Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109606
Leslie I Boden, Abay Asfaw, Paul K O'Leary, Yorghos Tripodis, Andrew Busey, Katie M Applebaum, Matthew P Fox
Objectives: To estimate the impact of occupational injury and illness on opioid-related mortality while accounting for confounding by preinjury opioid use.
Methods: We employed a retrospective cohort study design using Washington State workers' compensation data for 1994-2000 injuries linked to US Social Security Administration earnings and mortality data and National Death Index (NDI) cause of death data from 1994 to 2018. We categorised injuries as lost-time versus medical-only, where the former involved more than 3 days off work or permanent disability. We determined death status and cause of death from NDI records. We modelled separate Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% CIs for injured men and women for opioid-related and all drug-related mortality through 2018. We used quantitative bias analysis to account for unmeasured confounding by preinjury opioid use.
Results: The hazard of opioid-related mortality was elevated for workers with lost-time relative to medical-only injuries: sHR for men: 1.53, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.66; for women: 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48. Accounting for preinjury opioid use, effect sizes were reduced but remained elevated: sHR for men was 1.43, 95% simulation interval (SI) 1.20 to 1.69; for women: 1.27, 95% SI 1.10 to 1.45.
Conclusions: Occupational injuries and illnesses severe enough to require more than 3 days off work are associated with an increase in the hazard of opioid-related mortality. The estimated increase is reduced when we account for preinjury opioid use, but it remains substantial. Reducing work-related injuries and postinjury opioid prescribing and improving employment and income security may decrease opioid-related mortality.
目的估计职业伤病对阿片类药物相关死亡率的影响,同时考虑受伤前使用阿片类药物的混杂因素:我们采用了一种回顾性队列研究设计,利用华盛顿州 1994-2000 年工伤赔偿数据与美国社会保障局收入和死亡率数据以及 1994-2018 年国家死亡指数(NDI)死因数据进行关联。我们将工伤分为损失工时工伤和纯医疗工伤,前者涉及超过 3 天的停工或永久性残疾。我们根据 NDI 记录确定死亡状态和死因。我们为受伤男性和女性建立了单独的 Fine 和 Gray 亚分布危险比 (sHR) 模型和 95% CIs 模型,用于计算截至 2018 年的阿片类药物相关死亡率和所有药物相关死亡率。我们使用定量偏差分析来考虑受伤前使用阿片类药物的未测量混杂因素:与单纯医疗伤害相比,工伤工人与阿片类药物相关的死亡风险更高:男性的 sHR 为 1.53,95% CI 为 1.41 至 1.66;女性的 sHR 为 1.31,95% CI 为 1.16 至 1.48。考虑到受伤前阿片类药物的使用,效应大小有所降低,但仍然较高:男性的sHR为1.43,95%模拟区间(SI)为1.20至1.69;女性为1.27,95%模拟区间(SI)为1.10至1.45:严重到需要请假 3 天以上的职业伤病与阿片类药物相关死亡率的增加有关。如果考虑到受伤前使用阿片类药物的情况,估计增加的死亡率会有所降低,但仍然很高。减少工伤和伤后阿片类药物处方,改善就业和收入保障,可降低与阿片类药物相关的死亡率。
{"title":"Opioid-related mortality after occupational injury in Washington State: accounting for preinjury opioid use.","authors":"Leslie I Boden, Abay Asfaw, Paul K O'Leary, Yorghos Tripodis, Andrew Busey, Katie M Applebaum, Matthew P Fox","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109606","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the impact of occupational injury and illness on opioid-related mortality while accounting for confounding by preinjury opioid use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a retrospective cohort study design using Washington State workers' compensation data for 1994-2000 injuries linked to US Social Security Administration earnings and mortality data and National Death Index (NDI) cause of death data from 1994 to 2018. We categorised injuries as lost-time versus medical-only, where the former involved more than 3 days off work or permanent disability. We determined death status and cause of death from NDI records. We modelled separate Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% CIs for injured men and women for opioid-related and all drug-related mortality through 2018. We used quantitative bias analysis to account for unmeasured confounding by preinjury opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hazard of opioid-related mortality was elevated for workers with lost-time relative to medical-only injuries: sHR for men: 1.53, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.66; for women: 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48. Accounting for preinjury opioid use, effect sizes were reduced but remained elevated: sHR for men was 1.43, 95% simulation interval (SI) 1.20 to 1.69; for women: 1.27, 95% SI 1.10 to 1.45.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occupational injuries and illnesses severe enough to require more than 3 days off work are associated with an increase in the hazard of opioid-related mortality. The estimated increase is reduced when we account for preinjury opioid use, but it remains substantial. Reducing work-related injuries and postinjury opioid prescribing and improving employment and income security may decrease opioid-related mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"515-521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109656
Erika L Sabbath, Samantha M McKetchnie, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder
Objectives: Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels of work-related stress that the laws have created for them. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impacts of post-Dobbs v. Jackson state abortion bans on occupational health and well-being of OB-GYNs.
Methods: The Study of OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America is a qualitative study of 54 OB-GYNs practising in 13 of the 14 states with near-total abortion bans as of March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited for semistructured qualitative interviews via videoconference from March to August 2023.
Results: Thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six major domains of health and well-being impacts of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs: anxiety and depression, burden of negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related health behaviours, sleep disruption and personal relationships.
Conclusions: State abortion bans following the 2022 Dobbs decision may impact the health and well-being not only of pregnant patients but also of their providers. These provider health impacts include mental health and burn-out but also extend to physical health outcomes and the work-life interface.
{"title":"Are state abortion bans an occupational health hazard for obstetrician-gynaecologists? Findings from a multistate qualitative study.","authors":"Erika L Sabbath, Samantha M McKetchnie, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109656","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels of work-related stress that the laws have created for them. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impacts of post-Dobbs v. Jackson state abortion bans on occupational health and well-being of OB-GYNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Study of OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America is a qualitative study of 54 OB-GYNs practising in 13 of the 14 states with near-total abortion bans as of March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited for semistructured qualitative interviews via videoconference from March to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six major domains of health and well-being impacts of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs: anxiety and depression, burden of negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related health behaviours, sleep disruption and personal relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State abortion bans following the 2022 Dobbs decision may impact the health and well-being not only of pregnant patients but also of their providers. These provider health impacts include mental health and burn-out but also extend to physical health outcomes and the work-life interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"493-497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109621
Brendan Dempsey, Helen A Blake, Ira Madan, Sharon A M Stevelink, Neil Greenberg, Rosalind Raine, Anne-Marie Rafferty, Rupa Bhundia, Simon Wessely, Danielle Lamb
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine post COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in England and explore risk factors for the condition.
Methods: Data were collected by National Health Service (NHS) CHECK, a longitudinal study exploring HCWs' mental and physical well-being during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. NHS CHECK collected data at four timepoints: the baseline survey between April 2020 and January 2021, and then three follow-up surveys at approximately 6, 12 and 32 months post baseline. PCS data were collected at 12 and 32 months, while risk factor data were from baseline. HCWs were asked what COVID-19 symptoms they experienced and for how long and were classified as having PCS if they had any symptom for ≥12 weeks. Multilevel regressions were used to examine risk factors for PCS.
Results: This study included 5248 HCWs. While 33.6% (n=1730) reported prolonged COVID-19 symptoms consistent with PCS, only 7.4% (n=385) reported a formal diagnosis of PCS. Fatigue, difficult concentrating, insomnia and anxiety or depression were the most common PCS symptoms. Baseline risk factors for reporting PCS included screening for common mental disorders, direct contact with COVID-19 patients, pre-existing respiratory illnesses, female sex and older age.
Conclusions: While a third of HCWs reported prolonged COVID-19 symptoms consistent with PCS, a smaller percentage reported a formal diagnosis of the condition. We replicate findings that direct contact with COVID-19 patients, older age, female sex, pre-existing respiratory illness and symptoms of common mental disorders are associated with increased risk of PCS.
{"title":"Post COVID-19 syndrome among 5248 healthcare workers in England: longitudinal findings from NHS CHECK.","authors":"Brendan Dempsey, Helen A Blake, Ira Madan, Sharon A M Stevelink, Neil Greenberg, Rosalind Raine, Anne-Marie Rafferty, Rupa Bhundia, Simon Wessely, Danielle Lamb","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109621","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to examine post COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in England and explore risk factors for the condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected by National Health Service (NHS) CHECK, a longitudinal study exploring HCWs' mental and physical well-being during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. NHS CHECK collected data at four timepoints: the baseline survey between April 2020 and January 2021, and then three follow-up surveys at approximately 6, 12 and 32 months post baseline. PCS data were collected at 12 and 32 months, while risk factor data were from baseline. HCWs were asked what COVID-19 symptoms they experienced and for how long and were classified as having PCS if they had any symptom for ≥12 weeks. Multilevel regressions were used to examine risk factors for PCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 5248 HCWs. While 33.6% (n=1730) reported prolonged COVID-19 symptoms consistent with PCS, only 7.4% (n=385) reported a formal diagnosis of PCS. Fatigue, difficult concentrating, insomnia and anxiety or depression were the most common PCS symptoms. Baseline risk factors for reporting PCS included screening for common mental disorders, direct contact with COVID-19 patients, pre-existing respiratory illnesses, female sex and older age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While a third of HCWs reported prolonged COVID-19 symptoms consistent with PCS, a smaller percentage reported a formal diagnosis of the condition. We replicate findings that direct contact with COVID-19 patients, older age, female sex, pre-existing respiratory illness and symptoms of common mental disorders are associated with increased risk of PCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"471-479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109563
Sasha Javanmardi, Ludwig Rappelt, Lars Heinke, Daniel Niederer, Janis Alexander Zemke, Jürgen Freiwald, Christian Baumgart
Objectives: This study investigates the impact of different work paces on cardiorespiratory outcomes, perceived effort and carried load (CL) in industrial workers.
Methods: A randomised cross-over trial was conducted at a mid-sized steel company. We included 12 healthy industrial workers (8 females, age: mean 44±SD 9 years, height: 1.70±0.08 m, body mass: 79.5±13.4 kg) with at least 6 months of working experience. All participants performed 5 min of piece work at 100% (P100), 115% (P115) and 130% (P130) of the company's internal target yielded in a randomised order, separated by 5 min familiarisation breaks. The primary outcome was energy expenditure (EE), calculated from a respiratory gas exchange using a metabolic analyser. Secondary outcomes were total ventilation, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide release, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate and rating of perceived effort (0-10). Furthermore, the metabolic equivalent and the CL were calculated. Data were analysed with repeated measure analyses of variance.
Results: For EE, a large 'pace' effect with a small difference between P100 and P130 (165.9±33.4 vs 178.8±40.1 kcal/hour-1, p=0.008, standard mean difference, SMD=0.35) was revealed. Additionally, a large difference in CL between all paces (p<0.001, SMD≥1.10) was revealed. No adverse events occurred.
Conclusions: Cardiorespiratory outcomes rise with increased work pace, but the practical relevance of these differences still needs to be specified. However, the CL will add up over time and may impact musculoskeletal health in the long term.
{"title":"Impact of work pace on cardiorespiratory outcomes, perceived effort and carried load in industrial workers: a randomised cross-over trial.","authors":"Sasha Javanmardi, Ludwig Rappelt, Lars Heinke, Daniel Niederer, Janis Alexander Zemke, Jürgen Freiwald, Christian Baumgart","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109563","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the impact of different work paces on cardiorespiratory outcomes, perceived effort and carried load (CL) in industrial workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised cross-over trial was conducted at a mid-sized steel company. We included 12 healthy industrial workers (8 females, age: mean 44±SD 9 years, height: 1.70±0.08 m, body mass: 79.5±13.4 kg) with at least 6 months of working experience. All participants performed 5 min of piece work at 100% (P100), 115% (P115) and 130% (P130) of the company's internal target yielded in a randomised order, separated by 5 min familiarisation breaks. The primary outcome was energy expenditure (EE), calculated from a respiratory gas exchange using a metabolic analyser. Secondary outcomes were total ventilation, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide release, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate and rating of perceived effort (0-10). Furthermore, the metabolic equivalent and the CL were calculated. Data were analysed with repeated measure analyses of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For EE, a large 'pace' effect with a small difference between P100 and P130 (165.9±33.4 vs 178.8±40.1 kcal/hour<sup>-1</sup>, p=0.008, standard mean difference, SMD=0.35) was revealed. Additionally, a large difference in CL between all paces (p<0.001, SMD≥1.10) was revealed. No adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiorespiratory outcomes rise with increased work pace, but the practical relevance of these differences still needs to be specified. However, the CL will add up over time and may impact musculoskeletal health in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"456-461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109192
Cato M Milder, Michael B Bellamy, Sara C Howard, Elizabeth D Ellis, Ashley P Golden, Sarah S Cohen, Michael T Mumma, Benjamin French, Lydia B Zablotska, John D Boice
Objective: This follow-up study of uranium processing workers at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center examines the relationship between radiation exposure and cancer and non-cancer mortality among 6403 workers employed for at least 30 days between 1951 and 1985.
Methods: We estimated cumulative, individual, annualised doses to 15 organs/tissues from external, internal and radon exposures. Vital status and cause of death were ascertained in 2017. The analysis employed standardised mortality ratios, Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models. Competing risk analysis was conducted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk given several assumptions about risk independent of competing outcomes. Emphysema was examined to assess the potential for confounding by smoking.
Results: Vital status was confirmed for 98.1% of workers, with 65.1% deceased. All-cause mortality was less than expected in salaried but not hourly workers when compared with the US population. A statistically significant dose response was observed between external (but not total or internal) lung dose and lung cancer mortality (HR at 100 mGy adjusted for internal dose=1.45; 95% CI=1.05 to 2.01). Significantly increased HRs at 100 mGy dose to heart were observed for CVD (1.27; 95% CI=1.07 to 1.50) and ischaemic heart disease (1.30; 95% CI=1.07 to 1.58). CVD risk remained elevated regardless of competing risk assumptions. Both external and internal radiation were associated with emphysema.
Conclusions: Lung cancer was associated with external dose, though positive dose responses for emphysema imply residual confounding by smoking. Novel use of competing risk analysis for CVD demonstrates leveraging retrospective data for future risk prediction.
{"title":"Mortality follow-up of Fernald Feed Materials Production Center workers exposed to uranium from 1951 to 1985.","authors":"Cato M Milder, Michael B Bellamy, Sara C Howard, Elizabeth D Ellis, Ashley P Golden, Sarah S Cohen, Michael T Mumma, Benjamin French, Lydia B Zablotska, John D Boice","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109192","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study of uranium processing workers at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center examines the relationship between radiation exposure and cancer and non-cancer mortality among 6403 workers employed for at least 30 days between 1951 and 1985.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated cumulative, individual, annualised doses to 15 organs/tissues from external, internal and radon exposures. Vital status and cause of death were ascertained in 2017. The analysis employed standardised mortality ratios, Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models. Competing risk analysis was conducted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk given several assumptions about risk independent of competing outcomes. Emphysema was examined to assess the potential for confounding by smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vital status was confirmed for 98.1% of workers, with 65.1% deceased. All-cause mortality was less than expected in salaried but not hourly workers when compared with the US population. A statistically significant dose response was observed between external (but not total or internal) lung dose and lung cancer mortality (HR at 100 mGy adjusted for internal dose=1.45; 95% CI=1.05 to 2.01). Significantly increased HRs at 100 mGy dose to heart were observed for CVD (1.27; 95% CI=1.07 to 1.50) and ischaemic heart disease (1.30; 95% CI=1.07 to 1.58). CVD risk remained elevated regardless of competing risk assumptions. Both external and internal radiation were associated with emphysema.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung cancer was associated with external dose, though positive dose responses for emphysema imply residual confounding by smoking. Novel use of competing risk analysis for CVD demonstrates leveraging retrospective data for future risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"439-447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141988481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109210corr1
{"title":"Correction: <i>who tests for lead and why? A 10-year analysis of blood lead screening, follow-up and CNS outcomes in a statewide US healthcare system</i>.","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109210corr1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109210corr1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"81 9","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142392204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109536
Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Ryoko Susukida, Himani Byregowda, Zhiqing E Zhou, Clifford S Mitchell, Renee M Johnson
Introduction: We aimed to describe the occupational pattern of opioid overdose deaths in Maryland between 2018 and 2022 and determine the occupations at higher risk of opioid overdose death.
Methods: The sample included undetermined or unintentional opioid overdose deaths among those aged 16 years or older in Maryland, drawn from the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. We calculated population-based incidence overdose rates by occupation, stratified by sex and race. We further calculated the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing each occupation with all other groups combined and estimated the IRRs among males versus females and non-Hispanic whites versus other racial/ethnic groups.
Results: The pooled sample included 11 455 opioid overdose decedents (72% male and 55% non-Hispanic whites) of whom 80% were employed. The three occupation groups with the highest incidence rates were 'construction and extraction', 'transportation and material moving' and 'installation/maintenance and repair' with 291, 137 and 133 deaths per 100 000 workers in these respective occupational groups. Incidence rates were significantly higher in males than females in all categories except those 'Not in Labour Force' (IRR=0.51, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic whites relative to other racial/ethnic groups had a lower incidence of opioid overdose death in 'Military-Specific' occupations (IRR=0.53, p=0.031).
Conclusion: Opioid overdose deaths vary by type of occupation and certain occupations are at higher risk of overdose death. The findings highlight the need for priority setting in the implementation and expansion of existing strategies to target the workers most impacted by opioid overdose.
{"title":"Maryland opioid overdose deaths from 2018 to 2022: occupational patterns and their sociodemographic variations.","authors":"Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Ryoko Susukida, Himani Byregowda, Zhiqing E Zhou, Clifford S Mitchell, Renee M Johnson","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109536","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to describe the occupational pattern of opioid overdose deaths in Maryland between 2018 and 2022 and determine the occupations at higher risk of opioid overdose death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included undetermined or unintentional opioid overdose deaths among those aged 16 years or older in Maryland, drawn from the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. We calculated population-based incidence overdose rates by occupation, stratified by sex and race. We further calculated the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing each occupation with all other groups combined and estimated the IRRs among males versus females and non-Hispanic whites versus other racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sample included 11 455 opioid overdose decedents (72% male and 55% non-Hispanic whites) of whom 80% were employed. The three occupation groups with the highest incidence rates were 'construction and extraction', 'transportation and material moving' and 'installation/maintenance and repair' with 291, 137 and 133 deaths per 100 000 workers in these respective occupational groups. Incidence rates were significantly higher in males than females in all categories except those 'Not in Labour Force' (IRR=0.51, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic whites relative to other racial/ethnic groups had a lower incidence of opioid overdose death in 'Military-Specific' occupations (IRR=0.53, p=0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opioid overdose deaths vary by type of occupation and certain occupations are at higher risk of overdose death. The findings highlight the need for priority setting in the implementation and expansion of existing strategies to target the workers most impacted by opioid overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"462-470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109525
Gemma Archer, Thomas Keegan, Simon Wessely, Katherine M Venables, Nicola T Fear
Objectives: We investigated whether UK military personnel exposed to sarin during the 'Service Volunteer Programme' at Porton Down had increased rates of mortality or cancer incidence over a 52-year follow-up.
Methods: A historical cohort study assembled from UK military records, comprising male veterans exposed to sarin during the 'Service Volunteer Programme' at Porton Down, UK (n=2975) and a comparison group of similar veterans who did not attend (n=2919). Mortality and cancer incidence data were obtained from national registries up to December 2019. Analysis was conducted using Cox regression adjusted for age, year of birth and service characteristics.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 52.2 years (range 2 days to 74.6 years), 1598 (53.7%) sarin-exposed veterans and 1583 (54.3%) non-exposed veterans died. Adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were raised for any sarin exposure (HR=1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16), two or more exposures (HR=1.25, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49) and higher doses (air >15 mg.min/m3) (HR=1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30). For cause-specific mortality, sarin exposure was associated with deaths from 'other' circulatory diseases (excludes ischaemic and cerebrovascular diseases) (HR=1.41, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.87) and alcohol-attributable deaths (HR=2.66, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.07). There was no association between sarin exposure and overall cancer incidence (HR=1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10), but cancer incidence was higher for alcohol-related neoplasms (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.51).
Conclusions: Sarin exposure was associated with increased rates of mortality over a 50-year follow-up. The strongest associations were observed for deaths attributable to alcohol and 'other' circulatory diseases.
目的:我们调查了在波顿唐 "志愿服务计划 "期间接触沙林的英国军人在 52 年的随访中是否会增加死亡率或癌症发病率:我们调查了在波顿唐 "志愿服务计划 "期间接触沙林的英国军人在52年的随访中死亡率或癌症发病率是否升高:从英国军方记录中收集的历史队列研究,包括在英国波顿唐 "志愿服务计划 "期间接触沙林的男性退伍军人(n=2975)和未参加该计划的类似退伍军人对比组(n=2919)。截至 2019 年 12 月的死亡率和癌症发病率数据来自国家登记处。分析采用考克斯回归法,并对年龄、出生年份和服役特征进行了调整:在中位 52.2 年(2 天至 74.6 年)的随访期间,1598 名(53.7%)接触过沙林的退伍军人和 1583 名(54.3%)未接触过沙林的退伍军人死亡。任何沙林暴露(HR=1.08,95% CI 1.01 至 1.16)、两次或两次以上暴露(HR=1.25,95% CI 1.04 至 1.49)和较高剂量(空气 >15 mg.min/m3)(HR=1.15,95% CI 1.02 至 1.30)的调整后全因死亡率HR均有所升高。就特定死因而言,沙林接触与 "其他 "循环系统疾病(不包括缺血性和脑血管疾病)导致的死亡(HR=1.41,95% CI 1.06 至 1.87)和酒精导致的死亡(HR=2.66,95% CI 1.40 至 5.07)有关。沙林接触与总体癌症发病率之间没有关联(HR=1.01,95% CI 0.93 至 1.10),但酒精相关肿瘤的癌症发病率较高(HR=1.24,95% CI 1.01 至 1.51):结论:在长达 50 年的随访中,沙林接触与死亡率的增加有关。结论:在长达 50 年的随访中,沙林接触与死亡率升高有关,酒精和 "其他 "循环系统疾病导致的死亡与沙林接触关系最为密切。
{"title":"Sarin exposure, mortality and cancer incidence in UK military veterans involved in human experiments at Porton Down: 52-year follow-up.","authors":"Gemma Archer, Thomas Keegan, Simon Wessely, Katherine M Venables, Nicola T Fear","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109525","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated whether UK military personnel exposed to sarin during the 'Service Volunteer Programme' at Porton Down had increased rates of mortality or cancer incidence over a 52-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A historical cohort study assembled from UK military records, comprising male veterans exposed to sarin during the 'Service Volunteer Programme' at Porton Down, UK (n=2975) and a comparison group of similar veterans who did not attend (n=2919). Mortality and cancer incidence data were obtained from national registries up to December 2019. Analysis was conducted using Cox regression adjusted for age, year of birth and service characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 52.2 years (range 2 days to 74.6 years), 1598 (53.7%) sarin-exposed veterans and 1583 (54.3%) non-exposed veterans died. Adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were raised for any sarin exposure (HR=1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16), two or more exposures (HR=1.25, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49) and higher doses (air >15 mg.min/m<sup>3</sup>) (HR=1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30). For cause-specific mortality, sarin exposure was associated with deaths from 'other' circulatory diseases (excludes ischaemic and cerebrovascular diseases) (HR=1.41, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.87) and alcohol-attributable deaths (HR=2.66, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.07). There was no association between sarin exposure and overall cancer incidence (HR=1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10), but cancer incidence was higher for alcohol-related neoplasms (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarin exposure was associated with increased rates of mortality over a 50-year follow-up. The strongest associations were observed for deaths attributable to alcohol and 'other' circulatory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"480-488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109456
Mireia Utzet, Clara Llorens-Serrano, Amaya Ayala-Garcia, Laura Esteve-Matalí, Albert Navarro-Giné, Amaia Bacigalupe
Goals: To describe the exposure to psychosocial risks at work and the consumption of psychotropic drugs and opioids among women working as cleaners; and to analyse the association between their exposure to psychosocial risks and drug use.
Methods: Observational cross-sectional study based on an online survey (collected during April and May 2021) from the wage-earning population in Spain. In this study, only women working in manual occupations were included (n=3430). Working conditions and drug consumption of cleaning workers were compared with those of other manual workers through bivariate analysis. The adjusted prevalence ratios and the corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust variance.
Results: Cleaning workers were older and had more problems making ends meet than other manual workers and were significantly more exposed to low possibilities for development (85.2 (95% CI 81.8 to 88.0)), high strain (51.9 (95% CI 47.3 to 55.9)) and low social support from colleagues (72.0 (95% CI 68.1 to 75.7)) and supervisors (61.7 (95% CI 57.3 to 65.6)). They also scored higher prevalence rates for the use of tranquillisers (37.7 (95% CI 32.0 to 43.3)) and opioids (33.3 (95% CI 27.9 to 38.6)) consumption indicators. This consumption was associated significantly with high strain exposure and high insecurity over working conditions.
Discussion: Under the umbrella of the 2012 labour reform, cleaning companies shift the pressure and burden they have on ordinary cleaning staff in the form of low wages and precarious working conditions. Our results imply that addressing adverse working conditions, mainly high strain and insecurity over working conditions, may significantly contribute to reducing the gender and social inequalities among cleaning workers.
目标描述从事清洁工作的女性在工作中面临的社会心理风险以及精神药物和阿片类药物的消费情况;分析她们面临的社会心理风险与药物使用之间的关联:观察性横断面研究基于一项在线调查(收集时间为 2021 年 4 月至 5 月),调查对象为西班牙的工薪人口。本研究仅包括从事体力劳动的女性(人数=3430)。通过双变量分析比较了清洁工人与其他体力劳动者的工作条件和药物消费情况。使用具有稳健方差的泊松回归模型估算了调整后的患病率和相应的 95% CI:结果:与其他体力劳动者相比,清洁工人的年龄更大,生计问题更多,他们面临的发展可能性低(85.2 (95% CI 81.8 to 88.0))、压力大(51.9 (95% CI 47.3 to 55.9))以及来自同事和上司的社会支持少(72.0 (95% CI 68.1 to 75.7))(61.7 (95% CI 57.3 to 65.6))的情况明显更多。他们使用镇静剂(37.7 (95% CI 32.0 to 43.3))和阿片类药物(33.3 (95% CI 27.9 to 38.6))的比例也较高。这与工作压力大和工作条件不安全有很大关系:在 2012 年劳动改革的保护伞下,清洁公司将低工资和不稳定工作条件的压力和负担转嫁给了普通清洁人员。我们的研究结果表明,解决不利的工作条件(主要是高负荷和工作条件不稳定)可能会大大有助于减少清洁工人中的性别和社会不平等现象。
{"title":"Women working as cleaners in Spain: working conditions and use of psychotropic drugs.","authors":"Mireia Utzet, Clara Llorens-Serrano, Amaya Ayala-Garcia, Laura Esteve-Matalí, Albert Navarro-Giné, Amaia Bacigalupe","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109456","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>To describe the exposure to psychosocial risks at work and the consumption of psychotropic drugs and opioids among women working as cleaners; and to analyse the association between their exposure to psychosocial risks and drug use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study based on an online survey (collected during April and May 2021) from the wage-earning population in Spain. In this study, only women working in manual occupations were included (n=3430). Working conditions and drug consumption of cleaning workers were compared with those of other manual workers through bivariate analysis. The adjusted prevalence ratios and the corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cleaning workers were older and had more problems making ends meet than other manual workers and were significantly more exposed to low possibilities for development (85.2 (95% CI 81.8 to 88.0)), high strain (51.9 (95% CI 47.3 to 55.9)) and low social support from colleagues (72.0 (95% CI 68.1 to 75.7)) and supervisors (61.7 (95% CI 57.3 to 65.6)). They also scored higher prevalence rates for the use of tranquillisers (37.7 (95% CI 32.0 to 43.3)) and opioids (33.3 (95% CI 27.9 to 38.6)) consumption indicators. This consumption was associated significantly with high strain exposure and high insecurity over working conditions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Under the umbrella of the 2012 labour reform, cleaning companies shift the pressure and burden they have on ordinary cleaning staff in the form of low wages and precarious working conditions. Our results imply that addressing adverse working conditions, mainly high strain and insecurity over working conditions, may significantly contribute to reducing the gender and social inequalities among cleaning workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"433-438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives The objectives were to assess the prospective associations between work-related factors, including psychosocial and physical work factors and working time/hours factors, and sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence. Methods The study relied on prospective data of a national representative sample of 16 129 employees followed up from 2013 to 2016 in France. Work-related factors were assessed in 2013 and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors and 4 physical work factors. Sickness presenteeism was studied using two items in 2016: the presence and duration of sickness presenteeism within the last 12 months. Weighted Hurdle and multinomial logistic regression models were performed to study the prospective associations between work-related factors at baseline and sickness presenteeism (both presence and duration) and sickness absence at follow-up. Models were adjusted for covariates. Results Almost all psychosocial and physical work factors were predictive of sickness presenteeism (ORs ranging from 1.30 to 2.07 for men, and from 1.16 to 2.30 for women) but only some of them predicted its duration. Dose–response associations were observed between multiple exposures to these factors and sickness presenteeism. These factors predicted more sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence than sickness absence alone. Gender differences were observed in these associations, as some associations were found to be stronger among women than among men. Conclusions There is a need to study sickness presenteeism and sickness absence combined. Prevention oriented towards the psychosocial and physical work environment may contribute to reduce sickness presenteeism and sickness absence. Data are available upon reasonable request.
{"title":"Associations between work-related factors and sickness presenteeism: a prospective study using the national French working conditions survey","authors":"Isabelle Niedhammer, Elodie Pineau, Sandrine Bertrais","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109202","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The objectives were to assess the prospective associations between work-related factors, including psychosocial and physical work factors and working time/hours factors, and sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence. Methods The study relied on prospective data of a national representative sample of 16 129 employees followed up from 2013 to 2016 in France. Work-related factors were assessed in 2013 and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors and 4 physical work factors. Sickness presenteeism was studied using two items in 2016: the presence and duration of sickness presenteeism within the last 12 months. Weighted Hurdle and multinomial logistic regression models were performed to study the prospective associations between work-related factors at baseline and sickness presenteeism (both presence and duration) and sickness absence at follow-up. Models were adjusted for covariates. Results Almost all psychosocial and physical work factors were predictive of sickness presenteeism (ORs ranging from 1.30 to 2.07 for men, and from 1.16 to 2.30 for women) but only some of them predicted its duration. Dose–response associations were observed between multiple exposures to these factors and sickness presenteeism. These factors predicted more sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence than sickness absence alone. Gender differences were observed in these associations, as some associations were found to be stronger among women than among men. Conclusions There is a need to study sickness presenteeism and sickness absence combined. Prevention oriented towards the psychosocial and physical work environment may contribute to reduce sickness presenteeism and sickness absence. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142203860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}