Orthopaedic Surgery最新文献

Background: Lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) is a spinal disorder that often necessitates surgical intervention. However, evidence on the comparative clinical value of robot-assisted full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA FE-TLIF) versus conventional FE-TLIF in early-grade (Grades I and II) LS remains limited, leaving uncertainty about its true clinical value in this patient population. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of FE-TLIF with RA FE-TLIF in patients with Grade I and II LS.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 patients who underwent surgical treatment for LS between April 2022 and April 2023 at our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: 22 underwent RA FE-TLIF, and 25 underwent FE-TLIF. Key outcomes measured included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery time, fusion rate, screw placement accuracy, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the incidence of postoperative complications. Statistical analyses were performed using the independent-sample t test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

Results: The RA FE-TLIF group exhibited significantly shorter operative times and lower intraoperative blood loss compared to the FE-TLIF group (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery, as measured by hospital stay, was also shorter in the RA FE-TLIF group (p = 0.001). VAS and JOA scores indicated greater pain relief and functional improvement in the RA FE-TLIF group, with statistically significant differences observed at both 1 month and final follow-up (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the RA FE-TLIF group, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.144). Complete fusion rates were 95.45% in the RA FE-TLIF group and 88.00% in the FE-TLIF group, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Screw placement accuracy was higher in the RA FE-TLIF group (97.73%) than in the FE-TLIF group (89.00%), with a significant difference (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: RA FE-TLIF demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to FE-TLIF in the treatment of LS. These findings support the broader adoption of RA FE-TLIF as a preferred surgical technique for this condition.

Objective: Adult thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) impairs the quality of life. Traditional 3CO provides correction but carries a high risk of complications, especially in the elderly. Minimally invasive anterior approaches may be safer. This study aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of septuagenarians with thoracolumbar kyphosis treated with single-position navigated lateral column realignment with anterior longitudinal ligament release (LCR-A) plus posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), or percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) versus three-column osteotomy (3CO).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 21 patients with LCR-A and 54 with 3CO prospectively treated between March 2020 and April 2024. Radiographic parameters, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 scores, complications, and perioperative data were analyzed over a 2-year follow-up period.

Results: Although LCR-A patients were older, they had significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative times, and fewer fused levels than 3CO patients. LCR-A achieved comparable deformity correction, with fewer complications, lower postoperative ODI, and better SRS-22 scores. The LCR-A group maintained radiographic correction, with fewer new neurological deficits and lower rates of infection, ileus, and delirium.

Conclusions: Single-position navigated LCR-A is a safer and less invasive alternative to 3CO in elderly patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, offering effective deformity correction, fewer complications, improved functional outcomes, and enhanced recovery.

Level of evidence: IV.

Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent condition characterized by cartilage degeneration, tissue destruction, and bone hyperplasia, with pain being the primary symptom. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic unicompartmental KOA, focusing on realigning force vectors to redistribute mechanical stress and alleviate pain. This study aims to address the question of whether two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning methods yield different correction angles and distraction distances in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). By comparing these methodologies, we seek to evaluate their impact on surgical outcomes and patient prognosis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving patients diagnosed with unicompartmental medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who exhibited deviations in the mechanical axis of the lower limbs. These patients underwent OWHTO between January 2021 and August 2022. Both 3D and 2D preoperative planning procedures for OWHTO were employed, targeting an ideal alignment with the weight-bearing line (%WBL) set at 62.5%. The study quantitatively assessed the differences in correction angles and distraction distances associated with the two surgical planning methods using paired t-tests and non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: The study comprised a total of 102 patients. It was observed that the mean correction angle in the 2D approach was significantly greater than that recorded in the 3D approach (p < 0.001), with an average difference of 1.49° ± 1.70°. The medial opening gap differences for OWHTO between the two approaches measured 2.1 ± 2.06 mm.

Conclusions: To summarize, the 2D preoperative planning method for OWHTO necessitates a larger correction angle and a wider medial opening gap relative to the 3D planning approach when aiming for the same WBL. Therefore, it is crucial for surgeons to take into account the variances between 2D and 3D planning and to evaluate potential correction errors during the surgical procedure while strategizing for OWHTO.

To manage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, both remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and standard ACLR without remnant preservation are applied. This study aims to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of remnant-preserving versus standard ACLR techniques by analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify studies published from January 2000 to November 2024. Based on the PICOS framework, we systematically reviewed RCTs in which patients with ACL injuries compared ACLR with remnant preservation versus standard ACLR in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT1000/2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (SSD), synovial coverage, proprioception evaluation, cyclops lesion, and range of motion (ROM). Data were pooled using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model, based on the heterogeneity. The quality of the included literature was assessed based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2.0), and the GRADE criteria were applied to rate evidence quality for key outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15 were used for the statistical analyses. The relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous data, and the mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variable data. Both types of indicators were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was adopted to determine whether patients improved enough clinically to notice a difference. Subgroup analyses were conducted for outcomes failing to reach MCID thresholds in order to examine potential modifiers of different follow-up durations and remnant preservation techniques. A total of 10 studies were included in the qualitative review and meta-analysis. Although there were statistically significant differences between the remnant preservation group and the standard technique group in favor of the remnant preservation technique with respect to postoperative Lysholm score (MD 1.44; 95% CI, 0.60-2.29; I ² = 23%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Moderate), SSD (MD -0.57; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.15; I ² = 86%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Low) and proprioception recovery (MD -0.57; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.31; I ² = 0%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Low), these observed differences are so small that they are unlikely to be clinically relevant. No differences were found in other clinical outcomes between the two groups. The follow-up duration and remnant preservation techniques were not identified as the key factors influencing the differences between remnant preservation ACLR and standard ACLR. No clinically meaningful benefit in postoperative knee stability or function; remnant preservation may be considered primarily when technical feasibility is high and remnant quality is optimal. This is achieved without increasing the risk of cyclops lesions and deficiency of ROM.

Objective: Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy is a leading cause of nontraumatic shoulder pain, frequently leading to articular and functional impairments, depicting an adhesive capsulitis-like clinical presentation. To date, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of conservative approaches, and no gold standard has been established for managing rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. This systematic review aimed to identify the most effective conservative approach for reducing pain and improving function in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy patients.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception until January 2, 2025, for English-language randomized clinical trials including adults affected by rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy undergoing conservative treatment. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a customized data extraction form, with consensus reached by a third reviewer. A network meta-analysis was subsequently carried out to compare the efficacy of different interventions. The risk of bias within the included randomized clinical trials was assessed using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The study has been registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD420250650833.

Results: Nineteen articles were included. This study identified 1160 subjects affected by rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. A pairwise comparison through a network meta-analysis indicated that platelet-rich plasma exhibited the highest probability (85%) of improving shoulder function, followed by disodium ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid at 75%, aspiration techniques at 65%, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy at 57%. Regarding pain reduction, disodium ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid showed the highest probability (66%), followed by kinesiotaping and needle aspiration, both at 61%.

Conclusion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis identified several interventional techniques, including platelet-rich plasma and disodium ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid injections, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and needle aspiration, as more effective strategies for reducing pain and improving function in subjects affected by rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy.

Level of evidence: I (systematic review of Level-I randomized controlled studies).

Objective: Conversion to hip arthroplasty (cHA) is a widely utilized and effective surgical intervention for addressing the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures (FIF-INF). Although previous studies have confirmed that the failure rate of internal fixation is higher in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but whether the efficacy and complications of cHA after failure differ from those in stable fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications associated with hip arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the failure of internal fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hip arthroplasty subsequent to the failure of FIF-INF from December 2012 to December 2020 at various participating research centers. Cases demonstrating excellent and acceptable quality fracture reduction, as defined by the criteria established by Chang et al., were included. According to AO/OTA classification criteria of intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures were classified into stable fractures (31-A1) and unstable fractures (31-A2, A3). There were 47 patients with stable fractures and 56 patients with unstable fractures. Clinical and radiological evaluations were conducted for all patients. This study employed independent samples t-tests, χ ² tests or Fisher's exact test, and both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results: A total of 103 patients were analyzed. The HHS in the stable group improved from a preoperative mean of 47.08 ± 5.50 to 89.13 ± 4.75 at the final follow-up, whereas that in the unstable group increased from 45.43 ± 6.36 to 83.87 ± 4.67. The improvement scores for the stable and unstable groups were 42.05 ± 4.69 and 38.81 ± 3.06, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). VAS scores decreased from the preoperative levels of 7.13 ± 0.92 and 7.61 ± 0.82 to 2.36 ± 0.87 and 2.91 ± 0.79, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in pain in both groups; however, the unstable group reported more severe postoperative pain (p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications following cHA was significantly greater in the unstable group (28.57%) than in the stable group (10.64%) (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: cHA is an effective treatment modality for the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Compared with stable fractures, patients with initial unstable fractures that have failed experience a greater incidence of postoperative complications, relatively poorer joint function, and more pronounced pain following cHA.

Objective: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion technology may have a protective effect on the paravertebral and spinal ligaments during surgery, resulting in positive effects on bone mineral density (BMD). However, evidence is lacking on the change in vertebral bone density of patients. The changes in bone density in patients after lumbar fusion surgery are closely related to the occurrence of mechanical complications such as proximal border kyphosis, screw extraction, and adjacent vertebral fractures. Therefore, the aim is to investigate the changes in the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the adjacent vertebral cancellous bone and endplate at the fusion level in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

Methods: The medical records of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent LLIF surgery in our hospital from March 2018 to October 2021 were retrospectively examined. The volumetric BMD of the cancellous bone and endplate adjacent to the lumbar fusion segment was measured before the operation and during postoperative follow-up. The measured volumetric BMD included the level of the upper/lower instrumented vertebra and the endplate (UIV + 1; LIV + 1; UIV + 1e; and LIV + 1e). Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, Fisher exact test, univariable, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were executed in this study.

Results: A total of 32 patients were included in the study, including 27 women and 5 men, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 7.1 years. The preoperative vBMD values in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups were greater than those at the postoperative follow-up (131.9 ± 34.8 vs. 115.8 ± 30.8; 134.8 ± 37.0 vs. 117.2 ± 32.1, p < 0.001; 312.9 ± 79.3 vs. 287.7 ± 85.2, p = 0.007; 314.7 ± 71.4 vs. 296.1 ± 59.8, p = 0.042). The vBMD changes and rates of change in the cancellous and endplate regions were 16.1% ± 17.7% (11.4% ± 13.0%), 12.2% ± 12.1% (17.3% ± 17.5%), 11.4% ± 18.3% (-25.2% ± 49.2%), and 7.2% ± 18.5% (-18.6% ± 49.8%) in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the preoperative vBMD, postoperative vBMD, or percent vBMD change between UIV + 1 and LIV + 1. However, there was a significant difference in the endplate vBMD at follow-up (p = 0.035).

Conclusion: We evaluated the changes of vBMD of the cancellous bone and endplates adjacent to the vertebral body, cephalad or caudal to the fused level in LLIF patients through QCT, and can provide a new approach for reducing the occurrence of mechanically related complications after vertebral fusion surgery.

Background: High dislocation due to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), classified as Crowe type III or IV, presents significant challenges in total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in preventing nerve complications while restoring leg length.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary THA using an S-ROM-A modular stem with oblique subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in patients with high hip dislocation; to identify the advantages, limitations, and possible countermeasures of this surgical approach.

Patients and methods: Subjects were 45 hips (37 patients) with high hip dislocation (Crowe III/IV) treated by primary THA using an S-ROM-A stem, with femoral shortening osteotomy performed at our institution. Outcomes 3 years after surgery were examined in 100% of the subjects. Postoperative complications and functional and radiographic outcomes were investigated.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 65 years and the mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 10.7 ± 3.4 years. There were no cases of postoperative infection, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or neurological complications in the legs. Early postoperative dislocation occurred in two hips (4%, resolved conservatively) and osteotomy site nonunion in one hip (2%). Repeat surgery was required in only this case of nonunion (2%). The hip function score was significantly improved postoperatively. Leg lengthening after surgery was 0-56 mm (mean, 28 mm). Examination of radiographs revealed that it took 12 weeks for bone union at the osteotomy site in all hips except for the one hip with nonunion. No stem subsidence was found postoperatively, and "fixation by bone ingrowth" was achieved at the final follow-up examination in all hips (100%), including the one that required repeat surgery.

Conclusion: THA using an S-ROM-A modular stem with oblique subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy provided favorable mid-term outcomes in patients with Crowe III/IV DDH. No neurological complications occurred, and functional and radiographic improvements were substantial. Our method, which emphasizes intraoperative sciatic nerve palpation for individualized leg lengthening, may serve as a practical and safe alternative to more complex monitoring systems. Further research incorporating objective intraoperative monitoring may help standardize this approach.

Lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by a complex etiology. Despite significant advancements in management strategies, it continues to pose considerable challenges. Critical anatomic risk factors previously identified include trochlear dysplasia (TD), patella alta, and elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, with TD being the most significant. A thorough risk assessment using predictive models is primarily recommended to assist in patient counseling and to identify high-risk cases, for whom early surgical intervention may be considered. Controversies persist regarding the indications for combined surgical procedures, including tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO), and lateral retinacular release (LRR) with medial patellofemoral reconstruction (MPFLR). Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that a deeper understanding of the interplay between anatomic factors may optimize surgical prioritization and improve clinical outcomes. The combined surgical approach should be reserved for meticulously selected cases with substantial anatomic risk factors, while isolated MPFLR may prove adequate for cases with milder grade risk factors. To enhance individualized treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with LPD, deeper insights into the interaction of anatomical factors, supported by higher-quality clinical research and advancements in biomechanical modeling, are essential.