Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110093
Lucia Martin-Gisbert, Karl T Kelsey, Alberto Ruano-Ravina
{"title":"Are we underestimating indoor radon exposure in radon priority areas?","authors":"Lucia Martin-Gisbert, Karl T Kelsey, Alberto Ruano-Ravina","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110093","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"213-214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144258632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110262
Benjamin Laker
{"title":"Neglecting equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) is a choice with consequences for occupational health.","authors":"Benjamin Laker","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110262","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110262","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"211-212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144336788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109962
Emma Hutchinson, Ben Armstrong, Paul Wilkinson, James Milner
Background: The Warmth & Wellbeing pilot scheme provided home energy efficiency measures to people aged 55 years and over with chronic respiratory conditions in Dublin, Ireland from 2016 to 2020. We performed an observational study to evaluate the impact of the pilot scheme on health and well-being.
Methods: 955 people were recruited to the research, of which 545 had the following before-and-after data: self-reported general health and winter thermal comfort through a questionnaire and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) instruments, and monthly drug prescriptions. We analysed before-and-after differences using standard parametric methods.
Results: Health service contacts decreased after intervention, with general practitioner consultations over 6 months decreasing by 1.10 (95% CI 0.75, 1.44) and emergency room visits for respiratory conditions decreasing by 0.13 (95% CI 0.06, 0.21). Participants reported improvements in thermal comfort, temperature control, ability to pay fuel bills and comfort with inviting visitors to their home. There were improvements in physical health, general health, energy/fatigue and social well-being across most dimensions of EQ-5D, SGRQ and SF-36. For example, the EQ-5D summary score decreased by 5.36 (95% CI 2.68, 8.04). Monthly drug prescriptions in the year before intervention decreased by 0.14 (95% CI 0.06, 0.23) in the year afterwards. Most changes persisted for at least 2 years.
Conclusions: Dublin's Warmth & Wellbeing pilot scheme resulted in improvements in self-reported health and probable reductions in health service contacts and drug prescriptions. The health rationale supports targeted home energy efficiency programmes as part of climate change and energy objectives.
背景:2016年至2020年,爱尔兰都柏林的温暖与福祉试点计划为55岁及以上患有慢性呼吸系统疾病的人提供了家庭能效措施。我们进行了一项观察性研究,以评估试点计划对健康和福祉的影响。方法:共招募955人参加研究,其中545人有以下前后数据:通过问卷和EuroQol-5量表(EQ-5D)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和36项短表问卷(SF-36)自述一般健康状况和冬季热舒适,每月开具药物处方。我们使用标准参数方法分析了前后差异。结果:干预后卫生服务接触减少,6个月内全科医生咨询减少1.10 (95% CI 0.75, 1.44),呼吸系统疾病急诊室就诊减少0.13 (95% CI 0.06, 0.21)。参与者报告说,在热舒适、温度控制、支付燃料账单的能力和邀请访客到他们家的舒适度方面都有所改善。在EQ-5D、SGRQ和SF-36的大多数维度中,身体健康、一般健康、精力/疲劳和社会幸福感都有所改善。例如,EQ-5D综合评分下降了5.36 (95% CI 2.68, 8.04)。干预前一年每月药物处方比干预后一年减少0.14 (95% CI 0.06, 0.23)。大多数变化持续至少2年。结论:都柏林的温暖与福祉试点计划改善了自我报告的健康状况,并可能减少了卫生服务接触和药物处方。健康理论支持有针对性的家庭能源效率方案,作为气候变化和能源目标的一部分。
{"title":"Home energy efficiency improvements and health: observational before-and-after study of Dublin's Warmth & Wellbeing pilot scheme.","authors":"Emma Hutchinson, Ben Armstrong, Paul Wilkinson, James Milner","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109962","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Warmth & Wellbeing pilot scheme provided home energy efficiency measures to people aged 55 years and over with chronic respiratory conditions in Dublin, Ireland from 2016 to 2020. We performed an observational study to evaluate the impact of the pilot scheme on health and well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>955 people were recruited to the research, of which 545 had the following before-and-after data: self-reported general health and winter thermal comfort through a questionnaire and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) instruments, and monthly drug prescriptions. We analysed before-and-after differences using standard parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health service contacts decreased after intervention, with general practitioner consultations over 6 months decreasing by 1.10 (95% CI 0.75, 1.44) and emergency room visits for respiratory conditions decreasing by 0.13 (95% CI 0.06, 0.21). Participants reported improvements in thermal comfort, temperature control, ability to pay fuel bills and comfort with inviting visitors to their home. There were improvements in physical health, general health, energy/fatigue and social well-being across most dimensions of EQ-5D, SGRQ and SF-36. For example, the EQ-5D summary score decreased by 5.36 (95% CI 2.68, 8.04). Monthly drug prescriptions in the year before intervention decreased by 0.14 (95% CI 0.06, 0.23) in the year afterwards. Most changes persisted for at least 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dublin's Warmth & Wellbeing pilot scheme resulted in improvements in self-reported health and probable reductions in health service contacts and drug prescriptions. The health rationale supports targeted home energy efficiency programmes as part of climate change and energy objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144512247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110200
Ivan Pui Hung Au, Anne Smith, Peter O'Sullivan, Leo Ng, Nic Saraceni, Lesa Hoffman, Amity Campbell
Objectives: Lifting is a common self-reported aggravating factor associated with individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). However, there is a paucity of longitudinal studies with multiple measures on lifting spinal kinematics, pain, disability and pain-related cognitions. This study investigated the relationship between changes in these factors in people with lifting-related chronic LBP undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT).
Methods: 141 people with chronic LBP aggravated by lifting received a course of CFT over 13 weeks (average 4.8 sessions) and performed the same lifting task before each treatment session. Measures included range of motion (ROM) and velocity from trunk and pelvis inertial measurement units independently and the relative angle between units (lumbar angle). Participants reported (1) average pain intensity, (2) pain-related disability and (3) pain-related cognitions (pain catastrophising and pain self-efficacy) via online questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6 and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models evaluated associations between individual rates of changes over time for three selected kinematic measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM or lumbar ROM) with pain, disability, pain catastrophising and pain self-efficacy.
Results: Increased trunk velocity showed potentially large correlations with reduced disability (r=-0.60, 95% CI: -0.90, 0.09) and improved pain self-efficacy (r=0.64, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.93) over time, although there was statistical uncertainty for these estimates.
Conclusions: In people with lifting-related LBP undergoing CFT, increased trunk velocity during lifting showed potentially large correlations with reductions in disability and improvements in pain self-efficacy. These findings highlight the potential clinical importance of trunk velocity as both a monitoring measure and treatment target.
{"title":"Increases in trunk velocity during lifting are associated with improvements in disability and self-efficacy in people with chronic low back pain during cognitive functional therapy: a longitudinal analysis of the RESTORE trial.","authors":"Ivan Pui Hung Au, Anne Smith, Peter O'Sullivan, Leo Ng, Nic Saraceni, Lesa Hoffman, Amity Campbell","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110200","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lifting is a common self-reported aggravating factor associated with individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). However, there is a paucity of longitudinal studies with multiple measures on lifting spinal kinematics, pain, disability and pain-related cognitions. This study investigated the relationship between changes in these factors in people with lifting-related chronic LBP undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>141 people with chronic LBP aggravated by lifting received a course of CFT over 13 weeks (average 4.8 sessions) and performed the same lifting task before each treatment session. Measures included range of motion (ROM) and velocity from trunk and pelvis inertial measurement units independently and the relative angle between units (lumbar angle). Participants reported (1) average pain intensity, (2) pain-related disability and (3) pain-related cognitions (pain catastrophising and pain self-efficacy) via online questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6 and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models evaluated associations between individual rates of changes over time for three selected kinematic measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM or lumbar ROM) with pain, disability, pain catastrophising and pain self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased trunk velocity showed potentially large correlations with reduced disability (r=-0.60, 95% CI: -0.90, 0.09) and improved pain self-efficacy (r=0.64, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.93) over time, although there was statistical uncertainty for these estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In people with lifting-related LBP undergoing CFT, increased trunk velocity during lifting showed potentially large correlations with reductions in disability and improvements in pain self-efficacy. These findings highlight the potential clinical importance of trunk velocity as both a monitoring measure and treatment target.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144591872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110297
Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Stephen J Bertke, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Robert D Daniels
Objectives: Understanding of long-term lung cancer risks from radon decay products (RDP) exposure derives largely from studies of uranium miners. We aimed to compare mortality for lung and other cancers to the general population, to estimate excess absolute rate (EAR) and excess relative rate (ERR) from RDP exposure, and to estimate the joint effects of RDP and cigarette smoking in extended follow-up of a cohort of 4137 male uranium miners from the US Colorado Plateau.
Methods: We extended mortality follow-up through 2016 and re-evaluated RDP exposure against original work history and mine records. We calculated standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) compared with a regional population, evaluated EAR of lung cancer mortality using standardised rate ratios and modelled ERR using Cox proportional hazards regression. We evaluated interactions of RDP with smoking pack-years, attained age (AA) and time-since-exposure (TSE).
Results: There were 695 lung cancer deaths, including 146 among never-smokers and light smokers. The overall SMR was >4; the EAR per unit RDP exposure increased substantially with smoking pack-years and decades of follow-up. Lung cancer ERR decreased with AA and TSE. ERR attenuation at high exposure rates was smaller than observed elsewhere. Joint effects of RDP and smoking were submultiplicative but greater-than-additive, appearing closer to multiplicative at lower RDP exposures. Pancreas was the only other site showing a significantly positive ERR per unit exposure.
Conclusions: Excess rates of lung cancer mortality persist throughout the lifespan among this cohort of uranium miners. Information about RDP-smoking interactions is of interest for occupational and general population exposure.
{"title":"Updated cancer mortality among uranium miners on the Colorado Plateau: interactions of radon exposure with smoking and temporal factors.","authors":"Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Stephen J Bertke, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Robert D Daniels","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110297","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding of long-term lung cancer risks from radon decay products (RDP) exposure derives largely from studies of uranium miners. We aimed to compare mortality for lung and other cancers to the general population, to estimate excess absolute rate (EAR) and excess relative rate (ERR) from RDP exposure, and to estimate the joint effects of RDP and cigarette smoking in extended follow-up of a cohort of 4137 male uranium miners from the US Colorado Plateau.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extended mortality follow-up through 2016 and re-evaluated RDP exposure against original work history and mine records. We calculated standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) compared with a regional population, evaluated EAR of lung cancer mortality using standardised rate ratios and modelled ERR using Cox proportional hazards regression. We evaluated interactions of RDP with smoking pack-years, attained age (AA) and time-since-exposure (TSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 695 lung cancer deaths, including 146 among never-smokers and light smokers. The overall SMR was >4; the EAR per unit RDP exposure increased substantially with smoking pack-years and decades of follow-up. Lung cancer ERR decreased with AA and TSE. ERR attenuation at high exposure rates was smaller than observed elsewhere. Joint effects of RDP and smoking were submultiplicative but greater-than-additive, appearing closer to multiplicative at lower RDP exposures. Pancreas was the only other site showing a significantly positive ERR per unit exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excess rates of lung cancer mortality persist throughout the lifespan among this cohort of uranium miners. Information about RDP-smoking interactions is of interest for occupational and general population exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144512248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110105
Tuija Leskinen, Kristin Suorsa, Jesse Pasanen, Suvi Rovio, Harri Niinikoski, Olli Heinonen, Laura Pulkki-Råback, Jorma Viikari, Tapani Rönnemaa, Olli T Raitakari, Sari Stenholm, Katja Pahkala
Objectives: Studies on accelerometer-measured daily physical activity behaviour, especially among hybrid and remote workers, are scarce. We compared daily occupational and non-occupational physical activity and sedentary time among manual, in-office, hybrid and remote workers. In addition, physical activity behaviour during remote and office workdays among hybrid workers was compared.
Methods: Daily physical activity behaviour was collected with wrist-worn accelerometers on ≥4 days from 133 Finnish workers (31 years, 61% women). Participants were divided into four groups according to their work modes: manual (n=32), in-office (n=49), hybrid (n=35) and remote workers (n=17). Differences in physical activity and sedentary time during workdays (separately for occupational and non-occupational time) between the groups were examined using generalised linear models. Linear mixed models were used for intra-individual differences among hybrid workers.
Results: Workdays' occupational physical activity and sedentary time differed between the work mode groups (p<0.0001); the manual workers accumulated the highest occupational physical activity, while both hybrid and remote workers accumulated the highest occupational sedentary time. No differences in non-occupational behaviours were observed. Among hybrid workers, occupational sedentary time tended to be higher (26 min, 95% CI -2 to 53) during remote versus office workdays, but non-occupational behaviours were similar.
Conclusions: Remote work is associated with the lowest physical activity and the highest sedentary time compared with other work modes. Strategies to promote physical activity during remote workdays may be needed.
{"title":"Does accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time differ between manual, in-office, hybrid and remote workers?","authors":"Tuija Leskinen, Kristin Suorsa, Jesse Pasanen, Suvi Rovio, Harri Niinikoski, Olli Heinonen, Laura Pulkki-Råback, Jorma Viikari, Tapani Rönnemaa, Olli T Raitakari, Sari Stenholm, Katja Pahkala","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110105","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies on accelerometer-measured daily physical activity behaviour, especially among hybrid and remote workers, are scarce. We compared daily occupational and non-occupational physical activity and sedentary time among manual, in-office, hybrid and remote workers. In addition, physical activity behaviour during remote and office workdays among hybrid workers was compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Daily physical activity behaviour was collected with wrist-worn accelerometers on ≥4 days from 133 Finnish workers (31 years, 61% women). Participants were divided into four groups according to their work modes: manual (n=32), in-office (n=49), hybrid (n=35) and remote workers (n=17). Differences in physical activity and sedentary time during workdays (separately for occupational and non-occupational time) between the groups were examined using generalised linear models. Linear mixed models were used for intra-individual differences among hybrid workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workdays' occupational physical activity and sedentary time differed between the work mode groups (p<0.0001); the manual workers accumulated the highest occupational physical activity, while both hybrid and remote workers accumulated the highest occupational sedentary time. No differences in non-occupational behaviours were observed. Among hybrid workers, occupational sedentary time tended to be higher (26 min, 95% CI -2 to 53) during remote versus office workdays, but non-occupational behaviours were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote work is associated with the lowest physical activity and the highest sedentary time compared with other work modes. Strategies to promote physical activity during remote workdays may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"238-244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322443/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144497564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109928
Kristen W Van Buren, Carissa M Rocheleau, I-Chen Chen, Wayne T Sanderson, Leslie A MacDonald, Elizabeth A Masterson, Eirini Nestoridi, Elizabeth C Ailes
Objectives: We investigated associations between occupational noise and gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-related hypertension (including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia), preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) infants.
Methods: Data were analysed for 7889 singleton, live-born infants without major birth defects or chromosomal disorders and their mothers from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study from 1997 to 2011. Typical maternal occupational noise exposure in all jobs held from 1 month prior to conception through the end of pregnancy was estimated by expert rater and categorised as quiet (<60 A-weighted decibels (dBA)), low (60-75 dBA), moderate (76-84 dBA) or loud (>85 dBA). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate associations (adjusted ORs and 95% CIs) between noise exposure levels and outcomes.
Results: Approximately 77.4% of pregnant workers had quiet levels of occupational noise exposure, 11.0%, 10.1% and 1.5% had low, moderate and loud exposure levels, respectively. Compared with quiet levels of noise, pregnant workers exposed to low levels of noise had decreased odds of delivering an SGA infant (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.72; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) and those exposed to moderate levels had increased odds of delivering an SGA infant (aOR=1.37; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77). No other significant associations were observed.
Conclusion: Maternal occupational noise exposure below the 85 dBA threshold recognised as hazardous may be associated with SGA among infants. Elevated point estimates (>1) were observed for the highest noise exposure category and all outcomes, though CIs were wide and statistical significance was not attained. Further research is warranted to address existing knowledge gaps.
目的:研究职业性噪声与妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠高血压(包括先兆子痫/子痫)、早产和小于胎龄儿(SGA)的关系。方法:对1997 - 2011年全国出生缺陷预防研究中7889例无重大出生缺陷或染色体疾病的单胎、活产婴儿及其母亲的资料进行分析。从受孕前1个月到怀孕结束,所有工作中典型的母亲职业噪声暴露由专家评估,并归类为安静(85 dBA)。使用多元逻辑回归来估计噪声暴露水平与结果之间的关联(调整后的or和95% ci)。结果:约77.4%的怀孕女工处于安静的职业噪声暴露水平,11.0%、10.1%和1.5%分别处于低、中、高的职业噪声暴露水平。与安静的噪音水平相比,暴露于低噪音水平的怀孕工人分娩SGA婴儿的几率降低(调整OR =0.72;95% CI 0.53 ~ 0.99)和中等水平暴露者分娩SGA婴儿的几率增加(aOR=1.37;95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.77)。未观察到其他显著关联。结论:母亲职业噪声暴露低于85 dBA的危险阈值可能与婴儿SGA有关。在最高噪声暴露类别和所有结果中观察到升高的点估计值(>1),尽管ci很宽且未达到统计学意义。有必要进一步研究以解决现有的知识差距。
{"title":"Maternal occupational exposure to noise: prevalence, maternal effects and infant outcomes in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.","authors":"Kristen W Van Buren, Carissa M Rocheleau, I-Chen Chen, Wayne T Sanderson, Leslie A MacDonald, Elizabeth A Masterson, Eirini Nestoridi, Elizabeth C Ailes","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109928","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated associations between occupational noise and gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-related hypertension (including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia), preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analysed for 7889 singleton, live-born infants without major birth defects or chromosomal disorders and their mothers from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study from 1997 to 2011. Typical maternal occupational noise exposure in all jobs held from 1 month prior to conception through the end of pregnancy was estimated by expert rater and categorised as quiet (<60 A-weighted decibels (dBA)), low (60-75 dBA), moderate (76-84 dBA) or loud (>85 dBA). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate associations (adjusted ORs and 95% CIs) between noise exposure levels and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 77.4% of pregnant workers had quiet levels of occupational noise exposure, 11.0%, 10.1% and 1.5% had low, moderate and loud exposure levels, respectively. Compared with quiet levels of noise, pregnant workers exposed to low levels of noise had decreased odds of delivering an SGA infant (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.72; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) and those exposed to moderate levels had increased odds of delivering an SGA infant (aOR=1.37; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77). No other significant associations were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal occupational noise exposure below the 85 dBA threshold recognised as hazardous may be associated with SGA among infants. Elevated point estimates (>1) were observed for the highest noise exposure category and all outcomes, though CIs were wide and statistical significance was not attained. Further research is warranted to address existing knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362229/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144608945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110264
Thomas C Erren, Philip Lewis
{"title":"Many roads can lead to Rome: communicating occupational and environmental medicine.","authors":"Thomas C Erren, Philip Lewis","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110264","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110264","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144036945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110176
Jean-Michel Galarneau, Nicola Cherry
Objectives: To determine the effects of work exposures on fertility in tradeswomen.
Methods: Women apprenticed in welding and electrical trades across Canada were recruited (2011-2017) to a prospective cohort and contacted every 6 months for up to 5 years. At each contact, participants provided information on conceptions, sexual activity, birth control and pregnancy attempts. Occupational exposures to ergonomic factors and, for welders, to metals and dust in welding fume were estimated from task-specific questionnaires. The OR of clinical infertility for work in welding was estimated. Time ratios (TR), relative times to conception, were estimated for first pregnancy in an accelerated failure time (AFT) regression with a log normal distribution of the hazard, to assess the relation of exposure to conception.
Results: 885 women were recruited, 447 in welding and 438 in electrical trades. 96 reported a period of clinical infertility (prevalence 10.8%) with 70/96 infertile since joining the trade. There was no excess in welders (OR=0.81 95% CI 0.49 to 1.33). 372 women were nulliparous and met selection criteria for further analysis. In the final multivariable model for welders, TR was increased with working >8 days without a rest day (TR=3.06 95% CI 1.03 to 9.05), reporting hand-arm vibration for >1 h/day (TR=3.06 95% CI 1.13 to 8.34) and with increasing aluminium exposure (TR=1.38 95% CI 1.05 to 1.80). Among electrical workers, TR was increased in those working above shoulder height for ≥2 h/day (TR=1.88 95% CI 1.19 to 2.97).
Conclusion: Work in welding did not increase the risk of clinical infertility, but time to first pregnancy reflected preventable work exposures.
目的:探讨职业暴露对女工生育能力的影响。方法:招募加拿大各地的焊接和电气行业的女性学徒(2011-2017年)作为前瞻性队列,每6个月联系一次,长达5年。在每次接触中,参与者都提供了有关概念、性活动、避孕和怀孕企图的信息。职业接触人体工程学因素,以及焊工接触焊接烟尘中的金属和粉尘,是根据特定任务的调查问卷进行估计的。对临床焊接工作不孕的OR进行了估计。时间比率(TR),相对于受孕的时间,在加速失败时间(AFT)回归中估计首次怀孕与风险的对数正态分布,以评估暴露与受孕的关系。结果:共招募女性885人,其中焊接行业447人,电气行业438人。96人报告有一段时间的临床不孕症(患病率10.8%),其中70/96人在入行后不孕。没有多余的焊工(OR=0.81 95% CI 0.49至1.33)。372名未生育的妇女符合进一步分析的选择标准。在焊工的最终多变量模型中,TR随着工作>8天而不休息而增加(TR=3.06 95% CI 1.03至9.05),报告手臂振动>1小时/天(TR=3.06 95% CI 1.13至8.34)和增加铝暴露(TR=1.38 95% CI 1.05至1.80)。在电业工人中,在肩高以上工作≥2小时/天的工人TR增加(TR=1.88, 95% CI 1.19 ~ 2.97)。结论:焊接工作不增加临床不孕症的风险,但第一次怀孕的时间反映了可预防的工作暴露。
{"title":"Fertility in a prospective Canadian cohort of women in the welding and electrical trades.","authors":"Jean-Michel Galarneau, Nicola Cherry","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110176","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effects of work exposures on fertility in tradeswomen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women apprenticed in welding and electrical trades across Canada were recruited (2011-2017) to a prospective cohort and contacted every 6 months for up to 5 years. At each contact, participants provided information on conceptions, sexual activity, birth control and pregnancy attempts. Occupational exposures to ergonomic factors and, for welders, to metals and dust in welding fume were estimated from task-specific questionnaires. The OR of clinical infertility for work in welding was estimated. Time ratios (TR), relative times to conception, were estimated for first pregnancy in an accelerated failure time (AFT) regression with a log normal distribution of the hazard, to assess the relation of exposure to conception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>885 women were recruited, 447 in welding and 438 in electrical trades. 96 reported a period of clinical infertility (prevalence 10.8%) with 70/96 infertile since joining the trade. There was no excess in welders (OR=0.81 95% CI 0.49 to 1.33). 372 women were nulliparous and met selection criteria for further analysis. In the final multivariable model for welders, TR was increased with working >8 days without a rest day (TR=3.06 95% CI 1.03 to 9.05), reporting hand-arm vibration for >1 h/day (TR=3.06 95% CI 1.13 to 8.34) and with increasing aluminium exposure (TR=1.38 95% CI 1.05 to 1.80). Among electrical workers, TR was increased in those working above shoulder height for ≥2 h/day (TR=1.88 95% CI 1.19 to 2.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Work in welding did not increase the risk of clinical infertility, but time to first pregnancy reflected preventable work exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144608944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109991
Satu Soini, Katja Riina Ryynänen, Sari Nissinen, Jouko Miettunen, Leena Ala-Mursula
Objectives: This is the first study to use real-life electronic medical record data from occupational health (OH) primary care to evaluate how often physicians assess and confirm diagnoses' work relatedness (the definition implying causal or aggravating factors at work) in relation to the physicians' expertise, allocated appointment time and type of diagnosis.
Methods: We analysed registered data on face-to-face appointments with an occupational physician (n=70 163) at a Finnish OH service provider in 2020-2022, using cross tabulations and logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of assessments and conclusions that the diagnoses are work related, depending on whether the physician was specialised in OH, the appointment duration and the diagnoses' International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) categories.
Results: The work relatedness of diagnoses was assessed in 58.1% of appointments, most likely when appointments were longer and diagnoses belonged to the ICD-10 categories of injuries, mental disorders and rarely used 'other reasons for visiting healthcare' category. The main diagnosis was considered work related in 8.9% of the appointments, more likely when the physician was an OH specialist and the appointments were longer. In the adjusted models, the highest ORs (OR, 95% CI) for the diagnoses being classed as work related were in cases of mental disorders (5.82, 5.01 to 6.76), musculoskeletal diseases (7.46, 6.66 to 8.35) and injuries (18.14, 16.06 to 20.48).
Conclusion: Although a requirement, work relatedness was assessed in less than 60% of the appointments in OH primary care. Work-related diseases were rarely confirmed. Further research is required to find factors that could improve such assessments.
{"title":"Assessing the work relatedness of diagnoses in occupational health primary care appointments: a 3-year review of electronic medical records.","authors":"Satu Soini, Katja Riina Ryynänen, Sari Nissinen, Jouko Miettunen, Leena Ala-Mursula","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109991","DOIUrl":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is the first study to use real-life electronic medical record data from occupational health (OH) primary care to evaluate how often physicians assess and confirm diagnoses' work relatedness (the definition implying causal or aggravating factors at work) in relation to the physicians' expertise, allocated appointment time and type of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed registered data on face-to-face appointments with an occupational physician (n=70 163) at a Finnish OH service provider in 2020-2022, using cross tabulations and logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of assessments and conclusions that the diagnoses are work related, depending on whether the physician was specialised in OH, the appointment duration and the diagnoses' International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The work relatedness of diagnoses was assessed in 58.1% of appointments, most likely when appointments were longer and diagnoses belonged to the ICD-10 categories of injuries, mental disorders and rarely used 'other reasons for visiting healthcare' category. The main diagnosis was considered work related in 8.9% of the appointments, more likely when the physician was an OH specialist and the appointments were longer. In the adjusted models, the highest ORs (OR, 95% CI) for the diagnoses being classed as work related were in cases of mental disorders (5.82, 5.01 to 6.76), musculoskeletal diseases (7.46, 6.66 to 8.35) and injuries (18.14, 16.06 to 20.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a requirement, work relatedness was assessed in less than 60% of the appointments in OH primary care. Work-related diseases were rarely confirmed. Further research is required to find factors that could improve such assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"176-182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322384/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144111212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}