Human and land have a strong relations, very pure and undivided. It can be understood, because land is a home, provide food, birth place, buried place, and home of the ancestor. There are always a relations between human and land, society and a land. The constitution in 1945 article 33 clause 3 mention that earth, water and space with all its contents are controlled by nation and uses for public prosperity, that regulated in land laws are the gift of God almighty, based on rule right from the nation, so its become the government responsibility to perform land registration in all of territory of Republic Indonesia based on law number 5 year 1960 about basic rule of principles of agrarian that further mentioned in UUPA that individualistic, communal, religious, it aims to protect the land and manage the relation of land right through the certificate submission as a proof of land right for it owner. Article 4 clause 2 mention that certificate that mentioned in clause 1 is printed in one sheet based on information from physical and juridical data also equipped by owner’s photo. As one of society essential needs, land have an important roles in society lives. In the process of achieving the certificate, land registration process must be adjusted to law and technology development and society needs that regulated in Ministerial Regulation of Agrarian and Spatial / Head of National Land Agency number 7 year 2017 about shape and content of certificate of land right.
{"title":"KESIAPAN BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KOTA SAMARINDA DALAM PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT 1 (SATU) LEMBAR (MENURUT PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANG / KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG /BENTUK DAN ISI SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH)","authors":"Muchamad Naufal Zakiy, Jaidun Jaidun","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v10i2.354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i2.354","url":null,"abstract":"Human and land have a strong relations, very pure and undivided. It can be understood, because land is a home, provide food, birth place, buried place, and home of the ancestor. There are always a relations between human and land, society and a land. The constitution in 1945 article 33 clause 3 mention that earth, water and space with all its contents are controlled by nation and uses for public prosperity, that regulated in land laws are the gift of God almighty, based on rule right from the nation, so its become the government responsibility to perform land registration in all of territory of Republic Indonesia based on law number 5 year 1960 about basic rule of principles of agrarian that further mentioned in UUPA that individualistic, communal, religious, it aims to protect the land and manage the relation of land right through the certificate submission as a proof of land right for it owner. Article 4 clause 2 mention that certificate that mentioned in clause 1 is printed in one sheet based on information from physical and juridical data also equipped by owner’s photo. As one of society essential needs, land have an important roles in society lives. In the process of achieving the certificate, land registration process must be adjusted to law and technology development and society needs that regulated in Ministerial Regulation of Agrarian and Spatial / Head of National Land Agency number 7 year 2017 about shape and content of certificate of land right.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115039424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The right to use is regulated in Article 41 through Article 43 which is further regulated in Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Right to Cultivate, Right to Build and Right to Use of Land Article 41 to Article 58. In Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Basic Agrarian Law, is defined as the Right to Use is the right to use and / or collect proceeds from land that is directly controlled by the state or land of the Property of another person, who gives authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by an official authorized to give it or in an agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything originating does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this law.So that the cause of the cancellation of the second right is the position of the building above the usufructuary rights to the land that has been cancelled. The position of the building this case is not only in the physical sense concerning the location and magnitude of the building alone, more than that it has a legal meaning concerning the legal position of the building. This is related to ownership rights and land rights attached to it. The method used in this study is a normative research study with legislation as primary legal material, books, literature as secondary legal material and information and data as secondary material from this study.In principle, the matter that causes the Right to Use of Land can be canceled is the expiration of the term or canceled by the authorized official, the management right holder or the landowner before the expiry date, released voluntarily by the right holder before the term expires, the right of use is revoked, abandoned, the land is destroyed and the Right of Use holder does not qualify as the Right to Use holder. Whereas in relation to the position of the building above the Use of Land Rights by the Indonesian Citizen who has been cancelled depends on the agreement that accompanies when the right to use is granted, but for foreigners through the right to use can transfer their assets through inheritance.
{"title":"KAJIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN BANGUNAN DI ATAS HAK PAKAI ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DI BATALKAN (Di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan Dan Hak Pakai Atas Tanah)","authors":"M. Jaelani, Abdul Mukmin","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v10i2.352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i2.352","url":null,"abstract":"The right to use is regulated in Article 41 through Article 43 which is further regulated in Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Right to Cultivate, Right to Build and Right to Use of Land Article 41 to Article 58. In Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Basic Agrarian Law, is defined as the Right to Use is the right to use and / or collect proceeds from land that is directly controlled by the state or land of the Property of another person, who gives authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by an official authorized to give it or in an agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything originating does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this law.So that the cause of the cancellation of the second right is the position of the building above the usufructuary rights to the land that has been cancelled. The position of the building this case is not only in the physical sense concerning the location and magnitude of the building alone, more than that it has a legal meaning concerning the legal position of the building. This is related to ownership rights and land rights attached to it. The method used in this study is a normative research study with legislation as primary legal material, books, literature as secondary legal material and information and data as secondary material from this study.In principle, the matter that causes the Right to Use of Land can be canceled is the expiration of the term or canceled by the authorized official, the management right holder or the landowner before the expiry date, released voluntarily by the right holder before the term expires, the right of use is revoked, abandoned, the land is destroyed and the Right of Use holder does not qualify as the Right to Use holder. Whereas in relation to the position of the building above the Use of Land Rights by the Indonesian Citizen who has been cancelled depends on the agreement that accompanies when the right to use is granted, but for foreigners through the right to use can transfer their assets through inheritance.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131052263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Unitary Republic of Indonesia's Republic of Indonesia in organizing the system of government embraces the principle of Decentralization by providing opportunities and freedom to the regions to organize Regional Autonomy. Indonesia is a regional entity consisting of central government and local government, as regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is divided into provinces and provinces are divided into districts and city, where each province, district, and city have local government, which is regulated by law. The district / municipality government comprises the subdistrict area, and each sub-district has village / village in it, the village's new face becomes the hope of accompanying the establishment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on the Village which becomes the starting point of the village's hope to be able to determine the position, role and authority over himself so that the village can be politically and politically swayed as the foundation of village democracy, as well as economically and culturally dignified as the face of village self-reliance and rural development. Article 26 has given the village chief the opportunity to manage the finances and assets owned by the village. The stages of the village financial management have been regulated by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 113 of 2014 on Village Financial Management, and the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016 on Village Asset Management regulates the procedures for managing village assets. The management of village finances and assets can’t be separated from the ability of the Village Head and other village apparatus. The responsibility of the Village Head in managing village finances and assets properly, transparently and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations is necessary to promote the development and economy of the village, including Karang Tunggal village as one of government under Kutai Kartanegara.
{"title":"PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEPALA DESA KARANG TUNGGAL KECAMATAN TENGGARONG SEBERANG KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA DALAM HAL PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAN ASET DESA (DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA)","authors":"Andreas Susanto Marbun, Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V10I2.351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V10I2.351","url":null,"abstract":"The Unitary Republic of Indonesia's Republic of Indonesia in organizing the system of government embraces the principle of Decentralization by providing opportunities and freedom to the regions to organize Regional Autonomy. Indonesia is a regional entity consisting of central government and local government, as regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is divided into provinces and provinces are divided into districts and city, where each province, district, and city have local government, which is regulated by law. The district / municipality government comprises the subdistrict area, and each sub-district has village / village in it, the village's new face becomes the hope of accompanying the establishment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on the Village which becomes the starting point of the village's hope to be able to determine the position, role and authority over himself so that the village can be politically and politically swayed as the foundation of village democracy, as well as economically and culturally dignified as the face of village self-reliance and rural development. Article 26 has given the village chief the opportunity to manage the finances and assets owned by the village. The stages of the village financial management have been regulated by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 113 of 2014 on Village Financial Management, and the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016 on Village Asset Management regulates the procedures for managing village assets. The management of village finances and assets can’t be separated from the ability of the Village Head and other village apparatus. The responsibility of the Village Head in managing village finances and assets properly, transparently and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations is necessary to promote the development and economy of the village, including Karang Tunggal village as one of government under Kutai Kartanegara. ","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128884223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
After a long time was not heard to the public area, lately death penalty toward the criminal cases that classified as extraordinary crime are appear. The author discovers electronic article about the execution of the death penalty which is the prosecutor prepares to execute death penalty toward the drugs dealer. The president of Republic of Indonesia stated that it is necessary to give a deterrent effect to the convicted criminal and keep the morality of Indonesian teenagers. According to my opinion, the author argues that it will be better and wiser if we discuss about renovating all of the Penitentiary in Indonesia than debating whether death penalty could be done in Indonesia or not, because it will be displeasure many parties, death penalty infringed the human rights of the convicted criminals and cause psychological burden to them, families, the executor of the death penalty, and other parties. Because if we have to improve the quality of the Penitentiary, if the function of Penitentiary for fostering moralily has been optimal or properly enough to the convicted criminals, Indonesia will be no longer need the death penalty option as sanction to the convicted crimanals including for the extraordinary crime (especially for drugs trafficking in our country). Penitentiary is one of the public services which aims for fostering the people that initially have bad habits (commited to the crime), so that they will have the awareness to change their bad attitude into the be better ones, will not harm others, and positively contributed to the society. Already Penitentiary’s conditions should be designed in such a way and as good as possible, so that the inmates feels like at their own home (like having a second home after his own home), and feel humaner to spend their days in the Penitentiary. The author believes that if the Penitentiary has been improved and optimized its function well, then the real purpose of Penitentiary will definitely achieved. As stated in Law Number 12 Year 1995 regarding to Penitentiary Article 2 which states "sanction system are organized in order to fostering the convicted criminals in order to be the real man, aware of their fault, improve themselves, and not to repeat the criminal act so that they can be friendly received by the community, can actively participated in the development of our country, and can socialize themselves as good citizen."Article 3 on this regulation also intensifies the function of Penitentiary "the function of Penitentiary is to prepare convicted criminals to be able to properly integrated to the society, so they can be accepted again as members of the public who are free and responsible ones."
{"title":"PEMBENAHAN TERHADAP LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DAPAT MENIADAKAN OPSI HUKUMAN MATI BAGI NARAPIDANA DI INDONESIA (THE IMPROVEMENT OF QUALITY OF PENITENTIARY CAN ELIMINATE THE DEATH PENALTY OPTIONS OF CONVICTED CRIMINALS IN INDONESIA)","authors":"Nomensen Freddy Siahaan","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v10i2.359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i2.359","url":null,"abstract":"After a long time was not heard to the public area, lately death penalty toward the criminal cases that classified as extraordinary crime are appear. The author discovers electronic article about the execution of the death penalty which is the prosecutor prepares to execute death penalty toward the drugs dealer. The president of Republic of Indonesia stated that it is necessary to give a deterrent effect to the convicted criminal and keep the morality of Indonesian teenagers. According to my opinion, the author argues that it will be better and wiser if we discuss about renovating all of the Penitentiary in Indonesia than debating whether death penalty could be done in Indonesia or not, because it will be displeasure many parties, death penalty infringed the human rights of the convicted criminals and cause psychological burden to them, families, the executor of the death penalty, and other parties. Because if we have to improve the quality of the Penitentiary, if the function of Penitentiary for fostering moralily has been optimal or properly enough to the convicted criminals, Indonesia will be no longer need the death penalty option as sanction to the convicted crimanals including for the extraordinary crime (especially for drugs trafficking in our country). Penitentiary is one of the public services which aims for fostering the people that initially have bad habits (commited to the crime), so that they will have the awareness to change their bad attitude into the be better ones, will not harm others, and positively contributed to the society. Already Penitentiary’s conditions should be designed in such a way and as good as possible, so that the inmates feels like at their own home (like having a second home after his own home), and feel humaner to spend their days in the Penitentiary. The author believes that if the Penitentiary has been improved and optimized its function well, then the real purpose of Penitentiary will definitely achieved. As stated in Law Number 12 Year 1995 regarding to Penitentiary Article 2 which states \"sanction system are organized in order to fostering the convicted criminals in order to be the real man, aware of their fault, improve themselves, and not to repeat the criminal act so that they can be friendly received by the community, can actively participated in the development of our country, and can socialize themselves as good citizen.\"Article 3 on this regulation also intensifies the function of Penitentiary \"the function of Penitentiary is to prepare convicted criminals to be able to properly integrated to the society, so they can be accepted again as members of the public who are free and responsible ones.\" ","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122345727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Suatu perjanjian dibuat dengan kesepakatan para pihak, tapi didalam dunia bisnis suatu bentuk dan norma hukum yang efisien diperlukan sebagai suatu acuan dasar dberkontrak.Pada dasarnya asas KEBERIMBANGAN merupakan perwujudan doktrin “keadilan berkontrak” yang mengoreksi dominasi asas kebebasan berkontrak yang dalam beberapa hal justru menimbulkan ketidakadilan. Dalam hal terjadinya sengketa kontrak, maka beban pembuktian, apakah kadarnya ringan atau berat atau sebab dari hal – hal lain harus diukur berdasarkan asas proporsionalitas untuk memperoleh hasil penyelesaian yang elegan dan win – win solution dari pada suatu Perjanjian yang ada.
{"title":"PENERAPAN ASAS PROPORSIONALITAS/BERIMBANG DALAM PERJANJIAN KEMITRAAN","authors":"D. Pribadi","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v10i1.265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i1.265","url":null,"abstract":"Suatu perjanjian dibuat dengan kesepakatan para pihak, tapi didalam dunia bisnis suatu bentuk dan norma hukum yang efisien diperlukan sebagai suatu acuan dasar dberkontrak.Pada dasarnya asas KEBERIMBANGAN merupakan perwujudan doktrin “keadilan berkontrak” yang mengoreksi dominasi asas kebebasan berkontrak yang dalam beberapa hal justru menimbulkan ketidakadilan. Dalam hal terjadinya sengketa kontrak, maka beban pembuktian, apakah kadarnya ringan atau berat atau sebab dari hal – hal lain harus diukur berdasarkan asas proporsionalitas untuk memperoleh hasil penyelesaian yang elegan dan win – win solution dari pada suatu Perjanjian yang ada.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116661146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The relation between legal subjects such as person or legal entity in a case, frequently generates dispute. Along with the complexity of social life, then, the more parties are involved in the dispute, the wider scope of the dispute case. One of the concerned dispute in the society is Industrial Relations Disputes that become the competence of Industrial Relations Court. Since 2015, The Act No. 2/2004 about Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement has enforced effectively, it still has many weaknesses, wether from practical or regulation aspects. The legal problems of its Act cause the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute become less effective and efficient, also hamper the principle of constante justitite (principle of rapid, fair and easy trial). The research concluded that the practical/operational level of the Judges Panel in examining and adjudicating the cases of Industrial Relations Dispute in Industrial Relations Court of Samarinda, which tend to apply the general civil procedure law, from the examination of legal standing of the parties, exception, interlocutory decision, replik, duplik, writen proof, the witnesses, experts/professional witnesses, conclusion and verdict. This procedures only prolong the examination and trial process to settle the case of Industrial Relations Dispute. Therefore, the SOP (Standard Operational Procedure) of the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute cannot be well-implemented yet as the mandate of the law.
{"title":"MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI KLAS IA SAMARINDA","authors":"Maryanto Maryanto, Wahyuni Safitri","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V10I1.267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V10I1.267","url":null,"abstract":"The relation between legal subjects such as person or legal entity in a case, frequently generates dispute. Along with the complexity of social life, then, the more parties are involved in the dispute, the wider scope of the dispute case. One of the concerned dispute in the society is Industrial Relations Disputes that become the competence of Industrial Relations Court. Since 2015, The Act No. 2/2004 about Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement has enforced effectively, it still has many weaknesses, wether from practical or regulation aspects. The legal problems of its Act cause the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute become less effective and efficient, also hamper the principle of constante justitite (principle of rapid, fair and easy trial). The research concluded that the practical/operational level of the Judges Panel in examining and adjudicating the cases of Industrial Relations Dispute in Industrial Relations Court of Samarinda, which tend to apply the general civil procedure law, from the examination of legal standing of the parties, exception, interlocutory decision, replik, duplik, writen proof, the witnesses, experts/professional witnesses, conclusion and verdict. This procedures only prolong the examination and trial process to settle the case of Industrial Relations Dispute. Therefore, the SOP (Standard Operational Procedure) of the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute cannot be well-implemented yet as the mandate of the law. ","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128948614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health and Safety of Hospital Work (K3RS) is the application of UUD 1945 chapter 27 verse (2) and Chapter 28 H and Health Ministry’s Regulation number 66 2016. K3 has existed since long time ago and its application has been less satisfactory as this was proven by UU number 1 1970 about Work Safety and UU number 44 2009 about Hospital. The application of K3RS is one of the actions taken to ensure and protect the safety and health of the human resources of the hospital, patients, nurses, visitors, and its environment as well as its physical condition. Health Ministry’s Regulation Number 66 2016 specifically describes about K3RS but there is no clear and detail description on what the hospital’s responsibilities are along with their consequences.The problem studied is related to the administrative responsibilities of the hospital along with their consequences for not executing Health Ministry’s Regulation Number 66 2016 in terms of K3RS. Method used for this law research is Normative Jurisdictive with referential and field study as the data collection technique. The writer did the research by looking for and collecting secondary data, compiled, described, and then analyzed in order to form a systematic, factual, and accurate description of the facts, characteristics or multi-phenomenon relationship studied. Data were analyzed qualitatively and the conclusion was drawn from there which later became the answer of the problem of this research.From the findings of the research, it was proven that there wasn’t optimum administrative responsibilities of the hospital and there were neither consequences addressed in written nor in person form in regards of why the K3RS was not implemented. The conclusion was drawn from this research was the administrative responsibilities of the hospital related to K3RS were not continuously applied and the written consequences form of the Health Ministry’s Regulation was not strict.
{"title":"KAJIAN HUKUM TENTANG TANGGUNG JAWAB ADMINISTRASI RUMAH SAKIT TERHADAP KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN MENTERI KESEHATAN NOMOR 66 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA RUMAH SAKIT","authors":"Sinatra Gunawan","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V10I1.266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V10I1.266","url":null,"abstract":"Health and Safety of Hospital Work (K3RS) is the application of UUD 1945 chapter 27 verse (2) and Chapter 28 H and Health Ministry’s Regulation number 66 2016. K3 has existed since long time ago and its application has been less satisfactory as this was proven by UU number 1 1970 about Work Safety and UU number 44 2009 about Hospital. The application of K3RS is one of the actions taken to ensure and protect the safety and health of the human resources of the hospital, patients, nurses, visitors, and its environment as well as its physical condition. Health Ministry’s Regulation Number 66 2016 specifically describes about K3RS but there is no clear and detail description on what the hospital’s responsibilities are along with their consequences.The problem studied is related to the administrative responsibilities of the hospital along with their consequences for not executing Health Ministry’s Regulation Number 66 2016 in terms of K3RS. Method used for this law research is Normative Jurisdictive with referential and field study as the data collection technique. The writer did the research by looking for and collecting secondary data, compiled, described, and then analyzed in order to form a systematic, factual, and accurate description of the facts, characteristics or multi-phenomenon relationship studied. Data were analyzed qualitatively and the conclusion was drawn from there which later became the answer of the problem of this research.From the findings of the research, it was proven that there wasn’t optimum administrative responsibilities of the hospital and there were neither consequences addressed in written nor in person form in regards of why the K3RS was not implemented. The conclusion was drawn from this research was the administrative responsibilities of the hospital related to K3RS were not continuously applied and the written consequences form of the Health Ministry’s Regulation was not strict.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122499159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap Hak Tanggungan, terdapat 3 (tiga) pihak yang memiliki kepentingan didalamnya, yaitu pihak kreditor selaku pemegang Hak Tanggungan yang berkepentingan untuk segera memperoleh pelunasan utang debitor, pihak debitor yang berkepentingan agar dihormati hak kebendaannya yang masih melekat atas objek jaminan Hak Tanggungan, serta pihak calon pembeli jaminan Hak Tanggungan yang berkepentingan untuk dapat menguasai objek kebendaan yang dimilikinya beserta surat-surat bukti milik yang diperlukan untuk itu segera setelah jual beli terlaksana melalui pelelangan umum. Kepentingan para pihak sebagaimana diuraikan diatas menarik penulis untuk mengadakan penelitian serta penulisan untuk itu ketika persoalan perimbangan kepentingan diantara pihak berkepentingan terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan ini sendiri menurut penulis tidak terakomodir didalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai Hak Tanggungan yang berlaku sekarang ini. Penelitian yang dilakukan penulis menunjukkan pentingnya badan peradilan untuk mewujudkan keadilan serta kepastian hukum diantara para pihak yang berkepentingan atas pelaksanaan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, serta diperlukannya penghapusan kewenangan kreditor untuk menjual dengan kekuasaan sendiri melalui pelelangan umum atas objek Hak Tanggungan yang masih melekat atasnya hak kebendaan daripada debitor sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.
{"title":"MEWUJUDKAN EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG BERKEADILAN DAN BERKEPASTIAN HUKUM","authors":"B. Pasaribu","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V9I2.225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V9I2.225","url":null,"abstract":"Dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap Hak Tanggungan, terdapat 3 (tiga) pihak yang memiliki kepentingan didalamnya, yaitu pihak kreditor selaku pemegang Hak Tanggungan yang berkepentingan untuk segera memperoleh pelunasan utang debitor, pihak debitor yang berkepentingan agar dihormati hak kebendaannya yang masih melekat atas objek jaminan Hak Tanggungan, serta pihak calon pembeli jaminan Hak Tanggungan yang berkepentingan untuk dapat menguasai objek kebendaan yang dimilikinya beserta surat-surat bukti milik yang diperlukan untuk itu segera setelah jual beli terlaksana melalui pelelangan umum. Kepentingan para pihak sebagaimana diuraikan diatas menarik penulis untuk mengadakan penelitian serta penulisan untuk itu ketika persoalan perimbangan kepentingan diantara pihak berkepentingan terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan ini sendiri menurut penulis tidak terakomodir didalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai Hak Tanggungan yang berlaku sekarang ini. Penelitian yang dilakukan penulis menunjukkan pentingnya badan peradilan untuk mewujudkan keadilan serta kepastian hukum diantara para pihak yang berkepentingan atas pelaksanaan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, serta diperlukannya penghapusan kewenangan kreditor untuk menjual dengan kekuasaan sendiri melalui pelelangan umum atas objek Hak Tanggungan yang masih melekat atasnya hak kebendaan daripada debitor sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133581055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelitian hukum adalah sebuah kegiatan ilmiah dalam rangka mengembangkan ilmu pengetahuan hukum dan untuk mengetahu beberapa kasus atau masalah pada semua kegiatan, termasuk masalah-masalah yang sedang berkembang dibeberapa daerah. Penelitian hukum terdiri dari dua jenis, yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empiris. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah sebuiah penelitian mengenai prinsisp-prinsip, sistematika, sinkronisasi, sejarah dan perbandingan hukum yang menggunakan data primer berupa perundang-undangan dan data sekunder berbentuk literatur. Penelitian hukum empiris sosiologis terdiri dari penelitian indentifikasi hukum tidak tertulis dan penelitian keefektian bekerjanya hukum dilapangan atau pada masyarakat, yang menggunakan data primer berupa gejala sosial pada masyarakat, dan data sekunder dalam bentuk peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur. Penelitian hukum sangat diperlukan dalam rangka pembangunan daerah, mulai dari perencanaan, pada saat pelaksanaan proyek sampai selesai, dan saat pembuatan laporan pertanggungjawaban. Bahkan pada saat pembangunan sudah selesaipun penelitian hukum masih sangat diperlukan dalam rangka mengevaluasi kegiatan fisik maupun sumber daya manusia dengan menggunan prosedur yang sudah ditentukan.
{"title":"KAJIAN TENTANG MANFAAT PENELITIAN HUKUM BAGI PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH","authors":"Pm. Agus Santoso","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V3I2.177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V3I2.177","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian hukum adalah sebuah kegiatan ilmiah dalam rangka mengembangkan ilmu pengetahuan hukum dan untuk mengetahu beberapa kasus atau masalah pada semua kegiatan, termasuk masalah-masalah yang sedang berkembang dibeberapa daerah. Penelitian hukum terdiri dari dua jenis, yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empiris. \u0000Penelitian hukum normatif adalah sebuiah penelitian mengenai prinsisp-prinsip, sistematika, sinkronisasi, sejarah dan perbandingan hukum yang menggunakan data primer berupa perundang-undangan dan data sekunder berbentuk literatur. Penelitian hukum empiris sosiologis terdiri dari penelitian indentifikasi hukum tidak tertulis dan penelitian keefektian bekerjanya hukum dilapangan atau pada masyarakat, yang menggunakan data primer berupa gejala sosial pada masyarakat, dan data sekunder dalam bentuk peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur. \u0000Penelitian hukum sangat diperlukan dalam rangka pembangunan daerah, mulai dari perencanaan, pada saat pelaksanaan proyek sampai selesai, dan saat pembuatan laporan pertanggungjawaban. Bahkan pada saat pembangunan sudah selesaipun penelitian hukum masih sangat diperlukan dalam rangka mengevaluasi kegiatan fisik maupun sumber daya manusia dengan menggunan prosedur yang sudah ditentukan.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":" 55","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114053106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peneltian ini memberikan perhatian pada peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang sebagai lembaga yang dibentuk untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap kepentingan dan masa depan anak korban kekerasan seksual. Penelitian ini mengambil rumusan masalah Peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terhadap anak sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual, kendala yang dihadapi dan upaya yang dilakukan P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terhadap anak sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Penelitian ini merupakan peneltian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan empiris yang dianalisa secara deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, dapat diketahui bahwa keberadaan P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang bisa memberikan pengaruh penting guna meminimalisir kasus kekerasan seksual yang terjadi di Kabupaten Malang. Peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terdiri dari 2 bentuk yakni secara litigasi dan nonlitigasi. Secara litigasi, berjalan baik tetapi belum maksimal dikarenakan belum tersedianya sumber daya manusia yang memadai atau belum mempunyai keahlian di bidang litigasi. Sedangkan secara non litigasi, bentuk pelayanan yang diberikan terdiri dari dampingan psikologi spiritual, konseling dan mediasi. Sejauh ini layanan nonlitigasi sudah sangat baik dan mendapat dukungan dari masyarakat. Adapun bentuk – bentuk hambatan yang dihadapi ialah belum didukungnya sumber dana dan sumber daya manusia yang memadai dan faktor budaya masyarakat yang masih memandang bahwa permasalahan yang menimpa keluarga mereka merupakan masalah internal yang tidak perlu melibatkan orang luar. Upaya untuk mengatasi hambatan telah dilakukan dengan melakukan pendekatan dan koordinasi dengan instansi daerah terkait dan melakukan sosialisasi atau penyuluhan kepada masyarakat. Melihat kenyataan ini, disarankan kepada pemerintah daerah untuk menjadikan isu perlindungan anak korban kekerasan seksual menjadi prioritas pembangunan yang termasuk didanai oleh APBD dan kepada lembaga P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dapat lebih mengoptimalkan program – program yang menjadi prioritas kegiatannya.
{"title":"“PERAN PUSAT PELAYANAN TERPADU PEMBERDAYAAN PEREMPUAN DAN ANAK (P2TP2A) KABUPATEN MALANG DALAM MEMBERIKAN LAYANAN ADVOKASI KORBAN KHUSUSNYA TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL”","authors":"Ratih Dwi Anggraini Pk","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v8i2.157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v8i2.157","url":null,"abstract":"Peneltian ini memberikan perhatian pada peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang sebagai lembaga yang dibentuk untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap kepentingan dan masa depan anak korban kekerasan seksual. Penelitian ini mengambil rumusan masalah Peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terhadap anak sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual, kendala yang dihadapi dan upaya yang dilakukan P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terhadap anak sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Penelitian ini merupakan peneltian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan empiris yang dianalisa secara deskriptif kualitatif. \u0000 Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, dapat diketahui bahwa keberadaan P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang bisa memberikan pengaruh penting guna meminimalisir kasus kekerasan seksual yang terjadi di Kabupaten Malang. Peran P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dalam memberikan layanan advokasi korban terdiri dari 2 bentuk yakni secara litigasi dan nonlitigasi. Secara litigasi, berjalan baik tetapi belum maksimal dikarenakan belum tersedianya sumber daya manusia yang memadai atau belum mempunyai keahlian di bidang litigasi. Sedangkan secara non litigasi, bentuk pelayanan yang diberikan terdiri dari dampingan psikologi spiritual, konseling dan mediasi. Sejauh ini layanan nonlitigasi sudah sangat baik dan mendapat dukungan dari masyarakat. Adapun bentuk – bentuk hambatan yang dihadapi ialah belum didukungnya sumber dana dan sumber daya manusia yang memadai dan faktor budaya masyarakat yang masih memandang bahwa permasalahan yang menimpa keluarga mereka merupakan masalah internal yang tidak perlu melibatkan orang luar. Upaya untuk mengatasi hambatan telah dilakukan dengan melakukan pendekatan dan koordinasi dengan instansi daerah terkait dan melakukan sosialisasi atau penyuluhan kepada masyarakat. \u0000 Melihat kenyataan ini, disarankan kepada pemerintah daerah untuk menjadikan isu perlindungan anak korban kekerasan seksual menjadi prioritas pembangunan yang termasuk didanai oleh APBD dan kepada lembaga P2TP2A Kabupaten Malang dapat lebih mengoptimalkan program – program yang menjadi prioritas kegiatannya.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125967339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：