首页 > 最新文献

NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Can we measure whether asthma guidelines lead to improved care? 我们能否衡量哮喘指南是否改善了护理?
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00379-6
Ronnie Tan, Anna Murphy, Chris Brightling, Dominick Shaw

The British Thoracic Society (BTS) and Scottish Intercollege Guidelines Network (SIGN), as well as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), have previously produced separate asthma guidance differing in some key aspects in diagnosis and management leading to confusion, potentially hampering guideline dissemination and uptake. While there are inherent challenges, the upcoming release of new joint BTS/SIGN/NICE asthma guidance presents an opportunity to assess guideline adoption and its impact on clinical practice. The use of prescription data via databases such as OpenPrescribing can be used as a surrogate for guideline adoption and potentially linked to clinical outcomes such as hospital episode statistics (HES). The potential recommendation for anti-inflammatory reliever therapy (AIR) and maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) with inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol combination therapy in the next iteration of UK asthma guidance will require the accurate coding for the respective therapeutic approaches on prescribing platforms in order to assess their impact in real-life clinical practice. This could then direct targeted measures to improve wider guidance adoption leading to better clinical care in asthma based on up to date evidence.

英国胸科学会 (BTS) 和苏格兰校际指南网络 (SIGN) 以及英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所 (NICE) 以前曾分别发布过哮喘指南,但在诊断和管理的一些关键方面存在差异,导致混乱,可能会阻碍指南的传播和采用。虽然存在固有的挑战,但即将发布的新 BTS/SIGN/NICE 联合哮喘指南为评估指南的采用情况及其对临床实践的影响提供了机会。通过 OpenPrescribing 等数据库使用处方数据可作为指南采用情况的替代指标,并有可能与医院病例统计(HES)等临床结果相关联。在下一版英国哮喘指南中,可能会推荐抗炎缓解疗法(AIR)和吸入皮质类固醇/福莫特罗联合疗法(MART),这就需要在处方平台上对相应的治疗方法进行准确编码,以评估其在实际临床实践中的影响。这样就可以采取有针对性的措施,改进指南的广泛采用,从而在最新证据的基础上改善哮喘的临床治疗。
{"title":"Can we measure whether asthma guidelines lead to improved care?","authors":"Ronnie Tan, Anna Murphy, Chris Brightling, Dominick Shaw","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00379-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00379-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The British Thoracic Society (BTS) and Scottish Intercollege Guidelines Network (SIGN), as well as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), have previously produced separate asthma guidance differing in some key aspects in diagnosis and management leading to confusion, potentially hampering guideline dissemination and uptake. While there are inherent challenges, the upcoming release of new joint BTS/SIGN/NICE asthma guidance presents an opportunity to assess guideline adoption and its impact on clinical practice. The use of prescription data via databases such as OpenPrescribing can be used as a surrogate for guideline adoption and potentially linked to clinical outcomes such as hospital episode statistics (HES). The potential recommendation for anti-inflammatory reliever therapy (AIR) and maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) with inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol combination therapy in the next iteration of UK asthma guidance will require the accurate coding for the respective therapeutic approaches on prescribing platforms in order to assess their impact in real-life clinical practice. This could then direct targeted measures to improve wider guidance adoption leading to better clinical care in asthma based on up to date evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211455/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141469742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Asthma and COPD management of patients with intellectual disabilities in general practice. 全科医生对智障患者的哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病管理。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00375-w
Mathilde Mastebroek, Nadeem C M Everlo, Maarten Cuypers, Erik W M A Bischoff, Bianca W M Schalk

People with intellectual disabilities experience overall poorer health and healthcare access than the general population. It is largely unknown how this applies to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management by general practitioners (GPs). In a 10-year retrospective matched cohort study, n = 34,429, we examined year prevalence of asthma and COPD in adult patients with and without intellectual disabilities and potential differences in the delivery of asthma and COPD disease management activities in Dutch general practices (2010-2019). We collected information on patient characteristics, comorbidity, consultation patterns, use and outcomes of asthma/COPD control questionnaires, spirometry measurement, pulmonology referrals, and prescribed medication. Asthma patients with intellectual disabilities suffered more frequently from obesity (53.2% vs. 39.5% without intellectual disabilities), and both asthma and COPD patients with intellectual disabilities were more frequently current smokers (45.2% vs. 22.1% without intellectual disabilities, and 76.6% vs. 51.4% without intellectual disabilities, respectively). Also, a statistically significant larger number of asthma patients with intellectual disabilities were prescribed antibiotics (69.9% vs. 54.5%). COPD patients with intellectual disabilities, compared with matched controls without intellectual disabilities, received significantly more often either no COPD-related practice consultation at all (respectively 20.8% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.004) or a large number of practice consultations (>31 consultations, respectively 16.7% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.004). For asthma, there was no statistical difference between patients with or without intellectual disabilities regarding the number and type of consultations. The asthma year point prevalence in patients with intellectual disabilities was, from 2014 onward, significantly higher, and in 2019 was 8.7% vs. 6.0% for people without intellectual disabilities. For COPD, it was comparable in both groups. Both asthma and COPD patients with intellectual disabilities appeared considerably younger in age than patients without intellectual disabilities. Our findings warrant further research into the causes of the differences found for asthma and COPD and whether they also infer differences in the quality or the effectiveness of GP disease management, especially for young adults with intellectual disabilities.

与普通人相比,智障人士的健康状况和获得医疗服务的机会总体较差。全科医生(GPs)对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的管理情况如何,目前还不得而知。在一项为期 10 年(n = 34,429 人)的回顾性匹配队列研究中,我们调查了智障和非智障成年患者的哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患病率,以及荷兰全科医生在开展哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病疾病管理活动方面的潜在差异(2010-2019 年)。我们收集了有关患者特征、合并症、就诊模式、哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺病控制问卷的使用和结果、肺活量测量、肺科转诊和处方药的信息。有智力障碍的哮喘病人更经常患有肥胖症(53.2% 比无智力障碍的 39.5%),有智力障碍的哮喘病人和慢性阻塞性肺病病人更经常吸烟(分别为 45.2% 比无智力障碍的 22.1% 和 76.6% 比无智力障碍的 51.4%)。此外,智障哮喘患者服用抗生素的比例也明显高于非智障患者(分别为 69.9% 和 54.5%)。与配对的非智障对照组相比,智障慢性阻塞性肺病患者接受完全不与慢性阻塞性肺病相关的诊治(分别为 20.8% 对 8.5%,P = 0.004)或接受大量诊治(超过 31 次诊治,分别为 16.7% 对 5.3%,P = 0.004)的比例明显更高。就哮喘而言,有智力障碍与无智力障碍的患者在就诊次数和就诊类型方面没有统计学差异。从2014年起,智障患者的哮喘年点患病率明显较高,2019年为8.7%,而非智障患者为6.0%。至于慢性阻塞性肺病,两组患者的发病率相当。智障哮喘患者和慢性阻塞性肺病患者的年龄都比非智障患者小很多。我们的研究结果值得进一步研究哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病的差异原因,以及这些差异是否也推断出全科医生疾病管理的质量或效果存在差异,尤其是对智障的年轻成年人而言。
{"title":"Asthma and COPD management of patients with intellectual disabilities in general practice.","authors":"Mathilde Mastebroek, Nadeem C M Everlo, Maarten Cuypers, Erik W M A Bischoff, Bianca W M Schalk","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00375-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00375-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with intellectual disabilities experience overall poorer health and healthcare access than the general population. It is largely unknown how this applies to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management by general practitioners (GPs). In a 10-year retrospective matched cohort study, n = 34,429, we examined year prevalence of asthma and COPD in adult patients with and without intellectual disabilities and potential differences in the delivery of asthma and COPD disease management activities in Dutch general practices (2010-2019). We collected information on patient characteristics, comorbidity, consultation patterns, use and outcomes of asthma/COPD control questionnaires, spirometry measurement, pulmonology referrals, and prescribed medication. Asthma patients with intellectual disabilities suffered more frequently from obesity (53.2% vs. 39.5% without intellectual disabilities), and both asthma and COPD patients with intellectual disabilities were more frequently current smokers (45.2% vs. 22.1% without intellectual disabilities, and 76.6% vs. 51.4% without intellectual disabilities, respectively). Also, a statistically significant larger number of asthma patients with intellectual disabilities were prescribed antibiotics (69.9% vs. 54.5%). COPD patients with intellectual disabilities, compared with matched controls without intellectual disabilities, received significantly more often either no COPD-related practice consultation at all (respectively 20.8% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.004) or a large number of practice consultations (>31 consultations, respectively 16.7% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.004). For asthma, there was no statistical difference between patients with or without intellectual disabilities regarding the number and type of consultations. The asthma year point prevalence in patients with intellectual disabilities was, from 2014 onward, significantly higher, and in 2019 was 8.7% vs. 6.0% for people without intellectual disabilities. For COPD, it was comparable in both groups. Both asthma and COPD patients with intellectual disabilities appeared considerably younger in age than patients without intellectual disabilities. Our findings warrant further research into the causes of the differences found for asthma and COPD and whether they also infer differences in the quality or the effectiveness of GP disease management, especially for young adults with intellectual disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141458418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The FRESHAIR4Life study: Global implementation research on non-communicable disease prevention targeting adolescents' exposure to tobacco and air pollution in disadvantaged populations. FRESHAIR4Life 研究:针对弱势人群中青少年接触烟草和空气污染的非传染性疾病预防的全球实施研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00367-w
Charlotte M Hoffman, Anke Versluis, Sergiu Chirila, Bruce J Kirenga, Amina Khan, Saima Saeed, Talant Sooronbaev, Ioanna Tsiligianni, D K Arvind, Linda C Bauld, Floor A van den Brand, Niels H Chavannes, Hilary Pinnock, Pippa D Powell, Jurjen van der Schans, Kamran Siddiqi, Siân Williams, M J J Rianne van der Kleij

The FRESHAIR4Life study aims to reduce the non-communicable disease (NCD) burden by implementing preventive interventions targeting adolescents' exposure to tobacco use and air pollution (AP) worldwide. This paper presents the FRESHAIR4Life methodology and initial rapid review results. The rapid review, using various databases and PubMed, aimed to guide decision-making on risk factor focus, target areas, and populations. It showed variable NCD mortality rates related to tobacco use and AP across the participating countries, with tobacco as the main risk factor in the Kyrgyz Republic, Greece, and Romania, and AP prevailing in Pakistan and Uganda. Adolescent exposure levels, sources, and correlates varied. The study will continue with an in-depth situational analysis to guide the selection, adaptation, and integration of evidence-based interventions into the FRESHAIR4Life prevention package. This package will be implemented, evaluated, assessed for cost-effectiveness, and iteratively refined. The research places a strong emphasis on co-creation, capacity building, and comprehensive communication and dissemination.

FRESHAIR4Life 研究旨在通过在全球范围内实施针对青少年烟草使用和空气污染(AP)暴露的预防干预措施来减轻非传染性疾病(NCD)负担。本文介绍了 FRESHAIR4Life 的研究方法和初步快速审查结果。快速审查使用了各种数据库和 PubMed,旨在指导有关风险因素重点、目标领域和人群的决策。结果表明,在参与国家中,与烟草使用和青少年吸烟有关的非传染性疾病死亡率各不相同,在吉尔吉斯共和国、希腊和罗马尼亚,烟草是主要的风险因素,而在巴基斯坦和乌干达,青少年吸烟则是主要的风险因素。青少年接触烟草的程度、来源和相关因素各不相同。研究将继续进行深入的情景分析,以指导选择、调整循证干预措施,并将其纳入 FRESHAIR4Life 预防一揽子计划。将对这套干预措施进行实施、评估和成本效益评价,并不断改进。这项研究非常重视共同创造、能力建设以及全面的交流和传播。
{"title":"The FRESHAIR4Life study: Global implementation research on non-communicable disease prevention targeting adolescents' exposure to tobacco and air pollution in disadvantaged populations.","authors":"Charlotte M Hoffman, Anke Versluis, Sergiu Chirila, Bruce J Kirenga, Amina Khan, Saima Saeed, Talant Sooronbaev, Ioanna Tsiligianni, D K Arvind, Linda C Bauld, Floor A van den Brand, Niels H Chavannes, Hilary Pinnock, Pippa D Powell, Jurjen van der Schans, Kamran Siddiqi, Siân Williams, M J J Rianne van der Kleij","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00367-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00367-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FRESHAIR4Life study aims to reduce the non-communicable disease (NCD) burden by implementing preventive interventions targeting adolescents' exposure to tobacco use and air pollution (AP) worldwide. This paper presents the FRESHAIR4Life methodology and initial rapid review results. The rapid review, using various databases and PubMed, aimed to guide decision-making on risk factor focus, target areas, and populations. It showed variable NCD mortality rates related to tobacco use and AP across the participating countries, with tobacco as the main risk factor in the Kyrgyz Republic, Greece, and Romania, and AP prevailing in Pakistan and Uganda. Adolescent exposure levels, sources, and correlates varied. The study will continue with an in-depth situational analysis to guide the selection, adaptation, and integration of evidence-based interventions into the FRESHAIR4Life prevention package. This package will be implemented, evaluated, assessed for cost-effectiveness, and iteratively refined. The research places a strong emphasis on co-creation, capacity building, and comprehensive communication and dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141246780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Usability and feasibility of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit in daily clinical practice: The BANANA study. 吸入器依从性测试(TAI)工具包在日常临床实践中的可用性和可行性:BANANA 研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00372-z
Maria Achterbosch, Susanne J van de Hei, Boudewijn J H Dierick, Janwillem W H Kocks, Maarten van den Berge, Huib A M Kerstjens, Sandra Been-Buck, Titia Klemmeier, Liset van Dijk, Job F M van Boven

The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit links an adherence measurement instrument (the TAI) to proven effective interventions for different causes of non-adherence to inhaled medication. This study aimed to assess the usability and feasibility of the TAI Toolkit in clinical practice. The TAI Toolkit was piloted in eight primary and secondary care settings. Each study site included 10 patients with asthma and/or COPD and suspected non-adherence. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) recorded clinical data and TAI Toolkit outcomes. Data on usability and feasibility were collected in semi-structured interviews and with the System Usability Score (SUS). Of the included patients, 81% were non-adherent, and sporadic non-adherence was the most common (69%). The TAI Toolkit was valued with a mean SUS-score of 85.9 by the HCPs. They found the toolkit to 'be visually attractive', 'easy-to-use' and 'give insight into patients' adherence', thereby offering good potential for its use in clinical practice.

吸入器依从性测试(TAI)工具包将依从性测量工具(TAI)与针对导致不依从吸入药物的不同原因的已证实有效的干预措施联系起来。本研究旨在评估 TAI 工具包在临床实践中的可用性和可行性。TAI工具包在八个初级和二级医疗机构进行了试点。每个研究地点包括 10 名哮喘和/或慢性阻塞性肺病患者和疑似不依从患者。医护人员(HCPs)记录了临床数据和TAI工具包的结果。通过半结构化访谈和系统可用性评分(SUS)收集了有关可用性和可行性的数据。在纳入的患者中,81%未坚持治疗,其中最常见的是零星不坚持治疗(69%)。主治医生对 TAI 工具包的平均 SUS 评分为 85.9 分。他们认为该工具包 "具有视觉吸引力"、"易于使用 "并 "能够深入了解患者的依从性",因此在临床实践中具有很好的应用潜力。
{"title":"Usability and feasibility of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit in daily clinical practice: The BANANA study.","authors":"Maria Achterbosch, Susanne J van de Hei, Boudewijn J H Dierick, Janwillem W H Kocks, Maarten van den Berge, Huib A M Kerstjens, Sandra Been-Buck, Titia Klemmeier, Liset van Dijk, Job F M van Boven","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00372-z","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00372-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit links an adherence measurement instrument (the TAI) to proven effective interventions for different causes of non-adherence to inhaled medication. This study aimed to assess the usability and feasibility of the TAI Toolkit in clinical practice. The TAI Toolkit was piloted in eight primary and secondary care settings. Each study site included 10 patients with asthma and/or COPD and suspected non-adherence. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) recorded clinical data and TAI Toolkit outcomes. Data on usability and feasibility were collected in semi-structured interviews and with the System Usability Score (SUS). Of the included patients, 81% were non-adherent, and sporadic non-adherence was the most common (69%). The TAI Toolkit was valued with a mean SUS-score of 85.9 by the HCPs. They found the toolkit to 'be visually attractive', 'easy-to-use' and 'give insight into patients' adherence', thereby offering good potential for its use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11133447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and gastrointestinal diseases: a systematic review and Meta-analysis 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征与胃肠道疾病的关系:系统回顾与 Meta 分析
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00373-y
Liubin Cao, Chengpei Zhou, Rupei Zhang, Shan Zhou, Xiaolei Sun, Jun Yan
{"title":"Relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and gastrointestinal diseases: a systematic review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Liubin Cao, Chengpei Zhou, Rupei Zhang, Shan Zhou, Xiaolei Sun, Jun Yan","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00373-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00373-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141098214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tobacco control policies and respiratory conditions among children presenting in primary care. 烟草控制政策与基层医疗机构就诊儿童的呼吸系统疾病。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00369-8
Timor Faber, Luc E Coffeng, Aziz Sheikh, Irwin K Reiss, Johan P Mackenbach, Jasper V Been

Tobacco control policies can protect child health. We hypothesised that the parallel introduction in 2008 of smoke-free restaurants and bars in the Netherlands, a tobacco tax increase and mass media campaign, would be associated with decreases in childhood wheezing/asthma, respiratory tract infections (RTIs), and otitis media with effusion (OME) presenting in primary care. We conducted an interrupted time series study using electronic medical records from the Dutch Integrated Primary Care Information database (2000-2016). We estimated step and slope changes in the incidence of each outcome with negative binomial regression analyses, adjusting for underlying time-trends, seasonality, age, sex, electronic medical record system, urbanisation, and social deprivation. Analysing 1,295,124 person-years among children aged 0-12 years, we found positive step changes immediately after the policies (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14 for wheezing/asthma; IRR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.13-1.19 for RTIs; and IRR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.36 for OME). These were followed by slope decreases for wheezing/asthma (IRR: 0.95/year, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97) and RTIs (IRR: 0.97/year, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98), but a slope increase in OME (IRR: 1.05/year, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09). We found no clear evidence of benefit of changes in tobacco control policies in the Netherlands for the outcomes of interest. Our findings need to be interpreted with caution due to substantial uncertainty in the pre-legislation outcome trends.

烟草控制政策可以保护儿童健康。我们假设,2008 年荷兰同时推出的无烟餐厅和酒吧、烟草税上调和大众媒体宣传活动将与儿童喘息/哮喘、呼吸道感染 (RTI) 和中耳炎伴流脓 (OME) 在初级保健中的发病率下降有关。我们利用荷兰综合初级保健信息数据库(2000-2016 年)中的电子病历进行了一项间断时间序列研究。我们通过负二叉回归分析估计了每种结果发病率的阶跃和斜率变化,并对潜在的时间趋势、季节性、年龄、性别、电子病历系统、城市化和社会贫困程度进行了调整。在对 1,295,124 人年的 0-12 岁儿童进行分析后,我们发现政策实施后立即出现了正阶跃变化(发病率比 (IRR):1.07,95% CI:1.07):喘息/哮喘:1.07,95% CI:1.01-1.14;RTIs:1.16,95% CI:1.13-1.19;OME:1.24,95% CI:1.14-1.36)。随后,喘息/哮喘(IRR:0.95/年,95% CI:0.93-0.97)和 RTIs(IRR:0.97/年,95% CI:0.96-0.98)的斜率下降,但 OME 的斜率上升(IRR:1.05/年,95% CI:1.01-1.09)。我们没有发现明确的证据表明荷兰烟草控制政策的改变对相关结果有益。由于立法前的结果趋势存在很大的不确定性,因此需要谨慎解释我们的研究结果。
{"title":"Tobacco control policies and respiratory conditions among children presenting in primary care.","authors":"Timor Faber, Luc E Coffeng, Aziz Sheikh, Irwin K Reiss, Johan P Mackenbach, Jasper V Been","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00369-8","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00369-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tobacco control policies can protect child health. We hypothesised that the parallel introduction in 2008 of smoke-free restaurants and bars in the Netherlands, a tobacco tax increase and mass media campaign, would be associated with decreases in childhood wheezing/asthma, respiratory tract infections (RTIs), and otitis media with effusion (OME) presenting in primary care. We conducted an interrupted time series study using electronic medical records from the Dutch Integrated Primary Care Information database (2000-2016). We estimated step and slope changes in the incidence of each outcome with negative binomial regression analyses, adjusting for underlying time-trends, seasonality, age, sex, electronic medical record system, urbanisation, and social deprivation. Analysing 1,295,124 person-years among children aged 0-12 years, we found positive step changes immediately after the policies (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14 for wheezing/asthma; IRR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.13-1.19 for RTIs; and IRR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.36 for OME). These were followed by slope decreases for wheezing/asthma (IRR: 0.95/year, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97) and RTIs (IRR: 0.97/year, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98), but a slope increase in OME (IRR: 1.05/year, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09). We found no clear evidence of benefit of changes in tobacco control policies in the Netherlands for the outcomes of interest. Our findings need to be interpreted with caution due to substantial uncertainty in the pre-legislation outcome trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140956681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmaceutical treatment status of patients with COPD in the community based on medical Internet of Things: a real-world study. 基于医疗物联网的社区慢性阻塞性肺病患者药物治疗状况:一项真实世界研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00371-0
Peng Wu, Yi-Qun Jiang, Feng-Li Si, Huan-Ying Wang, Xiao-Bo Song, Chun-Feng Sheng, Xun Xu, Fan Li, Jing Zhang

This study aimed to investigate the real-world standardisation and adherence of medical treatment regimens in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the community for making future management strategy. The follow-up data and treatment information of patients with COPD, which were collected through the Management Information Center of COPD (MICCOPD) in 21 community health service centres in Songjiang District, a countryside region of Shanghai. Concordance between the pharmaceutical treatment plan and recommendation of 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report during the follow-up management period, as well as the medication adherence by patients,were analysed. Out of the 2044 patients diagnosed with COPD, 814 patients (39.8%) who had an initial record of medication use were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The most common medication regimens were long-acting beta-agonist plus inhaled corticosteroids (35.9%) and oral bronchodilators (41.9%). Among these 814 patients, 45.7%, 38.0%, 31.6% and 14.6% adhered to the treatment after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. The concordance rate with the regimens recommended by the 2017 GOLD guidelines was 35.5% at baseline, 35.5% at 6 months, 32.7% at 12 months, 35.4% at 18 months and 37% at 24 months. The compliance and guideline consistency rates of patients with COPD in the community under the management of general practitioners need to be improved. Enhancing general practitioner proficiency in the prevention and management of COPD and increasing patient awareness of the condition, are crucial standardising and improving adherence to initial and follow-up COPD treatments.

本研究旨在调查社区慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在现实世界中的规范化治疗和治疗方案的依从性,以制定未来的管理策略。研究通过慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理信息中心收集了上海市松江区21家社区卫生服务中心的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随访数据和治疗信息。分析了随访管理期间的药物治疗方案与2017年全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议(GOLD)报告建议的一致性,以及患者的用药依从性。在2044名确诊为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者中,有814名患者(39.8%)的初始用药记录符合纳入标准。最常见的用药方案是长效β-受体激动剂加吸入皮质类固醇(35.9%)和口服支气管扩张剂(41.9%)。在这 814 名患者中,分别有 45.7%、38.0%、31.6% 和 14.6% 的患者在随访 6、12、18 和 24 个月后坚持治疗。与2017年GOLD指南推荐方案的一致性率分别为:基线35.5%,6个月35.5%,12个月32.7%,18个月35.4%,24个月37%。在全科医生的管理下,社区慢性阻塞性肺病患者的依从性和指南一致性率有待提高。提高全科医生在慢性阻塞性肺病预防和管理方面的能力,增强患者对慢性阻塞性肺病的认识,对于规范和改善慢性阻塞性肺病初始治疗和后续治疗的依从性至关重要。
{"title":"Pharmaceutical treatment status of patients with COPD in the community based on medical Internet of Things: a real-world study.","authors":"Peng Wu, Yi-Qun Jiang, Feng-Li Si, Huan-Ying Wang, Xiao-Bo Song, Chun-Feng Sheng, Xun Xu, Fan Li, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00371-0","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00371-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the real-world standardisation and adherence of medical treatment regimens in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the community for making future management strategy. The follow-up data and treatment information of patients with COPD, which were collected through the Management Information Center of COPD (MICCOPD) in 21 community health service centres in Songjiang District, a countryside region of Shanghai. Concordance between the pharmaceutical treatment plan and recommendation of 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report during the follow-up management period, as well as the medication adherence by patients,were analysed. Out of the 2044 patients diagnosed with COPD, 814 patients (39.8%) who had an initial record of medication use were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The most common medication regimens were long-acting beta-agonist plus inhaled corticosteroids (35.9%) and oral bronchodilators (41.9%). Among these 814 patients, 45.7%, 38.0%, 31.6% and 14.6% adhered to the treatment after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. The concordance rate with the regimens recommended by the 2017 GOLD guidelines was 35.5% at baseline, 35.5% at 6 months, 32.7% at 12 months, 35.4% at 18 months and 37% at 24 months. The compliance and guideline consistency rates of patients with COPD in the community under the management of general practitioners need to be improved. Enhancing general practitioner proficiency in the prevention and management of COPD and increasing patient awareness of the condition, are crucial standardising and improving adherence to initial and follow-up COPD treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11087570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140904792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of C-reactive protein rapid testing and communication skills training on antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. A cluster factorial randomised controlled trial. C反应蛋白快速检测和沟通技巧培训对急性咳嗽抗生素处方的影响。分组随机对照试验。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00368-9
Carl Llor, Marta Trapero-Bertran, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Ramon Monfà, Rosa Abellana, Ana García-Sangenís, Ana Moragas, Rosa Morros

This cluster randomised clinical trial carried out in 20 primary care centres in Barcelona was aimed at assessing the effect of a continuous intervention focused on C-reactive protein (CRP) rapid testing and training in enhanced communication skills (ECS) on antibiotic consumption for adults with acute cough due to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The interventions consisted of general practitioners and nurses' use of CRP point-of-care and training in ECS separately and combined, and usual care. The primary outcomes were antibiotic consumption and variation of the quality-adjusted life years during a 6-week follow-up. The difference in the overall antibiotic prescribing between the winter seasons before and after the intervention was calculated. The sample size calculated could not be reached due to the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 233 patients were recruited. Compared to the usual care group (56.7%) antibiotic consumption among patients assigned to professionals in the ECS group was significantly lower (33.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.94, p = 0.037), whereas patients assigned to CRP consumed 43.8% of antibiotics (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.29-1.68, p = 0.429) and 38.4% in the combined intervention group (aOR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.17-1.21; p = 0.112). The overall antibiotic prescribing rates in the centres receiving training were lower after the intervention compared to those assigned to usual care, with significant reductions in β-lactam rates. Patient recovery was similar in all groups. Despite the limited power due to the low number of patients included, we observed that continuous training achieved reductions in antibiotic consumption.

这项分组随机临床试验在巴塞罗那的 20 个初级保健中心进行,旨在评估以 C 反应蛋白(CRP)快速检测和加强沟通技巧(ECS)培训为重点的持续干预措施对因下呼吸道感染(LRTI)引起急性咳嗽的成人使用抗生素的影响。干预措施包括全科医生和护士分别或联合使用 CRP 护理点和 ECS 培训,以及常规护理。主要结果是抗生素消耗量以及在6周随访期间质量调整生命年的变化。计算了干预前后冬季抗生素处方总量的差异。由于 COVID-19 的爆发,无法达到计算的样本量。共招募了 233 名患者。与常规护理组(56.7%)相比,分配给 ECS 组专业人员的患者的抗生素消耗量显著降低(33.9%,调整后的几率比 [aOR] 0.38,95% CI 0.15-0.94,P = 0.037),而分配给 CRP 的患者消耗了 43.8% 的抗生素(aOR 0.70,95% CI 0.29-1.68,p = 0.429),在联合干预组中消耗了 38.4% 的抗生素(aOR 0.45,95% CI,0.17-1.21;p = 0.112)。与接受常规护理的中心相比,接受培训的中心在干预后的总体抗生素处方率更低,其中β-内酰胺类药物的处方率显著降低。各组患者的康复情况相似。尽管由于纳入的患者人数较少,研究的有效性有限,但我们观察到,持续的培训减少了抗生素的消耗量。
{"title":"Effects of C-reactive protein rapid testing and communication skills training on antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. A cluster factorial randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Carl Llor, Marta Trapero-Bertran, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Ramon Monfà, Rosa Abellana, Ana García-Sangenís, Ana Moragas, Rosa Morros","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00368-9","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00368-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cluster randomised clinical trial carried out in 20 primary care centres in Barcelona was aimed at assessing the effect of a continuous intervention focused on C-reactive protein (CRP) rapid testing and training in enhanced communication skills (ECS) on antibiotic consumption for adults with acute cough due to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The interventions consisted of general practitioners and nurses' use of CRP point-of-care and training in ECS separately and combined, and usual care. The primary outcomes were antibiotic consumption and variation of the quality-adjusted life years during a 6-week follow-up. The difference in the overall antibiotic prescribing between the winter seasons before and after the intervention was calculated. The sample size calculated could not be reached due to the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 233 patients were recruited. Compared to the usual care group (56.7%) antibiotic consumption among patients assigned to professionals in the ECS group was significantly lower (33.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.94, p = 0.037), whereas patients assigned to CRP consumed 43.8% of antibiotics (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.29-1.68, p = 0.429) and 38.4% in the combined intervention group (aOR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.17-1.21; p = 0.112). The overall antibiotic prescribing rates in the centres receiving training were lower after the intervention compared to those assigned to usual care, with significant reductions in β-lactam rates. Patient recovery was similar in all groups. Despite the limited power due to the low number of patients included, we observed that continuous training achieved reductions in antibiotic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081949/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140899152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring burden of disease in both asthma and COPD by merging the ACQ and CCQ: less is more? 通过合并 ACQ 和 CCQ 测量哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病的疾病负担:少即是多?
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00364-z
Liz J. A. Cuperus, Cathelijne M. van Zelst, Huib A. M. Kerstjens, Rudi W. Hendriks, Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Molken, Jacqueline B. Muilwijk-Kroes, Gert-Jan Braunstahl, Johannes C. C. M. in ’t Veen

Symptoms of asthma and COPD often overlap, and both diseases can co-exist in one patient. The asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) were developed to assess disease burden in respectively asthma or COPD. This study explores the possibility of creating a new questionnaire to assess disease burden in all obstructive lung diseases by integrating and reducing questions of the ACQ and CCQ. Data of patients with asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) were collected from a primary and secondary care center. Patients completed ACQ and CCQ on the same day. Linear regression tested correlations. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for item reduction. The secondary cohort with asthma and COPD patients was used for initial question selection (development cohort). These results were reproduced in the primary care cohort and secondary cohort of patients with ACO. The development cohort comprised 252 patients with asthma and 96 with COPD. Correlation between ACQ and CCQ in asthma was R = 0.82, and in COPD R = 0.83. PCA determined a selection of 9 questions. Reproduction in primary care data (asthma n = 1110, COPD n = 1041, ACO = 355) and secondary care data of ACO patients (n = 53) resulted in similar correlations and PCA-derived selection of questions. In conclusion, PCA determined a selection of nine questions of the ACQ and CCQ: working title ‘the Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire’. These results suggest that this pragmatic set of questions might be sufficient to assess disease burden in obstructive lung disease in both primary as secondary care.

哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病的症状经常重叠,而且两种疾病可能同时存在于一名患者身上。哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床问卷(CCQ)分别用于评估哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疾病负担。本研究探讨了通过整合和减少 ACQ 和 CCQ 的问题来创建新问卷以评估所有阻塞性肺部疾病的疾病负担的可能性。研究人员从一家初级和二级医疗中心收集了哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠(ACO)患者的数据。患者在同一天填写 ACQ 和 CCQ。线性回归测试了相关性。主成分分析(PCA)用于减少项目。包含哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者的二级队列用于初始问题选择(开发队列)。这些结果在初级保健队列和 ACO 患者次级队列中得到了复制。开发队列包括 252 名哮喘患者和 96 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者。哮喘患者的 ACQ 与 CCQ 之间的相关性为 R = 0.82,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的相关性为 R = 0.83。PCA 确定了 9 个问题。在初级医疗数据(哮喘 n = 1110,慢性阻塞性肺病 n = 1041,ACO = 355)和 ACO 患者的二级医疗数据(n = 53)中再现时,相关性和 PCA 得出的问题选择结果相似。总之,PCA 确定了 ACQ 和 CCQ 的九个问题:工作标题为 "阻塞性肺病问卷"。这些结果表明,这组实用的问题可能足以评估基层和二级医疗机构中阻塞性肺病的疾病负担。
{"title":"Measuring burden of disease in both asthma and COPD by merging the ACQ and CCQ: less is more?","authors":"Liz J. A. Cuperus, Cathelijne M. van Zelst, Huib A. M. Kerstjens, Rudi W. Hendriks, Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Molken, Jacqueline B. Muilwijk-Kroes, Gert-Jan Braunstahl, Johannes C. C. M. in ’t Veen","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00364-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00364-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Symptoms of asthma and COPD often overlap, and both diseases can co-exist in one patient. The asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) were developed to assess disease burden in respectively asthma or COPD. This study explores the possibility of creating a new questionnaire to assess disease burden in all obstructive lung diseases by integrating and reducing questions of the ACQ and CCQ. Data of patients with asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) were collected from a primary and secondary care center. Patients completed ACQ and CCQ on the same day. Linear regression tested correlations. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for item reduction. The secondary cohort with asthma and COPD patients was used for initial question selection (development cohort). These results were reproduced in the primary care cohort and secondary cohort of patients with ACO. The development cohort comprised 252 patients with asthma and 96 with COPD. Correlation between ACQ and CCQ in asthma was R = 0.82, and in COPD R = 0.83. PCA determined a selection of 9 questions. Reproduction in primary care data (asthma <i>n</i> = 1110, COPD <i>n</i> = 1041, ACO = 355) and secondary care data of ACO patients (<i>n</i> = 53) resulted in similar correlations and PCA-derived selection of questions. In conclusion, PCA determined a selection of nine questions of the ACQ and CCQ: working title ‘the Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire’. These results suggest that this pragmatic set of questions might be sufficient to assess disease burden in obstructive lung disease in both primary as secondary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140841363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced asthma biologics clinical pathway in the West Midlands UK 英国西米德兰兹郡哮喘生物制剂临床路径的混合方法评估
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y
Sarah Damery, Janet Jones, Elfatih Idris, Angela Cooper, Holly Minshall, Chris Clowes, Kate Jolly

Biologic treatments can alleviate severe asthma symptoms and reduce health service use. However, service capacity limits and low referral rates from primary care indicate unmet patient need. We report a mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced severe asthma pathway implemented in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, UK which aimed to optimise primary care referrals through training/education, and increased capacity in specialist clinics. Quantitative analysis assessed patient wait times between pathway stages, prescribing changes, exacerbations, hospital admissions and asthma control. Interviews with 12 stakeholders evaluated perceptions of the enhanced pathway across settings. In 12 months, 564 patients from 28 general practices were reviewed for biologics eligibility, of whom 125 (22.2%) were referred for specialist assessment. Wait times were significantly lower under the enhanced pathway when compared against historic patients following the standard pathway, and reduced overall from a mean of 76.4 to 26.7 weeks between referral and biologics initiation (p < 0.001). Patients commencing biologics (n = 46) showed significantly reduced reliever inhaler prescribing rates (p = 0.037), 60% lower oral steroid use (p < 0.001), significantly reduced exacerbation rates (p < 0.001) and fewer hospital admissions (p < 0.001) compared with the 12 months pre-treatment. Mean asthma control scores reduced from 3.13 pre-initiation to 1.89 post-initiation (p < 0.001) – a clinically significant improvement. Interviewees viewed the enhanced pathway positively, although ongoing issues related to difficulties engaging primary care amid concerns around increased workloads and pathway capacity. The large number of referrals generated from a comparatively small number of general practices confirms substantial unmet need that an enhanced severe asthma pathway could help address if implemented routinely.

生物治疗可以缓解严重的哮喘症状,减少医疗服务的使用。然而,服务能力的限制和基层医疗机构的低转诊率表明患者的需求尚未得到满足。我们报告了对英国斯塔福德郡和斯托克特伦特河畔实施的增强型重症哮喘治疗路径的混合方法评估,该路径旨在通过培训/教育优化初级医疗转诊,并提高专科诊所的服务能力。定量分析评估了患者在路径阶段之间的等待时间、处方变化、病情恶化、入院和哮喘控制情况。对 12 位利益相关者进行了访谈,评估了他们对不同环境下强化路径的看法。在 12 个月内,对 28 家普通诊所的 564 名患者进行了生物制剂资格审查,其中 125 人(22.2%)被转至专科评估。与采用标准路径的历史患者相比,强化路径下的等待时间明显缩短,从转诊到开始使用生物制剂的平均时间从 76.4 周减少到 26.7 周(p < 0.001)。与治疗前的 12 个月相比,开始使用生物制剂的患者(n = 46)的缓解吸入器处方率明显降低(p = 0.037),口服类固醇用量减少 60%(p < 0.001),病情恶化率明显降低(p < 0.001),入院次数减少(p < 0.001)。哮喘控制评分的平均值从开始治疗前的 3.13 分降至开始治疗后的 1.89 分(p < 0.001),这是一项具有临床意义的改善。受访者对改进后的治疗路径持积极态度,但在工作量和治疗路径容量增加的情况下,仍存在与基层医疗机构接触困难有关的问题。从相对较少的全科医疗机构中产生的大量转诊证实了大量未得到满足的需求,如果常规实施强化的重症哮喘路径,将有助于解决这些问题。
{"title":"Mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced asthma biologics clinical pathway in the West Midlands UK","authors":"Sarah Damery, Janet Jones, Elfatih Idris, Angela Cooper, Holly Minshall, Chris Clowes, Kate Jolly","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biologic treatments can alleviate severe asthma symptoms and reduce health service use. However, service capacity limits and low referral rates from primary care indicate unmet patient need. We report a mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced severe asthma pathway implemented in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, UK which aimed to optimise primary care referrals through training/education, and increased capacity in specialist clinics. Quantitative analysis assessed patient wait times between pathway stages, prescribing changes, exacerbations, hospital admissions and asthma control. Interviews with 12 stakeholders evaluated perceptions of the enhanced pathway across settings. In 12 months, 564 patients from 28 general practices were reviewed for biologics eligibility, of whom 125 (22.2%) were referred for specialist assessment. Wait times were significantly lower under the enhanced pathway when compared against historic patients following the standard pathway, and reduced overall from a mean of 76.4 to 26.7 weeks between referral and biologics initiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients commencing biologics (<i>n</i> = 46) showed significantly reduced reliever inhaler prescribing rates (<i>p</i> = 0.037), 60% lower oral steroid use (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), significantly reduced exacerbation rates (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and fewer hospital admissions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with the 12 months pre-treatment. Mean asthma control scores reduced from 3.13 pre-initiation to 1.89 post-initiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) – a clinically significant improvement. Interviewees viewed the enhanced pathway positively, although ongoing issues related to difficulties engaging primary care amid concerns around increased workloads and pathway capacity. The large number of referrals generated from a comparatively small number of general practices confirms substantial unmet need that an enhanced severe asthma pathway could help address if implemented routinely.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140841103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1