diabetic kidney disease. The prevalence of SQ-No and frailty was 19.7% and 45.9%. Median GNRI and SF-36 PCS scores were 96.3 and 36.9, respectively. During the 5-year follow-up, 247 patients died. SQ-No, being frail, low GNRI, and low SF-36 PCS were each significant predictors of a higher risk for mortality independent of potential confounders. SQ-No remained a significant predictor after further adjustment for frailty or GNRI, but SQ-No was no longer significant when adjusted for SF-36 PCS.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>We did not assess the agreement of responses to the SQ between different raters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The predictive ability of the SQ was closely related to SF-36 PCS in hemodialysis patients. Nurses’ answer to the SQ appears to assess the physical domain of patient-perceived health-related quality of life rather than objectively assessed frailty or malnutrition.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>“Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 6 months?” This question posed to a clinician is called the “surprise question” (SQ) and the answer “no” (SQ-No) has been shown to predict a higher risk of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We examined which domains are intuitively assessed with the SQ, such as frailty, malnutrition, and patient-perceived quality of life in a cohort of hemodialysis patients. We found that the association between the SQ response and mortality was independent of frailty and malnutrition but was closely related to the physical domain of patient-perceived quality of life. The results suggest that the SQ appears to assess the physical domain of patient-per
理由和ampamp; 目标对 "如果透析患者在未来 6 个月内死亡,临床医生是否会感到惊讶 "的惊讶问题(SQ)回答 "不会"(SQ-No)与较高的全因死亡风险有关。目前还不确定 SQ 可以直观地评估哪些领域。我们假设,在一组维持性血液透析患者中,SQ 将评估患者的虚弱、营养不良或患者感知的健康相关生活质量。预测因素(1) 护士回答的 SQ;(2) 根据修改后的心血管健康研究标准评估的虚弱程度;(3) 根据老年营养风险指数 (GNRI) 评估的营养不良程度;(4) 根据 36 项简表健康调查 (SF-36) 身体成分摘要 (PCS) 评估的患者感知的健康相关生活质量。结果全因死亡率。分析方法Cox比例危险模型。结果中位年龄和透析年份分别为66岁和5.9年,35.8%为女性,39.6%患有糖尿病肾病。SQ-No和虚弱的发生率分别为19.7%和45.9%。GNRI 和 SF-36 PCS 评分的中位数分别为 96.3 分和 36.9 分。在 5 年的随访中,有 247 名患者死亡。独立于潜在的混杂因素,SQ-No、体弱、低 GNRI 和低 SF-36 PCS 均可显著预测较高的死亡风险。在进一步调整虚弱程度或 GNRI 后,SQ-No 仍是一个重要的预测因子,但在调整 SF-36 PCS 后,SQ-No 不再重要。护士对 SQ 的回答似乎评估的是患者感知的健康相关生活质量中的生理领域,而不是客观评估的体弱或营养不良。向临床医生提出的这个问题被称为 "惊喜问题"(SQ),答案 "不"(SQ-No)已被证明可预测血液透析患者的较高死亡风险。我们在一组血液透析患者中研究了 SQ 可以直观评估的领域,如虚弱、营养不良和患者感知的生活质量。我们发现,SQ 反应与死亡率之间的关系与虚弱和营养不良无关,但与患者感知的生活质量的物理领域密切相关。结果表明,SQ 似乎是评估患者感知的健康相关生活质量中的身体领域,而不是客观评估的虚弱或营养不良。
{"title":"The Surprise Question in Hemodialysis, Frailty, Nutrition, Patient-reported Quality of Life, and All-Cause Mortality: The Osaka Dialysis Complication Study (ODCS)","authors":"Tetsuo Shoji ,&nbsp;Daijiro Kabata ,&nbsp;Seiichi Kimura ,&nbsp;Yuki Nagata ,&nbsp;Katsuhito Mori ,&nbsp;Shinya Nakatani ,&nbsp;Hisako Fujii ,&nbsp;Tomoaki Morioka ,&nbsp;Masanori Emoto","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100914","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100914","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Rationale &amp; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A response “no” (SQ-No) to the surprise question (SQ) of whether a clinician would be surprised if a dialysis patient died in the next 6 months is associated with a higher risk of all-cause death. It is uncertain what domains are intuitively assessed with the SQ. We hypothesized that the SQ would assess the patient’s frailty, malnutrition, or patient-perceived health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients on maintenance hemodialysis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Cohort study.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Setting &amp; Participants&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A multicenter study including 994 patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Japan.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Predictors&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;(1) SQ answered by nurses; (2) frailty by modified Cardiovascular Health Study criteria; (3) malnutrition as evaluated by Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); and (4) patient-perceived health-related quality of life examined by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Outcomes&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;All-cause mortality.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Analytical Approach&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Cox proportional hazard models.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Median age and dialysis vintage were 66 and 5.9 years, respectively, 35.8% were women, and 39.6% had diabetic kidney disease. The prevalence of SQ-No and frailty was 19.7% and 45.9%. Median GNRI and SF-36 PCS scores were 96.3 and 36.9, respectively. During the 5-year follow-up, 247 patients died. SQ-No, being frail, low GNRI, and low SF-36 PCS were each significant predictors of a higher risk for mortality independent of potential confounders. SQ-No remained a significant predictor after further adjustment for frailty or GNRI, but SQ-No was no longer significant when adjusted for SF-36 PCS.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We did not assess the agreement of responses to the SQ between different raters.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The predictive ability of the SQ was closely related to SF-36 PCS in hemodialysis patients. Nurses’ answer to the SQ appears to assess the physical domain of patient-perceived health-related quality of life rather than objectively assessed frailty or malnutrition.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;“Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 6 months?” This question posed to a clinician is called the “surprise question” (SQ) and the answer “no” (SQ-No) has been shown to predict a higher risk of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We examined which domains are intuitively assessed with the SQ, such as frailty, malnutrition, and patient-perceived quality of life in a cohort of hemodialysis patients. We found that the association between the SQ response and mortality was independent of frailty and malnutrition but was closely related to the physical domain of patient-perceived quality of life. The results suggest that the SQ appears to assess the physical domain of patient-per","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142594064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nephroprotective Effects of Cilastatin in People at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 西司他丁对急性肾损伤高危人群的肾保护作用:系统回顾与元分析
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913
Dilaram Acharya , Fanar Ghanim , Tyrone G. Harrison , Tayler Dawn Scory , Nusrat Shommu , Paul E. Ronksley , Meghan J. Elliott , David Collister , Neesh Pannu , Matthew T. James
<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem’s renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Study Populations</h3><div>People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Studies</h3><div>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->531<!--> <!-->patients; 5 observational studies, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26.5%), with consistent results observed in RCTs (3 RCTs, RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.77; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%) and observational studies (4 studies, RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%). Based on results from 6 studies, serum creatinine concentration was lower following treatment with imipenem-cilastatin than comparators (weighted mean difference in serum creatinine<!--> <!-->−0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.21 to<!--> <!-->−0.07; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). The overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity of the results, high risk of bias, and indirectness among the identified studies.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received compar
理由与amp; 目的西司他丁是一种近端肾小管药物代谢抑制剂,在动物体内具有保护肾脏的作用。在人体中,它与抗生素亚胺培南联合使用,可阻断亚胺培南的肾脏代谢。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了西司他丁对人类肾脏的保护作用。研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析观察性(比较效应)研究或随机临床试验(RCT)。研究的筛选标准我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验登记系统中从数据库开始到2023年11月的所有研究,以寻找对单用西司他丁或亚胺培南-西司他丁联合治疗组与未用西司他丁治疗的非活性或活性对照组的肾脏结果进行比较的观察性研究或RCT。结果我们确定了10项符合纳入标准的研究(5项RCT,n=531名患者;5项观察性研究,n=6321名参与者),其中包括4项与非活性对照组进行比较的研究和6项与替代抗生素进行比较的研究。根据 7 项研究的汇总结果,亚胺培南-西司他丁的 AKI 风险较低(风险比 [RR],0.52;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.40-0.67;I2 = 26.5%),在 RCT(3 项 RCT,RR,0.26;95% CI,0.09-0.77;I2 = 44.4%)和观察性研究(4 项研究,RR,0.54;95% CI,0.41-0.72;I2 = 44.4%)中观察到的结果一致。根据6项研究的结果,使用亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗后,血清肌酐浓度低于对照组(血清肌酐的加权平均差异为-0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.07;I2 = 0%)。结论与对照组或接受了对比抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的患者发生AKI的频率较低,治疗后血清肌酐浓度也较低。为确定西司他丁预防 AKI 的疗效,需要进行更大规模的临床试验,以降低因缺乏分配隐藏和盲法而导致的检测偏倚风险。本系统综述和荟萃分析确定了 10 项亚胺培南-西司他丁研究(5 项随机对照试验和 5 项观察性研究),涉及有 AKI 风险的人群。对治疗效果的汇总估计表明,与对比组相比,接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的患者的 AKI 发生率较低,治疗后血清肌酐浓度也较低。尽管这些研究结果很有希望,但由于研究之间存在异质性、高偏倚风险以及数据的间接性,证据的总体确定性较低。尽管西司他丁似乎是一种很有前景的预防 AKI 的药物,但还需要更大规模、设计合理的试验来确定其有效性。
{"title":"Nephroprotective Effects of Cilastatin in People at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Dilaram Acharya ,&nbsp;Fanar Ghanim ,&nbsp;Tyrone G. Harrison ,&nbsp;Tayler Dawn Scory ,&nbsp;Nusrat Shommu ,&nbsp;Paul E. Ronksley ,&nbsp;Meghan J. Elliott ,&nbsp;David Collister ,&nbsp;Neesh Pannu ,&nbsp;Matthew T. James","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Rationale &amp; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem’s renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Setting &amp; Study Populations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Selection Criteria for Studies&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Extraction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Analytical Approach&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; statistic.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;531&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;patients; 5 observational studies, n&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;26.5%), with consistent results observed in RCTs (3 RCTs, RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.77; &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;44.4%) and observational studies (4 studies, RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;44.4%). Based on results from 6 studies, serum creatinine concentration was lower following treatment with imipenem-cilastatin than comparators (weighted mean difference in serum creatinine&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;−0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.21 to&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;−0.07; &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;0%). The overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity of the results, high risk of bias, and indirectness among the identified studies.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received compar","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142654935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pegloticase-Induced Rapid Uric Acid Lowering and Kidney and Cardiac Health Markers in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Clinical Trial Pegloticase诱导的快速尿酸降低以及青年 2 型糖尿病患者的肾脏和心脏健康指标:试点临床试验
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100911
Phoom Narongkiatikhun MD , Sungho Park PhD , Amy Rydin MD , Callie Rountree-Jablin , Ye Ji Choi MPH , Jo Ann Antenor PhD, MPH , Laura Pyle PhD , Lynette Driscoll PA-C, MA , Daniel van Raalte MD , Maureen Pushea CCLS , Alyssa Caldwell-McGee MS , Vuddhidej Ophascharoensuk MD , Kristen Nadeau MD , Kalie Tommerdahl MD , Richard J. Johnson MD , Lorna Browne MD , Alex J. Barker MD , Petter Bjornstad MD
{"title":"Pegloticase-Induced Rapid Uric Acid Lowering and Kidney and Cardiac Health Markers in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Clinical Trial","authors":"Phoom Narongkiatikhun MD ,&nbsp;Sungho Park PhD ,&nbsp;Amy Rydin MD ,&nbsp;Callie Rountree-Jablin ,&nbsp;Ye Ji Choi MPH ,&nbsp;Jo Ann Antenor PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Laura Pyle PhD ,&nbsp;Lynette Driscoll PA-C, MA ,&nbsp;Daniel van Raalte MD ,&nbsp;Maureen Pushea CCLS ,&nbsp;Alyssa Caldwell-McGee MS ,&nbsp;Vuddhidej Ophascharoensuk MD ,&nbsp;Kristen Nadeau MD ,&nbsp;Kalie Tommerdahl MD ,&nbsp;Richard J. Johnson MD ,&nbsp;Lorna Browne MD ,&nbsp;Alex J. Barker MD ,&nbsp;Petter Bjornstad MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100911","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142594065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advanced CKD of Uncertain Etiology Among Children in Guatemala: Genetic and Clinical Characteristics 危地马拉儿童病因不明的晚期 CKD:遗传和临床特征
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100910
Ankana Daga MD , Ana Luz Morales MD , Shirlee Shril MD , Elizabeth Benoit MPH , Dalia Pantel MD , Angie Aguilar-González MD , Mario García MD , Ana C. Onuchic-Whitford MD , Randall Lou-Meda MD , Friedhelm Hildebrandt MD
{"title":"Advanced CKD of Uncertain Etiology Among Children in Guatemala: Genetic and Clinical Characteristics","authors":"Ankana Daga MD ,&nbsp;Ana Luz Morales MD ,&nbsp;Shirlee Shril MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Benoit MPH ,&nbsp;Dalia Pantel MD ,&nbsp;Angie Aguilar-González MD ,&nbsp;Mario García MD ,&nbsp;Ana C. Onuchic-Whitford MD ,&nbsp;Randall Lou-Meda MD ,&nbsp;Friedhelm Hildebrandt MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100910","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100910","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142586707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study CKD 3 期和 4 期患者的抗高血压治疗模式:CKD-REIN 队列研究
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100912
Margaux Costes-Albrespic , Sophie Liabeuf , Solène Laville , Christian Jacquelinet , Christian Combe , Denis Fouque , Maurice Laville , Luc Frimat , Roberto Pecoits-Filho , Oriane Lambert , Ziad A. Massy , Bénédicte Sautenet , Natalia Alencar de Pinho
<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>Blood pressure (BP) control is essential for preventing cardiorenal complications in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but most patients fail to reach BP target. We assessed longitudinal patterns of antihypertensive drug prescription and systolic BP.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Prospective observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Population</h3><div>In total, 2,755 hypertensive patients with CKD stages 3-4, receiving care from a nephrologist, from the French CKD–Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN cohort study).</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and laboratory data, and provider factors, including number of primary care physician and specialist encounters.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Changes in antihypertensive drug-class prescription during follow-up: add-on or withdrawal.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Hierarchical shared-frailty models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) to deal with clustering at the nephrologist level and linear mixed models to describe systolic BP trajectory.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline, median age was 69 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 33<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73 m². In total, 66% of patients were men, 81% had BP<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->130/80<!--> <!-->mm Hg, and 75% were prescribed<!--> <!-->≥2 antihypertensive drugs. During a median 5-year follow-up, the rate of changes of antihypertensive prescription was 50 per 100 person-years, 23 per 100 for add-ons, and 25 per 100 for withdrawals. After adjusting for risk factors, systolic BP, and the number of antihypertensive drugs, poor medication adherence was associated with increased HR for add-on (1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.80), whereas a lower education level was associated with increased HR for withdrawal (1.23, 95% CI, 1.02-1.49) for 9-11 years versus<!--> <!-->≥12 years. More frequent nephrologist visits (≥4 vs none) were associated with higher HRs of add-on and withdrawal (1.52, 95% CI, 1.06-2.18; 1.57, 95% CI, 1.12-2.19, respectively), whereas associations with visit frequency to other physicians varied with their specialty. Mean systolic BP decreased by 4<!--> <!-->mm Hg following drug add-on but tended to increase thereafter.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Lack of information on prescriber and drug dosing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with CKD and poor BP control, changes in antihypertensive drug prescriptions are common and relate to clinician preferences and patients’ tolerability. Sustainable reduction in systolic BP after add-on of a drug class is infrequently achieved.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Blood pressure (BP) control remains unattained in most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), raising questions about how antihypertensive treatment is manag
研究理由和目的控制血压对于预防慢性肾脏病(CKD)的心肾并发症至关重要,但大多数患者无法达到血压目标。我们对降压药处方和收缩压的纵向模式进行了评估。研究设计前瞻性观察性队列研究。暴露患者因素包括社会人口学特征、病史和实验室数据,医疗服务提供者因素包括初级保健医生和专科医生接诊次数。结果随访期间降压药类处方的变化:加服或停用。分析方法分层共享虚弱模型估算危险比(HR),以处理肾病医生层面的聚类问题,线性混合模型描述收缩压轨迹。结果基线时,中位年龄为 69 岁,平均肾小球滤过率为 33 mL/min/1.73 m²。66%的患者为男性,81%的患者血压≥130/80 mm Hg,75%的患者服用≥2种降压药。在中位 5 年的随访期间,降压药处方的变化率为每 100 人年 50 次,其中 23 次为加药,25 次为停药。在对危险因素、收缩压和降压药物数量进行调整后,用药依从性差与加药 HR 的增加有关(1.35,95% 置信区间 [CI],1.01-1.80),而教育水平较低与 9-11 年与≥12 年的停药 HR 的增加有关(1.23,95% CI,1.02-1.49)。肾科医生就诊次数越多(≥4 次与无次数),加药和停药的 HR 越高(分别为 1.52,95% CI,1.06-2.18;1.57,95% CI,1.12-2.19),而与其他医生就诊次数的关系则因专科而异。结论 在血压控制不佳的慢性肾脏病患者中,抗高血压药物处方的改变很常见,这与临床医生的偏好和患者的耐受性有关。白话摘要大多数慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者仍无法达到血压控制目标,这就提出了如何管理降压治疗的问题。我们的研究强调了在 5 年的随访中,接受肾科医生治疗的 CKD 3-4 期患者降压药处方的动态但异质性模式。高体重指数和用药依从性差等可改变因素与增加抗高血压药物种类的较高风险有关,与基线血压和抗高血压治疗无关。同样,较低的教育水平与停用降压药有关,更频繁地就诊于初级保健医生也与停用降压药有关,这凸显了协调护理的重要性。添加一类药物后收缩压持续降低的情况并不多见,这可能与停药和治疗依从性差有关。
{"title":"Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study","authors":"Margaux Costes-Albrespic ,&nbsp;Sophie Liabeuf ,&nbsp;Solène Laville ,&nbsp;Christian Jacquelinet ,&nbsp;Christian Combe ,&nbsp;Denis Fouque ,&nbsp;Maurice Laville ,&nbsp;Luc Frimat ,&nbsp;Roberto Pecoits-Filho ,&nbsp;Oriane Lambert ,&nbsp;Ziad A. Massy ,&nbsp;Bénédicte Sautenet ,&nbsp;Natalia Alencar de Pinho","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100912","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100912","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Rationale &amp; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Blood pressure (BP) control is essential for preventing cardiorenal complications in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but most patients fail to reach BP target. We assessed longitudinal patterns of antihypertensive drug prescription and systolic BP.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Prospective observational cohort study.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Setting &amp; Population&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In total, 2,755 hypertensive patients with CKD stages 3-4, receiving care from a nephrologist, from the French CKD–Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN cohort study).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Exposure&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and laboratory data, and provider factors, including number of primary care physician and specialist encounters.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Outcomes&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Changes in antihypertensive drug-class prescription during follow-up: add-on or withdrawal.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Analytical Approach&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Hierarchical shared-frailty models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) to deal with clustering at the nephrologist level and linear mixed models to describe systolic BP trajectory.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;At baseline, median age was 69 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 33&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;mL/min/1.73 m². In total, 66% of patients were men, 81% had BP&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;≥&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;130/80&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;mm Hg, and 75% were prescribed&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;≥2 antihypertensive drugs. During a median 5-year follow-up, the rate of changes of antihypertensive prescription was 50 per 100 person-years, 23 per 100 for add-ons, and 25 per 100 for withdrawals. After adjusting for risk factors, systolic BP, and the number of antihypertensive drugs, poor medication adherence was associated with increased HR for add-on (1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.80), whereas a lower education level was associated with increased HR for withdrawal (1.23, 95% CI, 1.02-1.49) for 9-11 years versus&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;≥12 years. More frequent nephrologist visits (≥4 vs none) were associated with higher HRs of add-on and withdrawal (1.52, 95% CI, 1.06-2.18; 1.57, 95% CI, 1.12-2.19, respectively), whereas associations with visit frequency to other physicians varied with their specialty. Mean systolic BP decreased by 4&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;mm Hg following drug add-on but tended to increase thereafter.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Lack of information on prescriber and drug dosing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In patients with CKD and poor BP control, changes in antihypertensive drug prescriptions are common and relate to clinician preferences and patients’ tolerability. Sustainable reduction in systolic BP after add-on of a drug class is infrequently achieved.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Plain-Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Blood pressure (BP) control remains unattained in most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), raising questions about how antihypertensive treatment is manag","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100912"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142586681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Remote Patient Monitoring: A Single Center’s Experience and an Effectiveness Evaluation 急性肾损伤幸存者远程患者监护:单个中心的经验与效果评估
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100905
Mariam Charkviani , Andrea G. Kattah , Andrew D. Rule , Jennifer A. Ferguson , Kristin C. Mara , Kianoush B. Kashani , Heather P. May , Jordan K. Rosedahl , Swetha Reddy , Lindsey M. Philpot , Erin F. Barreto

Rationale & Objective

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) could improve the quality and efficiency of acute kidney injury (AKI) survivor care. This study described our experience with AKI RPM and characterized its effectiveness.

Study Design

A cohort study matched 1:3 to historical controls.

Setting & Participants

Patients hospitalized with an episode of AKI who were discharged home and were not treated with dialysis.

Exposure

Participation in an AKI RPM program, which included use of a home vital sign and symptom monitoring technology and weekly in-center laboratory assessments.

Outcomes

Risk of unplanned hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit within 6 months.

Analytic Approach

Endpoints were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Forty of the 49 patients enrolled in AKI RPM (82%) participated in the program after hospital discharge. Seventy three percent of patients experienced one AKI RPM alert, most commonly related to fluid status. Among those with stage 3 AKI, the risk of unplanned readmission or ED visit within 6 months of discharge was not different between AKI RPM patients (n = 34) and matched controls (n = 102) (HR 1.33 [95% CI, 0.81-2.18]; P = 0.27). The incidence of an ED visit without hospitalization was significantly higher in the AKI RPM group (HR 1.95, [95% CI, 1.05-3.62]; P = 0.035). The risk of an unplanned readmission or ED visit was higher in those with baseline eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 exposed to AKI RPM (HR 2.24 [95% CI, 1.19-4.20]; P = 0.012) when compared with those with baseline eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.29-1.67]; P = 0.41) (test of interaction P = 0.04).

Limitations

Small sample size that may have been underpowered for the effectiveness endpoints.

Conclusions

AKI RPM, when used after hospital discharge, led to alerts and interventions directed at optimizing kidney health and AKI complications but did not reduce the risk for rehospitalization.
理论依据& 目标远程患者监护(RPM)可提高急性肾损伤(AKI)幸存者护理的质量和效率。本研究介绍了我们在 AKI RPM 方面的经验,并描述了其有效性。研究设计一项队列研究,与历史对照组进行 1:3 匹配。结果6个月内发生意外再入院或急诊科就诊的风险。分析方法采用Cox比例危险模型评估终点。结果49名参加AKI RPM的患者中有40人(82%)在出院后参加了该项目。73%的患者经历过一次 AKI RPM 警报,最常见的警报与液体状态有关。在 3 期 AKI 患者中,AKI RPM 患者(34 人)与匹配对照组(102 人)在出院后 6 个月内发生意外再入院或急诊就诊的风险没有差异(HR 1.33 [95% CI, 0.81-2.18];P = 0.27)。AKI RPM 组未住院的急诊就诊发生率明显更高(HR 1.95 [95% CI, 1.05-3.62];P = 0.035)。与基线 eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 的患者相比(HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.29-1.67]; P = 0.41),接受 AKI RPM 治疗的基线 eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 患者发生意外再入院或急诊就诊的风险更高(HR 2.24 [95% CI, 1.19-4.20]; P = 0.012)(交互作用检验 P = 0.04)。结论出院后使用AKI RPM可发出警报并采取干预措施,以优化肾脏健康和AKI并发症,但并不能降低再次住院的风险。
{"title":"Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Remote Patient Monitoring: A Single Center’s Experience and an Effectiveness Evaluation","authors":"Mariam Charkviani ,&nbsp;Andrea G. Kattah ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Rule ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Ferguson ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Mara ,&nbsp;Kianoush B. Kashani ,&nbsp;Heather P. May ,&nbsp;Jordan K. Rosedahl ,&nbsp;Swetha Reddy ,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Philpot ,&nbsp;Erin F. Barreto","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100905","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100905","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) could improve the quality and efficiency of acute kidney injury (AKI) survivor care. This study described our experience with AKI RPM and characterized its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A cohort study matched 1:3 to historical controls.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><div>Patients hospitalized with an episode of AKI who were discharged home and were not treated with dialysis.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Participation in an AKI RPM program, which included use of a home vital sign and symptom monitoring technology and weekly in-center laboratory assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Risk of unplanned hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit within 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Analytic Approach</h3><div>Endpoints were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty of the 49 patients enrolled in AKI RPM (82%) participated in the program after hospital discharge. Seventy three percent of patients experienced one AKI RPM alert, most commonly related to fluid status. Among those with stage 3 AKI, the risk of unplanned readmission or ED visit within 6 months of discharge was not different between AKI RPM patients (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->34) and matched controls (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->102) (HR 1.33 [95% CI, 0.81-2.18]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27). The incidence of an ED visit without hospitalization was significantly higher in the AKI RPM group (HR 1.95, [95% CI, 1.05-3.62]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.035). The risk of an unplanned readmission or ED visit was higher in those with baseline eGFR<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->45<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup> exposed to AKI RPM (HR 2.24 [95% CI, 1.19-4.20]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.012) when compared with those with baseline eGFR<!--> <!-->≥45<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup> (HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.29-1.67]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.41) (test of interaction <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Small sample size that may have been underpowered for the effectiveness endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AKI RPM, when used after hospital discharge, led to alerts and interventions directed at optimizing kidney health and AKI complications but did not reduce the risk for rehospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142418758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Red Yeast Rice (Beni-kōji) Supplement: A Report of Two Cases 与红麴(Beni-kōji)补充剂有关的急性肾损伤:两个病例的报告
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100908
Kiyotaka Uchiyama , Masako Otani , Naoki Chigusa , Kazuya Sugita , Ryosuke Matsuoka , Koji Hosoya , Mina Komuta , Jun Ito , Naoki Washida
Numerous health concerns, primarily kidney injury, have been reported with the use of Beni-kōji CholesteHelp, a functional food containing red yeast rice. Here, we describe 2 cases of kidney injury caused by beni-kōji. The first case had normal kidney function before consuming the product. After several months of use, she developed hypertension. After 6 months of supplement consumption, her estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) dropped to 22.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. A spot urine sample showed a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of 2.03 g/g, leading to the diagnosis of Fanconi syndrome. Kidney biopsy showed tubular degeneration. Thirty-five days after discontinuing the supplement, proteinuria resolved and the eGFR returned to baseline level. The second case, who had diabetes and normal kidney function, experienced severe kidney injury (eGFR, 3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) after 4 months of Beni-kōji CholesteHelp use. He required hemodialysis for >2 weeks but recovered kidney function after the product was discontinued. Kidney biopsy showed tubular injury similar to the first case and glomeruli changes consistent with diabetic nephropathy. These cases indicate that beni-kōji use is associated with tubular toxicity. Further studies are required to identify the precise etiology and mechanism of kidney injury.
使用含有红麴的功能性食品 Beni-kōji CholesteHelp 引起了许多健康问题,主要是肾损伤。在此,我们描述了两例由 Beni-kōji 引起的肾损伤。第一个病例在服用该产品前肾功能正常。服用几个月后,她患上了高血压。服用补充剂 6 个月后,她的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降至 22.5 mL/min/1.73 m2。点滴尿样显示尿蛋白与肌酐的比率为 2.03 g/g,因此被诊断为范科尼综合征。肾活检显示肾小管退化。停用补充剂 35 天后,蛋白尿消失,eGFR 恢复到基线水平。第二个病例患有糖尿病,肾功能正常,在服用贝尼可司胆石通 4 个月后,出现了严重的肾损伤(eGFR,3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2)。他需要进行 2 周的血液透析,但停药后肾功能恢复。肾活检显示肾小管损伤与第一个病例相似,肾小球变化与糖尿病肾病一致。这些病例表明,使用苯光吉与肾小管毒性有关。要确定肾损伤的确切病因和机制,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Red Yeast Rice (Beni-kōji) Supplement: A Report of Two Cases","authors":"Kiyotaka Uchiyama ,&nbsp;Masako Otani ,&nbsp;Naoki Chigusa ,&nbsp;Kazuya Sugita ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Matsuoka ,&nbsp;Koji Hosoya ,&nbsp;Mina Komuta ,&nbsp;Jun Ito ,&nbsp;Naoki Washida","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous health concerns, primarily kidney injury, have been reported with the use of Beni-kōji CholesteHelp, a functional food containing red yeast rice. Here, we describe 2 cases of kidney injury caused by beni-kōji. The first case had normal kidney function before consuming the product. After several months of use, she developed hypertension. After 6 months of supplement consumption, her estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) dropped to 22.5<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup>. A spot urine sample showed a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of 2.03<!--> <!-->g/g, leading to the diagnosis of Fanconi syndrome. Kidney biopsy showed tubular degeneration. Thirty-five days after discontinuing the supplement, proteinuria resolved and the eGFR returned to baseline level. The second case, who had diabetes and normal kidney function, experienced severe kidney injury (eGFR, 3.5<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup>) after 4 months of Beni-kōji CholesteHelp use. He required hemodialysis for<!--> <!-->&gt;2 weeks but recovered kidney function after the product was discontinued. Kidney biopsy showed tubular injury similar to the first case and glomeruli changes consistent with diabetic nephropathy. These cases indicate that beni-kōji use is associated with tubular toxicity. Further studies are required to identify the precise etiology and mechanism of kidney injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142528957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Renal Physiology Education via Podcast: Channel Your Enthusiasm 通过播客进行肾脏生理学教育:激发你的热情
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100903
Melanie P. Hoenig , Anna R. Gaddy , Priti Meena , Roger A. Rodby , Leticia Rolón , Juan Carlos Q. Velez , Joshua Waitzman , Amy A. Yau , Joel M. Topf
Renal physiology is considered one of the most challenging medical disciplines to understand and to teach. Eight academic nephrologists have come together to produce a podcast devoted to helping learners at any level improve their understanding of this difficult topic. Using Dr Burton D. Rose’s classic textbook: Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders, the podcast faculty systematically attack each chapter of the book in a didactic yet fun-flowing interactive discussion. This education model is unique and helps demystify complex topics.
肾脏生理学被认为是最难理解和教学的医学学科之一。八位肾脏病学专家共同制作了一个播客,致力于帮助任何水平的学习者提高对这一难题的理解。使用伯顿-D-罗斯博士的经典教科书:酸碱和电解质紊乱的临床生理学》,播客教师们通过说教式但又充满乐趣的互动讨论,系统地讲解了书中的每一章。这种教育模式是独一无二的,有助于解开复杂话题的神秘面纱。
{"title":"Renal Physiology Education via Podcast: Channel Your Enthusiasm","authors":"Melanie P. Hoenig ,&nbsp;Anna R. Gaddy ,&nbsp;Priti Meena ,&nbsp;Roger A. Rodby ,&nbsp;Leticia Rolón ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Q. Velez ,&nbsp;Joshua Waitzman ,&nbsp;Amy A. Yau ,&nbsp;Joel M. Topf","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100903","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100903","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renal physiology is considered one of the most challenging medical disciplines to understand and to teach. Eight academic nephrologists have come together to produce a podcast devoted to helping learners at any level improve their understanding of this difficult topic. Using Dr Burton D. Rose’s classic textbook: <em>Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders</em>, the podcast faculty systematically attack each chapter of the book in a didactic yet fun-flowing interactive discussion. This education model is unique and helps demystify complex topics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142416838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Back-up Arteriovenous Fistulas in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 腹膜透析患者的后备动静脉瘘:系统回顾和元分析
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100904
Hicham I. Cheikh Hassan , Pauline Byrne , Christie Harrod , Donia George , Karumathil Murali , Jenny H.C. Chen , Judy Mullan
<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a dialysis modality limited by the potential need of transferring to hemodialysis. Optimal hemodialysis vascular access is an arteriovenous fistula. Back-up arteriovenous fistula (bAVF) is a strategy to prevent central venous catheter (CVC) insertion, but its use in the PD population has not been systematically reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Study Populations</h3><div>Studies including PD patients with a bAVF and the associated outcomes, including risk of hemodialysis transfer with a CVC and the proportion of bAVFs used.</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Studies</h3><div>Retrospective or prospective, observational studies, non-randomized or randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extractions</h3><div>Vascular access at time of hemodialysis transfer (bAVF vs CVC) for patients with and without a bAVF. The data on bAVF outcomes included bAVFs that stopped working, were never used, and the number of patients requiring hemodialysis.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-proportional analysis were conducted, with risk of bias within studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We screened 1,855 studies, 11 of which met the inclusion criteria, comprising 598 (62%) patients with a bAVF and 368 (38%) without. The proportion of bAVFs never used was 69% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.58-0.80; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->86.2%). Meta-analysis of 8 studies found no difference in hemodialysis transfer between patients with a bAVF and those without (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86-1.51). However, the risk of hemodialysis transfer with a CVC was significantly lower in patients with a bAVF (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.17-0.68).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Substantial heterogeneity between the studies and large number of studies with poor quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>bAVF was associated with a high rate of non-utilization but a lower risk of starting hemodialysis via a CVC. Future studies assessing long-term clinical outcomes may provide further insights into the role of bAVF creation in shaping dialysis unit policies.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by hemodialysis transfer. The optimal vascular access in hemodialysis is the arteriovenous fistula, yet requirements for maturation often necessitate a central venous catheter (CVC) insertion in acute transfers from PD. A back-up arteriovenous fistula (bAVF) is a strategy used to avoid CVC use in such situations. However, no consensus is currently available on the best approach for bAVF in PD. By conducting a systematic review, we found that 69% of bAVFs were never used. Nevertheless, bAVFs reduced the risk of hemodialysis transfer with
原理&amp; 目的腹膜透析(PD)是一种透析方式,但由于可能需要转为血液透析而受到限制。最佳的血液透析血管通路是动静脉内瘘。研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析。研究地点和范围;研究人群研究包括使用动静脉内瘘的腹膜透析患者及其相关结果,包括使用CVC进行血液透析转移的风险和使用动静脉内瘘的比例。研究的选择标准回顾性或前瞻性、观察性研究、非随机或随机对照试验。数据提取有无bAVF患者血液透析转运时的血管通路(bAVF与CVC)。分析方法采用随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃比例分析,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究的偏倚风险。结果我们筛选了1855项研究,其中11项符合纳入标准,包括598名(62%)有bAVF的患者和368名(38%)无bAVF的患者。从未使用过 bAVF 的比例为 69%(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.58-0.80;I2 = 86.2%)。对 8 项研究进行的 Meta 分析发现,有 bAVF 和没有 bAVF 的患者在血液透析转运方面没有差异(危险比为 1.14;95% CI 为 0.86-1.51)。然而,bAVF患者使用CVC进行血液透析转移的风险明显较低(危险比为0.43;95% CI为0.17-0.68)。结论bAVF与较高的未使用率有关,但通过CVC开始血液透析的风险较低。未来对长期临床结果进行评估的研究可能会进一步揭示建立 bAVF 在制定透析室政策方面的作用.Plain-Language Summary腹膜透析(PD)受到血液透析转移的限制。血液透析的最佳血管通路是动静脉内瘘,但由于成熟度的要求,在急性腹膜透析转院时往往需要插入中心静脉导管(CVC)。备用动静脉内瘘 (bAVF) 是在这种情况下避免使用 CVC 的一种策略。然而,目前关于在腹膜透析患者中使用备用动静脉瘘的最佳方法尚未达成共识。通过系统回顾,我们发现 69% 的动静脉内瘘从未使用过。尽管如此,bAVF 仍将使用 CVC 进行血液透析的风险降低了近 60%。综述中的研究数量较少,异质性较高,因此需要进一步研究以明确 bAVF 在帕金森病患者中的作用和益处。
{"title":"Back-up Arteriovenous Fistulas in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Hicham I. Cheikh Hassan ,&nbsp;Pauline Byrne ,&nbsp;Christie Harrod ,&nbsp;Donia George ,&nbsp;Karumathil Murali ,&nbsp;Jenny H.C. Chen ,&nbsp;Judy Mullan","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100904","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100904","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Rationale &amp; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a dialysis modality limited by the potential need of transferring to hemodialysis. Optimal hemodialysis vascular access is an arteriovenous fistula. Back-up arteriovenous fistula (bAVF) is a strategy to prevent central venous catheter (CVC) insertion, but its use in the PD population has not been systematically reviewed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Systematic review and meta-analysis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Setting &amp; Study Populations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Studies including PD patients with a bAVF and the associated outcomes, including risk of hemodialysis transfer with a CVC and the proportion of bAVFs used.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Selection Criteria for Studies&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Retrospective or prospective, observational studies, non-randomized or randomized controlled trials.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Extractions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Vascular access at time of hemodialysis transfer (bAVF vs CVC) for patients with and without a bAVF. The data on bAVF outcomes included bAVFs that stopped working, were never used, and the number of patients requiring hemodialysis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Analytical Approach&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-proportional analysis were conducted, with risk of bias within studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We screened 1,855 studies, 11 of which met the inclusion criteria, comprising 598 (62%) patients with a bAVF and 368 (38%) without. The proportion of bAVFs never used was 69% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.58-0.80; &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;!--&gt;=&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;86.2%). Meta-analysis of 8 studies found no difference in hemodialysis transfer between patients with a bAVF and those without (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86-1.51). However, the risk of hemodialysis transfer with a CVC was significantly lower in patients with a bAVF (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.17-0.68).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Substantial heterogeneity between the studies and large number of studies with poor quality.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;bAVF was associated with a high rate of non-utilization but a lower risk of starting hemodialysis via a CVC. Future studies assessing long-term clinical outcomes may provide further insights into the role of bAVF creation in shaping dialysis unit policies.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Plain-Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by hemodialysis transfer. The optimal vascular access in hemodialysis is the arteriovenous fistula, yet requirements for maturation often necessitate a central venous catheter (CVC) insertion in acute transfers from PD. A back-up arteriovenous fistula (bAVF) is a strategy used to avoid CVC use in such situations. However, no consensus is currently available on the best approach for bAVF in PD. By conducting a systematic review, we found that 69% of bAVFs were never used. Nevertheless, bAVFs reduced the risk of hemodialysis transfer with ","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142528657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incident Albuminuria and Ethnicity Among Adults With Diabetes in an Integrated Health Care System in the United States 美国综合医疗系统中成人糖尿病患者的白蛋白尿发生率与种族问题
IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100907
Billy Zeng MD , Jeanne A. Darbinian MPH , Kenneth K. Chen MD , Hasmik Arzumanyan MD , Sijie Zheng MD, PhD , Joan C. Lo MD
{"title":"Incident Albuminuria and Ethnicity Among Adults With Diabetes in an Integrated Health Care System in the United States","authors":"Billy Zeng MD ,&nbsp;Jeanne A. Darbinian MPH ,&nbsp;Kenneth K. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Hasmik Arzumanyan MD ,&nbsp;Sijie Zheng MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joan C. Lo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100907","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100907","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142537385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Kidney Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1