Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.239-260
K. Bondar
In 2021, we performed a ground penetrating radar survey at the place of the Epiphany Cathedral of the Kyiv Confraternal Monastery, destroyed in 1936, in order to precisely locate its foundations. The collection and analysis of archival information from open sources was carried out, which became the basis for the interpretation of the results of geophysical measurements. Publications and written testimonies of archaeologists who personally saw the foundations of the Cathedral became especially valuable. The set of historical data covers the period from 1615, that is, from the beginning of the construction of the wooden Epiphany Church, the predecessor of the Cathedral, to the present day. Original documents, blueprints, stock sources, photographs, and cartographic materials of the 17th––19th centuries, as well as historical works of the 19th–21st centuries, were analyzed. The information about the construction, restoration after the fire, functioning, and destruction of the Cathedral, as well as about the construction on its site in the 20th century, archaeological research in the 20th–21st centuries was generalized. Ground penetrating radar survey revealed the best-preserved group of foundations of the western wall of the Cathedral, which are proposed for archaeological excavations.
{"title":"Ground Penetrating Radar Scanning and Historical Interpretation of the Location of Kyiv Confraternal Monastery’s Epiphany Cathedral","authors":"K. Bondar","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.239-260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.239-260","url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, we performed a ground penetrating radar survey at the place of the Epiphany Cathedral of the Kyiv Confraternal Monastery, destroyed in 1936, in order to precisely locate its foundations. The collection and analysis of archival information from open sources was carried out, which became the basis for the interpretation of the results of geophysical measurements. Publications and written testimonies of archaeologists who personally saw the foundations of the Cathedral became especially valuable. The set of historical data covers the period from 1615, that is, from the beginning of the construction of the wooden Epiphany Church, the predecessor of the Cathedral, to the present day. Original documents, blueprints, stock sources, photographs, and cartographic materials of the 17th––19th centuries, as well as historical works of the 19th–21st centuries, were analyzed. The information about the construction, restoration after the fire, functioning, and destruction of the Cathedral, as well as about the construction on its site in the 20th century, archaeological research in the 20th–21st centuries was generalized. Ground penetrating radar survey revealed the best-preserved group of foundations of the western wall of the Cathedral, which are proposed for archaeological excavations.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"40 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138996055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.166-238
Sergii Bagro
The distribution of social roles in the learning process has long been based on the student’s demonstration of respect for his or her teacher, who is in a patronizing position as a mentor. Over time, the social context changes, but past experiences certainly leave their mark on people’s memories. While the friendly relationship between Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and his teacher is well-known in historiography, we know much less about the teachers of his son, Yuriy. Therefore, it is obvious that there is a need to close this gap.The historiography is dominated by the stereotype that Yuriy Khmelnytskyi studied at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. However, an analysis of source evidence shows that there is no particular reason to assert this possibility. Such assumptions appeared in Polish historical and literary texts to reflect the character’s specific traits. Then they migrated to the so-called «Cossack chronicles», and through them passed into scientific historical narratives.Among Yuriy Khmelnytskyi’s teachers, researchers usually mention Ioanikii Galiatowskyi and Hilarion Dobrodiashko. Moreover, since the nineteenth century, there is evidence of Havrylo Oleshkovych, who also taught the hetman’s son. All of them were monks, but they had different career paths. A review of the biographies of each of them allows us not only to make a judgment about their teaching in the hetman’s house but also to see whether they later crossed paths with their former student.Galiatowskyi and Oleshkovych were under the protection of Lazar Baranovych. They were both later used as agents of influence in dealing with Yuriy Khmelnytskyi. In 1676, the former was asked by Hetman Ivan Samoilovych to appeal to his former student to give up his political ambitions. In 1661, Bishop Methodius engaged the latter in negotiations with Yuriy in order to persuade the hetman to return to the rule of the Moscow tsar. Dobrodiyashko, on the other hand, was a monk of the Pechersk Monastery. Therefore, he was most likely influenced by Innokentiy Gizel. However, he later left his monastery and found refuge in St. Sophia Monastery under the protection of Bishop Methodius. In this situation, he spoke extremely negatively about his former student for refusing to obey the Moscow tsar and praised the deeds of his new benefactor. By that time, however, Khmelnytskyi had already relinquished his hetman’s powers.
{"title":"Teachers of Yuriy Khmelnytskyi","authors":"Sergii Bagro","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.166-238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.166-238","url":null,"abstract":"The distribution of social roles in the learning process has long been based on the student’s demonstration of respect for his or her teacher, who is in a patronizing position as a mentor. Over time, the social context changes, but past experiences certainly leave their mark on people’s memories. While the friendly relationship between Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and his teacher is well-known in historiography, we know much less about the teachers of his son, Yuriy. Therefore, it is obvious that there is a need to close this gap.The historiography is dominated by the stereotype that Yuriy Khmelnytskyi studied at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. However, an analysis of source evidence shows that there is no particular reason to assert this possibility. Such assumptions appeared in Polish historical and literary texts to reflect the character’s specific traits. Then they migrated to the so-called «Cossack chronicles», and through them passed into scientific historical narratives.Among Yuriy Khmelnytskyi’s teachers, researchers usually mention Ioanikii Galiatowskyi and Hilarion Dobrodiashko. Moreover, since the nineteenth century, there is evidence of Havrylo Oleshkovych, who also taught the hetman’s son. All of them were monks, but they had different career paths. A review of the biographies of each of them allows us not only to make a judgment about their teaching in the hetman’s house but also to see whether they later crossed paths with their former student.Galiatowskyi and Oleshkovych were under the protection of Lazar Baranovych. They were both later used as agents of influence in dealing with Yuriy Khmelnytskyi. In 1676, the former was asked by Hetman Ivan Samoilovych to appeal to his former student to give up his political ambitions. In 1661, Bishop Methodius engaged the latter in negotiations with Yuriy in order to persuade the hetman to return to the rule of the Moscow tsar. Dobrodiyashko, on the other hand, was a monk of the Pechersk Monastery. Therefore, he was most likely influenced by Innokentiy Gizel. However, he later left his monastery and found refuge in St. Sophia Monastery under the protection of Bishop Methodius. In this situation, he spoke extremely negatively about his former student for refusing to obey the Moscow tsar and praised the deeds of his new benefactor. By that time, however, Khmelnytskyi had already relinquished his hetman’s powers.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138998093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.137-165
Valerii Zema
The study of «The Book in Six Chapters» in the context of texts and phenomena of the Renaissance, Reformation, and Counter-Reformation shows that it was dependent on the atmosphere of changes that prevailed at the time. The Jesuit authors’ historical excursions into the Church’s past and the course of the councils seem to have a broader connotation. The appeal to the grievances and the influence of the Roman pontiffs during the councils testified to the growing importance of public debate and the revival of political life. At the same time, the importance of documents and legal practices, which were also evident in the testimonies of past events, increased. Vasyl Surazhsky tried to respond to such challenges by looking for counter-arguments and sources to counter his Catholic and Protestant opponents. The most significant was his creation of the concept of Jerusalem as the centre of Christendom, the source of faith, and faith. Jerusalem was designated as the symbolic centre of Christianity in the face of the decline of Constantinople. Surazhsky developed the criticisms of the Latins, accusing them of Jewish influences. The influence of the Reformation on the religious controversy by Surazhsky is also researched. The use of iconographic materials to study the treatises of Ukrainian authors, which reflects the peculiarities of the Orthodox doctrine, seems fruitful.
{"title":"Religious Controversy in Vasyl Surazhsky’s «Book in Six Chapters»: New Motives and Old Prejudices","authors":"Valerii Zema","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.137-165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.137-165","url":null,"abstract":"The study of «The Book in Six Chapters» in the context of texts and phenomena of the Renaissance, Reformation, and Counter-Reformation shows that it was dependent on the atmosphere of changes that prevailed at the time. The Jesuit authors’ historical excursions into the Church’s past and the course of the councils seem to have a broader connotation. The appeal to the grievances and the influence of the Roman pontiffs during the councils testified to the growing importance of public debate and the revival of political life. At the same time, the importance of documents and legal practices, which were also evident in the testimonies of past events, increased. Vasyl Surazhsky tried to respond to such challenges by looking for counter-arguments and sources to counter his Catholic and Protestant opponents. The most significant was his creation of the concept of Jerusalem as the centre of Christendom, the source of faith, and faith. Jerusalem was designated as the symbolic centre of Christianity in the face of the decline of Constantinople. Surazhsky developed the criticisms of the Latins, accusing them of Jewish influences. The influence of the Reformation on the religious controversy by Surazhsky is also researched. The use of iconographic materials to study the treatises of Ukrainian authors, which reflects the peculiarities of the Orthodox doctrine, seems fruitful.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138996693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.105-136
Nataliia Bondar
The publication attempts to analyse the engravings of the prominent Ukrainian master Hryhorii Levytskyi and his contacts with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. The article presents biographical information about the master, including his probable education at the Academy.A group of so-called engraved theses dedicated to Kyivan leaders is analysed. Attention is paid to the analysis of a previously unknown engraving depicting the Virgin Mary and Divine Infant. The frame of this engraving was used in the decoration of the title page of Mytrofan Dovhalevskyi’s manuscript lectures on poetics of 1736.The reattribution of the frame prompted a more thorough review of other examples of engraved copperplate frames in Levytskyi’s creative heritage, including the so-called «frame for theatre posters» of 1735 and the engraving used for the title of «The Journey to Jerusalem» 1751 by Serapion Kadianov-Mnozhynskyi. Both of these frames are not separate works but were made to illustrate panegyric texts of the academic circles, which were either not printed or not discovered and require further research. Similarly, the unsigned engraving, depicting the Epiphany, on the back of the title of «The Journey to Jerusalem» is probably made by Levytskyi and was intended to illustrate a text related to the Academy. The correct spelling of the surname of the author of «The Journey to Jerusalem», Serapion Kadian (or Kadianov)-Mnozhynskyi, was established. Also, by analogy, a version of the toponymic origin of the engraver Hryhorii Levytskyi’s surname was proposed.The study of the engravings in the context of the history of their use traces Hryhorii Levytskyi’s contacts with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, its teachers and students, including Hilarion Negrebetskyi, Mytrofan Dovhalevskyi, Mykhailo Kozachynskyi, Sylvester Kuliabka, Damian Halakhovskyi, Ambrose Negrebetskyi, Serapion Mnohynynskyi Kadyanov, Yosyp Narodovskyi, and others. It is also recorded that the cultural environment of the time, which functioned around the Academy and to which H. Levytskyi belonged, was united thanks to the efforts of its patron and developer, Kyiv Metropolitan Raphael Zaborovsky.
{"title":"Engravings by Hryhorii Levytskyi, associated with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy","authors":"Nataliia Bondar","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.105-136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.105-136","url":null,"abstract":"The publication attempts to analyse the engravings of the prominent Ukrainian master Hryhorii Levytskyi and his contacts with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. The article presents biographical information about the master, including his probable education at the Academy.A group of so-called engraved theses dedicated to Kyivan leaders is analysed. Attention is paid to the analysis of a previously unknown engraving depicting the Virgin Mary and Divine Infant. The frame of this engraving was used in the decoration of the title page of Mytrofan Dovhalevskyi’s manuscript lectures on poetics of 1736.The reattribution of the frame prompted a more thorough review of other examples of engraved copperplate frames in Levytskyi’s creative heritage, including the so-called «frame for theatre posters» of 1735 and the engraving used for the title of «The Journey to Jerusalem» 1751 by Serapion Kadianov-Mnozhynskyi. Both of these frames are not separate works but were made to illustrate panegyric texts of the academic circles, which were either not printed or not discovered and require further research. Similarly, the unsigned engraving, depicting the Epiphany, on the back of the title of «The Journey to Jerusalem» is probably made by Levytskyi and was intended to illustrate a text related to the Academy. The correct spelling of the surname of the author of «The Journey to Jerusalem», Serapion Kadian (or Kadianov)-Mnozhynskyi, was established. Also, by analogy, a version of the toponymic origin of the engraver Hryhorii Levytskyi’s surname was proposed.The study of the engravings in the context of the history of their use traces Hryhorii Levytskyi’s contacts with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, its teachers and students, including Hilarion Negrebetskyi, Mytrofan Dovhalevskyi, Mykhailo Kozachynskyi, Sylvester Kuliabka, Damian Halakhovskyi, Ambrose Negrebetskyi, Serapion Mnohynynskyi Kadyanov, Yosyp Narodovskyi, and others. It is also recorded that the cultural environment of the time, which functioned around the Academy and to which H. Levytskyi belonged, was united thanks to the efforts of its patron and developer, Kyiv Metropolitan Raphael Zaborovsky.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138996631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.263-274
Leonid Tymoshenko
Book review: Leonid Tymoshenko. Bilous, Nataliia. Za krok do vichnosti. Meshkantsi mist Volyni u svitli testamentiv kintsia XVI–XVII stolit (Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Prostir», 2021), 536 s.: il.
书评：列昂尼德-季莫申科。Bilous, Nataliia.Za krok do vichnosti.Meshkantsi mist Volyni u svitli testamentiv kintsia XVI-XVII stolit (Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim "Prostir", 2021), 536 p.: il.
{"title":"Bilous, Nataliia. Za krok do vichnosti. Meshkantsi mist Volyni u svitli testamentiv kintsia XVI–XVII stolit (Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Prostir», 2021), 536 s.: il.","authors":"Leonid Tymoshenko","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.263-274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.263-274","url":null,"abstract":"Book review: Leonid Tymoshenko. Bilous, Nataliia. Za krok do vichnosti. Meshkantsi mist Volyni u svitli testamentiv kintsia XVI–XVII stolit (Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Prostir», 2021), 536 s.: il.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"68 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138998076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.275-278
Iannis Carras
Book review: Iannis Carras. Ivanov, Andrey V. A Spiritual Revolution. The Impact of Reformation and Enlightenment in Orthodox Russia (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2020), xv, 363 pp.
书评Iannis Carras.Ivanov, Andrey V. A Spiritual Revolution.俄罗斯东正教改革和启蒙运动的影响》（麦迪逊：威斯康星大学出版社，2020 年），xv, 363 页。
{"title":"Ivanov, Andrey V. A Spiritual Revolution. The Impact of Reformation and Enlightenment in Orthodox Russia (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2020), xv, 363 pp.","authors":"Iannis Carras","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.275-278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2023.20.275-278","url":null,"abstract":"Book review: Iannis Carras. Ivanov, Andrey V. A Spiritual Revolution. The Impact of Reformation and Enlightenment in Orthodox Russia (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2020), xv, 363 pp.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"26 103","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138998997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-29DOI: 10.3790/978-3-428-55520-8
Ivan Almes
Review: Die Militarisierung der Heiligen in Vormoderne und Moderne, herausgegeben von Liliya Berezhnaya (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2020), 331 s. (Historische Forschungen, Band 122)
评论:《历史研究:122卷》
{"title":"Die Militarisierung der Heiligen in Vormoderne und Moderne","authors":"Ivan Almes","doi":"10.3790/978-3-428-55520-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-55520-8","url":null,"abstract":"Review: Die Militarisierung der Heiligen in Vormoderne und Moderne, herausgegeben von Liliya Berezhnaya (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2020), 331 s. (Historische Forschungen, Band 122)","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114354395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-29DOI: 10.18523/1995-025x.2022.19.37-77
S. Potapenko
The article focuses on a little-known literary work about Peter I which was composed by a Ukrainian poet, philosopher, and professor of the Kyivan Academy, Mykhailo Kozachynsky (1699–1755). This poetic biography was entitled «Journal or Description of the Years and the Glorious as well as Solemn Victories of the Blessed and Everlasting Memory Peter the Great, Pater Patriae, the First All-Russian Emperor». It was appended to a trilingual panegyric «Augustissimae ac Invictissimae Imperatrici» of the same authorship written in honor of the Empress Elizabeth’s of Russia visit to Kyiv in August-September 1744. The panegyric, the «Journal», a shortened edition of a dramatic play along with a poem and a canto formed a complex of works, which were published in the Kyiv-Pechersk printing house. One more of Kozachynsky’s related poem appeared in Wroclaw on the same occasion.The textual analysis of the «Journal» demonstrates that the author dealt with Feofan Prokopovych’s eulogies that glorified Peter I and were released in Kyiv and Saint-Petersburg throughout 1709–1725, namely «Panegyricvs de celeberrima et paene inavdita victoria qvam Pertvs Primva», «The Word to praise the Poltava Battle», «The Word on the Burial of the Most Illustrious Sovereign Peter the Great» and «The Word to Praise the Blessed and Everlasting Memory Peter the Great». In addition, Kozachynsky borrowed facts about the Great Northern War mostly from the so-called «The Mars’s Book» and then poetically reworked them. Such a richly illustrated collection of reports on the course of military affairs was published for the first time shortly after 1713 and later underwent several reprints.Taken in general, the context in which the «Journal» and the corresponding series of Mykhailo Kozachynsky’s works appeared reveals clearly that the Ukrainian elite of that time pursued the only goal to utilize Elizabeth’s arrival to Ukraine as an opportunity to lobby for the urgent issue of the restoration of the hetmanship. The splendor of the meeting with the special glorification of the Empress’s father served therefore as a propaganda tool to achieve this goal.
这篇文章关注的是一部鲜为人知的关于彼得一世的文学作品，它是由乌克兰诗人、哲学家、基辅学院教授米哈伊洛·科扎金斯基(Mykhailo Kozachynsky, 1699-1755)创作的。这本诗性传记的标题是《彼得大帝的光荣和庄严胜利的日记或描述》，他是第一位全俄皇帝，光荣和庄严的永恒记忆。它是附在同一作者为纪念1744年8月至9月俄罗斯伊丽莎白皇后访问基辅而写的三语赞美诗《奥古斯帝西梅和永不征服的帝国》之后的。赞美诗《日记》是一出戏剧的缩短版，加上一首诗和一首诗，构成了一套复杂的作品，在基辅-佩切尔斯克印刷厂出版。在同一场合，科扎金斯基的另一首相关诗也出现在弗罗茨瓦夫。对《日记》的文本分析表明，作者处理了费奥凡·普罗科波维奇在1709年至1725年期间在基辅和圣彼得堡发表的赞美彼得一世的悼词，即《Panegyricvs de celeberrima et paene inavdita victoria qvam Pertvs Primva》，《赞扬波尔塔瓦战役的词》，《关于最杰出的君主彼得大帝的葬礼的词》和《赞美祝福和永恒记忆的彼得大帝的词》。此外，科扎金斯基主要从所谓的《马尔斯之书》中借用了关于大北方战争的事实，然后诗意地重新创作了它们。1713年后不久，这样一本插图丰富的军事报告集首次出版，后来又进行了几次重印。总的来说，《华尔街日报》和相应的米哈伊洛·科扎金斯基系列作品出现的背景清楚地表明，当时的乌克兰精英们追求的唯一目标是利用伊丽莎白抵达乌克兰作为一个机会，为恢复酋长制度的紧迫问题进行游说。因此，与皇后父亲的特殊荣耀会面的辉煌成为实现这一目标的宣传工具。
{"title":"Between Biography and Propaganda: Mykhailo Kozachynsky’s «Journal or Description of the Years and the Glorious as well as Solemn Victories of the Blessed and Everlasting Memory Peter the Great, Pater Patriae, the First All-Russian Emperor» (1744)","authors":"S. Potapenko","doi":"10.18523/1995-025x.2022.19.37-77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/1995-025x.2022.19.37-77","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on a little-known literary work about Peter I which was composed by a Ukrainian poet, philosopher, and professor of the Kyivan Academy, Mykhailo Kozachynsky (1699–1755). This poetic biography was entitled «Journal or Description of the Years and the Glorious as well as Solemn Victories of the Blessed and Everlasting Memory Peter the Great, Pater Patriae, the First All-Russian Emperor». It was appended to a trilingual panegyric «Augustissimae ac Invictissimae Imperatrici» of the same authorship written in honor of the Empress Elizabeth’s of Russia visit to Kyiv in August-September 1744. The panegyric, the «Journal», a shortened edition of a dramatic play along with a poem and a canto formed a complex of works, which were published in the Kyiv-Pechersk printing house. One more of Kozachynsky’s related poem appeared in Wroclaw on the same occasion.The textual analysis of the «Journal» demonstrates that the author dealt with Feofan Prokopovych’s eulogies that glorified Peter I and were released in Kyiv and Saint-Petersburg throughout 1709–1725, namely «Panegyricvs de celeberrima et paene inavdita victoria qvam Pertvs Primva», «The Word to praise the Poltava Battle», «The Word on the Burial of the Most Illustrious Sovereign Peter the Great» and «The Word to Praise the Blessed and Everlasting Memory Peter the Great». In addition, Kozachynsky borrowed facts about the Great Northern War mostly from the so-called «The Mars’s Book» and then poetically reworked them. Such a richly illustrated collection of reports on the course of military affairs was published for the first time shortly after 1713 and later underwent several reprints.Taken in general, the context in which the «Journal» and the corresponding series of Mykhailo Kozachynsky’s works appeared reveals clearly that the Ukrainian elite of that time pursued the only goal to utilize Elizabeth’s arrival to Ukraine as an opportunity to lobby for the urgent issue of the restoration of the hetmanship. The splendor of the meeting with the special glorification of the Empress’s father served therefore as a propaganda tool to achieve this goal.","PeriodicalId":180564,"journal":{"name":"Kyivan Academy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114181535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：