Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1177/13524585241272046
Maria Petracca, Serena Ruggieri, Riccardo Nistri, Ilaria Tomasso, Elena Barbuti, Valeria Pozzilli, Shalom Haggiag, Carla Tortorella, Claudio Gasperini, Carlo Pozzilli, Luca Prosperini
Background: A latent period of variable length elapses between multiple sclerosis (MS) biological onset and the occurrence of the first clinical episode reflecting a central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating event. Factors affecting the duration of such interval are unknown.
Objective: To explore whether brain reserve, which moderates the impact of structural damage along MS course, could also affect the timing of MS clinical onset.
Methods: We conducted a time-to-event analysis in 326 relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis patients to ascertain the effect of brain reserve, that is, larger maximal lifetime brain growth (MLBG) estimated as intracranial volume, on the risk of an earlier disease onset. For this purpose, we carried out a Cox proportional hazards regression model stratified by sex and adjusted by site and pre-morbid MS risk factors. All patients reached the event (i.e. the disease onset) with no censored case; the age (years) at disease onset was set as the main time variable.
Results: We identified a protective effect of brain reserve on the time to disease onset (HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02-0.83, p = 0.032), unchanged when accounting for MS risk factors.
Conclusion: Brain reserve might counteract the pathological mechanisms ongoing after biological initiation, thus delaying the disease overt clinical manifestation.
背景:从多发性硬化症(MS)生物学发病到反映中枢神经系统(CNS)脱髓鞘事件的首次临床发作之间,存在一段长短不一的潜伏期。影响这一间歇期持续时间的因素尚不清楚:目的:探讨大脑储备是否也会影响多发性硬化症临床发病的时间:方法:我们对 326 名复发型多发性硬化症患者进行了时间到事件分析,以确定脑储备(即以颅内容积估算的终生最大脑生长量(MLBG))对提前发病风险的影响。为此,我们建立了一个按性别分层的考克斯比例危险回归模型,并根据发病部位和发病前多发性硬化症的危险因素进行了调整。所有患者都达到了发病年龄(即发病时间),没有删减病例;发病时的年龄(岁)被设定为主要时间变量:结果:我们发现脑储备对发病时间具有保护作用(HR = 0.11,95% CI = 0.02-0.83,p = 0.032),在考虑多发性硬化症风险因素后,该作用保持不变:结论:脑储备可抵消生物起病后的病理机制,从而推迟疾病的明显临床表现。
{"title":"Brain reserve and timing of clinical onset in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Maria Petracca, Serena Ruggieri, Riccardo Nistri, Ilaria Tomasso, Elena Barbuti, Valeria Pozzilli, Shalom Haggiag, Carla Tortorella, Claudio Gasperini, Carlo Pozzilli, Luca Prosperini","doi":"10.1177/13524585241272046","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241272046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A latent period of variable length elapses between multiple sclerosis (MS) biological onset and the occurrence of the first clinical episode reflecting a central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating event. Factors affecting the duration of such interval are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore whether brain reserve, which moderates the impact of structural damage along MS course, could also affect the timing of MS clinical onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a time-to-event analysis in 326 relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis patients to ascertain the effect of brain reserve, that is, larger maximal lifetime brain growth (MLBG) estimated as intracranial volume, on the risk of an earlier disease onset. For this purpose, we carried out a Cox proportional hazards regression model stratified by sex and adjusted by site and pre-morbid MS risk factors. All patients reached the event (i.e. the disease onset) with no censored case; the age (years) at disease onset was set as the main time variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a protective effect of brain reserve on the time to disease onset (HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02-0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.032), unchanged when accounting for MS risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brain reserve might counteract the pathological mechanisms ongoing after biological initiation, thus delaying the disease overt clinical manifestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-16DOI: 10.1177/13524585241261199
Martin Klein
{"title":"Monitoring cognitive functioning in MS will trigger anxiety in patients: No.","authors":"Martin Klein","doi":"10.1177/13524585241261199","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241261199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1177/13524585241265961
Bruce Bebo, Tim Coetzee, Emma Gray, Anne Helme, Pamela Kanellis, Douglas Landsman, Michaela Mai, Beatriz Martinez de la Cruz, Julia Morahan, Emmanuelle Plassart, Baylee Pickrell, Sarah Rawlings, Lasse Skovgaard, Paola Zaratin, Lindsay Rechtman
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated central nervous system disorder and a growing global health challenge affecting nearly 3 million people worldwide. Incidence and prevalence continue to increase with no known cause or cure. Globally governments and non-profit organizations fund research toward better understanding of and treatments for multiple sclerosis.
Methods: This study identified MS research projects funded between 2021 and 2023 by government and non-profit organization sources. Projects were described by type of scientific approach, Pathways to Cure research category (i.e. Stop, Restore, End), and other key characteristics.
Results: Over 2,300 MS research projects were identified through 16 non-profit MS organizations and 18 government databases. The overall global portfolio of these projects is valued at nearly one and a half billion Euros. The majority of projects were classified in the Stop category (60%). Research collaboration occurs in many forms among the research community; around 272 projects were reported to be co-funded.
Conclusion: Global MS research collaboration will accelerate progress toward increased knowledge, effective treatments, improved health outcomes, and ultimately cures for MS. This landscape analysis highlights the current distribution of MS research investment between topics and begins to suggest where the MS community should focus to increase potential impact for current and future endeavors.
{"title":"The first global landscape analysis of multiple sclerosis research funding.","authors":"Bruce Bebo, Tim Coetzee, Emma Gray, Anne Helme, Pamela Kanellis, Douglas Landsman, Michaela Mai, Beatriz Martinez de la Cruz, Julia Morahan, Emmanuelle Plassart, Baylee Pickrell, Sarah Rawlings, Lasse Skovgaard, Paola Zaratin, Lindsay Rechtman","doi":"10.1177/13524585241265961","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241265961","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated central nervous system disorder and a growing global health challenge affecting nearly 3 million people worldwide. Incidence and prevalence continue to increase with no known cause or cure. Globally governments and non-profit organizations fund research toward better understanding of and treatments for multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study identified MS research projects funded between 2021 and 2023 by government and non-profit organization sources. Projects were described by type of scientific approach, Pathways to Cure research category (i.e. Stop, Restore, End), and other key characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2,300 MS research projects were identified through 16 non-profit MS organizations and 18 government databases. The overall global portfolio of these projects is valued at nearly one and a half billion Euros. The majority of projects were classified in the Stop category (60%). Research collaboration occurs in many forms among the research community; around 272 projects were reported to be co-funded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Global MS research collaboration will accelerate progress toward increased knowledge, effective treatments, improved health outcomes, and ultimately cures for MS. This landscape analysis highlights the current distribution of MS research investment between topics and begins to suggest where the MS community should focus to increase potential impact for current and future endeavors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457431/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1177/13524585241273084
Giulia Ciccarese, Aurora Zanghì, Astrid Herzum, Cristian Fidanzi, Maria Parodi, Francesco Drago
{"title":"Acute urticaria following ofatumumab injection for multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Giulia Ciccarese, Aurora Zanghì, Astrid Herzum, Cristian Fidanzi, Maria Parodi, Francesco Drago","doi":"10.1177/13524585241273084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241273084","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142056063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1177/13524585241258691
Qiqi Zhang, Alastair J Noyce, John Robson, Gavin Giovannoni, Charles R Marshall, Ruth Dobson
Background: Conflicting data exist around oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective: To use routinely collected primary healthcare data to explore the potential association between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS in females at population level.
Methods: We performed a nested case-control study using electronic primary care data, with complete electronic ascertainment from 1990. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between contraceptive exposure and MS, without and with adjusting for age, ethnicity and deprivation.
Results: A total of 4455 females were included: 891 cases and 3564 controls. No association was seen between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS, or between any contraceptive, combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or progesterone-only pill (POP) use 0-2, 2-5 or >5 years prior to MS. Conclusions: In the largest population-based study to date, we find no evidence of an association between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS diagnosis.
{"title":"No association between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS: A population-based nested case-control study in primary care.","authors":"Qiqi Zhang, Alastair J Noyce, John Robson, Gavin Giovannoni, Charles R Marshall, Ruth Dobson","doi":"10.1177/13524585241258691","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241258691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conflicting data exist around oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use routinely collected primary healthcare data to explore the potential association between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS in females at population level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a nested case-control study using electronic primary care data, with complete electronic ascertainment from 1990. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between contraceptive exposure and MS, without and with adjusting for age, ethnicity and deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4455 females were included: 891 cases and 3564 controls. No association was seen between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS, or between any contraceptive, combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or progesterone-only pill (POP) use 0-2, 2-5 or >5 years prior to MS. Conclusions: In the largest population-based study to date, we find no evidence of an association between oral contraceptive exposure and subsequent MS diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141321260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are at risk of concurrently using multiple central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, yet the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy remains unmeasured in pwMS.
Objective: The objective is to measure the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy in pwMS.
Methods: This serial, cross-sectional study measured CNS-active polypharmacy in people with MS in the United States from 2008 to 2021 using insurance claims data. CNS-active polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent prescription of ⩾3 CNS-active drugs for >30 continuous days. CNS-active drugs included antidepressants, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics, opioids, and skeletal muscle relaxants.
Results: The number of subjects included at each time point ranged from 23,917 subjects in 2008 to 55,797 subjects in 2021. In 2021, subjects with CNS-active polypharmacy were more likely to be 46-65 years of age and have CNS-related comorbidities compared to those without CNS-active polypharmacy. From 2008 to 2021, the age-adjusted prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy among female subjects increased from 19.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 19.1-20.4) to 26.4% (95% CI = 25.9-26.8) versus 15.9% (95% CI = 14.8-17.0) to 18.6% (95% CI = 17.9-19.2) in male subjects.
Conclusion: The prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy has increased among people with MS with a growing disparity by sex.
背景:多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)有同时使用多种中枢神经系统(CNS)活性药物的风险,但中枢神经系统活性多种药物在多发性硬化症患者中的使用率仍未得到测量:目的:测量中枢神经系统活性药物的使用率:这项连续性横断面研究使用保险理赔数据测量了 2008 年至 2021 年美国多发性硬化症患者的中枢神经系统活性多重药物治疗情况。中枢神经系统活性药物的定义是同时处方 ⩾3 种中枢神经系统活性药物,且连续处方时间超过 30 天。中枢神经系统活性药物包括抗抑郁药、抗癫痫药、抗精神病药、苯二氮卓类药物、非苯二氮卓类苯二氮卓受体激动剂催眠药、阿片类药物和骨骼肌松弛剂:每个时间点纳入的受试者人数从 2008 年的 23,917 人到 2021 年的 55,797 人不等。与未使用中枢神经系统活性多种药物的受试者相比,2021 年使用中枢神经系统活性多种药物的受试者更有可能年龄在 46-65 岁之间,并患有中枢神经系统相关的合并症。从2008年到2021年,经年龄调整后,女性受试者中中枢神经系统活性多种药物的流行率从19.8%(95%置信区间(CI)=19.1-20.4)增加到26.4%(95% CI = 25.9-26.8),而男性受试者中中枢神经系统活性多种药物的流行率从15.9%(95% CI = 14.8-17.0)增加到18.6%(95% CI = 17.9-19.2):结论:中枢神经系统活性药物的使用率在多发性硬化症患者中有所上升,且性别差异越来越大。
{"title":"Trends in central nervous system-active polypharmacy among people with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Hayden Naizer, Joseph Wozny, Trudy Millard Krause, Ethan Huson, Leorah Freeman","doi":"10.1177/13524585241251986","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241251986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are at risk of concurrently using multiple central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, yet the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy remains unmeasured in pwMS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to measure the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy in pwMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This serial, cross-sectional study measured CNS-active polypharmacy in people with MS in the United States from 2008 to 2021 using insurance claims data. CNS-active polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent prescription of ⩾3 CNS-active drugs for >30 continuous days. CNS-active drugs included antidepressants, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics, opioids, and skeletal muscle relaxants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of subjects included at each time point ranged from 23,917 subjects in 2008 to 55,797 subjects in 2021. In 2021, subjects with CNS-active polypharmacy were more likely to be 46-65 years of age and have CNS-related comorbidities compared to those without CNS-active polypharmacy. From 2008 to 2021, the age-adjusted prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy among female subjects increased from 19.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 19.1-20.4) to 26.4% (95% CI = 25.9-26.8) versus 15.9% (95% CI = 14.8-17.0) to 18.6% (95% CI = 17.9-19.2) in male subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy has increased among people with MS with a growing disparity by sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363472/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140945537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-03-08DOI: 10.1177/13524585241228103
Jan Hillert, Riley Bove, Lisa B Haddad, Kerstin Hellwig, Maria Houtchens, Melinda Magyari, Gabriele S Merki-Feld, Scott Montgomery, Rossella E Nappi, Egon Stenager, Heidi Thompson, Zeliha Tulek, Elisabetta Verdun Di Cantogno, Manuela Simoni
Background: Current guidance on the selection of appropriate contraception for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is lacking.
Objective: To address this gap, an expert-led consensus program developed recommendations to support clinicians in discussing family planning and contraception with women and men with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) of 13 international clinical experts led the program, supported by an extended faculty of 32 experts representing 18 countries. A modified Delphi methodology was used for decision-making and consensus-building. The SC drafted 15 clinical questions focused on patient-centered care, selection of contraception, and timing of stopping/starting contraception and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Statements addressing each question were drafted based on evaluation of published evidence and the experts' clinical experience. Consensus was reached if ⩾75% of respondents agreed (scoring 7-9 on a 9-point scale) with each recommendation.
Results: Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 proposed recommendations, including how and when to discuss contraception, types and safety of contraceptives, and how to evaluate the most appropriate contraceptive options for specific patient groups, including those with significant disability or being treated with DMTs.
Conclusion: These expert recommendations provide the first practical, relevant, and comprehensive guidance for clinicians on the selection of contraception in PwMS.
{"title":"Expert opinion on the use of contraception in people with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Jan Hillert, Riley Bove, Lisa B Haddad, Kerstin Hellwig, Maria Houtchens, Melinda Magyari, Gabriele S Merki-Feld, Scott Montgomery, Rossella E Nappi, Egon Stenager, Heidi Thompson, Zeliha Tulek, Elisabetta Verdun Di Cantogno, Manuela Simoni","doi":"10.1177/13524585241228103","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241228103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidance on the selection of appropriate contraception for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address this gap, an expert-led consensus program developed recommendations to support clinicians in discussing family planning and contraception with women and men with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) of 13 international clinical experts led the program, supported by an extended faculty of 32 experts representing 18 countries. A modified Delphi methodology was used for decision-making and consensus-building. The SC drafted 15 clinical questions focused on patient-centered care, selection of contraception, and timing of stopping/starting contraception and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Statements addressing each question were drafted based on evaluation of published evidence and the experts' clinical experience. Consensus was reached if ⩾75% of respondents agreed (scoring 7-9 on a 9-point scale) with each recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 proposed recommendations, including how and when to discuss contraception, types and safety of contraceptives, and how to evaluate the most appropriate contraceptive options for specific patient groups, including those with significant disability or being treated with DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These expert recommendations provide the first practical, relevant, and comprehensive guidance for clinicians on the selection of contraception in PwMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363471/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140059954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1177/13524585241267257
Gabriel Bsteh, Harald Hegen, Nik Krajnc, Fabian Föttinger, Patrick Altmann, Michael Auer, Klaus Berek, Barbara Kornek, Fritz Leutmezer, Stefan Macher, Tobias Monschein, Markus Ponleitner, Paulus Rommer, Christiane Schmied, Karin Zebenholzer, Gudrun Zulehner, Tobias Zrzavy, Florian Deisenhammer, Franziska Di Pauli, Berthold Pemp, Thomas Berger
Background: Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Methods: From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFLbaseline/aLpRNFLrebaseline) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPLbaseline/aLGCIPLrebaseline) by mixed-effects linear regression models.
Results: We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFLbaseline and aLGCIPLbaseline significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, p < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, p < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFLrebaseline nor aLGCIPLrebaseline was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFLrebaseline (by 0.31%, p < 0.001) and aLGCIPLrebaseline (0.25%, p < 0.001) compared with M-DMT.
Conclusions: Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity.
{"title":"Retinal layer thinning for monitoring disease-modifying treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis-Evidence for applying a rebaselining concept.","authors":"Gabriel Bsteh, Harald Hegen, Nik Krajnc, Fabian Föttinger, Patrick Altmann, Michael Auer, Klaus Berek, Barbara Kornek, Fritz Leutmezer, Stefan Macher, Tobias Monschein, Markus Ponleitner, Paulus Rommer, Christiane Schmied, Karin Zebenholzer, Gudrun Zulehner, Tobias Zrzavy, Florian Deisenhammer, Franziska Di Pauli, Berthold Pemp, Thomas Berger","doi":"10.1177/13524585241267257","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13524585241267257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFL<sub>baseline</sub>/aLpRNFL<sub>rebaseline</sub>) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPL<sub>baseline</sub>/aLGCIPL<sub>rebaseline</sub>) by mixed-effects linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFL<sub>baseline</sub> and aLGCIPL<sub>baseline</sub> significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFL<sub>rebaseline</sub> nor aLGCIPL<sub>rebaseline</sub> was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFL<sub>rebaseline</sub> (by 0.31%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and aLGCIPL<sub>rebaseline</sub> (0.25%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with M-DMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}