首页 > 最新文献

Orthopedics最新文献

英文 中文
Increasing Substitutions in European Football Is Associated With Decreased Injury Rates Among Elite Athletes. 在欧洲足球中,越来越多的换人与精英运动员受伤率的下降有关。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250505-01
Ibraheem Qureshi, Ryne Jenkins, Robert Faccone, Glyn Hinnenkamp, Matthew Heffelfinger, Daniel Acampa, Charles Ruotolo

Background: In the 2019/2020 football season, an increase from three to five substitutions was implemented in European football to help players manage a congested match calendar following lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to determine injury rates before and after implementation of five substitutions. Secondary objectives included characteristics and duration of injury and associated risk factors.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of players injured while playing in the first division of the Spanish professional football league (La-Liga) during the 2017/2018, 2018/2019, 2022/2023, and 2023/2024 seasons were identified from an online database, Transfermarkt. Injury- and player-related characteristics, as well as game play before and after the implementation of five substitutions, were studied. Multivariate regression models were used to assess complications, adjusting for age, minutes played, and appearances.

Results: The overall incidence during the study period was 0.76 injuries per player-season. A total of 1,268 injuries were reported prior to the rule change with an incidence of 0.94 injuries per player-season compared to 711 reported injuries with an incidence of 0.57 injuries per player-season after. There were significantly decreased odds of multiple injuries (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% CI [0.56, 0.82]; P<0.001) and muscle injuries (OR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.59, 0.87]; P<0.001) after the increase in substitutions.

Conclusion: Implementation of five substitutions was associated with significantly decreased injury rates in LaLiga. Additionally, players had significantly lower odds of sustaining multiple injuries and muscle injuries. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):223-228.].

背景:在2019/2020足球赛季,欧洲足球的换人人数从3人增加到5人,以帮助球员管理因COVID-19大流行而封锁的繁忙比赛日程。在本研究中,我们旨在确定实施五次换人前后的损伤率。次要目标包括损伤的特征和持续时间以及相关的危险因素。材料和方法:通过在线数据库Transfermarkt对2017/2018、2018/2019、2022/2023和2023/2024赛季在西班牙职业足球联赛(西甲)一级联赛中受伤的球员进行回顾性分析。研究了与伤病和球员相关的特征,以及实施五次换人前后的比赛情况。多变量回归模型用于评估并发症,调整年龄、上场时间和外表。结果:研究期间的总发生率为0.76人/球员赛季。在规则改变之前,共有1268人受伤,每个球员赛季的受伤率为0.94人,而在规则改变之后,报告的受伤率为711人,每个球员赛季的受伤率为0.57人。多发伤的发生率显著降低(比值比[OR]: 0.68;95% ci [0.56, 0.82];ppg结论:在西甲联赛中,实施5次换人可以显著降低受伤率。此外,球员遭受多处受伤和肌肉损伤的几率也明显较低。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Increasing Substitutions in European Football Is Associated With Decreased Injury Rates Among Elite Athletes.","authors":"Ibraheem Qureshi, Ryne Jenkins, Robert Faccone, Glyn Hinnenkamp, Matthew Heffelfinger, Daniel Acampa, Charles Ruotolo","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250505-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250505-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the 2019/2020 football season, an increase from three to five substitutions was implemented in European football to help players manage a congested match calendar following lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to determine injury rates before and after implementation of five substitutions. Secondary objectives included characteristics and duration of injury and associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of players injured while playing in the first division of the Spanish professional football league (La-Liga) during the 2017/2018, 2018/2019, 2022/2023, and 2023/2024 seasons were identified from an online database, Transfermarkt. Injury- and player-related characteristics, as well as game play before and after the implementation of five substitutions, were studied. Multivariate regression models were used to assess complications, adjusting for age, minutes played, and appearances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence during the study period was 0.76 injuries per player-season. A total of 1,268 injuries were reported prior to the rule change with an incidence of 0.94 injuries per player-season compared to 711 reported injuries with an incidence of 0.57 injuries per player-season after. There were significantly decreased odds of multiple injuries (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% CI [0.56, 0.82]; <i>P</i><0.001) and muscle injuries (OR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.59, 0.87]; <i>P</i><0.001) after the increase in substitutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of five substitutions was associated with significantly decreased injury rates in LaLiga. Additionally, players had significantly lower odds of sustaining multiple injuries and muscle injuries. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):223-228.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144234730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variation in Technique Influences Surgical Cost in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty. 技术差异影响拇指手掌关节置换术的手术成本。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250606-02
Nicholas Reiners, Rebekah M Kleinsmith, Stephen A Doxey, Andrew Sibley, Jeffrey B Husband, Brian P Cunningham

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is common in the community. There are a variety of ways to perform CMC arthroplasty with the basic technique revolving around trapeziectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify key factors in the determination of cost of CMC arthroplasty and if procedure type affects cost.

Materials and methods: Patients from 2018 to 2022 from a single health care system who received primary CMC arthroplasty using ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI), simple suture suspensionplasty, or suture tape-based reconstruction techniques were identified. Surgical costs were determined using time-driven activity-based cost accounting.

Results: A total of 173 patients were included. The average age was 63.6 years and 70.5% (n=122) were women. The most common technique was suture suspensionplasty (n=142, 82.1%). The average surgical cost was $2,830.36±$619.41. Suture suspensionplasty had the shortest operative time, followed by LRTI, and lastly suture tape-based reconstruction (62.9±16.0, 70.7±19.6 and 102.7±16.6 minutes, respectively, P<0.001). Procedure type and anchor use predicted surgical costs (R2=0.85, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Suture suspensionplasty had the shortest operative time and had the lowest cost of CMC arthroplasty techniques. The use of an anchor was associated with increased cost. Surgeons should keep these cost drivers in mind as they develop treatment plans. Surgeons and organizations should collaborate to provide high-value and economically-responsible care. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):e177-e181.].

背景:拇指腕掌骨(CMC)关节炎在社区中很常见。以梯形切除术为基础的CMC关节成形术有多种方法。本研究的目的是确定决定CMC关节置换术成本的关键因素,以及手术类型是否影响成本。材料和方法:2018年至2022年,来自单一医疗保健系统的患者接受了使用韧带重建肌腱间置(LRTI)、简单缝合悬吊成形术或缝合带重建技术的初级CMC关节成形术。手术费用采用时间驱动的作业成本会计来确定。结果:共纳入173例患者。平均年龄为63.6岁,70.5% (n=122)为女性。最常见的方法是缝合悬吊成形术(n=142, 82.1%)。平均手术费用为2830.36±619.41美元。缝线悬吊成形术手术时间最短,其次为LRTI,最后为缝线带重建(62.9±16.0分钟,70.7±19.6分钟,102.7±16.6分钟),P2=0.85, p结论缝线悬吊成形术是CMC关节置换术中手术时间最短,成本最低的方法。锚的使用增加了成本。外科医生在制定治疗方案时应该考虑到这些成本驱动因素。外科医生和组织应该合作提供高价值和经济上负责任的护理。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Variation in Technique Influences Surgical Cost in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Nicholas Reiners, Rebekah M Kleinsmith, Stephen A Doxey, Andrew Sibley, Jeffrey B Husband, Brian P Cunningham","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250606-02","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250606-02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is common in the community. There are a variety of ways to perform CMC arthroplasty with the basic technique revolving around trapeziectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify key factors in the determination of cost of CMC arthroplasty and if procedure type affects cost.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients from 2018 to 2022 from a single health care system who received primary CMC arthroplasty using ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI), simple suture suspensionplasty, or suture tape-based reconstruction techniques were identified. Surgical costs were determined using time-driven activity-based cost accounting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included. The average age was 63.6 years and 70.5% (n=122) were women. The most common technique was suture suspensionplasty (n=142, 82.1%). The average surgical cost was $2,830.36±$619.41. Suture suspensionplasty had the shortest operative time, followed by LRTI, and lastly suture tape-based reconstruction (62.9±16.0, 70.7±19.6 and 102.7±16.6 minutes, respectively, <i>P</i><0.001). Procedure type and anchor use predicted surgical costs (R<sup>2</sup>=0.85, <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suture suspensionplasty had the shortest operative time and had the lowest cost of CMC arthroplasty techniques. The use of an anchor was associated with increased cost. Surgeons should keep these cost drivers in mind as they develop treatment plans. Surgeons and organizations should collaborate to provide high-value and economically-responsible care. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):e177-e181.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e177-e181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144554093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Industry and National Institutes of Health Funding for Orthopedic Surgery Research. 工业与国立卫生研究院骨科外科研究经费之比较。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250625-01
Mitchell K Ng, Pedro Rullan-Oliver, Matthew Magruder, Paul G Mastrokostas, Viktor E Krebs, Javad Parvizi, Michael A Mont, Nicolas S Piuzzi

Background: The aims of this study were to analyze trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for musculoskeletal (MSK) research from 2012 to 2021, compare private industry funding to NIH funding, determine the proportion of total MSK research funding from public versus private sources, and examine how private industry research and development (R&D) spending has evolved in relation to net sales.

Materials and methods: Public research funding from 2012 to 2021 was aggregated using NIH data for MSK conditions with >$10M in funding. Private R&D funding was obtained from the top five orthopedic companies by revenue and compared to net sales to calculate R&D as a percentage of total sales. Annually reported financial statements from Securities Exchange Commission filings were used. Private funding was summed annually and compared to National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases spending using descriptive statistics.

Results: Annual research funding from the top five orthopedic companies is 10.0 times that of the NIH, an increase from 9.2 times in 2017. The top five companies spent a mean of 7.2% of their net sales on R&D. Overall, $7.7 billion is allocated to MSK research annually, with only 9.1% from public sources.

Conclusion: Given this disparity, efforts should assess public investment in orthopedic research while recognizing the critical role of industry in funding musculoskeletal research. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):e182-e186.].

背景:本研究的目的是分析2012年至2021年美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对肌肉骨骼(MSK)研究的资助趋势,比较私人行业资助与NIH资助,确定公共与私人来源的MSK研究资金总额的比例,并研究私营行业研究与开发(R&D)支出与净销售额的关系。材料和方法:2012年至2021年的公共研究资金使用NIH数据汇总MSK条件,资金为1000万美元。私人研发资金来自收入排名前五的骨科公司,并与净销售额进行比较,以计算研发占总销售额的百分比。采用了美国证券交易委员会(sec)提交的年度财务报表。每年汇总私人资金,并使用描述性统计将其与国家关节炎、肌肉骨骼和皮肤疾病研究所的支出进行比较。结果:前五大骨科公司的年度研究经费是NIH的10.0倍,高于2017年的9.2倍。排名前五的公司平均将其净销售额的7.2%用于研发。总的来说,每年有77亿美元用于MSK研究,其中只有9.1%来自公共资源。结论:鉴于这种差异,我们应该努力评估骨科研究的公共投资,同时认识到工业在资助肌肉骨骼研究方面的关键作用。[矫形手术。48 2025; (4): e182-e186。]。
{"title":"Comparison of Industry and National Institutes of Health Funding for Orthopedic Surgery Research.","authors":"Mitchell K Ng, Pedro Rullan-Oliver, Matthew Magruder, Paul G Mastrokostas, Viktor E Krebs, Javad Parvizi, Michael A Mont, Nicolas S Piuzzi","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250625-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250625-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this study were to analyze trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for musculoskeletal (MSK) research from 2012 to 2021, compare private industry funding to NIH funding, determine the proportion of total MSK research funding from public versus private sources, and examine how private industry research and development (R&D) spending has evolved in relation to net sales.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Public research funding from 2012 to 2021 was aggregated using NIH data for MSK conditions with >$10M in funding. Private R&D funding was obtained from the top five orthopedic companies by revenue and compared to net sales to calculate R&D as a percentage of total sales. Annually reported financial statements from Securities Exchange Commission filings were used. Private funding was summed annually and compared to National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases spending using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual research funding from the top five orthopedic companies is 10.0 times that of the NIH, an increase from 9.2 times in 2017. The top five companies spent a mean of 7.2% of their net sales on R&D. Overall, $7.7 billion is allocated to MSK research annually, with only 9.1% from public sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given this disparity, efforts should assess public investment in orthopedic research while recognizing the critical role of industry in funding musculoskeletal research. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):e182-e186.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"48 4","pages":"e182-e186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous Occurrence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion and Adjacent Anterior Meniscal Root Tear Not Uncommon in Patients With Tibial Posterior Condyle Fracture, Particularly Those With a Long Vertical Split. 胫骨后髁骨折患者同时发生前交叉韧带撕脱和临近前半月板根撕裂并不罕见,尤其是那些有长垂直裂的患者。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250619-01
Fu-Ting Huang, Kai-Cheng Lin, Chih-Yang Lin

Background: Tibial posterior condyle fractures (PCFs) are caused by shearing injuries. This mechanism results in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsions, which may involve adjacent anterior meniscal roots. The simultaneous occurrence of ACL avulsion and anterior meniscal root tears (AMRTs) in patients with PCF remains unclear. Therefore, we reported the pattern of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT in patients with PCF. Additionally, we investigated which morphological characteristics of PCFs can predict the occurrence of these combined injuries.

Materials and methods: This study included 77 patients with PCF and ACL avulsion. AMRT was diagnosed through arthroscope. PCF morphologies-fragment rotation angle, fragment-plateau ratio, fragment length, and fragment sagittal angle-were measured through computed tomography.

Results: Of the 77 patients, 24 (31%) had AMRT. Patients with AMRT had a longer fragment length than did those without AMRT (5.6±1.0 cm vs 4.2±0.7 cm, respectively; P<.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a threshold fragment length of 4.4 cm for predicting simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT. Multivariate logistic regression indicated a fragment length of ≥4.4 cm was associated 12-fold increased risk of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT (95% CI: 3.29-45.67; P<.001).

Conclusions: AMRT occurs in 31% of all patients with PCF plus ACL avulsion and is an obstacle to ACL reduction. A PCF fragment length of ≥4.4 cm is a significant independent predictor of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT. Our findings may facilitate relevant risk assessment and counseling in patients requiring an intra-articular intervention. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):215-222.].

背景:胫骨后髁骨折(PCFs)是由剪切损伤引起的。这种机制导致前交叉韧带(ACL)撕脱,可能累及相邻的前半月板根。PCF患者ACL撕脱和前半月板根撕裂(AMRTs)的同时发生尚不清楚。因此,我们报道了PCF患者同时发生ACL撕脱和AMRT的模式。此外,我们还研究了pcf的哪些形态学特征可以预测这些合并损伤的发生。材料与方法:本研究纳入77例PCF合并前交叉韧带撕脱。通过关节镜诊断AMRT。通过计算机断层扫描测量PCF形态——碎片旋转角度、碎片平台比、碎片长度和碎片矢状角。结果:77例患者中,24例(31%)行AMRT。接受AMRT治疗的患者比未接受AMRT治疗的患者片段长度更长(分别为5.6±1.0 cm和4.2±0.7 cm);ppp结论:31%的PCF合并ACL撕脱患者发生了AMRT,并且是ACL复位的障碍。PCF片段长度≥4.4 cm是同时发生ACL撕脱和AMRT的重要独立预测因子。我们的研究结果可能有助于对需要关节内干预的患者进行相关的风险评估和咨询。[矫形手术。2025; 48(4): 215 - 222。]。
{"title":"Simultaneous Occurrence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion and Adjacent Anterior Meniscal Root Tear Not Uncommon in Patients With Tibial Posterior Condyle Fracture, Particularly Those With a Long Vertical Split.","authors":"Fu-Ting Huang, Kai-Cheng Lin, Chih-Yang Lin","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250619-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250619-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial posterior condyle fractures (PCFs) are caused by shearing injuries. This mechanism results in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsions, which may involve adjacent anterior meniscal roots. The simultaneous occurrence of ACL avulsion and anterior meniscal root tears (AMRTs) in patients with PCF remains unclear. Therefore, we reported the pattern of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT in patients with PCF. Additionally, we investigated which morphological characteristics of PCFs can predict the occurrence of these combined injuries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 77 patients with PCF and ACL avulsion. AMRT was diagnosed through arthroscope. PCF morphologies-fragment rotation angle, fragment-plateau ratio, fragment length, and fragment sagittal angle-were measured through computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 77 patients, 24 (31%) had AMRT. Patients with AMRT had a longer fragment length than did those without AMRT (5.6±1.0 cm vs 4.2±0.7 cm, respectively; <i>P</i><.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a threshold fragment length of 4.4 cm for predicting simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT. Multivariate logistic regression indicated a fragment length of ≥4.4 cm was associated 12-fold increased risk of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT (95% CI: 3.29-45.67; <i>P</i><.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMRT occurs in 31% of all patients with PCF plus ACL avulsion and is an obstacle to ACL reduction. A PCF fragment length of ≥4.4 cm is a significant independent predictor of simultaneous ACL avulsion and AMRT. Our findings may facilitate relevant risk assessment and counseling in patients requiring an intra-articular intervention. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):215-222.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"48 4","pages":"215-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Decisional Regret in Orthopedic Surgery: Tools, Time Points, and Score Interpretation. 测量骨科手术中的决策后悔:工具、时间点和评分解释。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250620-02
Michael Jeffko, Iyan Younus, Aiyush Bansal, Patricia Lipson, Jack Sedwick, Maxey Cherel, Laura Reynolds, Philip Louie

Background: As shared decision-making models gain prominence, patients are taking on more responsibility in deciding whether to undergo surgery. Decisional regret is a key patient-reported outcome (PRO) to evaluate quality of care and surgical success. With increased emphasis on decisional regret, determining the tools to measure regret is of increasing importance. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate and identify the tools used to measure decisional regret in elective orthopedic surgery and (2) examine the time frame in which regret is measured postoperatively.

Materials and methods: The authors conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases from database inception until September 5, 2024. All studies that discussed a patient's decisional regret in the context of elective orthopedic surgery were eligible.

Results: Initial results yielded 1,002 articles, and 26 were chosen for inclusion. The Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) was the most used tool, appearing in 54% of the articles. Novel, study-specific questions were used in 19% of the studies, while 15% used question 22 of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 tool and 11% used non-standardized patient interviews. Regret was assessed postoperatively at >24 months in 15% of studies, at 24 months in 17%, at 12 months in 22%, at 6 months in 26%, at multiple time frames in 4%, and was not stated in 8%.

Conclusion: Decisional regret is an increasingly important PRO that can help optimize medical interventions. The DRS, used in more than half of the studies analyzed, is the most widely adopted and validated tool for quantifying regret and should be prioritized in future research. While timing of regret assessment varied, the 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals were the most common and are suggested as standard time points for measuring regret. Additionally, establishing clinical stratifications for regret scores will facilitate meta-analysis and improve risk factor identification, enhancing shared decision-making and patient care. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):e153-e161.].

背景:随着共享决策模式的日益突出,患者在决定是否接受手术方面承担了更多的责任。决定后悔是评估护理质量和手术成功的关键患者报告结果(PRO)。随着对决策后悔的日益重视,确定衡量后悔的工具变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是:(1)调查并确定用于测量选择性骨科手术决策后悔的工具;(2)检查术后后悔测量的时间框架。材料和方法:作者对PubMed/MEDLINE和Embase数据库从建库到2024年9月5日进行了系统的文献综述。所有讨论择期骨科手术患者决策后悔的研究均符合条件。结果:初步结果为1002篇,其中26篇入选。决策后悔量表(DRS)是最常用的工具,出现在54%的文章中。19%的研究使用了新颖的、研究特定的问题,15%的研究使用了脊柱侧凸研究协会-22工具的问题22,11%的研究使用了非标准化的患者访谈。15%的研究在术后24个月评估后悔,17%的研究在术后24个月评估后悔,22%的研究在术后12个月评估后悔,26%的研究在术后6个月评估后悔,4%的研究在多个时间段评估后悔,8%的研究没有评估后悔。结论:决策后悔是一个越来越重要的PRO,可以帮助优化医疗干预措施。超过一半的分析研究使用了DRS,它是量化后悔的最广泛采用和最有效的工具,应该在未来的研究中优先考虑。虽然后悔评估的时间各不相同,但术后6个月和12个月的间隔是最常见的,并被建议作为衡量后悔的标准时间点。此外,建立后悔评分的临床分层将促进荟萃分析,改善风险因素识别,加强共同决策和患者护理。[矫形手术。48 2025; (4): e153-e161。]。
{"title":"Measuring Decisional Regret in Orthopedic Surgery: Tools, Time Points, and Score Interpretation.","authors":"Michael Jeffko, Iyan Younus, Aiyush Bansal, Patricia Lipson, Jack Sedwick, Maxey Cherel, Laura Reynolds, Philip Louie","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250620-02","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250620-02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As shared decision-making models gain prominence, patients are taking on more responsibility in deciding whether to undergo surgery. Decisional regret is a key patient-reported outcome (PRO) to evaluate quality of care and surgical success. With increased emphasis on decisional regret, determining the tools to measure regret is of increasing importance. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate and identify the tools used to measure decisional regret in elective orthopedic surgery and (2) examine the time frame in which regret is measured postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases from database inception until September 5, 2024. All studies that discussed a patient's decisional regret in the context of elective orthopedic surgery were eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial results yielded 1,002 articles, and 26 were chosen for inclusion. The Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) was the most used tool, appearing in 54% of the articles. Novel, study-specific questions were used in 19% of the studies, while 15% used question 22 of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 tool and 11% used non-standardized patient interviews. Regret was assessed postoperatively at >24 months in 15% of studies, at 24 months in 17%, at 12 months in 22%, at 6 months in 26%, at multiple time frames in 4%, and was not stated in 8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decisional regret is an increasingly important PRO that can help optimize medical interventions. The DRS, used in more than half of the studies analyzed, is the most widely adopted and validated tool for quantifying regret and should be prioritized in future research. While timing of regret assessment varied, the 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals were the most common and are suggested as standard time points for measuring regret. Additionally, establishing clinical stratifications for regret scores will facilitate meta-analysis and improve risk factor identification, enhancing shared decision-making and patient care. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):e153-e161.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"48 4","pages":"e153-e161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do the Skin Colors Depicted in Orthopedic Literature Reflect the Population? 骨科文献中描述的肤色是否反映了人口?
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250610-01
Dre'Marcus Ferrell, Walter Klyce, Raymond W Liu

Background: Depictions of skin color in medical journals have been observed to misrepresent the population in other fields but have not been studied in orthopedics. We assessed whether the spectrum of skin color depicted in orthopedic literature appropriately reflects the population and whether that representation has changed over time.

Materials and methods: We examined images of human patients published in four journals: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS), Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR), Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (JAAOS), and The American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) in 2010 and 2020. Fitzpatrick skin phototypes were used to categorize images as "lighter skin tone" (types I-III) or "darker skin tone" (types IV-VI), with the latter attributed to Black, Asian, Native American, and multiracial individuals. We compared published skin tones to 2020 United States census data (38% of the population being Fitzpatrick types IV-VI) using chi-square analysis.

Results: Of 649 eligible images, 13% depicted Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. There was no significant change from 2010 to 2020 (11% vs 16%, P=0.07) in depictions of Fitzpatrick types IV and above. Darker skin tones were underrepresented compared to the US population (13% vs 38%, P<0.001). In US-based articles representation increased from 11% to 18% (P=0.045), but no change was observed in non-US articles (12% vs 12%, P=0.9).

Conclusion: While there has been a mild improvement over time in the diversity of skin colors represented, the depiction of darker skin types in orthopedic literature still falls well short of that seen in the general population. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):197-202.].

背景:在医学期刊上对肤色的描述在其他领域被观察到是对人群的歪曲,但在骨科领域尚未进行研究。我们评估了骨科文献中描述的肤色谱是否恰当地反映了人群,以及这种表现是否随着时间的推移而发生了变化。材料和方法:我们研究了2010年和2020年发表在《骨与关节外科杂志》(JBJS)、《临床骨科与相关研究》(CORR)、《美国骨科学会杂志》(JAAOS)和《美国运动医学杂志》(AJSM)四种期刊上的人类患者图像。菲茨帕特里克皮肤照片类型用于将图像分类为“浅色肤色”(I-III型)或“深色肤色”(IV-VI型),后者归因于黑人、亚洲人、美洲原住民和多种族个体。我们使用卡方分析将公布的肤色与2020年美国人口普查数据(38%的人口为菲茨帕特里克IV-VI型)进行了比较。结果:在649张符合条件的图像中,13%描绘的是IV-VI型Fitzpatrick皮肤。从2010年到2020年,Fitzpatrick IV型及以上的描述没有显著变化(11% vs 16%, P=0.07)。与美国人群相比,肤色较深的人群代表性不足(13%对38%,PP=0.045),但在非美国人群中没有观察到变化(12%对12%,P=0.9)。结论:虽然随着时间的推移,所代表的肤色多样性有了轻微的改善,但骨科文献中对深色皮肤类型的描述仍然远远低于一般人群。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Do the Skin Colors Depicted in Orthopedic Literature Reflect the Population?","authors":"Dre'Marcus Ferrell, Walter Klyce, Raymond W Liu","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250610-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250610-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depictions of skin color in medical journals have been observed to misrepresent the population in other fields but have not been studied in orthopedics. We assessed whether the spectrum of skin color depicted in orthopedic literature appropriately reflects the population and whether that representation has changed over time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We examined images of human patients published in four journals: <i>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery</i> (JBJS), <i>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research</i> (CORR), <i>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</i> (JAAOS), and <i>The American Journal of Sports Medicine</i> (AJSM) in 2010 and 2020. Fitzpatrick skin phototypes were used to categorize images as \"lighter skin tone\" (types I-III) or \"darker skin tone\" (types IV-VI), with the latter attributed to Black, Asian, Native American, and multiracial individuals. We compared published skin tones to 2020 United States census data (38% of the population being Fitzpatrick types IV-VI) using chi-square analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 649 eligible images, 13% depicted Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. There was no significant change from 2010 to 2020 (11% vs 16%, <i>P</i>=0.07) in depictions of Fitzpatrick types IV and above. Darker skin tones were underrepresented compared to the US population (13% vs 38%, <i>P</i><0.001). In US-based articles representation increased from 11% to 18% (<i>P</i>=0.045), but no change was observed in non-US articles (12% vs 12%, <i>P</i>=0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there has been a mild improvement over time in the diversity of skin colors represented, the depiction of darker skin types in orthopedic literature still falls well short of that seen in the general population. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):197-202.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"197-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144554091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Fever Following Pelvic and Acetabular Fixation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Lack of Association With Surgical Site Infection. 骨盆和髋臼固定术后发热:发生率、危险因素和与手术部位感染缺乏相关性。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250506-01
Mark Ayoub, Eric Curtis, Yeng Vue, Daniel Wilson, Kamran Movassaghi

Background: Despite numerous studies showing postoperative fever can be a common and benign occurrence, there is still a significant and costly workup when fevers occur after surgery, including for orthopedic patients with pelvic ring and acetabular injuries.

Material and methods: A total of 204 patients undergoing pelvis and/or acetabular fixation were analyzed for fever, with positive fever defined as temperature >38° Celsius. Age, sex, substance use, smoking history, body mass index, diabetes, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, fracture morphology, polytrauma, surgical treatment, transfusion requirements, operative time, estimated blood loss, use of vancomycin powder, and surgical site infection (SSI) were all recorded. Surgical site infection was defined as an infection at the surgical site requiring reoperation, with positive cultures at time of secondary surgery.

Results: SSI was not associated with postoperative fever in patients undergoing pelvic and/or acetabular fixation. Higher ASA score, polytrauma, combined pelvic ring-acetabular fractures, open pelvic ring injuries, increased intraoperative blood loss, increased surgical time, and transfusions were associated with higher rates of fevers on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed transfusions were the only independent risk factor for developing fever.

Conclusion: Surgeons and clinicians managing orthopedic patients should be aware that postoperative fever is common after pelvis and acetabular fixation and is rarely related to SSI. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):229-233.].

背景:尽管大量研究表明术后发热可能是一种常见的良性现象,但手术后发热仍然需要进行大量且昂贵的检查,包括骨盆环和髋臼损伤的骨科患者。材料和方法:对204例接受骨盆和/或髋臼固定的患者进行发热分析,阳性发热定义为体温bb0 ~ 38℃。记录年龄、性别、药物使用、吸烟史、体重指数、糖尿病、合并症、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分、骨折形态、多发创伤、手术治疗、输血要求、手术时间、估计失血量、万古霉素粉的使用和手术部位感染(SSI)。手术部位感染定义为需要再次手术的手术部位感染,在二次手术时培养呈阳性。结果:在骨盆和/或髋臼固定的患者中,SSI与术后发热无关。单因素分析显示,较高的ASA评分、多发创伤、骨盆环-髋臼合并骨折、开放性骨盆环损伤、术中出血量增加、手术时间增加和输血与较高的发热率相关。多因素分析显示输血是发生发热的唯一独立危险因素。结论:骨科患者的外科医生和临床医生应该意识到,骨盆和髋臼固定术后发烧是常见的,很少与SSI有关。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Postoperative Fever Following Pelvic and Acetabular Fixation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Lack of Association With Surgical Site Infection.","authors":"Mark Ayoub, Eric Curtis, Yeng Vue, Daniel Wilson, Kamran Movassaghi","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250506-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250506-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous studies showing postoperative fever can be a common and benign occurrence, there is still a significant and costly workup when fevers occur after surgery, including for orthopedic patients with pelvic ring and acetabular injuries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 204 patients undergoing pelvis and/or acetabular fixation were analyzed for fever, with positive fever defined as temperature >38° Celsius. Age, sex, substance use, smoking history, body mass index, diabetes, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, fracture morphology, polytrauma, surgical treatment, transfusion requirements, operative time, estimated blood loss, use of vancomycin powder, and surgical site infection (SSI) were all recorded. Surgical site infection was defined as an infection at the surgical site requiring reoperation, with positive cultures at time of secondary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SSI was not associated with postoperative fever in patients undergoing pelvic and/or acetabular fixation. Higher ASA score, polytrauma, combined pelvic ring-acetabular fractures, open pelvic ring injuries, increased intraoperative blood loss, increased surgical time, and transfusions were associated with higher rates of fevers on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed transfusions were the only independent risk factor for developing fever.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons and clinicians managing orthopedic patients should be aware that postoperative fever is common after pelvis and acetabular fixation and is rarely related to SSI. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):229-233.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"229-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144110788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Connecting Lives: Honoring the Gifts by Completing the Circle of Musculoskeletal Tissue Donation for Allograft Use Across Orthopedics. 连接生命:通过完成跨骨科同种异体移植使用的肌肉骨骼组织捐赠循环来履行礼物。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250509-01
Kylee Rucinski, Cory R Crecelius, James P Stannard, Brett D Crist, Kyle M Schweser, Clayton W Nuelle, Steven DeFroda, Richard Ma, Nichole S Wilson, Lisa M Moore, Hannah J Evans, James L Cook

Background: Each year, more than 1 million patients in the United States receive life-changing musculoskeletal (MSK) tissue transplants. These transformative gifts save and restore lives. Unfortunately, data from organ procurement organizations suggest that orthopedic patients rarely contact donor families to acknowledge the gift, with less than 1% of tissue donor families ever receiving communication from recipients of their loved one's gifts.

Materials and methods: In response, our team launched the "Connecting Lives" initiative in 2015 to address this gap. Initially focused on osteochondral and meniscus allograft, it expanded to all MSK allograft recipients at our facility in 2022.

Results: Among osteochondral and meniscus allograft recipients, this quality improvement initiative increased the percentage of MSK tissue transplant recipients writing to donor families from less than 1% to nearly 18%, comparable to organ donation rates (approximately 20%). The main barrier for non-writers was uncertainty about what to say. Despite this improvement, further efforts are needed to close the Tissue Donation Circle.

Conclusion: Engaging patients before and after transplant surgery can help address emotional and practical barriers, fostering connection and honoring tissue donors. Orthopedic health care teams must contribute to "closing the loop" between allograft recipients and donor families through education, advocacy, resourcing, and support that drive completion of the Tissue Donation Circle. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):234-238.].

背景:在美国,每年有超过100万患者接受改变生活的肌肉骨骼(MSK)组织移植。这些变革性的礼物拯救和恢复生命。不幸的是,来自器官采购组织的数据表明,骨科患者很少联系捐赠者的家庭来感谢捐赠,只有不到1%的组织捐赠者家庭收到过他们所爱的人的礼物接受者的信息。材料和方法:为此,我们的团队在2015年发起了“连接生活”倡议,以解决这一差距。最初专注于骨软骨和半月板移植,于2022年扩展到我们工厂的所有MSK异体移植受体。结果:在骨软骨和半月板同种异体移植受者中,这一质量改善举措将MSK组织移植受者写信给供者家庭的比例从不足1%提高到近18%,与器官捐赠率(约20%)相当。非作家的主要障碍是不确定该说什么。尽管情况有所改善,但要关闭组织捐赠圈还需要进一步的努力。结论:在移植手术前后与患者接触有助于解决情感和实际障碍,促进联系并尊重组织捐赠者。骨科医疗团队必须通过教育、宣传、资源和支持推动组织捐赠循环的完成,为同种异体移植受者和供体家庭之间的“闭环”做出贡献。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Connecting Lives: Honoring the Gifts by Completing the Circle of Musculoskeletal Tissue Donation for Allograft Use Across Orthopedics.","authors":"Kylee Rucinski, Cory R Crecelius, James P Stannard, Brett D Crist, Kyle M Schweser, Clayton W Nuelle, Steven DeFroda, Richard Ma, Nichole S Wilson, Lisa M Moore, Hannah J Evans, James L Cook","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250509-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250509-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each year, more than 1 million patients in the United States receive life-changing musculoskeletal (MSK) tissue transplants. These transformative gifts save and restore lives. Unfortunately, data from organ procurement organizations suggest that orthopedic patients rarely contact donor families to acknowledge the gift, with less than 1% of tissue donor families ever receiving communication from recipients of their loved one's gifts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In response, our team launched the \"Connecting Lives\" initiative in 2015 to address this gap. Initially focused on osteochondral and meniscus allograft, it expanded to all MSK allograft recipients at our facility in 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among osteochondral and meniscus allograft recipients, this quality improvement initiative increased the percentage of MSK tissue transplant recipients writing to donor families from less than 1% to nearly 18%, comparable to organ donation rates (approximately 20%). The main barrier for non-writers was uncertainty about what to say. Despite this improvement, further efforts are needed to close the Tissue Donation Circle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Engaging patients before and after transplant surgery can help address emotional and practical barriers, fostering connection and honoring tissue donors. Orthopedic health care teams must contribute to \"closing the loop\" between allograft recipients and donor families through education, advocacy, resourcing, and support that drive completion of the Tissue Donation Circle. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):234-238.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"234-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144110111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radial Head Fractures: Current Trends in Treatment and Outcomes, A Retrospective Review. 桡骨头骨折:目前的治疗趋势和结果,回顾性回顾。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250430-01
Kayleigh N Renfro, Cole Patrick, Nata Parnes, Annette Yoon, John Dunn

Background: Radial head fractures are common elbow fractures in adults, and their treatment algorithm remains controversial. Particularly with displaced Mason III or IV radial head fractures, studies have shown mixed results when comparing outcomes between radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Although multifactorial, patient characteristics often play a large role in treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to analyze the current trend in the management of radial head fractures, complications, and need for repeat operation among these groups.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective database review using the IBM Truven MarketScan Databases and analyzing all available patients treated for radial head fractures between 2015 to 2020. Patients were grouped by treatment modality, including nonoperative, ORIF, radial head excision (RHE), and RHA. Patient characteristics, complication rates, reoperation rates, and predictive factors for undergoing surgery were assessed.

Results: Our search yielded 18,945 cases of radial head fractures that underwent treatment. The majority of patients were managed nonoperatively (16,035), and fewer were treated via ORIF, RHA, and RHE (1,636, 1,174, and 100, respectively). Of these, between 1% and 2.5% of patients in each group underwent revision surgery.

Conclusion: We found that patients who undergo RHA or RHE are typically older and have more comorbidities compared to patients who are treated nonoperatively or undergo ORIF. We found no significant difference in reoperation rates based on initial mode of treatment. Male sex, osteoporosis, coronary artery disease, and a displaced fracture are predictive of undergoing surgery for a radial head fracture. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):e169-e176.].

背景:桡骨头骨折是成人常见的肘部骨折,其治疗方法仍有争议。特别是移位的Mason III型或IV型桡骨头骨折,研究显示桡骨头置换术(RHA)和切开复位内固定(ORIF)的疗效比较结果不一。虽然是多因素的,但患者的特点往往在治疗方式中起着很大的作用。本研究的目的是分析目前桡骨头骨折的治疗趋势、并发症和重复手术的必要性。材料和方法:我们使用IBM Truven MarketScan数据库进行了回顾性数据库回顾,并分析了2015年至2020年间治疗桡骨头骨折的所有可用患者。患者按治疗方式分组,包括非手术、ORIF、桡骨头切除术(RHE)和RHA。评估患者特征、并发症发生率、再手术率和手术的预测因素。结果:我们的研究获得了18,945例接受治疗的桡骨头骨折。大多数患者采用非手术治疗(16035例),较少的患者采用ORIF、RHA和RHE治疗(分别为1636例、1174例和100例)。其中,每组中有1% - 2.5%的患者接受了翻修手术。结论:我们发现,与非手术治疗或ORIF治疗的患者相比,接受RHA或RHE治疗的患者通常年龄较大,并且有更多的合并症。我们发现不同初始治疗方式的再手术率无显著差异。男性、骨质疏松、冠状动脉疾病和移位性骨折是桡骨头骨折手术的预测因素。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Radial Head Fractures: Current Trends in Treatment and Outcomes, A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Kayleigh N Renfro, Cole Patrick, Nata Parnes, Annette Yoon, John Dunn","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250430-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250430-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radial head fractures are common elbow fractures in adults, and their treatment algorithm remains controversial. Particularly with displaced Mason III or IV radial head fractures, studies have shown mixed results when comparing outcomes between radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Although multifactorial, patient characteristics often play a large role in treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to analyze the current trend in the management of radial head fractures, complications, and need for repeat operation among these groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective database review using the IBM Truven MarketScan Databases and analyzing all available patients treated for radial head fractures between 2015 to 2020. Patients were grouped by treatment modality, including nonoperative, ORIF, radial head excision (RHE), and RHA. Patient characteristics, complication rates, reoperation rates, and predictive factors for undergoing surgery were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 18,945 cases of radial head fractures that underwent treatment. The majority of patients were managed nonoperatively (16,035), and fewer were treated via ORIF, RHA, and RHE (1,636, 1,174, and 100, respectively). Of these, between 1% and 2.5% of patients in each group underwent revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that patients who undergo RHA or RHE are typically older and have more comorbidities compared to patients who are treated nonoperatively or undergo ORIF. We found no significant difference in reoperation rates based on initial mode of treatment. Male sex, osteoporosis, coronary artery disease, and a displaced fracture are predictive of undergoing surgery for a radial head fracture. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):e169-e176.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e169-e176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144110794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis: Hand Surgeons Versus Other Orthopedic Subspecialists. 化脓性屈肌腱滑膜炎手术治疗结果的比较:手外科医生与其他骨科专科医生。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20250513-01
Naomi Kelley, Tomas Holy, Laurie Wells, Allicia Imada, Nathan T Morrell

Background: Call patterns among hospital systems vary. At our institution, most pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (FTS) patients receive irrigation and debridement (I&D) from non-hand-trained orthopedic specialists on call. Our hypothesis was that there would be no outcome differences among patients managed by hand surgeons versus non-hand surgeons.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent I&D for FTS over a six-year period. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, past medical history, laboratory results indicating inflammation, time to the operating room, and Kanavel signs were collected. Outcomes were range of motion (ROM) and pain at last follow-up, return to OR (RTOR) rate, and need for amputation. A significance level of P<0.05 was used.

Results: There were 128 patients and 153 digits with a postoperative diagnosis of FTS that underwent I&D. The most common medical comorbidities were diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and end-stage renal disease. The most common presenting signs were pain with passive extension and resting digital flexion, but most patients presented with all four Kanavel signs. The RTOR rates for non-hand-and hand-trained surgeons were 22% and 26%, respectively (P>0.05). There were no significant differences when comparing postoperative pain and ROM, as well as RTOR rates. Amputation rates among non-hand and hand surgeons were similar at 7% and 5%, respectively (P>0.05).

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in outcomes, RTOR rates, or amputations among non-hand-versus hand-trained orthopedic surgeons acutely managing FTS. Surgical treatment for FTS should not be delayed if a hand surgeon is unavailable. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(4):e162-e168.].

背景:医院系统之间的呼叫模式各不相同。在我们的机构,大多数化脓性屈肌腱滑膜炎(FTS)患者接受冲洗和清创(I&D),由非手部训练的骨科专家随叫随到。我们的假设是,手外科医生和非手外科医生治疗的患者之间没有结果差异。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为6年以上因FTS而接受I&D治疗的患者。收集患者的人口统计资料、损伤机制、既往病史、炎症的实验室结果、到手术室的时间和卡纳维尔体征。结果是最后随访时的活动范围(ROM)和疼痛,回到手术室(RTOR)率和截肢需求。结果具有显著性水平:术后诊断为FTS的患者128例,手指153根,行I&D。最常见的医学合并症是糖尿病、周围血管疾病和终末期肾脏疾病。最常见的症状是疼痛伴被动伸展和静止指屈,但大多数患者同时出现四种卡纳维尔体征。非手工和手工训练的外科医生的RTOR率分别为22%和26% (P < 0.05)。在比较术后疼痛和ROM以及RTOR率时,没有显着差异。非手外科和手外科的截肢率相似,分别为7%和5% (P < 0.05)。结论:在急性FTS治疗中,非手工训练的骨科医生与手工训练的骨科医生在预后、RTOR率或截肢方面没有显著差异。手术治疗FTS不应延误,如果没有手外科医生。[矫形手术。202 x; 4 x (x): xx-xx。]。
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis: Hand Surgeons Versus Other Orthopedic Subspecialists.","authors":"Naomi Kelley, Tomas Holy, Laurie Wells, Allicia Imada, Nathan T Morrell","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250513-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/01477447-20250513-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Call patterns among hospital systems vary. At our institution, most pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (FTS) patients receive irrigation and debridement (I&D) from non-hand-trained orthopedic specialists on call. Our hypothesis was that there would be no outcome differences among patients managed by hand surgeons versus non-hand surgeons.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent I&D for FTS over a six-year period. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, past medical history, laboratory results indicating inflammation, time to the operating room, and Kanavel signs were collected. Outcomes were range of motion (ROM) and pain at last follow-up, return to OR (RTOR) rate, and need for amputation. A significance level of <i>P</i><0.05 was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 128 patients and 153 digits with a postoperative diagnosis of FTS that underwent I&D. The most common medical comorbidities were diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and end-stage renal disease. The most common presenting signs were pain with passive extension and resting digital flexion, but most patients presented with all four Kanavel signs. The RTOR rates for non-hand-and hand-trained surgeons were 22% and 26%, respectively (<i>P</i>>0.05). There were no significant differences when comparing postoperative pain and ROM, as well as RTOR rates. Amputation rates among non-hand and hand surgeons were similar at 7% and 5%, respectively (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in outcomes, RTOR rates, or amputations among non-hand-versus hand-trained orthopedic surgeons acutely managing FTS. Surgical treatment for FTS should not be delayed if a hand surgeon is unavailable. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(4):e162-e168.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e162-e168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144234729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Orthopedics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1