Optometry and Vision Science最新文献

Significance: Contact lenses are an increasingly popular option for correcting pediatric refractive error due to increased awareness of interventions to slow myopia progression. With limited information on the safety profiles of contact lenses in children, it is important to characterize the current understanding and promote this device's safe and effective use.

Purpose: This scoping review evaluates characteristics of the current literature that have examined the safety of contact lenses in pediatric patients. It provides future directions for systematic reviews and identifies any gaps in the current literature or areas for future research.

Methods: Literature searches in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, trial registries, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial documentation were performed. Included studies (i.e., experimental and quasi-experimental studies; observational studies including prospective and retrospective cohort, case-control, and analytical cross-sectional studies, and case series of 30 or more participants) reported safety and/or complications of the use of any contact lens for correcting refractive error in children (0 to 18 years). Two independent reviewers first screened the titles and abstracts, and then full-text reports for eligibility. Conflicts in eligibility were resolved by discussions with a third reviewer. Two independent reviewers extracted data, including details about the participants, context, study methods, and key findings relevant to the review question.

Results: This scoping review included 73 studies from 10 countries using different contact lens modalities, primarily orthokeratology and soft contact lenses, in children (6 to 18 years). The most common adverse event reported by the studies was corneal staining (60% orthokeratology, 45% soft contact lens).

Conclusions: The need for uniform reporting standards for adverse events poses challenges for comprehensive data synthesis. However, this scoping review identified a sufficient number of studies for a future systematic review to quantify the risks associated with orthokeratology and soft contact lens use in children.

Significance: This work is significant because it is the first Cochrane systemic review that compares the comfort and safety of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses (SCL).

Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a systemic review of randomized trials comparing the comfort and safety of silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs.

Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE.com , PubMed, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched on or before June 24, 2022, to identify randomized clinical trials that compared silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs.

Results: Seven trials were identified and evaluated. One trial reported Ocular Surface Disease Index results, with the evidence being very uncertain about the effects of SCL material on Ocular Surface Disease Index scores (mean difference, -1.20; 95% confidence interval, -10.49 to 8.09). Three trials reported visual analog scale comfort score results, with no clear difference in comfort between materials, although results were of low certainty; trial results could not be combined because the three trials reported results at different time points. None of the included trials reported Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 or Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness scores. There was no evidence of a clinically meaningful difference (>0.5 unit) between daily disposable silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs in corneal staining, conjunctival staining, or conjunctival redness (very low certainty evidence).

Conclusions: The overall evidence for a difference between all included silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCL trials was of very low certainty, with most trials judged as having a high overall risk of bias. There was insufficient evidence to support recommending one SCL material over the other. Future well-designed trials are needed to generate high certainty evidence to further clarify differences in SCL material comfort and safety.

Significance: Dry eye disease is frequently underdiagnosed in pediatric patients. Meibomian gland morphology abnormalities (atrophy and tortuosity) may be associated with dry eye. This study examined risk factors for gland morphology abnormalities in children.

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize meibomian gland morphological abnormalities (atrophy and tortuosity) and identify risk factors for the same in children.

Methods: A total of 160 children, primarily African American and Hispanic, aged 5 to <18 years underwent a comprehensive eye exam including slit-lamp examination to evaluate the meibomian glands, conjunctival papillae, and tear film. Infrared photography was performed including assessment of noninvasive tear film breakup time and tear meniscus height. Meibomian gland atrophy and tortuosity were assessed. A modified Ocular Surface Disease Index survey was administered along with surveys on screen time, diet, and outdoor activity. Linear multiple regression was performed to determine risk factors for meibomian gland abnormalities.

Results: The average age of participants (76 male, 84 female) was 10.9 ± 3.0 years. Severe meibomian gland atrophy (score ≥2) was found in 31.0% of participants in at least one eyelid. Severe meibomian gland tortuosity (score ≥2) was found in 84.0% of participants in at least one eyelid. The median symptom score was 9.8 (range, 0 to 71), with 16.9, 8.8, and 12.5% of the children having mild, moderate, and severe dry eye symptoms, respectively. Elevated body mass index (p<0.001), reduced outdoor activity (p=0.02), and unhealthy diet (p=0.01) were found to be risk factors for meibomian gland abnormalities. Screen time, symptom score, age, gender, and race/ethnicity were not associated with gland abnormalities (all p values >0.05).

Conclusions: This study determined that meibomian gland morphological abnormalities were commonly found in children aged 5 to <18 years. Risk factors for these abnormalities include elevated body mass index, an unhealthy diet, and reduced outdoor activity.

Significance: Prolonged computer use may result in repeated stimulation of the ocular surface due to ocular dryness, potentially leading to alterations in its sensitivity.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between ocular symptoms and corneal sensitivity to cold and mechanical stimuli in computer users.

Methods: Fifty-two young (31 ± 6 years), frequent computer users, including symptomatic and asymptomatic users, participated in this study. Mechanical and cold sensation thresholds were determined at the central cornea of one randomly selected eye of each participant using the UNSW Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer. Ocular surface symptoms and digital eye strain were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index, Ocular Comfort Index, Instant Ocular Symptom Survey, and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q). Associations between central corneal sensation thresholds and demographic variables, patterns of digital device use, and symptom scores were analyzed using Pearson (r) or Spearman (ρ) correlations and linear regression models.

Results: Age (ρ = 0.24), CVS-Q score (ρ = -0.33), CVS-Q dry eye score (ρ = -0.28), and mechanical sensation threshold (ρ = 0.63) were significantly associated with cold sensation threshold (p≤0.04). Conversely, there were no significant relationships with Ocular Surface Disease Index, Ocular Comfort Index, or Instant Ocular Symptom Survey or with other demographic variables (p≥0.34). In multiple linear regression models, age and mechanical sensation threshold were significant predictors of cold sensitivity (p=0.04 and p<0.001, respectively) (adjusted R2 = 0.459). There were no significant correlations between mechanical sensitivity and symptom scores (p≥0.09).

Conclusions: Symptoms of digital eye strain, particularly those related to dry eye, were associated with higher corneal cold sensitivity. Corneal hypersensitivity to cold stimuli as a marker of ocular discomfort during computer use requires further investigation.

Purpose: The central lower TMH is used as a clinical measure of tear volume in the assessment of contact lens candidates and patients with dry eyes. Ethnic differences in eyelid morphology may influence the measurement of the TMH. Furthermore, with the advent of larger contact lenses, such as scleral lenses, it would be of clinical value to assess the TMH centrally and peripherally. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the TMH at different positions along the palpebral margin between Caucasian and Asian eyes.

Methods: This prospective study evaluated the lower TMH in five positions (central, temporal and nasal limbus and temporal and nasal periphery) of the right eye using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus) instrument in Caucasian and Asian participants between 10 am and 12 pm . The TMH at each position was taken three times and averaged and analyzed using a 5 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results: Central TMH did not differ significantly ( F = 0.02, p=0.88) in Caucasians (n = 20, aged 24.45 [2.30] years, TMH 0.320 [0.052] mm) and Asians (n = 20, aged 22.25 [3.43] years, TMH 0.325 [0.048] mm). A difference was noted with respect to TMH positions along the lid margin ( F = 64.17, p<0.001), independent of ethnicity ( F = 2.15, p=0.15). A post hoc analysis revealed a significantly higher TMH temporally when compared with centrally or nasally (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the similarity of the central TMH and the differences in the peripheral TMH within Caucasian and Asian eyes. This may be clinically relevant when using the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II diagnostic algorithm for dry eyes and when fitting scleral contact lenses. Future studies need to consider that ethnic differences may exist for certain tests in order to personalize the care and management of each patient.

Significance: This is the first study to evaluate the retention time of lubricating eye drops containing various concentrations of sodium hyaluronate using fluorophotometry in a symptomatic dry eye population. Information regarding eye drop retention may be useful for eye care practitioners to assist in the selection of more effective treatments for managing dry eye.

Purpose: This study aimed to use fluorophotometry to compare retention time on the ocular surface of three commercially available lubricating eye drops, each containing varying concentrations of sodium hyaluronic acid (HA), and their effects on tear film stability post-instillation in a population with symptoms of dry eye.

Methods: Adults with symptoms of dry eye (Ocular Surface Disease Index score, >12) were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked comparison of eye drops containing 0.15% HA-hydroxypropyl guar (HPGuar), 0.2% HA, and 0.1% HA. Participants were randomized to the eye drop order and the study eye under evaluation. Each eye drop was admixed with a fluorescent tracer (70-kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran) at 10% wt/vol, and 10 μL volume was instilled for each evaluation. A fluorophotometer was used to measure the time for the tracer signal to return to baseline. Fluorescein tear breakup time was measured following fluorophotometry assessment.

Results: Retention time for 0.15% HA-HPGuar and 0.2% HA was significantly longer compared with 0.1% HA (p=0.02 and p=0.03). Fluorescein tear breakup time was significantly longer for the 0.15% HA-HPGuar eye drop compared with both the 0.1% HA eye drop (p=0.01) and 0.2% HA eye drop (p=0.003).

Conclusions: Retention time on the ocular surface of the two eye drops containing higher concentrations of HA was longer than the eye drop with the lowest concentration of HA. The tear film was also more stable with the 0.15% HA-HPGuar eye drop compared with the eye drops containing HA alone, which may be attributable to the other components in the 0.15% HA-HPGuar eye drop.

Significance: Psychometric questionnaires are highly valuable instruments in clinical practice as they make subjective symptoms easier to measure. Recently, a short version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was developed, named OSDI-6.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and compare the diagnostic criteria of three questionnaires, available in the Italian language, designed for assessing dry eye disease: Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), OSDI-12, and specifically the new shortened version, OSDI-6.

Methods: Psychometric evaluations were conducted on 250 adult participants aged 20 to 83 years. Classic and Rasch psychometric analyses were performed on the three questionnaires. The repeatability of the questionnaires was assessed by retesting 120 participants.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis of OSDI-6 indicated saturation on two factors. Repeatability was optimal for all three questionnaires. Based on the reference OSDI-12, the cutoff for OSDI-6 was 5 points and 7 for SPEED. Rasch analysis showed that OSDI-6 and OSDI-12 present disordered response categories and thresholds. Conversely, the SPEED questionnaire shows the optimal item characteristic curve.

Conclusions: The OSDI-12 is a reference questionnaire used in dry eye disease studies and clinics, but OSDI-6 does not represent a perfect shortened version, primarily for the absence of one factor measured and secondarily for the same problem of category response order and thresholds. Conversely, SPEED focusing only on symptoms showed better psychometric properties.

Significance: People with peripheral field loss report colliding with other pedestrians on their blind side(s). We show that, in dyadic collision scenarios between persons, one with field loss, such as homonymous hemianopia, and the other normally sighted pedestrian, collisions occur only if the persons with homonymous hemianopia are overtaking the pedestrians, and the collision risk is concentrated at farther bearing angles than previously suggested.

Purpose: Prior work computed the risk of collision while simulating both pedestrians as points and did not consider the ability of the other pedestrian's normal vision to avoid the collision. We extended the model to better characterize the open space collision risk posed for persons with homonymous hemianopia by normally sighted pedestrians where both have volume.

Methods: We computed the risk of collision with approaching pedestrians using a model that simulates approaching pedestrians as volumetric entities without vision, volumetric entities with vision, and as points for comparison with the prior work. Collision risk of approaching pedestrians is characterized for all three conditions through spatial collision risk maps and collision risk densities as a function of bearing and radial distances.

Results: The collision risk for volumetric pedestrians is slightly different from that of point pedestrians. For volumetric pedestrians simulated with normal vision, the risk of collision was reduced substantially, as the other pedestrians could detect and avoid most impending collisions. The remaining collision risk is from pedestrians approaching at higher bearing angles (>50°) and from shorter radial distances (<2 m). Thus, collisions occurred when the pedestrians started in front of the person with homonymous hemianopia that was overtaking the pedestrian.

Conclusions: The probability of collisions between pedestrians and the person with peripheral field loss is low and occurs only when the person with peripheral field loss is walking from behind the pedestrian at faster speed, thereby overtaking them. Such collisions occur with pedestrians at higher bearing angles, which should be monitored by assistive aids to avoid collisions. The same collision risk applies not only in homonymous hemianopia but also in other peripheral field loss such as monocular vision loss or concentric field loss, as common in retinitis pigmentosa and glaucoma.