首页 > 最新文献

LGBT health最新文献

英文 中文
Intersectional Oppression-Based Stress, Drinking to Cope Motives, and Alcohol Use and Hazardous Drinking Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents Who Are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color. 黑人、原住民和有色人种青少年中基于压迫的交叉压力、饮酒应对动机以及酒精使用和危险饮酒。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2024.0023
Ethan H Mereish, Jessica R Abramson, Hyemin Lee, Ryan J Watson

Purpose: This study examined the associations between intersectional oppression-based stress and recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking among sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., queer or transgender) adolescents who were Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), also known as queer and transgender BIPOC (QTBIPOC) adolescents, and the mediating role of coping motives (i.e., drinking to cope) on these associations. Methods: Data were from a subsample of QTBIPOC adolescents who used alcohol in the past year (n = 1365) from a national U.S. sample of SGM adolescents aged 13-18 years. Results: Intersectional oppression-based stressors were associated with greater odds of recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking, as well as greater coping motives. Coping motives mediated the associations between intersectional-based stressors and both recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking among the aggregate sample of QTBIPOC adolescents, as well as among some subgroups of BIPOC adolescents. Conclusions: The results of this study highlight that intersectional oppression-based stressors are prevalent among QTBIPOC adolescents and serve as a risk factor for alcohol use and hazardous drinking. Multilevel interventions are needed to target and dismantle intersectional oppressions to address alcohol inequities impacting QTBIPOC adolescents. Drinking to cope motives mediated the associations between intersectional oppression-based stress and drinking outcomes, underscoring another important mechanism to target within a context of oppression in drinking interventions.

目的:本研究考察了性与性别少数群体(SGM,如同性恋或变性人)青少年中的黑人、土著人和有色人种(BIPOC)青少年(也称同性恋和变性人BIPOC青少年(QTBIPOC))基于交叉压迫的压力与近期饮酒和危险饮酒之间的关联,以及应对动机(即饮酒以应对)对这些关联的中介作用。研究方法:数据来自美国全国 13-18 岁 SGM 青少年样本中过去一年饮酒的 QTBIPOC 青少年子样本(n = 1365)。研究结果基于交叉压迫的压力因素与近期饮酒和危险饮酒的几率增加以及应对动机增加有关。在 QTBIPOC 青少年总样本中,以及在 BIPOC 青少年的一些亚群中,应对动机对基于交织的压力源与近期饮酒和危险饮酒之间的关联起着中介作用。结论:本研究的结果突出表明,基于跨部门压迫的压力因素在 QTBIPOC 青少年中普遍存在,并成为酗酒和危险饮酒的风险因素。需要采取多层次的干预措施,有针对性地消除交叉压迫,以解决影响 QTBIPOC 青少年的酒精不平等问题。为应对压力而饮酒的动机在基于交叉压迫的压力和饮酒结果之间起到了中介作用,这强调了在压迫背景下针对饮酒干预的另一个重要机制。
{"title":"Intersectional Oppression-Based Stress, Drinking to Cope Motives, and Alcohol Use and Hazardous Drinking Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents Who Are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color.","authors":"Ethan H Mereish, Jessica R Abramson, Hyemin Lee, Ryan J Watson","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0023","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study examined the associations between intersectional oppression-based stress and recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking among sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., queer or transgender) adolescents who were Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), also known as queer and transgender BIPOC (QTBIPOC) adolescents, and the mediating role of coping motives (i.e., drinking to cope) on these associations. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were from a subsample of QTBIPOC adolescents who used alcohol in the past year (<i>n</i> = 1365) from a national U.S. sample of SGM adolescents aged 13-18 years. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Intersectional oppression-based stressors were associated with greater odds of recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking, as well as greater coping motives. Coping motives mediated the associations between intersectional-based stressors and both recent alcohol use and hazardous drinking among the aggregate sample of QTBIPOC adolescents, as well as among some subgroups of BIPOC adolescents. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of this study highlight that intersectional oppression-based stressors are prevalent among QTBIPOC adolescents and serve as a risk factor for alcohol use and hazardous drinking. Multilevel interventions are needed to target and dismantle intersectional oppressions to address alcohol inequities impacting QTBIPOC adolescents. Drinking to cope motives mediated the associations between intersectional oppression-based stress and drinking outcomes, underscoring another important mechanism to target within a context of oppression in drinking interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Scoping Review of Suicide Prevention Interventions for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals. 针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者及其他在性取向和性别上属于少数群体的人的自杀预防干预措施的范围界定审查。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262
Cindy J Chang, Nicholas A Livingston, Katerine T Rashkovsky, Kelly L Harper, Kevin S Kuehn, Chandra Khalifian, Melanie S Harned, Raymond P Tucker, Colin A Depp

Purpose: This scoping review summarizes the literature on suicide-specific psychological interventions among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) people to synthesize existing findings and support future intervention research and dissemination. Methods: Electronic databases PsycInfo and PubMed were searched for reports of psychological intervention studies with suicide-related outcome data among LGBTQ+ people. A total of 1269 articles were screened, and 19 studies met inclusion criteria (k = 3 examined suicide-specific interventions tailored to LGBTQ+ people, k = 4 examined nontailored suicide-specific interventions, k = 11 examined minority stress- or LGBTQ+ interventions that were not suicide-specific, and k = 1 examined other types of interventions). Results: Synthesis of this literature was made challenging by varied study designs, and features limit confidence in the degree of internal and external validity of the interventions evaluated. The only established suicide-specific intervention examined was Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and minority stress- and LGBTQ-specific interventions rarely targeted suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Nevertheless, most interventions reviewed demonstrated support for feasibility and/or acceptability. Only five studies tested suicide-related outcome differences between an LGBTQ+ group and a cisgender/heterosexual group. These studies did not find significant differences in STBs, but certain subgroups such as bisexual individuals may exhibit specific treatment disparities. Conclusion: Given the dearth of research, more research examining interventions that may reduce STBs among LGBTQ+ people is critically needed to address this public health issue.

目的:本范围综述总结了针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者以及其他性少数群体和性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)的自杀心理干预文献,以归纳现有研究结果,支持未来的干预研究和传播。研究方法在电子数据库 PsycInfo 和 PubMed 中搜索了有关 LGBTQ+ 自杀相关结果数据的心理干预研究报告。共筛选出 1269 篇文章,其中 19 项研究符合纳入标准(k = 3 项研究针对 LGBTQ+ 群体的自杀干预,k = 4 项研究非针对自杀的干预,k = 11 项研究非针对自杀的少数群体压力或 LGBTQ+ 干预,k = 1 项研究其他类型的干预)。结果:由于研究设计各不相同,对这些文献进行综合具有挑战性,这些特点限制了人们对所评估干预措施的内部和外部有效性的信心。唯一一项针对自杀的成熟干预措施是辩证行为疗法,而针对少数群体压力和 LGBTQ 的干预措施很少针对自杀想法和行为(STBs)。尽管如此,所审查的大多数干预措施都证明了其可行性和/或可接受性。只有五项研究测试了 LGBTQ+ 群体与顺性别/异性恋群体之间与自杀相关的结果差异。这些研究并未发现 STB 的显著差异,但某些亚群体(如双性恋者)可能会表现出特殊的治疗差异。结论:鉴于研究的匮乏,我们亟需更多的研究来探讨可减少 LGBTQ+ 人士 STBs 的干预措施,以解决这一公共卫生问题。
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Suicide Prevention Interventions for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.","authors":"Cindy J Chang, Nicholas A Livingston, Katerine T Rashkovsky, Kelly L Harper, Kevin S Kuehn, Chandra Khalifian, Melanie S Harned, Raymond P Tucker, Colin A Depp","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This scoping review summarizes the literature on suicide-specific psychological interventions among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) people to synthesize existing findings and support future intervention research and dissemination. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Electronic databases PsycInfo and PubMed were searched for reports of psychological intervention studies with suicide-related outcome data among LGBTQ+ people. A total of 1269 articles were screened, and 19 studies met inclusion criteria (<i>k</i> = 3 examined suicide-specific interventions tailored to LGBTQ+ people, <i>k</i> = 4 examined nontailored suicide-specific interventions, <i>k</i> = 11 examined minority stress- or LGBTQ+ interventions that were not suicide-specific, and <i>k</i> = 1 examined other types of interventions). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Synthesis of this literature was made challenging by varied study designs, and features limit confidence in the degree of internal and external validity of the interventions evaluated. The only established suicide-specific intervention examined was Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and minority stress- and LGBTQ-specific interventions rarely targeted suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Nevertheless, most interventions reviewed demonstrated support for feasibility and/or acceptability. Only five studies tested suicide-related outcome differences between an LGBTQ+ group and a cisgender/heterosexual group. These studies did not find significant differences in STBs, but certain subgroups such as bisexual individuals may exhibit specific treatment disparities. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Given the dearth of research, more research examining interventions that may reduce STBs among LGBTQ+ people is critically needed to address this public health issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"89-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478965/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating Stigma Against At-Risk Sexual and Gender Minority Populations to End the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. 在撒哈拉以南非洲消除对高危性少数群体和性别少数群体的污名化。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2024.0110
Faraan O Rahim, Perisa Ashar, Robert Garofalo, Frank Mugisha, Chris Beyrer

In the past year, new laws criminalizing same-sex conduct and the promotion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights have emerged as barriers to addressing the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An augmented approach to addressing HIV within the region's disproportionately affected LGBTQ populations, particularly transgender women and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM), is imperative for achieving the international goal of ending the HIV epidemic by 2030. In this article, we present recommendations to bolster the continuum of HIV care for MSM and transgender women in SSA.

在过去的一年中,将同性行为定为刑事犯罪的新法律以及促进女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和同性恋者(LGBTQ)权利的工作已成为撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)应对艾滋病毒疫情的障碍。为了实现到 2030 年终结艾滋病毒流行的国际目标,必须采取强化措施,解决该地区受影响尤为严重的 LGBTQ 群体(尤其是变性妇女和男同性恋、双性恋及其他男男性行为者 (MSM))的艾滋病毒问题。在本文中,我们将提出建议,以加强对撒哈拉以南非洲地区男男性行为者和变性妇女的持续性艾滋病关怀。
{"title":"Navigating Stigma Against At-Risk Sexual and Gender Minority Populations to End the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Faraan O Rahim, Perisa Ashar, Robert Garofalo, Frank Mugisha, Chris Beyrer","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0110","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past year, new laws criminalizing same-sex conduct and the promotion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights have emerged as barriers to addressing the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An augmented approach to addressing HIV within the region's disproportionately affected LGBTQ populations, particularly transgender women and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM), is imperative for achieving the international goal of ending the HIV epidemic by 2030. In this article, we present recommendations to bolster the continuum of HIV care for MSM and transgender women in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"85-88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142469028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Canadian Health Research Funding Patterns for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations Reflect Exclusion of Women. 加拿大对性和性别少数群体的健康研究资助模式反映了对妇女的排斥。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2024.0014
Amanda B Namchuk, Tori N Stranges, Tallinn F L Splinter, Katherine N Moore, Carmen H Logie, Liisa A M Galea

Purpose: We explored the funding areas of Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (trans), queer or questioning, and intersex individuals (2S/LGBTQI)-specific health research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) mentioned in the grant abstracts. Methods: We analyzed the publicly available database of grant abstracts funded by CIHR from 2009-2020 to examine what types of 2S/LGBTQI-specific health outcomes would be studied and in what populations. Results: We found that 58% of awarded grant abstracts mentioned studying sexually transmitted diseases, the majority of which was on human immunodeficiency virus. Of the funded 2S/LGBTQI grant abstracts that specified the gender of the population to be studied (n=23), less then 9% mentioned studying cisgender women. Almost 40% mentioned including trans women/girls, and 30% mentioned including trans men/boys. None of the studies examined mentioned work with the Two-Spirit community. Conclusion: These results reflect larger social and health inequities that require structural level changes in research to support the 2S/LGBTQI community.

目的:我们探讨了拨款摘要中提到的加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR)资助的双灵、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人(跨性别)、同性恋或质疑者以及双性人(2S/LGBTQI)特定健康研究的资助领域。研究方法我们分析了 2009-2020 年由 CIHR 资助的、可公开获取的拨款摘要数据库,以研究将对哪些类型的 2S/LGBTQI 特定健康结果进行研究,以及在哪些人群中进行研究。结果:我们发现,在获得资助的论文摘要中,有 58% 提到了对性传播疾病的研究,其中大部分是关于人类免疫缺陷病毒的研究。在明确指出研究人群性别的 2S/LGBTQI 资助摘要中(n=23),只有不到 9% 的摘要提到研究顺性别女性。近 40% 的研究提到包括变性女性/女孩,30% 的研究提到包括变性男性/男孩。所审查的研究中没有一项提到与双灵群体的合作。结论这些结果反映了更大的社会和健康不平等,需要在研究中进行结构性变革,以支持双灵/LGBTQI 群体。
{"title":"Canadian Health Research Funding Patterns for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations Reflect Exclusion of Women.","authors":"Amanda B Namchuk, Tori N Stranges, Tallinn F L Splinter, Katherine N Moore, Carmen H Logie, Liisa A M Galea","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0014","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We explored the funding areas of Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (trans), queer or questioning, and intersex individuals (2S/LGBTQI)-specific health research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) mentioned in the grant abstracts. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed the publicly available database of grant abstracts funded by CIHR from 2009-2020 to examine what types of 2S/LGBTQI-specific health outcomes would be studied and in what populations. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We found that 58% of awarded grant abstracts mentioned studying sexually transmitted diseases, the majority of which was on human immunodeficiency virus. Of the funded 2S/LGBTQI grant abstracts that specified the gender of the population to be studied (n=23), less then 9% mentioned studying cisgender women. Almost 40% mentioned including trans women/girls, and 30% mentioned including trans men/boys. None of the studies examined mentioned work with the Two-Spirit community. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These results reflect larger social and health inequities that require structural level changes in research to support the 2S/LGBTQI community.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141580118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of Youth Presenting for Gender Care Compared to Background Populations: Examination of Social Determinants of Health. 与背景人群相比,接受性别护理的青少年的特征:研究健康的社会决定因素。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0271
Laura N MacMullin, Julia C Sorbara, Lindsay A Coome, Doug P VanderLaan, Mark R Palmert

Purpose: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth in North American clinireports are predominantly White with relatively high socioeconomic status suggesting that access to gender-affirming care is inequitable. This study examined whether socioeconomic and social determinant of health discrepancies exist between a clinical population of TGD youth and surrounding communities. Methods: Patient postal codes were used to link the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG) to a clinic-based TGD youth cohort (n = 298). Using ON-MARG, each patient was assigned a quintile score from 1 (least marginalized) to 5 (most marginalized) on four marginalization measures. Mean quintile scores were compared to background populations. Census-based Toronto neighborhood-level data on ethnic diversity and educational status were also examined. Neighborhoods were categorized as highly represented, less represented, or unrepresented based on representation in the clinic cohort. One-way analysis of covariance was used to determine associations between neighborhood-level variables and the degree of neighborhood representation. Results: ON-MARG data demonstrated that clinic patients hailed from areas with more individuals having paid employment. Patients from Toronto and surrounding areas came, in general, from communities with fewer recent immigrants and visible minorities. Highly represented Toronto neighborhoods had smaller proportions of visible minorities and immigrants compared with less and unrepresented neighborhoods. Educational status, represented by adults with bachelor's degrees, was lower among unrepresented neighborhoods. Conclusion: TGD youth seen in clinic, particularly those from Toronto, are disproportionally White and socioeconomically advantaged. Further research is needed to better understand the underrepresentation of racialized and low-socioeconomic status youth and to inform strategies to improve access to care.

目的:在北美的临床报告中,变性和性别多元化(TGD)青年主要是白人,社会经济地位相对较高,这表明获得性别确认护理的机会是不公平的。本研究调查了变性和性别多元化青少年临床人群与周边社区之间是否存在社会经济和健康社会决定因素方面的差异。研究方法使用患者邮政编码将安大略省边缘化指数(ON-MARG)与以诊所为基础的 TGD 青少年队列(n = 298)联系起来。利用安大略省边缘化指数(ON-MARG),为每位患者在四项边缘化指标上分配了从 1 分(边缘化程度最低)到 5 分(边缘化程度最高)的五分位数。平均五分法得分与背景人群进行了比较。此外,还对基于人口普查的多伦多社区层面的种族多样性和教育状况数据进行了研究。根据在诊所队列中的代表性,社区被划分为代表性高、代表性低或无代表性。采用单因子协方差分析法确定邻里水平变量与邻里代表性程度之间的关联。结果显示ON-MARG数据显示,诊所患者来自有更多有偿就业者的地区。多伦多及周边地区的患者一般来自新移民和有色人种较少的社区。多伦多代表性强的社区与代表性弱和无代表性的社区相比,明显少数族裔和移民的比例较低。在没有代表的社区中,拥有学士学位的成年人所代表的教育状况较低。结论在诊所就诊的同性恋、双性恋和变性青少年,尤其是来自多伦多的青少年中,白人和社会经济条件优越者占很大比例。需要进一步开展研究,以便更好地了解种族和社会经济地位较低的青少年就诊率偏低的情况,并为改善就诊策略提供依据。
{"title":"Characteristics of Youth Presenting for Gender Care Compared to Background Populations: Examination of Social Determinants of Health.","authors":"Laura N MacMullin, Julia C Sorbara, Lindsay A Coome, Doug P VanderLaan, Mark R Palmert","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0271","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth in North American clinireports are predominantly White with relatively high socioeconomic status suggesting that access to gender-affirming care is inequitable. This study examined whether socioeconomic and social determinant of health discrepancies exist between a clinical population of TGD youth and surrounding communities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patient postal codes were used to link the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG) to a clinic-based TGD youth cohort (<i>n</i> = 298). Using ON-MARG, each patient was assigned a quintile score from 1 (least marginalized) to 5 (most marginalized) on four marginalization measures. Mean quintile scores were compared to background populations. Census-based Toronto neighborhood-level data on ethnic diversity and educational status were also examined. Neighborhoods were categorized as highly represented, less represented, or unrepresented based on representation in the clinic cohort. One-way analysis of covariance was used to determine associations between neighborhood-level variables and the degree of neighborhood representation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ON-MARG data demonstrated that clinic patients hailed from areas with more individuals having paid employment. Patients from Toronto and surrounding areas came, in general, from communities with fewer recent immigrants and visible minorities. Highly represented Toronto neighborhoods had smaller proportions of visible minorities and immigrants compared with less and unrepresented neighborhoods. Educational status, represented by adults with bachelor's degrees, was lower among unrepresented neighborhoods. <b><i>Conclusion</i></b>: TGD youth seen in clinic, particularly those from Toronto, are disproportionally White and socioeconomically advantaged. Further research is needed to better understand the underrepresentation of racialized and low-socioeconomic status youth and to inform strategies to improve access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"116-124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships Among Determinants of Health, Cancer Screening Participation, and Sexual Minority Identity: A Systematic Review. 健康决定因素、癌症筛查参与度和少数性特征之间的关系:系统回顾
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0097
Callie Kluitenberg Harris, Horng-Shiuann Wu, Rebecca Lehto, Gwen Wyatt, Barbara Given

Purpose: To address cancer screening disparities and reduce cancer risk among sexual minority (SM) groups, this review identifies individual, interpersonal, and community/societal determinants of cancer screening (non)participation among differing SM identities. Methods: Seven scientific databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) used quantitative methods; (2) English language; (3) cancer screening focus; and (4) at least one SM group identified. Articles were excluded if: (1) analysis was not disaggregated by SM identity (n = 29) and (2) quantitative analysis excluded determinants of cancer screening (n = 19). The Sexual and Gender Minority Health Disparities Research Framework guided literature synthesis. Results: Twelve studies addressed cervical (n = 4), breast (n = 3), breast/cervical (n = 3), or multiple cancers (n = 2). Other cancers were excluded due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The total sample was 20,622 (mean 1525), including lesbian (n = 13,409), bisexual (n = 4442), gay (n = 1386), mostly heterosexual (n = 1302), and queer (n = 83) identities. Studies analyzing individual-level determinants (n = 8) found that socioeconomic status affected cervical, but not breast, cancer screening among lesbian and bisexual participants (n = 2). At the interpersonal level (n = 7), provider-patient relationship was a determinant of cervical cancer screening among lesbian participants (n = 4); a relationship not studied for other groups. Studies analyzing community/societal determinants (n = 5) found that rurality potentially affected cervical cancer screening among lesbian, but not bisexual people (n = 3). Conclusions: This review identified socioeconomic status, provider-patient relationship, and rurality as determinants affecting cancer screening among SM people. While literature addresses diverse SM groups, inclusion/exclusion criteria identified studies addressing cisgender women. Addressing disparities in the identified determinants of cervical cancer screening may improve participation among SM women. Further research is needed to understand determinants of cancer screening unique to other SM groups.

目的:为了解决性少数群体(SM)中癌症筛查的差异并降低癌症风险,本综述确定了不同性少数群体身份中(不)参与癌症筛查的个人、人际和社区/社会决定因素。方法:检索了七个科学数据库。纳入标准如下:(1) 使用定量方法;(2) 英语;(3) 癌症筛查重点;(4) 至少确定一个 SM 群体。在以下情况下,文章将被排除在外:(1) 分析未按 SM 身份分类(n = 29);(2) 定量分析不包括癌症筛查的决定因素(n = 19)。性与性别少数群体健康差异研究框架指导文献综述。结果:12 项研究涉及宫颈癌(4 项)、乳腺癌(3 项)、乳腺癌/宫颈癌(3 项)或多种癌症(2 项)。其他癌症因纳入/排除标准而被排除在外。样本总数为 20622(平均 1525),包括女同性恋(n = 13409)、双性恋(n = 4442)、男同性恋(n = 1386)、大部分为异性恋(n = 1302)和同性恋(n = 83)。分析个人层面决定因素的研究(n = 8)发现,社会经济地位影响了女同性恋和双性恋参与者的宫颈癌筛查,但不影响乳腺癌筛查(n = 2)。在人际关系层面(n = 7),提供者与患者的关系是女同参与者(n = 4)进行宫颈癌筛查的一个决定因素;其他群体未对这种关系进行研究。分析社区/社会决定因素的研究(n = 5)发现,乡村地区可能会影响女同性恋的宫颈癌筛查,但不会影响双性恋(n = 3)。结论:本综述将社会经济地位、医疗服务提供者与患者的关系以及乡村地区确定为影响 SM 群体癌症筛查的决定因素。虽然文献涉及不同的 SM 群体,但纳入/排除标准确定了针对顺性别女性的研究。解决已确定的宫颈癌筛查决定因素中的差异可能会提高 SM 妇女的参与率。要了解其他 SM 群体癌症筛查的独特决定因素,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Relationships Among Determinants of Health, Cancer Screening Participation, and Sexual Minority Identity: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Callie Kluitenberg Harris, Horng-Shiuann Wu, Rebecca Lehto, Gwen Wyatt, Barbara Given","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0097","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To address cancer screening disparities and reduce cancer risk among sexual minority (SM) groups, this review identifies individual, interpersonal, and community/societal determinants of cancer screening (non)participation among differing SM identities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Seven scientific databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) used quantitative methods; (2) English language; (3) cancer screening focus; and (4) at least one SM group identified. Articles were excluded if: (1) analysis was not disaggregated by SM identity (<i>n</i> = 29) and (2) quantitative analysis excluded determinants of cancer screening (<i>n</i> = 19). The Sexual and Gender Minority Health Disparities Research Framework guided literature synthesis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve studies addressed cervical (<i>n</i> = 4), breast (<i>n</i> = 3), breast/cervical (<i>n</i> = 3), or multiple cancers (<i>n</i> = 2). Other cancers were excluded due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The total sample was 20,622 (mean 1525), including lesbian (<i>n</i> = 13,409), bisexual (<i>n</i> = 4442), gay (<i>n</i> = 1386), mostly heterosexual (<i>n</i> = 1302), and queer (<i>n</i> = 83) identities. Studies analyzing individual-level determinants (<i>n</i> = 8) found that socioeconomic status affected cervical, but not breast, cancer screening among lesbian and bisexual participants (<i>n</i> = 2). At the interpersonal level (<i>n</i> = 7), provider-patient relationship was a determinant of cervical cancer screening among lesbian participants (<i>n</i> = 4); a relationship not studied for other groups. Studies analyzing community/societal determinants (<i>n</i> = 5) found that rurality potentially affected cervical cancer screening among lesbian, but not bisexual people (<i>n</i> = 3). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This review identified socioeconomic status, provider-patient relationship, and rurality as determinants affecting cancer screening among SM people. While literature addresses diverse SM groups, inclusion/exclusion criteria identified studies addressing cisgender women. Addressing disparities in the identified determinants of cervical cancer screening may improve participation among SM women. Further research is needed to understand determinants of cancer screening unique to other SM groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental Health Diagnoses and Suicidality Among Transgender Youth in Hospital Settings. 医院环境中变性青少年的心理健康诊断和自杀倾向。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0394
Marissa Nunes-Moreno, Anna Furniss, Samuel Cortez, Shanlee M Davis, Nadia Dowshen, Anne E Kazak, Leena Nahata, Laura Pyle, Daniel H Reirden, Beth Schwartz, Gina M Sequeira, Natalie J Nokoff

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. Methods: Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (n = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (n = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. Results: TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). Conclusion: Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.

目的:本分析旨在1)描述变性和性别多元化(TGD)青年与匹配对照组相比,在急诊科(ED)和住院病人中最常见的心理健康诊断;2)评估性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)或促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)处方是否会降低这些情况下的自杀风险。研究方法利用 PEDSnet 数据集(2009-2019 年),将 8-18 岁的 TGD 青少年(n = 3414,最后一次就诊时的中位年龄为 16.2 [14.4, 17.7]岁)与对照组(n = 13628,年龄为 16.6 [14.2, 18.3]岁)进行倾向得分匹配。与对照组相比,计算了TGD青少年在急诊室和住院环境中最常见精神健康诊断的相对风险。采用重复时间到事件分析法研究 GAHT 或 GnRHa 是否会降低 TGD 青少年子样本的自杀风险。结果显示与匹配的对照组相比,TGD 青少年在急诊室(5.46 [4.71-6.33] )和住院环境(6.61 [5.28-8.28] )中被诊断为精神疾病和自杀的相对风险(95% 置信区间 [CI])更高。与研究期间或开始使用 GAHT 之前从未使用过 GAHT 的 TGD 青少年相比,使用 GAHT 的 TGD 青少年的自杀风险降低了 43.6%(危险比 [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89])。与从未接受过 GnRHa 治疗的人群相比,接受过 GnRHa 治疗的 TGD 青少年的 ED 或住院自杀诊断率在统计学上有显著下降(HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31])。结论:尽管TGD青少年在急诊室和住院环境中的精神健康诊断和自杀风险很高,但GAHT处方与自杀风险的显著降低有关。
{"title":"Mental Health Diagnoses and Suicidality Among Transgender Youth in Hospital Settings.","authors":"Marissa Nunes-Moreno, Anna Furniss, Samuel Cortez, Shanlee M Davis, Nadia Dowshen, Anne E Kazak, Leena Nahata, Laura Pyle, Daniel H Reirden, Beth Schwartz, Gina M Sequeira, Natalie J Nokoff","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0394","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (<i>n</i> = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (<i>n</i> = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. <b><i>Results:</i></b> TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141627093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes Among Birthing People in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships in Louisiana. 路易斯安那州同性和异性关系生育者的不良产科和围产期结果。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0377
Dovile Vilda, Madina Agénor, Maeve E Wallace, Isabelle B Lian, Brittany M Charlton, Colleen A Reynolds, Emily W Harville

Purpose: We investigated sexual orientation disparities in several obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Louisiana and examined whether these disparities differed among Black, Latine, and White populations. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional vital records data on singleton live births in Louisiana (2016-2022). Same-sex relationships (SSR) vs. different-sex relationships (DSR) were classified based on the sex of the parents listed on the birth certificate. Using modified Poisson regression, we estimated adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals among birthing persons in SSR vs. DSR for preterm birth (PTB), low birthweight (LBW), spontaneous labor, Cesarean delivery, gestational hypertension, and gestational diabetes. We examined within and across group disparities in models stratified by sexual orientation and race/ethnicity. Results: In the total birthing population, those in SSR experienced higher risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes and were less likely to have spontaneous labor compared with persons in DSR. The risk of PTB and LBW was two-fold higher among Black birthing people in SSR compared with White birthing people in SSR and DSR. Latine birthing people in SSR experienced higher risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes compared with their peers in DSR and White people in DSR. Some of these disparities were partially explained by including socioeconomic and health risk factors. Conclusion: Sexual orientation-related disparities exist across and within racial/ethnic groups among birthing people in Louisiana. Adopting an intersectional approach that considers the mutually constituted nature of heterosexism and racism is critical to addressing sexual orientation-related inequities in reproductive and perinatal health.

目的:我们调查了路易斯安那州几种产科和围产期结果的性取向差异,并研究了这些差异在黑人、拉丁裔和白人中是否存在差异。研究方法我们分析了路易斯安那州单胎活产的横截面生命记录数据(2016-2022 年)。同性关系(SSR)与异性关系(DSR)根据出生证明上所列父母的性别进行分类。利用修正的泊松回归,我们估算了同性关系(SSR)与异性关系(DSR)的分娩者在早产(PTB)、低出生体重(LBW)、自然分娩、剖宫产、妊娠高血压和妊娠糖尿病方面的调整风险比和 95% 置信区间。我们在按性取向和种族/民族分层的模型中研究了组内和组间的差异。结果显示在所有分娩人群中,与 DSR 的人群相比,SSR 的人群患妊娠高血压和妊娠糖尿病的风险更高,自然分娩的可能性更小。在 SSR 的黑人分娩者与在 SSR 和 DSR 的白人分娩者相比,发生难产和低体重儿的风险高出两倍。与南部边境地区的同龄人和南部边境地区的白人相比,南部边境地区的拉丁裔分娩者患妊娠高血压和妊娠糖尿病的风险更高。社会经济和健康风险因素可以部分解释其中的一些差异。结论:在路易斯安那州的分娩人群中,不同种族/民族群体之间及内部都存在着与性取向相关的差异。采用一种考虑异性恋主义和种族主义相互构成性质的交叉方法,对于解决生殖和围产期健康中与性取向相关的不平等问题至关重要。
{"title":"Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes Among Birthing People in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships in Louisiana.","authors":"Dovile Vilda, Madina Agénor, Maeve E Wallace, Isabelle B Lian, Brittany M Charlton, Colleen A Reynolds, Emily W Harville","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0377","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We investigated sexual orientation disparities in several obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Louisiana and examined whether these disparities differed among Black, Latine, and White populations. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed cross-sectional vital records data on singleton live births in Louisiana (2016-2022). Same-sex relationships (SSR) vs. different-sex relationships (DSR) were classified based on the sex of the parents listed on the birth certificate. Using modified Poisson regression, we estimated adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals among birthing persons in SSR vs. DSR for preterm birth (PTB), low birthweight (LBW), spontaneous labor, Cesarean delivery, gestational hypertension, and gestational diabetes. We examined within and across group disparities in models stratified by sexual orientation and race/ethnicity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the total birthing population, those in SSR experienced higher risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes and were less likely to have spontaneous labor compared with persons in DSR. The risk of PTB and LBW was two-fold higher among Black birthing people in SSR compared with White birthing people in SSR and DSR. Latine birthing people in SSR experienced higher risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes compared with their peers in DSR and White people in DSR. Some of these disparities were partially explained by including socioeconomic and health risk factors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Sexual orientation-related disparities exist across and within racial/ethnic groups among birthing people in Louisiana. Adopting an intersectional approach that considers the mutually constituted nature of heterosexism and racism is critical to addressing sexual orientation-related inequities in reproductive and perinatal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexual Identity and Heavy Drinking Among Adults in Canada by Racially Minoritized Status and Income, 2015-2020. 2015-2020 年按少数族裔身份和收入分列的加拿大成年人的性特征和酗酒情况》(Sexual Identity and Heavy Drinking Among Adults in Canada by Racially Minoritized Status and Income)。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0187
Julian Gitelman, Brendan Smith, Christine M Warren, Alessandra T Andreacchi, Roman Pabayo, Erin Hobin

Purpose: Our objective was to estimate inequities in heavy drinking between heterosexual, gay or lesbian, and bisexual or pansexual individuals, by sex/gender, and to determine whether this association is heterogeneous across racially minoritized status and income groups in Canadians aged 15 and older. Methods: We pooled three Canadian Community Health Survey cycles (2015-2020) and used separate modified Poisson regressions to explore the sex/gender-specific association between sexual identity and heavy drinking prevalence by racially minoritized status, and income, adjusted for survey cycle, age, marital status, and region. Results: With racially minoritized status, and income categories collapsed, heavy drinking was 1.3 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.7) among bisexual or pansexual women compared with heterosexual women, with no differences among men. Among racially minoritized women, heavy drinking was 2.9 (95% CI = 1.3-6.4) times higher among bisexual or pansexual women and 1.9 (95% CI = 0.7-5.2) times higher among gay or lesbian women compared with heterosexual women. Among racially minoritized men, heavy drinking was 1.9 (95% CI = 0.9-4.0) times higher among gay men compared with heterosexual men. No differences were observed across sexual identity in White men or women. Bisexual or pansexual women reported increased heavy drinking relative to heterosexual women across income quintiles. Conclusion: Heavy drinking is distributed heterogeneously across sexual identity, sex/gender, racially minoritized status, and income. These results encourage equity-focused interventions to reduce heavy drinking among intersecting sociodemographic groups experiencing a greater burden of heavy drinking.

目的:我们的目的是按性别估计异性恋、男同性恋或女同性恋、双性恋或泛双性恋者之间在大量饮酒方面的不平等,并确定在 15 岁及以上的加拿大人中,这种关联在少数种族身份和收入群体中是否具有异质性。研究方法我们汇集了三个加拿大社区健康调查周期(2015-2020 年)的数据,并使用单独的修正泊松回归来探索性身份与少数民族身份和收入之间的特定性/性别关联,并对调查周期、年龄、婚姻状况和地区进行了调整。结果:将种族少数化状况和收入类别合并后,与异性恋女性相比,双性恋或泛双性恋女性的重度酗酒率是异性恋女性的 1.3 倍(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.0-1.7),而男性之间没有差异。在少数种族女性中,与异性恋女性相比,双性恋或泛双性恋女性的重度酗酒率是异性恋女性的 2.9 倍(95% 置信区间 = 1.3-6.4),同性恋女性的重度酗酒率是异性恋女性的 1.9 倍(95% 置信区间 = 0.7-5.2)。在少数种族男性中,与异性恋男性相比,同性恋男性的酗酒率是异性恋男性的 1.9 倍(95% CI = 0.9-4.0)。在白人男性或女性中,没有观察到不同性身份的差异。与异性恋女性相比,双性恋或泛双性恋女性的重度酗酒率在不同收入的五分位数中都有所上升。结论:重度饮酒在性身份、性/性别、少数种族身份和收入方面的分布是不均衡的。这些结果鼓励采取以公平为重点的干预措施,以减少交叉社会人口群体中的大量饮酒。
{"title":"Sexual Identity and Heavy Drinking Among Adults in Canada by Racially Minoritized Status and Income, 2015-2020.","authors":"Julian Gitelman, Brendan Smith, Christine M Warren, Alessandra T Andreacchi, Roman Pabayo, Erin Hobin","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0187","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Our objective was to estimate inequities in heavy drinking between heterosexual, gay or lesbian, and bisexual or pansexual individuals, by sex/gender, and to determine whether this association is heterogeneous across racially minoritized status and income groups in Canadians aged 15 and older. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We pooled three Canadian Community Health Survey cycles (2015-2020) and used separate modified Poisson regressions to explore the sex/gender-specific association between sexual identity and heavy drinking prevalence by racially minoritized status, and income, adjusted for survey cycle, age, marital status, and region. <b><i>Results:</i></b> With racially minoritized status, and income categories collapsed, heavy drinking was 1.3 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.7) among bisexual or pansexual women compared with heterosexual women, with no differences among men. Among racially minoritized women, heavy drinking was 2.9 (95% CI = 1.3-6.4) times higher among bisexual or pansexual women and 1.9 (95% CI = 0.7-5.2) times higher among gay or lesbian women compared with heterosexual women. Among racially minoritized men, heavy drinking was 1.9 (95% CI = 0.9-4.0) times higher among gay men compared with heterosexual men. No differences were observed across sexual identity in White men or women. Bisexual or pansexual women reported increased heavy drinking relative to heterosexual women across income quintiles. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Heavy drinking is distributed heterogeneously across sexual identity, sex/gender, racially minoritized status, and income. These results encourage equity-focused interventions to reduce heavy drinking among intersecting sociodemographic groups experiencing a greater burden of heavy drinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence, Determinants, and Trends in the Experience and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among a Cohort of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Montréal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada (2017-2022). 加拿大蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华男同性恋、双性恋和其他男性同性性行为者群体中亲密伴侣暴力的发生率、决定因素和趋势(2017-2022 年)。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0265
Stephen Juwono, Jorge Luis Flores Anato, Allison L Kirschbaum, Nicholas Metheny, Milada Dvorakova, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, David M Moore, Daniel Grace, Trevor A Hart, Gilles Lambert, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Joseph Cox, Mathieu Maheu-Giroux

Purpose: Longitudinal data on the experience and perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) are limited. We estimated the prevalence of past 6-month (P6M) physical and/or sexual IPV (hereafter IPV) experience and perpetration, identified their determinants, and assessed temporal trends, including the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic. Methods: We used data from the Engage Cohort Study (2017-2022) of GBM recruited using respondent-driven sampling in Montréal, Toronto, and Vancouver. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for determinants and self-reported P6M IPV were estimated using generalized estimating equations, accounting for attrition (inverse probability of censoring weights) and relevant covariates. Longitudinal trends of IPV were also assessed. Results: Between 2017 and 2022, 1455 partnered GBM (median age 32 years, 82% gay, and 71% White) had at least one follow-up visit. At baseline, 31% of participants experienced IPV in their lifetime and 17% reported ever perpetrating IPV. During follow-up, IPV experience was more common (6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5%-7%) than perpetration (4%, 95% CI: 3%-5%). Factors associated with P6M IPV experience included prior IPV experience (aPR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.76-4.08), lower education (aPR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.32-4.04), and substance use (injection aPR: 5.05, 95% CI: 2.54-10.05, non-injection aPR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.00-2.82). Similar factors were associated with IPV perpetration. IPV was stable over time; periods of COVID-19 restrictions were not associated with IPV changes in this cohort. Conclusion: Prevalence of IPV was high among GBM. Determinants related to marginalization were associated with an increased risk of IPV. Interventions should address these determinants to reduce IPV and improve health.

目的:有关男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBM)中亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)经历和实施情况的纵向数据非常有限。我们估算了过去 6 个月(P6M)的身体和/或性 IPV(以下简称 IPV)经历和实施率,确定了其决定因素,并评估了时间趋势,包括冠状病毒病 (COVID)-19 大流行的影响。方法:我们使用了在蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华通过受访者驱动的抽样调查招募的 GBM Engage 队列研究(2017-2022 年)的数据。使用广义估计方程估算了决定因素和自我报告的 P6M IPV 的调整流行率 (aPR),并考虑了自然减员(逆概率删减权重)和相关协变量。此外,还对 IPV 的纵向趋势进行了评估。结果2017 年至 2022 年间,1455 名有伴侣的 GBM(中位年龄 32 岁,82% 为同性恋,71% 为白人)进行了至少一次随访。基线时,31%的参与者在一生中经历过 IPV,17%的参与者称曾经实施过 IPV。在随访期间,经历 IPV 的比例(6%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:5%-7%)高于实施 IPV 的比例(4%,95% 置信区间:3%-5%)。与 P6M IPV 经历相关的因素包括之前的 IPV 经历(aPR:2.68,95% CI:1.76-4.08)、教育程度较低(aPR:2.31,95% CI:1.32-4.04)和药物使用(注射 aPR:5.05,95% CI:2.54-10.05,非注射 aPR:1.68,95% CI:1.00-2.82)。类似的因素也与实施 IPV 行为有关。IPV 随着时间的推移而趋于稳定;在这组人群中,COVID-19 限制期与 IPV 变化无关。结论:GBM 中 IPV 的发生率很高。与边缘化相关的决定因素与 IPV 风险增加有关。应针对这些决定因素采取干预措施,以减少 IPV 并改善健康状况。
{"title":"Prevalence, Determinants, and Trends in the Experience and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among a Cohort of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Montréal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada (2017-2022).","authors":"Stephen Juwono, Jorge Luis Flores Anato, Allison L Kirschbaum, Nicholas Metheny, Milada Dvorakova, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, David M Moore, Daniel Grace, Trevor A Hart, Gilles Lambert, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Joseph Cox, Mathieu Maheu-Giroux","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0265","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose</i></b>: Longitudinal data on the experience and perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) are limited. We estimated the prevalence of past 6-month (P6M) physical and/or sexual IPV (hereafter IPV) experience and perpetration, identified their determinants, and assessed temporal trends, including the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We used data from the <i>Engage Cohort Study</i> (2017-2022) of GBM recruited using respondent-driven sampling in Montréal, Toronto, and Vancouver. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for determinants and self-reported P6M IPV were estimated using generalized estimating equations, accounting for attrition (inverse probability of censoring weights) and relevant covariates. Longitudinal trends of IPV were also assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between 2017 and 2022, 1455 partnered GBM (median age 32 years, 82% gay, and 71% White) had at least one follow-up visit. At baseline, 31% of participants experienced IPV in their lifetime and 17% reported ever perpetrating IPV. During follow-up, IPV experience was more common (6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5%-7%) than perpetration (4%, 95% CI: 3%-5%). Factors associated with P6M IPV experience included prior IPV experience (aPR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.76-4.08), lower education (aPR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.32-4.04), and substance use (injection aPR: 5.05, 95% CI: 2.54-10.05, non-injection aPR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.00-2.82). Similar factors were associated with IPV perpetration. IPV was stable over time; periods of COVID-19 restrictions were not associated with IPV changes in this cohort. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Prevalence of IPV was high among GBM. Determinants related to marginalization were associated with an increased risk of IPV. Interventions should address these determinants to reduce IPV and improve health.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
LGBT health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1