首页 > 最新文献

Midwifery最新文献

英文 中文
Barriers and facilitators to pelvic floor muscle exercises among postpartum women: A meta-synthesis based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) model 产后妇女盆底肌锻炼的障碍和促进因素:基于能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)模型的综合研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104695
Zhouli Gui , Yingni Liang , Yiqin Huang , Qingyan Gu , Qian Li , Xixian Li , Ruotong Liu , Li OuYang , Hongwu Liao

Background

While pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) are recognized for preventing and treating pelvic floor dysfunction, optimal clinical implementation models remain unclear, and factors influencing postpartum adherence are incompletely understood.

Objective

This systematic review evaluated barriers and enablers to PFME adherence from the perspective of postpartum women, to inform behavioural change strategies.

Methods

Nine databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP) were searched from inception to July 1, 2025. Eligible studies included qualitative and mixed-methods designs reporting qualitatively extractable data on barriers/enablers to postpartum PFME. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment Criteria. Thematic analysis mapped findings to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) model.

Results

After screening 968 abstracts and 134 full texts, 9 studies were included (8 qualitative studies and 1 mixed-methods study). The research identified barriers and facilitators related to the following domains:physical capacity (e.g.pre-pregnancy exercise foundation and childbirth trauma and pain), psychological capacity (e.g.lack of knowledge about pelvic floor health, intergenerational misperceptions, and sexual stigma hindering communication), physical opportunity (e.g.time constraints, and digital tool empowerment), social opportunities (e.g.quality of healthcare services and family support networks), reflective motivation (e.g.risk perception-driven, immediate feedback reinforcement, uncertainty about exercise effectiveness), and automatic motivation (e.g.convenience of exercise behaviour, boredom during the process, body image needs, and external care and encouragement).

Conclusion

The study findings identified key factors influencing postpartum women's engagement in pelvic floor muscle exercises and proposed several intervention strategies. Given the paucity of existing qualitative studies on this topic, additional research is warranted to further elucidate the complex, interacting factors that affect postpartum women's adherence to pelvic floor muscle training regimens.
背景:虽然盆底肌运动(PFME)被认为可以预防和治疗盆底功能障碍,但最佳的临床实施模式尚不清楚,影响产后依从性的因素也不完全清楚。目的:本系统综述从产后妇女的角度评估PFME依从性的障碍和促进因素,为行为改变策略提供信息。方法:检索从建库至2025年7月1日的9个数据库(CINAHL、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、SinoMed、CNKI、万方、VIP)。合格的研究包括定性和混合方法设计,报告了产后PFME障碍/促进因素的定性可提取数据。研究质量采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所定性评估标准进行评估。专题分析将结果映射到能力,机会,动机-行为(COM-B)模型。结果:筛选968篇摘要和134篇全文后,纳入9项研究(8项定性研究和1项混合方法研究)。研究确定了与以下领域相关的障碍和促进因素:身体能力(如孕前锻炼基础和分娩创伤和疼痛)、心理能力(如缺乏对盆底健康的了解、代际误解和阻碍沟通的性耻辱)、身体机会(如时间限制和数字工具授权)、社会机会(如医疗服务质量和家庭支持网络)、反思动机(如风险感知驱动、即时反馈强化、运动效果的不确定性)和自动动机(如运动行为的便利性、过程中的无聊感、身体形象需求、外部关怀和鼓励)。结论:本研究发现了影响产后妇女参与盆底肌运动的关键因素,并提出了一些干预策略。鉴于现有关于这一主题的定性研究的缺乏,需要进一步的研究来进一步阐明影响产后妇女坚持盆底肌肉训练方案的复杂的、相互作用的因素。
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to pelvic floor muscle exercises among postpartum women: A meta-synthesis based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) model","authors":"Zhouli Gui ,&nbsp;Yingni Liang ,&nbsp;Yiqin Huang ,&nbsp;Qingyan Gu ,&nbsp;Qian Li ,&nbsp;Xixian Li ,&nbsp;Ruotong Liu ,&nbsp;Li OuYang ,&nbsp;Hongwu Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104695","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104695","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) are recognized for preventing and treating pelvic floor dysfunction, optimal clinical implementation models remain unclear, and factors influencing postpartum adherence are incompletely understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review evaluated barriers and enablers to PFME adherence from the perspective of postpartum women, to inform behavioural change strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP) were searched from inception to July 1, 2025. Eligible studies included qualitative and mixed-methods designs reporting qualitatively extractable data on barriers/enablers to postpartum PFME. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment Criteria. Thematic analysis mapped findings to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening 968 abstracts and 134 full texts, 9 studies were included (8 qualitative studies and 1 mixed-methods study). The research identified barriers and facilitators related to the following domains:physical capacity (e.g.pre-pregnancy exercise foundation and childbirth trauma and pain), psychological capacity (e.g.lack of knowledge about pelvic floor health, intergenerational misperceptions, and sexual stigma hindering communication), physical opportunity (e.g.time constraints, and digital tool empowerment), social opportunities (e.g.quality of healthcare services and family support networks), reflective motivation (e.g.risk perception-driven, immediate feedback reinforcement, uncertainty about exercise effectiveness), and automatic motivation (e.g.convenience of exercise behaviour, boredom during the process, body image needs, and external care and encouragement).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study findings identified key factors influencing postpartum women's engagement in pelvic floor muscle exercises and proposed several intervention strategies. Given the paucity of existing qualitative studies on this topic, additional research is warranted to further elucidate the complex, interacting factors that affect postpartum women's adherence to pelvic floor muscle training regimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145804972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Women’s experiences of pain relief and easing intensity through vocalisations during childbirth: A qualitative study 妇女在分娩过程中通过发声缓解疼痛和缓解强度的经验:一项定性研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104690
Laura A. Zinsser , Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen

Background

Childbirth pain is an individual and diverse experience; it differs from other pain as it is productive and purposeful. Some women do like to give birth without pharmacological pain relief. These women use diverse coping strategies and tools. One tool is vocalisations like vocal-toning, to master childbirth.

Aim

To explore, explain and interpret women’s experience with vocalisations to master the intensity and pain during childbirth.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 women postpartum. These women had a physiological birth free from pharmacological pain relief and vocalised. Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results

Four themes emerged: ‘Changing the pain experience through sound’, outlines the ease of pain during vocal-toning. ‘Balancing internal birthing intensity by using sound’, describes the experienced relief of internal pressure and intensity through vocalisations. ‘Experiencing tricky moments while vocal-toning’, provides detailed insights in moments when the pain can rise, by taking a breath or losing the ‘right’ tone. ‘Mastering the childbirth process with sound as an essential element: "the number one means of coping with pain"’ portrays the experienced meaningfulness of sound work for childbirth.

Conclusion

Vocalisations eased the intensity and pain or made it more bearable for the participants. It were combined with other coping strategies and tools, but vocalisations were essential for nearly all participants to master childbirth. Midwives and other birth companions can support women in finding the ‘right’ tone through joined vocal-toning, indicating a deeper sound.
背景:分娩疼痛是一种个体的、多样的经历;它不同于其他痛苦,因为它是富有成效的和有目的的。有些妇女确实喜欢在没有药物止痛的情况下分娩。这些女性使用不同的应对策略和工具。一种工具是发声,比如音调,来掌握分娩。目的:探讨、解释和解读女性在分娩过程中通过发声来掌握分娩的强度和疼痛。方法:对18名产后妇女进行深度访谈。这些妇女有一个生理分娩,没有药物疼痛缓解和发声。使用Braun和Clarke的反身性主位分析来分析数据。结果:出现了四个主题:“通过声音改变疼痛体验”,概述了在发声过程中疼痛的缓解程度。“通过声音来平衡内部分娩强度”,描述了通过发声来缓解内部压力和强度。“体验调音时的棘手时刻”,在疼痛加剧的时刻,通过呼吸或失去“正确”的音调,提供了详细的见解。“以声音为基本要素掌握分娩过程:“应对疼痛的第一手段””描绘了声音工作对分娩的体验意义。结论:发声减轻了强度和疼痛或使参与者更容易忍受。它与其他应对策略和工具相结合,但发声对几乎所有参与者掌握分娩至关重要。助产士和其他产伴可以帮助女性找到“正确”的音调,通过联合发声音调,表明声音更低沉。
{"title":"Women’s experiences of pain relief and easing intensity through vocalisations during childbirth: A qualitative study","authors":"Laura A. Zinsser ,&nbsp;Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104690","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104690","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Childbirth pain is an individual and diverse experience; it differs from other pain as it is productive and purposeful. Some women do like to give birth without pharmacological pain relief. These women use diverse coping strategies and tools. One tool is vocalisations like vocal-toning, to master childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore, explain and interpret women’s experience with vocalisations to master the intensity and pain during childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 women postpartum. These women had a physiological birth free from pharmacological pain relief and vocalised. Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used to analyse the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged: ‘<em>Changing the pain experience through sound’</em>, outlines the ease of pain during vocal-toning. <em>‘Balancing internal birthing intensity by using sound’</em>, describes the experienced relief of internal pressure and intensity through vocalisations. <em>‘Experiencing tricky moments while vocal-toning’</em>, provides detailed insights in moments when the pain can rise, by taking a breath or losing the ‘right’ tone. ‘<em>Mastering the childbirth process with sound as an essential element: \"the number one means of coping with pain\"’</em> portrays the experienced meaningfulness of sound work for childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Vocalisations eased the intensity and pain or made it more bearable for the participants. It were combined with other coping strategies and tools, but vocalisations were essential for nearly all participants to master childbirth. Midwives and other birth companions can support women in finding the ‘right’ tone through joined vocal-toning, indicating a deeper sound.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinct dyadic coping patterns in couples managing gestational diabetes mellitus: a latent profile analysis 不同的二元应对模式的夫妇管理妊娠糖尿病:一个潜在的概况分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104692
Qian Xu , Rong-rong Han , Lei Zeng , Ke Sun , Pei-pei Luo , Juan-juan Zhao , Ling-ling Gao

Problem

No studies have identified dyadic coping patterns in couples managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Background

While male partners are often involved in GDM management, their involvement exerts mixed effects.

Aim

This study aims to (1) identify dyadic coping patterns among GDM couples, (2) compare self-management behaviors among identified patterns, and (3) examine potential predictors associated with each pattern.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, from September 2024 to January 2025. 200 GDM couples completed the Chinese version of the Couple Collaborative Management Scale and the GDM Knowledge Questionnaire. Pregnant women also completed the GDM Self-management Behavior Scale. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups of dyadic coping.

Findings

Three latent patterns emerged: Class 1 (low-positive/low-negative group; 20.0%), Class 2 (high-positive/high-negative group; 12.0%), and Class 3 (high-positive/low-negative group; 68.0%). Significant differences in self-management behaviors were observed across classes. History of adverse obstetric outcomes, paternal GDM knowledge, and maternal dyadic appraisal were significant predictors of class membership.

Discussion

The findings provide healthcare professionals with a deeper understanding of couple interactions in GDM management and how these interactions function within this context.

Conclusion

Approximately one-third of couples exhibited suboptimal dyadic coping patterns. To optimize GDM management, healthcare professionals are recommended to routinely screen couples for maladaptive patterns and implement tailored dyadic interventions to facilitate more functional couple interactions.
问题:目前还没有研究确定妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)夫妻的二元应对模式。背景:虽然男性伴侣经常参与GDM的管理,但他们的参与产生了混合效应。目的:本研究旨在(1)识别GDM夫妇的二元应对模式,(2)比较识别模式之间的自我管理行为,(3)研究每种模式相关的潜在预测因素。方法:于2024年9月至2025年1月在中国广州进行横断面研究。200对GDM夫妻完成了中文版的《夫妻协同管理量表》和《GDM知识问卷》。孕妇还完成了GDM自我管理行为量表。潜在剖面分析用于识别二元应对的亚群。结果:出现了3种潜在模式:1类(低阳性/低阴性组;20.0%)、2类(高阳性/高阴性组;12.0%)和3类(高阳性/低阴性组;68.0%)。不同班级的自我管理行为存在显著差异。不良产科结局史、父亲GDM知识和母亲二元评价是班级成员的重要预测因素。讨论:研究结果使医疗保健专业人员更深入地了解GDM管理中的夫妻相互作用以及这些相互作用在这种情况下如何发挥作用。结论:约三分之一的夫妻表现出次优的二元应对模式。为了优化GDM管理,建议医疗保健专业人员定期筛查夫妻的不适应模式,并实施量身定制的二元干预措施,以促进更有效的夫妻互动。
{"title":"Distinct dyadic coping patterns in couples managing gestational diabetes mellitus: a latent profile analysis","authors":"Qian Xu ,&nbsp;Rong-rong Han ,&nbsp;Lei Zeng ,&nbsp;Ke Sun ,&nbsp;Pei-pei Luo ,&nbsp;Juan-juan Zhao ,&nbsp;Ling-ling Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104692","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>No studies have identified dyadic coping patterns in couples managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>While male partners are often involved in GDM management, their involvement exerts mixed effects.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to (1) identify dyadic coping patterns among GDM couples, (2) compare self-management behaviors among identified patterns, and (3) examine potential predictors associated with each pattern.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, from September 2024 to January 2025. 200 GDM couples completed the Chinese version of the Couple Collaborative Management Scale and the GDM Knowledge Questionnaire. Pregnant women also completed the GDM Self-management Behavior Scale. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups of dyadic coping.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Three latent patterns emerged: Class 1 (low-positive/low-negative group; 20.0%), Class 2 (high-positive/high-negative group; 12.0%), and Class 3 (high-positive/low-negative group; 68.0%). Significant differences in self-management behaviors were observed across classes. History of adverse obstetric outcomes, paternal GDM knowledge, and maternal dyadic appraisal were significant predictors of class membership.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings provide healthcare professionals with a deeper understanding of couple interactions in GDM management and how these interactions function within this context.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Approximately one-third of couples exhibited suboptimal dyadic coping patterns. To optimize GDM management, healthcare professionals are recommended to routinely screen couples for maladaptive patterns and implement tailored dyadic interventions to facilitate more functional couple interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145781314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal and neonatal waterbirth outcomes in a Brazilian freestanding birth centre: a cross-sectional study 巴西独立分娩中心的产妇和新生儿水分娩结局:一项横断面研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104691
Pamela Vicente Nakazone , Nathalie Leister , Thaís Trevisan Teixeira , Carla Marins Silva , Christine McCourt , Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco
Problem and Background: While international studies support the safety and benefits of waterbirth, this practice is still restricted in many Brazilian services, with few opportunities for birthing people to choose this option for labour and birth. Aim: To analyse maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted waterbirths versus land births in a Brazilian freestanding birth centre. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using retrospective data from 2012 to 2024. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of 919 waterbirths were compared to 2,805 land births, including perineal tear and repair, postpartum haemorrhage, retained placenta, maternal and neonatal transfers, neonatal resuscitation, and Apgar scores. Odds ratios (OR), rate ratios (RR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated, and multivariate analysis considered previous vaginal birth as a confounder variable. The significance level was 5 %. Findings: Waterbirth was associated with a lower likelihood of perineal tear (aOR, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.65-0.87; P < .001), perineal repair (OR, 0.73; 95 % CI, 0.62-0.86; P < .001) and postpartum haemorrhage (aOR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.64-0.90; P < .002). Discussion: The findings align with international evidence that associates waterbirth with reduced perineal trauma and postpartum haemorrhage. Unlike some studies that suggest increased neonatal risks, no adverse outcomes were observed in this study. Conclusion: Waterbirth was not associated with any additional risk to people with straightforward pregnancies. The results support the option of waterbirth as an informed choice for this population birthing in freestanding birth centres.
问题和背景:虽然国际研究支持水中分娩的安全性和益处,但这种做法在巴西的许多服务中仍然受到限制,产妇很少有机会选择这种分娩和分娩方式。目的:分析巴西独立分娩中心辅助水中分娩与陆地分娩的孕产妇和新生儿结局。方法:采用2012 - 2024年的回顾性数据进行横断面研究。将919例水中分娩的产妇和新生儿结局与2805例陆地分娩的产妇和新生儿结局进行比较,包括会阴撕裂和修复、产后出血、胎盘残留、产妇和新生儿转移、新生儿复苏和Apgar评分。计算优势比(OR)、比率比(RR)和调整优势比(aOR),多因素分析将既往阴道分娩作为混杂变量。显著性水平为5%。结果:水中分娩与会阴撕裂(aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.87; P < 0.001)、会阴修复(OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86; P < 0.001)和产后出血(aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < 002)的可能性较低相关。讨论:研究结果与国际上有关水分娩与减少会阴创伤和产后出血的证据一致。与一些提示新生儿风险增加的研究不同,本研究未观察到不良后果。结论:对直接怀孕的人来说,水中分娩与任何额外的风险无关。研究结果支持将水中分娩作为在独立分娩中心分娩的明智选择。
{"title":"Maternal and neonatal waterbirth outcomes in a Brazilian freestanding birth centre: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Pamela Vicente Nakazone ,&nbsp;Nathalie Leister ,&nbsp;Thaís Trevisan Teixeira ,&nbsp;Carla Marins Silva ,&nbsp;Christine McCourt ,&nbsp;Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104691","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Problem and Background: While international studies support the safety and benefits of waterbirth, this practice is still restricted in many Brazilian services, with few opportunities for birthing people to choose this option for labour and birth. Aim: To analyse maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted waterbirths versus land births in a Brazilian freestanding birth centre. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using retrospective data from 2012 to 2024. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of 919 waterbirths were compared to 2,805 land births, including perineal tear and repair, postpartum haemorrhage, retained placenta, maternal and neonatal transfers, neonatal resuscitation, and Apgar scores. Odds ratios (OR), rate ratios (RR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated, and multivariate analysis considered previous vaginal birth as a confounder variable. The significance level was 5 %. Findings: Waterbirth was associated with a lower likelihood of perineal tear (aOR, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.65-0.87; P &lt; .001), perineal repair (OR, 0.73; 95 % CI, 0.62-0.86; P &lt; .001) and postpartum haemorrhage (aOR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.64-0.90; P &lt; .002). <em>Discussion:</em> The findings align with international evidence that associates waterbirth with reduced perineal trauma and postpartum haemorrhage. Unlike some studies that suggest increased neonatal risks, no adverse outcomes were observed in this study. Conclusion: Waterbirth was not associated with any additional risk to people with straightforward pregnancies. The results support the option of waterbirth as an informed choice for this population birthing in freestanding birth centres.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the use of peer support by midwives in clinical practice: A scoping review 了解助产士在临床实践中同伴支持的使用:范围审查。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104686
Linda Sweet , Gina Kruger

Problem

Midwifery work is both challenging and rewarding. Midwifery is emotionally demanding, and peer support is thought to help midwives process distressing experiences such as traumatic births, perinatal loss, or professional conflict. Whilst there is evidence of preceptorship, mentoring, and clinical supervision in midwifery, the ways in which midwives give and receive peer support are not well understood.

Aim

To examine the evidence regarding the use of peer support by midwives and to map the evidence, focusing on knowledge gaps, to inform further research on how to best support midwives.

Methods

A scoping review was undertaken through four databases that index midwifery-related research. Peer-reviewed papers in English were sourced. Two midwifery researchers independently screened all titles and abstracts, then selected full texts. This was undertaken in Covidence. A thematic synthesis was undertaken in the selected papers.

Findings

Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. The acronym ‘Strive’ was developed to represent the key concepts of peer support for midwives, including Setting (context), Trauma, Relationships, Institutional support, Validation (emotional support), and Engagement (team/managerial).

Discussion

‘STRIVE’ conveys an active, aspirational tone when the workplace setting or context is recognised, trauma may be minimised, positive relationships with the inter and intra professional team are built, institutional policies and practices support midwives, experiences perceived as stressful are validated through emotional support within the team, and the team and management are engaged in creating the positive environment and building social capital. Peer support may be enhanced if midwives are provided with education on mental health and well-being in the workplace.

Conclusion

Positive peer support is a necessity, not an indulgence, if we are to build a strong, resilient workforce and retain the midwifery workforce.
问题:助产工作既有挑战性又有回报。助产在情感上是需要的,同伴的支持被认为可以帮助助产士处理痛苦的经历,如创伤性分娩、围产期损失或职业冲突。虽然有证据表明助产士中存在指导、指导和临床监督,但助产士给予和接受同伴支持的方式尚未得到很好的理解。目的:检查关于助产士使用同伴支持的证据,并绘制证据图,重点关注知识差距,为如何最好地支持助产士的进一步研究提供信息。方法:通过四个索引助产相关研究的数据库进行范围审查。同行评议的英文论文的来源。两位助产学研究人员独立筛选所有标题和摘要,然后选择全文。这是在冠状病毒病期间开展的。对选定的文件进行了专题综合。结果:30篇文章符合纳入标准。首字母缩略词“力求”是为了代表助产士同伴支持的关键概念,包括环境(背景)、创伤、关系、机构支持、验证(情感支持)和参与(团队/管理)。讨论:当工作场所环境或背景得到认可时,“努力”传达了一种积极的、有抱负的基调,创伤可能被最小化,与专业团队之间和内部建立了积极的关系,制度政策和实践支持助产士,通过团队内部的情感支持来验证被认为有压力的经历,团队和管理层参与创造积极的环境和建立社会资本。如果向助产士提供有关工作场所心理健康和福祉的教育,则可以加强同伴支持。结论:如果我们要建立一支强大的、有弹性的劳动力队伍,并留住助产士队伍,积极的同伴支持是必要的,而不是放纵。
{"title":"Understanding the use of peer support by midwives in clinical practice: A scoping review","authors":"Linda Sweet ,&nbsp;Gina Kruger","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104686","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104686","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Midwifery work is both challenging and rewarding. Midwifery is emotionally demanding, and peer support is thought to help midwives process distressing experiences such as traumatic births, perinatal loss, or professional conflict. Whilst there is evidence of preceptorship, mentoring, and clinical supervision in midwifery, the ways in which midwives give and receive peer support are not well understood.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine the evidence regarding the use of peer support by midwives and to map the evidence, focusing on knowledge gaps, to inform further research on how to best support midwives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was undertaken through four databases that index midwifery-related research. Peer-reviewed papers in English were sourced. Two midwifery researchers independently screened all titles and abstracts, then selected full texts. This was undertaken in Covidence. A thematic synthesis was undertaken in the selected papers.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. The acronym ‘Strive’ was developed to represent the key concepts of peer support for midwives, including Setting (context), Trauma, Relationships, Institutional support, Validation (emotional support), and Engagement (team/managerial).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>‘STRIVE’ conveys an active, aspirational tone when the workplace setting or context is recognised, trauma may be minimised, positive relationships with the inter and intra professional team are built, institutional policies and practices support midwives, experiences perceived as stressful are validated through emotional support within the team, and the team and management are engaged in creating the positive environment and building social capital. Peer support may be enhanced if midwives are provided with education on mental health and well-being in the workplace.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Positive peer support is a necessity, not an indulgence, if we are to build a strong, resilient workforce and retain the midwifery workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advanced intrapartum midwifery practice: a scoping review 高级产内助产实践:范围审查
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104687
Grazia Martano , Elisa Ambrosi , Stefania Poggianella , Claudia Paoli

Problem

There is no international consensus on advanced midwifery practice in intrapartum care.

Background

Evidence suggests that advanced practice midwives improve maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes, access to care, resource efficiency and staff satisfaction. However, specific literature on advanced midwifery skills in intrapartum care is lacking.

Aim

To map advanced midwifery skills in intrapartum care.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google from inception to April 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Findings

A systematic search of the literature identified 6932 studies, and 17 met inclusion criteria. The advanced intrapartum skills identified relate to perineal care, instrumental vaginal birth, breech vaginal birth, perineal repair, cesarean section, emergencies procedures, intrapartum ultrasound, counseling and mediation, labour techniques, advanced clinical assessment, intangible skills, external cephalic version.

Discussion

Two main trends emerge: the skills practiced in midwifery-led units are oriented to promote and respect the physiology of childbirth and, in more under-resourced contexts, the development of midwifery follows an overlapping path with that of medical skills. The advancement of intrapartum practice involves the exercise of technological and emotional skills. The practice of counseling skills contributes to the professional development of the whole team.

Conclusion

This review suggests the need to develop advanced skills in the area of birth physiology through the promotion of organisational models such as midwifery-led units. It is important to focus on how advanced profiles can be implemented and how advancement in practice affects maternal and neonatal outcomes.
问题产中护理的先进助产实践尚无国际共识。背景:有证据表明,高级执业助产士可以改善孕产妇和新生儿的临床结果、获得护理的机会、资源效率和工作人员满意度。然而,在产中护理的高级助产技术的具体文献是缺乏的。目的了解产中护理的先进助产技术。方法采用Medline、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、谷歌等电子数据库,按照系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展,从成立至2022年4月进行范围评价。系统检索了6932项研究,其中17项符合纳入标准。所确定的先进产时技能涉及会阴护理、器械阴道分娩、臀位阴道分娩、会阴修复、剖宫产、紧急程序、产时超声、咨询和调解、分娩技术、先进临床评估、无形技能、外部头侧版本。讨论出现了两个主要趋势:在助产士领导的单位中,实践的技能以促进和尊重分娩生理学为导向;在资源更不足的情况下,助产士的发展遵循与医疗技能重叠的道路。产中实践的进步涉及技术和情感技能的锻炼。咨询技巧的实践有助于整个团队的专业发展。结论本综述建议需要通过推广助产士领导单位等组织模式来发展生育生理学领域的高级技能。重要的是要关注如何实施先进的概况,以及实践的进步如何影响孕产妇和新生儿的结局。
{"title":"Advanced intrapartum midwifery practice: a scoping review","authors":"Grazia Martano ,&nbsp;Elisa Ambrosi ,&nbsp;Stefania Poggianella ,&nbsp;Claudia Paoli","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>There is no international consensus on advanced midwifery practice in intrapartum care.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence suggests that advanced practice midwives improve maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes, access to care, resource efficiency and staff satisfaction. However, specific literature on advanced midwifery skills in intrapartum care is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To map advanced midwifery skills in intrapartum care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google from inception to April 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A systematic search of the literature identified 6932 studies, and 17 met inclusion criteria. The advanced intrapartum skills identified relate to perineal care, instrumental vaginal birth, breech vaginal birth, perineal repair, cesarean section, emergencies procedures, intrapartum ultrasound, counseling and mediation, labour techniques, advanced clinical assessment, intangible skills, external cephalic version.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Two main trends emerge: the skills practiced in midwifery-led units are oriented to promote and respect the physiology of childbirth and, in more under-resourced contexts, the development of midwifery follows an overlapping path with that of medical skills. The advancement of intrapartum practice involves the exercise of technological and emotional skills. The practice of counseling skills contributes to the professional development of the whole team.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review suggests the need to develop advanced skills in the area of birth physiology through the promotion of organisational models such as midwifery-led units. It is important to focus on how advanced profiles can be implemented and how advancement in practice affects maternal and neonatal outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving person-centred maternity care in Sri Lanka through co-creation: Utilising women's perceptions and stakeholder opinions 通过共同创造改善斯里兰卡以人为本的产妇护理:利用妇女的看法和利益相关者的意见
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104689
Mohamed Rishard , Aysha Fathima Ziyad Mohamed , Ashwini De Abrew , Hemantha Senanayake , Millawage Supun Dilara Wijesinghe , Marzia Lazzerini
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>There is a lack of studies documenting the utilisation of different views of person-centred maternity care (PCMC), such as maternal perceptions, views of health professionals, and women’s advocates, to co-create interventions to improve the quality of care (QoC) in Sri Lanka.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted at a referral maternity care centre in Colombo. It involved 87 stakeholders in four phases. We conducted the study in phases to optimize logistics and feasibility. Therefore, it was conducted in a phase wise manner. Phase I: Perceptions of PCMC among 39 mothers who delivered vaginally were explored through focus group discussions (FGDs). Phase II: Delphi rounds with 25 healthcare providers were conducted to identify and prioritise interventions. Phase III: Intervention priorities were revised based on feedback from a group of 23 women’s advocacy group (WAG), using the Nominal Group Technique. Phase IV: the Nominal Group Technique was utilised to obtain the views and consensus of the women included in Phase I.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phase I revealed five key topics:1) care and attention; 2) companions in labour; 3) respect, dignity, privacy, and communication; 4) awareness of autonomy; and 5) general safety and cleanliness. In Phase II, ten possible interventions to improve PCMC were identified, with improving staff communication skills and empowering women on their rights being the highest priorities. In Phase III, the WAG revised the priority list, with the top priorities being improving infrastructure and the organisation of care and appointing more staff. In Phase IV, the majority (94 %) of the women agreed that the proposed prioritised interventions would improve maternal healthcare services.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study revealed gaps in PCMC but demonstrated that in a setting like Sri Lanka, views of service users, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups can be successfully used to co-create context-specific interventions for improving QoC. We recommend further implementation research to obtain data on the feasibility, sustainability, and challenges of the identified interventions.</div></div><div><h3>What is already known on this topic</h3><div>There is limited evidence documenting the utilisation of different views in improving person-centred maternity care in LMIC.</div></div><div><h3>What this study adds</h3><div>A participatory approach involving care seekers, WAG representing the public, and healthcare providers was useful in co-creating a list of prioritised interventions to improve the quality of maternity care services in a low-resource setting.</div></div><div><h3>How this study might affect research, practice, or policy</h3><div>The findings highlight the importance of further exploration and engagement with local stakeholders, including healthcare users, providers, and advocacy groups, to co-create context-specific interventions t
在斯里兰卡,缺乏记录以人为本的产妇护理(PCMC)的不同观点的研究,如产妇的看法、卫生专业人员的观点和妇女倡导者的观点,以共同制定干预措施以提高护理质量(QoC)。方法本研究在科伦坡的一家转诊产科护理中心进行。它分四个阶段涉及87个利益相关者。我们分阶段进行研究,以优化物流和可行性。因此,它是以明智的方式进行的。第一阶段:通过焦点小组讨论(fgd)探讨39名顺产母亲对PCMC的看法。第二阶段:与25个医疗保健提供者进行德尔菲轮次,以确定和优先考虑干预措施。第三阶段:根据由23个妇女倡导小组(WAG)组成的小组的反馈,使用名义小组技术,对干预重点进行了修订。第四阶段:使用名义小组技术来获得第一阶段妇女的观点和共识。结果第一阶段揭示了五个关键主题:1)照顾和关注;2)劳动伙伴;3)尊重、尊严、隐私和交流;4)自主意识;5)总体安全和清洁。在第二阶段,确定了改善PCMC的十项可能的干预措施,其中提高工作人员的沟通技巧和赋予妇女权利是最高优先事项。在第三阶段,WAG修订了优先事项清单,其中最优先事项是改善基础设施和护理组织,并任命更多的工作人员。在第四阶段,大多数(94%)妇女同意,拟议的优先干预措施将改善孕产妇保健服务。结论:本研究揭示了PCMC的差距,但表明在斯里兰卡这样的环境中,服务使用者、医疗保健提供者和倡导团体的观点可以成功地用于共同创建针对具体情况的干预措施,以改善QoC。我们建议进一步开展实施研究,以获取有关已确定干预措施的可行性、可持续性和挑战的数据。关于这个主题已经知道的是,在低收入和中等收入国家,利用不同的观点来改善以人为本的产妇护理的证据有限。本研究补充的是,一种涉及寻求护理者、代表公众的WAG和医疗保健提供者的参与式方法,有助于共同制定优先干预措施清单,以提高资源匮乏环境下产妇护理服务的质量。本研究如何影响研究、实践或政策。研究结果强调了进一步探索和与当地利益相关者(包括医疗保健用户、提供者和倡导团体)合作的重要性,以共同创建针对具体情况的干预措施来改善PCMC。本研究的方法可以作为在类似环境中识别和优先考虑此类干预措施的模型。
{"title":"Improving person-centred maternity care in Sri Lanka through co-creation: Utilising women's perceptions and stakeholder opinions","authors":"Mohamed Rishard ,&nbsp;Aysha Fathima Ziyad Mohamed ,&nbsp;Ashwini De Abrew ,&nbsp;Hemantha Senanayake ,&nbsp;Millawage Supun Dilara Wijesinghe ,&nbsp;Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104689","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104689","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;There is a lack of studies documenting the utilisation of different views of person-centred maternity care (PCMC), such as maternal perceptions, views of health professionals, and women’s advocates, to co-create interventions to improve the quality of care (QoC) in Sri Lanka.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The study was conducted at a referral maternity care centre in Colombo. It involved 87 stakeholders in four phases. We conducted the study in phases to optimize logistics and feasibility. Therefore, it was conducted in a phase wise manner. Phase I: Perceptions of PCMC among 39 mothers who delivered vaginally were explored through focus group discussions (FGDs). Phase II: Delphi rounds with 25 healthcare providers were conducted to identify and prioritise interventions. Phase III: Intervention priorities were revised based on feedback from a group of 23 women’s advocacy group (WAG), using the Nominal Group Technique. Phase IV: the Nominal Group Technique was utilised to obtain the views and consensus of the women included in Phase I.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Phase I revealed five key topics:1) care and attention; 2) companions in labour; 3) respect, dignity, privacy, and communication; 4) awareness of autonomy; and 5) general safety and cleanliness. In Phase II, ten possible interventions to improve PCMC were identified, with improving staff communication skills and empowering women on their rights being the highest priorities. In Phase III, the WAG revised the priority list, with the top priorities being improving infrastructure and the organisation of care and appointing more staff. In Phase IV, the majority (94 %) of the women agreed that the proposed prioritised interventions would improve maternal healthcare services.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study revealed gaps in PCMC but demonstrated that in a setting like Sri Lanka, views of service users, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups can be successfully used to co-create context-specific interventions for improving QoC. We recommend further implementation research to obtain data on the feasibility, sustainability, and challenges of the identified interventions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;What is already known on this topic&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;There is limited evidence documenting the utilisation of different views in improving person-centred maternity care in LMIC.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;What this study adds&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A participatory approach involving care seekers, WAG representing the public, and healthcare providers was useful in co-creating a list of prioritised interventions to improve the quality of maternity care services in a low-resource setting.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;How this study might affect research, practice, or policy&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The findings highlight the importance of further exploration and engagement with local stakeholders, including healthcare users, providers, and advocacy groups, to co-create context-specific interventions t","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the barriers UK midwives face in leading research: A critical discussion paper 了解英国助产士在领先研究中面临的障碍:一份关键的讨论文件
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104688
Hannah M Brennan , Christine Furber

Problem

Midwives have a pivotal role in supporting excellence in care through research. However, in the UK, very few midwives lead research. It has been estimated that <0.1 % of clinical midwives are employed in clinical academic careers, where they pursue a joint role working clinically and conducting research, and only 12 % of midwives working in academia hold a PhD.

Background

Increasing midwifery-led research and building research capacity for midwives has long been on the UK national agenda. Due to their experience, midwives can address clinically important questions and research solutions to problems that they have observed in their practice. However, midwives face many barriers to commencing and sustaining a career where they engage in midwife-led research.

Aim

This critical discussion paper aims to explore and understand the factors acting as barriers to UK midwives embarking on and maintaining a career leading research.

Discussion

This paper presents a critical discussion of the barriers for UK-based midwives to pursue research careers based on four main key points. The paper draws from UK-based reports and international contemporary literature. Four key barriers were identified from the literature: Lack of opportunities, awareness and knowledge of research among midwives; Lack of role models and mentorship; Lack of NHS and Approved Education Institution (AEI) organisational support; Lack of a clear pathway of progression.

Conclusion and recommendations

Significant barriers exist for UK midwives to engage in midwife-led research, which must be addressed to enable midwife-led research capacity to be improved and establish a workforce of leading midwifery researchers. Key recommendations have been identified to improve the accessibility of conducting midwife-led research.
助产士在通过研究支持卓越护理方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在英国,很少有助产士领导研究。据估计,0.1%的临床助产士从事临床学术工作,在那里他们从事临床工作并进行研究,只有12%的学术界助产士拥有博士学位。长期以来,增加助产士主导的研究和建立助产士的研究能力一直在英国国家议程上。由于他们的经验,助产士可以解决临床重要的问题和研究解决方案,他们在实践中观察到的问题。然而,助产士在开始和维持从事助产士主导的研究的职业生涯时面临许多障碍。目的:这篇重要的讨论论文旨在探索和理解英国助产士从事和维持职业领先研究的障碍因素。这篇论文基于四个主要的关键点,对英国助产士从事研究职业的障碍进行了批判性的讨论。本文借鉴了英国的报道和国际当代文学。从文献中确定了四个主要障碍:助产士缺乏机会、研究意识和知识;缺乏榜样和指导;缺乏NHS和认可教育机构(AEI)的组织支持;缺乏明确的发展路径。结论和建议英国助产士参与助产士主导的研究存在重大障碍,必须解决这些障碍,以提高助产士主导的研究能力,并建立一支领先的助产士研究队伍。已确定了一些重要建议,以改善进行助产士主导的研究的可及性。
{"title":"Understanding the barriers UK midwives face in leading research: A critical discussion paper","authors":"Hannah M Brennan ,&nbsp;Christine Furber","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104688","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Midwives have a pivotal role in supporting excellence in care through research. However, in the UK, very few midwives lead research. It has been estimated that &lt;0.1 % of clinical midwives are employed in clinical academic careers, where they pursue a joint role working clinically and conducting research, and only 12 % of midwives working in academia hold a PhD.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Increasing midwifery-led research and building research capacity for midwives has long been on the UK national agenda. Due to their experience, midwives can address clinically important questions and research solutions to problems that they have observed in their practice. However, midwives face many barriers to commencing and sustaining a career where they engage in midwife-led research.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This critical discussion paper aims to explore and understand the factors acting as barriers to UK midwives embarking on and maintaining a career leading research.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This paper presents a critical discussion of the barriers for UK-based midwives to pursue research careers based on four main key points. The paper draws from UK-based reports and international contemporary literature. Four key barriers were identified from the literature: Lack of opportunities, awareness and knowledge of research among midwives; Lack of role models and mentorship; Lack of NHS and Approved Education Institution (AEI) organisational support; Lack of a clear pathway of progression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and recommendations</h3><div>Significant barriers exist for UK midwives to engage in midwife-led research, which must be addressed to enable midwife-led research capacity to be improved and establish a workforce of leading midwifery researchers. Key recommendations have been identified to improve the accessibility of conducting midwife-led research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care: An integrative review 首次父亲在围产期初级保健中的纳入和参与:一项综合回顾
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104685
Richard Pascal , Fatch Kalembo , Lesley Kuliukas , Alka Kothari , Garth Kendall , Rikki Priest , Mary Steen

Problem

Research about first-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care is limited.

Background

Globally, fathers’ engagement with perinatal healthcare services is low. First-time fathers experience more distress, have unique support needs and are more willing to engage with perinatal healthcare than experienced fathers. Yet, primary care’s role in supporting perinatal first-time fathers has received little research attention.

Aim

To examine first-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care and the feasibility of engaging them through primary care pathways.

Methods

Integrative review of international peer-reviewed and grey literature.

Findings

Thirty-three studies (16 quantitative, 13 qualitative, 4 mixed-methods) were included, comprising 3712 first-time fathers. Almost half (46 %) of the fathers in 19 suitable studies were first-time fathers. Parents’ perceived barriers to father engagement included providers being mother-focused and fathers’ mistrust of providers. Provider barriers included father absence, perceived father disinterest, workload and low managerial support. Promising strategies for engagement included provider-initiated interactions with fathers and postnatal home visits. Systemic barriers received limited attention.

Discussion

The lack of complete father-specific data in several studies hindered the review process and limited the strength of conclusions. Since first-time fathers may comprise about half of fathers in perinatal primary care, universal services risk overlooking their specific needs. While strategies like postnatal home visits show promise for father engagement, limited consensus about engagement strategies and unaddressed systemic issues may limit their effectiveness.

Conclusion

Further research exploring parents’ and providers’ views is required to guide more effective father-inclusive care. Engaging first-time fathers in primary care must go beyond practical strategies and address deeper systemic issues.
问题关于第一次做父亲的人是否参与围产期初级保健的研究是有限的。在全球范围内,父亲参与围产期保健服务的程度很低。与有经验的父亲相比,初为人父的父亲更痛苦,有独特的支持需求,更愿意参与围产期保健。然而,初级保健在支持围产期首次父亲方面的作用很少受到研究关注。目的研究首次父亲在围产期初级保健中的参与情况,以及通过初级保健途径让他们参与的可行性。方法综合国际同行评议文献和灰色文献。结果共纳入33项研究(定量研究16项,定性研究13项,混合研究4项),共3712例初为人父的父亲。在19项合适的研究中,几乎一半(46%)的父亲是第一次当父亲。父母认为父亲参与的障碍包括提供者以母亲为中心和父亲对提供者的不信任。提供者障碍包括父亲缺席、父亲漠不关心、工作量和低管理支持。有希望的参与策略包括提供者发起的与父亲的互动和产后家访。系统性障碍受到的关注有限。在一些研究中缺乏完整的父亲特异性数据阻碍了审查过程并限制了结论的强度。由于初次生育的父亲可能占围产期初级保健父亲的一半左右,普遍服务可能会忽视他们的具体需求。虽然产后家访等策略显示了父亲参与的希望,但关于参与策略的有限共识和未解决的系统性问题可能会限制其有效性。结论需要进一步研究家长和提供者的观点,以指导更有效的父亲全纳护理。让初为人父的人参与初级保健必须超越实际战略,解决更深层次的系统性问题。
{"title":"First-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care: An integrative review","authors":"Richard Pascal ,&nbsp;Fatch Kalembo ,&nbsp;Lesley Kuliukas ,&nbsp;Alka Kothari ,&nbsp;Garth Kendall ,&nbsp;Rikki Priest ,&nbsp;Mary Steen","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104685","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Research about first-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Globally, fathers’ engagement with perinatal healthcare services is low. First-time fathers experience more distress, have unique support needs and are more willing to engage with perinatal healthcare than experienced fathers. Yet, primary care’s role in supporting perinatal first-time fathers has received little research attention.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine first-time fathers’ inclusion in, and engagement with, perinatal primary care and the feasibility of engaging them through primary care pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Integrative review of international peer-reviewed and grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Thirty-three studies (16 quantitative, 13 qualitative, 4 mixed-methods) were included, comprising 3712 first-time fathers. Almost half (46 %) of the fathers in 19 suitable studies were first-time fathers. Parents’ perceived barriers to father engagement included providers being mother-focused and fathers’ mistrust of providers. Provider barriers included father absence, perceived father disinterest, workload and low managerial support. Promising strategies for engagement included provider-initiated interactions with fathers and postnatal home visits. Systemic barriers received limited attention.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The lack of complete father-specific data in several studies hindered the review process and limited the strength of conclusions. Since first-time fathers may comprise about half of fathers in perinatal primary care, universal services risk overlooking their specific needs. While strategies like postnatal home visits show promise for father engagement, limited consensus about engagement strategies and unaddressed systemic issues may limit their effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Further research exploring parents’ and providers’ views is required to guide more effective father-inclusive care. Engaging first-time fathers in primary care must go beyond practical strategies and address deeper systemic issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a case-control study 妊娠期高血压疾病的危险因素和妊娠结局:一项病例对照研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104684
Qingyan Yu , Lin Xie , Wenhui Xu , Shutong Chen , Xue Chen , Xinhong Jiang , Qi Chu , Haitao Yu

Objectives

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is a group of diseases that coexist with pregnancy and hypertension and it will affect the health of mothers and babies. The primary objective of this study was to identify the relevant factors for HDP and to briefly assess its impact on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

660 pregnant women who gave birth in a hospital of Northeast China were included as the study subjects. The basic information of the pregnant woman was provided via the medical record system. Statistical analyses including logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used.

Results

The prevalence of overweight/obesity, high gestational weight gain (GWG) and diabetes was higher in HDP group (P < 0.05), whereas multiparity and uterine fibroids was lower (P < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis shown that overweight/obesity and high GWG might increase risk of HDP while multiparity and having uterine fibroids might reduce risk of HDP in pregnant women (P < 0.001). The ROC curve indicated that pre-pregnancy BMI demonstrated the highest predictive value for the occurrence of HDP. A comparison of pregnancy outcomes revealed that the caesarean section was higher in HDP group than in CON group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings of this study reaffirmed overweight/obesity and high GWG as risk factors for HDP, while multiparity and uterine fibroids might be protective. HDP was strongly associated with increased caesarean section rates.
目的妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)是妊娠期与高血压共存的一组疾病,严重影响母婴健康。本研究的主要目的是确定HDP的相关因素,并简要评估其对妊娠结局的影响。方法选取东北地区某医院分娩的孕妇660例作为研究对象。孕妇的基本信息通过病案系统提供。统计分析包括logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果HDP组超重/肥胖、高妊娠增重(GWG)、糖尿病患病率较高(P < 0.05),多胎和子宫肌瘤患病率较低(P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示,超重/肥胖和高GWG可能增加HDP的风险,而多胎和子宫肌瘤可能降低妊娠妇女HDP的风险(P < 0.001)。ROC曲线显示,孕前BMI对HDP的发生预测价值最高。妊娠结局比较显示,HDP组剖宫产率高于CON组(P < 0.001)。结论本研究结果重申超重/肥胖和高GWG是HDP的危险因素,而多胎和子宫肌瘤可能具有保护作用。HDP与剖宫产率增加密切相关。
{"title":"Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a case-control study","authors":"Qingyan Yu ,&nbsp;Lin Xie ,&nbsp;Wenhui Xu ,&nbsp;Shutong Chen ,&nbsp;Xue Chen ,&nbsp;Xinhong Jiang ,&nbsp;Qi Chu ,&nbsp;Haitao Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104684","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104684","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is a group of diseases that coexist with pregnancy and hypertension and it will affect the health of mothers and babies. The primary objective of this study was to identify the relevant factors for HDP and to briefly assess its impact on pregnancy outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>660 pregnant women who gave birth in a hospital of Northeast China were included as the study subjects. The basic information of the pregnant woman was provided via the medical record system. Statistical analyses including logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The prevalence of overweight/obesity, high gestational weight gain (GWG) and diabetes was higher in HDP group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas multiparity and uterine fibroids was lower (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Multifactorial analysis shown that overweight/obesity and high GWG might increase risk of HDP while multiparity and having uterine fibroids might reduce risk of HDP in pregnant women (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The ROC curve indicated that pre-pregnancy BMI demonstrated the highest predictive value for the occurrence of HDP. A comparison of pregnancy outcomes revealed that the caesarean section was higher in HDP group than in CON group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this study reaffirmed overweight/obesity and high GWG as risk factors for HDP, while multiparity and uterine fibroids might be protective. HDP was strongly associated with increased caesarean section rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145622369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Midwifery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1