Molecular Cytogenetics最新文献

Background: BCR::ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCR::ABL1-like ALL) is characterized by inferior outcomes. Current efforts concentrate on the identification of molecular targets to improve the therapy results. The accessibility to next generation sequencing, a recommended diagnostic method, is limited. We present our experience in the BCR::ABL1-like ALL diagnostics, using a simplified algorithm.

Results: Out of 102 B-ALL adult patients admitted to our Department in the years 2008-2022, 71 patients with available genetic material were included. The diagnostic algorithm comprised flow cytometry, fluorescent in-situ hybridization, karyotype analysis and molecular testing with high resolution melt analysis and Sanger Sequencing. We recognized recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in 32 patients. The remaining 39 patients were screened for BCR::ABL1-like features. Among them, we identified 6 patients with BCR::ABL1-like features (15.4%). Notably, we documented CRLF2-rearranged (CRLF2-r) BCR::ABL1-like ALL occurrence in a patient with long-term remission of previously CRLF2-r negative ALL.

Conclusions: An algorithm implementing widely available techniques enables the identification of BCR::ABL1-like ALL cases in settings with limited resources.

Background: Copy-number variants (CNVs) drive many neurodevelopmental-related disorders. Although many neurodevelopmental-related CNVs can give rise to widespread phenotypes, it is necessary to identify the major genes contributing to phenotypic presentation. Copy-number variations in chromosome 6, such as independent 6p deletion and 6p duplication, have been reported in several live-born infants and present widespread abnormalities such as intellectual disability, growth deficiency, developmental delay, and multiple dysmorphic facial features. However, a contiguous deletion and duplication in chromosome 6p regions have been reported in only a few cases.

Case presentation: In this study, we reported the first duplication of chromosome band 6p25.3-p22.3 with deletion of 6p25.3 in a pedigree. This is the first case reported involving CNVs in these chromosomal regions. In this pedigree, we reported a 1-year-old boy with maternal 6p25-pter duplication characterized by chromosome karyotype. Further analysis using CNV-seq revealed a 20.88-Mb duplication at 6p25.3-p22.3 associated with a contiguous 0.66-Mb 6p25.3 deletion. Whole exome sequencing confirmed the deletion/duplication and identified no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants related with the patient´s phenotype. The proband presented abnormal growth, developmental delay, skeletal dysplasia, hearing loss, and dysmorphic facial features. Additionally, he presented recurrent infection after birth. CNV-seq using the proband´s parental samples showed that the deletion/duplication was inherited from the proband´s mother, who exhibited a similar phenotype to the proband. When compared with other cases, this proband and his mother presented a new clinical finding: forearm bone dysplasia. The major candidate genes contributing to recurrent infection, eye development, hearing loss features, neurodevelopmental development, and congenital bone dysplasia were further discussed.

Conclusions: Our results showed a new clinical finding of a contiguous deletion and duplication in chromosome 6p regions and suggested candidate genes associated with phenotypic features, such as FOXC1, SERPINB6, NRN1, TUBB2A, IRF4, and RIPK1.

Background: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows for screening of fetal aneuploidy and copy number variants (CNVs) from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Professional societies have not yet embraced NIPT for fetal CNVs, citing a need for additional performance data. A clinically available genome-wide cfDNA test screens for fetal aneuploidy and CNVs larger than 7 megabases (Mb).

Results: This study reviews 701 pregnancies with "high risk" indications for fetal aneuploidy which underwent both genome-wide cfDNA and prenatal microarray. For aneuploidies and CNVs considered 'in-scope' for the cfDNA test (CNVs ≥ 7 Mb and select microdeletions), sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 97.3% respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 63.8% and 99.7% as compared to microarray. When including 'out-of-scope' CNVs on array as false negatives, the sensitivity of cfDNA falls to 48.3%. If only pathogenic out-of-scope CNVs are treated as false negatives, the sensitivity is 63.8%. Of the out-of-scope CNVs identified by array smaller than 7 Mb, 50% were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), with an overall VUS rate in the study of 2.29%.

Conclusions: While microarray provides the most robust assessment of fetal CNVs, this study suggests that genome-wide cfDNA can reliably screen for large CNVs in a high-risk cohort. Informed consent and adequate pretest counseling are essential to ensuring patients understand the benefits and limitations of all prenatal testing and screening options.

Background: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare, autosomal recessive, hereditary neurodegenerative disorder. It is characterized mainly by early onset progressive encephalopathy, concomitant with an increase in interferon-α levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a procedure that could be used to choose unaffected embryos for transfer after analysis of biopsied cells, which prevents at-risk couples from facing the risk of pregnancy termination.

Methods: Trio-based whole exome sequencing, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis were used to determine the pathogenic mutations for the family. To block the inheritance of the disease, multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles was used for whole genome amplification of the biopsied trophectoderm cells. Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotyping were used to detect the state of the gene mutations. Copy number variation (CNV) analysis was also carried out to prevent embryonic chromosomal abnormalities. Prenatal diagnosis was preformed to verify the PGT outcomes.

Results: A novel compound heterozygous mutation in TREX1 gene was found in the proband causing AGS. A total of 3 blastocysts formed after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were biopsied. After genetic analyses, an embryo harbored a heterozygous mutation in TREX1 and without CNV was transferred. A healthy baby was born at 38th weeks and prenatal diagnosis results confirmed the accuracy of PGT.

Conclusions: In this study, we identified two novel pathogenic mutations in TREX1, which has not been previously reported. Our study extends the mutation spectrum of TREX1 gene and contributes to the molecular diagnosis as well as genetic counseling for AGS. Our results demonstrated that combining NGS-based SNP haplotyping for PGT-M with invasive prenatal diagnosis is an effective approach to block the transmission of AGS and could be applied to prevent other monogenic diseases.

Background: Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is an autosomal dominant skeletal disorder characterized by the development of multiple, circumscript and usually symmetric bony protuberances called osteochondromas. Most HME are caused by EXT1 and EXT2 loss of function mutations. Most pathogenic mutations are nonsense followed by missense mutations and deletions.

Case presentation: Here we report on a patient with a rare and complex genotype resulting in a typical HME phenotype. Initial point mutation screening in EXT1 and EXT2 genes by Sanger sequencing did not reveal any pathogenic variants. The patient along with the healthy parents was subsequently referred for karyotype and array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) analyses. Chromosomal analysis revealed two independent de novo apparently balanced rearrangements: a balanced translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 2 and 3 at breakpoints 2q22 and 3q13.2 and a pericentric inversion with breakpoints at 8p23.1q24.1. Both breakpoints were confirmed by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Subsequently, array-CGH revealed a novel heterozygous deletion within the EXT1 gene at one of the inversion breakpoints, rendering the inversion unbalanced. The mode of inheritance, as well as the size of the deletion were further investigated by Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR), defining the deletion as de novo and of 3.1 kb in size, removing exon 10 of EXT1. The inversion in combination with the 8p23.1 deletion most likely abolishes the transcription of EXT1 downstream of exon 10 hence resulting in a truncated protein.

Conclusions: The identification of a rare and novel genetic cause of HME, highlights the importance of additional comprehensive investigation of patients with typical clinical manifestations, even when EXT1 and EXT2 mutation analysis is negative.

Background: X/Y translocations are highly heterogeneity in terms of clinical genetic effects, and most patients lack complete pedigree analysis for clinical and genetic characterization.

Results: This study comprehensively analyzed the clinical and genetic characteristics of three new patients with X/Y translocations. Furthermore, cases with X/Y translocations reported in the literature and studies exploring the clinical genetic effects in patients with X/Y translocations were reviewed. All three female patients were carriers of X/Y translocations with different phenotypes. The karyotype for patient 1 was 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(p22.33;q12)mat, patient 2 was 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(q21.2;q11.2)dn, and patient 3 was 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(q28;q11.223)t(Y;Y)(q12;q11.223)mat. C-banding analysis of all three patients revealed a large heterochromatin region in the terminal region of the X chromosome. All patients underwent chromosomal microarray analysis, which revealed the precise copy number loss or gain. Data on 128 patients with X/Y translocations were retrieved from 81 studies; the phenotype of these patients was related to the breakpoint of the chromosome, size of the deleted region, and their sex. We reclassified the X/Y translocations into new types based on the breakpoints of the X and Y chromosomes.

Conclusion: X/Y translocations have substantial phenotypic diversity, and the genetic classification standards are not unified. With the development of molecular cytogenetics, it is necessary to combine multiple genetic methods to obtain an accurate and reasonable classification. Thus, clarifying their genetic causes and effects promptly will help in genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis, preimplantation genetic testing, and improvement in clinical treatment strategies.

Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) is the most common autosomal aneuploidy among newborns. About 90% result from meiotic nondisjunction during oogenesis, which occurs around conception, when also the most profound epigenetic modifications take place. Thus, maternal meiosis is an error prone process with an extreme sensitivity to endogenous factors, as exemplified by maternal age. This contrasts with the missing acceptance of causal exogenous factors. The proof of an environmental agent is a great challenge, both with respect to ascertainment bias, determination of time and dosage of exposure, as well as registration of the relevant individual health data affecting the birth prevalence. Based on a few exemplary epidemiological studies the feasibility of trisomy 21 monitoring is illustrated. In the nearer future the methodical premises will be clearly improved, both due to the establishment of electronic health registers and to the introduction of non-invasive prenatal tests. Down syndrome is a sentinel phenotype, presumably also with regard to other congenital anomalies. Thus, monitoring of trisomy 21 offers new chances for risk avoidance and preventive measures, but also for basic research concerning identification of relevant genomic variants involved in chromosomal nondisjunction.

Background: Optical genome mapping (OGM) has developed into a highly promising method for detecting structural variants (SVs) in human genomes. Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) and cryptic translocations are rare events that are considered difficult to detect by routine cytogenetic methods. In this study, OGM was applied to delineate the precise chromosomal rearrangements in three cases with uncertain or unconfirmed CCRs detected by conventional karyotyping and one case with a cryptic translocation suggested by fetal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).

Results: In the three cases with CCRs, OGM not only confirmed or revised the original karyotyping results but also refined the precise chromosomal structures. In the case with a suspected translocation not detected by karyotyping, OGM efficiently identified the cryptic translocation and defined the genomic breakpoints with relatively high accuracy.

Conclusions: Our study confirmed OGM as a robust alternative approach to karyotyping for the detection of chromosomal structural rearrangements, including CCRs and cryptic translocations.

Background: There are a few studies on the chromosomal aberration of Ultrasound soft markers (USMs). The aim of this study was to determine the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities (CSCA) in fetuses with different USMs.

Methods: This study included fetuses with USMs who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis for karyotype and/or chromosomal microarray (CMA) by categorizing into two groups: a single USM (SUSM) and multiple USMs (MUSMs).

Results: Of the 358 cases with USMs, CSCA occurred in 3.09% (8/259) and 8.08% (8/99) of the SUSM and MUSM groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 16 cases identified with CSCA, theoretically 68.75% (11/16) could be detected by karyotype, while 31.25% (5/16) could be recognized only by CMA. Among CSCA cases, the most frequent USM was an absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (62.5%, 10/16). In cases with negative karyotypes and/or CMA, follow-up results were available in 307 cases, including 292 term deliveries, 6 preterm deliveries, 8 terminations of pregnancy due to USMs, and 1 still birth.

Conclusion: MUSMs increased the risk of chromosomal abnormalities. An absent or hypoplastic nasal bone was the most clinically significant marker either alone or in combination with other USMs. Most of SUSM had a good prognosis.

Objective: To highlight the reasons of culture failure in bone marrow aspirate samples sent for Cytogenetic analysis and to identify the associated parameters causing this impact.

Methodology: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in the Clinical and Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory of NIBD Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. The rates of culture failure are assessed from the year 2017-2020 along with their reasons. Bone Marrow aspirate samples of patients with hematological malignancies were cultured for chromosomal analysis, both at the time of diagnosis or relapse. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.

Results: A total of 1061 bone marrow aspirate samples were assessed for cytogenetic culture failures from the duration of 2017 to 2020. Ratio of males was predominantly higher i.e. 62.7% than female 37.3% with Mean ± SD age was 36.78 ± 18.94. Frequency of culture failure in the year 2020 was relatively high 20% as compared to the preceding years i.e. 8% in 2017, 6% in 2018, 7% in 2019. However, the patients were diagnosed with the following hematological malignancies; ALL 23%, CML 17.1%, AML 16.5% and AA 12.5%. Among the reasons of culture failure, cytogenetic analysis of patients with on-going chemo resulted in significant culture failures with p-value < 0.001 and the hematological malignancy, Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, significantly impacted the growth of bone marrow aspirate cultures, with p-value < 0.001.

Conclusion: Significant findings were associated with causative factors of culture failure including on-going treatment and sample issues of clotted bone marrow as well as with the clinical diagnosis. These evaluations facilitated in overcoming the rise in culture failures. As per our knowledge, no such data, discussing the effects of various parameters such as sample quality, diagnosis, effects of treatment etc., has been documented previously.