Optometry and Vision Science最新文献

Significance: Topical cyclosporine A (CsA) for the treatment of dry eye disease is often associated with instillation discomfort, which may negatively influence patient adherence to therapy. This study found that refrigerating topical CsA reduced instillation discomfort compared with instillation of warm CsA. Thus, refrigerating CsA prior to instillation may improve patient experience when using CsA to manage dry eye disease.

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify instillation discomfort associated with cold or warm instillation of a 0.09% CsA.

Methods: Forty participants with symptomatic aqueous deficient dry eye were enrolled. A drop of cold (4°C) CsA was instilled in one eye, and a drop of warm (23°C) CsA was instilled in the other eye. The order and eye receiving the cold drop were randomized. Participants rated the discomfort of each eye (0, no discomfort; 10, maximal discomfort) prior to drop instillation, immediately post-instillation, and at each subsequent minute for 10 minutes. Area under the curve was used to quantify cumulative discomfort.

Results: Forty participants (39.6 ± 18.9 years old, 82% female) completed the study. A majority of participants (n = 24, 60%) experienced reduced cumulative discomfort with cold CsA, whereas the remainder experienced minimal difference (n = 10, 25%) or increased cumulative discomfort (n = 6, 15%). For those with reduced discomfort (n = 24), cumulative discomfort associated with cold instillation (median, 11.5 [2.2, 20.0]) was significantly lower (p<0.01) than cumulative discomfort associated with warm instillation (median, 17.5 [11.2, 32.2]). Cold instillation was associated with a median reduction of 1 discomfort point immediately post-instillation and at all subsequent time points (all p≤0.04, but not significant at t = 10), compared with warm instillation.

Conclusions: Up to 60% of participants found that cold instillation of CsA solution induced less discomfort than warm instillation, lasting up to 9 minutes post-instillation. In contrast, although 15% of participants found reduced discomfort with warm instillation, the magnitude of discomfort associated with warm instillation was not significantly different than cold instillation.

Significance: Evaporative dry eye disease, due to meibomian gland dysfunction, causes significant suffering for millions of people globally, yet satisfactory long-term treatment remains elusive for many. Investigation of potential therapies for meibomian gland dysfunction is therefore of high importance to clinicians and their patients.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a new device for meibomian gland debridement and expression to that of the conventional way of providing this treatment.

Methods: Thirty participants (mean age, 36.4 ± 15.4 years; 77% female) fulfilling current Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society diagnostic criteria for dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction were recruited (Research Registry, 10340). Fifteen participants each were randomized to receive a single treatment with either traditional debridement (using a golf-club spud), heating (10 minutes of Blepha EyeBag, Théa Laboratories, Clermont-Ferrand, France) and expression (with forceps), or the multimodal MGrx, which comprises a handheld device with heated debridement, massage, and expression attachments. Symptomatology, tear film, and ocular surface measures were assessed at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment.

Results: Ocular Surface Disease Index, 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire, and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye symptom questionnaire scores all improved significantly with both treatments (all p<0.001), with no subsequent deterioration for at least 8 weeks. The improvement was similar between treatment groups (all p>0.05). Clinical signs, of blink rate, tear film quality and quantity, ocular surface characteristics, and meibomian gland expressibility, were all unchanged with both treatments (all p>0.05) except for noninvasive tear breakup time, which deteriorated in the conventional treatment group (p=0.006) between 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment. No adverse reactions were reported, and all participants were able to tolerate treatment.

Conclusions: A single application of meibomian gland debridement and expression resulted in sustained improvements in the symptoms of dry eye disease, in both treatment groups. The MGrx device provides a safe and effective in-office treatment for evaporative dry eye disease, and has time and space advantages compared with conventional treatment.

In this Prentice Medal Award lecture, I shall recount my career in vision science in the context of three types of inspiration-"being inspired," "personal inspiration," and "inspiring others." My research has derived inspiration from a variety of sources, such as contemporary and historical research doyens in the ophthalmic field and beyond, artists, Greek philosophers, and abstract constructs such as principles and adages. A given moment of inspiration can range from being a profound experience to a subtle realization during a quiet moment of reflection. Here I shall recount the primary research domains of vision science that have defined my academic career in the context of the three types of inspiration defined above. These research domains are ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy, ocular response to contact lens wear, contact lens-induced parainflammation, contact lens-associated microbial keratitis, grading scales for contact lens complications, contact lens prescribing surveys, material properties of contact lenses, contact lens compliance, history of contact lenses, ocular thermography, and ophthalmic bibliometrics. The notions of "being inspired" and "personal inspiration" are necessarily subjective, although I have endeavored to present them here in a scientific context. Conversely, the notion of "inspiring others" can be objectively gauged, at least in part, by counting article citations or the number of times articles are read online or downloaded from a journal website. In conclusion, my research in the vision sciences has been inspired by others, derived from personal ideas, and perhaps in turn has inspired others.

Significance: This study examines a potential stress test of repeated blink refrainment and its effects on the interblink period and the rate of evaporative ocular surface cooling. Such a test could aid in the study of computer vision syndrome, in which screen users unconsciously delay blinking, leading to onset of symptoms.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the length of the maximum achievable interblink time and the rate of ocular surface cooling under stress test conditions of repeated refrainment from blinking for as long as possible.

Methods: Subjects acclimated to the examination room for 10 minutes before measurement and then were asked to hold the eyes open and refrain from blinking for as long as possible (the maximum blink interval), while ocular surface temperature was recorded using an infrared thermographic video camera. Subjects completed 20 trials with four successive blinks separating each trial.

Results: Fifteen subjects (8 female and 7 male subjects) completed the study. The grand mean ocular surface cooling rate was -0.027°C/s (range, -0.338 to +0.014°C/s). A faster ocular surface cooling rate was significantly related to an exponentially shorter maximum blink interval (p<0.001). An increasing number of trials was related to a clinically insignificant increase in the length of the maximum blink interval overall, and a post hoc analysis revealed subject subgroups for whom the stress test was effective or ineffective.

Conclusions: The ocular surface evaporatively cools exponentially during periods of blink refrainment. With a subgroup of subjects with initially stable tear films and normal lipid layer thickness, cumulative tear film stress from repeated, longer-term blink refrainment could contribute to tear evaporation and symptoms of computer vision syndrome.

Virtual issue editorial: This editorial fronts the second virtual issue for Optometry & Vision Science. Virtual issues are a collection of papers from previously published issues of the journal that are brought together in a single, online publication. They highlight the important contribution the journal has made in supporting myopia research. All the papers referenced and previously published in Optometry & Vision Science will be made free access for 1-month. The collection can be accessed here: https://journals.lww.com/optvissci/pages/collectiondetails.aspx?TopicalCollectionId=18.