Alex McDowell, Vicki Fung, David W Bates, Dinah Foer
Purpose: Our purpose was to understand the completeness of sex and gender fields in electronic health record (EHR) data and patient-level factors associated with completeness of those fields. In doing so, we aimed to inform approaches to EHR sex and gender data collection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using 2016-2021 deidentified EHR data from a large health care system. Our sample included adults who had an encounter at any of three hospitals within the health care system or were enrolled in the health care system's Accountable Care Organization. The sex and gender fields of interest were gender identity, sex assigned at birth (SAB), and legal sex. Patient characteristics included demographics, clinical features, and health care utilization. Results: In the final study sample (N = 3,473,123), gender identity, SAB, and legal sex (required for system registration) were missing for 75.4%, 75.8%, and 0.1% of individuals, respectively. Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with having complete gender identity and SAB. Notably, the odds of having complete gender identity and SAB were greater among individuals with an activated patient portal (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.66-2.70) and with more outpatient visits (OR = 4.34; 95% CI = 4.29-4.38 for 5+ visits); odds of completeness were lower among those with any urgent care visits (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.78-0.82). Conclusions: Missingness of sex and gender data in the EHR was high and associated with a range of patient factors. Key features associated with completeness highlight multiple opportunities for intervention with a focus on patient portal use, primary care provider reporting, and urgent care settings.
目的:我们的目的是了解电子健康记录(EHR)数据中性别字段的完整性以及与这些字段完整性相关的患者层面因素。这样做的目的是为电子病历性别和社会性别数据收集方法提供参考。研究方法这是一项回顾性观察研究,使用的是来自一个大型医疗保健系统的 2016-2021 年去标识化电子病历数据。我们的样本包括在医疗保健系统内三家医院中任何一家医院就诊或加入医疗保健系统责任医疗组织的成年人。我们关注的性别领域包括性别认同、出生时的性别分配(SAB)和法定性别。患者特征包括人口统计学、临床特征和医疗保健使用情况。研究结果在最终的研究样本(N = 3,473,123)中,分别有 75.4%、75.8% 和 0.1%的人缺少性别认同、SAB 和法定性别(系统注册所需)。一些人口统计学和临床因素与完整的性别认同和 SAB 相关。值得注意的是,在拥有激活的患者门户网站(几率比 [OR] = 2.68;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 2.66-2.70)和门诊就诊次数较多(OR = 4.34;95% CI = 4.29-4.38,5 次以上)的患者中,拥有完整性别认同和 SAB 的几率更大;在拥有任何紧急护理就诊次数的患者中,拥有完整性别认同和 SAB 的几率较低(OR = 0.80;95% CI = 0.78-0.82)。结论电子病历中性别数据的遗漏率很高,且与一系列患者因素有关。与完整性相关的主要特征突显了干预的多种机会,重点是患者门户网站的使用、初级保健提供者的报告和紧急护理环境。
{"title":"Factors Associated with Completeness of Sex and Gender Fields in Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Alex McDowell, Vicki Fung, David W Bates, Dinah Foer","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0359","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Our purpose was to understand the completeness of sex and gender fields in electronic health record (EHR) data and patient-level factors associated with completeness of those fields. In doing so, we aimed to inform approaches to EHR sex and gender data collection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective observational study using 2016-2021 deidentified EHR data from a large health care system. Our sample included adults who had an encounter at any of three hospitals within the health care system or were enrolled in the health care system's Accountable Care Organization. The sex and gender fields of interest were gender identity, sex assigned at birth (SAB), and legal sex. Patient characteristics included demographics, clinical features, and health care utilization. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the final study sample (<i>N</i> = 3,473,123), gender identity, SAB, and legal sex (required for system registration) were missing for 75.4%, 75.8%, and 0.1% of individuals, respectively. Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with having complete gender identity and SAB. Notably, the odds of having complete gender identity and SAB were greater among individuals with an activated patient portal (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.66-2.70) and with more outpatient visits (OR = 4.34; 95% CI = 4.29-4.38 for 5+ visits); odds of completeness were lower among those with any urgent care visits (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.78-0.82). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Missingness of sex and gender data in the EHR was high and associated with a range of patient factors. Key features associated with completeness highlight multiple opportunities for intervention with a focus on patient portal use, primary care provider reporting, and urgent care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141988311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study aimed to uncover sexual identity development and investigate the psychiatric risks for bisexual people across mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan by examining ecologically informed factors at the individual, family, and community levels. Methods: An internet-based survey was administered to 685 respondents, from June to August 2021, reached primarily through lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community organizations and professional networks. Participants reported their demographics, identity milestones, and psychiatric symptoms. Results: Significant birth cohort and regional differences were observed regarding bisexual identity milestones. Individuals who were older, transgender and/or nonbinary, and based in Taiwan disclosed their sexual identity more. All respondents reported clinically elevated depression and anxiety symptoms, with a majority experiencing moderately severe depression (60%) and moderate or severe anxiety (80%). Approximately half of respondents contemplated suicide in the past year. Compared with cisgender women, identifying as transgender and nonbinary assigned female at birth was significantly associated with increased depression and higher odds of suicidal ideation in the past year. Enhanced self-esteem was associated with greater well-being and decreased psychiatric symptoms. Experiencing family shame was associated with increased anxiety and depression. At the community level, living in Hong Kong was linked to lower depression and suicidal ideation compared to mainland China. The presence of an LGBT group correlated with improved psychological well-being. Conclusions: Chinese bisexual people face substantial risks for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, influenced by factors including self-esteem, transgender and nonbinary gender identity, family dynamics, and community context. Significant birth cohort and regional differences in bisexual identity development exist.
{"title":"Sexual Identity Development, Psychiatric Risk, and Protective Factors Among Bisexual People in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan.","authors":"Chongzheng Wei, Tania Israel, Shufang Sun","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to uncover sexual identity development and investigate the psychiatric risks for bisexual people across mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan by examining ecologically informed factors at the individual, family, and community levels. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An internet-based survey was administered to 685 respondents, from June to August 2021, reached primarily through lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community organizations and professional networks. Participants reported their demographics, identity milestones, and psychiatric symptoms. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Significant birth cohort and regional differences were observed regarding bisexual identity milestones. Individuals who were older, transgender and/or nonbinary, and based in Taiwan disclosed their sexual identity more. All respondents reported clinically elevated depression and anxiety symptoms, with a majority experiencing moderately severe depression (60%) and moderate or severe anxiety (80%). Approximately half of respondents contemplated suicide in the past year. Compared with cisgender women, identifying as transgender and nonbinary assigned female at birth was significantly associated with increased depression and higher odds of suicidal ideation in the past year. Enhanced self-esteem was associated with greater well-being and decreased psychiatric symptoms. Experiencing family shame was associated with increased anxiety and depression. At the community level, living in Hong Kong was linked to lower depression and suicidal ideation compared to mainland China. The presence of an LGBT group correlated with improved psychological well-being. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Chinese bisexual people face substantial risks for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, influenced by factors including self-esteem, transgender and nonbinary gender identity, family dynamics, and community context. Significant birth cohort and regional differences in bisexual identity development exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141971409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-01-30DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0043
Colin Burnett, Reece Lyerly, Bill M Jesdale
Purpose: This study was conducted to understand whether health education materials made specifically for members of sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups play a pivotal role in SGM cancer survivors' care satisfaction and experiences. Methods: We identified 2250 SGM cancer survivors who completed the "OUT: National Cancer Survey," conducted by the National LGBT Cancer Network in 2020-2021, and classified participants by their self-reported satisfaction with overall cancer care. We examined care satisfaction in relation to use of SGM-tailored health education resources and factors surrounding their SGM identities, which may influence their satisfaction, including feelings of safety with care teams. Results: Regardless of satisfaction with overall care, substantial proportions of survivors reported lacking vital health education resources specific to their SGM identities in areas of mental health (69%), physical activity (91%), tobacco use cessation (89%), and alcohol consumption (86%), despite attributing value to these materials. Contextualizing SGM survivor satisfaction with care, it was notable that among SGM survivors who felt safe with members of their care team knowing their SGM identity, only 3% were less than satisfied with their overall cancer care, compared to 38% who felt unsafe. Conclusion: SGM survivors value tailored information and health education resources that incorporate their intersectional identities. More research must be done to elucidate why SGM survivors do not receive these materials, while creating spaces where they feel safe receiving care. Increased delivery of SGM-tailored materials and prioritization of SGM safety in health care may have implications for overall cancer care satisfaction among SGM survivors.
{"title":"Overall Satisfaction with Cancer Care Among Sexual and Gender Minority People and Their Utilization of Identity-Tailored Health Education Materials.","authors":"Colin Burnett, Reece Lyerly, Bill M Jesdale","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0043","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study was conducted to understand whether health education materials made specifically for members of sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups play a pivotal role in SGM cancer survivors' care satisfaction and experiences. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 2250 SGM cancer survivors who completed the \"OUT: National Cancer Survey,\" conducted by the National LGBT Cancer Network in 2020-2021, and classified participants by their self-reported satisfaction with overall cancer care. We examined care satisfaction in relation to use of SGM-tailored health education resources and factors surrounding their SGM identities, which may influence their satisfaction, including feelings of safety with care teams. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Regardless of satisfaction with overall care, substantial proportions of survivors reported lacking vital health education resources specific to their SGM identities in areas of mental health (69%), physical activity (91%), tobacco use cessation (89%), and alcohol consumption (86%), despite attributing value to these materials. Contextualizing SGM survivor satisfaction with care, it was notable that among SGM survivors who felt safe with members of their care team knowing their SGM identity, only 3% were less than satisfied with their overall cancer care, compared to 38% who felt unsafe. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SGM survivors value tailored information and health education resources that incorporate their intersectional identities. More research must be done to elucidate why SGM survivors do not receive these materials, while creating spaces where they feel safe receiving care. Increased delivery of SGM-tailored materials and prioritization of SGM safety in health care may have implications for overall cancer care satisfaction among SGM survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139642511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-14DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0289
Deirdre A Shires, Leonardo Kattari, Haley Hill, Kaston D Anderson, Brayden Misiolek, Shanna K Kattari
Purpose: This study explores the sociodemographic, insurance coverage, and substance use differences among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals currently using hormone therapy (HT) and those who have an interest in future HT use. Methods: We surveyed TGD individuals in Michigan in 2018 to examine sociodemographic, health insurance, and substance use differences between those who had used HT and those who were interested but had never accessed HT using logistic regression models. Results: Respondents (N = 536) were 80.1% White and 18.0% nonbinary. About two-thirds of the participants had ever used HT (65.7%). In multivariate analyses, nonbinary participants were much more likely to be interested in future HT use than transmasculine individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 6.91), yet no significant difference between transmasculine and transfeminine individuals was found. Black participants also had higher odds of interest in future HT use (OR = 8.79). Those who did not know if they had trans-specific insurance coverage (OR = 42.39) and those who had no trans-specific insurance coverage (OR = 4.50) were more likely to be in the future interest group compared with those who reported full trans care coverage. Those with a bachelor's degree were less likely to be in the future interest group than those with some college education or an associate's degree, as were heavy marijuana users. Conclusion: Nonbinary individuals may be interested in HT but lack access, and known health care disparities around race and socioeconomic status may also impact HT access. Standard and transparent insurance coverage for gender-affirming care is sorely needed.
{"title":"Differences Between Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults in Michigan Currently Using Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Nonusers Reporting Interest in Future Use.","authors":"Deirdre A Shires, Leonardo Kattari, Haley Hill, Kaston D Anderson, Brayden Misiolek, Shanna K Kattari","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2022.0289","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2022.0289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study explores the sociodemographic, insurance coverage, and substance use differences among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals currently using hormone therapy (HT) and those who have an interest in future HT use. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We surveyed TGD individuals in Michigan in 2018 to examine sociodemographic, health insurance, and substance use differences between those who had used HT and those who were interested but had never accessed HT using logistic regression models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Respondents (<i>N</i> = 536) were 80.1% White and 18.0% nonbinary. About two-thirds of the participants had ever used HT (65.7%). In multivariate analyses, nonbinary participants were much more likely to be interested in future HT use than transmasculine individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 6.91), yet no significant difference between transmasculine and transfeminine individuals was found. Black participants also had higher odds of interest in future HT use (OR = 8.79). Those who did not know if they had trans-specific insurance coverage (OR = 42.39) and those who had no trans-specific insurance coverage (OR = 4.50) were more likely to be in the future interest group compared with those who reported full trans care coverage. Those with a bachelor's degree were less likely to be in the future interest group than those with some college education or an associate's degree, as were heavy marijuana users. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Nonbinary individuals may be interested in HT but lack access, and known health care disparities around race and socioeconomic status may also impact HT access. Standard and transparent insurance coverage for gender-affirming care is sorely needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"446-454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140945250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0317
Andrew Shin, Martin N Kathrins, Alex S Keuroghlian
Fertility preservation is the process of collecting and storing oocytes, sperm, or reproductive tissue so that a person may retain their ability to have biologically related children. In instances of infertility caused by medical intervention or an underlying medical condition, this procedure is often sought by affected patient populations. U.S. Title 21 regulations have produced disparities in access, disproportionately restricting services for sexually and gender diverse subpopulations capable of producing sperm. This article examines policies contributing to these disparities, explores how these policies may translate to real-world health care delivery, and proposes policy changes that would increase equitable access to care.
{"title":"Systemic Barriers to Fertility Preservation for Sexually and Gender Diverse Populations.","authors":"Andrew Shin, Martin N Kathrins, Alex S Keuroghlian","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0317","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fertility preservation is the process of collecting and storing oocytes, sperm, or reproductive tissue so that a person may retain their ability to have biologically related children. In instances of infertility caused by medical intervention or an underlying medical condition, this procedure is often sought by affected patient populations. U.S. Title 21 regulations have produced disparities in access, disproportionately restricting services for sexually and gender diverse subpopulations capable of producing sperm. This article examines policies contributing to these disparities, explores how these policies may translate to real-world health care delivery, and proposes policy changes that would increase equitable access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"415-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0220
Jay W Zussman, Jessica Y Ma, Jay G Bindman, Susannah Cornes, John A Davis, Sam Brondfield
Purpose: The "one-liner," commonly used in clinical communications, summarizes a patient's identity, presenting condition, medical history, and clinical findings. Imprecise, inconsistent use of gender and sex information in one-liners threatens the provision of affirming care to transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex patients and may exacerbate health care disparities. This study aimed to generate guidance for communicating gender and sex information in one-liners. Methods: This is an explanatory sequential, equal status mixed methods study of transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex people and clinicians caring for this population. Survey participants rated one-liners on a five-point Likert-type scale of appropriateness, considering affirmation and clinical utility, and provided open-ended comments. We conducted two focus groups with survey respondents to explore survey results and performed a thematic analysis of survey comments and focus group transcripts. Results: Survey respondents included 57 clinicians and 80 nonclinicians. One-liners containing patient pronouns were rated most appropriate, and appropriate patient descriptors included self-described gender identity or gender-neutral terms. In scenarios where patient sex information was not pertinent to the chief concern (CC), one-liners containing no sex information were rated most appropriate. Four themes were identified: inclusion of sex information based on relevance to the CC, accurate patient representation, influence of clinical setting, and risk of harm from inaccurate one-liners. Conclusion: This study generated data to support the appropriate use of gender and sex language in one-liners. Clinicians, educators, and trainees may use these findings to compose one-liners that are affirming and clinically useful for patients of diverse gender and sex identities.
目的:临床沟通中常用的 "单行本 "概括了患者的身份、病情、病史和临床发现。在单行本中不准确、不一致地使用性别和性信息,会威胁到为变性、非二元、性别扩张和双性患者提供平权医疗服务,并可能加剧医疗服务差异。本研究旨在为在单行本中传达性别信息提供指导。方法:这是一项针对变性人、非二元性人、性别开放性人和双性人以及护理这些人群的临床医生的解释性顺序、平等地位混合方法研究。调查参与者在五点李克特量表上对单行本的适当性进行评分,同时考虑到肯定性和临床实用性,并提供了开放式评论。我们与调查对象进行了两次焦点小组讨论,以探讨调查结果,并对调查意见和焦点小组讨论记录进行了主题分析。结果调查对象包括 57 名临床医生和 80 名非临床医生。包含患者代词的单行词语被评为最恰当的词语,恰当的患者描述词包括自我描述的性别认同或性别中性词语。在患者性别信息与主要问题(CC)不相关的情况下,不包含性别信息的单行词语被评为最恰当。研究确定了四个主题:根据与 CC 的相关性纳入性别信息、患者的准确表述、临床环境的影响以及不准确的单行词造成伤害的风险。结论:本研究得出的数据支持在单行词语中适当使用性别和性语言。临床医生、教育工作者和受训人员可以利用这些发现来编写单行语,使其对不同性别和性身份的患者具有肯定性和临床实用性。
{"title":"Identifying Strategies for the Use of Gender and Sex Language in Clinical One-Liners.","authors":"Jay W Zussman, Jessica Y Ma, Jay G Bindman, Susannah Cornes, John A Davis, Sam Brondfield","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0220","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The \"one-liner,\" commonly used in clinical communications, summarizes a patient's identity, presenting condition, medical history, and clinical findings. Imprecise, inconsistent use of gender and sex information in one-liners threatens the provision of affirming care to transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex patients and may exacerbate health care disparities. This study aimed to generate guidance for communicating gender and sex information in one-liners. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is an explanatory sequential, equal status mixed methods study of transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex people and clinicians caring for this population. Survey participants rated one-liners on a five-point Likert-type scale of appropriateness, considering affirmation and clinical utility, and provided open-ended comments. We conducted two focus groups with survey respondents to explore survey results and performed a thematic analysis of survey comments and focus group transcripts. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Survey respondents included 57 clinicians and 80 nonclinicians. One-liners containing patient pronouns were rated most appropriate, and appropriate patient descriptors included self-described gender identity or gender-neutral terms. In scenarios where patient sex information was not pertinent to the chief concern (CC), one-liners containing no sex information were rated most appropriate. Four themes were identified: inclusion of sex information based on relevance to the CC, accurate patient representation, influence of clinical setting, and risk of harm from inaccurate one-liners. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study generated data to support the appropriate use of gender and sex language in one-liners. Clinicians, educators, and trainees may use these findings to compose one-liners that are affirming and clinically useful for patients of diverse gender and sex identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"484-494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0335
Ryan D McIntosh, Emily C Andrus, Heather M Walline, Claire B Sandler, Christine M Goudsmit, Molly B Moravek, Daphna Stroumsa, Shanna K Kattari, Andrew F Brouwer
Purpose: The human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervicovaginal, oral, and anogenital cancer, and cervical cancer screening options include HPV testing of a clinician-collected sample. Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people assigned female at birth (AFAB) face many barriers to preventive care, including cancer screening. Self-sampling options may increase access and participation in HPV testing and cancer screening. This study estimated the prevalence of HPV in self-collected cervicovaginal, oral, and anal samples from Midwestern TGD individuals AFAB. Methods: We recruited TGD individuals AFAB for an observational study, mailing them materials to self-collect cervicovaginal, oral, and anal samples at home. We tested samples for high-risk (HR; 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59) and other HPV genotypes (6, 11, 66, 68, 73, 90) using a polymerase chain reaction mass array test. Prevalence ratios for HPV infection at each site as a function of participant characteristics were estimated in log-binomial models. Results: Out of 137 consenting participants, 102 completed sample collection. Among those with valid tests, 8.8% (HR = 6.6%; HPV 16/18 = 3.3%) were positive for oral HPV, 30.5% (HR = 26.8%; HPV 16/18 = 9.7%) for cervicovaginal HPV, and 39.6% (HR = 33.3%; HPV 16/18 = 8.3%) for anal HPV. A larger fraction of oral (71.4%) than anal infections (50.0%) were concordant with a cervicovaginal infection of the same type. Conclusions: We detected HR cervicovaginal, oral, and anal HPV in TGD people AFAB. It is essential that we reduce barriers to cancer screening for TGD populations, such as through the development of a clinically approved self-screening HPV test.
{"title":"Prevalence and Determinants of Cervicovaginal, Oral, and Anal Human Papillomavirus Infection in a Population of Transgender and Gender Diverse People Assigned Female at Birth.","authors":"Ryan D McIntosh, Emily C Andrus, Heather M Walline, Claire B Sandler, Christine M Goudsmit, Molly B Moravek, Daphna Stroumsa, Shanna K Kattari, Andrew F Brouwer","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0335","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervicovaginal, oral, and anogenital cancer, and cervical cancer screening options include HPV testing of a clinician-collected sample. Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people assigned female at birth (AFAB) face many barriers to preventive care, including cancer screening. Self-sampling options may increase access and participation in HPV testing and cancer screening. This study estimated the prevalence of HPV in self-collected cervicovaginal, oral, and anal samples from Midwestern TGD individuals AFAB. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We recruited TGD individuals AFAB for an observational study, mailing them materials to self-collect cervicovaginal, oral, and anal samples at home. We tested samples for high-risk (HR; 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59) and other HPV genotypes (6, 11, 66, 68, 73, 90) using a polymerase chain reaction mass array test. Prevalence ratios for HPV infection at each site as a function of participant characteristics were estimated in log-binomial models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 137 consenting participants, 102 completed sample collection. Among those with valid tests, 8.8% (HR = 6.6%; HPV 16/18 = 3.3%) were positive for oral HPV, 30.5% (HR = 26.8%; HPV 16/18 = 9.7%) for cervicovaginal HPV, and 39.6% (HR = 33.3%; HPV 16/18 = 8.3%) for anal HPV. A larger fraction of oral (71.4%) than anal infections (50.0%) were concordant with a cervicovaginal infection of the same type. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We detected HR cervicovaginal, oral, and anal HPV in TGD people AFAB. It is essential that we reduce barriers to cancer screening for TGD populations, such as through the development of a clinically approved self-screening HPV test.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449398/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140288471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura N MacMullin, Julia C Sorbara, Lindsay A Coome, Doug P VanderLaan, Mark R Palmert
Purpose: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth in North American clinical reports are predominantly White with relatively high socioeconomic status suggesting that access to gender-affirming care is inequitable. This study examined whether socioeconomic and social determinant of health discrepancies exist between a clinical population of TGD youth and surrounding communities. Methods: Patient postal codes were used to link the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG) to a clinic-based TGD youth cohort (n = 298). Using ON-MARG, each patient was assigned a quintile score from 1 (least marginalized) to 5 (most marginalized) on four marginalization measures. Mean quintile scores were compared to background populations. Census-based Toronto neighborhood-level data on ethnic diversity and educational status were also examined. Neighborhoods were categorized as highly represented, less represented, or unrepresented based on representation in the clinic cohort. One-way analysis of covariance was used to determine associations between neighborhood-level variables and the degree of neighborhood representation. Results: ON-MARG data demonstrated that clinic patients hailed from areas with more individuals having paid employment. Patients from Toronto and surrounding areas came, in general, from communities with fewer recent immigrants and visible minorities. Highly represented Toronto neighborhoods had smaller proportions of visible minorities and immigrants compared with less and unrepresented neighborhoods. Educational status, represented by adults with bachelor's degrees, was lower among unrepresented neighborhoods. Conclusion: TGD youth seen in clinic, particularly those from Toronto, are disproportionally White and socioeconomically advantaged. Further research is needed to better understand the underrepresentation of racialized and low-socioeconomic status youth and to inform strategies to improve access to care.
{"title":"Characteristics of Youth Presenting for Gender Care Compared to Background Populations: Examination of Social Determinants of Health.","authors":"Laura N MacMullin, Julia C Sorbara, Lindsay A Coome, Doug P VanderLaan, Mark R Palmert","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth in North American clinical reports are predominantly White with relatively high socioeconomic status suggesting that access to gender-affirming care is inequitable. This study examined whether socioeconomic and social determinant of health discrepancies exist between a clinical population of TGD youth and surrounding communities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patient postal codes were used to link the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG) to a clinic-based TGD youth cohort (<i>n</i> = 298). Using ON-MARG, each patient was assigned a quintile score from 1 (least marginalized) to 5 (most marginalized) on four marginalization measures. Mean quintile scores were compared to background populations. Census-based Toronto neighborhood-level data on ethnic diversity and educational status were also examined. Neighborhoods were categorized as highly represented, less represented, or unrepresented based on representation in the clinic cohort. One-way analysis of covariance was used to determine associations between neighborhood-level variables and the degree of neighborhood representation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ON-MARG data demonstrated that clinic patients hailed from areas with more individuals having paid employment. Patients from Toronto and surrounding areas came, in general, from communities with fewer recent immigrants and visible minorities. Highly represented Toronto neighborhoods had smaller proportions of visible minorities and immigrants compared with less and unrepresented neighborhoods. Educational status, represented by adults with bachelor's degrees, was lower among unrepresented neighborhoods. <b><i>Conclusion</i></b>: TGD youth seen in clinic, particularly those from Toronto, are disproportionally White and socioeconomically advantaged. Further research is needed to better understand the underrepresentation of racialized and low-socioeconomic status youth and to inform strategies to improve access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Richard A Brandon-Friedman, Ali Tabb, Teresa M Imburgia, Tayon R Swafford, J Dennis Fortenberry, Meredith Canada, Kelly L Donahue
Purpose: In the past 2 years, nearly all 50 states have debated bills seeking to ban minors' access to gender-affirming medical interventions, with many being passed into law. This study documents gender-diverse youths' (GDY) and their caregivers' experiences as they grapple with how such laws impact their families. Methods: Sixteen GDY and 16 caregivers participating in a longitudinal study of the impact of gender-affirming care on GDYs' well-being were interviewed about how the legal and social discourse was impacting them and their families. When interviewed, some participants had completed only the initial intake, others had completed the intake and an initial medical consultation, and a few had recently started gender-affirming hormones. Thematic analysis was used to identify common threads in the youths' and caregivers' experiences. Results: Four main themes were identified: Direct effects of losing access to gender-affirming medical interventions, reflecting how losing access to care would impact well-being; growing hostility toward the gender-diverse community, noting increasing social negativity; personal and social upheaval, reflecting the many aspects of families' lives affected; and galvanization into social action, documenting drives to effect social change. Conclusion: Laws banning gender-affirming medical interventions impact GDY and their families beyond limiting access to medical care. They increase the social stressors, cause social network disruptions, increase hostility toward the gender-diverse community, and lead some GDY and caregivers to engage more politically to protect their community. Gender-affirming health care providers need to recognize how the social and political environment impact GDY and their families to provide high-quality, person-centered care.
{"title":"Perspectives of Gender-Diverse Youth and Caregivers Facing Gender-Affirming Medical Intervention Bans.","authors":"Richard A Brandon-Friedman, Ali Tabb, Teresa M Imburgia, Tayon R Swafford, J Dennis Fortenberry, Meredith Canada, Kelly L Donahue","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> In the past 2 years, nearly all 50 states have debated bills seeking to ban minors' access to gender-affirming medical interventions, with many being passed into law. This study documents gender-diverse youths' (GDY) and their caregivers' experiences as they grapple with how such laws impact their families. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Sixteen GDY and 16 caregivers participating in a longitudinal study of the impact of gender-affirming care on GDYs' well-being were interviewed about how the legal and social discourse was impacting them and their families. When interviewed, some participants had completed only the initial intake, others had completed the intake and an initial medical consultation, and a few had recently started gender-affirming hormones. Thematic analysis was used to identify common threads in the youths' and caregivers' experiences. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four main themes were identified: Direct effects of losing access to gender-affirming medical interventions, reflecting how losing access to care would impact well-being; growing hostility toward the gender-diverse community, noting increasing social negativity; personal and social upheaval, reflecting the many aspects of families' lives affected; and galvanization into social action, documenting drives to effect social change. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Laws banning gender-affirming medical interventions impact GDY and their families beyond limiting access to medical care. They increase the social stressors, cause social network disruptions, increase hostility toward the gender-diverse community, and lead some GDY and caregivers to engage more politically to protect their community. Gender-affirming health care providers need to recognize how the social and political environment impact GDY and their families to provide high-quality, person-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141751962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marissa Nunes-Moreno, Anna Furniss, Samuel Cortez, Shanlee M Davis, Nadia Dowshen, Anne E Kazak, Leena Nahata, Laura Pyle, Daniel H Reirden, Beth Schwartz, Gina M Sequeira, Natalie J Nokoff
Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. Methods: Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (n = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (n = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. Results: TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). Conclusion: Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.
{"title":"Mental Health Diagnoses and Suicidality Among Transgender Youth in Hospital Settings.","authors":"Marissa Nunes-Moreno, Anna Furniss, Samuel Cortez, Shanlee M Davis, Nadia Dowshen, Anne E Kazak, Leena Nahata, Laura Pyle, Daniel H Reirden, Beth Schwartz, Gina M Sequeira, Natalie J Nokoff","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (<i>n</i> = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (<i>n</i> = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. <b><i>Results:</i></b> TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141627093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}