Pub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1007/s12471-024-01862-y
Shirin Ibrahim, Jim N. de Goeij, Nick S. Nurmohamed, Jing Pang, Sibbeliene E. van den Bosch, Fabrice M. A. C. Martens, Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep, Willemijn Corpeleijn, Talip Tumkaya, G. Kees Hovingh, Gerald F. Watts, Erik S. G. Stroes, Laurens F. Reeskamp
Background
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) warrants early diagnosis to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment of FH persist. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of FH care among general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands.
Methods
An internationally standardised, online questionnaire was sent to Dutch GPs between February 2021 and July 2022. The survey assessed knowledge and awareness of FH, encompassing general familiarity, awareness of management guidelines, inheritance, prevalence, CVD risk, and clinical practice related to FH. Comparative analysis was performed using data on primary care physicians from Western Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and the United Kingdom.
Results
Of the 221 participating GPs, 62.4% rated their familiarity with FH as above average (score > 4 on a 1–7 scale), with 91.4% considering themselves familiar with FH treatment and referral guidelines. Correct identification of the FH definition, typical lipid profile, inheritance pattern, prevalence and CVD risk was reported by 83.7%, 87.8%, 55.7%, 19.5%, and 13.6% of the respondents, respectively. Of the participants, 58.4% answered fewer than half of the 8 knowledge questions correctly. Dutch GPs reported greater FH familiarity and guideline awareness compared with their international counterparts but exhibited similar low performance on FH knowledge questions.
Conclusion
Despite the Netherlands’ relatively high FH detection rate, substantial knowledge gaps regarding FH persist among Dutch GPs, mirroring global trends. Enhanced FH education and awareness in primary care are imperative to improve FH detection and ensure adequate treatment. Targeting the global suboptimal understanding of FH might require international efforts.
{"title":"Unexpected gaps in knowledge of familial hypercholesterolaemia among Dutch general practitioners","authors":"Shirin Ibrahim, Jim N. de Goeij, Nick S. Nurmohamed, Jing Pang, Sibbeliene E. van den Bosch, Fabrice M. A. C. Martens, Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep, Willemijn Corpeleijn, Talip Tumkaya, G. Kees Hovingh, Gerald F. Watts, Erik S. G. Stroes, Laurens F. Reeskamp","doi":"10.1007/s12471-024-01862-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-024-01862-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) warrants early diagnosis to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment of FH persist. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of FH care among general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>An internationally standardised, online questionnaire was sent to Dutch GPs between February 2021 and July 2022. The survey assessed knowledge and awareness of FH, encompassing general familiarity, awareness of management guidelines, inheritance, prevalence, CVD risk, and clinical practice related to FH. Comparative analysis was performed using data on primary care physicians from Western Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and the United Kingdom.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 221 participating GPs, 62.4% rated their familiarity with FH as above average (score > 4 on a 1–7 scale), with 91.4% considering themselves familiar with FH treatment and referral guidelines. Correct identification of the FH definition, typical lipid profile, inheritance pattern, prevalence and CVD risk was reported by 83.7%, 87.8%, 55.7%, 19.5%, and 13.6% of the respondents, respectively. Of the participants, 58.4% answered fewer than half of the 8 knowledge questions correctly. Dutch GPs reported greater FH familiarity and guideline awareness compared with their international counterparts but exhibited similar low performance on FH knowledge questions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the Netherlands’ relatively high FH detection rate, substantial knowledge gaps regarding FH persist among Dutch GPs, mirroring global trends. Enhanced FH education and awareness in primary care are imperative to improve FH detection and ensure adequate treatment. Targeting the global suboptimal understanding of FH might require international efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140573213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5
Samir Ali, Christiaan L Meuwese, Xavier J R Moors, Dirk W Donker, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Marcel C G van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda
Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.
{"title":"Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.","authors":"Samir Ali, Christiaan L Meuwese, Xavier J R Moors, Dirk W Donker, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Marcel C G van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139906125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-03-19DOI: 10.1007/s12471-024-01864-w
Pim van der Harst
{"title":"Enhancing dialogue: Introducing 'Letters to the Editor'.","authors":"Pim van der Harst","doi":"10.1007/s12471-024-01864-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-024-01864-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":"32 4","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140175660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-11-28DOI: 10.1007/s12471-023-01828-6
Fenna Daniëls, Tanwier T T K Ramdjan, Balázs Mánfai, Ahmet Adiyaman, Jaap Jan J Smit, Peter Paul H M Delnoy, Arif Elvan
Background: Untreated atrial fibrillation (AF) often results in increased morbidity and mortality. Opportunistic AF screening in persons aged ≥ 65 years is recommended to identify patients with AF in order to prevent AF-related complications.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of screening persons for AF with the Kardia mobile electrocardiogram device (MED) and to determine the percentage of newly detected AF cases by selective population screening in the Netherlands.
Methods: Persons aged ≥ 65 years, without a medical history of AF, in nursing homes, at public events or visiting the general practitioner (GP) were approached to participate. A Kardia MED smartphone ECG (sECG) was recorded and the CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated. An automated AF algorithm classified the sECGs as 'sinus rhythm', 'AF' or 'unclassified'. In the case of AF, participants were referred to their GP. All sECGs were assessed by blinded experts.
Results: A total of 2168 participants were screened for AF. According to the expert's interpretation, 2.5% had newly detected AF, of whom 76.4% never experienced palpitations and 89.1% had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. The algorithm result was unclassified in 12.2% of cases, of which 95.5% were interpretable by experts. With expert opinion as the gold standard and excluding unclassified sECGs, the Kardia MED's negative and positive predictive value for detecting AF was 99.8% and 60.0%, respectively.
Conclusion: Screening for AF using the Kardia MED is feasible and results in 2.5% newly detected AF cases. Expert interpretation of algorithm outcomes AF and unclassified is recommended.
{"title":"Detection of atrial fibrillation in persons aged 65 years and above using a mobile electrocardiogram device.","authors":"Fenna Daniëls, Tanwier T T K Ramdjan, Balázs Mánfai, Ahmet Adiyaman, Jaap Jan J Smit, Peter Paul H M Delnoy, Arif Elvan","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01828-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-023-01828-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Untreated atrial fibrillation (AF) often results in increased morbidity and mortality. Opportunistic AF screening in persons aged ≥ 65 years is recommended to identify patients with AF in order to prevent AF-related complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of screening persons for AF with the Kardia mobile electrocardiogram device (MED) and to determine the percentage of newly detected AF cases by selective population screening in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Persons aged ≥ 65 years, without a medical history of AF, in nursing homes, at public events or visiting the general practitioner (GP) were approached to participate. A Kardia MED smartphone ECG (sECG) was recorded and the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was calculated. An automated AF algorithm classified the sECGs as 'sinus rhythm', 'AF' or 'unclassified'. In the case of AF, participants were referred to their GP. All sECGs were assessed by blinded experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2168 participants were screened for AF. According to the expert's interpretation, 2.5% had newly detected AF, of whom 76.4% never experienced palpitations and 89.1% had a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score ≥ 2. The algorithm result was unclassified in 12.2% of cases, of which 95.5% were interpretable by experts. With expert opinion as the gold standard and excluding unclassified sECGs, the Kardia MED's negative and positive predictive value for detecting AF was 99.8% and 60.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening for AF using the Kardia MED is feasible and results in 2.5% newly detected AF cases. Expert interpretation of algorithm outcomes AF and unclassified is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"160-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138445498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-02-15DOI: 10.1007/s12471-023-01849-1
Angelique Emiola, Jolanda Kluin, Sulayman El Mathari, Joris R de Groot, Wim-Jan van Boven
Introduction: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common phenomenon following cardiac surgery. In this study, we assessed current preventive strategies used by Dutch cardiothoracic centres, identified common views on this matter and related these to international guidelines.
Methods: We developed an online questionnaire and sent it to all cardiothoracic surgery centres in the Netherlands. The questionnaire concerned the management of POAF and the use of pharmaceutical therapies (beta-blockers and calcium antagonists) and non-pharmaceutical methods (posterior left pericardiotomy, pericardial flushing and epicardial botulinum toxin type A injections). Usage of electrical cardioversions, anticoagulants and left atrial appendage closure were also enquired.
Results: Of the 15 centres, 14 (93%) responded to the survey and 13 reported a POAF incidence, ranging from 20 to 30%. Of these 14 centres, 6 prescribed preoperative AF prophylaxis to their patients, of which non-sotalol beta-blockers were prescribed most commonly (57%). Postoperative medication was administered by all centres and included non-sotalol beta-blockers (38%), sotalol (24%), digoxin (14%), calcium antagonists (13%) and amiodarone (10%). Only 2 centres used posterior left pericardiotomy or pericardial flushing as surgical manoeuvres to prevent POAF. Moreover, respondents expressed the need for guidance on anticoagulant use.
Conclusion: Despite the use of various preventive strategies, the reported incidence of POAF was similar in Dutch cardiothoracic centres. This study highlights limited use of prophylactic amiodarone and colchicine, despite recommendations by numerous guidelines, and restricted implementation of surgical strategies to prevent POAF.
{"title":"Interventions to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in Dutch cardiothoracic centres: a survey study.","authors":"Angelique Emiola, Jolanda Kluin, Sulayman El Mathari, Joris R de Groot, Wim-Jan van Boven","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01849-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-023-01849-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common phenomenon following cardiac surgery. In this study, we assessed current preventive strategies used by Dutch cardiothoracic centres, identified common views on this matter and related these to international guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an online questionnaire and sent it to all cardiothoracic surgery centres in the Netherlands. The questionnaire concerned the management of POAF and the use of pharmaceutical therapies (beta-blockers and calcium antagonists) and non-pharmaceutical methods (posterior left pericardiotomy, pericardial flushing and epicardial botulinum toxin type A injections). Usage of electrical cardioversions, anticoagulants and left atrial appendage closure were also enquired.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15 centres, 14 (93%) responded to the survey and 13 reported a POAF incidence, ranging from 20 to 30%. Of these 14 centres, 6 prescribed preoperative AF prophylaxis to their patients, of which non-sotalol beta-blockers were prescribed most commonly (57%). Postoperative medication was administered by all centres and included non-sotalol beta-blockers (38%), sotalol (24%), digoxin (14%), calcium antagonists (13%) and amiodarone (10%). Only 2 centres used posterior left pericardiotomy or pericardial flushing as surgical manoeuvres to prevent POAF. Moreover, respondents expressed the need for guidance on anticoagulant use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the use of various preventive strategies, the reported incidence of POAF was similar in Dutch cardiothoracic centres. This study highlights limited use of prophylactic amiodarone and colchicine, despite recommendations by numerous guidelines, and restricted implementation of surgical strategies to prevent POAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"173-181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139735672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1007/s12471-024-01865-9
Martin E W Hemels, Robert G Tieleman
{"title":"How to tackle the unknowns in atrial fibrillation?","authors":"Martin E W Hemels, Robert G Tieleman","doi":"10.1007/s12471-024-01865-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-024-01865-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"156-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139996887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-30DOI: 10.1007/s12471-023-01850-8
Mileen R D van de Kar, Stacey R Slingerland, Gijs J van Steenbergen, Tim Brouwer, Daniela N Schulz, Dennis van Veghel, Lukas Dekker
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation often necessitates catheter ablation when antiarrhythmic drug therapy fails. Single-shot technologies using thermal energy, such as cryoballoon ablation, are commonly used, but pulsed field ablation (PFA), an innovative non-thermal ablation technique, is a potential alternative. This retrospective observational study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation and PFA in patients undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure for atrial fibrillation treatment.
Methods: We utilised real-world data from patients who underwent PVI using cryoballoon ablation or PFA. The primary outcome encompassed procedural complications, including phrenic nerve palsy, cardiac tamponade, thromboembolic complications, bleeding complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were procedural characteristics including procedure duration, length of hospital admission, and re-do ablation rates within 6 months.
Results: A total of 1714 procedures were analysed: 1241 in the cryoballoon group and 473 in the PFA group. Gender distribution (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.01) differed significantly. With regard to the primary outcome, the cryoballoon group demonstrated a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy compared with the PFA group (15 vs 0; p = 0.02). The procedure duration was shorter in the PFA group, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics (95.0 vs 74.0 min; p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, admission duration differed between the groups as well (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: The study results supported the safety and efficacy of PFA over cryoballoon ablation for PVI, highlighting advantages such as shorter procedure duration and absence of phrenic nerve palsy.
导言:当抗心律失常药物治疗无效时,心房颤动往往需要进行导管消融。冷冻气球消融术等使用热能的单次消融技术是常用的方法,但脉冲场消融术(PFA)是一种创新的非热能消融技术,也是一种潜在的替代方法。这项回顾性观察研究旨在比较冷冻气球消融术和脉冲场消融术对首次接受肺静脉隔离术(PVI)治疗心房颤动患者的安全性和有效性:我们利用了使用冷冻球囊消融术或 PFA 进行 PVI 患者的真实数据。主要结果包括手术并发症,包括膈神经麻痹、心脏填塞、血栓栓塞并发症、出血并发症和死亡率。次要结果是手术特征,包括手术时间、住院时间和6个月内再次消融率:共分析了1714例手术:冷冻球囊组1241例,PFA组473例。性别分布(p = 0.03)和估计肾小球滤过率(p = 0.01)差异显著。在主要结果方面,冷冻气球组的膈神经麻痹发生率高于 PFA 组(15 vs 0; p = 0.02)。即使在调整了基线特征后,PFA 组的手术时间也更短(95.0 分钟 vs 74.0 分钟;p 结论:冷冻气球组的膈神经麻痹发生率高于 PFA 组(15 vs 0;p = 0.02):研究结果表明,与冷冻球囊消融术相比,PFA 对 PVI 的安全性和有效性更胜一筹,并突出了手术时间更短和无膈神经麻痹等优势。
{"title":"Pulsed field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a real-world observational study on procedural outcomes and efficacy.","authors":"Mileen R D van de Kar, Stacey R Slingerland, Gijs J van Steenbergen, Tim Brouwer, Daniela N Schulz, Dennis van Veghel, Lukas Dekker","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01850-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12471-023-01850-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation often necessitates catheter ablation when antiarrhythmic drug therapy fails. Single-shot technologies using thermal energy, such as cryoballoon ablation, are commonly used, but pulsed field ablation (PFA), an innovative non-thermal ablation technique, is a potential alternative. This retrospective observational study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation and PFA in patients undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure for atrial fibrillation treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilised real-world data from patients who underwent PVI using cryoballoon ablation or PFA. The primary outcome encompassed procedural complications, including phrenic nerve palsy, cardiac tamponade, thromboembolic complications, bleeding complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were procedural characteristics including procedure duration, length of hospital admission, and re-do ablation rates within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1714 procedures were analysed: 1241 in the cryoballoon group and 473 in the PFA group. Gender distribution (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.01) differed significantly. With regard to the primary outcome, the cryoballoon group demonstrated a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy compared with the PFA group (15 vs 0; p = 0.02). The procedure duration was shorter in the PFA group, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics (95.0 vs 74.0 min; p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, admission duration differed between the groups as well (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results supported the safety and efficacy of PFA over cryoballoon ablation for PVI, highlighting advantages such as shorter procedure duration and absence of phrenic nerve palsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951164/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139642554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}