Julia D DiTosto, Rebecca Zash, Denise L Jacobson, Katherine Johnson, Modiegi Diseko, Gloria Mayondi, Judith Mabuta, Mompati Mmalane, Joseph Makhema, Sunni L Mumford, Shahin Lockman, Roger Shapiro, Ellen C Caniglia
Background: Data on antihypertensive medication for non-severe gestational hypertension may suffer from immortal time and selection bias. Emulating target trials can prevent these biases by aligning follow-up with treatment initiation.
Objectives: We estimated the safety of antihypertensive medication initiation for the treatment of non-severe gestational hypertension on adverse birth outcomes in Botswana using sequential target trial emulation.
Methods: Data from the Tsepamo study (2014-2022), capturing birth outcomes at government delivery sites in Botswana, was used to examine antihypertensive medication initiation ≥ 24 weeks gestation for non-severe gestational hypertension (140-159 systolic or 90-109 diastolic blood pressure ≥ 20 weeks gestation without chronic hypertension). Sequential weekly target trial emulation compared initiation versus no initiation during 24-35 weeks' gestation on the risk of stillbirth and birth of infant small for gestational age (SGA), with secondary outcomes including very SGA, preterm birth, very preterm birth, neonatal death, and severe gestational hypertension. For each trial, eligible individuals were without chronic hypertension, had not previously initiated antihypertensive medication and had ≥ 2 non-severe blood pressure readings, at least one within 1 week of trial start. Log-binomial models estimated gestational week-specific and pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using bootstrapping.
Results: Of eligible individuals, there were 1676 antihypertensive initiator 'person-trials' and 5211 non-initiator 'person-trials'. In the pooled analysis, the adjusted RR for stillbirth and SGA comparing initiators to non-initiators was 0.92 (0.68, 1.19) and 1.09 (0.97, 1.23), respectively. The pooled adjusted RR for secondary outcomes were: very SGA, 1.05 (95% CI 0.88, 1.25); preterm birth, 1.09 (95% CI 0.96, 1.22); very preterm birth, 1.05 (95% CI 0.78, 1.47); neonatal death, 1.23 (95% CI 0.68, 2.24); severe gestational hypertension, 0.88 (95% CI 0.74, 1.07).
Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, antihypertensive medication initiation between 24 and 35 weeks' gestation for non-severe gestational hypertension was not associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.
背景:非重度妊娠期高血压的降压药数据可能存在不朽的时间和选择偏差。模拟目标试验可以通过调整随访与治疗开始来防止这些偏差。目的:我们使用序贯目标试验模拟来评估博茨瓦纳非严重妊娠期高血压患者开始使用降压药治疗不良分娩结局的安全性。方法:来自Tsepamo研究(2014-2022)的数据,捕获博茨瓦纳政府分娩地点的分娩结局,用于检查妊娠≥24周非严重妊娠高血压(140-159收缩压或90-109舒张压≥20周妊娠无慢性高血压)的抗高血压药物起始治疗。连续的每周目标试验模拟比较了妊娠24-35周启动与未启动对死胎和小于胎龄婴儿(SGA)出生风险的影响,次要结局包括非常SGA、早产、非常早产、新生儿死亡和严重妊娠期高血压。在每项试验中,符合条件的受试者均没有慢性高血压,以前没有服用过降压药物,并且有≥2次非严重血压读数,至少一次是在试验开始的1周内。对数二项模型估计妊娠周特异性和合并风险比(RR), 95%置信区间(CI)使用自举。结果:在符合条件的个体中,有1676例抗高血压启动者“人试验”和5211例非启动者“人试验”。在合并分析中,启动器与非启动器的死胎和SGA校正RR分别为0.92(0.68,1.19)和1.09(0.97,1.23)。次要结局的合并校正RR为:非常SGA, 1.05 (95% CI 0.88, 1.25);早产,1.09 (95% CI 0.96, 1.22);非常早产,1.05 (95% CI 0.78, 1.47);新生儿死亡率,1.23(95%可信区间0.68,2.24);严重妊娠期高血压,0.88 (95% CI 0.74, 1.07)。结论:在这项回顾性队列研究中,妊娠24 - 35周开始抗高血压药物治疗的非重度妊娠高血压与不良出生结局的风险增加无关。
{"title":"Safety of Antihypertensive Medication for the Management of Non-Severe Gestational Hypertension Among Pregnant Individuals in Botswana-Emulating a Series of Target Trials.","authors":"Julia D DiTosto, Rebecca Zash, Denise L Jacobson, Katherine Johnson, Modiegi Diseko, Gloria Mayondi, Judith Mabuta, Mompati Mmalane, Joseph Makhema, Sunni L Mumford, Shahin Lockman, Roger Shapiro, Ellen C Caniglia","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on antihypertensive medication for non-severe gestational hypertension may suffer from immortal time and selection bias. Emulating target trials can prevent these biases by aligning follow-up with treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We estimated the safety of antihypertensive medication initiation for the treatment of non-severe gestational hypertension on adverse birth outcomes in Botswana using sequential target trial emulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Tsepamo study (2014-2022), capturing birth outcomes at government delivery sites in Botswana, was used to examine antihypertensive medication initiation ≥ 24 weeks gestation for non-severe gestational hypertension (140-159 systolic or 90-109 diastolic blood pressure ≥ 20 weeks gestation without chronic hypertension). Sequential weekly target trial emulation compared initiation versus no initiation during 24-35 weeks' gestation on the risk of stillbirth and birth of infant small for gestational age (SGA), with secondary outcomes including very SGA, preterm birth, very preterm birth, neonatal death, and severe gestational hypertension. For each trial, eligible individuals were without chronic hypertension, had not previously initiated antihypertensive medication and had ≥ 2 non-severe blood pressure readings, at least one within 1 week of trial start. Log-binomial models estimated gestational week-specific and pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of eligible individuals, there were 1676 antihypertensive initiator 'person-trials' and 5211 non-initiator 'person-trials'. In the pooled analysis, the adjusted RR for stillbirth and SGA comparing initiators to non-initiators was 0.92 (0.68, 1.19) and 1.09 (0.97, 1.23), respectively. The pooled adjusted RR for secondary outcomes were: very SGA, 1.05 (95% CI 0.88, 1.25); preterm birth, 1.09 (95% CI 0.96, 1.22); very preterm birth, 1.05 (95% CI 0.78, 1.47); neonatal death, 1.23 (95% CI 0.68, 2.24); severe gestational hypertension, 0.88 (95% CI 0.74, 1.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, antihypertensive medication initiation between 24 and 35 weeks' gestation for non-severe gestational hypertension was not associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145346512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is the Most Likely Value Also the Best Imputation?","authors":"Stef van Buuren, Hanne I Oberman","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70081","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145293156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: As climate change worsens, instances of combined extreme heat and wildfire smoke events are becoming more frequent. Despite their increased vulnerability, investigations on the joint effect of wildfire smoke and extreme heat on children's health are limited.
Objective: To investigate the joint effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on paediatric acute care utilisation (ACU) in California from 2006 to 2019.
Methods: In this case-crossover analysis, we assembled a time-series dataset of warm seasons, (May-September) for 1772 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) in California from 2006 to 2019 to evaluate daily ACUs in the paediatric population (0-19 years). For wildfire smoke, we identified ZCTA-days exposed using a previously developed time-series dataset. For extreme heat, we calculated the daily ZCTA-specific maximum heat index. There were four exposure types: exposed to extreme heat alone, exposed to wildfire smoke alone, exposed to both events simultaneously (compound event) and not exposed to either event. We quantified the synergistic effects by comparing a child's exposures on the day when an ACU occurred to the child's exposure during control days.
Results: We found 1100-105,788 ZCTA-days where exposure to both extreme heat and wildfire smoke events occurred across eight combinations of event definitions. The relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) ranged up to 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.19) with thresholds of the 95th percentile for extreme heat and 35 μg/m3 for wildfire PM2.5, indicating a synergistic effect of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on paediatric ACUs. Positive RERIs were consistently observed for infectious enteritis, heat-related illness, asthma, endocrine nutritional and metabolic disease, and respiratory disease.
Conclusion: Investigating the synergistic effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke events in paediatric populations is necessary to develop effective health protection strategies.
{"title":"The Joint Effects of Extreme Heat and Wildfire Smoke on Paediatric Acute Care Utilisation.","authors":"Amal Syed, Chen Chen, Tarik Benmarhnia, Rupa Basu","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As climate change worsens, instances of combined extreme heat and wildfire smoke events are becoming more frequent. Despite their increased vulnerability, investigations on the joint effect of wildfire smoke and extreme heat on children's health are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the joint effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on paediatric acute care utilisation (ACU) in California from 2006 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-crossover analysis, we assembled a time-series dataset of warm seasons, (May-September) for 1772 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) in California from 2006 to 2019 to evaluate daily ACUs in the paediatric population (0-19 years). For wildfire smoke, we identified ZCTA-days exposed using a previously developed time-series dataset. For extreme heat, we calculated the daily ZCTA-specific maximum heat index. There were four exposure types: exposed to extreme heat alone, exposed to wildfire smoke alone, exposed to both events simultaneously (compound event) and not exposed to either event. We quantified the synergistic effects by comparing a child's exposures on the day when an ACU occurred to the child's exposure during control days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 1100-105,788 ZCTA-days where exposure to both extreme heat and wildfire smoke events occurred across eight combinations of event definitions. The relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) ranged up to 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.19) with thresholds of the 95th percentile for extreme heat and 35 μg/m<sup>3</sup> for wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub>, indicating a synergistic effect of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on paediatric ACUs. Positive RERIs were consistently observed for infectious enteritis, heat-related illness, asthma, endocrine nutritional and metabolic disease, and respiratory disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investigating the synergistic effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke events in paediatric populations is necessary to develop effective health protection strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth Simmons, Anna Austin, Mollie Wood, Alyssa J Mansfield, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah, Kavita Singh
Background: Compared to undergoing prenatal care with a physician, care with a midwife reduces the risk of medical interventions and complications during labor and delivery among low-risk pregnant individuals. However, many analyses that assess the relationship between midwifery-led care and birth outcomes condition on live births, potentially inducing a type of collider bias.
Objective: The objective was to analyse the change in prevalence of caesarean deliveries, primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric trauma, and maternal infection under hypothetical scenarios where midwifery-led prenatal care was increased.
Methods: Our sample included commercially insured, midwifery-eligible pregnant people in an insurance claims data source. We used g-computation to assess the change in prevalence of caesarean deliveries, primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric trauma, and maternal infection if 10%, 20%, and 50% more pregnant people enrolled in prenatal care with a midwife rather than a physician, among a cohort of low-risk pregnant people with commercial insurance in the U.S. between 2004 and 2015.
Results: With a 50% increase in midwifery-led care compared with no increase, we found the prevalence of caesarean deliveries was reduced by 5.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.7, -5.1) and of maternal infection decreased by 1.3 percentage points (95% CI -1.6, -1.0), while the prevalence of primary postpartum haemorrhage increased by 0.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 0.6) and of secondary postpartum haemorrhage increased by 0.6 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 0.7).
Conclusions: Increasing midwifery-led prenatal care reduced the prevalence of caesarean deliveries and maternal infections and slightly increased the prevalence of primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage. Our results were similar to those of studies among live birth cohorts.
背景:与接受医生产前护理相比,助产士护理降低了低风险孕妇在分娩和分娩过程中医疗干预和并发症的风险。然而,许多评估助产士主导的护理和分娩结果之间关系的分析对活产不利,可能会导致一种对撞机偏见。目的:目的是分析在助产士主导的产前护理增加的假设情况下,剖腹产、原发性和继发性产后出血、产科创伤和产妇感染的患病率的变化。方法:我们的样本包括保险索赔数据源中的商业保险,符合助产条件的孕妇。我们使用g计算来评估2004年至2015年间,在美国有商业保险的低风险孕妇队列中,如果有10%、20%和50%的孕妇参加助产士而不是医生的产前护理,剖腹产、原发性和继发性产后出血、产科创伤和孕产妇感染的患病率变化。结果:与没有增加相比,助产士主导的护理增加了50%,我们发现剖腹产的患病率降低了5.4个百分点(95%可信区间[CI] -5.7, -5.1),产妇感染的患病率降低了1.3个百分点(95% CI -1.6, -1.0),而原发性产后出血的患病率增加了0.5个百分点(95% CI 0.4, 0.6),继发性产后出血的患病率增加了0.6个百分点(95% CI 0.4, 0.7)。结论:增加助产士主导的产前护理降低了剖腹产和孕产妇感染的患病率,并略微增加了原发性和继发性产后出血的患病率。我们的结果与活产队列的研究结果相似。
{"title":"Impact of Increasing Midwifery-Led Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes: An Application of the g-Formula and Target Trial Emulation.","authors":"Elizabeth Simmons, Anna Austin, Mollie Wood, Alyssa J Mansfield, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah, Kavita Singh","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70077","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ppe.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to undergoing prenatal care with a physician, care with a midwife reduces the risk of medical interventions and complications during labor and delivery among low-risk pregnant individuals. However, many analyses that assess the relationship between midwifery-led care and birth outcomes condition on live births, potentially inducing a type of collider bias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to analyse the change in prevalence of caesarean deliveries, primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric trauma, and maternal infection under hypothetical scenarios where midwifery-led prenatal care was increased.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our sample included commercially insured, midwifery-eligible pregnant people in an insurance claims data source. We used g-computation to assess the change in prevalence of caesarean deliveries, primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric trauma, and maternal infection if 10%, 20%, and 50% more pregnant people enrolled in prenatal care with a midwife rather than a physician, among a cohort of low-risk pregnant people with commercial insurance in the U.S. between 2004 and 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a 50% increase in midwifery-led care compared with no increase, we found the prevalence of caesarean deliveries was reduced by 5.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.7, -5.1) and of maternal infection decreased by 1.3 percentage points (95% CI -1.6, -1.0), while the prevalence of primary postpartum haemorrhage increased by 0.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 0.6) and of secondary postpartum haemorrhage increased by 0.6 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing midwifery-led prenatal care reduced the prevalence of caesarean deliveries and maternal infections and slightly increased the prevalence of primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage. Our results were similar to those of studies among live birth cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145150417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Identifiability and Interpretation of Estimands Under Selection in Perinatal Research.","authors":"Louisa H Smith","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ending Pregnancy Ends Risks. Consistent Questions, Estimands, Estimates, and Interpretation in the Presence of Competing Events.","authors":"Jeremy P Brown, Sonia Hernández-Díaz","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70076","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle T Delahanty, Stephanie Engel, Dani Fallin, Tanya Garcia, Christine Ladd-Acosta, Anne Steiner, Mollie Wood, Julie L Daniels
Background: Prior studies report associations between periconceptional exposure to natural and synthetic oestrogen and progesterone and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Hormonal contraception contains synthetic forms of one or both hormones. Although hormonal contraception is highly effective when consistently used, unintended pregnancy can occur with irregular use. Given the popularity of hormonal contraception, foetal exposure in utero is possible, yet the potential consequences are unknown.
Objectives: We investigated the association between periconceptional hormonal contraception use and the development of ASD in offspring.
Methods: We analysed data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a population-based case-control study conducted in select US states, from 2007 to 2020. Children with and without ASD were identified from clinical/education sources and vital records, respectively, and enrolled at ages 2.5-5 years. We confirmed the ASD case status by in-person developmental assessment. We assessed hormonal contraception via a structured interview. We assessed the associations between ASD and hormonal contraception exposure separately for contraception discontinued in the 3 months prior to pregnancy and contraception continued during pregnancy using logistic models to estimate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for biological mother age, education, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), and presence of gynaecologic conditions and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Of 5210 participants, 9.9% reported discontinuing hormonal contraception use before pregnancy and 2.3% reported continuing use during pregnancy. A suggestive association was found between ASD and hormonal contraception use during pregnancy (aOR 1.38,95% CI 0.93, 2.05). There was no association with use prior to pregnancy (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84, 1.25).
Conclusions: Discontinuation of hormonal contraception prior to conception was not associated with ASD. The prevalence of hormonal contraception use during pregnancy was low. Results were imprecise and may be impacted by recall bias and unmeasured confounding by indication and health behaviours related to planning pregnancy.
背景:先前的研究报告了妊娠期暴露于天然和合成雌激素和黄体酮与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)之间的关系。激素避孕包含一种或两种激素的合成形式。虽然激素避孕在持续使用时非常有效,但不规律使用可能会发生意外怀孕。鉴于激素避孕的普及,胎儿在子宫内暴露是可能的,但潜在的后果尚不清楚。目的:探讨围孕期激素避孕与后代ASD发展的关系。方法:我们分析了研究早期发展(SEED)的数据,这是一项基于人群的病例对照研究,于2007年至2020年在美国选定的州进行。研究人员分别从临床/教育来源和生命记录中确定患有和不患有ASD的儿童,并在2.5-5岁时入组。我们通过面对面的发育评估来确认ASD病例的状态。我们通过结构化访谈评估激素避孕。我们分别评估了怀孕前3个月停止避孕和怀孕期间继续避孕的ASD与激素避孕暴露之间的关系,使用logistic模型来估计经生母年龄、教育程度、胎次、孕前体重指数(BMI)和妇科疾病存在校正的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在5210名参与者中,9.9%的人在怀孕前停止使用激素避孕,2.3%的人在怀孕期间继续使用激素避孕。ASD与妊娠期间使用激素避孕之间存在相关性(aOR 1.38,95% CI 0.93, 2.05)。与妊娠前使用无相关性(aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84, 1.25)。结论:怀孕前停止激素避孕与ASD无关。怀孕期间激素避孕的使用率较低。结果不精确,可能受到回忆偏差和与计划怀孕相关的指征和健康行为的未测量混淆的影响。
{"title":"Periconceptional Hormonal Contraception Use and Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Study to Explore Early Development.","authors":"Michelle T Delahanty, Stephanie Engel, Dani Fallin, Tanya Garcia, Christine Ladd-Acosta, Anne Steiner, Mollie Wood, Julie L Daniels","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies report associations between periconceptional exposure to natural and synthetic oestrogen and progesterone and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Hormonal contraception contains synthetic forms of one or both hormones. Although hormonal contraception is highly effective when consistently used, unintended pregnancy can occur with irregular use. Given the popularity of hormonal contraception, foetal exposure in utero is possible, yet the potential consequences are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated the association between periconceptional hormonal contraception use and the development of ASD in offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a population-based case-control study conducted in select US states, from 2007 to 2020. Children with and without ASD were identified from clinical/education sources and vital records, respectively, and enrolled at ages 2.5-5 years. We confirmed the ASD case status by in-person developmental assessment. We assessed hormonal contraception via a structured interview. We assessed the associations between ASD and hormonal contraception exposure separately for contraception discontinued in the 3 months prior to pregnancy and contraception continued during pregnancy using logistic models to estimate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for biological mother age, education, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), and presence of gynaecologic conditions and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5210 participants, 9.9% reported discontinuing hormonal contraception use before pregnancy and 2.3% reported continuing use during pregnancy. A suggestive association was found between ASD and hormonal contraception use during pregnancy (aOR 1.38,95% CI 0.93, 2.05). There was no association with use prior to pregnancy (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84, 1.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discontinuation of hormonal contraception prior to conception was not associated with ASD. The prevalence of hormonal contraception use during pregnancy was low. Results were imprecise and may be impacted by recall bias and unmeasured confounding by indication and health behaviours related to planning pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145125718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Considerations When Generalising Using Survey Sampling Weights.","authors":"Michael Webster-Clark, Asma M Ahmed","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70078","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145125730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vanessa Hébert, Irina I Oltean, Giulia M Muraca, Nancy Santesso, Elizabeth K Darling
Background: Estimating the causal effect of third-stage management approaches on preventing postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the context of physiologic birth using observational data requires conditioning on specific variables, with selection relying on assumptions about their roles in the exposure-outcome pathway that are rarely made explicit.
Objectives: To apply the evidence synthesis for constructing DAGs approach, incorporating findings from a systematic review, to develop a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) that clarifies these assumptions and identifies the minimum set of variables needed to reduce bias in estimating the causal effects of physiologic third-stage care versus oxytocin prophylaxis on PPH.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to December 15, 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (to July 8, 2024), and reference lists of eligible studies.
Study selection and data extraction: The systematic review included randomised and non-randomised studies involving individuals with physiologic birth or minimal obstetric interventions. Two authors independently screened studies. DAG development was based on the subset of non-randomised studies. For each, one reviewer extracted outcome, exposure, control variables and mediators.
Synthesis: Eligible studies were analysed in three stages: (i) mapping each study's saturated implied graph; (ii) translating each posited connection using causal criteria to create study-specific DAGs; (iii) synthesising individual DAGs into an integrated DAG. The assumptions underlying this process were specific to the midwifery context in Ontario, Canada and translation was guided by midwifery expertise and existing literature.
Results: Four non-randomised studies were included. Expert consultation identified 20 factors influencing third-stage management. The integrated DAG comprised 339 directed edges connecting 35 covariates, yielding four minimal sufficient adjustment sets.
Conclusions: The integrated DAG and minimal sufficient adjustment sets are valuable tools for informing future study design and analysis, helping to minimise bias in estimating the causal effect of physiologic third-stage care versus oxytocin prophylaxis on PPH in the context of physiologic birth, while also exposing the assumptions about causal relationships between variables to scrutiny.
背景:在生理性分娩的背景下,使用观察数据估计第三阶段管理方法对预防产后出血(PPH)的因果效应需要对特定变量进行调节,选择依赖于它们在暴露-结局途径中的作用的假设,而这些假设很少明确。目的:应用证据综合构建DAG方法,结合系统综述的发现,建立因果有向无环图(DAG),澄清这些假设,并确定在估计生理性第三阶段护理与催产素预防对PPH的因果影响时减少偏差所需的最小变量集。数据来源:MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(截止到2023年12月15日),ClinicalTrials.gov(截止到2024年7月8日),以及符合条件的研究参考列表。研究选择和数据提取:系统评价包括随机和非随机研究,涉及生理性分娩或最小产科干预的个体。两位作者独立筛选了研究。DAG的发展是基于非随机研究的子集。对于每一项,一位审稿人提取了结果、暴露、控制变量和中介因素。综合:分三个阶段对符合条件的研究进行分析:(i)绘制每个研究的饱和隐含图;(ii)使用因果标准翻译每个假定的联系,以创建研究特定的dag;(iii)将单个DAG合成为一个完整的DAG。这一过程的基本假设是针对加拿大安大略省助产的具体情况,翻译以助产专业知识和现有文献为指导。结果:纳入了4项非随机研究。专家咨询确定了影响第三阶段管理的20个因素。综合DAG包括339条有向边,连接35个协变量,产生4个最小充分调整集。结论:综合DAG和最小充分调整集是为未来的研究设计和分析提供信息的有价值的工具,有助于最大限度地减少在估计生理性分娩背景下生理性第三阶段护理与催产素预防对PPH的因果影响时的偏差,同时也暴露了变量之间因果关系的假设。
{"title":"Estimating Causal Effects of Third-Stage Management on Postpartum Haemorrhage in a Midwifery Context: An Evidence Synthesis Approach for Constructing Directed Acyclic Graphs.","authors":"Vanessa Hébert, Irina I Oltean, Giulia M Muraca, Nancy Santesso, Elizabeth K Darling","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimating the causal effect of third-stage management approaches on preventing postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the context of physiologic birth using observational data requires conditioning on specific variables, with selection relying on assumptions about their roles in the exposure-outcome pathway that are rarely made explicit.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To apply the evidence synthesis for constructing DAGs approach, incorporating findings from a systematic review, to develop a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) that clarifies these assumptions and identifies the minimum set of variables needed to reduce bias in estimating the causal effects of physiologic third-stage care versus oxytocin prophylaxis on PPH.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to December 15, 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (to July 8, 2024), and reference lists of eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>The systematic review included randomised and non-randomised studies involving individuals with physiologic birth or minimal obstetric interventions. Two authors independently screened studies. DAG development was based on the subset of non-randomised studies. For each, one reviewer extracted outcome, exposure, control variables and mediators.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>Eligible studies were analysed in three stages: (i) mapping each study's saturated implied graph; (ii) translating each posited connection using causal criteria to create study-specific DAGs; (iii) synthesising individual DAGs into an integrated DAG. The assumptions underlying this process were specific to the midwifery context in Ontario, Canada and translation was guided by midwifery expertise and existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four non-randomised studies were included. Expert consultation identified 20 factors influencing third-stage management. The integrated DAG comprised 339 directed edges connecting 35 covariates, yielding four minimal sufficient adjustment sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integrated DAG and minimal sufficient adjustment sets are valuable tools for informing future study design and analysis, helping to minimise bias in estimating the causal effect of physiologic third-stage care versus oxytocin prophylaxis on PPH in the context of physiologic birth, while also exposing the assumptions about causal relationships between variables to scrutiny.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}