Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-14DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01975-y
Sopany Saing, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Astrid Schut, Thea van Asselt, Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Margien G S Boels, Naomi Tramper, Clara van Ofwegen-Hanekamp, Robert Willemsen, Michelle M A Kip, Hendrik Koffijberg
Introduction: In 2018, the Dutch CardioVascular Alliance (DCVA), a collaboration between 24 partners in the cardiovascular field, expressed the ambition to reduce the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden in the Netherlands by 25% in 2030. This project aimed to evaluate the extent to which the activities within the DCVA contribute to a reduction in the burden defined as morbidity and mortality combined.
Methods: The role and potential impact of the DCVA was assessed. Three assessments were conducted: 1) to determine the potential impact of consortia (n = 32) using a checklist; 2) to estimate the potential health benefit (quality-adjusted life years, (QALYs)) and cost savings from a snapshot of consortia (n = 4).
Results: Most of the consortia focused on treatment (31%), followed by secondary prevention/monitoring (23%) and diagnosis (23%). Almost all consortia (n = 31) aim to reduce morbidity and two-thirds (n = 21) aim to reduce mortality. The four consortia evaluated were Check@Home, LoDoCo2, CONTRAST 2.0 and IMPRESS, with pathways in screening, treatment, treatment and diagnosis, respectively. The total estimated cumulative QALYs gained (from 2023 to 2030) were 1,694, 362, 2,783, and 3,655 respectively.
Discussion: Although it is impossible to estimate the full impact of the DCVA itself, the presented checklist and analyses may increase awareness of the different DCVA activities, roles, and consortia. Existing HTA methods can support the exploration of the potential impact generated by each consortium within the DCVA. The current portfolio of DCVA consortia contributes extensively to the DCVA goal of reducing the CVD burden, provided there is effective support for the adoption and implementation of innovations.
{"title":"Making a difference: describing and evaluating the impact of the Dutch CardioVascular Alliance.","authors":"Sopany Saing, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Astrid Schut, Thea van Asselt, Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Margien G S Boels, Naomi Tramper, Clara van Ofwegen-Hanekamp, Robert Willemsen, Michelle M A Kip, Hendrik Koffijberg","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01975-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01975-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2018, the Dutch CardioVascular Alliance (DCVA), a collaboration between 24 partners in the cardiovascular field, expressed the ambition to reduce the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden in the Netherlands by 25% in 2030. This project aimed to evaluate the extent to which the activities within the DCVA contribute to a reduction in the burden defined as morbidity and mortality combined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The role and potential impact of the DCVA was assessed. Three assessments were conducted: 1) to determine the potential impact of consortia (n = 32) using a checklist; 2) to estimate the potential health benefit (quality-adjusted life years, (QALYs)) and cost savings from a snapshot of consortia (n = 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the consortia focused on treatment (31%), followed by secondary prevention/monitoring (23%) and diagnosis (23%). Almost all consortia (n = 31) aim to reduce morbidity and two-thirds (n = 21) aim to reduce mortality. The four consortia evaluated were Check@Home, LoDoCo2, CONTRAST 2.0 and IMPRESS, with pathways in screening, treatment, treatment and diagnosis, respectively. The total estimated cumulative QALYs gained (from 2023 to 2030) were 1,694, 362, 2,783, and 3,655 respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although it is impossible to estimate the full impact of the DCVA itself, the presented checklist and analyses may increase awareness of the different DCVA activities, roles, and consortia. Existing HTA methods can support the exploration of the potential impact generated by each consortium within the DCVA. The current portfolio of DCVA consortia contributes extensively to the DCVA goal of reducing the CVD burden, provided there is effective support for the adoption and implementation of innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144855850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01973-0
Victor Umans
{"title":"Transforming cardiology with AI: the eko CORE 500 digital stethoscope.","authors":"Victor Umans","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01973-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01973-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144760538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01984-x
Pim van der Harst
{"title":"Timelines, targets, and transitions in cardiovascular care.","authors":"Pim van der Harst","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01984-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01984-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144784794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01964-1
Tinka van Trier, Aaram Omar Khader, Sander van der Brug, Anho Liem, Astrid Schut, Jan Tijssen, Fabrice Martens, Marco Alings
{"title":"PENELOPE-CTRL: protocolised LDL-C lowering compared to real-world care in patients after myocardial infarction.","authors":"Tinka van Trier, Aaram Omar Khader, Sander van der Brug, Anho Liem, Astrid Schut, Jan Tijssen, Fabrice Martens, Marco Alings","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01964-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01964-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"261-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364764/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144540876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01968-x
Melissa E Middeldorp, Colinda van Deutekom, Liann I Weil, Ursula W De Ruijter, Patrick T Jeurissen, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Barbara C van Munster, Michiel Rienstra
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often present with multimorbidity and may require a higher healthcare utilisation. We aimed to compare hospital healthcare utilisation among AF patients to non-cardiovascular disease (non-CVD) patients and explore the role of multimorbidity and age.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records data from three hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 inpatient or outpatient presentation were included. Diagnoses were determined using the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 codes and linked with the Dutch Hospital Data Clinical Classification Software to determine comorbidities.
Results: A total of 226,991 patients, 5,127 (2%) had AF. AF patients had significantly more outpatient visits (6.6 vs 3.6), emergency department visits (0.9 vs 0.2), and in-hospital days (4.0 vs 1.5) compared to non-CVD patients/year (all p < 0.001). AF patients saw more frequently multiple specialists, (13% vs 2% consulting ≥ 5 specialists, p < 0.001). Number of outpatient visits for AF patients increased with number of comorbidities: from a median of 1 (0-1 comorbidities) to 11 (≥ 4 comorbidities) (p < 0.001). Similarly, in-hospital days increased from 0.6 days (0-1 comorbidities) to 8.2 days (≥ 4 comorbidities) (p < 0.001). Regardless of age, AF patients had more outpatient and emergency department visits and more days in hospital days compared to non-CVD patients (all p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with AF had significantly greater hospital healthcare utilisation use compared to non-CVD patients, independent of age. Therefore, there is a need for more cohesive care pathways in AF patients to reduce healthcare utilisation.
背景:心房颤动(AF)患者通常存在多种疾病,可能需要更高的医疗保健利用率。我们的目的是比较房颤患者与非心血管疾病(non-CVD)患者的医院医疗保健利用情况,并探讨多病和年龄的作用。方法:我们使用荷兰三家医院的电子健康记录数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者年龄≥ 18岁,住院或门诊就诊≥ 1例。使用国际疾病和相关健康问题分类10代码确定诊断,并与荷兰医院数据临床分类软件连接以确定合并症。结果:共有226,991例患者,5127例(2%)患有房颤。与非心血管疾病患者相比,房颤患者的门诊就诊次数(6.6 vs 3.6),急诊科就诊次数(0.9 vs 0.2)和住院天数(4.0 vs 1.5) /年显著增加(均p 结论:与非心血管疾病患者相比,房颤患者的医院医疗保健使用率显著增加,与年龄无关。因此,房颤患者需要更有凝聚力的护理途径,以减少医疗保健的利用。
{"title":"Hospital healthcare utilisation in patients with atrial fibrillation: the role of multimorbidity and age.","authors":"Melissa E Middeldorp, Colinda van Deutekom, Liann I Weil, Ursula W De Ruijter, Patrick T Jeurissen, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Barbara C van Munster, Michiel Rienstra","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01968-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01968-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often present with multimorbidity and may require a higher healthcare utilisation. We aimed to compare hospital healthcare utilisation among AF patients to non-cardiovascular disease (non-CVD) patients and explore the role of multimorbidity and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records data from three hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 inpatient or outpatient presentation were included. Diagnoses were determined using the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 codes and linked with the Dutch Hospital Data Clinical Classification Software to determine comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 226,991 patients, 5,127 (2%) had AF. AF patients had significantly more outpatient visits (6.6 vs 3.6), emergency department visits (0.9 vs 0.2), and in-hospital days (4.0 vs 1.5) compared to non-CVD patients/year (all p < 0.001). AF patients saw more frequently multiple specialists, (13% vs 2% consulting ≥ 5 specialists, p < 0.001). Number of outpatient visits for AF patients increased with number of comorbidities: from a median of 1 (0-1 comorbidities) to 11 (≥ 4 comorbidities) (p < 0.001). Similarly, in-hospital days increased from 0.6 days (0-1 comorbidities) to 8.2 days (≥ 4 comorbidities) (p < 0.001). Regardless of age, AF patients had more outpatient and emergency department visits and more days in hospital days compared to non-CVD patients (all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with AF had significantly greater hospital healthcare utilisation use compared to non-CVD patients, independent of age. Therefore, there is a need for more cohesive care pathways in AF patients to reduce healthcare utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"270-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364794/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144659657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01974-z
H Nathoe, Pim van der Harst
{"title":"Reply to: 'Transforming cardiology with AI: the eko CORE 500 digital stethoscope'.","authors":"H Nathoe, Pim van der Harst","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01974-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01974-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144760537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01969-w
Ryan E Accord, Frans J C Cuperus, Elke Hoendermis, Massimo Mariani, Gianclaudio Mecozzi, Maarten W Nijkamp, Vincent E de Meijer, Joost M Klaase, Hans Blokzijl, Meine H Fernhout, Koen M E M Reyntjens, Joost M A A van der Maaten, Marije Smit, J Droogh, Michiel E Erasmus, Kevin Damman, Joost P van Melle
Heart transplantation is considered as the ultimate treatment for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Chronic HF is associated with hepatic congestion and reduced cardiac output, which can lead to progressive liver disease. This issue is particularly relevant in patients with congenital heart disease, especially those with a single functional ventricle managed through Fontan-type surgery. The presence of advanced liver disease may contraindicate isolated heart transplantation and thus require consideration of combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT). However, consensus criteria for CHLT have not yet been established. To illustrate the clinical and scientific discussions on this topic, we present the clinical course of two patients with a Fontan circulation who were evaluated for CHLT and discuss decision-making factors based on a review of current literature. We conclude that establishing a CHLT program represents a promising therapeutic pathway for patients in the Netherlands with advanced HF and concomitant liver disease. Both isolated heart transplantation and CHLT are viable treatment approaches for carefully selected patients with HF and liver disease. However, early identification of potential candidates and timely referral for a comprehensive evaluation are essential for the effective management of this high-risk patient group.
{"title":"Initial experience with combined heart-liver transplantation in the Netherlands: Exploring the boundaries of isolated and combined transplantation.","authors":"Ryan E Accord, Frans J C Cuperus, Elke Hoendermis, Massimo Mariani, Gianclaudio Mecozzi, Maarten W Nijkamp, Vincent E de Meijer, Joost M Klaase, Hans Blokzijl, Meine H Fernhout, Koen M E M Reyntjens, Joost M A A van der Maaten, Marije Smit, J Droogh, Michiel E Erasmus, Kevin Damman, Joost P van Melle","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01969-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01969-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart transplantation is considered as the ultimate treatment for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Chronic HF is associated with hepatic congestion and reduced cardiac output, which can lead to progressive liver disease. This issue is particularly relevant in patients with congenital heart disease, especially those with a single functional ventricle managed through Fontan-type surgery. The presence of advanced liver disease may contraindicate isolated heart transplantation and thus require consideration of combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT). However, consensus criteria for CHLT have not yet been established. To illustrate the clinical and scientific discussions on this topic, we present the clinical course of two patients with a Fontan circulation who were evaluated for CHLT and discuss decision-making factors based on a review of current literature. We conclude that establishing a CHLT program represents a promising therapeutic pathway for patients in the Netherlands with advanced HF and concomitant liver disease. Both isolated heart transplantation and CHLT are viable treatment approaches for carefully selected patients with HF and liver disease. However, early identification of potential candidates and timely referral for a comprehensive evaluation are essential for the effective management of this high-risk patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144691031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01970-3
Cyril Camaro, Marijke J C Timmermans, Judith A van Erkelens, Chantal van Tilburg, Jan Reitsma, Dennis van Veghel, Karin E Arkenbout, Peter Danse
Background: The Dutch ACS working group endorses a delayed invasive approach for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients as safe and acceptable. We analysed the timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all patients admitted with NSTEMI.
Methods: For this retrospective observational cohort study initiated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we extracted Dutch medical claims and diagnosis codes for all NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI. Primary outcome was the time from hospital admission to ICA and PCI in patients admitted to PCI and non-PCI centres. Secondary analyses included the time from ICA to PCI and variation among individual PCI centres.
Results: A total of 36,573 NSTEMI patients (median age 68 years, 30% female) were included in the analysis. 24,857 patients (68%) were admitted to a hospital with PCI facilities (n = 30) and 11,716 patients (32%) to a hospital without PCI on site (n = 42). ICA was performed < 3 days (72 h) in 33,476 patients (92%). For patients admitted in PCI centres ICA was performed < 3 days in 94% (n = 23,328), median 0 days (IQR 0-1) vs 87% (n = 10,148), median 1 day (IQR 1-2) in non-PCI centres. The longest delay (median 3 days; IQR 2-5) between ICA and PCI occurred in patients first admitted to non-PCI centres and transferred after local ICA.
Conclusions: ICA within three days is achieved in a very high percentage of patients in both PCI and non-PCI centres. A clearly larger percentage receives PCI within three days when directly admitted to a PCI centre.
{"title":"Timing of invasive strategy in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Cyril Camaro, Marijke J C Timmermans, Judith A van Erkelens, Chantal van Tilburg, Jan Reitsma, Dennis van Veghel, Karin E Arkenbout, Peter Danse","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01970-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01970-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dutch ACS working group endorses a delayed invasive approach for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients as safe and acceptable. We analysed the timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all patients admitted with NSTEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this retrospective observational cohort study initiated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we extracted Dutch medical claims and diagnosis codes for all NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI. Primary outcome was the time from hospital admission to ICA and PCI in patients admitted to PCI and non-PCI centres. Secondary analyses included the time from ICA to PCI and variation among individual PCI centres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36,573 NSTEMI patients (median age 68 years, 30% female) were included in the analysis. 24,857 patients (68%) were admitted to a hospital with PCI facilities (n = 30) and 11,716 patients (32%) to a hospital without PCI on site (n = 42). ICA was performed < 3 days (72 h) in 33,476 patients (92%). For patients admitted in PCI centres ICA was performed < 3 days in 94% (n = 23,328), median 0 days (IQR 0-1) vs 87% (n = 10,148), median 1 day (IQR 1-2) in non-PCI centres. The longest delay (median 3 days; IQR 2-5) between ICA and PCI occurred in patients first admitted to non-PCI centres and transferred after local ICA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICA within three days is achieved in a very high percentage of patients in both PCI and non-PCI centres. A clearly larger percentage receives PCI within three days when directly admitted to a PCI centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"264-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144784795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01972-1
Geert Hengstman, Salah A M Saïd, Ramon de Nooijer, Paul J M Voorhorst, Frank H J van der Holst, Francisca F Kamphuis-Wolters, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Harry J G M Crijns
Background: Hospital care shifted to home may contribute to sustainability of health care. It is uncertain if home-based electrical cardioversion (ECV) is feasible.
Methods: RACE‑6 is a prospective proof-of-concept pilot study on feasibility of ECV of persistent symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) at patient's homes. It is performed by a mobile nurse-led team, including an emergency care practitioner (ECP) and a sedation nurse, and is remotely supervised by a cardiologist with an ambulance (driver) standby. To ensure safe ECV, the ECP assessed the patients' homes beforehand for accessibility, hygiene, adequate space and light, electrical interference and explosive sources, electricity network stability, and the presence of an adequate informal caregiver overnight.
Results: Six consenting patients with an uneventful previous in-hospital ECV for persistent AF developed one or two symptomatic recurrences and underwent in total 8 separate ECV attempts under conscious sedation at their homes. In all patients sinus rhythm returned and there were no early or late complications. Patients invariably preferred home cardioversion over cardioversion in-hospital.
Discussion: Although applied in highly selected patients, home cardioversion may be extended to a wider selection of patients with persistent AF or even to patients with paroxysmal AF in need of acute restoration of sinus rhythm. Shortening time to cardioversion and early restoration of sinus rhythm may enhance patients' quality of life and postpone AF progression. Home cardioversion may appear safe and improve cost-effectiveness of care but randomized controlled trials are needed to show that home cardioversion may keep AF patients out of the hospital and contribute to the sustainability of health care.
Conclusion: Cardioversion at home is feasible and is generally well received by patients.
{"title":"NuRse-led home CardiovErsion for control of atrial fibrillation-RACE 6.","authors":"Geert Hengstman, Salah A M Saïd, Ramon de Nooijer, Paul J M Voorhorst, Frank H J van der Holst, Francisca F Kamphuis-Wolters, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Harry J G M Crijns","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01972-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01972-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital care shifted to home may contribute to sustainability of health care. It is uncertain if home-based electrical cardioversion (ECV) is feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RACE‑6 is a prospective proof-of-concept pilot study on feasibility of ECV of persistent symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) at patient's homes. It is performed by a mobile nurse-led team, including an emergency care practitioner (ECP) and a sedation nurse, and is remotely supervised by a cardiologist with an ambulance (driver) standby. To ensure safe ECV, the ECP assessed the patients' homes beforehand for accessibility, hygiene, adequate space and light, electrical interference and explosive sources, electricity network stability, and the presence of an adequate informal caregiver overnight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six consenting patients with an uneventful previous in-hospital ECV for persistent AF developed one or two symptomatic recurrences and underwent in total 8 separate ECV attempts under conscious sedation at their homes. In all patients sinus rhythm returned and there were no early or late complications. Patients invariably preferred home cardioversion over cardioversion in-hospital.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although applied in highly selected patients, home cardioversion may be extended to a wider selection of patients with persistent AF or even to patients with paroxysmal AF in need of acute restoration of sinus rhythm. Shortening time to cardioversion and early restoration of sinus rhythm may enhance patients' quality of life and postpone AF progression. Home cardioversion may appear safe and improve cost-effectiveness of care but randomized controlled trials are needed to show that home cardioversion may keep AF patients out of the hospital and contribute to the sustainability of health care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardioversion at home is feasible and is generally well received by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364774/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144760536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1007/s12471-025-01966-z
Janneke I A Vloet, Esmée A Bakker, Bram M A van Bakel, Sophie H Kroesen, Dick H J Thijssen, Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Background: The COVID-19 lockdown negatively impacted physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) levels of the Dutch patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), but little is known whether these levels returned to pre-pandemic levels. In this study, we evaluated changes in SB and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in CVD patients before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic and investigated which factors contributed to not returning to pre-pandemic sedentary levels.
Methods: 1,028 Dutch CVD patients participated in this prospective cohort study, where we assessed SB and MVPA before (2018), during (2020), and after (2023) the COVID-19 pandemic using validated questionnaires. Linear mixed model analyses were used to investigate changes over time. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with not returning to pre-pandemic SB levels.
Results: SB levels significantly increased from 7.8 h/day at pre-pandemic assessment to 8.7 h/day during lockdown and then significantly decreased to 8.5 h/day at the post-pandemic assessment, but did not return to pre-pandemic levels (p = 0.006). MVPA did not significantly change over time. Lower pre-pandemic SB levels, a larger increase in SB during lockdown, self-reported residual complaints after COVID-19, and diagnosis of arrhythmias at baseline were associated with not returning to pre-pandemic SB levels.
Conclusion: Sedentary time in CVD patients did not return to pre-pandemic levels, 3 years following initial COVID-19 lockdown, while levels of MVPA did not change over time. These findings suggest that lifestyle interventions could be considered to reactivate CVD patients and lower their risk of disease progression and adverse health outcomes. SB bij CVD-patiënten keerde niet terug naar het niveau van voor de pandemie, drie jaar na de eerste COVID-19 lockdown, terwijl MVPA onveranderd bleef. Deze bevindingen suggereren dat leefstijlinterventies overwogen kunnen worden om CVD-patiënten opnieuw te activeren en hun risico op ziekteprogressie en nadelige gezondheidseffecten te verlagen.
背景:COVID-19封锁对荷兰心血管疾病(CVD)患者的身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)水平产生了负面影响,但这些水平是否恢复到大流行前的水平尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们评估了在COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后CVD患者的SB和中高强度PA (MVPA)的变化,并调查了哪些因素导致未恢复到大流行前的久坐水平。方法:1028名荷兰心血管疾病患者参与了这项前瞻性队列研究,我们在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前(2018年)、期间(2020年)和之后(2023年)使用有效问卷评估了SB和MVPA。线性混合模型分析用于调查随时间的变化。进行了二元logistic回归分析,以检查与未恢复到大流行前SB水平相关的因素。结果:SB水平从大流行前评估时的7.8 h/天显著上升到封锁期间的8.7 h/天,然后在大流行后评估时显著下降到8.5 h/天,但没有恢复到大流行前的水平(p = 0.006)。MVPA随时间变化不显著。大流行前较低的SB水平、封锁期间SB的较大增加、COVID-19后自我报告的残留症状以及基线时心律失常的诊断与未恢复到大流行前SB水平有关。结论:CVD患者的久坐时间在COVID-19初始封锁后3年没有恢复到大流行前的水平,而MVPA水平没有随时间变化。这些发现表明,生活方式干预可以使心血管疾病患者恢复活力,降低疾病进展和不良健康结果的风险。SB bij CVD-patiënten keerde neet - terug - niveau - van - voor - de - pandemic, drive - jaar - de - evst -封城,将MVPA - ververder - blee。研究结果表明,干预措施与干预措施之间存在着明显的差异,即过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预、过度干预等。
{"title":"Do cardiovascular disease patients return to pre-lockdown sedentary levels? A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Janneke I A Vloet, Esmée A Bakker, Bram M A van Bakel, Sophie H Kroesen, Dick H J Thijssen, Thijs M H Eijsvogels","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01966-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-025-01966-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdown negatively impacted physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) levels of the Dutch patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), but little is known whether these levels returned to pre-pandemic levels. In this study, we evaluated changes in SB and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in CVD patients before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic and investigated which factors contributed to not returning to pre-pandemic sedentary levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1,028 Dutch CVD patients participated in this prospective cohort study, where we assessed SB and MVPA before (2018), during (2020), and after (2023) the COVID-19 pandemic using validated questionnaires. Linear mixed model analyses were used to investigate changes over time. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with not returning to pre-pandemic SB levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SB levels significantly increased from 7.8 h/day at pre-pandemic assessment to 8.7 h/day during lockdown and then significantly decreased to 8.5 h/day at the post-pandemic assessment, but did not return to pre-pandemic levels (p = 0.006). MVPA did not significantly change over time. Lower pre-pandemic SB levels, a larger increase in SB during lockdown, self-reported residual complaints after COVID-19, and diagnosis of arrhythmias at baseline were associated with not returning to pre-pandemic SB levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary time in CVD patients did not return to pre-pandemic levels, 3 years following initial COVID-19 lockdown, while levels of MVPA did not change over time. These findings suggest that lifestyle interventions could be considered to reactivate CVD patients and lower their risk of disease progression and adverse health outcomes. SB bij CVD-patiënten keerde niet terug naar het niveau van voor de pandemie, drie jaar na de eerste COVID-19 lockdown, terwijl MVPA onveranderd bleef. Deze bevindingen suggereren dat leefstijlinterventies overwogen kunnen worden om CVD-patiënten opnieuw te activeren en hun risico op ziekteprogressie en nadelige gezondheidseffecten te verlagen.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"232-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144528999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}