Leukemia & Lymphoma最新文献

Venetoclax (VEN), a B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) selective inhibitor, is widely used for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with promising results. However, the anti-leukemic effect of VEN in relapsed/refractory (R/R)- AML requires improvement. In this study, we observed that combining homoharringtonine (HHT) with VEN plus azacitidine resulted in a significantly higher response and better survival than VA alone in patients with R/R-AML. Basic research indicates that HHT combined with VEN has a highly synergistic effect against both resistant AML cells and primary cells with/without mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) co-culture in vivo, inhibiting proliferation and colony-forming capacity of AML cells associated with concomitant cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, HHT sensitizes AML cells to VEN by downregulating the anti-apoptotic proteins MCL-1/BCL-xL, activating reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to mitochondrial membrane potential loss, and attenuating fatty acid (FA) uptake. These findings adding HHT to VEN-based regimens may enhance outcomes in R/R-AML patients.

The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (p = 0.10-p = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.

As the integration of novel agents in the frontline therapy has primarily impacted upfront therapy of advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), this review will outline current management of advanced stage cHL at first line and at progression and relapse, focusing on the biology, clinical features, and therapeutic approaches. Due to S1826, HD21, and ECHELON-1, the first-line treatment of advanced cHL has dramatically changed, with novel agents part of standard frontline therapy. BV-AVD, BrECADD, and Nivo-AVD are now standard first-line regimens for patients with stage III-IV cHL, with improved outcomes compared to historical data in cHL. The addition of BV and PD-1 inhibitors to relapsed/refractory (r/r) cHL chemotherapy regimens improved outcomes in this population. Now, there is a paradigm shift with PD-1 moving into frontline therapy, so new studies to evaluate the role of these novel agents in salvage will be required to determine the optimal salvage approach in r/r cHL.

Up to 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Ineligible patients have inferior outcomes, but less is known about the impact of commonly used organ-function-based inclusion criteria on drug efficacy estimates. Data on DLBCL patients treated with CHOP+/-rituximab were retrieved from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Trial inclusion criteria were extracted from four international DLBCL trials (REMoDL-B, GOYA, POLARIX, and HOVON-84). Differences in overall survival (OS) and 5-year restricted mean survival differences (5 y-RMSDs) between trial eligible and ineligible patients were computed. The effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was quantified by the 5 y-RMSD between CHOP and R-CHOP-treated patients and the impact of individual trial criteria on estimated effectiveness was quantified by Shapley-values. In total, 4,083 R-CHOP-treated and 890 CHOP-treated DLBCL patients were included. Across the trials, 18.6-29.3% of the included R-CHOP-treated patients were deemed ineligible for trial based on organ function and performance status alone. Ineligible patients had significantly worse survival, with adjusted absolute differences in 5-year OS of 9-15%. The impact of individual criteria on the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was small (Shapley-value range, -2.74-0.31). Using a smaller set of criteria derived from a data-driven approach, the number of eligible patients increased by 16-38% and the 5 y-RMSD increased by 0.7-3.1 months. In conclusion, OS among trial ineligible DLBCL patients is inferior as expected, but relaxing trial criteria would have increased the number of trial participants without making major changes in estimated efficacy for a hypothetical CHOP versus R-CHOP trial. This does not necessarily imply that trial findings based on selected patients are unreliable, as the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was only slightly affected by omitting selected inclusion criteria.

We investigated immune cytopenia in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with concurrent acquired aplastic anemia (AA), focusing on three clinical cases treated with plasma cell-directed therapy. All three patients achieved partial response in MM and one patient experienced complete resolution of AA. Two patients had partial improvement in transfusion requirement but continued to suffer from severe AA, leading to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with improvement of transfusion requirement in both patients. In vitro serum testing of these patients demonstrated platelet mitochondrial dysfunction and platelet apoptosis but did not show sera-specific inhibition of erythroid colony formation in progenitor cells. The levels of IL8 and IL15 were elevated in MM patients with AA, implicating their potential roles in this co-occurrence. Response to IST points to the possibility of myeloma-dysregulated immune system leading to autoreactive T-cell destruction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, offering insights for developing new treatment for cytopenia in MM.