Obstetrics and Gynecology International最新文献

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a benign condition that can adversely affect women's quality of life. Mesh sacrocolpopexy is an effective surgical treatment for POP, but is considered a complex and risky surgery for obese and elderly women. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of age and obesity on the outcomes of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy cases performed between 2003 and 2021. Data on operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate, perioperative injuries, early and late postoperative complications were collected. Surgical success was evaluated by gynecological examination at each follow-up visit. Results: One hundred seventy subjects were included, of whom 44% were older than 65 years and 58% had a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m². Seventy percent presented stage III uterovaginal prolapse. All patients achieved a good subjective outcome with no reported prolapse with a mean follow-up of 6 years. The rate of de novo stress urinary incontinence was 3.2%. Vaginal implant exposure was found in 4% of cases. A bivariate analysis studying the impact of older age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years) and higher BMI (≥ 25 vs. < 25) on surgical and postoperative outcomes did not show any significant differences between the subgroups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In experienced hands, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be used as a safe and effective procedure for operable patients with POP, even when patients are between 65 and 80 years or have a BMI of 25 kg/m² and above.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) promotes the wound-healing process and reduces pain. Cord blood platelet-rich plasma (CB-PRP), which can be easily collected from the umbilical cord and reapplied to a cesarean section wound, has been proposed to have similar effects as PRP. This paper hypothesizes that CB-PRB would provide beneficial effects in terms of wound healing and pain reduction in women undergoing cesarean section. This study is a randomized controlled trial involving 52 pregnant women who underwent cesarean sections. Participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 26) or the control group (n = 26) at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of Police General Hospital. Cord blood PRP was applied to the subcutaneous layer and the surgical wound immediately following the cesarean section. The efficacy of wound healing was evaluated using the REEDA scale score on days 1 and 3 postoperatively, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was assessed in the 8th week postoperation. The efficacy in reducing pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale on days 1 and 3 postoperatively. The mean REEDA scale on day 1 (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.2561.5 ± 0.256 in the CB-PRP group and 2.5 ± 0.267 in the control group; p=0.009) and the mean VSS score at the 8th week (mean ± SD: 2.577 ± 2.003 in the CB-PRP group and 6.962 ± 2.441 in the control group; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the CB-PRP group than those in the control group. However, there were no differences in Visual Analog Scale values between the two groups. The findings indicate that CB-PRP potentially promotes wound healing following cesarean sections but does not reduce pain. Further research is needed to confirm the beneficial effects of CB-PRP.

Background: Over 768 million cases of COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide, with pregnant women being the most vulnerable members of society during such an infectious disease outbreak. In the United Arab Emirates, there are limited studies explaining the effects of COVID-19 on pregnant women and their fetuses. In this study, the maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 in a tertiary maternal hospital, United Arab Emirates, were examined. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted in a tertiary hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. The study included all pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 infection from April 2020 to September 2021. Results: The study revealed that a higher number of COVID-19-infected pregnant patients presented in their third trimester (69.1%). The comorbidity of body mass index (BMI) had the most effect on the severity/hospitalization status of the patients (p=0.018). In the nonhospitalized group, fever was the most common symptom (26%), whereas in the hospitalized group, cough was the most common symptom (94%). Emergency cesarean delivery was found to be significant (p=0.0007) in hospitalized patients. COVID-19 pneumonia was the prevailing adverse maternal outcome. NICU admission and prematurity were the most frequent neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: In conclusion, our findings show that adverse maternal outcomes, obesity, and mode of delivery were related to COVID-19 severity in pregnant patients. However, there was no effect generally on the adverse fetal outcomes except for jaundice and birth weight.

Background: BRCA1 gene dysfunction seen in epithelial ovarian carcinomas often results from germline mutations, somatic mutations, and promoter methylation. Identification of tumors with loss of BRCA1 protein expression has shown to have therapeutic and prognostic implications. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of BRCA1 protein in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and the associated clinicopathological characteristics. Methods and Results: This was a cross-sectional laboratory-based study that used paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of patients histologically diagnosed with EOC from January 2010 to August 2018. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological confirmation and with immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody MS110 for BRCA1 protein expression. The association between BRCA1 protein expression and independent variables was determined using Pearson's Chi-square test. A total of 104 tissue blocks from patients with EOC were included in the study with a mean age of 48.7 ± 12.8 years. Serous tumors were the most common which comprised 74.0% (77/104) of all the tumors and majority of them 75.3% (58/77) were high grade. Loss of expression of BRCA1 protein expression was found in 33.7% (33/98) of all the cases. There was no statistically significant association between BRCA1 expression and age of patients, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Conclusion: There is a high expression of altered BRCA1 expression in tissues of EOC. Although it has not shown association with age of patients, histology types, and tumor grade, further studies need to assess its influence of the survival of cancer patients with EOC.

Objective: To investigate the impact of counseling interventions, using face-to-face training vs. mobile app for choosing mode of delivery.

Design: A four-armed, randomized, controlled parallel-design trial. Setting. Ebnesina Private Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Population. Pregnant women, between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation (n = 120).

Methods: Pregnant women were randomly assigned in three psycho-educational intervention groups: (1) motivational interviewing via face-to-face training, (2) information, motivation, and behavioral skills model via face-to-face training, (3) the same model via a mobile application, and (4) usual antenatal care (control group). To assess the face-to-face and mobile app training method on women's self-efficacy and intention in choosing a mode of delivery. Main Outcome Measures. Mode of delivery (Cesarean section).

Results: While all three intervention groups showed significant increases in women's self-efficacy and intentions to choose vaginal delivery, the increase was particularly noticeable among those using mobile applications: Before the intervention, self-efficacy and intention Mean ± SD were 77.1 ± 38.6 (CI-95%: [62.72, 91.60]) and 1.10 ± 0.305 (CI-95%: [0.99, 1.21]), respectively. After the intervention, these scores increased to 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]) for self-efficacy and 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87]) for intention. Although 56.7% of women in the intervention groups expressed a preference for vaginal delivery, only 37.5% ultimately pursued this birthing method.

Conclusions: Brief psycho-educational interventions, particularly technology-driven interventions (mobile apps) can increase the likelihood of women choosing vaginal delivery. To enhance the effectiveness of such interventions, they can be conducted in conjunction with interventions for doctors and healthcare providers. This trial is registered with IRCT20151208025431N7.

Introduction: The physiological process by which the fetus and placenta are delivered from the uterus and pass through the vaginal canal for delivery is known as labor. Induction of labor involves deliberately initiating labor before it occurs naturally, using medical interventions or techniques to stimulate contractions and initiate the birthing process.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence the success of labor induction procedures in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January to April 2023. Subject and Methods. This retrospective chart review was conducted at the National Guard Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from the patient chart of those who underwent labor induction from January to April 2023. The collected data were tabulated and cleaned in MS Excel. Final data were transferred to SPSS for subsequent data analysis.

Results: Five hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were analyzed. 52.7% were aged 30 years or below. The most common indication of IOL was post-dated pregnancy (26.2%). 62% were normal deliveries, indicative of IOL success, while 31.1% were cesarean deliveries, indicative of IOL failure. In univariate analysis, women with lower gravidity (≤3) and who had received Propess were associated with cesarean delivery. In a multivariate regression analysis, women who received Prostin and increased parity were identified as the significant independent predictors of IOL success.

Conclusion: IOL's success was dependent primarily on increasing parity and Prostin administration. However, lower gravidity (≤3) and Propess medication could lead to operative procedures among pregnant women. Hence, it is necessary to carefully assess the condition of pregnant women before directing them to IOL.

Considering menstruation as a crucial factor in females' health and fertility, any factor that could change its cycle is important. This study was conducted from April 2021 to October 2022 on females who got 3 doses of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 through different platforms. The participants were requested to provide the trained experts with any changes regarding menstrual cycles after each dose of the vaccine up to 6 months after the booster shots. The disturbances related to the vaccines were identified by the adverse events committee to find possible associations with the applied vaccines. Of 308 women who participated until the end of the study, 22 (7.1%) complained about at least one abnormality in their menstrual patterns. The most common disturbance was metrorrhagia as 10 (48%) incidences followed by menorrhagia as 6 events (24.2%). Notably, the identified complaints were persistent in 59% of the patients. In addition, 14 studied cases developed COVID-19 infection after menstrual disorders. In these cases, COVID-19 could also play a role in the persistence of postvaccine menstrual disturbances. COVID-19 vaccination could affect menstrual cycle in women with no remarkable previous medical history. More longitudinal studies are required regarding this issue.

Introduction: Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) are used for birth control, menstrual disturbances, and premenopausal syndrome. Most women stop using hormonal contraceptives due to changes in their mood. The evidence regarding the association of hormonal contraception with depression shows mixed results. Therefore, we aim to establish the association between the use of hormonal contraception and depressive symptoms.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 326 women of the reproductive age group (15-49 years) attending the family planning unit of the obstetrics and gynecology department of a medical college in Saudi Arabia. Their sociodemographic and medical details along with the current use of any contraceptives (hormonal, nonhormonal, or not using any) with duration were collected. Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) was applied to the women to assess for depression along with its severity, and a BDI score of >16 was taken to denote clinical depression. Women were stratified by type of contraceptive used, and its association with depression category was assessed.

Results: A total of 326 consenting eligible women in the age group of 15-49 years were enrolled in the study of which 165 (50.6%) were currently using a hormonal contraceptive and 49 (15.0%) were using a nonhormonal contraceptive and the rest 112 (34.4%) were not using any contraceptives. There was no significant difference in the mean BDI scores (p=0.79) and degrees of depression (p=0.06) between the HC users and HC nonusers. However, individual symptoms of depression such as sadness (p=0.01), reduced libido (p=0.0002), feelings of pessimism (p=0.02), and failure (p=0.003) were found to be significantly higher in the HC users than non-HC users.

Conclusion: We conclude that there was no significant difference in mean depression scores between groups. However, a few individual symptoms of depression were high in HC users suggesting depression as a potential side effect of hormonal contraceptive use.

Background: This study is to compare the time to pregnancy (TTP) between patients with endometriosis and nonendometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF).Material and Methods.This is an observational retrospective cohort study. We included 291 patients (53 with endometriosis and 238 without endometriosis) achieving biochemical pregnancy, whether singleton or multifetal (serum beta-hCG >5 mIU/mL), between 1st January 2014 and 31st March 2020. We excluded patients with incomplete case notes and those declining participation. Time to pregnancy is the interval between the time when infertility was established to the date of confirmed biochemical pregnancy, expressed in months. Endometriosis diagnosis includes any form of endometriosis through surgical confirmation. A statistical analysis was done through the Mann-Whitney U test. Time to pregnancy was assessed through the Kaplan-Meier test. A p value <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results: Endometriosis patients had a shorter infertility duration (4 years vs. 5 years, p=0.024). Both groups had similar median age and body mass index at presentation. There was no significant difference in the TTP between endometriosis and nonendometriosis groups (57.7 vs. 70.9 months, p=0.060), further confirmed by a Cox regression test incorporating confounders (IVF protocol (OR: 1.482, 95% CI 0.667-3.292, and p=0.334) and type of the cycle (OR 1.071, 95% CI 0.803-1.430, and p=0.640)). The endometriosis group reached the maximum cumulative pregnancy rate at around 169 months postinfertility diagnosis, whilst the nonendometriosis group at around 255 months postinfertility diagnosis.

Conclusion: Time to pregnancy between endometriosis and nonendometriosis is not significantly different. However, infertility among patients with endometriosis tends to be shorter.

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable maternal mortality worldwide. Early identification and prompt management of postpartum haemorrhage improve outcomes. Objective assessment of postpartum blood loss is an important step in identifying postpartum haemorrhage. The Brass-V drape and MaternaWell tray have been designed for routine measurement of postpartum blood loss. The perceived utility and acceptability of these devices to the parturients and birth attendants still begged exploring.

Objective: To assess the perceived usefulness and ease of use of a Brass-V drape versus a MaternaWell tray for the collection of postpartum blood loss.

Methods: We conducted a prospective parallel randomised trial, employing a questionnaire to assess the experiences of birth attendants and birthing women who used these devices. The study was conducted at site B midwife obstetric unit in Khayelitsha Cape Town. Pregnant women presenting in early labour were approached for voluntary participation. After informed consent was obtained, participants were randomly assigned to the Brass-V drape or the MaternaWell tray, which the birth attendant placed after the birth of the baby.

Results: There were 63 participants, of which 33 were assigned to the MaternaWell tray and 30 to the Brass-V drape. Birth attendants indicated a desire to use the MaternaWell tray (30 (90%)) or Brass-V drape (26 (87%)) in future deliveries. The parturients were also in favour of the future use of MaternaWell tray (33 (100%)) and Brass-V drape (28 (93%)). Ease of measurement favoured the Brass V-drape, and ease of placement favoured the MaternaWell tray. Five (8%) participants experienced postpartum haemorrhage, two with the MaternaWell tray and three with the Brass-V drape. One parturient required hospital transfer.

Conclusion: The responses of the birth attendants and parturients were positive. The MaternaWell tray has the benefit of reuse and lower cost and is an acceptable alternative to the Brass-V drape. Both devices aid in the early recognition of postpartum haemorrhage.