Pub Date : 2025-12-23eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/5797924
Sisay Kirba, Abdulfetah Abdulkedir Abdosh, Ekram Muhammedasrar, Abraham Fessehaye Sium
Background: Currently, the World Health Organization guidelines recommend universal utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound (defined as ultrasound before 24 weeks) in low-middle income countries. However, there is inadequate evidence on this topic from these countries. Our study aimed to determine the rate of utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who gave birth at three public hospitals in Ethiopia.
Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study conducted on the utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who delivered at public hospitals in Ethiopia in 2020. Data were collected prospectively using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Simple descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, and multiple regression analysis were performed as appropriate. p value less than 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI were used to present result significance.
Results: A total of 385 participants were included in this study. Approximately 67.5% of pregnant mothers had optimally timed 1st ultrasound. Compared to those having antenatal care (ANC) at health centers, those who started their ANC at private clinic were 1.7 times (95 CI: 1.8-7.9) more likely to have optimally timed ANC. Those who had their 1st ANC at private hospital were 3.2 times (95 CI: 1.8-7.9) more likely to have optimally timed 1st prenatal care. Those who had their first ANC at private health institutions and government hospitals were much more likely to have optimally timed 1st prenatal ultrasound with the following AOR for government hospital and private MCH centers: AOR = 7.4 (95 CI: 2.7-23) and AOR = 4.9 (95 CI: 2.8-14.1), respectively. Those who had previous major obstetric problem were 5.2 times (95 CI: 2.7-9.9) more likely to have optimally timed ultrasound than those without major previous obstetric problem.
Conclusion: We found that one-third of pregnant women did not utilize optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound, despite obstetric ultrasound services being accessible at public health institutions. Place of first ANC contact and presence of prior major obstetric complication were associated with utilization of optimally dated first obstetric ultrasound.
{"title":"Universal Utilization of Optimally Timed First Obstetric Ultrasound Among Pregnant Women in a Low-Middle Income Country: A Multicenter Prospective Study.","authors":"Sisay Kirba, Abdulfetah Abdulkedir Abdosh, Ekram Muhammedasrar, Abraham Fessehaye Sium","doi":"10.1155/ogi/5797924","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/5797924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the World Health Organization guidelines recommend universal utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound (defined as ultrasound before 24 weeks) in low-middle income countries. However, there is inadequate evidence on this topic from these countries. Our study aimed to determine the rate of utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who gave birth at three public hospitals in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study conducted on the utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who delivered at public hospitals in Ethiopia in 2020. Data were collected prospectively using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Simple descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, and multiple regression analysis were performed as appropriate. <i>p</i> value less than 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI were used to present result significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 385 participants were included in this study. Approximately 67.5% of pregnant mothers had optimally timed 1<sup>st</sup> ultrasound. Compared to those having antenatal care (ANC) at health centers, those who started their ANC at private clinic were 1.7 times (95 CI: 1.8-7.9) more likely to have optimally timed ANC. Those who had their 1<sup>st</sup> ANC at private hospital were 3.2 times (95 CI: 1.8-7.9) more likely to have optimally timed 1<sup>st</sup> prenatal care. Those who had their first ANC at private health institutions and government hospitals were much more likely to have optimally timed 1<sup>st</sup> prenatal ultrasound with the following AOR for government hospital and private MCH centers: AOR = 7.4 (95 CI: 2.7-23) and AOR = 4.9 (95 CI: 2.8-14.1), respectively. Those who had previous major obstetric problem were 5.2 times (95 CI: 2.7-9.9) more likely to have optimally timed ultrasound than those without major previous obstetric problem.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that one-third of pregnant women did not utilize optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound, despite obstetric ultrasound services being accessible at public health institutions. Place of first ANC contact and presence of prior major obstetric complication were associated with utilization of optimally dated first obstetric ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5797924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/4476955
Sadia Fatema Kabir, Muhammad Ashik-Ur-Rahman, Abdur Rahman, Md Afzal Hossen, Rowfun Rahman, Farhana Huq, Mohibbul Haque, Junnatul Fardous Marfi, Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader
Background: Despite its availability, cervical cancer screening services continue to remain underutilized in many regions. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women in the north-central area of Bangladesh.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, between May and October 2022, women aged 30-60 years attending a tertiary care hospital in Gazipur district were approached for inclusion. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using a semistructured questionnaire. A total of 252 women were consecutively recruited within the study period. The self-reported screening practice was recorded and verified by matching with identification numbers provided for screening by the hospital, and reasons for nonutilization were also collected.
Results: Only 12 women (4.76%) had ever been screened for cervical cancer. Lower knowledge scores (OR: 0.26 and 95% CI: 0.08-0.95) were associated with higher odds of nonutilization of cervical cancer screening services on multivariable analysis. Despite high awareness of symptoms and risk factors, only 15.08% knew that screening prevents cancer. The main reasons for not getting screened were fear of pain (98.33%) and feeling shy (52.50%).
Conclusion: Awareness-increasing programs are recommended to improve the utilization of cervical cancer screening among women.
{"title":"Factors Associated With Low Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Gazipur, Bangladesh.","authors":"Sadia Fatema Kabir, Muhammad Ashik-Ur-Rahman, Abdur Rahman, Md Afzal Hossen, Rowfun Rahman, Farhana Huq, Mohibbul Haque, Junnatul Fardous Marfi, Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader","doi":"10.1155/ogi/4476955","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/4476955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its availability, cervical cancer screening services continue to remain underutilized in many regions. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women in the north-central area of Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, between May and October 2022, women aged 30-60 years attending a tertiary care hospital in Gazipur district were approached for inclusion. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using a semistructured questionnaire. A total of 252 women were consecutively recruited within the study period. The self-reported screening practice was recorded and verified by matching with identification numbers provided for screening by the hospital, and reasons for nonutilization were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 12 women (4.76%) had ever been screened for cervical cancer. Lower knowledge scores (OR: 0.26 and 95% CI: 0.08-0.95) were associated with higher odds of nonutilization of cervical cancer screening services on multivariable analysis. Despite high awareness of symptoms and risk factors, only 15.08% knew that screening prevents cancer. The main reasons for not getting screened were fear of pain (98.33%) and feeling shy (52.50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awareness-increasing programs are recommended to improve the utilization of cervical cancer screening among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4476955"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767436/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 at King Salman Armed Forces Hospital in Tabuk and examine the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 infection and these outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled COVID-19-positive pregnant women. Demographic and obstetric information, clinical characteristics (including symptoms and preexisting comorbid conditions), and maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from medical records, reviewed, and analyzed.
Results: The study included 138 COVID-19-positive women, with the majority of cases diagnosed in the third trimester (85.5%). Assessment of the severity of COVID-19 infection showed that a large proportion were asymptomatic (39.1%) or had mild disease (39.9%), while 14.5% had moderate disease and 6.5% experienced severe illness. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes included preeclampsia (5.1%), gestational diabetes (4.3%), placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes (2.9% each), maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission (1.4%), preterm births (12.3%), low birth weight (15.2%), and neonatal ICU admission (10.1%). Additionally, the incidences of preeclampsia and maternal ICU admission were significantly higher in women with severe COVID-19 compared to those with milder or asymptomatic cases (p = 0.004 each). Neonatal ICU admission showed the highest incidence (33.3%) among severe cases (p = 0.031). Asthma was significantly linked to a higher risk of neonatal ICU admission (23.1% vs. 7.1%). Diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased rate of maternal ICU admission (13.3% vs. 0%). Hypertension showed significant associations with elevated rates of preeclampsia (35.7% vs. 1.6%), maternal ICU admission (14.3% vs. 0%), and neonatal ICU admission (35.7% vs. 7.3%).
Conclusion: COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was associated with several adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, low birth weight, and increased ICU admissions. Severe maternal disease and existing comorbidities further elevated the risks of complications for both mother and newborn.
{"title":"Retrospective Cohort Study of Pregnancy Maternal Outcomes of Women With COVID-19 in King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Abdulrahman Wasel Koja, Rofayda Mansour Ahmed Mohamad, Mubarak Saleh Almarjan, Mayar Hamed Albakri","doi":"10.1155/ogi/3287655","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/3287655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 at King Salman Armed Forces Hospital in Tabuk and examine the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 infection and these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study enrolled COVID-19-positive pregnant women. Demographic and obstetric information, clinical characteristics (including symptoms and preexisting comorbid conditions), and maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from medical records, reviewed, and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 138 COVID-19-positive women, with the majority of cases diagnosed in the third trimester (85.5%). Assessment of the severity of COVID-19 infection showed that a large proportion were asymptomatic (39.1%) or had mild disease (39.9%), while 14.5% had moderate disease and 6.5% experienced severe illness. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes included preeclampsia (5.1%), gestational diabetes (4.3%), placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes (2.9% each), maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission (1.4%), preterm births (12.3%), low birth weight (15.2%), and neonatal ICU admission (10.1%). Additionally, the incidences of preeclampsia and maternal ICU admission were significantly higher in women with severe COVID-19 compared to those with milder or asymptomatic cases (<i>p</i> = 0.004 each). Neonatal ICU admission showed the highest incidence (33.3%) among severe cases (<i>p</i> = 0.031). Asthma was significantly linked to a higher risk of neonatal ICU admission (23.1% vs. 7.1%). Diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased rate of maternal ICU admission (13.3% vs. 0%). Hypertension showed significant associations with elevated rates of preeclampsia (35.7% vs. 1.6%), maternal ICU admission (14.3% vs. 0%), and neonatal ICU admission (35.7% vs. 7.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was associated with several adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, low birth weight, and increased ICU admissions. Severe maternal disease and existing comorbidities further elevated the risks of complications for both mother and newborn.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3287655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767420/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: To validate previous age subgrouping methods and provide an optimal age reference for women planning to delay in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Methods: From July 2014 to March 2018, 3012 patients that received IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were continuously recruited in this retrospective, single-center study. We analyzed the relationships of baseline characteristics and IVF outcomes. A smooth fitting curve depicting the association of age and live birth was plotted using the generalized additive model (GAM) method. We also evaluated the association of age and live birth among different age groups (> 20, ≤ 35; > 35, ≤ 37; > 37, ≤ 40; and > 40).
Results: Age, duration of infertility, and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were significantly related to the live birth rate. The adjusted Odd Ratio (OR) value of age was 0.95 (P < 0.001), indicating the higher occurrence of no live birth with age increasing. The fitting curve showed that the live birth rate decreased with age. And 35.5 (34.5-36.5) was identified as the inflection point of the curve. The slopes before 35.5 and after 35.5 were significantly different (0.9 [0.9, 1.0], P < 0.001). When ≤ 35, live birth rate did not vary with age. For the ages of 35-37 and 37-40, the occurrence of negative outcome increased with age (aOR: 0.73 [0.53, 0.99], 0.80 [0.65, 1.00]; P = 0.0441, 0.0465, respectively).
Conclusion: The age of 35 can be referred to as the safe time point when the IVF success rate does not decline with age. And the risk of IVF failure increases rapidly in the period of 35-37 and 37-40.
{"title":"When to Choose In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) When Postponing Conceiving: The Age-Related Risk of IVF Failure at an Advanced Age.","authors":"Zhiyan Chen, Duoduo Zhang, Zhengyi Sun, Qi Yu, Chenyang Zhao, ChangZhong Li","doi":"10.1155/ogi/2407539","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/2407539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To validate previous age subgrouping methods and provide an optimal age reference for women planning to delay in vitro fertilization (IVF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2014 to March 2018, 3012 patients that received IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were continuously recruited in this retrospective, single-center study. We analyzed the relationships of baseline characteristics and IVF outcomes. A smooth fitting curve depicting the association of age and live birth was plotted using the generalized additive model (GAM) method. We also evaluated the association of age and live birth among different age groups (> 20, ≤ 35; > 35, ≤ 37; > 37, ≤ 40; and > 40).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, duration of infertility, and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were significantly related to the live birth rate. The adjusted Odd Ratio (OR) value of age was 0.95 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), indicating the higher occurrence of no live birth with age increasing. The fitting curve showed that the live birth rate decreased with age. And 35.5 (34.5-36.5) was identified as the inflection point of the curve. The slopes before 35.5 and after 35.5 were significantly different (0.9 [0.9, 1.0], <i>P</i> < 0.001). When ≤ 35, live birth rate did not vary with age. For the ages of 35-37 and 37-40, the occurrence of negative outcome increased with age (aOR: 0.73 [0.53, 0.99], 0.80 [0.65, 1.00]; <i>P</i> = 0.0441, 0.0465, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The age of 35 can be referred to as the safe time point when the IVF success rate does not decline with age. And the risk of IVF failure increases rapidly in the period of 35-37 and 37-40.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2407539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/3096143
Riko Araki, Masahito Hitosugi, Kentaro Takahashi
Background: No studies have effectively clarified the relationship between uterine contractions and the act of acceleration or driving behaviors in pregnant women.
Aims: To confirm the effect of driving a motor vehicle on physiological changes in pregnant women, we examined uterine contractions while driving.
Materials and methods: Seventeen pregnant women with a gestational age of 30-35 weeks were enrolled in this study. Uterine contractions were monitored remotely using a mobile delivery monitoring device. Triaxial acceleration of the vehicle, vehicle velocity, and vehicle kinematics were monitored using a driving recorder.
Results: The average number of uterine contractions per 30 min in all participants was 1.0 (range, 0.26-2.0). When comparing the median vehicle velocity during a uterine contraction with that when there were no contractions, no significant difference was found (23 km/hour vs. 31 km/hour, p = 0.36). The prevalence of low velocity (20 km/hour or less) was significantly higher, and that of higher velocity (50 km/hour or more) was lower during a uterine contraction than with no contractions (p = 0.023 and 0.012, respectively). When comparing resultant vehicle acceleration, no significant differences were found between women with uterine contractions and those with no contractions. The distributions were similar before and immediately before a uterine contraction and with no contractions.
Conclusions: Driving a motor vehicle should be considered a normal activity of daily life in pregnant women and seems unlikely to predispose to preterm birth.
背景:目前尚无研究有效阐明孕妇子宫收缩与加速行为或驾驶行为之间的关系。目的:为了确认驾驶机动车对孕妇生理变化的影响,我们检测了驾车时子宫收缩。材料与方法:17例孕周30-35周的孕妇入选本研究。使用移动分娩监测装置远程监测子宫收缩。使用驾驶记录仪监测车辆的三轴加速度、车辆速度和车辆运动学。结果:所有参与者平均每30分钟子宫收缩次数为1.0次(范围0.26-2.0)。子宫收缩时与无宫缩时的车速中位数比较,差异无统计学意义(23 km/h vs 31 km/h, p = 0.36)。子宫收缩时低速(20km /h以下)的发生率显著高于无宫缩时,高速(50km /h以上)的发生率显著低于无宫缩时(p = 0.023和0.012)。当比较由此产生的车辆加速度时,在子宫收缩的妇女和没有子宫收缩的妇女之间没有发现显著差异。子宫收缩前、紧接前和无宫缩时的分布相似。结论:驾驶机动车应被视为孕妇日常生活的正常活动,似乎不太可能导致早产。
{"title":"Motor Vehicle Driving During Pregnancy Does Not Influence Uterine Contractions.","authors":"Riko Araki, Masahito Hitosugi, Kentaro Takahashi","doi":"10.1155/ogi/3096143","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/3096143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No studies have effectively clarified the relationship between uterine contractions and the act of acceleration or driving behaviors in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To confirm the effect of driving a motor vehicle on physiological changes in pregnant women, we examined uterine contractions while driving.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventeen pregnant women with a gestational age of 30-35 weeks were enrolled in this study. Uterine contractions were monitored remotely using a mobile delivery monitoring device. Triaxial acceleration of the vehicle, vehicle velocity, and vehicle kinematics were monitored using a driving recorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of uterine contractions per 30 min in all participants was 1.0 (range, 0.26-2.0). When comparing the median vehicle velocity during a uterine contraction with that when there were no contractions, no significant difference was found (23 km/hour vs. 31 km/hour, <i>p</i> = 0.36). The prevalence of low velocity (20 km/hour or less) was significantly higher, and that of higher velocity (50 km/hour or more) was lower during a uterine contraction than with no contractions (<i>p</i> = 0.023 and 0.012, respectively). When comparing resultant vehicle acceleration, no significant differences were found between women with uterine contractions and those with no contractions. The distributions were similar before and immediately before a uterine contraction and with no contractions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Driving a motor vehicle should be considered a normal activity of daily life in pregnant women and seems unlikely to predispose to preterm birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3096143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767404/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/5544073
Zeyad Mohammed Abualiat, Joud Sami Makki, Shahad Mubarak Aljebeli, Rawan Othman Bamousa, Orjowan Zuhair Alamri, Alwaten Fahad Alabdullah, Haya Al Fozan
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of the study is to compare the rate of pregnancy and live birth rate in infertile couples with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) treated with either fresh or frozen sperms in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. It is already known that the use of frozen sperm in ICSI cycles is considered favorable and is reported to have no significant difference in outcomes when compared to fresh sperm. However, there is still an ongoing debate about the superiority of fresh or frozen-thawed spermatozoa in men with NOA, particularly in the context of Saudi Arabia where this subject has not been previously investigated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the in vitro fertilization (IVF) unit at KAMC-R, Ministry of National Guard Hospital Affairs (MNGHA) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It includes couples who underwent ICSI cycles throughout four years (2019-2022), provided that they had no female infertility causes. A checklist was prepared to collect data from patients' medical records.</p><p><strong>Participants setting and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 230 infertile couples who underwent ICSI cycles between 2019 and 2022. We compared pregnancy, live birth, and overall success rates in cycles using fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm, controlling for factors like age, infertility type, and hormone levels. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, Student's <i>t</i> tests, and Mann-Whitney tests to compare outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 231 women were included. Their mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 31.5 ± 5.4. Almost two-thirds (67.5%) had primary infertility. Regarding the type of sperms used in intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fresh sperms represented 57.1%, while the remaining 42.9% were frozen sperms. Rates of pregnancy, live births, ectopic pregnancy, and abortion were 32.5%, 23.5%, 3.5%, and 5.7%, respectively. Overall, the success rate of ICSI was 29.8%. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher using fresh spermatozoa in ICSI than frozen spermatozoa (37.9% vs. 25.3%), <i>p</i>=0.043. Similarly, live births and overall successful outcome rates of using fresh spermatozoa in ICSI were significantly higher than those of frozen spermatozoa (28.8% and 34.8% vs. 16% and 22.6%), <i>p</i>=0.025 and 0.048, respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study demonstrated an association between fresh sperm use and higher success rates, but it did not prove causality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When both fresh and frozen sperm were used, the rates of pregnancy, live birth, and overall success in ICSI were higher in fresh sperm. Additionally, younger males and females showed a greater likelihood of successful ICSI outcomes. There is a potential benefit of using fresh sperm in ICSI for this specific patient group but highlights the
目的:本研究的主要目的是比较在卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期中使用新鲜或冷冻精子治疗非阻塞性无精子症(NOA)的不孕夫妇的妊娠率和活产率。众所周知,在ICSI周期中使用冷冻精子被认为是有利的,据报道,与新鲜精子相比,冷冻精子的结果没有显著差异。然而,关于新鲜或冷冻解冻精子对NOA男性的优势仍存在争议,特别是在沙特阿拉伯的背景下,这个问题以前没有进行过调查。设计:本回顾性队列研究在沙特阿拉伯利雅得国民警卫队医院事务部(MNGHA) KAMC-R的体外受精(IVF)部门进行。它包括在四年内(2019-2022年)进行ICSI周期的夫妇,前提是他们没有女性不育的原因。准备了一份清单,从病人的医疗记录中收集数据。参与者设置和方法:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2019年至2022年间接受ICSI周期的230对不孕夫妇的数据。在控制年龄、不育类型和激素水平等因素的情况下,我们比较了使用新鲜睾丸精子和冷冻解冻睾丸精子的怀孕、活产和总成功率。统计分析包括卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、学生t检验和Mann-Whitney检验来比较组间结果。结果:共纳入231名女性。平均±标准差(SD)年龄为31.5±5.4岁。几乎三分之二(67.5%)为原发性不孕症。就卵胞浆内单精子注射使用的精子类型而言,新鲜精子占57.1%,其余42.9%为冷冻精子。妊娠率为32.5%,活产率为23.5%,异位妊娠率为3.5%,流产率为5.7%。总体而言,ICSI成功率为29.8%。使用新鲜精子进行ICSI的受孕率明显高于冷冻精子(37.9% vs. 25.3%), p=0.043。同样,在ICSI中使用新鲜精子的活产率和总成功率显著高于冷冻精子(28.8%和34.8% vs. 16%和22.6%),p分别=0.025和0.048。局限性:该研究证明了新鲜精子的使用与更高的成功率之间的联系,但它没有证明因果关系。结论:冷冻和新鲜精子同时使用时,新鲜精子的受孕率、活产率和ICSI的总体成功率更高。此外,年轻的男性和女性更有可能成功进行ICSI。对于这一特定的患者群体,在ICSI中使用新鲜精子有潜在的好处,但强调需要进一步的研究来巩固这些发现,并探索观察到的差异背后的原因。这项研究增加了NOA男性ICSI的知识体系,并强调需要进一步研究以完善临床实践并改善不育夫妇的结果。
{"title":"Comparison of Pregnancy Rate and Live Birth Rate of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles Using Fresh Versus Frozen-Thawed Testicular Sperm.","authors":"Zeyad Mohammed Abualiat, Joud Sami Makki, Shahad Mubarak Aljebeli, Rawan Othman Bamousa, Orjowan Zuhair Alamri, Alwaten Fahad Alabdullah, Haya Al Fozan","doi":"10.1155/ogi/5544073","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/5544073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of the study is to compare the rate of pregnancy and live birth rate in infertile couples with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) treated with either fresh or frozen sperms in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. It is already known that the use of frozen sperm in ICSI cycles is considered favorable and is reported to have no significant difference in outcomes when compared to fresh sperm. However, there is still an ongoing debate about the superiority of fresh or frozen-thawed spermatozoa in men with NOA, particularly in the context of Saudi Arabia where this subject has not been previously investigated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the in vitro fertilization (IVF) unit at KAMC-R, Ministry of National Guard Hospital Affairs (MNGHA) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It includes couples who underwent ICSI cycles throughout four years (2019-2022), provided that they had no female infertility causes. A checklist was prepared to collect data from patients' medical records.</p><p><strong>Participants setting and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 230 infertile couples who underwent ICSI cycles between 2019 and 2022. We compared pregnancy, live birth, and overall success rates in cycles using fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm, controlling for factors like age, infertility type, and hormone levels. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, Student's <i>t</i> tests, and Mann-Whitney tests to compare outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 231 women were included. Their mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 31.5 ± 5.4. Almost two-thirds (67.5%) had primary infertility. Regarding the type of sperms used in intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fresh sperms represented 57.1%, while the remaining 42.9% were frozen sperms. Rates of pregnancy, live births, ectopic pregnancy, and abortion were 32.5%, 23.5%, 3.5%, and 5.7%, respectively. Overall, the success rate of ICSI was 29.8%. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher using fresh spermatozoa in ICSI than frozen spermatozoa (37.9% vs. 25.3%), <i>p</i>=0.043. Similarly, live births and overall successful outcome rates of using fresh spermatozoa in ICSI were significantly higher than those of frozen spermatozoa (28.8% and 34.8% vs. 16% and 22.6%), <i>p</i>=0.025 and 0.048, respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study demonstrated an association between fresh sperm use and higher success rates, but it did not prove causality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When both fresh and frozen sperm were used, the rates of pregnancy, live birth, and overall success in ICSI were higher in fresh sperm. Additionally, younger males and females showed a greater likelihood of successful ICSI outcomes. There is a potential benefit of using fresh sperm in ICSI for this specific patient group but highlights the ","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5544073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623106/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145550054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/9983293
Luping Pan, Yuan Xiang, Jinju Guo, Wei Liu, Xia Wang
Background: This study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with Stage IA ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing SEER data (2000-2021) to compare the prognosis of Stage IA OCCC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. Competing risks regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified prognostic factors for CSS and OS.
Results: A total of 1422 Stage IA OCCC patients were identified. After PSM, 776 patients (388 in each group) were included. For patients aged ≤ 50 years, chemotherapy was linked to worse CSS (89.5% vs. 96.2%, p=0.007) and OS (89.3% vs. 95.9%, p=0.008). Conversely, in patients aged > 70 years, chemotherapy was associated with improved CSS (93.0% vs. 81.9%, p=0.038) and OS (86.0% vs. 72.4%, p=0.006). These trends remained after PSM. Multivariate analysis showed that chemotherapy had little impact on OS and CSS. Subgroup analysis further indicated that chemotherapy negatively affected CSS and OS in patients aged ≤ 50 years.
Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival outcomes in patients with Stage IA OCCC. However, its effects were age-dependent, with older patients (> 70 years) experiencing improved survival, while younger patients (≤ 50 years) exhibited worse outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies for Stage IA OCCC.
{"title":"Divergent Survival Outcomes With Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IA Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Insights From the SEER Database.","authors":"Luping Pan, Yuan Xiang, Jinju Guo, Wei Liu, Xia Wang","doi":"10.1155/ogi/9983293","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/9983293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with Stage IA ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing SEER data (2000-2021) to compare the prognosis of Stage IA OCCC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. Competing risks regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified prognostic factors for CSS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1422 Stage IA OCCC patients were identified. After PSM, 776 patients (388 in each group) were included. For patients aged ≤ 50 years, chemotherapy was linked to worse CSS (89.5% vs. 96.2%, <i>p</i>=0.007) and OS (89.3% vs. 95.9%, <i>p</i>=0.008). Conversely, in patients aged > 70 years, chemotherapy was associated with improved CSS (93.0% vs. 81.9%, <i>p</i>=0.038) and OS (86.0% vs. 72.4%, <i>p</i>=0.006). These trends remained after PSM. Multivariate analysis showed that chemotherapy had little impact on OS and CSS. Subgroup analysis further indicated that chemotherapy negatively affected CSS and OS in patients aged ≤ 50 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival outcomes in patients with Stage IA OCCC. However, its effects were age-dependent, with older patients (> 70 years) experiencing improved survival, while younger patients (≤ 50 years) exhibited worse outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies for Stage IA OCCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9983293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12578555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145431738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Our study aimed to examine ultrasound and obstetric parameters, explore their interrelationships, and assess their predictive ability in determining the success of labor induction. Methodology: Women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at a gestational age of 40 weeks and 3 days with fetal cephalic presentation, having intact fetal membranes and unfavorable Bishop score (BS < 6) were recruited for the study. Ultrasound examination was performed to measure cervical length (CL), estimated fetal weight (EFW), and Doppler velocimetry of fetal cerebral vessels in each patient before induction. We proposed to combine the variables of CL, EFW, BS, and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) to devise a model for the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL). IOL was performed with intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (3 g gel/0.5 mg dinoprostone) applied 6 h apart if needed, not more than 2 doses, followed by oxytocin infusion for up to 6 h. Successful induction was defined as the initiation of active labor at any stage of the induction process. Results: Among the 70 enrolled women, only 29 (41.4%) women responded to induction. CL, BS, and mean value of fetal MCA PI had significant differences in women who responded from those who did not respond to the IOL. The prediction model for the success of induction with the four variables of MCA PI, BS, and CL has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90.2% (AUC 0.982, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00, p < 0.001) with the upper cutoff of 0.47. EFW showed to have no effect on the outcome parameter. Conclusion: A model comprising MCA PI, CL, and BS has an excellent prediction value to assess the response to IOL in women at term pregnancy. When a single parameter has to be evaluated, CL is the best maternal factor to predict the success of induction.
{"title":"Prediction Model for Successful Induction of Labor by Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery Pulsatility Index and Obstetric Factors in Term Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Vaishali Gautam, Harsha S Gaikwad, Banashree Nath, Mukesh Shukla, Priti Kumari","doi":"10.1155/ogi/7881711","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/7881711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Our study aimed to examine ultrasound and obstetric parameters, explore their interrelationships, and assess their predictive ability in determining the success of labor induction. <b>Methodology:</b> Women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at a gestational age of 40 weeks and 3 days with fetal cephalic presentation, having intact fetal membranes and unfavorable Bishop score (BS < 6) were recruited for the study. Ultrasound examination was performed to measure cervical length (CL), estimated fetal weight (EFW), and Doppler velocimetry of fetal cerebral vessels in each patient before induction. We proposed to combine the variables of CL, EFW, BS, and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) to devise a model for the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL). IOL was performed with intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (3 g gel/0.5 mg dinoprostone) applied 6 h apart if needed, not more than 2 doses, followed by oxytocin infusion for up to 6 h. Successful induction was defined as the initiation of active labor at any stage of the induction process. <b>Results:</b> Among the 70 enrolled women, only 29 (41.4%) women responded to induction. CL, BS, and mean value of fetal MCA PI had significant differences in women who responded from those who did not respond to the IOL. The prediction model for the success of induction with the four variables of MCA PI, BS, and CL has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90.2% (AUC 0.982, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with the upper cutoff of 0.47. EFW showed to have no effect on the outcome parameter. <b>Conclusion:</b> A model comprising MCA PI, CL, and BS has an excellent prediction value to assess the response to IOL in women at term pregnancy. When a single parameter has to be evaluated, CL is the best maternal factor to predict the success of induction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7881711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/ogi/9871215
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2024/7309041.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1155/2024/7309041.]。
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Association of Hormonal Contraceptives with Depression among Women in Reproductive Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1155/ogi/9871215","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/9871215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2024/7309041.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9871215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction/Background: Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. Results: Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (n = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (n = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, p < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, p=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, p=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, p=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, p=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (n = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (n = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (p=0.823). Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.
{"title":"Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.","authors":"Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald","doi":"10.1155/ogi/7202848","DOIUrl":"10.1155/ogi/7202848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction/Background:</b> Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. <b>Results:</b> Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (<i>n</i> = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (<i>n</i> = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, <i>p</i>=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, <i>p</i>=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, <i>p</i>=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, <i>p</i>=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (<i>n</i> = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (<i>p</i>=0.823). <b>Conclusion:</b> This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7202848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}