{"title":"Development of a Training Model for Microvascular Tongue Reconstruction","authors":"Takeaki Hidaka, Yutaka Fukunaga, Shimpei Miyamoto, Takuya Higashino","doi":"10.1002/micr.31247","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Near-total to total lower lip defects present significant challenges for reconstructive surgeons, requiring restoration of oral competency, maximization of oral aperture, and cosmetic appearance. This report explores a novel reconstructive option addressing all three needs. Traditionally, local flap options restore cosmesis and oral competency by recruiting local tissue of similar thickness, pliability, and appearance, but often result in microstomia. Conversely, free flaps prevent microstomia but can lead to bulky and cosmetically unacceptable reconstructions. We present the first case of using a super-thin superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) free flap for near-total, full-thickness lower lip reconstruction. The patient was a 66-year-old female with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip, requiring wide local excision and resulting in an 80% full-thickness defect with unilateral oral commissure loss. An 8 cm × 5 cm × 5 mm SCIP flap was raised with a 4.5-cm pedicle length and anastomosed to the facial artery and vein. Clear fluids were commenced 7 days postoperatively, wounds healed 2 weeks postoperatively, and a normal diet was resumed at this time. The SCIP flap offers an excellent additional option for managing full-thickness near-total to total lower lip defects. Its thin, pliable nature and minimal donor site morbidity help restore oral competency, maximize oral aperture, and achieve a pleasing cosmetic result.
{"title":"Full Thickness, Near-Total to Total Lower Lip Reconstruction Using Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Free Flap: A Case Report","authors":"Edward A. Stanley, Vlad Illie","doi":"10.1002/micr.31242","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31242","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Near-total to total lower lip defects present significant challenges for reconstructive surgeons, requiring restoration of oral competency, maximization of oral aperture, and cosmetic appearance. This report explores a novel reconstructive option addressing all three needs. Traditionally, local flap options restore cosmesis and oral competency by recruiting local tissue of similar thickness, pliability, and appearance, but often result in microstomia. Conversely, free flaps prevent microstomia but can lead to bulky and cosmetically unacceptable reconstructions. We present the first case of using a super-thin superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) free flap for near-total, full-thickness lower lip reconstruction. The patient was a 66-year-old female with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip, requiring wide local excision and resulting in an 80% full-thickness defect with unilateral oral commissure loss. An 8 cm × 5 cm × 5 mm SCIP flap was raised with a 4.5-cm pedicle length and anastomosed to the facial artery and vein. Clear fluids were commenced 7 days postoperatively, wounds healed 2 weeks postoperatively, and a normal diet was resumed at this time. The SCIP flap offers an excellent additional option for managing full-thickness near-total to total lower lip defects. Its thin, pliable nature and minimal donor site morbidity help restore oral competency, maximize oral aperture, and achieve a pleasing cosmetic result.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Germann, Patrick Palines, Hannah Doran, Devin M. Melancon, Hugo St. Hilaire, Robert J. Allen, Mark Stalder
Background
With the rising popularity of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in breast reconstruction, use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to augment venous outflow has been proposed as a strategy to prevent venous congestion, a complication positively associated with flap volume. This study evaluated the impact of routine SIEV venous augmentation on the risk of vascular complications or operative fat necrosis in the context of flap size and operating time.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study compared complication rates of patients with SIEV-augmented DIEP flaps to controls over a 3-year period. Outcomes assessed included vascular complications, defined as venous congestion or compromise requiring take-back, partial flap necrosis, total flap loss, as well as operative fat necrosis. Relative risk was modeled by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess for an interaction effect by flap mass.
Results
The study sample included 197 patients with 316 flaps. The mean mass of the SIEV-augmented flaps was significantly greater than in the control group (832.9 vs. 653.9 g; p = 0.0007). After adjustment for flap characteristics, patient demographic factors, and comorbidities, pooled risk of vascular complication and operative fat necrosis was found to be significantly lower in the SIEV-augmented group compared to controls (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI [0.11–1.00]; p = 0.0489). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated no effect interaction by flap weight (p = 0.5139).
Conclusion
Routine venous outflow augmentation via anastomosis of SIEV to the internal mammary vein perforator at the second intercostal space significantly reduced the risk of vascular complications and operative fat necrosis, regardless of flap weight. No significant increase in operative time was observed among cases in which augmentation was performed.
背景：随着乳房重建中下上腹部深穿孔器（DIEP）皮瓣的普及，使用下上腹部浅静脉（SIEV）增加静脉流出已被提出作为预防静脉充血的一种策略，静脉充血是一种与皮瓣体积正相关的并发症。本研究结合皮瓣大小和手术时间，评估了常规上腹部下静脉扩容对血管并发症或手术脂肪坏死风险的影响：一项回顾性队列研究比较了在3年时间内使用SIEV增强DIEP皮瓣的患者与对照组的并发症发生率。评估的结果包括血管并发症（定义为需要收回的静脉充血或损伤）、部分皮瓣坏死、皮瓣完全脱落以及手术脂肪坏死。通过 Cox 比例危险回归分析建立了相对风险模型。进行了敏感性分析，以评估皮瓣质量的交互效应：研究样本包括197名患者，316个皮瓣。SIEV增强皮瓣的平均质量明显高于对照组（832.9 g vs. 653.9 g; p = 0.0007）。对皮瓣特征、患者人口统计学因素和合并症进行调整后发现，与对照组相比，SIEV增强组发生血管并发症和手术脂肪坏死的总体风险明显较低（危险比 = 0.33，95% CI [0.11-1.00]；P = 0.0489）。敏感性分析表明，皮瓣重量不会产生交互影响（p = 0.5139）：结论：无论皮瓣重量如何，通过在第二肋间将SIEV与乳内静脉穿孔器吻合来常规增加静脉外流可显著降低血管并发症和手术脂肪坏死的风险。在进行扩容的病例中，手术时间没有明显增加。
{"title":"The Effect of Venous Augmentation on Complication Rates in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Breast Reconstruction","authors":"Alexander Germann, Patrick Palines, Hannah Doran, Devin M. Melancon, Hugo St. Hilaire, Robert J. Allen, Mark Stalder","doi":"10.1002/micr.31220","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31220","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>With the rising popularity of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in breast reconstruction, use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to augment venous outflow has been proposed as a strategy to prevent venous congestion, a complication positively associated with flap volume. This study evaluated the impact of routine SIEV venous augmentation on the risk of vascular complications or operative fat necrosis in the context of flap size and operating time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective cohort study compared complication rates of patients with SIEV-augmented DIEP flaps to controls over a 3-year period. Outcomes assessed included vascular complications, defined as venous congestion or compromise requiring take-back, partial flap necrosis, total flap loss, as well as operative fat necrosis. Relative risk was modeled by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess for an interaction effect by flap mass.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study sample included 197 patients with 316 flaps. The mean mass of the SIEV-augmented flaps was significantly greater than in the control group (832.9 vs. 653.9 g; <i>p</i> = 0.0007). After adjustment for flap characteristics, patient demographic factors, and comorbidities, pooled risk of vascular complication and operative fat necrosis was found to be significantly lower in the SIEV-augmented group compared to controls (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI [0.11–1.00]; <i>p</i> = 0.0489). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated no effect interaction by flap weight (<i>p</i> = 0.5139).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Routine venous outflow augmentation via anastomosis of SIEV to the internal mammary vein perforator at the second intercostal space significantly reduced the risk of vascular complications and operative fat necrosis, regardless of flap weight. No significant increase in operative time was observed among cases in which augmentation was performed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Satoru Tamura, Ko Yoshizumi, Toshio Netsu, Ryuichi Azuma
{"title":"Microsurgery Training Using AR Glasses","authors":"Satoru Tamura, Ko Yoshizumi, Toshio Netsu, Ryuichi Azuma","doi":"10.1002/micr.31244","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31244","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mehdi S. Lemdani, Dustin T. Crystal, Jane N. Ewing, Zachary Gala, Chris Amro, Said C. Azoury, Robyn B. Broach, Irfan A. Rhemtulla, Joseph M. Serletti
Background
Current consensus has established the internal mammary vessels (IMV) over the thoracodorsal vessels (TDV) as the preferred recipients for microvascular breast reconstruction due to their superior flow rates and long-established outcomes. Yet, there are occurrences where the IMVs are not reliable and may subsequently prompt intraoperative decision-making. Several options exist, including the contralateral IMVs, thoracoacromial vessels, and TDVs. The appropriate sequence for vessel choice is not universally agreed upon. This study reevaluates the TDVs to highlight their viability as a second-line intraoperative alternative to the IMV and provide reference to the straightforward dissection required for harvest.
Methods
A retrospective, single-institution, breast-level analysis examining 4754 breast free flaps from 2978 patients undergoing bilateral free flap reconstruction was conducted. Postoperative complications within 180 days were evaluated, and cohorts based on anatomic anastomosis (IMV vs. TDV) were created to compare outcomes. Subanalysis was conducted based on flap laterality as well as whether a flap was planned or converted intraoperatively.
Results
Of 4754 breast free flaps, 4269 (89.8%) used the IMV while 485 (10.2%) used the TDV. Most complication rates between the TVD and IMV were not significantly different. Rates of flap loss were 1.0% and 1.2% for the IMV and TDV anastomosis (p = 0.59). IMV and TDV anastomosed flaps experienced similar rates of fat necrosis (6.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.915). However, multivariable analysis of all breasts regardless of laterality showed that skin necrosis was significantly less likely in TDV breasts (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.71, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Given the relative similarity in cohort outcomes, TDV anastomosis can be considered a viable alternative to the IMV when the IMV is unavailable or technically disadvantageous. The TDV artery remains a robust and reliable option in the present-day plastic surgeon's repertoire for breast reconstruction.
{"title":"Reevaluation of Recipient Vessel Selection in Breast Free Flap Reconstruction","authors":"Mehdi S. Lemdani, Dustin T. Crystal, Jane N. Ewing, Zachary Gala, Chris Amro, Said C. Azoury, Robyn B. Broach, Irfan A. Rhemtulla, Joseph M. Serletti","doi":"10.1002/micr.31222","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31222","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Current consensus has established the internal mammary vessels (IMV) over the thoracodorsal vessels (TDV) as the preferred recipients for microvascular breast reconstruction due to their superior flow rates and long-established outcomes. Yet, there are occurrences where the IMVs are not reliable and may subsequently prompt intraoperative decision-making. Several options exist, including the contralateral IMVs, thoracoacromial vessels, and TDVs. The appropriate sequence for vessel choice is not universally agreed upon. This study reevaluates the TDVs to highlight their viability as a second-line intraoperative alternative to the IMV and provide reference to the straightforward dissection required for harvest.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective, single-institution, breast-level analysis examining 4754 breast free flaps from 2978 patients undergoing bilateral free flap reconstruction was conducted. Postoperative complications within 180 days were evaluated, and cohorts based on anatomic anastomosis (IMV vs. TDV) were created to compare outcomes. Subanalysis was conducted based on flap laterality as well as whether a flap was planned or converted intraoperatively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 4754 breast free flaps, 4269 (89.8%) used the IMV while 485 (10.2%) used the TDV. Most complication rates between the TVD and IMV were not significantly different. Rates of flap loss were 1.0% and 1.2% for the IMV and TDV anastomosis (<i>p</i> = 0.59). IMV and TDV anastomosed flaps experienced similar rates of fat necrosis (6.3% vs. 6.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.915). However, multivariable analysis of all breasts regardless of laterality showed that skin necrosis was significantly less likely in TDV breasts (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Given the relative similarity in cohort outcomes, TDV anastomosis can be considered a viable alternative to the IMV when the IMV is unavailable or technically disadvantageous. The TDV artery remains a robust and reliable option in the present-day plastic surgeon's repertoire for breast reconstruction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/micr.31222","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142350001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Artur Manasyan, Eloise W. Stanton, Erin Wolfe, Joseph N. Carey, David A. Daar
Introduction
Lower extremity (LE) reconstruction in the elderly population presents a multifaceted challenge, primarily due to age-related degenerative changes, comorbidities, and functional decline. Elderly individuals often encounter conditions such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular and peripheral artery disease (PAD), which can severely compromise the structural integrity and function of the lower limbs. As such, we aim to assess postoperative complications and functional recovery following LE reconstruction in elderly patients.
Methods
Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent post-traumatic LE reconstruction with flap reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, flap/wound characteristics, complications, and ambulation for the elderly (≥ 60 years old) and the control (< 60 years old) cohorts were recorded. The primary outcome was final ambulation status, modeled with logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications.
Results
The mean ages of the control (n = 374) and elderly (n = 49) groups were 37.4 ± 12.6 and 65.8 ± 5.1 years, respectively. Elderly patients more frequently required amputation after flap surgery (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in preoperative ambulation status (p = 0.053). Postoperatively, 22.4% of elderly patients were independently ambulatory at final follow-up, compared to 49.5% of patients < 60. Of the elderly, 14.3% could ambulate with an assistance device (cane, walker, etc.), compared to 26.5% in the control group. A wheelchair was required for 46.9% of elderly patients, significantly higher than the 22.7% of those < 60 years of age (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed an association between older age and nonambulatory final status (p = 0.033).
Conclusion
LE reconstruction can likely be performed safely in patients 60 years of age or older. However, older age is independently associated with significantly worse postoperative ambulation. Preoperative assessment, including gait and muscle strength, and early initiation of postoperative rehabilitation can potentially improve ambulation in elderly individuals undergoing LE reconstruction.
{"title":"Flap-Based Lower Extremity Reconstruction in the Elderly—Is It Safe and Does Age Impact Ambulation?","authors":"Artur Manasyan, Eloise W. Stanton, Erin Wolfe, Joseph N. Carey, David A. Daar","doi":"10.1002/micr.31239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.31239","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Lower extremity (LE) reconstruction in the elderly population presents a multifaceted challenge, primarily due to age-related degenerative changes, comorbidities, and functional decline. Elderly individuals often encounter conditions such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular and peripheral artery disease (PAD), which can severely compromise the structural integrity and function of the lower limbs. As such, we aim to assess postoperative complications and functional recovery following LE reconstruction in elderly patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent post-traumatic LE reconstruction with flap reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, flap/wound characteristics, complications, and ambulation for the elderly (≥ 60 years old) and the control (< 60 years old) cohorts were recorded. The primary outcome was final ambulation status, modeled with logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean ages of the control (<i>n</i> = 374) and elderly (<i>n</i> = 49) groups were 37.4 ± 12.6 and 65.8 ± 5.1 years, respectively. Elderly patients more frequently required amputation after flap surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in preoperative ambulation status (<i>p</i> = 0.053). Postoperatively, 22.4% of elderly patients were independently ambulatory at final follow-up, compared to 49.5% of patients < 60. Of the elderly, 14.3% could ambulate with an assistance device (cane, walker, etc.), compared to 26.5% in the control group. A wheelchair was required for 46.9% of elderly patients, significantly higher than the 22.7% of those < 60 years of age (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed an association between older age and nonambulatory final status (<i>p</i> = 0.033).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>LE reconstruction can likely be performed safely in patients 60 years of age or older. However, older age is independently associated with significantly worse postoperative ambulation. Preoperative assessment, including gait and muscle strength, and early initiation of postoperative rehabilitation can potentially improve ambulation in elderly individuals undergoing LE reconstruction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142273259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leah Ahn, Joani M. Christensen, Seth Fruge, Mara Z. Meulendijks, Yannick Albert J. Hoftiezer, Frankie K. Wong, Krystle R. Tuano, Ian L. Valerio, Kyle R. Eberlin
Background
Adequate vascular anatomy and perfusion status are essential for successful lower extremity free tissue transfer. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is widely available, minimally invasive, and enables visualization of soft tissues and bones. Angiography permits temporal evaluation of flow, identifies potential needs for concurrent endovascular interventions, and enhances visibility in the setting of hardware. Despite widespread availability of these imaging modalities, no standardized algorithm for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction exists.
Methods
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes identified patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity over an 18-year period (2002–2020). Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient, treatment, and imaging characteristics, and pre- and post-imaging laboratory values. Outcomes included imaging findings and related complications and surgical outcomes.
Results
In total, 405 patients were identified, with 59% (n = 238) undergoing preoperative imaging with angiography, 10% (n = 42) with CTA, 7.2% (n = 29) with both imaging modalities, and 24% (n = 96) with neither performed. Forty percent (122 of 309) of patients who underwent preoperative imaging had less than 3-vessel runoff. Four patients developed contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after angiography only and one after having both CTA and angiography. Vessel runoff on CTA and angiography demonstrated moderate correlation.
Conclusion
Most patients undergoing lower extremity free tissue transfer underwent preoperative imaging with angiography and/or CTA, 40% of which had less than 3-vessel runoff. Both angiography and CTA had low complication rates, with no statistically significant risk factors identified. Specifically, the incidence of CIN was not found to be significant using either modality. We discuss our institutional algorithm to aid in decision-making for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction. Specifically, we recommend angiography for patients with peripheral vascular disease, internal hardware, or distal defects secondary to trauma.
{"title":"Preoperative Vascular Imaging in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction: Comparison Between Imaging Modalities","authors":"Leah Ahn, Joani M. Christensen, Seth Fruge, Mara Z. Meulendijks, Yannick Albert J. Hoftiezer, Frankie K. Wong, Krystle R. Tuano, Ian L. Valerio, Kyle R. Eberlin","doi":"10.1002/micr.31241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.31241","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adequate vascular anatomy and perfusion status are essential for successful lower extremity free tissue transfer. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is widely available, minimally invasive, and enables visualization of soft tissues and bones. Angiography permits temporal evaluation of flow, identifies potential needs for concurrent endovascular interventions, and enhances visibility in the setting of hardware. Despite widespread availability of these imaging modalities, no standardized algorithm for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction exists.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes identified patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity over an 18-year period (2002–2020). Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient, treatment, and imaging characteristics, and pre- and post-imaging laboratory values. Outcomes included imaging findings and related complications and surgical outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In total, 405 patients were identified, with 59% (<i>n</i> = 238) undergoing preoperative imaging with angiography, 10% (<i>n</i> = 42) with CTA, 7.2% (<i>n</i> = 29) with both imaging modalities, and 24% (<i>n</i> = 96) with neither performed. Forty percent (122 of 309) of patients who underwent preoperative imaging had less than 3-vessel runoff. Four patients developed contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after angiography only and one after having both CTA and angiography. Vessel runoff on CTA and angiography demonstrated moderate correlation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Most patients undergoing lower extremity free tissue transfer underwent preoperative imaging with angiography and/or CTA, 40% of which had less than 3-vessel runoff. Both angiography and CTA had low complication rates, with no statistically significant risk factors identified. Specifically, the incidence of CIN was not found to be significant using either modality. We discuss our institutional algorithm to aid in decision-making for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction. Specifically, we recommend angiography for patients with peripheral vascular disease, internal hardware, or distal defects secondary to trauma.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142273258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Frank O. F. Reilly, Ioannis Georgopoulos, Håkan Jonsson, Kevin Mani, Andrés Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Nikos Schizas
Septic nonunion after vertebral fusion can lead to significant patient disability. The management of septic nonunions usually involves surgical debridement, bone fixation, and antibiotic therapy. Particularly challenging is lumbosacral vertebral nonunions, which necessitate a difficult surgical approach. We present a novel approach using a scapula tip free flap through an intra-abdominal approach to reconstruct a L5–S1 vertebral defect after a septic nonunion. Our patient, 31-year-old man, with no medical conditions, had a fusion of L5–S1 due to severe lower back pain secondary to isthmic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Despite multiple attempts of surgical fusion, postoperatively the patient developed a septic nonunion. Following a modified DAIR, the nonunion was reconstructed with a scapula tip bone flap 4 × 3 × 2 cm. The subscapular vessels were anastomosed to the deep inferior epigastric vessels after an intra-abdominal inset. The patient was discharged at 15 days postoperatively without any complications. At 1-year follow-up the patient is pain-free, off opiate analgesia with radiological evidence of fusion between the scapula tip, L5 and the S1 vertebral body. This case report describes the use, for the first time, of a free scapula tip, to a lumbosacral spinal defect. The use of the free scapula tip flap may be considered for reconstruction of osseous spinal defects due to its long pedicle and the unique bone shape.
{"title":"Free Vascularized Scapula tip Flap to L5—S1 Vertebral Defect After Chronic Infection Related to Interbody Fusion Cage: A Case Report","authors":"Frank O. F. Reilly, Ioannis Georgopoulos, Håkan Jonsson, Kevin Mani, Andrés Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Nikos Schizas","doi":"10.1002/micr.31236","DOIUrl":"10.1002/micr.31236","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Septic nonunion after vertebral fusion can lead to significant patient disability. The management of septic nonunions usually involves surgical debridement, bone fixation, and antibiotic therapy. Particularly challenging is lumbosacral vertebral nonunions, which necessitate a difficult surgical approach. We present a novel approach using a scapula tip free flap through an intra-abdominal approach to reconstruct a L5–S1 vertebral defect after a septic nonunion. Our patient, 31-year-old man, with no medical conditions, had a fusion of L5–S1 due to severe lower back pain secondary to isthmic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Despite multiple attempts of surgical fusion, postoperatively the patient developed a septic nonunion. Following a modified DAIR, the nonunion was reconstructed with a scapula tip bone flap 4 × 3 × 2 cm. The subscapular vessels were anastomosed to the deep inferior epigastric vessels after an intra-abdominal inset. The patient was discharged at 15 days postoperatively without any complications. At 1-year follow-up the patient is pain-free, off opiate analgesia with radiological evidence of fusion between the scapula tip, L5 and the S1 vertebral body. This case report describes the use, for the first time, of a free scapula tip, to a lumbosacral spinal defect. The use of the free scapula tip flap may be considered for reconstruction of osseous spinal defects due to its long pedicle and the unique bone shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/micr.31236","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pierre-Louis Chiche, François Avry, Julien Drouet, Pierre Weill, Hervé Bénateau, Quentin Qassemyar, Rachid Garmi
Introduction
Facial artery perforator (FAP) flap is a versatile and reliable one-step facial reconstruction technique. However, its full potential remains underutilized due to a lack of clear guidelines and rigorous technique requirements. This study report the use of FAP flaps in our centre for the management of perioral and nasal oncologic defects, focusing on surgical technique performed and post-operative management.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent reconstruction with a perioral or perinasal FAP flap only following tumor resection over a 4-year period (n = 29). Parameters measured included flap survival, complication rates, surgical technique performed, and the need for touch-up procedures. Patients were grouped based on age, defect size, and location and outcomes were compared across these groups.
Results
The mean histological tumor defect area was 331 mm2. During at least 6 months of follow-up, no local recurrence was observed. Twenty-seven (93.1%) flaps survived completely. Major postsurgical complications occurred in seven (23.8%) patients, including complete flap necrosis (1), partial flap necrosis (1), flap collapse (1), venous congestion (1), wound dehiscence (1), and local infection (2). A higher complication rate was associated with nose tip defects (80.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.007). Touch-up procedures were more frequently required for reconstructions involving the nasal sidewall and dorsum (53.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.04).
Conclusion
Based on our experience, the FAP flap is highly effective for the reconstruction of the upper lip, nasolabial fold, and certain oncologic nasal defects. However, specific defect locations, such as the nose tip, may be associated with higher complication rates, necessitating careful patient selection and surgical planning.
{"title":"Facial Artery Perforator Flap for Perioral and Perinasal Oncologic Defect Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Outcomes","authors":"Pierre-Louis Chiche, François Avry, Julien Drouet, Pierre Weill, Hervé Bénateau, Quentin Qassemyar, Rachid Garmi","doi":"10.1002/micr.31238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.31238","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Facial artery perforator (FAP) flap is a versatile and reliable one-step facial reconstruction technique. However, its full potential remains underutilized due to a lack of clear guidelines and rigorous technique requirements. This study report the use of FAP flaps in our centre for the management of perioral and nasal oncologic defects, focusing on surgical technique performed and post-operative management.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent reconstruction with a perioral or perinasal FAP flap only following tumor resection over a 4-year period (<i>n</i> = 29). Parameters measured included flap survival, complication rates, surgical technique performed, and the need for touch-up procedures. Patients were grouped based on age, defect size, and location and outcomes were compared across these groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean histological tumor defect area was 331 mm<sup>2</sup>. During at least 6 months of follow-up, no local recurrence was observed. Twenty-seven (93.1%) flaps survived completely. Major postsurgical complications occurred in seven (23.8%) patients, including complete flap necrosis (1), partial flap necrosis (1), flap collapse (1), venous congestion (1), wound dehiscence (1), and local infection (2). A higher complication rate was associated with nose tip defects (80.0% vs. 12.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Touch-up procedures were more frequently required for reconstructions involving the nasal sidewall and dorsum (53.8% vs. 13.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Based on our experience, the FAP flap is highly effective for the reconstruction of the upper lip, nasolabial fold, and certain oncologic nasal defects. However, specific defect locations, such as the nose tip, may be associated with higher complication rates, necessitating careful patient selection and surgical planning.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142244999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号