Orthopaedic Surgery最新文献

Objective: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has been increasing annually. However, clinical surgeons have overlooked the impaction fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle in patients with ACL ruptures. The purpose of the present study was to report the detection rate of the posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in patients with ACL ruptures, and to evaluate the functional outcomes of patients following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) without treatment of the tibial fractures at a 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Methods: Four hundred eighty-eight patients treated for ACL ruptures between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and the posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures were classified based on MRI assessment. The detection rate of the posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures was calculated, and the functional outcomes (SF-12 Mental Component Summaries, SF-12 Physical Component Summaries, Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS) were evaluated at a 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Results: The detection rate of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures was 41.6% among ACL ruptures. Of these, 285 cases (58.4%) had no fractures, 98 cases (20.1%) had type I impaction fractures, 41 cases (8.4%) had type IIA impaction fractures, 15 cases (3.1%) had type IIB impaction fractures, 22 cases (4.5%) had type IIIA impaction fractures, and 27 cases (5.5%) had type IIIB impaction fractures. Patients with type IIIA or IIIB impaction fractures showed an increased detection rate of contact mechanism compared to the other subgroups. Significant differences in Tegner (postoperation) and KOOS (QOL) were found between no fracture and type IIIB impaction fractures in patients following ACLR.

Conclusions: The detection rate of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in patients with ACL ruptures was high. Patients with type IIIB impaction fractures following ACLR had poor functional outcomes.

Objectives: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides incomplete information about bone strength. There are few data on the relationship between osteoporosis-related examinations and bone strength. The objective of the present study was to determine which osteoporosis-related examinations best predicted trabecular bone strength, and to enhance a formula for predicting bone strength on the basis of bone density examination.

Methods: This observational study included postmenopausal women (aged over 50 years) who underwent unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgery in the lumbar spine between September 2021 and June 2023. The pressure within each balloon expansion circle was extracted to reflect the true bone strength. The NHANES 2013-2014 data were used to assess the performance of the formula. The performance of the formula was compared with that of the observed actual fractures. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the formula and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score.

Results: A total of 40 postmenopausal women (mean age ± standard deviation, 70.90 years ± 10.30) were enrolled. The average balloon pressure was 59.23 psi (± 12.40, means ± SDs). The mean BMD of total lumbar spine (average of L1-L4) was 0.89 g/cm² ± 0.20 (mean ± standard), and the Pearson correlation coefficient between lumbar BMD and bone strength was 0.516. After adjusting for age and BMI, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%. Calibration plots of the observed actual fractures versus those estimated via the bone strength formula were considered good fits. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference between the formula and the FRAX score in predicting fracture risk.

Conclusions: After adjustment, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%, indicating a strong correlation. In addition, Bone Strength = DXA × 27 - Age × 0.585-BMI × 0.887 + 98.

Objective: Pear-shaped disc could increase the risk of intraoperative end-plate injury, which may lead to postoperative sclerotic Modic Changes (MCs). However, there are no studies on the relationship between pear-shaped disc and postoperative sclerotic MCs. Therefore, this study investigates the risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specifically, the study focuses on the impact of pear-shaped disc on the occurrence of postoperative sclerotic MCs and evaluates its influence on clinical outcomes.

Methods: A total of 411 patients undergoing TLIF between January 2018 and January 2022 were included. Among them, 50 developed postoperative sclerotic MCs, while 361 did not. The two groups were matched based on various parameters. Clinical and radiographic evaluations, including visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar X-ray, CT, and MRI, were performed. Statistical analysis included independent sample t test, Pearson's chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results: After pairing, a total of 100 patients were included, including 50 patients in postoperative sclerotic MCs group and 50 patients in non-MCs group. There were 27 pear-shaped discs in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group, significantly higher than 7 in the non-MCs group (p < 0.001). Besides, BMI, endplate injury, and cage subsidence in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in the non-MCs group, but the fusion rate was significantly lower than that in the non-MCs group. The postoperative and follow-up SL and surgical corrections of SL in postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in non-MCs group. The independent risk factors identified for postoperative sclerotic MCs include pear-shaped disc and higher BMI.

Conclusion: Pear-shaped disc and higher body mass index (BMI) as independent risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs. Patients with sclerotic MCs exhibited a lower fusion rate, increased cage subsidence, and poorer symptom improvement compared to those without MCs.

The traditional posterior median approach laminectomy is widely used for lumbar decompression. However, the bilateral dissection of paraspinal muscles during this procedure often leads to postoperative muscle atrophy, chronic low back pain, and other complications. The posterior midline spinous process-splitting approach (SPSA) offers a significant advantage over the traditional approach by minimizing damage to the paraspinal muscles. SPSA reduces the incidence of muscle atrophy and chronic low back pain while maintaining the integrity of the posterior spinal structures. The technique involves longitudinal splitting of the spinous process, which allows for adequate access to the lamina for decompression without detaching the paraspinal muscles. As a result, it provides a clearer surgical field and facilitates muscle preservation, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications. Additionally, SPSA requires only standard surgical instruments, making it accessible in most surgical settings. This paper reviews the anatomical considerations, surgical techniques, and clinical applications of the SPSA, highlighting its effectiveness in reducing muscle atrophy and improving recovery outcomes. The paper also discusses its potential in treating conditions such as lumbar spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for future research to establish the long-term benefits of SPSA and refine surgical techniques. The results suggest that SPSA is a promising alternative to traditional approaches, with better outcomes in terms of muscle preservation and overall recovery.

Objective: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique-trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes.

Method: A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty-one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent-sample t test and paired t-test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann-Whitney U test were used for categorical data.

Results: The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the fluoroscopy frequency in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). In both TDA group and PPSF group, postoperative back and leg pain and the JOA score were significantly improved (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the pre- and postoperative VAS score for back and leg pain and the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, intervertebral fusion rate, and complications rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate.

Background: Reliable scientific information is crucial for assessing hip function and evaluating the success of hip surgery. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is the most widely used tool for measuring hip function and, in particular, the outcomes of hip surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the HHS for hip replacement treatment groups and to test whether there was a substantial difference between reporting only the postoperative HHS or the HHS difference (HHSdiff).

Methods: PubMed, CNKI, and Epistemonikos were searched until March 1, 2024. The risk of bias, level of evidence, and publication bias were assessed. As HHS is a continuous outcome, mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a common-effect/random-effects model. The same approach was used for both postoperative HHS and HHSdiff. The effect of the two treatment groups studied (minimally invasive vs. conventional approach) on postoperative HHS was then compared with the effect of the two groups studied on the difference in HHS.

Results: A total of 41 RCTs, involving 3572 patients, with a low to high risk of bias and a low to moderate publication bias were included. The measured outcome parameters showed a low to moderate level of evidence. There was no relevant difference in the reporting of HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs, measured at 0-0.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: The present study showed that there is no relevant difference between reporting of the HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs. Both methods of HHS reporting produced comparable results in an identical cohort of 3765 patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

Objective: Lamina-implantation is gradually becoming the main surgical method for the treatment of intraspinal tumors. Traditional titanium (Ti) internal fixation not only produces artifacts, which affects the observation of tumors and dural sac closure, but also faces the problem of secondary surgical removal. In this study, absorbable material were used in lamina replantation for the first time and was evaluated for its efficacy and safety.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent short-segment lamina replantation for intraspinal tumors in our center from February 2020 to November 2022. After condition matching of the number of fixation segment and fixation position, the baseline information, complications, neurological function, quality of life, spinal mobility and bone healing rate of the absorbable group and the Ti group were compared. Fisher exact, Chi-square, or rank sum test were used for categorical variables, and t-test was used for continuous variables to distinguish differences between groups.

Results: Cerebrospinal fluid leak was the most common complication, with no difference between the two groups (12.9% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.366). The bone healing rates of the two groups at 3 months after surgery were 77.4% and 87.1%, respectively, and there was no significant difference (p = 0.508). At 1 year after surgery, the resorbable group showedlower levels of anxiety/depression (1.20 ± 0.41 vs. 1.61 ± 0.61, p = 0.050), however, it did not affect the overall quality of life of the patients at 1 year.

Conclusion: Both titanium and absorbable internal fixation have shown good clinical results in the treatment of intraspinal tumors by laminareplantation. Regardless of cost, absorbable screws and plates are also suitable options for patients undergoing lamina replantation, because it has no stress shielding effect and does not require secondary removal. In addition, there are no artifacts in the image, which is more conducive to observing the recurrence of the tumor and the closure of the dural sac.

Purpose: Infection after fracture fixation (IAFF) is a severe complication. There are few multicenter studies targeting IAFF. This paper identifies independent risk factors associated with IAFF by analyzing multicenter clinical data. Appropriate interventions should be implemented to reduce the risk of IAFF.

Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. This study screened medical records of patients who underwent internal fixation for fractures at participating medical institutions from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. Data extraction included demographic characteristics, disease features, surgical variables, and laboratory indicators. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the relationship between relevant risk factors and IAFF. Research data were sourced from the hospital's electronic medical record system and self-constructed databases.

Results: In our study, 202 patients who underwent internal fixation for fractures experienced postoperative infections, which corresponds to an overall incidence rate of approximately 1.7%. The predominant pathogen identified in these infections was Staphylococcus aureus. A multifactorial analysis indicated that several factors were independently associated with the occurrence of IAFF. These factors included BMI ranges of 24.0-27.9 and 28.0-31.9, smoking, a high ASA score, high-energy trauma, diabetes, open fracture, seasonal timing of the surgery (summer), bone grafting, drainage duration, surgical duration ≥ 180 min, and A/G ratio < 1.2.

Conclusions: We strongly recommend that orthopedic surgeons perform comprehensive preoperative assessments on fracture patients to identify factors that may increase the risk of infection. Through the implementation of targeted interventions and beneficial modifications to these modifiable risk factors, it is possible to lower the incidence of IAFF. Additionally, proactive screening, risk stratification, and thorough patient education should be prioritized for patients with high risk but nonmodifiable factors.

Objective: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a debilitating rheumatic condition that significantly impairs mobility and quality of life through chronic inflammation and spinal fusion. The aim of this study is to investigate the optimal sequencing of spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) as treatment options, a topic that remains a subject of debate among medical professionals.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study spanning from 2017 to 2021, we assessed adult patients with AS who underwent both spinal osteotomy and THR, outcome measures involved radiographic assessments like Global Cobb angle, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS), as well as clinical metrics such as the Harris hip score. For the same surgical group, paired t-tests were performed for pre- and postoperative data, while independent sample t-tests were used for comparing different surgical groups. The study aims to elucidate the optimal sequencing of these surgical procedures based on these comprehensive metrics.

Results: Among the 14 patients included, demographic and clinical variables were comparable between the two procedural groups. At the 3-month follow-up, all major metrics showed significant postoperative improvements. Specifically, the Global Cobb angle reduced from 98.88 ± 38.54 to 54.48 ± 18.14 (p = 0.018), and the Harris hip scores, evaluated at the 3-month follow-up, dramatically increased from 15.14 ± 10.12 to 72.57 ± 14.12 (p = 0.001). Furthermore, the Spine First Group exhibited more pronounced changes in pelvic parameters (p = 0.009), albeit at the expense of longer operation times and increased blood loss. No major complications were encountered.

Conclusions: Contrary to the prevalent belief that spinal osteotomy should precede THR, our study argues that under certain conditions, opting for hip surgery first can be both viable and advantageous. This approach may mitigate the risk of complications and even facilitate subsequent spinal surgery. Surgical decisions must be highly tailored, focusing on patient-specific needs and anatomical considerations. The ultimate goal remains consistent: to improve patients' functional abilities in daily activities and thereby enhance their overall quality of life.

Background: Flatfoot is a common foot disorder involving progressive foot deformity of the three-dimensional structures of the forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot. Currently, Chinese surgeons and patients favor subtalar arthroereisis (SA) due to its minimally invasive and low-damage characteristics. HyProCure device is widely used. However, there is limited analysis of large sample sizes. This study utilized statistical evaluation with a large sample size to analyze clinical characteristics trends of SA for flatfoot, including baseline indicators, selection of HyProCure size and surgical strategy, complications, and implant removal. This study will enhance the understanding of SA in China.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 732 patients (1008 ft) who underwent SA from June 2015 to June 2023, with 509 pediatric and adolescent patients (772 ft) and 223 adult patients (236 ft). Based on the patient's age, patients aged ≤ 18 were included in the children and adolescent group, while adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) patients aged > 18 were included in the adult group. General data was collected, including patient sex, age, side, body mass index (BMI), surgery date, HyproCure size, and surgical data, and trends were analyzed. Postoperative complications and HyProCure removal were collected as outcome measures during follow-up.

Results: The age of patients treated with SA was gradually getting younger, with male patients predominating, mainly concentrated in the 11-14 age group. HyProCure 7 has the highest usage rate. In the children and adolescent group, 288 ft (37.31%) only underwent SA. In the adult group, 18 ft (7.63%) only underwent SA. Complications include sinus tarsi pain, peroneal spasms, achilles tendon tension, and muscle strength decline. The complication rate in the children and adolescent group was 5.05%, while in the adult group it was 28.81%. Overall, it was 10.62%. The removal rate of HyProCure in the children and adolescent group is 1.04%, in the adult group is 15.25%, and overall is 4.37%.

Conclusions: The trend in flatfoot treated with SA was towards children and adolescent male patients, and sinus tarsi pain was the most common complication after SA. The complication rate and removal rate in the children and adolescent group were lower than those in the adult group. HyProCure can be removed without additional adverse effects.