Neurology and Therapy最新文献

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv, v for variant) is a genetic disorder characterized by the deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein in tissues, resulting in progressive dysfunction of multiple organs, including the nervous system, heart, kidneys, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Noninvasive serum biomarkers have become key tools for diagnosing and monitoring ATTRv. This review examines the role of available biomarkers for neurological, cardiac, renal, gastrointestinal, and multisystemic involvement in ATTRv. A thorough understanding of these biomarkers is essential for effective disease management and therapeutic monitoring.

Introduction: Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug-drug interaction study with an oral contraceptive was conducted post-approval.

Methods: The phase I, fixed-sequence multicenter study involved two periods with 24 patients with schizophrenia, aiming to evaluate the effect of CAR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 μg levonorgestrel (LNG). In period A, a single dose of COC alone was administered on day 1. In period B, the highest therapeutic dose of 6 mg CAR was administered once daily from day 4, and a second dose of COC was given concomitantly on day 31.

Results: Overall, CAR had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of the COC. The terminal half-life and the time of maximum plasma concentration of EE and LNG were not altered by CAR co-administration. The highest difference observed was a decrease of 14% in the maximum plasma concentration of EE, with only slight deviation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test/reference ratio (77.09-96.81) from the generally accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%, which is not considered clinically relevant. Confidence intervals of all other exposure measures were within the 80-125% range for both EE and LNG.

Conclusions: According to these results, hormonal contraceptives can be considered effective during CAR treatment.

Trial registration: Trial registration number (EudraCT) 2018-003722-80.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) have a profound impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), with progressive declines occurring as the disease advances. This systematic review aims to summarize the published evidence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals with MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia. Comprehensive searches were conducted across five major databases to identify studies reporting on utility values, disutilities, and QoL measures in these patient populations. A total of 23 studies were included that utilized various QoL assessment tools, including EQ-5D (n = 14), SF-36/SF-12 (n = 4), and QOL-AD (n = 11). Reported EQ-5D scores ranged from 0.81 to 0.92 for patients with MCI and from 0.67 to 0.85 for those with mild AD, indicating a noticeable decline in QoL as the disease progresses. QOL-AD scores ranged from 33.8 to 42.5 for MCI and from 32.4 to 38.1 for mild AD, equally reflecting the greater impairment in QoL with disease advancement. Interventions were generally associated with smaller declines in PROs compared to placebo, suggesting a positive impact of treatment in mitigating QoL deterioration. The findings underscore the significant QoL differences between MCI and mild AD, emphasizing the potential benefit of early intervention to preserve QoL and delay disease progression. This review highlights the importance of continued research to better understand QoL in patients with MCI and mild AD dementia, particularly in terms of capturing comprehensive patient-reported outcomes and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions over time. These findings can contribute to a more informed approach in clinical practice and support decision-making in the management of early-stage AD.

Background: Limited information is available on patients' experience living with Huntington's disease (HD). The primary objective of this study was to assess the health-related quality of life and well being of patients with HD.

Methods: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 hospitals-based movement disorders units in Spain. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, genetically HD diagnosed [with a diagnostic confidence level score of 4, and an Independence Scale (IS) score ≥ 70] were included. The primary variables were the Huntington's Disease Health-related Quality of Life (HDQLIFE) scores and results of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Secondary outcomes include the Unified HD Rating Scale (UHDRS), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8), Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) and Problem Behaviours Assessment for HD short Version (PBA-S).

Results: A total of 102 patients were included. The mean age (SD) was 53.1 (12.1) years and 56% were male. Most of the patients (99.0%) showed motor symptoms (87.3%), behavioural and psychiatric disturbances (59.8%), or cognitive impairment (20.6%). HDQLIFE domain score means (SD) includes concern with death and dying 45.97 (9.60) end-of-life planning 37.91 (8.84), and meaning and purpose 44.74 (9.05). SWLS score mean was 24.25 (7.33). Depressive symptoms were found in 37.4% of patients and moderate-to-severe feelings of hopelessness in 32.9%. The prevalence of stigma was 55.9% (n = 57).

Conclusion: HD impacted quality of life, with prevalent motor, psychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment. Patient perspectives may provide complementary information to implement specific interventions.

Introduction: Factors influencing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment preferences have been studied among patients but not physicians in the United States (US) and Canada. This study assessed treatment preferences of physicians treating adult patients with ADHD in both countries.

Methods: An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted (October 4-20, 2023) among physicians from Dynata's US and Canadian panel who treated adult patients with ADHD. Preference weights for efficacy (improvement in ADHD symptoms) and safety [risks of adverse events (AEs)] attributes were estimated using a conditional logistic regression model, and were used to calculate the willingness to trade-off and relative importance of the attributes.

Results: Among 510 US and 347 Canadian physicians (64.1% and 69.2% male, respectively), improvement in ADHD symptoms had a significant positive impact, and the risks of AEs (except the risk of feeling jittery in Canada) had a significant negative impact on physician preferences for ADHD treatments. US physicians were willing to tradeoff 0.44, 0.35, 0.20, 0.17, and 0.17 percentage points of improvement in ADHD symptoms to avoid a one-percentage-point risk of insomnia, nausea, feeling jittery, anxiety, and dry mouth, respectively; among Canadian physicians, these were 0.31, 0.21, 0.12, 0.20, and 0.07, respectively. The relative importance of the efficacy versus safety attributes (i.e., the risks of AEs included in the DCE taken together) was 45.5% versus 54.5% in the US and 56.3% versus 43.7% in Canada.

Conclusion: Efficacy was the most important single attribute for physicians treating adult patients with ADHD in both the US and Canada; however, the risks of AEs taken together had greater relative importance than efficacy alone among US but not Canadian physicians. These findings highlight potential discrepancies in physician and patient preferences based on existing evidence and underscore the importance of shared decision-making, which may in turn increase patients' treatment satisfaction.

Introduction: Chorea is the primary manifestation of Huntington's disease. Different clinicians pursue varied approaches to chorea management, and real-world evidence describing them is needed. The objective of this study was to assess the presence and severity of chorea, chorea pharmacotherapy, and treatment practice, and patterns in a large natural-history cohort with Huntington's disease.

Methods: The Enroll-HD research platform Periodic Dataset 5.0 was used to select subjects. Outcomes included demographics, disease-related baseline characteristics (Primary Analysis Set), and treatment patterns (Treatment Analysis Set).

Results: A total of 2590 manifest participants comprised the Primary Analysis Set with 1040 in the Treatment Analysis Set; 96.8% of participants had chorea. Mean Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale scores for Total Maximal Chorea, Total Motor Score, and Total Functional Capacity were 9.6, 39.5, and 7.8, respectively. During the observation period from June 2012 to October 2020, 906 (36.1%) participants received treatment for chorea. Among these, the most common first-line therapies were monotherapy VMAT2 inhibitors (49.9%) and antipsychotics (27.7%), while 7.8% of participants discontinued first-line therapy. Of those receiving VMAT2 inhibitors or antipsychotics as first line, 92% and 84%, respectively, remained on VMAT2 inhibitors or antipsychotics alone or in combination for the duration of the study. The most common second-line treatment was combination therapy.

Conclusions: Only 36.1% of participants with chorea were taking a medication indicated for chorea, and, while 49.9% of treated participants received VMAT2 inhibitors first-line, approximately half were prescribed off-label alternatives. It is unclear why patients with indications for treatment were untreated or why off-label alternatives were prescribed. Future research should elaborate on these observations.

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) poses a significant challenge due to its diverse impact on individuals, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment plans. The financial burden of ASD-related healthcare is substantial, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence and evolving trends.

Methods: This study aims to analyze the prevalence and trends of ASD, treatment patterns, gender differences, and racial-ethnic disparities in the United States from 2017 to 2020, utilizing nationally representative data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). The NSCH, a leading annual national survey, provided rich data on child health. A total of 108,142 participants aged 3-17 years were included, with ASD prevalence assessed based on self-reported diagnoses.

Results: Between 2017 and 2020, ASD prevalence in children aged 3-17 was 2.94% (95% confidence interval: 2.68-3.18). Significant disparities were observed: older age and male gender correlated with higher prevalence, while family income-to-poverty ratio and insurance coverage influenced prevalence. Racial/ethnic disparities existed, with Hispanics showing the highest prevalence. Treatment trends showed stability overall, but age influenced behavioral and medication interventions. The prevalence remained stable from 2017 to 2020, with variations in age groups and a significant increase among non-Hispanic Whites.

Conclusions: This study highlights a higher but stable overall ASD prevalence, with nuanced disparities among different demographic groups. Gender differences persist, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions. Racial-ethnic disparities call for targeted healthcare strategies. The stability in treatment trends underscores the persistent challenge of addressing core ASD symptoms.

Exercise training represents a health behavior for the treatment and management of the multi-faceted manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS). This paper provides a comprehensive overview of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding benefits, safety, participation, and guidelines for exercise training in MS, based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The paper then provides our opinions based on extensive experience regarding challenges for improving and expanding future RCTs that will advance our understanding of exercise training in MS. The comprehensive review of evidence from RCTs indicates that exercise training yields substantial improvements in aerobic and muscle fitness, mobility, fatigue and depression, quality of life, and participation outcomes. There is a non-significant increase in the risk of adverse events or serious adverse events with exercise training compared with control conditions or healthy populations. Rates of adherence and compliance with exercise training (i.e., participation) approximate 80% and 70%, respectively. The current prescriptive guidelines suggest 2-3 days per week of aerobic and resistance exercise training as the minimal dose for safely benefiting from exercise training in MS. We propose 10 important topics as avenues for expanding the body of research and improving its scope for evidence-based practice in MS. Overall, the research on exercise training in MS is strong, but it can get stronger. The expansion and advancement of evidence are critical for moving exercise training into the clinical armamentarium of MS disease treatment and management.

Introduction: Lymphocyte depletion via anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is an effective treatment strategy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) but is associated with infusion/injection-associated reactions (IARs) and autoimmune-related adverse events (AEs). Gatralimab is a next-generation humanized anti-CD52 mAb.

Methods: Two first-in-human trials were conducted in participants with progressive MS to assess the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of gatralimab administered via subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) routes, and to determine the effect of different comedication regimes on IARs to SC gatralimab. A Phase 1 trial (NCT02282826) included double-blind, placebo-controlled sequential ascending single IV (1, 3.5, and 12 mg) and SC (12, 36, and 60 mg) dose groups. A Phase 1b trial (NCT02977533) involved five groups who received SC gatralimab (36, 48, or 60 mg) and different comedications. A long-term safety (LTS) study (NCT02313285) examined safety and pharmacodynamics over 4 years.

Results: Gatralimab produced depletion of lymphocytes (dose-dependently) and CD4+ regulatory T cells, with partial repopulation to normal values by approximately 12 months. Peak serum gatralimab concentrations followed dose-proportionality and were delayed by 6.0-7.5 days following SC administration. Treatment-emergent AEs, including IARs, were reported for most participants but were generally of mild or moderate severity, and treatment-emergent serious AEs were mostly MS-related. Methylprednisolone and antihistamine comedications were associated with reduced incidence of fevers and skin and subcutaneous tissue AEs, respectively. During the LTS study, one participant (3.0%) experienced an autoimmune-related AE (Basedow's disease), and subsequently died from pulmonary sepsis deemed unrelated to gatralimab by the investigator.

Conclusions: These data show that gatralimab achieves the desired pharmacodynamic effect of lymphocyte depletion followed by repopulation, and has an acceptable safety profile, including low risk of non-MS autoimmunity. Although gatralimab is no longer in development for MS, insights from these trials may inform the development of comedication regimes of future anti-CD52 mAbs and subcutaneous formulations of other lymphocyte-depleting mAbs.

Trial registration: NCT02282826, NCT02977533, NCT02313285.

As the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its impact on healthcare systems increase, developing tools for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression is a priority. Recent technological advancements have allowed for the development of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) to aid in the diagnosis of AD, but many questions remain regarding the clinical implementation of these BBMs. This review outlines the historical timeline of AD BBM development. It highlights key breakthroughs that have transformed the perspective of AD BBMs from theoretically ideal but unattainable markers, to clinically valid and reliable BBMs with potential for implementation in healthcare settings. Technological advancements like single-molecule detection and mass spectrometry methods have significantly improved assay sensitivity and accuracy. High-throughput, fully automated platforms have potential for clinical use. Despite these advancements, however, significant work is needed before AD BBMs can be implemented in widespread clinical practice. Cutpoints must be established, the influence of chronic conditions and medications on BBM levels must be better understood, and guidelines must be created for healthcare providers related to interpreting and communicating information obtained from AD BBMs. Additionally, the development of BBMs for synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, and cerebrovascular disease may provide better precision medicine approaches to treating AD and related dementia. Future research and collaboration between scientists and physicians are essential to addressing these challenges and further advancing AD BBMs, with the goal of integration in clinical practice.