首页 > 最新文献

NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
A cross-country qualitative analysis of teachers' perceptions of asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa. 撒哈拉以南非洲教师对哮喘护理认知的跨国定性分析。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00354-7
Kimesh Loganathan Naidoo, Sindisiwa Dladla, Reratilwe Ephenia Mphahlele, Gioia Mosler, Sophie Muyemayema, Andrew Sentoogo Ssemata, Elizabeth Mkutumula, Olayinka Olufunke Adeyeye, Olayinka Goodman, Yetunde Kuyinu, Rebecca Nantanda, Emmanuel Addo-Yobo, Sandra Kwarteng Owusu, Bernhard Arhin, Ismail Ticklay, Hilda Angela Mujuru, Jonathan Grigg, Refiloe Masekela

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease among school-going adolescents worldwide. However, the burden of severe asthma is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore teachers' perceptions of asthma care across six African countries. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. FGDs were conducted in Kumasi(Ghana), Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda), and Harare (Zimbabwe) between 01 November 2020 and 30 June 2021. We identified two key themes related to asthma care; barriers to asthma care and suggestions to improve the care of adolescents with asthma. Barriers reported by teachers included a lack of knowledge and skills among themselves, adolescents, and caregivers. In addition, some traditional beliefs of teachers on asthma exacerbated challenges with asthma care in schools. Regarding suggestions, most teachers identified a need for all-inclusive asthma training programmes for teachers, adolescents and caregivers, focusing on acute episodes and mitigating triggers. Utilising teachers with personal experiences with asthma to advocate and support these initiatives was suggested. Further suggestions included the need for annual screening to enable early identification of adolescents with asthma and clarify restrictions on teachers administering asthma medications. Teachers across African schools identify multiple barriers to asthma care. Structured school education programs and annual asthma screening are key to addressing some barriers to care.

哮喘是世界各地上学青少年中最常见的慢性呼吸道疾病。然而,严重哮喘的负担在撒哈拉以南非洲最高。本研究旨在探讨六个非洲国家的教师对哮喘护理的看法。我们使用半结构化访谈指南进行了焦点小组讨论(FGD)。访谈是录音的,逐字逐句转录,并按主题进行分析。2020年11月1日至2021年6月30日,在库马西(加纳)、布兰太尔(马拉维)、拉各斯(尼日利亚)、德班(南非)、坎帕拉(乌干达)和哈拉雷(津巴布韦)进行了女性生殖器切割。我们确定了与哮喘护理相关的两个关键主题;哮喘护理的障碍和改善青少年哮喘护理的建议。教师报告的障碍包括他们自己、青少年和照顾者缺乏知识和技能。此外,教师对哮喘的一些传统信念加剧了学校哮喘护理的挑战。关于建议,大多数教师认为有必要为教师、青少年和护理人员提供包罗万象的哮喘培训方案,重点关注急性发作和缓解诱因。建议利用有哮喘个人经历的教师来倡导和支持这些举措。进一步的建议包括需要每年进行一次筛查,以便尽早发现患有哮喘的青少年,并澄清对教师服用哮喘药物的限制。非洲学校的教师发现了哮喘护理的多重障碍。结构化的学校教育计划和年度哮喘筛查是解决护理障碍的关键。
{"title":"A cross-country qualitative analysis of teachers' perceptions of asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Kimesh Loganathan Naidoo, Sindisiwa Dladla, Reratilwe Ephenia Mphahlele, Gioia Mosler, Sophie Muyemayema, Andrew Sentoogo Ssemata, Elizabeth Mkutumula, Olayinka Olufunke Adeyeye, Olayinka Goodman, Yetunde Kuyinu, Rebecca Nantanda, Emmanuel Addo-Yobo, Sandra Kwarteng Owusu, Bernhard Arhin, Ismail Ticklay, Hilda Angela Mujuru, Jonathan Grigg, Refiloe Masekela","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00354-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-023-00354-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease among school-going adolescents worldwide. However, the burden of severe asthma is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore teachers' perceptions of asthma care across six African countries. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. FGDs were conducted in Kumasi(Ghana), Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda), and Harare (Zimbabwe) between 01 November 2020 and 30 June 2021. We identified two key themes related to asthma care; barriers to asthma care and suggestions to improve the care of adolescents with asthma. Barriers reported by teachers included a lack of knowledge and skills among themselves, adolescents, and caregivers. In addition, some traditional beliefs of teachers on asthma exacerbated challenges with asthma care in schools. Regarding suggestions, most teachers identified a need for all-inclusive asthma training programmes for teachers, adolescents and caregivers, focusing on acute episodes and mitigating triggers. Utilising teachers with personal experiences with asthma to advocate and support these initiatives was suggested. Further suggestions included the need for annual screening to enable early identification of adolescents with asthma and clarify restrictions on teachers administering asthma medications. Teachers across African schools identify multiple barriers to asthma care. Structured school education programs and annual asthma screening are key to addressing some barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41138939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interaction of BMI and respiratory status in obstructive sleep apnea, a cross-sectional COPD study. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中BMI与呼吸状态的相互作用,一项COPD横断面研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00351-w
Mizuha Haraguchi Hashiguchi, Shotaro Chubachi, Wakako Yamasawa, Kengo Otsuka, Naoko Harada, Naoki Miyao, Hidetoshi Nakamura, Koichiro Asano, Kazuhiro Yamaguchi, Koichi Fukunaga

This cross-sectional study of 136 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) investigated the mechanism underlying overlap syndrome, defined as coexisting COPD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OSA was defined as a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 5 events/h, determined using type-3 portable monitors. The mean REI was 12.8 events/h. Most participants (60.1%) had mild OSA (REI: 5-15 events/h). The REI was positively correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.24, p = 0.005), and fat-free mass index (r = 0.31, p = 0.005), and negatively correlated with residual volume divided by total lung capacity (r = -0.27, p = 0.003). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an optimal BMI cutoff of 21.96 kg/m2 for predicting moderate/severe OSA. A BMI ≥ 21.96 kg/m2 was associated with OSA among participants with %FEV1 ≥ 50%, but not those with %FEV1 < 50%. This study revealed an interaction between airflow limitation and hyperinflation, nutritional status, and OSA.

这项针对136名慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的横断面研究调查了重叠综合征的潜在机制,重叠综合征被定义为COPD和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)共存。OSA被定义为呼吸事件指数(REI) ≥ 5个事件/小时,使用类型3便携式监视器确定。平均REI为12.8次/h。大多数参与者(60.1%)患有轻度OSA(REI:5-15次/小时)。REI与1秒用力呼气量(%FEV1)呈正相关(r = 0.33,p 2用于预测中度/重度OSA。BMI ≥ 21.96 在FEV1为%的参与者中,kg/m2与OSA相关 ≥ 50%,但FEV1为%的患者除外
{"title":"Interaction of BMI and respiratory status in obstructive sleep apnea, a cross-sectional COPD study.","authors":"Mizuha Haraguchi Hashiguchi, Shotaro Chubachi, Wakako Yamasawa, Kengo Otsuka, Naoko Harada, Naoki Miyao, Hidetoshi Nakamura, Koichiro Asano, Kazuhiro Yamaguchi, Koichi Fukunaga","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00351-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-023-00351-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study of 136 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) investigated the mechanism underlying overlap syndrome, defined as coexisting COPD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OSA was defined as a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 5 events/h, determined using type-3 portable monitors. The mean REI was 12.8 events/h. Most participants (60.1%) had mild OSA (REI: 5-15 events/h). The REI was positively correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV<sub>1</sub>) (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.24, p = 0.005), and fat-free mass index (r = 0.31, p = 0.005), and negatively correlated with residual volume divided by total lung capacity (r = -0.27, p = 0.003). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an optimal BMI cutoff of 21.96 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for predicting moderate/severe OSA. A BMI ≥ 21.96 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was associated with OSA among participants with %FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥ 50%, but not those with %FEV<sub>1</sub> < 50%. This study revealed an interaction between airflow limitation and hyperinflation, nutritional status, and OSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10394559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in a general population sample. 慢性合并症和哮喘加重发生在一般人群样本中。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00350-x
Emma Baljet, Hilde Luijks, Lisette van den Bemt, Tjard R Schermer

Chronic comorbid conditions are common in adults with asthma, and some may influence a patient's asthma exacerbation risk. We explored associations between eighteen chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in adults with asthma in a cross-sectional study nested within a cohort study using data from the two-yearly US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program. Data of 2387 adults with self-reported doctor-diagnosed current asthma from the 2007 to 2018 NHANES surveys were selected. Investigated chronic comorbidities were: angina pectoris; congestive heart failure; coronary heart disease; depression; diabetes mellitus; soft and hard drug use; gastroesophageal reflux; gout; history of heart attack; history of stroke; hypercholesterolemia; hypertension; kidney failure; liver conditions; obesity; rheumatoid arthritis; and thyroid problems. Outcome was defined as asthma exacerbation category: no, moderate, or severe exacerbation(s) in the past year. Ordinal logistic regression analysis with correction for potential confounders was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for moderate or severe exacerbations. Observed associations with increased severe asthma exacerbation occurrence were: obesity (OR = 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.24, 2.26), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.55; 1.04, 2.30). History of stroke (OR = 1.95; 1.22, 3.11) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.33; 1.00, 1.75) showed associations with increased moderate exacerbation occurrence. Age-stratified analysis showed soft drug use, obesity, depression, thyroid problems, and rheumatoid arthritis to be associated with moderate and/or severe exacerbation occurrence in one or more 10-year age strata. In conclusion, several chronic comorbid conditions were associated with asthma exacerbation occurrence, which confirms but also complements previous studies. Our observations contribute to understanding exacerbation risk estimation and, ultimately, personalized asthma management.

慢性合并症在成人哮喘患者中很常见,其中一些可能会影响患者哮喘恶化的风险。我们利用两年一次的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)项目的数据,在一项横断面研究中探讨了成人哮喘患者18种慢性合并症与哮喘加重发生率之间的关系。选择了2007年至2018年NHANES调查中2387名自我报告的医生诊断的哮喘成年人的数据。调查的慢性合并症有:心绞痛;充血性心力衰竭;冠心病;抑郁症;糖尿病;软性和硬性药物使用;胃食管反流;痛风;心脏病发作史;中风史;高胆固醇血症;高血压;肾功能衰竭;肝脏条件;肥胖;类风湿性关节炎;还有甲状腺问题。结果定义为哮喘加重类别:过去一年无、中度或重度加重。使用校正潜在混杂因素的有序逻辑回归分析来估计中度或重度恶化的优势比(OR)。观察到与严重哮喘加重发生率增加相关的有:肥胖(OR = 1.67;95%可信区间1.24,2.26)和类风湿关节炎(OR = 1.55;1.04, 2.30)。卒中史(OR = 1.95;1.22, 3.11)和类风湿关节炎(OR = 1.33;1.00, 1.75)与中度加重发生率增加有关。年龄分层分析显示,软性药物使用、肥胖、抑郁、甲状腺问题和类风湿性关节炎在一个或多个10岁年龄组中与中度和/或重度加重有关。总之,几种慢性合并症与哮喘加重的发生有关,这证实了但也补充了先前的研究。我们的观察结果有助于理解急性发作风险评估,并最终实现个性化哮喘管理。
{"title":"Chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in a general population sample.","authors":"Emma Baljet, Hilde Luijks, Lisette van den Bemt, Tjard R Schermer","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00350-x","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-023-00350-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic comorbid conditions are common in adults with asthma, and some may influence a patient's asthma exacerbation risk. We explored associations between eighteen chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in adults with asthma in a cross-sectional study nested within a cohort study using data from the two-yearly US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program. Data of 2387 adults with self-reported doctor-diagnosed current asthma from the 2007 to 2018 NHANES surveys were selected. Investigated chronic comorbidities were: angina pectoris; congestive heart failure; coronary heart disease; depression; diabetes mellitus; soft and hard drug use; gastroesophageal reflux; gout; history of heart attack; history of stroke; hypercholesterolemia; hypertension; kidney failure; liver conditions; obesity; rheumatoid arthritis; and thyroid problems. Outcome was defined as asthma exacerbation category: no, moderate, or severe exacerbation(s) in the past year. Ordinal logistic regression analysis with correction for potential confounders was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for moderate or severe exacerbations. Observed associations with increased severe asthma exacerbation occurrence were: obesity (OR = 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.24, 2.26), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.55; 1.04, 2.30). History of stroke (OR = 1.95; 1.22, 3.11) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.33; 1.00, 1.75) showed associations with increased moderate exacerbation occurrence. Age-stratified analysis showed soft drug use, obesity, depression, thyroid problems, and rheumatoid arthritis to be associated with moderate and/or severe exacerbation occurrence in one or more 10-year age strata. In conclusion, several chronic comorbid conditions were associated with asthma exacerbation occurrence, which confirms but also complements previous studies. Our observations contribute to understanding exacerbation risk estimation and, ultimately, personalized asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421910/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10358353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care. 金色2023:初级保健的亮点。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00349-4
Alvar Agustí, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Miguel Roman, Claus F Vogelmeier
{"title":"Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.","authors":"Alvar Agustí,&nbsp;Antoni Sisó-Almirall,&nbsp;Miguel Roman,&nbsp;Claus F Vogelmeier","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00349-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00349-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10300356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rational use of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD. 合理使用吸入性皮质类固醇治疗慢性阻塞性肺病。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00347-6
Jennifer K Quint, Amnon Ariel, Peter J Barnes

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of treatment for asthma, but their role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is debated. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients with COPD and frequent or severe exacerbations demonstrated a significant reduction (~25%) in exacerbations with ICS in combination with dual bronchodilator therapy (triple therapy). However, the suggestion of a mortality benefit associated with ICS in these trials has since been rejected by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. Observational evidence from routine clinical practice demonstrates that dual bronchodilation is associated with better clinical outcomes than triple therapy in a broad population of patients with COPD and infrequent exacerbations. This reinforces guideline recommendations that ICS-containing maintenance therapy should be reserved for patients with frequent or severe exacerbations and high blood eosinophils (~10% of the COPD population), or those with concomitant asthma. However, data from routine clinical practice indicate ICS overuse, with up to 50-80% of patients prescribed ICS. Prescription of ICS in patients not fulfilling guideline criteria puts patients at unnecessary risk of pneumonia and other long-term adverse events and also has cost implications, without any clear benefit in disease control. In this article, we review the benefits and risks of ICS use in COPD, drawing on evidence from RCTs and observational studies conducted in primary care. We also provide a practical guide to prescribing ICS, based on the latest global treatment guidelines, to help primary care providers identify patients for whom the benefits of ICS outweigh the risks.

吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)是治疗哮喘的主要方法,但其在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中的作用仍存在争议。最近在COPD患者中进行的随机对照试验(RCTs)和频繁或严重的急性加重表明,ICS联合双重支气管扩张剂治疗(三联治疗)可显著减少急性加重(~25%)。然而,在这些试验中与ICS相关的死亡率益处的建议已被欧洲药品管理局和美国食品和药物管理局拒绝。常规临床实践的观察性证据表明,在广泛的COPD患者人群中,双重支气管扩张比三联治疗具有更好的临床结果。这加强了指南的建议,即含有ics的维持治疗应保留给频繁或严重恶化和高血嗜酸性粒细胞(约占COPD人群的10%)或合并哮喘的患者。然而,来自常规临床实践的数据表明ICS过度使用,高达50-80%的患者使用ICS。在不符合指南标准的患者中使用ICS会使患者面临不必要的肺炎和其他长期不良事件风险,并且还会产生成本影响,在疾病控制方面没有任何明显的益处。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了在COPD中使用ICS的益处和风险,借鉴了在初级保健中进行的随机对照试验和观察性研究的证据。我们还根据最新的全球治疗指南提供了开具ICS处方的实用指南,以帮助初级保健提供者识别ICS的益处大于风险的患者。
{"title":"Rational use of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD.","authors":"Jennifer K Quint,&nbsp;Amnon Ariel,&nbsp;Peter J Barnes","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00347-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00347-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of treatment for asthma, but their role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is debated. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients with COPD and frequent or severe exacerbations demonstrated a significant reduction (~25%) in exacerbations with ICS in combination with dual bronchodilator therapy (triple therapy). However, the suggestion of a mortality benefit associated with ICS in these trials has since been rejected by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. Observational evidence from routine clinical practice demonstrates that dual bronchodilation is associated with better clinical outcomes than triple therapy in a broad population of patients with COPD and infrequent exacerbations. This reinforces guideline recommendations that ICS-containing maintenance therapy should be reserved for patients with frequent or severe exacerbations and high blood eosinophils (~10% of the COPD population), or those with concomitant asthma. However, data from routine clinical practice indicate ICS overuse, with up to 50-80% of patients prescribed ICS. Prescription of ICS in patients not fulfilling guideline criteria puts patients at unnecessary risk of pneumonia and other long-term adverse events and also has cost implications, without any clear benefit in disease control. In this article, we review the benefits and risks of ICS use in COPD, drawing on evidence from RCTs and observational studies conducted in primary care. We also provide a practical guide to prescribing ICS, based on the latest global treatment guidelines, to help primary care providers identify patients for whom the benefits of ICS outweigh the risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10232929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Our contribution to systematic review and meta-analysis in primary care respiratory medicine. 我们对初级保健呼吸医学系统评价和荟萃分析的贡献。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00348-5
Tiago Maricoto, Ioanna Tsiligianni
{"title":"Our contribution to systematic review and meta-analysis in primary care respiratory medicine.","authors":"Tiago Maricoto,&nbsp;Ioanna Tsiligianni","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00348-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00348-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338516/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9813487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population. 对初级保健人群中测量儿童哮喘控制的问卷进行系统回顾。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9
Sara Bousema, Arthur M Bohnen, Patrick J E Bindels, Gijs Elshout

Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5-18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5-18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians' '3 questions' (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated 'intermediate' or 'poor'. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care.

一些调查问卷用于测量儿童哮喘控制情况。在初级保健中使用的最适当工具尚未确定。在这篇系统综述中,我们评估了用于测量初级保健儿童哮喘控制的问卷,并确定了它们在哮喘管理中的有用性。在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Google Scholar和Cochrane数据库中进行检索,截止日期为2022年6月24日。研究人群包括5-18岁患有哮喘的儿童。三位审稿人独立筛选研究并提取数据。使用COSMIN健康状况调查表测量特性的标准,对研究的方法学质量进行了评估。如果对至少两份问卷进行比较,则包括在初级保健中进行的研究。二级或三级护理研究和生活质量问卷研究被排除在外。异质性排除了meta分析。纳入了五篇出版物:四项观察性研究和一项随机对照试验的子研究。共纳入806名儿童(5-18岁)。我们评估了哮喘控制测试(ACT)、儿童哮喘控制测试(c-ACT)、哮喘APGAR系统、NAEPP标准和英国皇家医师学院的“3题”(RCP3Q)。这些问卷评估不同的症状和领域。大多数研究的质量被评为“中等”或“较差”。大多数被评估的问卷没有显示出彼此之间的实质性一致,这使得比较具有挑战性。基于目前的综述,我们认为哮喘APGAR系统似乎有希望作为确定初级保健儿童哮喘控制的问卷。
{"title":"A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population.","authors":"Sara Bousema,&nbsp;Arthur M Bohnen,&nbsp;Patrick J E Bindels,&nbsp;Gijs Elshout","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5-18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5-18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians' '3 questions' (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated 'intermediate' or 'poor'. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9869387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effective respiratory management of asthma and COPD and the environmental impacts of inhalers. 哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病的有效呼吸管理以及吸入器对环境的影响。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00346-7
Omar S Usmani, Mark L Levy
{"title":"Effective respiratory management of asthma and COPD and the environmental impacts of inhalers.","authors":"Omar S Usmani, Mark L Levy","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00346-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-023-00346-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10120734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic spirometry in COPD is increasing, a comparison of two Swedish cohorts. 两个瑞典队列的比较表明,COPD的肺量测定诊断正在增加。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00345-8
Åsa Athlin, Karin Lisspers, Mikael Hasselgren, Björn Ställberg, Christer Janson, Scott Montgomery, Maaike Giezeman, Marta Kisiel, Anna Nager, Hanna Sandelowsky, Mats Arne, Josefin Sundh

Spirometry should be used to confirm a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This test is not always performed, leading to possible misdiagnosis. We investigated whether the proportion of patients with diagnostic spirometry has increased over time as well as factors associated with omitted or incorrectly interpreted spirometry. Data from medical reviews and a questionnaire from primary and secondary care patients with a doctors' diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010 were collected. Data were compared with a COPD cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2003. Among 703 patients with a first diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010, 88% had a diagnostic spirometry, compared with 59% (p < 0.001) in the previous cohort. Factors associated with not having diagnostic spirometry were current smoking (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.36-3.60), low educational level (OR 1.81; 1.09-3.02) and management in primary care (OR 2.28; 1.02-5.14). The correct interpretation of spirometry results increased (75% vs 82%; p = 0.010). Among patients with a repeated spirometry, 94% had a persistent FEV1/FVC or FEV1/VC ratio <0.70.

肺活量测定应用于确认慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断。这种测试并不总是进行,可能导致误诊。我们调查了诊断性肺活量测定的患者比例是否随着时间的推移而增加,以及与遗漏或错误解释肺活量测定相关的因素。收集了2004年至2010年间被医生诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的初级和二级保健患者的医学综述和问卷调查数据。数据与2000年至2003年间诊断的COPD队列进行了比较。在2004年至2010年间首次诊断为COPD的703例患者中,88%的患者有诊断性肺活量测定法,相比之下,59% (p 1/FVC或FEV1/VC)
{"title":"Diagnostic spirometry in COPD is increasing, a comparison of two Swedish cohorts.","authors":"Åsa Athlin,&nbsp;Karin Lisspers,&nbsp;Mikael Hasselgren,&nbsp;Björn Ställberg,&nbsp;Christer Janson,&nbsp;Scott Montgomery,&nbsp;Maaike Giezeman,&nbsp;Marta Kisiel,&nbsp;Anna Nager,&nbsp;Hanna Sandelowsky,&nbsp;Mats Arne,&nbsp;Josefin Sundh","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00345-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00345-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spirometry should be used to confirm a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This test is not always performed, leading to possible misdiagnosis. We investigated whether the proportion of patients with diagnostic spirometry has increased over time as well as factors associated with omitted or incorrectly interpreted spirometry. Data from medical reviews and a questionnaire from primary and secondary care patients with a doctors' diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010 were collected. Data were compared with a COPD cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2003. Among 703 patients with a first diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010, 88% had a diagnostic spirometry, compared with 59% (p < 0.001) in the previous cohort. Factors associated with not having diagnostic spirometry were current smoking (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.36-3.60), low educational level (OR 1.81; 1.09-3.02) and management in primary care (OR 2.28; 1.02-5.14). The correct interpretation of spirometry results increased (75% vs 82%; p = 0.010). Among patients with a repeated spirometry, 94% had a persistent FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC or FEV<sub>1</sub>/VC ratio <0.70.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9574016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anticipated barriers and facilitators for implementing smart inhalers in asthma medication adherence management. 在哮喘药物依从性管理中实施智能吸入器的预期障碍和促进因素。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-20 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00343-w
Susanne J van de Hei, Nilouq Stoker, Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok, Charlotte C Poot, Eline Meijer, Maarten J Postma, Niels H Chavannes, Janwillem W H Kocks, Job F M van Boven

Smart inhalers are electronic monitoring devices which are promising in increasing medication adherence and maintaining asthma control. A multi-stakeholder capacity and needs assessment is recommended prior to implementation in healthcare systems. This study aimed to explore perceptions of stakeholders and to identify anticipated facilitators and barriers associated with the implementation of smart digital inhalers in the Dutch healthcare system. Data were collected through focus group discussions with female patients with asthma (n = 9) and healthcare professionals (n = 7) and through individual semi-structured interviews with policy makers (n = 4) and smart inhaler developers (n = 4). Data were analysed using the Framework method. Five themes were identified: (i) perceived benefits, (ii) usability, (iii) feasibility, (iv) payment and reimbursement, and (v) data safety and ownership. In total, 14 barriers and 32 facilitators were found among all stakeholders. The results of this study could contribute to the design of a tailored implementation strategy for smart inhalers in daily practice.

智能吸入器是一种电子监测设备,有望增加药物依从性和维持哮喘控制。建议在卫生保健系统实施之前进行多利益攸关方能力和需求评估。本研究旨在探讨利益相关者的看法,并确定与荷兰医疗保健系统中智能数字吸入器实施相关的预期促进因素和障碍。通过与女性哮喘患者(n = 9)和医疗保健专业人员(n = 7)的焦点小组讨论,以及与政策制定者(n = 4)和智能吸入器开发人员(n = 4)的个人半结构化访谈,收集数据。采用Framework方法对数据进行分析。确定了五个主题:(i)感知收益,(ii)可用性,(iii)可行性,(iv)支付和报销,以及(v)数据安全性和所有权。在所有利益相关者中,总共发现了14个障碍和32个促进因素。这项研究的结果可能有助于在日常实践中为智能吸入器设计量身定制的实施策略。
{"title":"Anticipated barriers and facilitators for implementing smart inhalers in asthma medication adherence management.","authors":"Susanne J van de Hei,&nbsp;Nilouq Stoker,&nbsp;Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok,&nbsp;Charlotte C Poot,&nbsp;Eline Meijer,&nbsp;Maarten J Postma,&nbsp;Niels H Chavannes,&nbsp;Janwillem W H Kocks,&nbsp;Job F M van Boven","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00343-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00343-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smart inhalers are electronic monitoring devices which are promising in increasing medication adherence and maintaining asthma control. A multi-stakeholder capacity and needs assessment is recommended prior to implementation in healthcare systems. This study aimed to explore perceptions of stakeholders and to identify anticipated facilitators and barriers associated with the implementation of smart digital inhalers in the Dutch healthcare system. Data were collected through focus group discussions with female patients with asthma (n = 9) and healthcare professionals (n = 7) and through individual semi-structured interviews with policy makers (n = 4) and smart inhaler developers (n = 4). Data were analysed using the Framework method. Five themes were identified: (i) perceived benefits, (ii) usability, (iii) feasibility, (iv) payment and reimbursement, and (v) data safety and ownership. In total, 14 barriers and 32 facilitators were found among all stakeholders. The results of this study could contribute to the design of a tailored implementation strategy for smart inhalers in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9944716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1