Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.
{"title":"Living Alone and Feelings of Depression Among Adults Age 18 and Older.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 199","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives-Emergency operations plans that are specific to or include response to pandemics, approaches to implement the plans, and related infection control policies and practices vary among residential care communities (RCCs). This report presents nationally representative percentages of RCCs with infection control programs by selected characteristics. Methods-Data are from the RCC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study asked four binary questions, including whether the RCC had a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response, had a designated staff member or consultant responsible for coordinating the infection control program, offered annual influenza vaccination to residents, and offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff. RCC characteristics presented in this report are bed size, chain affiliation, ownership status, and provision of dementia-specific care (RCCs that only served residents with dementia or had a dementia wing). Metropolitan statistical area (MSA) was used to characterize geographic location. Results-Most RCCs reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response. A higher percentage of RCCs with more than 26 beds and those with a designated space for dementia care reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan and a designated staff to coordinate an infection control program. The largest differences were observed in the provision of annual influenza vaccination to residents and to all employees or contract staff by MSA status, bed size, and presence of a designated space for dementia care. A higher percentage of RCCs in non-MSAs (83.4%), RCCs with a designated space for dementia care (95.0%), those with more than 50 beds (93.9%), those with 26-50 beds (93.3%), and those with nonprofit ownership (85.8%) offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff.
{"title":"Infection Control Policies and Practices in Residential Care Communities by Selected Organizational and Geographic Characteristics: United States, 2020.","authors":"Amanuel Melekin, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Emergency operations plans that are specific to or include response to pandemics, approaches to implement the plans, and related infection control policies and practices vary among residential care communities (RCCs). This report presents nationally representative percentages of RCCs with infection control programs by selected characteristics. Methods-Data are from the RCC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study asked four binary questions, including whether the RCC had a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response, had a designated staff member or consultant responsible for coordinating the infection control program, offered annual influenza vaccination to residents, and offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff. RCC characteristics presented in this report are bed size, chain affiliation, ownership status, and provision of dementia-specific care (RCCs that only served residents with dementia or had a dementia wing). Metropolitan statistical area (MSA) was used to characterize geographic location. Results-Most RCCs reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response. A higher percentage of RCCs with more than 26 beds and those with a designated space for dementia care reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan and a designated staff to coordinate an infection control program. The largest differences were observed in the provision of annual influenza vaccination to residents and to all employees or contract staff by MSA status, bed size, and presence of a designated space for dementia care. A higher percentage of RCCs in non-MSAs (83.4%), RCCs with a designated space for dementia care (95.0%), those with more than 50 beds (93.9%), those with 26-50 beds (93.3%), and those with nonprofit ownership (85.8%) offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 200","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.
{"title":"Living Alone and Feelings of Depression Among Adults Age 18 and Older.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"10.15620/cdc:136451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:136451","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":"878 20","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140467496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.
{"title":"Alzheimer Disease or Other Dementias in Adult Day Services Centers, 2020.","authors":"Priyanka Singh, J. Lendon, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"10.15620/cdc:135024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:135024","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":"33 2","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140524026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose-This report describes trends in emergency department visits among people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2021, by health insurance status and selected demographic and hospital characteristics. Methods-Estimates in this report are based on data collected in the 2010-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Data were weighted to produce annual national estimates. Patient and hospital characteristics are presented by primary expected source of payment. Results-Private insurance and Medicaid were the most common primary expected sources of payment at emergency department visits by people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2013. Medicaid was the most common primary expected source of payment from 2014 through 2021. Among children younger than age 18 years, the most common primary expected source of payment was Medicaid across the entire period. The percentage of visits by children with no insurance decreased from 7.4% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2021. Among adults, the percentage of visits with Medicaid increased from 25.5% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021, and the percentage of visits by those with no insurance decreased from 24.6% to 11.1% during this period. Among Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people, Medicaid was the most frequent primary expected source of payment during the entire period. Among White non-Hispanic people, private insurance was the most frequent primary expected source of payment through 2015, while private insurance and Medicaid were the most frequent primary expected sources of payment from 2016 through 2021.
{"title":"Trends in Emergency Department Visits Among People Younger Than Age 65 by Insurance Status: United States, 2010-2021.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Susan M Schappert, Jill J Ashman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose-This report describes trends in emergency department visits among people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2021, by health insurance status and selected demographic and hospital characteristics. Methods-Estimates in this report are based on data collected in the 2010-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Data were weighted to produce annual national estimates. Patient and hospital characteristics are presented by primary expected source of payment. Results-Private insurance and Medicaid were the most common primary expected sources of payment at emergency department visits by people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2013. Medicaid was the most common primary expected source of payment from 2014 through 2021. Among children younger than age 18 years, the most common primary expected source of payment was Medicaid across the entire period. The percentage of visits by children with no insurance decreased from 7.4% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2021. Among adults, the percentage of visits with Medicaid increased from 25.5% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021, and the percentage of visits by those with no insurance decreased from 24.6% to 11.1% during this period. Among Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people, Medicaid was the most frequent primary expected source of payment during the entire period. Among White non-Hispanic people, private insurance was the most frequent primary expected source of payment through 2015, while private insurance and Medicaid were the most frequent primary expected sources of payment from 2016 through 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 197","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139513170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Priyanka Singh, Jessica P Lendon, Manisha Sengupta
Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.
{"title":"Alzheimer Disease or Other Dementias in Adult Day Services Centers, 2020.","authors":"Priyanka Singh, Jessica P Lendon, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 198","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective-This report describes methods of contraception ever used by U.S. women ages 15-49 who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Discontinuation of selected contraceptive methods is also described. Methods-This report focuses on information collected from the 11,695 women ages 15-49 interviewed in the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. Most estimates shown are based on data on contraceptive methods ever used by the 10,122 interviewed women who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Results-Based on 2015-2019 data, virtually all women of reproductive age who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner used at least one contraceptive method at some point in their life up to the time of interview (99.2%, or 63.2 million women ages 15-49), including 87.8% who had ever used a "most or moderately effective reversible method": the pill, an injectable, contraceptive patch, contraceptive ring, contraceptive implant, or intrauterine device. Most women had used the male condom with a partner (94.5%), the pill (79.8%), or withdrawal (65.7%). About one in four women reported ever using long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine device or contraceptive implant) (24.9%) or emergency contraception (23.5%). The type of methods ever used varied by Hispanic origin and race, nativity among Hispanic women, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Among women who had ever discontinued use of the pill or intrauterine devices due to dissatisfaction (and not for seeking a pregnancy), side effects were the most common reason.
{"title":"Contraceptive Methods Women Have Ever Used:United States, 2015-2019.","authors":"Kimberly Daniels, Joyce C Abma","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective-This report describes methods of contraception ever used by U.S. women ages 15-49 who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Discontinuation of selected contraceptive methods is also described. Methods-This report focuses on information collected from the 11,695 women ages 15-49 interviewed in the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. Most estimates shown are based on data on contraceptive methods ever used by the 10,122 interviewed women who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Results-Based on 2015-2019 data, virtually all women of reproductive age who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner used at least one contraceptive method at some point in their life up to the time of interview (99.2%, or 63.2 million women ages 15-49), including 87.8% who had ever used a \"most or moderately effective reversible method\": the pill, an injectable, contraceptive patch, contraceptive ring, contraceptive implant, or intrauterine device. Most women had used the male condom with a partner (94.5%), the pill (79.8%), or withdrawal (65.7%). About one in four women reported ever using long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine device or contraceptive implant) (24.9%) or emergency contraception (23.5%). The type of methods ever used varied by Hispanic origin and race, nativity among Hispanic women, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Among women who had ever discontinued use of the pill or intrauterine devices due to dissatisfaction (and not for seeking a pregnancy), side effects were the most common reason.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 195","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139087560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective-This report presents national estimates of sexual activity and contraceptive use among males and females ages 15-19 in the United States, based on data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods-NSFG data were collected through in-person interviews with nationally representative samples of males and females ages 15-49 in the household population of the United States. NSFG 2015-2019 interviews were conducted between September 2015 and September 2019 with 21,441 males and females, including 3,812 teenagers (1,894 females and 1,918 males ages 15-19). Estimates include measures of sexual experience and contraceptive use as well as circumstances of first sexual intercourse (sex), attitudes, and probability of a birth during the teen years. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, age group, parental living arrangements, and maternal characteristics. The report focuses on the period 2015-2019, with trends shown for selected measures for time points 2002, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2015-2019. Results-In 2015-2019, 40.5% of never-married female teenagers (3.8 million), and 38.7% of never-married male teenagers (3.8 million) had ever had vaginal intercourse with an opposite-sex partner. For females this percentage was stable across the four time points, but for males this percentage decreased from the 2002 (45.7%) and 2011-2015 (44.2%) time points. For teen males, use of any contraception at first sex increased across the four time points, from 82.0% in 2002 to 92.1% in 2015-2019, while no consistent trend was seen for teen females. Nearly four out of five female teenagers (77.3%) in 2015-2019 used a method of contraception at first sex. Among female teenagers, ever-use of long-acting reversible contraception, which includes intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, increased from 5.8% to 19.2% from 2011-2015 to 2015-2019.
{"title":"Teenagers in the United States: Sexual Activity,Contraceptive Use, and Childbearing, 2015-2019.","authors":"Joyce C Abma, Gladys M Martinez","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective-This report presents national estimates of sexual activity and contraceptive use among males and females ages 15-19 in the United States, based on data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods-NSFG data were collected through in-person interviews with nationally representative samples of males and females ages 15-49 in the household population of the United States. NSFG 2015-2019 interviews were conducted between September 2015 and September 2019 with 21,441 males and females, including 3,812 teenagers (1,894 females and 1,918 males ages 15-19). Estimates include measures of sexual experience and contraceptive use as well as circumstances of first sexual intercourse (sex), attitudes, and probability of a birth during the teen years. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, age group, parental living arrangements, and maternal characteristics. The report focuses on the period 2015-2019, with trends shown for selected measures for time points 2002, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2015-2019. Results-In 2015-2019, 40.5% of never-married female teenagers (3.8 million), and 38.7% of never-married male teenagers (3.8 million) had ever had vaginal intercourse with an opposite-sex partner. For females this percentage was stable across the four time points, but for males this percentage decreased from the 2002 (45.7%) and 2011-2015 (44.2%) time points. For teen males, use of any contraception at first sex increased across the four time points, from 82.0% in 2002 to 92.1% in 2015-2019, while no consistent trend was seen for teen females. Nearly four out of five female teenagers (77.3%) in 2015-2019 used a method of contraception at first sex. Among female teenagers, ever-use of long-acting reversible contraception, which includes intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, increased from 5.8% to 19.2% from 2011-2015 to 2015-2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 196","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139087561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amanda E Ng, Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, Kristen Cibelli Hibben
Objective-Previous work has established life satisfaction as an important indicator of overall health and well-being. This report describes differences in life dissatisfaction by selected characteristics, grouped by family income. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the percentage of adults that were dissatisfied with life by selected demographic characteristics (age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and nativity status [born in the United States or U.S. territory]), grouped by family income. Results-In 2021, 4.8% of adults were dissatisfied with life. In general, analyses showed significant differences by all selected demographic characteristics among adults with incomes of less than 200% of the federal poverty level. Among this group, men, adults ages 45-64, White non-Hispanic adults, Black non-Hispanic adults, and adults born in the United States were more likely to be dissatisfied with life compared with their counterparts. No significant differences in life dissatisfaction by selected demographic characteristics among adults with incomes greater than 200% of the federal poverty level were observed. Conclusion-This report presents estimates of life dissatisfaction among adults by demographic subgroups and family income. These results highlight the importance of monitoring life dissatisfaction among detailed subgroups grouped by income, in addition to the overall national estimate.
{"title":"Demographic Differences in Life Dissatisfaction Among Adults: United States, 2021.","authors":"Amanda E Ng, Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, Kristen Cibelli Hibben","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective-Previous work has established life satisfaction as an important indicator of overall health and well-being. This report describes differences in life dissatisfaction by selected characteristics, grouped by family income. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the percentage of adults that were dissatisfied with life by selected demographic characteristics (age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and nativity status [born in the United States or U.S. territory]), grouped by family income. Results-In 2021, 4.8% of adults were dissatisfied with life. In general, analyses showed significant differences by all selected demographic characteristics among adults with incomes of less than 200% of the federal poverty level. Among this group, men, adults ages 45-64, White non-Hispanic adults, Black non-Hispanic adults, and adults born in the United States were more likely to be dissatisfied with life compared with their counterparts. No significant differences in life dissatisfaction by selected demographic characteristics among adults with incomes greater than 200% of the federal poverty level were observed. Conclusion-This report presents estimates of life dissatisfaction among adults by demographic subgroups and family income. These results highlight the importance of monitoring life dissatisfaction among detailed subgroups grouped by income, in addition to the overall national estimate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 192","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71483823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives-This report presents state, regional, and national estimates of the percentage of people who were uninsured, had private health insurance coverage, and had public health insurance coverage at the time of the interview. Methods-Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate health insurance coverage. Estimates were categorized by age group, state Medicaid expansion status, urbanization level, expanded region, and state. Estimates by state Medicaid expansion status, urbanization level, and expanded region were based on data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. State estimates are shown for 32 states and the District of Columbia for people younger than age 65 and adults ages 18-64, and 27 states for children. Results-In 2022, among people younger than age 65, 10.2% were uninsured, 64.0% had private coverage, and 28.2% had public coverage at the time of the interview. Among adults ages 18-64, the percentage who were uninsured ranged from 10.1% for those living in large fringe (suburban) metropolitan counties to 13.9% for both those living in nonmetropolitan counties and large central metropolitan counties. Adults ages 18-64 living in non-Medicaid expansion states were twice as likely to be uninsured (19.6%) compared with those living in Medicaid expansion states (9.1%). A similar pattern was observed among children ages 0-17 years. The percentage of adults ages 18-64 who were uninsured was significantly higher than the national average (12.4%) in Florida (17.9%), Georgia (21.2%), Tennessee (21.6%), and Texas (27.0%), and significantly lower than the national average in Maryland (7.0%), Massachusetts (3.0%), Michigan (6.5%), New York (5.6%), Ohio (8.6%), Pennsylvania (7.2%), Virginia (8.5%), Washington (7.3%), and Wisconsin (7.0%). The percentage of people younger than age 65 who were uninsured was lowest in the New England region (3.5%).
{"title":"Geographic Variation in Health Insurance Coverage:United States, 2022.","authors":"Emily P Terlizzi, Robin A Cohen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report presents state, regional, and national estimates of the percentage of people who were uninsured, had private health insurance coverage, and had public health insurance coverage at the time of the interview. Methods-Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate health insurance coverage. Estimates were categorized by age group, state Medicaid expansion status, urbanization level, expanded region, and state. Estimates by state Medicaid expansion status, urbanization level, and expanded region were based on data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. State estimates are shown for 32 states and the District of Columbia for people younger than age 65 and adults ages 18-64, and 27 states for children. Results-In 2022, among people younger than age 65, 10.2% were uninsured, 64.0% had private coverage, and 28.2% had public coverage at the time of the interview. Among adults ages 18-64, the percentage who were uninsured ranged from 10.1% for those living in large fringe (suburban) metropolitan counties to 13.9% for both those living in nonmetropolitan counties and large central metropolitan counties. Adults ages 18-64 living in non-Medicaid expansion states were twice as likely to be uninsured (19.6%) compared with those living in Medicaid expansion states (9.1%). A similar pattern was observed among children ages 0-17 years. The percentage of adults ages 18-64 who were uninsured was significantly higher than the national average (12.4%) in Florida (17.9%), Georgia (21.2%), Tennessee (21.6%), and Texas (27.0%), and significantly lower than the national average in Maryland (7.0%), Massachusetts (3.0%), Michigan (6.5%), New York (5.6%), Ohio (8.6%), Pennsylvania (7.2%), Virginia (8.5%), Washington (7.3%), and Wisconsin (7.0%). The percentage of people younger than age 65 who were uninsured was lowest in the New England region (3.5%).</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 194","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138482676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}