Neurology and Therapy最新文献

Cladribine tablets (CladT) has been available for therapeutic use in France since March 2021 for the management of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. In contrast to most high-efficacy DMTs, which act via continuous immunosuppression, two short courses of oral treatment with CladT at the beginning of years 1 and 2 of treatment provide long-term control of MS disease activity in responders to treatment, without the need for any further pharmacological treatment for several years. Although the labelling for CladT does not provide guidance beyond the initial treatment courses, real-world data on the therapeutic use of CladT from registries of previous clinical trial participants and patients treated in routine practice indicate that MS disease activity is controlled for a period of years beyond this time for a substantial proportion of patients. Moreover, this clinical experience has provided useful information on how to initiate and manage treatment with CladT. In this article we, a group of expert neurologists from France, provide recommendations on the initiation of CladT in DMT-naïve patients, how to switch from existing DMTs to CladT for patients with continuing MS disease activity, how to manage patients during the first 2 years of treatment and finally, how to manage patients with or without MS disease activity in years 3, 4 and beyond after initiating treatment with CladT. We believe that optimisation of the use of CladT beyond its initial courses of treatment will maximise the benefits of this treatment, especially early in the course of MS when suppression of focal inflammation in the CNS is a clinical priority to limit MS disease progression.

Introduction: It is important to assess the effectiveness of an antiseizure medication in treating different epilepsy aetiologies to optimise individualised therapeutic approaches. Data from the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) Extension study were used to assess the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat individuals with a range of epilepsy aetiologies in clinical practice.

Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted of PERMIT Extension data from individuals with a known aetiology. Retention was assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included responder rate (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation.

Results: PERMIT Extension included 1945 individuals with structural aetiology, 1012 with genetic aetiology, 93 with an infectious aetiology, and 26 with an immune aetiology. Retention rates at 12 months were 61.1% (structural), 65.9% (genetic), 56.8% (infectious) and 56.5% (immune). At the last visit, responder rates (total seizures) were 43.3% (structural), 68.3% (genetic), 37.0% (infectious) and 20.0% (immune), and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 15.8%, 46.5%, 11.1% and 5.0%, respectively. AE incidence rates were 58.0% (structural), 46.5% (genetic), 51.1% (infectious) and 65.0% (immune), and corresponding rates of discontinuation due to AEs over 12 months were 18.9%, 16.4%, 18.5% and 21.7%, respectively. The types of AEs reported were generally consistent across aetiology subgroups, with no idiosyncratic AEs emerging.

Conclusion: Although PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat individuals with a range of epilepsy aetiologies in clinical practice, variability in its effectiveness and tolerability across the subgroups indicates that PER may be particularly useful for individuals with specific epilepsy aetiologies.

Cognitive symptoms affect disease management and activities of daily living for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS). This summary of research article summarises previously published discussions ('What is the true impact of cognitive impairment for people living with multiple sclerosis? A commentary of symposium discussions at the 2020 European Charcot Foundation') from the 2020 European Charcot Foundation meeting between a patient expert living with MS, a neuropsychologist and a neurologist about the impact of cognitive impairment on people living with MS. These discussions highlighted that cognitive impairment may be under-prioritised in MS care and has a substantial impact on the daily lives of people living with MS. To address this, the panel recommended improved awareness about impaired cognition in MS, improved communication between people living with MS and healthcare professionals, and routine cognition screening. This will help improve management of cognitive symptoms to maximise the quality of life of people living with MS.

Introduction: Repeat transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) demonstrates beneficial effects for stroke patients, though its efficacy varies due to the complexity of patient conditions and disease progression. Unsupervised machine learning could be the optimal solution for identifying target patients for transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment.

Methods: We collected data from ischaemic stroke patients treated with rTMS. Unsupervised machine learning methods, including K-means and Hierarchical Clustering, were used to explore the clinical characteristics of patients suitable for rTMS. We then utilized a prospective observational cohort to validate the effect of selected characteristics. For the validated cohort, outcomes included the presence of motor evoked potentials (MEP), favorable functional outcomes (FFO), and changes in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at 3 and 6 months.

Results: Hierarchical clustering methods revealed that patients in the better prognosis group were more likely to take statins. The validated cohort was grouped based on statin intake. Patients taking statins exhibited a higher rate of MEP (p = 0.006), a higher rate of FFO at 3 months (p = 0.003) and 6 months (p = 0.021), and a more significant change in FMA (p < 0.001) at both 3 and 6 months. Statin intake was associated with FFO and changes in FMA at 3 and 6 months. This relationship persisted across all subgroups for FMA changes and some FFO subgroups.

Conclusion: Stroke patients undergoing rTMS treatment taking statins exhibited greater MEP, FFO, and changes in FMA. Statin intake was associated with a better prognosis in these patients.

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic neuromuscular disease leading to significant disease burden. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of MG in Taiwan.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Prevalent patients with MG diagnosis (either ocular or generalized MG) from 2013 to 2019 were identified, and 2813 patients with initial MG diagnosis from 2014 to 2019 were further defined as the incident cohort. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and the occurrence of MG-related events were analyzed.

Results: The number of prevalent patients with MG increased from 4476 in 2013 to 5752 in 2019, with the prevalence rate increasing from 19 to 24 per 100,000 population. The incidence rate also slightly increased from 1.9 to 2.3 per 100,000 population during the study period. Almost all incident patients (99%, n = 2791) received MG-related treatment during the follow-up period. Among 1876 patients who received monotherapy as their initial treatment in the outpatient setting, the mean time from the index date to initial treatment was 48.8 (standard deviation 164.3) days, and most patients received acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (88.5%, n = 1661) as their initial treatment. During the first year after the index date, 133 (4.7%) incident patients experienced their first myasthenic crisis, and 96.2% of these events occurred within 3 months.

Conclusion: The prevalence of MG increased steadily in Taiwan, and the treatment of patients with MG was consistent with guidelines. Despite a high treatment rate, patients still experienced MG-related events, highlighting the limitation of current treatments and emphasizing the need for early intervention and novel treatment approaches.

Introduction: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv, v for variant) amyloidosis is a rare, progressive, fatal disease with multisystem manifestations, caused by pathogenic variants in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. Vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic that results in rapid TTR knockdown, improved neuropathy and quality of life (QOL) versus external placebo in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the phase 3 HELIOS-A study (NCT03759379). This post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of baseline neuropathy severity on response to vutrisiran treatment.

Methods: Patients were randomized (3:1) to vutrisiran (n = 122; 25 mg subcutaneous injection once every 3 months) or patisiran (n = 42; 0.3 mg/kg intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks), which served as a reference group. In this post hoc analysis, patients were grouped into quartiles of increasing baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS): Quartile (Q)1 ≥ 5.0 to ≤ 20.5; Q2 > 20.5 to ≤ 44.1; Q3 > 44.1 to ≤ 73.1; Q4 > 73.1 to ≤ 127.0. Mean change from baseline to Month 18 was summarized by quartile for a range of efficacy endpoints.

Results: Across all baseline NIS quartiles, vutrisiran demonstrated benefit versus external placebo in measures of neuropathy severity (modified NIS + 7), QOL (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy), disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale), gait speed (10-m walk test), and nutritional status (modified body mass index). Overall, patients in lower versus higher NIS quartiles (less severe neuropathy) at baseline maintained better scores at Month 18. The external placebo group progressively worsened in all measures at Month 18.

Conclusions: Vutrisiran demonstrated benefit in neurologic function and other key efficacy measures versus external placebo across all four baseline neuropathy severity quartiles. Patients initiating vutrisiran earlier in their disease course retained the highest neurologic function level after 18 months, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03759379.

With the increase in the number of cases of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of people living with HIV (PLWH) showing abnormal behavior, cognitive impairment or abnormal movements should be actively screened for the antibody panel of AE. Early recognition and treatment can prevent severe seizures or coma and markedly improve the prognosis of patients. The first-line immunotherapy for AE includes intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin. However, whether long-time immunosuppressive maintenance therapy is needed is debated. For PLWH, immunosuppressive therapy and even steroids could be more challenging. Here, we review and summarize the clinical characteristics often reported cases and report one case from our center to improve the diagnosis and treatment of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis in PLWH.

Introduction: Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor used to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) and chorea associated with Huntington disease (HD). To enhance detection of safety signals across individual trials, integrated safety analyses of deutetrabenazine in TD and HD chorea were conducted.

Methods: For TD, safety data were integrated from two 12-week pivotal studies (ARM-TD and AIM-TD) and through week 15 of the open-label extension (OLE) study (RIM-TD). Data were analyzed by deutetrabenazine treatment group and placebo. For HD, safety data were integrated from the 12-week pivotal study (First-HD) and through week 15 of the OLE study (ARC-HD) for patients previously receiving placebo. Integrated deutetrabenazine data were compared with placebo from the pivotal study.

Results: For TD, deutetrabenazine (n = 384) was generally well tolerated compared with placebo (n = 130). Adverse event (AE) incidence was numerically higher in the response-driven deutetrabenazine vs the fixed-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, respectively (any AE, 59.5% vs 44.4-50.0% and 53.8%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 18.1-25.0% and 30.8%). Serious AEs were reported for 2.8-8.3% of patients in the deutetrabenazine groups and 6.9% in the placebo group. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included headache, somnolence, nausea, anxiety, fatigue, dry mouth, and diarrhea. AE incidence was higher during the titration vs maintenance periods. For HD, AE incidence was numerically higher with deutetrabenazine (n = 84) vs placebo (n = 45; any AE, 64.3% vs 60.0%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 26.7%); serious AEs were reported for similar proportions for the deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, 2.4% and 2.2%, respectively. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included irritability, fall, depression, dry mouth, and fatigue.

Conclusions: Data from an integrated analysis of studies in TD and an integrated analysis of studies of chorea in HD showed that deutetrabenazine has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated across indications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02291861, NCT02195700, NCT01795859, NCT02198794, NCT01897896.

This pragmatic review synthesises the current understanding of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies (pDLB) and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (pAD), including clinical presentations, neuropsychological profiles, neuropsychiatric symptoms, biomarkers, and indications for disease management. The core clinical features of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)-parkinsonism, complex visual hallucinations, cognitive fluctuations, and REM sleep behaviour disorder are common prodromal symptoms. Supportive clinical features of pDLB include severe neuroleptic sensitivity, as well as autonomic and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The neuropsychological profile in mild cognitive impairment attributable to Lewy body pathology (MCI-LB) tends to include impairment in visuospatial skills and executive functioning, distinguishing it from MCI due to AD, which typically presents with impairment in memory. pDLB may present with cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms, and/or recurrent episodes of delirium, indicating that it is not necessarily synonymous with MCI-LB. Imaging, fluid and other biomarkers may play a crucial role in differentiating pDLB from pAD. The current MCI-LB criteria recognise low dopamine transporter uptake using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), loss of REM atonia on polysomnography, and sympathetic cardiac denervation using meta-iodobenzylguanidine SPECT as indicative biomarkers with slowing of dominant frequency on EEG among others as supportive biomarkers. This review also highlights the emergence of fluid and skin-based biomarkers. There is little research evidence for the treatment of pDLB, but pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for DLB may be discussed with patients. Non-pharmacological interventions such as diet, exercise, and cognitive stimulation may provide benefit, while evaluation and management of contributing factors like medications and sleep disturbances are vital. There is a need to expand research across diverse patient populations to address existing disparities in clinical trial participation. In conclusion, an early and accurate diagnosis of pDLB or pAD presents an opportunity for tailored interventions, improved healthcare outcomes, and enhanced quality of life for patients and care partners.