Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2587606
Bo Jiang, Tingting Zhao, Min Liu, Chunsheng Shi, Na Shu
Purpose: This study examined global, regional, and national trends in early-onset cataract (EOC) burden from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and socio-demographic index (SDI).
Methods: Using Global Burden of Disease 2021 data, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for EOC were analyzed via Joinpoint regression to assess temporal trends.
Results: Global EOC cases surged from 5,999,808 (1990) to 10,831,058 (2021), with DALYs rising from 596,529 to 855,633. Age-standardized prevalence per 100,000 increased from 249.62 to 287.33 (AAPC = 0.461%, p < 0.001). Burden escalated with age and was consistently higher in females. Low-middle SDI regions had the highest age-standardized prevalence (416.43) and DALY rates (83.52) in 2021. Etiological shifts occurred: DALYs from air pollution declined (33.40% to 29.57%) and smoking decreased (11.68% to 9.00%), while metabolic risks like high fasting glucose (12.16% to 15.01%) and elevated BMI (12.01% to 16.05%) grew significantly.
Conclusions: EOC burden has risen markedly since 1990, driven by aging populations, female sex, metabolic risks, and socioeconomic disparities. Low-middle SDI regions face disproportionate impacts. Prioritizing prevention strategies targeting modifiable risks (air pollution, smoking, obesity, hyperglycemia) and ensuring equitable healthcare access are critical to mitigating this public health challenge.
{"title":"Global, Regional, and National Burden of Early-Onset Cataract from 1990 to 2021: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.","authors":"Bo Jiang, Tingting Zhao, Min Liu, Chunsheng Shi, Na Shu","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2587606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2587606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined global, regional, and national trends in early-onset cataract (EOC) burden from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and socio-demographic index (SDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Global Burden of Disease 2021 data, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for EOC were analyzed via Joinpoint regression to assess temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Global EOC cases surged from 5,999,808 (1990) to 10,831,058 (2021), with DALYs rising from 596,529 to 855,633. Age-standardized prevalence per 100,000 increased from 249.62 to 287.33 (AAPC = 0.461%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Burden escalated with age and was consistently higher in females. Low-middle SDI regions had the highest age-standardized prevalence (416.43) and DALY rates (83.52) in 2021. Etiological shifts occurred: DALYs from air pollution declined (33.40% to 29.57%) and smoking decreased (11.68% to 9.00%), while metabolic risks like high fasting glucose (12.16% to 15.01%) and elevated BMI (12.01% to 16.05%) grew significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EOC burden has risen markedly since 1990, driven by aging populations, female sex, metabolic risks, and socioeconomic disparities. Low-middle SDI regions face disproportionate impacts. Prioritizing prevention strategies targeting modifiable risks (air pollution, smoking, obesity, hyperglycemia) and ensuring equitable healthcare access are critical to mitigating this public health challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145637036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2587607
Wan Ting Loke, Samantha Min Er Yew, Zhi Wei Lim, Blanche Xiaohong Lim, Charmaine Chai, Victor Teck Chang Koh, David Ziyou Chen, Yih-Chung Tham
Purpose: With the growing aging population, cataract surgeries are becoming increasingly common, placing significant pressure on hospital eye services to manage postoperative care. Co-management between ophthalmologists and optometrists offers a potential solution to enhance efficiency and care quality. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of co-management models between ophthalmologists and optometrists for post-cataract surgery patients in different countries.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and bibliographies, up to November 26, 2024. Search terms included "shared care scheme" and "post-operative cataract surgery". Papers involving optometrists in post-cataract surgery monitoring and reporting related management outcomes were included.
Results: The ten selected studies, conducted in the United States of America (USA), England, Scotland, Ireland, and the Netherlands, showed that post-cataract co-management is feasible and safe. The results demonstrated uncompromised patient safety, positive patient satisfaction outcomes, and optometrist competency. Successful implementation was dependent on clear referrals and workflow guidelines, rigorous optometrists training, strong ophthalmologists and optometrists collaboration, and regular patients feedback. However, study heterogeneity and limited geographic scope hindered comparability and generalisability of the findings to other countries with different healthcare systems and optometric training levels.
Conclusion: Co-management of post-cataract surgery patients between ophthalmologists and optometrists has demonstrated feasibility and patient safety in some countries. However, tailoring the guidelines and adapting models to each country's specific demands and capabilities is essential for a successful implementation. Further research is needed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of such models in different countries and healthcare systems.
目的:随着人口老龄化的加剧,白内障手术越来越普遍,给医院眼科部门带来了巨大的术后护理压力。眼科医生和验光师之间的共同管理提供了一个潜在的解决方案,以提高效率和护理质量。本研究评估了不同国家眼科和验光师对白内障术后患者联合管理模式的可行性和安全性。方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和参考书目,截止到2024年11月26日。搜索词包括“共享护理计划”和“白内障术后手术”。纳入了涉及验光师在白内障术后监测和报告相关管理结果的论文。结果:在美国、英格兰、苏格兰、爱尔兰和荷兰进行的10项精选研究表明,白内障术后联合治疗是可行和安全的。结果显示,没有妥协的患者安全,积极的患者满意度结果,和验光师的能力。成功的实施取决于明确的转诊和工作流程指南、严格的验光师培训、眼科医生和验光师的紧密合作以及定期的患者反馈。然而,研究的异质性和有限的地理范围阻碍了研究结果在具有不同医疗体系和验光培训水平的其他国家的可比性和普遍性。结论:在一些国家,眼科医生和验光师共同管理白内障术后患者已被证明是可行和安全的。然而,根据每个国家的具体需求和能力调整指导方针和模式对于成功实施至关重要。需要进一步的研究来探索这些模型在不同国家和医疗系统中的可行性和有效性。
{"title":"Co-Management of Post-Cataract Surgery Patients Between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Wan Ting Loke, Samantha Min Er Yew, Zhi Wei Lim, Blanche Xiaohong Lim, Charmaine Chai, Victor Teck Chang Koh, David Ziyou Chen, Yih-Chung Tham","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2587607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2587607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the growing aging population, cataract surgeries are becoming increasingly common, placing significant pressure on hospital eye services to manage postoperative care. Co-management between ophthalmologists and optometrists offers a potential solution to enhance efficiency and care quality. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of co-management models between ophthalmologists and optometrists for post-cataract surgery patients in different countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and bibliographies, up to November 26, 2024. Search terms included \"shared care scheme\" and \"post-operative cataract surgery\". Papers involving optometrists in post-cataract surgery monitoring and reporting related management outcomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ten selected studies, conducted in the United States of America (USA), England, Scotland, Ireland, and the Netherlands, showed that post-cataract co-management is feasible and safe. The results demonstrated uncompromised patient safety, positive patient satisfaction outcomes, and optometrist competency. Successful implementation was dependent on clear referrals and workflow guidelines, rigorous optometrists training, strong ophthalmologists and optometrists collaboration, and regular patients feedback. However, study heterogeneity and limited geographic scope hindered comparability and generalisability of the findings to other countries with different healthcare systems and optometric training levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-management of post-cataract surgery patients between ophthalmologists and optometrists has demonstrated feasibility and patient safety in some countries. However, tailoring the guidelines and adapting models to each country's specific demands and capabilities is essential for a successful implementation. Further research is needed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of such models in different countries and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145637043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2587599
Lisa A Hark, Paula Anne Newman-Casey, Prakash Gorroochurn, Saloni Sapru, Desiree R Torres, Stefania C Maruri, Suzanne Winter, Simani Price, Christopher Girkin, Thomas A Swain, Gerald McGwin, George A Cioffi, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Jason D Horowitz, Lindsay A Rhodes, Cynthia Owsley
Purpose: To report eye disease detection referral rates for in-office eye care across the Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and eye Health through Telemedicine (SIGHT) Studies conducted in Alabama (AL-SIGHT), Michigan (MI-SIGHT), and New York City (NYC-SIGHT).
Methods: Individuals age ≥40 years who completed eye health screenings in federally qualified health centers, a free clinic, and affordable housing developments were included in the analysis. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and fundus photography were conducted across all sites and detection of eye diseases and referral rates are reported. Two-sample t-test and chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between those referred and not referred.
Results: Of the 838 participants screened in AL-SIGHT, 2970 in MI-SIGHT, and 708 in NYC-SIGHT, referral rates for in-office eye care were 47.3%, 42.8%, and 66.1% respectively. Detection rates of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect in AL-SIGHT were 18.6%, MI-SIGHT were 24%, and NYC-SIGHT were 26.7%. Among those referred there were significantly more participants who identified as Black race, had high school or less education, were single/divorced/separated/widowed, retired or unable to work/disabled, insured with Medicare, or reported having diabetes, hypertension, or glaucoma (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The SIGHT Studies provide evidence that reaching underserved individuals at high-risk for eye diseases and providing telehealth-based eye health screenings in trusted community-based settings, led to high rates of eye disease detection and referral for in-office eye care.
{"title":"Detection of Eye Diseases and Referral Rates for In-Office Eye Care Across Three SIGHT Studies.","authors":"Lisa A Hark, Paula Anne Newman-Casey, Prakash Gorroochurn, Saloni Sapru, Desiree R Torres, Stefania C Maruri, Suzanne Winter, Simani Price, Christopher Girkin, Thomas A Swain, Gerald McGwin, George A Cioffi, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Jason D Horowitz, Lindsay A Rhodes, Cynthia Owsley","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2587599","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2587599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report eye disease detection referral rates for in-office eye care across the Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and eye Health through Telemedicine (SIGHT) Studies conducted in Alabama (AL-SIGHT), Michigan (MI-SIGHT), and New York City (NYC-SIGHT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals age ≥40 years who completed eye health screenings in federally qualified health centers, a free clinic, and affordable housing developments were included in the analysis. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and fundus photography were conducted across all sites and detection of eye diseases and referral rates are reported. Two-sample t-test and chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between those referred and not referred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 838 participants screened in AL-SIGHT, 2970 in MI-SIGHT, and 708 in NYC-SIGHT, referral rates for in-office eye care were 47.3%, 42.8%, and 66.1% respectively. Detection rates of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect in AL-SIGHT were 18.6%, MI-SIGHT were 24%, and NYC-SIGHT were 26.7%. Among those referred there were significantly more participants who identified as Black race, had high school or less education, were single/divorced/separated/widowed, retired or unable to work/disabled, insured with Medicare, or reported having diabetes, hypertension, or glaucoma (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SIGHT Studies provide evidence that reaching underserved individuals at high-risk for eye diseases and providing telehealth-based eye health screenings in trusted community-based settings, led to high rates of eye disease detection and referral for in-office eye care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12687133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145605448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To investigate the key features of electronic device use in the AACE (acute acquired concomitant esotropia) population and compare them with those in normal and other strabismus populations, while further exploring the pathogenesis of AACE.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted on patients admitted to the strabismus department of our hospital from March 2023 to March 2024. The cohort comprised 48 acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) patients, 55 intermittent exotropia (IXT) patients, and 48 healthy controls. Their refractive status and strabismus histories were documented. Additionally, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using a questionnaire on electronic device usage to identify the risk factors for AACE.
Results: Regardless of adjustments, patients in the AACE group used digital devices for 7.74 ± 4.33 hours per day, significantly longer than those in the IXT and normal groups (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that long-term use of electronic devices was a risk factor for AACE (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09,1.49; p < 0.001). Among the 48 patients with AACE, 29 (63.04%) engaged in near-vision tasks without refractive correction, which was significantly higher than in the other two groups, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.005).
Conclusion: Prolonged and excessive use of electronics serves as a risk factor for acute acquired concomitant esotropia. This finding provides valuable information for clinicians on how to prevent AACE in daily life, such as minimizing electronic device use and wearing prescription glasses when engaging in near-vision tasks.
目的:探讨急性获得性共同性内斜视(AACE)人群电子设备使用的主要特征,并与正常及其他斜视人群进行比较,进一步探讨AACE的发病机制。方法:对2023年3月至2024年3月在我院斜视科住院的患者进行病例对照研究。该队列包括48例急性获得性共同性内斜视(AACE)患者,55例间歇性外斜视(IXT)患者和48例健康对照。记录他们的屈光状态和斜视病史。此外,使用电子设备使用问卷进行多元逻辑回归分析,以确定AACE的危险因素。结果:无论如何调整,AACE组患者每天使用数字设备的时间为7.74±4.33小时,明显长于IXT组和正常组(p p p = 0.005)。结论:长时间过度使用电子产品是急性后天性内斜视的危险因素。这一发现为临床医生在日常生活中如何预防AACE提供了有价值的信息,例如在从事近视力任务时尽量减少电子设备的使用和戴处方眼镜。
{"title":"Unhealthy Overuse of Electronic Devices is a Risk Factor for Acute Acquired Concomitant Esotropia: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Zihui Deng, Zhuozhang Tan, Yuye Zhang, Shuyang Guo, Ling Ling, Xiying Wang, Chen Zhao, Wen Wen","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2587601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2587601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the key features of electronic device use in the AACE (acute acquired concomitant esotropia) population and compare them with those in normal and other strabismus populations, while further exploring the pathogenesis of AACE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was conducted on patients admitted to the strabismus department of our hospital from March 2023 to March 2024. The cohort comprised 48 acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) patients, 55 intermittent exotropia (IXT) patients, and 48 healthy controls. Their refractive status and strabismus histories were documented. Additionally, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using a questionnaire on electronic device usage to identify the risk factors for AACE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of adjustments, patients in the AACE group used digital devices for 7.74 ± 4.33 hours per day, significantly longer than those in the IXT and normal groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that long-term use of electronic devices was a risk factor for AACE (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09,1.49; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among the 48 patients with AACE, 29 (63.04%) engaged in near-vision tasks without refractive correction, which was significantly higher than in the other two groups, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged and excessive use of electronics serves as a risk factor for acute acquired concomitant esotropia. This finding provides valuable information for clinicians on how to prevent AACE in daily life, such as minimizing electronic device use and wearing prescription glasses when engaging in near-vision tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145541669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2580682
María José Fernández Fidalgo, Victoria D Ferigo Ferrel, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Yanxian Chen, Zhuoting Zhu, Fernando J Fernández-Velázquez
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in combination with orthokeratology (OK) for controlling myopia in Spanish children.
Methods: A single-site, randomized, parallel-group, single-blinded clinical trial. Twenty-six children aged 8-15 years with myopia between -0.75 to -6.75 D were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the RLRL combined with OK (RCO) group (n = 11) or the OK-only group (n = 15). The OK group wore OK lenses for at least 8 hours per night, while the RCO group received additional daily RLRL therapy, administered twice daily for 3 minutes per session five days per week. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, with compliance and safety monitoring. The primary outcome measure was axial length (AL) change.
Results: All 26 children completed the 6-month follow-up visit. After 6 months, the adjusted mean AL change was -0.057 mm (95% CI, -0.078 to -0.037 mm) in RCO group, and 0.041 mm (95% CI, 0.029 to 0.054 mm) in OK group. In RCO group, 5 children (45.5%) achieved clinically significant axial shortening (defined as AL change ≤ -0.05 mm). The adjusted mean macular thickness change was 0.664 µm (95% CI, 0.468 to 0.859 µm) in RCO group, and 0.077 µm (95% CI, -0.048 to 0.203 µm) in OK group. No severe adverse events or significant corneal findings were observed.
Conclusions: The six-month interim analysis indicates that combining RLRL therapy with OK effectively controls myopia progression in Spanish children, with no severe adverse effects. Long-term follow-up is ongoing.
{"title":"Six-Month Interim Analyses of the Efficacy of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy Combined with Orthokeratology for Myopia Control in Spanish Children.","authors":"María José Fernández Fidalgo, Victoria D Ferigo Ferrel, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Yanxian Chen, Zhuoting Zhu, Fernando J Fernández-Velázquez","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2580682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2580682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in combination with orthokeratology (OK) for controlling myopia in Spanish children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-site, randomized, parallel-group, single-blinded clinical trial. Twenty-six children aged 8-15 years with myopia between -0.75 to -6.75 D were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the RLRL combined with OK (RCO) group (<i>n</i> = 11) or the OK-only group (<i>n</i> = 15). The OK group wore OK lenses for at least 8 hours per night, while the RCO group received additional daily RLRL therapy, administered twice daily for 3 minutes per session five days per week. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, with compliance and safety monitoring. The primary outcome measure was axial length (AL) change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 26 children completed the 6-month follow-up visit. After 6 months, the adjusted mean AL change was -0.057 mm (95% CI, -0.078 to -0.037 mm) in RCO group, and 0.041 mm (95% CI, 0.029 to 0.054 mm) in OK group. In RCO group, 5 children (45.5%) achieved clinically significant axial shortening (defined as AL change ≤ -0.05 mm). The adjusted mean macular thickness change was 0.664 µm (95% CI, 0.468 to 0.859 µm) in RCO group, and 0.077 µm (95% CI, -0.048 to 0.203 µm) in OK group. No severe adverse events or significant corneal findings were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The six-month interim analysis indicates that combining RLRL therapy with OK effectively controls myopia progression in Spanish children, with no severe adverse effects. Long-term follow-up is ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145409703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-26DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2580766
Gui-Shuang Ying
{"title":"The Global Burden of Blindness and Visual Impairment: Progress and Challenges.","authors":"Gui-Shuang Ying","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2580766","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2580766","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-02-05DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2457620
Ahmed Elghzali, Vinay Swami, M D Hossain, Garrett Jones, J Tyler Babek, Christian Hemmerich, Haley Howard, Seraphim Himes, Jennifer Cox, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diversity and representation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients in clinical trials conducted in the United States from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023.
Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on May 28th, 2024 using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify relevant clinical trials. Inclusion criteria included trials published between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023, focusing on interventions for DR that were conducted in the United States. Screening and data extraction were independently performed by three reviewers.
Results: Eleven clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for participant representation based on sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Sex representation was rated as good in 9 of the 11 studies. However, age representation was rarely reported (only 1/11 studies) and race/ethnicity representation was poor in 6 of the 11 studies. The findings highlight significant underrepresentation of Asian and Black populations.
Conclusion: This study reveals substantial disparities in the demographic representation within DR clinical trials in the United States, emphasizing the critical need for improved inclusion strategies. Enhancing diversity in these trials is essential for producing research findings that are more applicable to the broader population affected by DR, ultimately contributing to more equitable healthcare outcomes and advancing the effectiveness of treatments across diverse demographic groups.
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Diversity and Representation in Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Trials in the U.S.","authors":"Ahmed Elghzali, Vinay Swami, M D Hossain, Garrett Jones, J Tyler Babek, Christian Hemmerich, Haley Howard, Seraphim Himes, Jennifer Cox, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2457620","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2457620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diversity and representation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients in clinical trials conducted in the United States from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on May 28th, 2024 using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify relevant clinical trials. Inclusion criteria included trials published between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023, focusing on interventions for DR that were conducted in the United States. Screening and data extraction were independently performed by three reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for participant representation based on sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Sex representation was rated as good in 9 of the 11 studies. However, age representation was rarely reported (only 1/11 studies) and race/ethnicity representation was poor in 6 of the 11 studies. The findings highlight significant underrepresentation of Asian and Black populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals substantial disparities in the demographic representation within DR clinical trials in the United States, emphasizing the critical need for improved inclusion strategies. Enhancing diversity in these trials is essential for producing research findings that are more applicable to the broader population affected by DR, ultimately contributing to more equitable healthcare outcomes and advancing the effectiveness of treatments across diverse demographic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"465-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2442367
Israel Ojalvo, Nikki Mehran, James Sharpe, Qiang Zhang, Jonathan S Myers, Reza Razeghinejad, Daniel Lee, Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer
Purpose: To identify factors that are associated with no-shows and cancellations in a glaucoma clinic.
Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients seen at a glaucoma clinic over a two-year period (6/2017-5/2019). Demographics and clinic information were recorded from the electronic medical record. A total of 36,810 visits from 7,383 patients were studied. Weather data was collected from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Distance analysis was calculated utilizing Bing Maps application programming interface (API) on Microsoft Excel. Visits were divided into three groups based on appointment status: kept, cancelled, and no-show.
Results: Bivariate analysis found a statistically significant difference in various factors amongst patients based on appointment status. Patients <15 miles from clinic had a higher rate of no-show, but a lower rate of cancellations compared to those farther (p < 0.0001) Using multivariable logistic regression, the following factors were associated with the likelihood of patient cancellation: average snowfall (Odds Ratio = 1.37); presence of storm event (OR = 1.12), new visit (OR = 1.82), follow-up appointments (OR = 1.90), and travel distance > 15 miles (OR = 1.11). The following factors were associated with patient no-show: resident clinic (OR = 1.79), new visit (OR = 2.24), follow-up appointments (OR = 2.18), age (OR = 0.99), average snowfall (OR = 1.27), presence of storm event (OR = 1.41), average windspeed (OR = 0.98), and travel distance > 15 miles (OR = 0.67).
Conclusion: Patient age, gender, travel distance, appointment type, and weather were all significantly associated with rates of patient cancellations and no-shows. These risk factors could lead to interventions to improve appointment adherence and patient retention. Weather is an under-analyzed factor in patient follow-up rates that warrants further investigation.
{"title":"Weather Patterns, Patient, and Appointment Characteristics Associated with Cancellations and No-Shows in a Glaucoma Clinic.","authors":"Israel Ojalvo, Nikki Mehran, James Sharpe, Qiang Zhang, Jonathan S Myers, Reza Razeghinejad, Daniel Lee, Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2442367","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2442367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify factors that are associated with no-shows and cancellations in a glaucoma clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study of patients seen at a glaucoma clinic over a two-year period (6/2017-5/2019). Demographics and clinic information were recorded from the electronic medical record. A total of 36,810 visits from 7,383 patients were studied. Weather data was collected from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Distance analysis was calculated utilizing Bing Maps application programming interface (API) on Microsoft Excel. Visits were divided into three groups based on appointment status: kept, cancelled, and no-show.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bivariate analysis found a statistically significant difference in various factors amongst patients based on appointment status. Patients <15 miles from clinic had a higher rate of no-show, but a lower rate of cancellations compared to those farther (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) Using multivariable logistic regression, the following factors were associated with the likelihood of patient cancellation: average snowfall (Odds Ratio = 1.37); presence of storm event (OR = 1.12), new visit (OR = 1.82), follow-up appointments (OR = 1.90), and travel distance > 15 miles (OR = 1.11). The following factors were associated with patient no-show: resident clinic (OR = 1.79), new visit (OR = 2.24), follow-up appointments (OR = 2.18), age (OR = 0.99), average snowfall (OR = 1.27), presence of storm event (OR = 1.41), average windspeed (OR = 0.98), and travel distance > 15 miles (OR = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient age, gender, travel distance, appointment type, and weather were all significantly associated with rates of patient cancellations and no-shows. These risk factors could lead to interventions to improve appointment adherence and patient retention. Weather is an under-analyzed factor in patient follow-up rates that warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"543-552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-02-04DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2457623
Jia-Yan Kai, Xing-Xuan Dong, Yi-Fan Miao, Dan-Lin Li, Andrzej Grzybowski, Carla Lanca, Zeng-Liang Ruan, Chen-Wei Pan
Purpose: Previous studies have assessed the impact of air pollution on myopia from the individual level, while none of them have explored the role of air pollution in visual health disparities between different regions from the area level. This ecological study aimed to investigate the impact of ambient air pollution on reduced visual acuity (VA).
Methods: The data were derived from the Chinese National Survey on Students' Constitution and Health (CNSSCH) conducted in 2014 and 2019, which involved 261,833 and 267,106 students respectively. The participants were 7-22 years old randomly selected from 30 mainland provinces in China. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models and fixed-effects panel regression models were used to explore the associations of provincial-level prevalence of reduced VA with air quality index (AQI), fine particulate matter ;(PM2.5), PM10, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) concentrations.
Results: There were nearly linear positive dose-response relationships between AQI, air pollutant concentrations and the prevalence of reduced VA. After adjusting for covariates, an interquartile range increase in PM2.5 exposure was significantly associated with a 5.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-9.3%) increase in the prevalence of reduced VA, whereas no significant associations were observed between AQI, the other five pollutants and the prevalence of reduced VA.
Conclusion: Regions with more polluted air tend to have a higher prevalence of reduced VA. Exposure to PM2.5 might be an important risk factor for myopia among children and adolescents.
{"title":"Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Reduced Visual Acuity Among Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Jia-Yan Kai, Xing-Xuan Dong, Yi-Fan Miao, Dan-Lin Li, Andrzej Grzybowski, Carla Lanca, Zeng-Liang Ruan, Chen-Wei Pan","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2457623","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2457623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous studies have assessed the impact of air pollution on myopia from the individual level, while none of them have explored the role of air pollution in visual health disparities between different regions from the area level. This ecological study aimed to investigate the impact of ambient air pollution on reduced visual acuity (VA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were derived from the Chinese National Survey on Students' Constitution and Health (CNSSCH) conducted in 2014 and 2019, which involved 261,833 and 267,106 students respectively. The participants were 7-22 years old randomly selected from 30 mainland provinces in China. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models and fixed-effects panel regression models were used to explore the associations of provincial-level prevalence of reduced VA with air quality index (AQI), fine particulate matter ;(PM2.5), PM10, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were nearly linear positive dose-response relationships between AQI, air pollutant concentrations and the prevalence of reduced VA. After adjusting for covariates, an interquartile range increase in PM2.5 exposure was significantly associated with a 5.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-9.3%) increase in the prevalence of reduced VA, whereas no significant associations were observed between AQI, the other five pollutants and the prevalence of reduced VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regions with more polluted air tend to have a higher prevalence of reduced VA. Exposure to PM2.5 might be an important risk factor for myopia among children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"487-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143188786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}