Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes that play a crucial role in regulating immune responses by governing the activation of Caspase-1, the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the induction of inflammatory cell death, pyroptosis. The inflammasomes are pivotal in effective host defense against a range of pathogens. Yet, overt activation of inflammasome signaling can be detrimental. The most well-studied NLRP3 inflammasome has the ability to detect a variety of stimuli including pathogen-associated molecular patterns, environmental irritants, and endogenous stimuli released from dying cells. Additionally, NLRP3 acts as a key sensor of cellular homeostasis and can be activated by disturbances in diverse metabolic pathways. Consequently, NLRP3 is considered a key player linking metabolic dysregulation to numerous inflammatory disorders such as gout, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Recently, compelling studies have highlighted a connection between lipids and the regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Lipids are integral to cellular processes that serve not only in maintaining the structural integrity and subcellular compartmentalization, but also in contributing to physiological equilibrium. Certain lipid species are known to define NLRP3 subcellular localization, therefore directly influencing the site of inflammasome assembly and activation. For instance, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate plays a crucial role in NLRP3 localization to the trans Golgi network. Moreover, new evidence has demonstrated the roles of lipid biosynthesis and trafficking in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. This review summarizes and discusses these emerging and varied roles of lipid metabolism in inflammasome activation. A deeper understanding of lipid-inflammasome interactions may open new avenues for therapeutic interventions to prevent or treat chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.
{"title":"From fat to fire: The lipid–inflammasome connection","authors":"Paras K. Anand","doi":"10.1111/imr.13403","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13403","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes that play a crucial role in regulating immune responses by governing the activation of Caspase-1, the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the induction of inflammatory cell death, pyroptosis. The inflammasomes are pivotal in effective host defense against a range of pathogens. Yet, overt activation of inflammasome signaling can be detrimental. The most well-studied NLRP3 inflammasome has the ability to detect a variety of stimuli including pathogen-associated molecular patterns, environmental irritants, and endogenous stimuli released from dying cells. Additionally, NLRP3 acts as a key sensor of cellular homeostasis and can be activated by disturbances in diverse metabolic pathways. Consequently, NLRP3 is considered a key player linking metabolic dysregulation to numerous inflammatory disorders such as gout, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Recently, compelling studies have highlighted a connection between lipids and the regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Lipids are integral to cellular processes that serve not only in maintaining the structural integrity and subcellular compartmentalization, but also in contributing to physiological equilibrium. Certain lipid species are known to define NLRP3 subcellular localization, therefore directly influencing the site of inflammasome assembly and activation. For instance, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate plays a crucial role in NLRP3 localization to the <i>trans</i> Golgi network. Moreover, new evidence has demonstrated the roles of lipid biosynthesis and trafficking in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. This review summarizes and discusses these emerging and varied roles of lipid metabolism in inflammasome activation. A deeper understanding of lipid-inflammasome interactions may open new avenues for therapeutic interventions to prevent or treat chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"329 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antibodies provide an essential layer of protection from infection and reinfection with microbial pathogens. An impaired ability to produce antibodies results in immunodeficiency and necessitates the constant substitution with pooled serum antibodies from healthy donors. Among the five antibody isotypes in humans and mice, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies are the most potent anti-microbial antibody isotype due to their long half-life, their ability to penetrate almost all tissues and due to their ability to trigger a wide variety of effector functions. Of note, individuals suffering from IgG deficiency frequently produce self-reactive antibodies, suggesting that a normal serum IgG level also may contribute to maintaining self-tolerance. Indeed, the substitution of immunodeficient patients with pooled serum IgG fractions from healthy donors, also referred to as intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIg) therapy, not only protects the patient from infection but also diminishes autoantibody induced pathology, providing more direct evidence that IgG antibodies play an active role in maintaining tolerance during the steady state and during resolution of inflammation. The aim of this review is to discuss different conceptual models that may explain how serum IgG or IVIg can contribute to maintaining a balanced immune response. We will focus on pathways depending on the IgG fragment crystallizable (Fc) as pre-clinical data in various mouse model systems as well as human clinical data have demonstrated that the IgG Fc-domain recapitulates the ability of intact IVIg with respect to its ability to trigger resolution of inflammation. We will further discuss how the findings already have or are in the process of being translated to novel therapeutic approaches to substitute IVIg in treating autoimmune inflammation.
{"title":"Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of immunoglobulin G antibodies","authors":"Marjan Hematianlarki, Falk Nimmerjahn","doi":"10.1111/imr.13404","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13404","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antibodies provide an essential layer of protection from infection and reinfection with microbial pathogens. An impaired ability to produce antibodies results in immunodeficiency and necessitates the constant substitution with pooled serum antibodies from healthy donors. Among the five antibody isotypes in humans and mice, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies are the most potent anti-microbial antibody isotype due to their long half-life, their ability to penetrate almost all tissues and due to their ability to trigger a wide variety of effector functions. Of note, individuals suffering from IgG deficiency frequently produce self-reactive antibodies, suggesting that a normal serum IgG level also may contribute to maintaining self-tolerance. Indeed, the substitution of immunodeficient patients with pooled serum IgG fractions from healthy donors, also referred to as intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIg) therapy, not only protects the patient from infection but also diminishes autoantibody induced pathology, providing more direct evidence that IgG antibodies play an active role in maintaining tolerance during the steady state and during resolution of inflammation. The aim of this review is to discuss different conceptual models that may explain how serum IgG or IVIg can contribute to maintaining a balanced immune response. We will focus on pathways depending on the IgG fragment crystallizable (Fc) as pre-clinical data in various mouse model systems as well as human clinical data have demonstrated that the IgG Fc-domain recapitulates the ability of intact IVIg with respect to its ability to trigger resolution of inflammation. We will further discuss how the findings already have or are in the process of being translated to novel therapeutic approaches to substitute IVIg in treating autoimmune inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"328 1","pages":"372-386"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13404","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The critical importance of the immunoregulatory mechanisms, which prevent adverse responses to dietary proteins is demonstrated by the consequences of their failure in two common but distinct human pathological conditions, food allergy and celiac disease. The mechanisms of tolerance to dietary proteins have been extensively studied in mouse models but the extent to which the results in mice can be extrapolated to humans remains unclear. Here, after summarizing the mechanisms known to control oral tolerance in mouse models, we discuss how the monogenic immune disorders associated with food allergy on the one hand, and celiac disease, on the other hand, represent model diseases to gain insight into the key immunoregulatory pathways that control immune responses to food antigens in humans. The spectrum of monogenic disorders, in which the dysfunction of a single gene, is strongly associated with TH2-mediated food allergy suggests an important overlap between the mechanisms that regulate TH2 and IgE responses to food antigens in humans and mice. In contrast, celiac disease provides a unique example of the link between autoimmunity and loss of tolerance to a food antigen.
{"title":"Loss of tolerance to dietary proteins: From mouse models to human model diseases","authors":"Anais Levescot, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan","doi":"10.1111/imr.13395","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13395","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The critical importance of the immunoregulatory mechanisms, which prevent adverse responses to dietary proteins is demonstrated by the consequences of their failure in two common but distinct human pathological conditions, food allergy and celiac disease. The mechanisms of tolerance to dietary proteins have been extensively studied in mouse models but the extent to which the results in mice can be extrapolated to humans remains unclear. Here, after summarizing the mechanisms known to control oral tolerance in mouse models, we discuss how the monogenic immune disorders associated with food allergy on the one hand, and celiac disease, on the other hand, represent model diseases to gain insight into the key immunoregulatory pathways that control immune responses to food antigens in humans. The spectrum of monogenic disorders, in which the dysfunction of a single gene, is strongly associated with TH2-mediated food allergy suggests an important overlap between the mechanisms that regulate TH2 and IgE responses to food antigens in humans and mice. In contrast, celiac disease provides a unique example of the link between autoimmunity and loss of tolerance to a food antigen.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"326 1","pages":"173-190"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13395","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Monica Martinez-Blanco, Zhussipbek Mukhatayev, Talal A. Chatila
The early development of the neonatal immune system is profoundly influenced by exposure to dietary and microbial antigens, which shapes mucosal tolerance. Successful oral tolerance induction is crucially dependent on microbially imprinted immune cells, most notably the RORγt+ regulatory T (Treg) and antigen presenting cells and is essential for preventing food allergy (FA). The development of FA can be envisioned to result from disruptions at key checkpoints (CKPTs) that govern oral tolerance induction. These include gut epithelial sensory and effector circuits that when dysregulated promote pro-allergic gut dysbiosis. They also include microbially imprinted immune regulatory circuits that are disrupted by dysbiosis and pro-allergic immune responses unleashed by the dysregulation of the aforementioned cascades. Understanding these checkpoints is essential for developing therapeutic strategies to restore immune homeostasis in FA.
摘要新生儿免疫系统的早期发育受到暴露于饮食和微生物抗原的深刻影响,从而形成粘膜耐受。成功的口腔耐受性诱导主要依赖于微生物印记免疫细胞,特别是 RORγt+ 调节性 T 细胞(Treg)和抗原递呈细胞,这对于预防食物过敏(FA)至关重要。可以设想,食物过敏的发生是由于支配口腔耐受性诱导的关键检查点(CKPTs)受到破坏所致。这些检查点包括肠道上皮感觉和效应回路,当它们失调时,会促进肠道过敏性菌群失调。它们还包括微生物印记免疫调节回路,这些回路会因菌群失调和上述级联失调释放的促过敏免疫反应而受到破坏。了解这些检查点对于制定治疗策略以恢复 FA 的免疫平衡至关重要。
{"title":"Pathogenic mechanisms in the evolution of food allergy","authors":"Monica Martinez-Blanco, Zhussipbek Mukhatayev, Talal A. Chatila","doi":"10.1111/imr.13398","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13398","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The early development of the neonatal immune system is profoundly influenced by exposure to dietary and microbial antigens, which shapes mucosal tolerance. Successful oral tolerance induction is crucially dependent on microbially imprinted immune cells, most notably the RORγt<sup>+</sup> regulatory T (Treg) and antigen presenting cells and is essential for preventing food allergy (FA). The development of FA can be envisioned to result from disruptions at key checkpoints (CKPTs) that govern oral tolerance induction. These include gut epithelial sensory and effector circuits that when dysregulated promote pro-allergic gut dysbiosis. They also include microbially imprinted immune regulatory circuits that are disrupted by dysbiosis and pro-allergic immune responses unleashed by the dysregulation of the aforementioned cascades. Understanding these checkpoints is essential for developing therapeutic strategies to restore immune homeostasis in FA.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"326 1","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The enormous variety of antigens present in food is not ignored by the immune system. Dietary antigens are recognized as foreign, and tolerance must be induced. The regulation of both mucosal and systemic non-responsiveness to dietary antigens is therefore a basic physiological process which has drawn experimental interest for many years. Indeed, the first report on the induction of non-responsiveness by a fed antigen was published over one hundred years ago.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Since that time it has become clear that, in keeping with the need to maintain tolerance to dietary antigens, the oral route of antigen administration is uniquely suited to inducing antigen specific non-responsiveness. Experiments in the late 1980s highlighted the practical benefits of oral antigen administration by demonstrating that intragastric delivery of autoantigens, prior to peripheral immunization, protected against the development of autoimmunity in mice.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> This finding was subsequently confirmed in a large variety of animal models of autoimmune, allergic, and inflammatory disease, as well as in models of transplant rejection.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The generalizability of the observation that oral administration of antigen can protect against the development of antigen-induced systemic disease became the foundation for immunotherapeutic trials of orally administered antigens for several human diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes, autoimmune uveitis and food allergy.<span><sup>5</sup></span> However, unlike the murine models where the autoantigens were well defined and administered before disease was induced, the clinical trials attempted to modulate established tissue damage in settings in which the autoantigens were both complex and poorly characterized. It was not surprising, then, when these initial trials met with limited success. Both the murine and human studies succeeded, however, in stimulating interest in understanding the mechanisms by which orally administered antigens induce systemic nonresponsiveness to subsequent antigen challenge.</p><p>Early work by Weiner and colleagues described high and low dose oral tolerance mediated by deletion or anergy/suppression and a novel subset of TGF-β secreting “Th3” cells.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> The doses designated as high and low were somewhat arbitrarily defined. The identification of transcription factors that specify CD4 T cell differentiation did not reveal a Th3 subset, but did show that the production of TGF-β by innate immune cells is an important fate specifying cytokine for both Th17 cells and peripherally induced Foxp3<sup>+</sup> regulatory T cells (Tregs).<span><sup>8</sup></span> With the discovery of Foxp3<sup>+</sup> Tregs, attention switched to the role of food antigen specific Tregs induced in the context of the dietary vitamin A metabolite retinoic acid in gut draining lymph nodes. It was even suggested that oral t
{"title":"Immune responses to food","authors":"Cathryn R. Nagler","doi":"10.1111/imr.13397","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13397","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The enormous variety of antigens present in food is not ignored by the immune system. Dietary antigens are recognized as foreign, and tolerance must be induced. The regulation of both mucosal and systemic non-responsiveness to dietary antigens is therefore a basic physiological process which has drawn experimental interest for many years. Indeed, the first report on the induction of non-responsiveness by a fed antigen was published over one hundred years ago.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Since that time it has become clear that, in keeping with the need to maintain tolerance to dietary antigens, the oral route of antigen administration is uniquely suited to inducing antigen specific non-responsiveness. Experiments in the late 1980s highlighted the practical benefits of oral antigen administration by demonstrating that intragastric delivery of autoantigens, prior to peripheral immunization, protected against the development of autoimmunity in mice.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> This finding was subsequently confirmed in a large variety of animal models of autoimmune, allergic, and inflammatory disease, as well as in models of transplant rejection.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The generalizability of the observation that oral administration of antigen can protect against the development of antigen-induced systemic disease became the foundation for immunotherapeutic trials of orally administered antigens for several human diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes, autoimmune uveitis and food allergy.<span><sup>5</sup></span> However, unlike the murine models where the autoantigens were well defined and administered before disease was induced, the clinical trials attempted to modulate established tissue damage in settings in which the autoantigens were both complex and poorly characterized. It was not surprising, then, when these initial trials met with limited success. Both the murine and human studies succeeded, however, in stimulating interest in understanding the mechanisms by which orally administered antigens induce systemic nonresponsiveness to subsequent antigen challenge.</p><p>Early work by Weiner and colleagues described high and low dose oral tolerance mediated by deletion or anergy/suppression and a novel subset of TGF-β secreting “Th3” cells.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> The doses designated as high and low were somewhat arbitrarily defined. The identification of transcription factors that specify CD4 T cell differentiation did not reveal a Th3 subset, but did show that the production of TGF-β by innate immune cells is an important fate specifying cytokine for both Th17 cells and peripherally induced Foxp3<sup>+</sup> regulatory T cells (Tregs).<span><sup>8</sup></span> With the discovery of Foxp3<sup>+</sup> Tregs, attention switched to the role of food antigen specific Tregs induced in the context of the dietary vitamin A metabolite retinoic acid in gut draining lymph nodes. It was even suggested that oral t","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"326 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13397","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The prevalence of asthma, rhinitis, and food allergies has increased dramatically over the last few decades. This increase originally started in western countries, but is now also evident in many other regions of the world. Given the fact that the increase is so quick, the noted increase cannot be linked to a genetic effect, and many environmental factors have been identified that are associated with increased or reduced prevalence of allergies, like changing dietary habits, increased urbanization, pollution, exposure to microorganisms and LPS, and the farming environment and raw milk consumption. Although the key role of allergen-specific IgE in allergies is well known, the role of allergen-specific IgG and IgA antibodies is less well defined. This review will provide an overview of the functions of allergen-specific IgE in allergy, the role of allergen-specific antibodies (IgG (4) and IgA) in allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the possibility to use allergen-specific antibodies for treatment of ongoing allergies, and the potential role of allergen-specific antibodies in tolerance induction to allergens in a preventive setting. In the last, more speculative, section we will present novel hypotheses on the potential role of allergen-specific non-IgE antibodies in allergies by directing antigen presentation, Th2 development, and innate immune training.
{"title":"IgE versus IgG and IgA: Differential roles of allergen-specific antibodies in sensitization, tolerization, and treatment of allergies","authors":"E. F. Knol, R. J. J. van Neerven","doi":"10.1111/imr.13386","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13386","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevalence of asthma, rhinitis, and food allergies has increased dramatically over the last few decades. This increase originally started in western countries, but is now also evident in many other regions of the world. Given the fact that the increase is so quick, the noted increase cannot be linked to a genetic effect, and many environmental factors have been identified that are associated with increased or reduced prevalence of allergies, like changing dietary habits, increased urbanization, pollution, exposure to microorganisms and LPS, and the farming environment and raw milk consumption. Although the key role of allergen-specific IgE in allergies is well known, the role of allergen-specific IgG and IgA antibodies is less well defined. This review will provide an overview of the functions of allergen-specific IgE in allergy, the role of allergen-specific antibodies (IgG (4) and IgA) in allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the possibility to use allergen-specific antibodies for treatment of ongoing allergies, and the potential role of allergen-specific antibodies in tolerance induction to allergens in a preventive setting. In the last, more speculative, section we will present novel hypotheses on the potential role of allergen-specific non-IgE antibodies in allergies by directing antigen presentation, Th2 development, and innate immune training.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"328 1","pages":"314-333"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13386","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The increasing prevalence of immune-mediated non-communicable chronic diseases, such as food allergies, has prompted a deeper investigation into the role of the gut microbiome in modulating immune responses. Here, we explore the complex interactions between commensal microbes and the host immune system, highlighting the critical role of gut bacteria in maintaining immune homeostasis. We examine how modern lifestyle practices and environmental factors have disrupted co-evolved host–microbe interactions and discuss how changes in microbiome composition impact epithelial barrier function, responses to food allergens, and susceptibility to allergic diseases. Finally, we examine the potential of bioengineered microbiome-based therapies, and live biotherapeutic products, for reestablishing immune homeostasis to prevent or treat food allergies.
{"title":"Regulation of immune responses to food by commensal microbes","authors":"Samuel H. Light, Cathryn R. Nagler","doi":"10.1111/imr.13396","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13396","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing prevalence of immune-mediated non-communicable chronic diseases, such as food allergies, has prompted a deeper investigation into the role of the gut microbiome in modulating immune responses. Here, we explore the complex interactions between commensal microbes and the host immune system, highlighting the critical role of gut bacteria in maintaining immune homeostasis. We examine how modern lifestyle practices and environmental factors have disrupted co-evolved host–microbe interactions and discuss how changes in microbiome composition impact epithelial barrier function, responses to food allergens, and susceptibility to allergic diseases. Finally, we examine the potential of bioengineered microbiome-based therapies, and live biotherapeutic products, for reestablishing immune homeostasis to prevent or treat food allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"326 1","pages":"203-218"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13396","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since the approval of the CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab for the treatment of lymphoma in 1997, mAb therapy has significantly transformed cancer treatment. With over 90 FDA-approved mAbs for the treatment of various hematological and solid cancers, modern cancer treatment relies heavily on these therapies. The overwhelming success of mAbs as cancer therapeutics is attributed to their broad applicability, high safety profile, and precise targeting of cancer-associated surface antigens. Furthermore, mAbs can induce various anti-tumor cytotoxic effector mechanisms including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), all of which are mediated via their fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain. Over the past decades, these effector mechanisms have been substantially improved through Fc domain engineering. In this review, we will outline the different approaches to enhance Fc effector functions via Fc engineering of mAbs, with a specific emphasis on the so-called “HexaBody” technology, which is designed to enhance the hexamerization of mAbs on the target cell surface, thereby inducing greater complement activation, CDC, and receptor clustering. The review will summarize the development, preclinical, and clinical testing of several HexaBodies designed for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, as well as the potential use of the HexaBody technology beyond Fc-mediated effector functions.
摘要自 1997 年 CD20 靶向单克隆抗体(mAb)利妥昔单抗(rituximab)被批准用于治疗淋巴瘤以来,mAb疗法极大地改变了癌症治疗。美国食品及药物管理局批准了 90 多种 mAb 用于治疗各种血液肿瘤和实体肿瘤,现代癌症治疗在很大程度上依赖于这些疗法。mAbs 作为癌症疗法取得的巨大成功归功于其广泛的适用性、高安全性和对癌症相关表面抗原的精确靶向性。此外,mAbs 还能诱导各种抗肿瘤细胞毒性效应机制,包括抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)、抗体依赖性细胞吞噬(ADCP)和补体依赖性细胞毒性(CDC),所有这些机制都是通过其片段可结晶(Fc)结构域介导的。在过去的几十年中,这些效应机制通过 Fc 结构域工程得到了极大的改善。在这篇综述中,我们将概述通过 mAbs 的 Fc 工程增强 Fc 效应功能的不同方法,并特别强调所谓的 "HexaBody "技术,该技术旨在增强 mAbs 在靶细胞表面的六聚化,从而诱导更强的补体激活、CDC 和受体集群。综述将总结几种用于治疗 B 细胞恶性肿瘤的 HexaBodies 的开发、临床前和临床测试情况,以及 HexaBody 技术在 Fc 介导的效应器功能之外的潜在用途。
{"title":"Enhancing Fc-mediated effector functions of monoclonal antibodies: The example of HexaBodies","authors":"Hilma J. van der Horst, Tuna Mutis","doi":"10.1111/imr.13394","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13394","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the approval of the CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab for the treatment of lymphoma in 1997, mAb therapy has significantly transformed cancer treatment. With over 90 FDA-approved mAbs for the treatment of various hematological and solid cancers, modern cancer treatment relies heavily on these therapies. The overwhelming success of mAbs as cancer therapeutics is attributed to their broad applicability, high safety profile, and precise targeting of cancer-associated surface antigens. Furthermore, mAbs can induce various anti-tumor cytotoxic effector mechanisms including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), all of which are mediated via their fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain. Over the past decades, these effector mechanisms have been substantially improved through Fc domain engineering. In this review, we will outline the different approaches to enhance Fc effector functions via Fc engineering of mAbs, with a specific emphasis on the so-called “HexaBody” technology, which is designed to enhance the hexamerization of mAbs on the target cell surface, thereby inducing greater complement activation, CDC, and receptor clustering. The review will summarize the development, preclinical, and clinical testing of several HexaBodies designed for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, as well as the potential use of the HexaBody technology beyond Fc-mediated effector functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"328 1","pages":"456-465"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.13394","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hwa Yeong Lee, Tanuza Nazmul, Jinggang Lan, Michiko K. Oyoshi
The prevalence of allergies has been globally escalating. While allergies could appear at any age, they often develop in early life. However, the significant knowledge gap in the field is the mechanisms by which allergies affect certain people but not others. Investigating early factors and events in neonatal life that have a lasting impact on determining the susceptibilities of children to develop allergies is a significant area of the investigation as it promotes the understanding of neonatal immune system that mediates tolerance versus allergies. This review focuses on the research over the recent 10 years regarding the potential maternal factors that influence offspring allergies with a view to food allergy, a potentially life-threatening cause of anaphylaxis. The role of breast milk, maternal diet, maternal antibodies, and microbiota that have been suggested as key maternal factors regulating offspring allergies are discussed here. We also suggest future research area to expand our knowledge of maternal–offspring interactions on the pathogenesis of food allergy.
{"title":"Maternal influences on offspring food allergy","authors":"Hwa Yeong Lee, Tanuza Nazmul, Jinggang Lan, Michiko K. Oyoshi","doi":"10.1111/imr.13392","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13392","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The prevalence of allergies has been globally escalating. While allergies could appear at any age, they often develop in early life. However, the significant knowledge gap in the field is the mechanisms by which allergies affect certain people but not others. Investigating early factors and events in neonatal life that have a lasting impact on determining the susceptibilities of children to develop allergies is a significant area of the investigation as it promotes the understanding of neonatal immune system that mediates tolerance versus allergies. This review focuses on the research over the recent 10 years regarding the potential maternal factors that influence offspring allergies with a view to food allergy, a potentially life-threatening cause of anaphylaxis. The role of breast milk, maternal diet, maternal antibodies, and microbiota that have been suggested as key maternal factors regulating offspring allergies are discussed here. We also suggest future research area to expand our knowledge of maternal–offspring interactions on the pathogenesis of food allergy.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"326 1","pages":"130-150"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
At the end of the 19th century medicine was turned upside down by the development of serum therapy, a great therapeutic revolution as was vaccination a few years earlier. Many serums were developed, the most famous being the German doctor Emil von Behring's diphtheria serum, which saved countless children's lives from this dreadful disease. The discovery of the serum therapy principle, allowed by the progressive understanding of humoral immunity, occurred both in Germany and France, almost at the same time. Interestingly, this principle arose from two different intellectual paths, reviving the age-old opposition between mechanism and vitalism: while Behring came to this discovery reasoning as a chemist, French researchers Charles Richet and Jules Héricourt behaved as physiologists, focusing on the role of the host in the host-pathogen interaction. However, we should maybe consider that serum therapy history begins much earlier. Great forerunners must not be forgotten, especially researchers who investigated the field of immunity as soon as in the very beginning of the microbiological revolution; but also many people throughout centuries who tried to cure diseases with blood: as a transfer of blood serum, serum therapy also lies in the tradition of blood transfusion.
摘要 19 世纪末,血清疗法的发展使医学发生了翻天覆地的变化,就像几年前的疫苗接种一样,这是一场伟大的治疗革命。许多血清被研制出来,其中最著名的是德国医生埃米尔-冯-贝林(Emil von Behring)的白喉血清,它挽救了无数罹患这种可怕疾病的儿童的生命。由于对体液免疫的逐步了解,血清疗法原理的发现几乎同时发生在德国和法国。有趣的是,这一原理产生于两种不同的思想路径,使古老的机制论与生命论之间的对立重现:贝林是以化学家的身份进行推理而发现这一原理的,而法国研究人员夏尔-里歇(Charles Richet)和儒勒-埃里克(Jules Héricourt)则是以生理学者的身份进行研究,重点关注宿主在宿主-病原体相互作用中的作用。不过,我们或许应该考虑到,血清疗法的历史要更早一些。我们不能忘记伟大的先行者,尤其是早在微生物学革命之初就对免疫领域进行研究的研究人员,以及几个世纪以来试图用血液治疗疾病的许多人:作为血清的转移,血清疗法也继承了输血的传统。
{"title":"From the Gorgon's blood to Behring's Blutserumtherapie: A long path towards serum therapy","authors":"Yves-Marie Lahaie, Hervé Watier","doi":"10.1111/imr.13391","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.13391","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>At the end of the 19th century medicine was turned upside down by the development of serum therapy, a great therapeutic revolution as was vaccination a few years earlier. Many serums were developed, the most famous being the German doctor Emil von Behring's diphtheria serum, which saved countless children's lives from this dreadful disease. The discovery of the serum therapy principle, allowed by the progressive understanding of humoral immunity, occurred both in Germany and France, almost at the same time. Interestingly, this principle arose from two different intellectual paths, reviving the age-old opposition between mechanism and vitalism: while Behring came to this discovery reasoning as a chemist, French researchers Charles Richet and Jules Héricourt behaved as physiologists, focusing on the role of the host in the host-pathogen interaction. However, we should maybe consider that serum therapy history begins much earlier. Great forerunners must not be forgotten, especially researchers who investigated the field of immunity as soon as in the very beginning of the microbiological revolution; but also many people throughout centuries who tried to cure diseases with blood: as a transfer of blood serum, serum therapy also lies in the tradition of blood transfusion.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"328 1","pages":"13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}