Pub Date : 2024-02-02DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109320
Susan Peters
{"title":"Chronic respiratory symptoms observed in US veterans following deployment may not be unique to that population.","authors":"Susan Peters","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109320","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109320","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-02DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109089
Marine Renier, Juliette Hippert, Weiswald Louis-Bastien, Séverine Tual, Matthieu Meryet-Figuiere, Nicolas Vigneron, Elisabeth Marcotullio, Isabelle Baldi, Pierre Lebailly
Background: Ovarian cancer is rare with a poor prognosis and few established risk factors. Hormones and reproductive factors significantly impact its development, suggesting a potential link with endocrine disrupters.
Methods: In the AGRICAN cohort, 59 391 female farmers completed data on lifelong agricultural exposures and reproductive life. Cox models with attained age as timescale (HR and 95% CI) were used. The role of hormonal factors as potential confounders was considered along with specific time windows for exposure (childhood, puberty and menopause). Female farmers were the reference group (for the principal analyses).
Results: Between enrolment (2005-2007) and the end of follow-up (31 December 2017), 262 incident ovarian cancers were identified. An increased risk was observed for females involved in pigs (HR=2.12 (95% CI 1.27 to 3.52)) including during puberty (HR=1.83 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.94)), fruit-growing (HR=2.17 (95% CI 1.09 to 4.30)) and potato seed treatment (HR=2.81 (95% CI 1.29 to 6.09)). Conversely, females born on farms growing grain cereals (HR=0.64 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.90)) or pig-breeding (HR=0.78 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.12)) presented a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Triazine herbicide exposure was not associated with ovarian cancer. The effect of agricultural exposures remained unchanged in multivariate models considering contraception, parity, puberty age, menopause age and body mass index.
Conclusion: This study is the first to assess the association between specific agricultural exposures and ovarian cancer comprehensively. Some of the positive associations observed suggest that some pesticide exposure (especially during puberty) could play a role in the development of ovarian cancer. On the other hand, agricultural exposure during early life could have a protective effect, as observed for lung cancer among farmers. Finally, we did not confirm the previous putative effect of exposure to triazine herbicides.
背景:卵巢癌是一种罕见的癌症,预后较差,且已确定的风险因素很少。激素和生殖因素对卵巢癌的发病有很大影响,这表明卵巢癌可能与内分泌干扰物有关:在 AGRICAN 队列中,有 59 391 名女性农民填写了有关终生农业接触和生育期的数据。采用以年龄为时间尺度的 Cox 模型(HR 和 95% CI)。考虑了作为潜在混杂因素的荷尔蒙因素的作用以及特定的暴露时间窗(童年、青春期和更年期)。女性农民为参照组(用于主要分析):从入学(2005-2007 年)到随访结束(2017 年 12 月 31 日),共发现 262 例卵巢癌。观察发现,养猪(HR=2.12(95% CI 1.27 至 3.52))、青春期(HR=1.83(95% CI 1.13 至 2.94))、水果种植(HR=2.17(95% CI 1.09 至 4.30))和马铃薯种子处理(HR=2.81(95% CI 1.29 至 6.09))的女性患卵巢癌的风险增加。相反,出生在种植谷物(HR=0.64(95% CI 0.46 至 0.90))或养猪(HR=0.78(95% CI 0.55 至 1.12))农场的女性患卵巢癌的风险降低。接触三嗪类除草剂与卵巢癌无关。在考虑了避孕、胎次、青春期年龄、绝经年龄和体重指数的多变量模型中,农业暴露的影响保持不变:这项研究首次全面评估了特定农业暴露与卵巢癌之间的关系。观察到的一些正相关关系表明,接触某些杀虫剂(尤其是在青春期)可能在卵巢癌的发生中起作用。另一方面,正如在农民肺癌中观察到的那样,早年的农业接触可能具有保护作用。最后,我们没有证实之前推测的接触三嗪类除草剂的影响。
{"title":"Agricultural exposure and risk of ovarian cancer in the AGRIculture and CANcer (AGRICAN) cohort.","authors":"Marine Renier, Juliette Hippert, Weiswald Louis-Bastien, Séverine Tual, Matthieu Meryet-Figuiere, Nicolas Vigneron, Elisabeth Marcotullio, Isabelle Baldi, Pierre Lebailly","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109089","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is rare with a poor prognosis and few established risk factors. Hormones and reproductive factors significantly impact its development, suggesting a potential link with endocrine disrupters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the AGRICAN cohort, 59 391 female farmers completed data on lifelong agricultural exposures and reproductive life. Cox models with attained age as timescale (HR and 95% CI) were used. The role of hormonal factors as potential confounders was considered along with specific time windows for exposure (childhood, puberty and menopause). Female farmers were the reference group (for the principal analyses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between enrolment (2005-2007) and the end of follow-up (31 December 2017), 262 incident ovarian cancers were identified. An increased risk was observed for females involved in pigs (HR=2.12 (95% CI 1.27 to 3.52)) including during puberty (HR=1.83 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.94)), fruit-growing (HR=2.17 (95% CI 1.09 to 4.30)) and potato seed treatment (HR=2.81 (95% CI 1.29 to 6.09)). Conversely, females born on farms growing grain cereals (HR=0.64 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.90)) or pig-breeding (HR=0.78 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.12)) presented a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Triazine herbicide exposure was not associated with ovarian cancer. The effect of agricultural exposures remained unchanged in multivariate models considering contraception, parity, puberty age, menopause age and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to assess the association between specific agricultural exposures and ovarian cancer comprehensively. Some of the positive associations observed suggest that some pesticide exposure (especially during puberty) could play a role in the development of ovarian cancer. On the other hand, agricultural exposure during early life could have a protective effect, as observed for lung cancer among farmers. Finally, we did not confirm the previous putative effect of exposure to triazine herbicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139417695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Injuries at work are common and costly for individuals and employers. A common mechanism of workplace injury is through falls, but there have been few epidemiological studies of risk factors. This study aimed to identify patient, work and injury factors associated with injuries causing hospitalisation after falling at work in Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Data came from work-related hospitalised injury admissions, identified by International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Australian Modification codes and compensation status, from Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with same-level falls and falls from height.
Results: This study included 42 176 work-related injury admissions: 8669 (20.6%) fall injuries and 33 507 (79.4%) other injuries. Rates of high falls were more common in males than females (0.44 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.46) vs 0.08 (0.08, 0.09) admissions per 1000 employed), while same-level falls were more common in females than males (0.21 (0.20, 0.22) vs 0.18 (0.17, 0.18)). Patients with same-level fall injuries, relative to all other work injuries, were more likely to be older women, and have at least one chronic condition; falls from height were associated with male sex and construction work and more likely to result in intracranial, internal organ injuries and fractures and longer hospital stay than non-fall injuries.
Conclusion: Work-related falls were common and relatively severe. Same-level falls are relatively likely to occur in older women, the fastest-growing workplace demographic, and therefore the incidence is expected to increase. Comorbidities are an important fall risk factor. Employers could consider industry-relevant high and same-level fall prevention strategies for reducing the workplace injury burden.
目标:工伤很常见,对个人和雇主来说代价高昂。工伤的常见机制是跌倒,但有关风险因素的流行病学研究却很少。本研究旨在确定与澳大利亚维多利亚州因工摔伤住院治疗相关的患者、工作和受伤因素:数据来自2017年7月1日至2022年6月30日期间维多利亚州入院病例数据集(Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset)中的工伤住院病例,这些病例根据《国际疾病和相关健康问题分类》第十版澳大利亚修订版代码和赔偿状况进行识别。研究人员进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与同层跌倒和从高处跌落相关的因素:本研究共纳入 42 176 例工伤入院病例:8669人(20.6%)为跌倒伤害,33507人(79.4%)为其他伤害。男性的高处坠落率高于女性(每 1000 名雇员中 0.44(95% CI:0.43,0.46) vs 0.08(0.08,0.09)),而女性的同高度坠落率高于男性(0.21(0.20,0.22) vs 0.18(0.17,0.18))。与所有其他工伤相比,高处坠落伤患者更可能是老年女性,并且至少患有一种慢性疾病;与非高处坠落伤相比,高处坠落伤与男性性别和建筑工作有关,并且更可能导致颅内、内脏器官损伤和骨折,住院时间也更长:与工作有关的高处坠落很常见,而且相对严重。老年妇女是工作场所人口增长最快的群体,她们发生同高度跌倒的可能性相对较高,因此预计发生率还会增加。合并症是一个重要的跌倒风险因素。雇主可以考虑采取与行业相关的高位和同位跌倒预防策略,以减轻工伤负担。
{"title":"Epidemiology of work-related fall injuries resulting in hospitalisation: individual and work risk factors and severity.","authors":"Win Wah, Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Karen Walker-Bone","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109079","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Injuries at work are common and costly for individuals and employers. A common mechanism of workplace injury is through falls, but there have been few epidemiological studies of risk factors. This study aimed to identify patient, work and injury factors associated with injuries causing hospitalisation after falling at work in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from work-related hospitalised injury admissions, identified by International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Australian Modification codes and compensation status, from Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with same-level falls and falls from height.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 42 176 work-related injury admissions: 8669 (20.6%) fall injuries and 33 507 (79.4%) other injuries. Rates of high falls were more common in males than females (0.44 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.46) vs 0.08 (0.08, 0.09) admissions per 1000 employed), while same-level falls were more common in females than males (0.21 (0.20, 0.22) vs 0.18 (0.17, 0.18)). Patients with same-level fall injuries, relative to all other work injuries, were more likely to be older women, and have at least one chronic condition; falls from height were associated with male sex and construction work and more likely to result in intracranial, internal organ injuries and fractures and longer hospital stay than non-fall injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Work-related falls were common and relatively severe. Same-level falls are relatively likely to occur in older women, the fastest-growing workplace demographic, and therefore the incidence is expected to increase. Comorbidities are an important fall risk factor. Employers could consider industry-relevant high and same-level fall prevention strategies for reducing the workplace injury burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-02DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108988
Dallas S Shi, Jessica L Rinsky, George R Grimes, Sophia K Chiu
Objectives: To describe recent investigations of potential workplace cancer clusters.
Methods: We identified Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) of cancer concerns during 2001-2020. We described information about industry, requestors, cancer characteristics, investigative procedures, and determinations about the presence of a cluster (ie, presence of excess cases, unusual case distribution or exposure).
Results: Of 5754 HHEs, 174 included cancer concerns, comprising 1%-5% of HHEs per year. In 123 HHEs, the cancer cluster concerns involved different cancer primary sites. Investigation procedures varied but included record review (n=63, 36%) and site visits (n=22, 13%). Of 158 HHEs with a cluster determination by investigator(s), 151 (96%) were not considered cancer clusters. In seven HHEs, investigators found evidence of a cluster, but occupational exposure to a carcinogen was not identified.
Conclusions: The proportion of HHEs on workplace cancer cluster concerns remained steady over time; most did not meet the definition of a cluster or uncover an occupational cause. Public health practitioners can use this information to provide updated context when addressing workplace cancer cluster concerns and as motivation to refine investigative approaches. More broadly, this review highlights an opportunity to identify best practices on how to apply community cluster investigation methods to the workplace.
{"title":"Health Hazard Evaluations of occupational cancer cluster concerns: the USA, January 2001-December 2020.","authors":"Dallas S Shi, Jessica L Rinsky, George R Grimes, Sophia K Chiu","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-108988","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-108988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe recent investigations of potential workplace cancer clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) of cancer concerns during 2001-2020. We described information about industry, requestors, cancer characteristics, investigative procedures, and determinations about the presence of a cluster (ie, presence of excess cases, unusual case distribution or exposure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5754 HHEs, 174 included cancer concerns, comprising 1%-5% of HHEs per year. In 123 HHEs, the cancer cluster concerns involved different cancer primary sites. Investigation procedures varied but included record review (n=63, 36%) and site visits (n=22, 13%). Of 158 HHEs with a cluster determination by investigator(s), 151 (96%) were not considered cancer clusters. In seven HHEs, investigators found evidence of a cluster, but occupational exposure to a carcinogen was not identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of HHEs on workplace cancer cluster concerns remained steady over time; most did not meet the definition of a cluster or uncover an occupational cause. Public health practitioners can use this information to provide updated context when addressing workplace cancer cluster concerns and as motivation to refine investigative approaches. More broadly, this review highlights an opportunity to identify best practices on how to apply community cluster investigation methods to the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10897873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71484513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-02DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109032
Christopher E Overton, Rachel Abbey, Tarrion Baird, Rachel Christie, Owen Daniel, Julie Day, Matthew Gittins, Owen Jones, Robert Paton, Maria Tang, Tom Ward, Jack Wilkinson, Camilla Woodrow-Hill, Timothy Aldridge, Yiqun Chen
Objectives: To identify risk factors that contribute to outbreaks of COVID-19 in the workplace and quantify their effect on outbreak risk.
Methods: We identified outbreaks of COVID-19 cases in the workplace and investigated the characteristics of the individuals, the workplaces, the areas they work and the mode of commute to work, through data linkages based on Middle Layer Super Output Areas in England between 20 June 2021 and 20 February 2022. We estimated population-level associations between potential risk factors and workplace outbreaks, adjusting for plausible confounders identified using a directed acyclic graph.
Results: For most industries, increased physical proximity in the workplace was associated with increased risk of COVID-19 outbreaks, while increased vaccination was associated with reduced risk. Employee demographic risk factors varied across industry, but for the majority of industries, a higher proportion of black/African/Caribbean ethnicities and living in deprived areas, was associated with increased outbreak risk. A higher proportion of employees in the 60-64 age group was associated with reduced outbreak risk. There were significant associations between gender, work commute modes and staff contract type with outbreak risk, but these were highly variable across industries.
Conclusions: This study has used novel national data linkages to identify potential risk factors of workplace COVID-19 outbreaks, including possible protective effects of vaccination and increased physical distance at work. The same methodological approach can be applied to wider occupational and environmental health research.
{"title":"Identifying employee, workplace and population characteristics associated with COVID-19 outbreaks in the workplace: a population-based study.","authors":"Christopher E Overton, Rachel Abbey, Tarrion Baird, Rachel Christie, Owen Daniel, Julie Day, Matthew Gittins, Owen Jones, Robert Paton, Maria Tang, Tom Ward, Jack Wilkinson, Camilla Woodrow-Hill, Timothy Aldridge, Yiqun Chen","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109032","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify risk factors that contribute to outbreaks of COVID-19 in the workplace and quantify their effect on outbreak risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified outbreaks of COVID-19 cases in the workplace and investigated the characteristics of the individuals, the workplaces, the areas they work and the mode of commute to work, through data linkages based on Middle Layer Super Output Areas in England between 20 June 2021 and 20 February 2022. We estimated population-level associations between potential risk factors and workplace outbreaks, adjusting for plausible confounders identified using a directed acyclic graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For most industries, increased physical proximity in the workplace was associated with increased risk of COVID-19 outbreaks, while increased vaccination was associated with reduced risk. Employee demographic risk factors varied across industry, but for the majority of industries, a higher proportion of black/African/Caribbean ethnicities and living in deprived areas, was associated with increased outbreak risk. A higher proportion of employees in the 60-64 age group was associated with reduced outbreak risk. There were significant associations between gender, work commute modes and staff contract type with outbreak risk, but these were highly variable across industries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has used novel national data linkages to identify potential risk factors of workplace COVID-19 outbreaks, including possible protective effects of vaccination and increased physical distance at work. The same methodological approach can be applied to wider occupational and environmental health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139403858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109218
Aamna Warsi, Mark Richard Pucci, Sally Marie Bradberry, Aleha Khan, Muhammad Elamin Muhammad Osman Elamin
Introduction Lead exposure from discharged lead dust is a recognised risk at firing ranges. We report a lead poisoning outbreak among staff and their close contacts at a UK civilian indoor 24 m firing range. Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of data collected on all patients at risk of lead poisoning identified either by direct referral to the Clinical Toxicology clinicians at the West Midlands Poisons Unit, or via the Trace Elements Supra-Regional Assay Service Laboratory at Sandwell hospital. Results Eighty-seven patients were identified as having possible lead exposure, either at the firing range or via close contacts. Of these, 63 patients aged between 6 months and 78 years attended for blood lead concentration (BLC) testing. The highest BLC at presentation was 11.7 µmol/L (242 µg/dL). Only nine patients reported any symptoms at presentation. Fifteen patients received lead chelation therapy with oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (or succimer) 30 mg/kg/day or intravenous sodium calcium edetate (EDTA) 75 mg/kg/day, dependent on stock availability. Discussion This report highlights the need for vigilance of lead poisoning as an occupational hazard in the UK, including at recreational facilities such as indoor firing ranges. It emphasises the importance of regulation of lead exposure in the workplace, particularly given the vague symptoms of lead poisoning, and proposes re-appraisal of UK legislation. This report also highlights potential issues surrounding stock availability of rarely used antidotes for uncommon presentations in the event of an outbreak of poisoning. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
{"title":"Outbreak of lead poisoning from a civilian indoor firing range in the UK","authors":"Aamna Warsi, Mark Richard Pucci, Sally Marie Bradberry, Aleha Khan, Muhammad Elamin Muhammad Osman Elamin","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109218","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Lead exposure from discharged lead dust is a recognised risk at firing ranges. We report a lead poisoning outbreak among staff and their close contacts at a UK civilian indoor 24 m firing range. Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of data collected on all patients at risk of lead poisoning identified either by direct referral to the Clinical Toxicology clinicians at the West Midlands Poisons Unit, or via the Trace Elements Supra-Regional Assay Service Laboratory at Sandwell hospital. Results Eighty-seven patients were identified as having possible lead exposure, either at the firing range or via close contacts. Of these, 63 patients aged between 6 months and 78 years attended for blood lead concentration (BLC) testing. The highest BLC at presentation was 11.7 µmol/L (242 µg/dL). Only nine patients reported any symptoms at presentation. Fifteen patients received lead chelation therapy with oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (or succimer) 30 mg/kg/day or intravenous sodium calcium edetate (EDTA) 75 mg/kg/day, dependent on stock availability. Discussion This report highlights the need for vigilance of lead poisoning as an occupational hazard in the UK, including at recreational facilities such as indoor firing ranges. It emphasises the importance of regulation of lead exposure in the workplace, particularly given the vague symptoms of lead poisoning, and proposes re-appraisal of UK legislation. This report also highlights potential issues surrounding stock availability of rarely used antidotes for uncommon presentations in the event of an outbreak of poisoning. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139667065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-06DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109099
Candice Y Johnson, Barbara Grajewski, Christina C Lawson, Leslie A MacDonald, Carissa M Rocheleau, Elizabeth A Whelan
Objectives: Flight attendants perform physically demanding work such as lifting baggage, pushing service carts and spending the workday on their feet. We examined if more frequent exposure to occupational physical demands could explain why previous studies have found that flight attendants have a higher reported prevalence of menstrual cycle irregularities than other workers.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 694 flight attendants and 120 teachers aged 18-44 years from three US cities. Eligible participants were married, had not had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation, were not using hormonal contraception and were not recently pregnant. Participants reported menstrual cycle characteristics (cramps, pain, irregular cycles, flow, bleed length, cycle length) and occupational physical demands (standing, lifting, pushing/pulling, bending/twisting, overall effort). We used modified Poisson regression to examine associations between occupation (flight attendant, teacher) and menstrual irregularities; among flight attendants, we further examined associations between occupational physical demands and menstrual irregularities.
Results: All occupational physical demands were more commonly reported by flight attendants than teachers. Flight attendants reported more frequent menstrual cramps than teachers, and most occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent or painful menstrual cramps. Lifting heavy loads was also associated with irregular cycles.
Conclusions: Occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent and worse menstrual pain among flight attendants. The physical demands experienced by these workers may contribute to the high burden of menstrual irregularities reported by flight attendants compared with other occupational groups, such as teachers.
{"title":"Occupational physical demands and menstrual cycle irregularities in flight attendants and teachers.","authors":"Candice Y Johnson, Barbara Grajewski, Christina C Lawson, Leslie A MacDonald, Carissa M Rocheleau, Elizabeth A Whelan","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109099","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Flight attendants perform physically demanding work such as lifting baggage, pushing service carts and spending the workday on their feet. We examined if more frequent exposure to occupational physical demands could explain why previous studies have found that flight attendants have a higher reported prevalence of menstrual cycle irregularities than other workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 694 flight attendants and 120 teachers aged 18-44 years from three US cities. Eligible participants were married, had not had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation, were not using hormonal contraception and were not recently pregnant. Participants reported menstrual cycle characteristics (cramps, pain, irregular cycles, flow, bleed length, cycle length) and occupational physical demands (standing, lifting, pushing/pulling, bending/twisting, overall effort). We used modified Poisson regression to examine associations between occupation (flight attendant, teacher) and menstrual irregularities; among flight attendants, we further examined associations between occupational physical demands and menstrual irregularities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All occupational physical demands were more commonly reported by flight attendants than teachers. Flight attendants reported more frequent menstrual cramps than teachers, and most occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent or painful menstrual cramps. Lifting heavy loads was also associated with irregular cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent and worse menstrual pain among flight attendants. The physical demands experienced by these workers may contribute to the high burden of menstrual irregularities reported by flight attendants compared with other occupational groups, such as teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226562/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139111131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-30DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108908
Jessica Gerlich, Johan Ohlander, Hans Kromhout, Roel Vermeulen, Sandra Söhler, Katja Radon, Dennis Nowak, Stefan Karrasch, Nina Adaskina, Claus Vogelmeier, Uta Ochmann, Rudolf A Jörres
Objectives The impact of occupational exposures on lung function impairments and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was analysed and compared with that of smoking. Methods Data from 1283 men and 759 women (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1–4 or former grade 0, without alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency) of the COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network cohort were analysed. Cumulative exposure to gases/fumes, biological dust, mineral dust or the combination vapours/gases/dusts/fumes was assessed using the ALOHA job exposure matrix. The effect of both occupational and smoking exposure on lung function and disease-specific QoL (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) was analysed using linear regression analysis adjusting for age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension and coronary artery disease, stratified by sex. Results In men, exposure to gases/fumes showed the strongest effects among occupational exposures, being significantly associated with all lung function parameters and QoL; the effects were partially stronger than of smoking. Smoking had a larger effect than occupational exposure on lung diffusing capacity (transfer factor for carbon monoxide) but not on air trapping (residual volume/total lung capacity). In women, occupational exposures were not significantly associated with QoL or lung function, while the relationships between lung function parameters and smoking were comparable to men. Conclusions In patients with COPD, cumulative occupational exposure, particularly to gases/fumes, showed effects on airway obstruction, air trapping, gas uptake capacity and disease-related QoL, some of which were larger than those of smoking. These findings suggest that lung air trapping and QoL should be considered as outcomes of occupational exposure to gases and fumes in patients with COPD. Trial registration number [NCT01245933][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Approval by all relevant human research ethics committees will be required. [1]: /external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTNNCT01245933
目的 分析职业暴露对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者肺功能损伤和生活质量(QoL)的影响,并与吸烟的影响进行比较。方法 对慢性阻塞性肺病和系统性后果合并症网络队列中的 1283 名男性和 759 名女性(慢性阻塞性肺病全球倡议(GOLD)1-4 级或以前的 0 级,无α-1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症)的数据进行了分析。气体/烟雾、生物粉尘、矿物粉尘或蒸汽/气体/粉尘/烟雾组合的累积暴露使用 ALOHA 工作暴露矩阵进行评估。采用线性回归分析方法分析了职业暴露和吸烟暴露对肺功能和疾病特异性 QoL(圣乔治呼吸系统问卷)的影响,并按性别对年龄、体重指数、糖尿病、高血压和冠状动脉疾病进行了调整。结果 在男性职业暴露中,接触气体/烟雾的影响最大,与所有肺功能参数和 QoL 都有显著相关;部分影响强于吸烟。与职业暴露相比,吸烟对肺扩散能力(一氧化碳转移因子)的影响更大,但对空气截留(残留容积/总肺活量)的影响不大。在女性中,职业暴露与 QoL 或肺功能无显著相关性,而肺功能参数与吸烟之间的关系与男性相当。结论 在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,累积的职业暴露,尤其是气体/烟雾暴露,会对气道阻塞、空气截留、气体摄取能力和疾病相关的 QoL 产生影响,其中一些影响大于吸烟的影响。这些研究结果表明,慢性阻塞性肺病患者在职业暴露于气体和烟雾时应考虑肺部空气截留和 QoL。试验注册号[NCT01245933][1]。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。需要获得所有相关人类研究伦理委员会的批准。[1]:/external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTNNCT01245933
{"title":"Cumulative occupational exposure to gases and fumes is associated with impairment in lung function and disease-related quality of life in a German COPD patient cohort","authors":"Jessica Gerlich, Johan Ohlander, Hans Kromhout, Roel Vermeulen, Sandra Söhler, Katja Radon, Dennis Nowak, Stefan Karrasch, Nina Adaskina, Claus Vogelmeier, Uta Ochmann, Rudolf A Jörres","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-108908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-108908","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The impact of occupational exposures on lung function impairments and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was analysed and compared with that of smoking. Methods Data from 1283 men and 759 women (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1–4 or former grade 0, without alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency) of the COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network cohort were analysed. Cumulative exposure to gases/fumes, biological dust, mineral dust or the combination vapours/gases/dusts/fumes was assessed using the ALOHA job exposure matrix. The effect of both occupational and smoking exposure on lung function and disease-specific QoL (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) was analysed using linear regression analysis adjusting for age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension and coronary artery disease, stratified by sex. Results In men, exposure to gases/fumes showed the strongest effects among occupational exposures, being significantly associated with all lung function parameters and QoL; the effects were partially stronger than of smoking. Smoking had a larger effect than occupational exposure on lung diffusing capacity (transfer factor for carbon monoxide) but not on air trapping (residual volume/total lung capacity). In women, occupational exposures were not significantly associated with QoL or lung function, while the relationships between lung function parameters and smoking were comparable to men. Conclusions In patients with COPD, cumulative occupational exposure, particularly to gases/fumes, showed effects on airway obstruction, air trapping, gas uptake capacity and disease-related QoL, some of which were larger than those of smoking. These findings suggest that lung air trapping and QoL should be considered as outcomes of occupational exposure to gases and fumes in patients with COPD. Trial registration number [NCT01245933][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Approval by all relevant human research ethics committees will be required. [1]: /external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTNNCT01245933","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139069162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-28DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109139
Ronnie Babigumira, Marit B Veierød, H Dean Hosgood, Sven Ove Samuelsen, Magne Bråtveit, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Nathaniel Rothman, Qing Lan, Debra T Silverman, Melissa C Friesen, Nita Kaupang Shala, Tom K Grimsrud, Jo Steinson Stenehjem
Objective: The objective of our study was to examine whether occupational exposure to benzene is associated with lung cancer among males in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Workers cohort.
Methods: Among 25 347 male offshore workers employed during 1965-1998, we conducted a case-cohort study with 399 lung cancer cases diagnosed between 1999 and 2021, and 2035 non-cases sampled randomly by 5-year birth cohorts. Individual work histories were coupled to study-specific job-exposure matrices for benzene and other known lung carcinogens. Weighted Cox regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the associations between benzene exposure and lung cancer, by major histological subtypes, adjusted for age, smoking and occupational exposure to welding fumes, asbestos and crystalline silica. Missing data were imputed.
Results: For lung cancer (all subtypes combined), HRs (95% CIs) for the highest quartiles of benzene exposure versus unexposed were 1.15 (0.61 to 2.35) for cumulative exposure, 1.43 (0.76 to 2.69) for duration, and 1.22 (0.68 to 2.18) for average intensity (0.280≤P-trend≤0.741). For 152 adenocarcinoma cases, a positive trend was observed for exposure duration (P-trend=0.044).
Conclusions: In this cohort of offshore petroleum workers generally exposed to low average levels of benzene, we did not find an overall clear support for an association with lung cancer (all subtypes combined), although an association was suggested for duration of benzene exposure and adenocarcinoma. The limited evidence might be due to restricted statistical power.
{"title":"Benzene exposure and risk of lung cancer in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Worker cohort: a prospective case-cohort study.","authors":"Ronnie Babigumira, Marit B Veierød, H Dean Hosgood, Sven Ove Samuelsen, Magne Bråtveit, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Nathaniel Rothman, Qing Lan, Debra T Silverman, Melissa C Friesen, Nita Kaupang Shala, Tom K Grimsrud, Jo Steinson Stenehjem","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study was to examine whether occupational exposure to benzene is associated with lung cancer among males in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Workers cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 25 347 male offshore workers employed during 1965-1998, we conducted a case-cohort study with 399 lung cancer cases diagnosed between 1999 and 2021, and 2035 non-cases sampled randomly by 5-year birth cohorts. Individual work histories were coupled to study-specific job-exposure matrices for benzene and other known lung carcinogens. Weighted Cox regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the associations between benzene exposure and lung cancer, by major histological subtypes, adjusted for age, smoking and occupational exposure to welding fumes, asbestos and crystalline silica. Missing data were imputed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For lung cancer (all subtypes combined), HRs (95% CIs) for the highest quartiles of benzene exposure versus unexposed were 1.15 (0.61 to 2.35) for cumulative exposure, 1.43 (0.76 to 2.69) for duration, and 1.22 (0.68 to 2.18) for average intensity (0.280≤P-trend≤0.741). For 152 adenocarcinoma cases, a positive trend was observed for exposure duration (P-trend=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of offshore petroleum workers generally exposed to low average levels of benzene, we did not find an overall clear support for an association with lung cancer (all subtypes combined), although an association was suggested for duration of benzene exposure and adenocarcinoma. The limited evidence might be due to restricted statistical power.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139058567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}