首页 > 最新文献

Leukemia最新文献

英文 中文
Prognostic relevance of treatment deviations in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia who were treated in the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 study 在ALL-REZ BFM 2002研究中接受治疗的复发性急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童治疗偏差的预后相关性
IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02474-6
Eleni A. Argyriadi, Ingo G. Steffen, Christiane Chen-Santel, Andrej Lissat, Andishe Attarbaschi, Jean-Pierre Bourquin, Guenter Henze, Arend von Stackelberg

Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is among the most common causes of cancer-associated deaths in children. However, little is known about the implications of deviations from ALL treatment protocols on survival rates. The present study elucidates the various characteristics of treatment deviations in children with relapsed ALL included in the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 (i.e., Relapse Berlin-Frankfurt- Münster) trial and determines their prognostic relevance for relapse and death rates. Among 687 patients, 100 were identified with treatment deviations, further classified, and examined by occurrence time, cause and type. Protocol deviation was considered a time-dependent variable and its impact on Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) was examined using the time-dependent model Mantel Byar. Five years after the relapse diagnosis, deviations were significantly related to both inferior DFS (38%) and OS (57%) rates compared to protocol conformed treatment (DFS = 61%; OS = 70%, P < 0.001). Based on multivariate analyses, protocol deviation proved to be an independent adverse prognostic factor of DFS. Moreover, deviations triggered by chemotherapy-induced toxicity were associated with a higher relapse rate compared to deviations due to insufficient response. Therefore, to avoid impairment of results by deviations, future clinical trials, and treatment strategies should focus on less toxic treatments and stricter protocol compliance.

复发性急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)是儿童癌症相关死亡的最常见原因之一。然而,人们对偏离ALL治疗方案对生存率的影响知之甚少。本研究阐明了ALL- rez BFM 2002(即复发柏林-法兰克福- nster)试验中复发性ALL儿童治疗偏差的各种特征,并确定了它们与复发和死亡率的预后相关性。687例患者中,有100例患者存在治疗偏差,进一步进行分类,根据发生时间、原因、类型进行检查。方案偏差被认为是一个时间相关变量,其对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响使用时间相关模型Mantel Byar进行检验。复发诊断5年后,与方案符合治疗(DFS = 61%;OS = 70%, P < 0.001)。基于多变量分析,方案偏差被证明是DFS的一个独立的不良预后因素。此外,与反应不足引起的偏差相比,化疗引起的毒性引起的偏差与更高的复发率相关。因此,为了避免偏差对结果的损害,未来的临床试验和治疗策略应侧重于毒性较小的治疗和更严格的方案依从性。
{"title":"Prognostic relevance of treatment deviations in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia who were treated in the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 study","authors":"Eleni A. Argyriadi, Ingo G. Steffen, Christiane Chen-Santel, Andrej Lissat, Andishe Attarbaschi, Jean-Pierre Bourquin, Guenter Henze, Arend von Stackelberg","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02474-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02474-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is among the most common causes of cancer-associated deaths in children. However, little is known about the implications of deviations from ALL treatment protocols on survival rates. The present study elucidates the various characteristics of treatment deviations in children with relapsed ALL included in the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 (i.e., Relapse Berlin-Frankfurt- Münster) trial and determines their prognostic relevance for relapse and death rates. Among 687 patients, 100 were identified with treatment deviations, further classified, and examined by occurrence time, cause and type. Protocol deviation was considered a time-dependent variable and its impact on Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) was examined using the time-dependent model Mantel Byar. Five years after the relapse diagnosis, deviations were significantly related to both inferior DFS (38%) and OS (57%) rates compared to protocol conformed treatment (DFS = 61%; OS = 70%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Based on multivariate analyses, protocol deviation proved to be an independent adverse prognostic factor of DFS. Moreover, deviations triggered by chemotherapy-induced toxicity were associated with a higher relapse rate compared to deviations due to insufficient response. Therefore, to avoid impairment of results by deviations, future clinical trials, and treatment strategies should focus on less toxic treatments and stricter protocol compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142809726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surrogate endpoints in mature B-cell neoplasms – meaningful or misleading? 成熟b细胞肿瘤的替代终点——有意义还是误导?
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02483-5
Florian Simon, Othman Al-Sawaf, John F. Seymour, Barbara Eichhorst
Indolent mature B-cell neoplasms are a group of diseases in which recent therapeutic advances have led to an improved overall survival (OS) extending beyond several years. While cause of celebration for patients and caregivers, the increasingly long observation periods necessary to capture treatment effects are complicating trial design and possibly hindering swift access to more effective therapies. Surrogate endpoints are a tool with the potential of earlier study readouts, however, their validity needs to be proven in each individual disease and therapeutic setting. The validation of surrogate endpoints and available data for mature B-cell neoplasms are discussed within this perspective article, followed by an outlook on the potential of precise tools such as measurable residual disease assessment as novel surrogate candidates.
惰性成熟b细胞肿瘤是一类最近治疗进展导致总生存期(OS)延长数年以上的疾病。虽然患者和护理人员值得庆祝,但观察治疗效果所需的观察期越来越长,使试验设计复杂化,并可能阻碍快速获得更有效的治疗方法。替代终点是一种具有早期研究读数潜力的工具,然而,它们的有效性需要在每个个体疾病和治疗环境中得到证明。本文讨论了成熟b细胞肿瘤替代终点的验证和可用数据,然后展望了精确工具的潜力,如可测量的残留疾病评估作为新的替代候选。
{"title":"Surrogate endpoints in mature B-cell neoplasms – meaningful or misleading?","authors":"Florian Simon,&nbsp;Othman Al-Sawaf,&nbsp;John F. Seymour,&nbsp;Barbara Eichhorst","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02483-5","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41375-024-02483-5","url":null,"abstract":"Indolent mature B-cell neoplasms are a group of diseases in which recent therapeutic advances have led to an improved overall survival (OS) extending beyond several years. While cause of celebration for patients&nbsp;and caregivers, the increasingly long observation periods necessary to capture treatment effects are complicating trial design and possibly hindering swift access to more effective therapies. Surrogate endpoints are a tool with the potential of earlier study readouts, however, their validity needs to be proven in each individual disease and therapeutic setting. The validation of surrogate endpoints and available data for mature B-cell neoplasms are discussed within this perspective article, followed by an outlook on the potential of precise tools such as measurable residual disease assessment as novel surrogate candidates.","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"39 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02483-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142796999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence of Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the targeted therapy era 靶向治疗时代慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤Richter转化的发生率
IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4
Paul J. Hampel, Kari G. Rabe, Yucai Wang, Steven R. Hwang, Saad S. Kenderian, Eli Muchtar, Jose F. Leis, Amber B. Koehler, Mazie Tsang, Talal Hilal, Ricardo Parrondo, Rachel J. Bailen, Susan M. Schwager, Curtis A. Hanson, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Min Shi, Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Tait D. Shanafelt, Rebecca L. King, Timothy G. Call, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding, Sameer A. Parikh

Richter transformation (RT) is the histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT has devastating consequences with survival after transformation typically <1 year [1]. Estimates of RT frequency vary by study design, setting, and duration of follow-up. In several large studies from time periods when chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used to treat patients with CLL, RT rates have been reported between 2 and 10% after a median follow-up of 4–6 years from the time of diagnosis; these studies included patients with both newly diagnosed CLL and treated CLL [2,3,4,5,6]. Targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i), are now standard of care treatment for patients with CLL. High RT rates (up to 25%) reported in early studies with BTKi and BCL2i in relapsed CLL patients likely reflect increased RT risk among heavily pre-treated patients rather than risk due to these therapies themselves [7, 8]. Comparison of risk after specific treatment exposures from first-line clinical trials with CIT and targeted therapy arms is limited by the low numbers of RT events reported [9,10,11,12,13]. As the treatment paradigm for CLL has changed and CLL patients are living longer, we aimed to assess the current risk of developing RT and the potential impact of targeted therapies on that risk by comparing cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed CLL across different time periods.

Following IRB approval, we identified patients with previously untreated CLL in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were seen within 12 months of diagnosis. Only cases of biopsy proven DLBCL with histopathologic confirmation at Mayo Clinic were considered an RT event. Cumulative incidence methodology was used to display the time to development of RT, both from time of initial CLL diagnosis and from start of CLL-directed therapy, with death as a competing risk. We defined the period prior to February 2014 (FDA approval of ibrutinib for CLL) as the pre-targeted therapy era and the period after February 2014 as the targeted therapy era. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we compared the incidence of RT between patients diagnosed with CLL in the pre-targeted therapy era versus the targeted therapy era. Cox regression analysis was also used to investigate the association of effects of type of treatment exposure (time-dependent variable) on risk of RT. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Richter转化(RT)是慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL)向侵袭性淋巴瘤的组织学转化,最常见的是弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)。RT对转化后的生存具有毁灭性的影响,通常为1年。RT频率的估计因研究设计、环境和随访时间而异。在使用化学免疫疗法(CIT)治疗CLL患者的几项大型研究中,在诊断后4-6年的中位随访后,RT率报道在2%至10%之间;这些研究既包括新诊断的CLL患者,也包括已治疗的CLL患者[2,3,4,5,6]。靶向治疗,包括布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)和b细胞淋巴瘤2抑制剂(BCL2i),现在是CLL患者的标准护理治疗。BTKi和BCL2i在复发CLL患者中的早期研究中报道的高RT率(高达25%)可能反映了大量预处理患者RT风险的增加,而不是由于这些治疗本身的风险[7,8]。CIT和靶向治疗组一线临床试验特异性治疗暴露后的风险比较受到报道的低RT事件数量的限制[9,10,11,12,13]。由于CLL的治疗模式发生了变化,CLL患者的寿命更长,我们旨在通过比较不同时期新诊断的CLL患者队列,评估目前发展为RT的风险以及靶向治疗对该风险的潜在影响。在IRB批准后,我们在梅奥诊所CLL数据库中发现了诊断后12个月内未治疗的CLL患者。只有在梅奥诊所活检证实DLBCL并经组织病理学证实的病例才被认为是RT事件。累积发病率方法学用于显示从初始CLL诊断时间和从CLL定向治疗开始到RT发展的时间,死亡是一个竞争风险。我们将2014年2月(FDA批准ibrutinib治疗CLL)之前的时期定义为预靶向治疗时代,2014年2月之后的时期定义为靶向治疗时代。使用Cox比例风险回归分析,我们比较了靶向治疗前和靶向治疗时期诊断为CLL患者的RT发生率。还采用Cox回归分析来调查治疗暴露类型(时间相关变量)对rt风险的影响。使用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA)进行统计分析。
{"title":"Incidence of Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the targeted therapy era","authors":"Paul J. Hampel, Kari G. Rabe, Yucai Wang, Steven R. Hwang, Saad S. Kenderian, Eli Muchtar, Jose F. Leis, Amber B. Koehler, Mazie Tsang, Talal Hilal, Ricardo Parrondo, Rachel J. Bailen, Susan M. Schwager, Curtis A. Hanson, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Min Shi, Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Tait D. Shanafelt, Rebecca L. King, Timothy G. Call, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding, Sameer A. Parikh","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Richter transformation (RT) is the histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT has devastating consequences with survival after transformation typically &lt;1 year [1]. Estimates of RT frequency vary by study design, setting, and duration of follow-up. In several large studies from time periods when chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used to treat patients with CLL, RT rates have been reported between 2 and 10% after a median follow-up of 4–6 years from the time of diagnosis; these studies included patients with both newly diagnosed CLL and treated CLL [2,3,4,5,6]. Targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i), are now standard of care treatment for patients with CLL. High RT rates (up to 25%) reported in early studies with BTKi and BCL2i in relapsed CLL patients likely reflect increased RT risk among heavily pre-treated patients rather than risk due to these therapies themselves [7, 8]. Comparison of risk after specific treatment exposures from first-line clinical trials with CIT and targeted therapy arms is limited by the low numbers of RT events reported [9,10,11,12,13]. As the treatment paradigm for CLL has changed and CLL patients are living longer, we aimed to assess the current risk of developing RT and the potential impact of targeted therapies on that risk by comparing cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed CLL across different time periods.</p><p>Following IRB approval, we identified patients with previously untreated CLL in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were seen within 12 months of diagnosis. Only cases of biopsy proven DLBCL with histopathologic confirmation at Mayo Clinic were considered an RT event. Cumulative incidence methodology was used to display the time to development of RT, both from time of initial CLL diagnosis and from start of CLL-directed therapy, with death as a competing risk. We defined the period prior to February 2014 (FDA approval of ibrutinib for CLL) as the pre-targeted therapy era and the period after February 2014 as the targeted therapy era. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we compared the incidence of RT between patients diagnosed with CLL in the pre-targeted therapy era versus the targeted therapy era. Cox regression analysis was also used to investigate the association of effects of type of treatment exposure (time-dependent variable) on risk of RT. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142796997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;21)(p11;q22)/FUS::ERG 同种异体造血干细胞移植治疗成人急性髓性白血病伴t(16;21)(p11;q22)/FUS::ERG
IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02495-1
Satoshi Mitsuyuki, Yoshimitsu Shimomura, Hiroki Mizumaki, Masamitsu Yanada, Shohei Mizuno, Naoyuki Uchida, Noriko Doki, Ayumu Ito, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Yuta Katayama, Satoshi Yoshihara, Tetsuya Eto, Satoru Takada, Shuichi Ota, Masako Toyosaki, Yuta Hasegawa, Hirohisa Nakamae, Koji Kawamura, Makoto Onizuka, Takahiro Fukuda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takaaki Konuma
<p>The t(16;21)(p11;q22) translocation is a rare but non-random chromosomal abnormality that accounts for approximately 1% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1, 2]. This chromosomal translocation produces a fusion gene between the <i>FUS</i> gene at chromosome 16p11 and the <i>ERG</i> gene at chromosome 21q22. Recent cytogenetic stratification classifies the sole abnormality of t(16;21)(p11;q22) as intermediate risk [1]. However, previous reports [2,3,4] suggest that the prognosis for AML patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22) is generally significantly worse, and evidence regarding allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for AML patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22) is still lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the survival outcomes of AML with t(16;21)(p11;q22) after allogeneic HSCT and compared them with those of other AML patients using Japanese transplant registry data.</p><p>The clinical data were provided by the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japan Society for Transplantation and the Cellular Therapy and the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [5,6,7]. Our study included patients with AML aged ≥16 years who received their first allogeneic HSCT between 1986 and 2021. Patients with a favorable-risk karyotype were excluded, as t(16;21)(p11;q22) is not classified as favorable according to the karyotype risk classification. This study was approved by the Data Management Committee of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and the Ethics Committee of Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital. Cytogenetic information was obtained at diagnosis or before allogeneic HSCT. The cytogenetic risk was classified as favorable, intermediate, or poor in accordance with the criteria provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines (Version 1.2016) [8]. Due to insufficient data, in some cases, the t(16;21) translocation was identified, but their breakpoints were unknown (t(16;21) BU [breakpoint unknown]). Chromosomal translocations involving chromosomes 16 and 21 seen in AML include t(16;21)(q24;q22), as well as t(16;21)(p11;q22) [9]. However, t(16;21)(q24;q22) is notably rare in adult AML [3, 4, 9]; therefore, we considered t(16;21) BU as t(16;21)(p11;q22) in our analysis. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis comparing patient characteristics and survival data between the t(16;21) BU and t(16;21)(p11;q22) groups to identify potential misclassifications. Other detailed definitions of variables and endpoints are described in Supplementary materials. The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). For survival analysis, the Kaplan–Meier method was used for OS and PFS, while the Gray’s method was used for relapse and NRM to account for competing risks. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model for OS and PFS or a Fine and Gray proportional
t(16;21)(p11;q22)易位是一种罕见但非随机的染色体异常,约占急性髓性白血病(AML)病例的1%[1,2]。这种染色体易位在16p11染色体上的FUS基因和21q22染色体上的ERG基因之间产生融合基因。最近的细胞遗传学分层将t(16;21)(p11;q22)唯一的异常归为中危[1]。然而,以往的报道[2,3,4]表明,合并t(16;21)(p11;q22)的AML患者的预后通常明显较差,并且关于同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗合并t(16;21)(p11;q22)的证据仍然缺乏。因此,本研究评估了同种异体造血干细胞移植后AML伴t(16;21)(p11;q22)的生存结果,并使用日本移植登记数据将其与其他AML患者的生存结果进行了比较。临床数据由日本移植和细胞治疗学会移植登记统一管理计划2和日本造血细胞移植数据中心提供[5,6,7]。我们的研究纳入了年龄≥16岁的AML患者,这些患者在1986年至2021年间接受了第一次同种异体造血干细胞移植。由于t(16;21)(p11;q22)未按核型风险分类为有利,因此排除了有利核型的患者。本研究经日本造血细胞移植数据中心数据管理委员会和神户市医疗中心总医院伦理委员会批准。在诊断时或同种异体造血干细胞移植前获得细胞遗传学信息。根据美国国家综合癌症网络指南(Version 1.2016)[8]提供的标准,细胞遗传学风险分为有利、中等或较差。由于数据不足,在某些情况下,虽然发现了t(16;21)易位,但断点未知(t(16;21) BU[断点未知])。AML中涉及16号和21号染色体的染色体易位包括t(16;21)(q24;q22),以及t(16;21)(p11;q22)[9]。然而,t(16;21)(q24;q22)在成人AML中非常罕见[3,4,9];因此,我们认为t(16;21) BU在我们的分析中为t(16;21)(p11;q22)。此外,我们进行了敏感性分析,比较t(16;21) BU组和t(16;21)(p11;q22)组之间的患者特征和生存数据,以识别潜在的错误分类。其他变量和端点的详细定义在补充材料中描述。研究终点为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、复发和非复发死亡率(NRM)。对于生存分析,Kaplan-Meier法用于OS和PFS,而Gray法用于复发和NRM,以解释竞争风险。多变量分析采用OS和PFS的Cox比例风险模型或复发和NRM的Fine和Gray比例风险模型。采用Fine and Gray方法来考虑竞争风险。P <; 0.05为统计学意义。所有统计分析均采用R软件(版本4.3.2;R开发核心团队)。
{"title":"Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;21)(p11;q22)/FUS::ERG","authors":"Satoshi Mitsuyuki, Yoshimitsu Shimomura, Hiroki Mizumaki, Masamitsu Yanada, Shohei Mizuno, Naoyuki Uchida, Noriko Doki, Ayumu Ito, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Yuta Katayama, Satoshi Yoshihara, Tetsuya Eto, Satoru Takada, Shuichi Ota, Masako Toyosaki, Yuta Hasegawa, Hirohisa Nakamae, Koji Kawamura, Makoto Onizuka, Takahiro Fukuda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takaaki Konuma","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02495-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02495-1","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The t(16;21)(p11;q22) translocation is a rare but non-random chromosomal abnormality that accounts for approximately 1% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1, 2]. This chromosomal translocation produces a fusion gene between the &lt;i&gt;FUS&lt;/i&gt; gene at chromosome 16p11 and the &lt;i&gt;ERG&lt;/i&gt; gene at chromosome 21q22. Recent cytogenetic stratification classifies the sole abnormality of t(16;21)(p11;q22) as intermediate risk [1]. However, previous reports [2,3,4] suggest that the prognosis for AML patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22) is generally significantly worse, and evidence regarding allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for AML patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22) is still lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the survival outcomes of AML with t(16;21)(p11;q22) after allogeneic HSCT and compared them with those of other AML patients using Japanese transplant registry data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The clinical data were provided by the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japan Society for Transplantation and the Cellular Therapy and the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [5,6,7]. Our study included patients with AML aged ≥16 years who received their first allogeneic HSCT between 1986 and 2021. Patients with a favorable-risk karyotype were excluded, as t(16;21)(p11;q22) is not classified as favorable according to the karyotype risk classification. This study was approved by the Data Management Committee of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and the Ethics Committee of Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital. Cytogenetic information was obtained at diagnosis or before allogeneic HSCT. The cytogenetic risk was classified as favorable, intermediate, or poor in accordance with the criteria provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines (Version 1.2016) [8]. Due to insufficient data, in some cases, the t(16;21) translocation was identified, but their breakpoints were unknown (t(16;21) BU [breakpoint unknown]). Chromosomal translocations involving chromosomes 16 and 21 seen in AML include t(16;21)(q24;q22), as well as t(16;21)(p11;q22) [9]. However, t(16;21)(q24;q22) is notably rare in adult AML [3, 4, 9]; therefore, we considered t(16;21) BU as t(16;21)(p11;q22) in our analysis. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis comparing patient characteristics and survival data between the t(16;21) BU and t(16;21)(p11;q22) groups to identify potential misclassifications. Other detailed definitions of variables and endpoints are described in Supplementary materials. The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). For survival analysis, the Kaplan–Meier method was used for OS and PFS, while the Gray’s method was used for relapse and NRM to account for competing risks. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model for OS and PFS or a Fine and Gray proportional ","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142796998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there really an accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia at presentation? 慢性髓性白血病在发病时真的有加速期吗?
IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02486-2
Sen Yang, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Robert Peter Gale, Xiaojun Huang, Qian Jiang

Whether there is really a distinct accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in the context of tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI)-therapy is controversial. We studied 2122 consecutive subjects in chronic phase (CP, n = 1837) or AP (n = 285) at diagnosis classified according to the 2020 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification. AP subjects with increased basophils only had similar transformation-free survival (TFS) and survival compared with CP subjects classified as ELTS intermediate-risk. Those with increased blasts only had worse TFS but similar survival compared with CP subjects classified as ELTS high-risk. AP subjects with decreased platelets only had similar TFS but worse survival compared with subjects classified as ELTS high-risk. Proportions of CP and AP subjects meeting the 2020 ELN TKI-response milestones were similar. However, worse TFS at 3-month and survival at 6- or 12-month were only in AP subjects failing to meet ELN milestones. Findings were similar using the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria for AP replacing decreased platelets with additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Our data support the 2022 WHO classification of CML eliminating AP. We suggest adding a very high-risk cohort to the ELTS score including people with increased blasts or decreased platelets and dividing CML into 2 phases at diagnosis: CP and acute or blast phases.

在酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的背景下,慢性髓性白血病(CML)的诊断是否真的存在明显的加速期(AP)是有争议的。我们研究了2122名连续受试者,根据2020年欧洲白血病网(ELN)分类,诊断为慢年期(CP, n = 1837)或AP (n = 285)。嗜碱性粒细胞增加的AP受试者与被归类为elt中风险的CP受试者相比,只有相似的无转化生存期(TFS)和生存期。与被归类为ELTS高风险的CP受试者相比,那些爆炸增加的患者只有更差的TFS,但生存率相似。血小板减少的AP患者与ELTS高危患者相比,TFS相似,但生存率更差。CP和AP受试者达到2020年ELN tki反应里程碑的比例相似。然而,只有未达到ELN里程碑的AP受试者在3个月时的TFS和6或12个月时的生存率较差。使用2022年国际共识分类(ICC)标准,AP取代血小板减少并伴有额外的细胞遗传学异常,结果相似。我们的数据支持WHO对2022年排除AP的CML的分类。我们建议在ELTS评分中加入一个非常高风险的队列,包括血小板增加或血小板减少的患者,并在诊断时将CML分为2期:CP期和急性期或blast期。
{"title":"Is there really an accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia at presentation?","authors":"Sen Yang, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Robert Peter Gale, Xiaojun Huang, Qian Jiang","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02486-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02486-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether there is really a distinct accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in the context of tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI)-therapy is controversial. We studied 2122 consecutive subjects in chronic phase (CP, <i>n</i> = 1837) or AP (<i>n</i> = 285) at diagnosis classified according to the 2020 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification. AP subjects with increased basophils only had similar transformation-free survival (TFS) and survival compared with CP subjects classified as ELTS intermediate-risk. Those with increased blasts only had worse TFS but similar survival compared with CP subjects classified as ELTS high-risk. AP subjects with decreased platelets only had similar TFS but worse survival compared with subjects classified as ELTS high-risk. Proportions of CP and AP subjects meeting the 2020 ELN TKI-response milestones were similar. However, worse TFS at 3-month and survival at 6- or 12-month were only in AP subjects failing to meet ELN milestones. Findings were similar using the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria for AP replacing decreased platelets with additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Our data support the 2022 WHO classification of CML eliminating AP. We suggest adding a very high-risk cohort to the ELTS score including people with increased blasts or decreased platelets and dividing CML into 2 phases at diagnosis: CP and acute or blast phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142763190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
HMX3 is a critical vulnerability in MECOM-negative KMT2A::MLLT3 acute myelomonocytic leukemia HMX3是mecom阴性KMT2A::MLLT3急性髓单细胞白血病的一个关键易感性
IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02485-3
Saioa Arza-Apalategi, Branco M. H. Heuts, Saskia M. Bergevoet, Roos Meering, Daan Gilissen, Pascal W. T. C. Jansen, Anja Krippner-Heidenreich, Peter J. M. Valk, Michiel Vermeulen, Olaf Heidenreich, Torsten Haferlach, Joop H. Jansen, Joost H. A. Martens, Bert A. van der Reijden

KMT2A::MLLT3 acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML) comes in two clinically and biologically different subtypes. One is characterized by inferior outcome, older age, and MECOM oncogene expression. The other is mainly observed in children and young adults, associates with better clinical outcome, but lacks MECOM. To identify cell fate determining transcription factors downstream of KMT2A::MLLT3, we applied a bioinformatic algorithm that integrates gene and enhancer expression from primary MECOM-positive and -negative KMT2A::MLLT3 AML samples. This identified MECOM to be most influential in the MECOM-positive group, while neuronal transcription factor HMX3 was most influential in the MECOM-negative group. In large AML cohorts, HMX3 expression associated with a unique gene expression profile, younger age (p < 0.002) and KMT2A-rearranged and KAT6A-CREBBP leukemia (p < 0.00001). HMX3 was not expressed in other major genetic risk groups and healthy blood cells. RNA-sequencing analyses following forced HMX3 expression in healthy CD34+ cells and its silencing in KMT2A::MLT3 cells showed that HMX3 drives cancer-associated E2F and MYC gene programs (p < 0.001). HMX3 expression in healthy CD34+ cells blocked monocytic but not granulocytic colony formation. Strikingly, HMX3 silencing in KMT2A::MLLT3 patient cells resulted in cell cycle arrest, monocytic differentiation and apoptosis. Thus, the neuronal transcription factor HMX3 is a leukemia-specific vulnerability in KMT2A::MLLT3 AML.

KMT2A::MLLT3急性髓细胞白血病(AML)有两种临床和生物学上不同的亚型。一种以预后差、年龄大、MECOM癌基因表达为特征。另一种主要在儿童和年轻人中观察到,与较好的临床结果相关,但缺乏MECOM。为了鉴定KMT2A::MLLT3下游决定细胞命运的转录因子,我们应用了一种生物信息学算法,整合了mecom阳性和阴性KMT2A::MLLT3 AML样品的基因和增强子表达。这表明MECOM在MECOM阳性组中影响最大,而神经元转录因子HMX3在MECOM阴性组中影响最大。在大型AML队列中,HMX3表达与独特的基因表达谱、年轻(p < 0.002)和kmt2a -重排和KAT6A-CREBBP白血病(p < 0.00001)相关。HMX3在其他主要遗传风险组和健康血细胞中不表达。在健康CD34+细胞中强制表达HMX3及其在KMT2A::MLT3细胞中的沉默后的rna测序分析显示,HMX3驱动癌症相关的E2F和MYC基因程序(p < 0.001)。HMX3在健康CD34+细胞中的表达阻断单核细胞集落形成,但不阻断粒细胞集落形成。引人注目的是,在KMT2A::MLLT3患者细胞中,HMX3沉默导致细胞周期阻滞、单核细胞分化和凋亡。因此,神经元转录因子HMX3在KMT2A::MLLT3 AML中是白血病特异性易感性。
{"title":"HMX3 is a critical vulnerability in MECOM-negative KMT2A::MLLT3 acute myelomonocytic leukemia","authors":"Saioa Arza-Apalategi, Branco M. H. Heuts, Saskia M. Bergevoet, Roos Meering, Daan Gilissen, Pascal W. T. C. Jansen, Anja Krippner-Heidenreich, Peter J. M. Valk, Michiel Vermeulen, Olaf Heidenreich, Torsten Haferlach, Joop H. Jansen, Joost H. A. Martens, Bert A. van der Reijden","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02485-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02485-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>KMT2A::MLLT3 acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML) comes in two clinically and biologically different subtypes. One is characterized by inferior outcome, older age, and MECOM oncogene expression. The other is mainly observed in children and young adults, associates with better clinical outcome, but lacks MECOM. To identify cell fate determining transcription factors downstream of KMT2A::MLLT3, we applied a bioinformatic algorithm that integrates gene and enhancer expression from primary MECOM-positive and -negative KMT2A::MLLT3 AML samples. This identified MECOM to be most influential in the MECOM-positive group, while neuronal transcription factor HMX3 was most influential in the MECOM-negative group. In large AML cohorts, HMX3 expression associated with a unique gene expression profile, younger age (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.002) and KMT2A-rearranged and KAT6A-CREBBP leukemia (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001). HMX3 was not expressed in other major genetic risk groups and healthy blood cells. RNA-sequencing analyses following forced HMX3 expression in healthy CD34+ cells and its silencing in KMT2A::MLT3 cells showed that HMX3 drives cancer-associated E2F and MYC gene programs (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). HMX3 expression in healthy CD34+ cells blocked monocytic but not granulocytic colony formation. Strikingly, HMX3 silencing in KMT2A::MLLT3 patient cells resulted in cell cycle arrest, monocytic differentiation and apoptosis. Thus, the neuronal transcription factor HMX3 is a leukemia-specific vulnerability in KMT2A::MLLT3 AML.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142763191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Efficacy and safety in a 4-year follow-up of the ELEVATE-TN study comparing acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia. 纠正:在一项4年随访的ELEVATE-TN研究中,比较阿卡拉布替尼加或不加obinutuzumab与obinutuzumab加氯霉素治疗treatment-naïve慢性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效和安全性。
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02487-1
Jeff P Sharman, Miklos Egyed, Wojciech Jurczak, Alan Skarbnik, John M Pagel, Ian W Flinn, Manali Kamdar, Talha Munir, Renata Walewska, Gillian Corbett, Laura Maria Fogliatto, Yair Herishanu, Versha Banerji, Steven Coutre, George Follows, Patricia Walker, Karin Karlsson, Paolo Ghia, Ann Janssens, Florence Cymbalista, Jennifer A Woyach, Emmanuelle Ferrant, William G Wierda, Veerendra Munugalavadla, Ting Yu, Min Hui Wang, John C Byrd
{"title":"Correction: Efficacy and safety in a 4-year follow-up of the ELEVATE-TN study comparing acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia.","authors":"Jeff P Sharman, Miklos Egyed, Wojciech Jurczak, Alan Skarbnik, John M Pagel, Ian W Flinn, Manali Kamdar, Talha Munir, Renata Walewska, Gillian Corbett, Laura Maria Fogliatto, Yair Herishanu, Versha Banerji, Steven Coutre, George Follows, Patricia Walker, Karin Karlsson, Paolo Ghia, Ann Janssens, Florence Cymbalista, Jennifer A Woyach, Emmanuelle Ferrant, William G Wierda, Veerendra Munugalavadla, Ting Yu, Min Hui Wang, John C Byrd","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02487-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02487-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Infection-related pathway activation and vulnerability to arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia with TTMV::RARA. 急性早幼粒细胞白血病TTMV::RARA感染相关通路激活及对三氧化二砷的易感性
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02481-7
Jiacheng Lou, Yi Zhang, Jingfen Tao, Wen Jin, Yongmei Zhu, Zhuo Wang, Min Wu, Hongmei Yi, Xiaoxiao Chen, Shuhong Shen, Junmin Li, Zhu Chen, Saijuan Chen, Yangyang Xie, Li Chen, Kankan Wang
{"title":"Infection-related pathway activation and vulnerability to arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia with TTMV::RARA.","authors":"Jiacheng Lou, Yi Zhang, Jingfen Tao, Wen Jin, Yongmei Zhu, Zhuo Wang, Min Wu, Hongmei Yi, Xiaoxiao Chen, Shuhong Shen, Junmin Li, Zhu Chen, Saijuan Chen, Yangyang Xie, Li Chen, Kankan Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02481-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02481-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142751321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial transcriptomic approaches for characterising the bone marrow landscape: pitfalls and potential. 表征骨髓景观的空间转录组学方法:陷阱和潜力。
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02480-8
Rosalin A Cooper, Emily Thomas, Anna M Sozanska, Carlo Pescia, Daniel J Royston
{"title":"Spatial transcriptomic approaches for characterising the bone marrow landscape: pitfalls and potential.","authors":"Rosalin A Cooper, Emily Thomas, Anna M Sozanska, Carlo Pescia, Daniel J Royston","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02480-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02480-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142751322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relevance of blast counts for genetic subclassification in MDS 爆炸计数与 MDS 基因亚分类的相关性
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02484-4
Sandra Huber, Torsten Haferlach, Stephan Hutter, Gregor Hoermann, Wolfgang Kern, Claudia Haferlach
{"title":"Relevance of blast counts for genetic subclassification in MDS","authors":"Sandra Huber,&nbsp;Torsten Haferlach,&nbsp;Stephan Hutter,&nbsp;Gregor Hoermann,&nbsp;Wolfgang Kern,&nbsp;Claudia Haferlach","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02484-4","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41375-024-02484-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"39 1","pages":"271-273"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02484-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142718401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Leukemia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1